Please keep in mind that the same gun,
ammunition, and choke-related criticisms I made about the Jones video apply
to the myscienceproject.org report, but the most important evidence of this
report (in my opinion) comes from the close range shooting tests, where choke
and ammunition variables are less pronounced. In these close range test, Jones’
contention that Whittington was shot at 15-18 feet are proven absurd
by the massive damage of a shotgun blast at such a short range. Harry Whittington
simply could not be out of the hospital (and would more than likely be in the
morgue) if shot at the distance Jones speculates. I’d also like to state
that I’m willing to take a polygraph to support my contentions, providing
you can find one in the Raleigh, NC area. I doubt this would be difficult. I’d
also ask that Mr. Jones review my post and this alternate shooting report, and
then take a polygraph of his own. – confederateyankee
Let's move on. Really. We've proved our case. If more
information comes to us, we'll keep you posted. That said, the bulk of email
requires a response.
This is going to be quick because I simply can't continue to state
our contentions, the facts, or the bulk of evidence again and again. First,
you should see my emails on why the Alex Jones video is wrong. So, here we go
again.
First and again, our contention that Whittington was shot
at about 15 YARDS was made long before we saw the video. In fact, we
were the first to openly challenge Cheney's, hmmmm, what to call it? There's
only one thing to call it: alibi. The video came after the fact. If you don't
believe the video, fine, don't, but that in no way changes our conclusions.
Secondly, I've now gotten enough “science projects”
to last a lifetime. We looked at as many as possible, but we did our own long
before it became in vogue and our judgment stands. Send the rest to Texas. Better
yet, send them to Mary Matalin. Maybe she'll use it in her next “Meet the
Press” smackdown.
Thirdly, there are evidently other “liberal bloggers”
out there talking about what ConfederateYankee does as well, that is a “15-18
feet” shot. That's not a contention made by this liberal or my gun guy
husband, who happens to be an expert.
Again, with feeling, our contention and that of many others, even
people up the arms ladder chain, is that Whittington was hit at 15 YARDS.
Nothing presented has changed this judgment, which, again, has been made by
others as this furor was unleashed.
To say that I find it odd that people are willing to take a polygraph
so I will know they are not lying is absurd in the extreme. Neither me or my
husband are saying anyone is lying, or that the Alex Jones video is the proof
on which we based our conclusions. I believe the wingnuts truly want to exonerate
their guy. It's just not going to happen on this one, so please, don't embarrass
yourself any further. If you need a polygraph to prove you're telling the truth,
take one, post it. I'm not interested.
Our truth is in every post we've written.
It would also help if people didn't send me emails talking about
15-18 feet and that Alex Jones is wrong. Send your emails to him, because I'm
not his proxy. I offered the video so as many people as possible could see the
two in-depth videos currently available, which are still on this blog. Lots
of amateur videos exist, but I picked those two. Other blogs will have to host
other videos.
But again, our facts, field test and final conclusion are based
on our own independent analysis first, with the facts gathered and judgment
made long before anyone else, including the guys with the videos, came forward
doubting Cheney's alibi or supporting it and trying to prove Cheney's facts
were true. I've got one of each on this blog, including other information, make
your own assessment.
One last thing, there was one way to keep this confusion and independent
analysis from spinning off into polygraph poppycock and wingnut blogs talking
about FEET instead of YARDS, trying to save Dick Cheney's riddled political
carcass. If the vice president had come forward in the beginning we wouldn't
even be having this discussion. But he didn't so we are.
There are many other important topics to discuss, towards which
I must turn my attention. However, we are listening and receiving credible information
all the time. If I get any pertinent and new details on the swiss cheese
alibi of Dick Cheney, I'll let you know. Otherwise, we've proved our point,
bolstered by others weighing in too, beyond what the video shows. Our analysis
stands.
Comments are closed.