Being prepared for anything is one thing, but the neocons are just gnashing
their teeth for more war, not to mention nudging it along. As for the presidential
candidates, no one is willing to go out on a limb and criticize Israel on anything, but
Rudy
is positively nuts if he thinks his ideas are going to help anyone.
Bush is not talking. The questioner is David Gregory:
Q Sir, Israeli opposition leader Netanyahu has now spoken openly about Israel’s
bombing raid on a target in Syria earlier in the month. I wonder if you could
tell us what the target was, whether you supported this bombing raid, and
what do you think it does to change the dynamic in an already hot region in
terms of Syria and Iran and the dispute with Israel and whether the U.S. could
be drawn into any of this?THE PRESIDENT: I’m not going to comment on the matter. Would you like another
question?Q Did you support it?
THE PRESIDENT: I’m not going to comment on the matter.
Q Can you comment about your concerns that come out of it at all, about for
the region?THE PRESIDENT: No. Saying I’m not going to comment on the matter means I’m
not going to comment on the matter. You’re welcome to ask another question,
if you’d like to, on a different subject.
UPDATE: Lieberman is up to no good again and it’s worse than his nonsense on Iraq. (Here’s a different link on the same subject.) Target Iran:
… … (snip) … ..
(b) Sense of Senate.–It is the sense of the Senate–
(1) that the manner in which the United States transitions and structures
its military presence in Iraq will have critical long-term consequences for
the future of the Persian Gulf and the Middle East, in particular with regard
to the capability of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran to pose
a threat to the security of the region, the prospects for democracy for the
people of the region, and the health of the global economy;(2) that it is a vital national interest of the United States to prevent
the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran from turning Shi’a militia
extremists in Iraq into a Hezbollah-like force that could serve its interests
inside Iraq, including by overwhelming, subverting, or co-opting institutions
of the legitimate Government of Iraq;(3) that it should be the policy of the United States to combat, contain,
and roll back the violent activities and destabilizing influence inside Iraq
of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, its foreign facilitators
such as Lebanese Hezbollah, and its indigenous Iraqi proxies;(4) to support the prudent and calibrated use of all instruments of United
States national power in Iraq, including diplomatic, economic, intelligence,
and military instruments, in support of the policy described in paragraph
(3) with respect to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran and its
proxies;(5) that the United States should designate the Islamic Revolutionary Guards
Corps as a foreign terrorist organization under section 219 of the Immigration
and Nationality Act and place the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps on the
list of Specially Designated Global Terrorists, as established under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act and initiated under Executive Order 13224; and(6) that the Department of the Treasury should act with all possible expediency
to complete the listing of those entities targeted under United Nations Security
Council Resolutions 1737 and 1747 adopted unanimously on December 23, 2006
and March 24, 2007, respectively. … ..










Comments are closed.