Obama’s Transparency Hypocrisy

Obama's Transparency Hypocrisy updated

If you want to know why I'm adamantly against negative personal attacks
on our own, as well as attacks on substance that not only don't hold water but boomerang on the attacking candidate, Obama is exhibit B today.

Bill Maher in his “new rules” segment makes another observation:

“When you're supposed to be taking off the gloves and really letting your opponent have it, don't get caught checking out her ass.” – Bill Maher

Just say thank you, sir. It's never a bad thing to turn a man's head. Not. Ever. (Note to nitwits: This is a joke. Bill Maher, photos spliced, Get it? You still say thank you.)

Now to Lynn Sweet:

White House hopeful Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), who is making government transparency a centerpiece of the latest phase of his campaign, does not always practice what he preaches when it comes to his own business. Obama is accusing chief rival Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) of being secretive and slowing down the release of her official first lady papers in the Clinton Library, documents that could help buttress — or erode — her claim of presidential experience. … .. An Obama spokesman, Ben Labolt, last week declined to say where Obama's records from his years in the Illinois State Senate are located. There is no law mandating the state to archive the records. The records from Obama's office — if he kept them — would potentially show appointments with lobbyists, policy memos, meetings, etc. Obama has supported more earmark disclosure to bolster government transparency. Last June, Obama disclosed the earmarks he requested for Illinois and national interests. However, his office, after repeated requests since June, has yet to disclose earmarks Obama sought in 2006, before he was running for president. Obama does list the names of hundreds of bundlers — people committed to raising at least $50,000 for the campaign — on his Web site. He brags about the disclosure on the stump. But that's literally all Obama does, list a name. No cities or states, information that is available to his campaign. Some names are well known because the bundlers are celebrities or longtime activists. But it's a big country, and there are more than one Bob Clark and Lou Cohen. Just listing a name does lip service to meaningful disclosure. Obama campaign manager David Plouffe, in a memo sent last week after the debate, said Obama is “setting a new standard of openness in campaign fund-raising.” That's because the bar is very low. Obama's campaign has refused to identify the biggest bundlers, people who are raising at least $200,000 for him and are given membership in his National Finance Council. Obama, as all major candidates, declines most of the time to disclose details about most fund-raising events. During a town hall meeting last month in Dover, N.H., Obama pledged that he would post all meetings he would hold as president on the Internet. As a senator, Obama has never done that. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) routinely releases a detailed schedule of his Washington, D.C., meetings — with international leaders, Illinois state and local officials, constituents and lobbyists. Obama record on transparency lacking. Where are his state senate records?

Note to all Democrats running for president: If you're going to run an attack
campaign against a fellow Democrat it would help if you actually followed the
rules you're spouting. Considering we're all supposed to be in this together it's
not a small thing to ask.