TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Archive | December, 2008

2008: Politics in Pictures… as Relocation Draws Near

–updated–

This has been the most incredibly rewarding year, with next year sure to bring many opportunities. Of course, I’m still not on the air, but never say never, baby. People have often said I’m the very definition of tenacious. It’s not over until it’s over.

Going from neutral observer to Hillary advocate was never planned, but it was the most satisfying, justified, happy, yet back breaking moments in my political memory. No one deserved support more than Hillary. It all paid off too, even when some abandoned our goals. Because the people who stuck with Hillary all the way to wholeheartedly supporting Barack Obama were well justified, as was witnessed through his nod to her for secretary of state, which revealed the strong national security policy President Obama will implement that has as its core component muscular diplomacy and outreach. Watching it all play out in 2009 will be remarkable, no matter what unfolds.

So, obviously, there are way too many pictures to share, even in these small shots, but here are a few from a year I’ll never forget. Thanks to everyone who shared much of it with me.

Clinton on the stump.


Day of interview with Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame.


Time out to visit dear friends in Los Angeles, the place I call home.


Women’s event for Hillary in D.C.
(Compliments of a generous friend’s invitation, someone who chose to split with me, as did others, creating a moment when I once again became a favorite target in blog posts, complete with blaring headlines featuring my name and nothing nice.)


The late Stephanie Tubbs Jones, along with Chelsea Clinton and Mrs. Rodham.


To Denver: The greatest road trip evah!
…a time when I fell in love with Colorado.


Clinton releases her delegates. Collective kitty implosion followed.


DEM CONVENTION: The view from the NBC sky booth.


Rock star alert. William Jefferson Clinton strolls by outside the NBC sky booth. Journalists and reporters from all quarters around me scurried to get his picture.


The view from the NBC sky booth.
(Thanks to Al-Jazeera English and NBC.)
If I told you what happened on this particular day you wouldn’t believe it. That I could get my hair to do anything after the day I had was a frickin’ miracle.


Invesco Field.


Invesco Field.


by “Eck & Scan”


“Truman Named To Run With F.D.R.; Victory Credited To Hanngean”
During a trip to to see my big brother, the man who introduced me to politics as a kid, we stopped by Hanngegan’s on Laclede’s Landing in St. Louis. What a wonderful display of Democratic history awaits in the far back corners of this restaurant. If you’re ever there have a beer and take a look.


Our relocation tour took us across the west to San Francisco and beyond, to the Pacific Northwest. …and now it’s over. It’s been a long journey. I’ll announce our new city on News Years Day.
Read full story · Comments are closed

Zbig Smiles, then Takes Joe Scarborough Out

BY TAYLOR MARSH




“You know, you have such a stunningly superficial knowledge of what went on that it’s almost embarrassing to listen to you.” – Former U.S. National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski

Ouch.

Topic free for all. Have at it.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Fruit Falls from The Poison Political Tree

BY TAYLOR MARSH
–updated–


video via ProgressIllinois

Forgive me, but I find this down right hilarious.



… Though he is 71, Burris has said that Obama’s replacement should be able to win re-election and he has noted that despite a string of primary losses in races ranging from Chicago mayor to governor and U.S. senator, he’s never lost to a Republican.

Blagojevich, who has sole authority to name a replacement senator, scheduled a 2 p.m. news conference at his downtown Chicago office.

Blagojevich’s criminal defense attorney Ed Genson had said Blagojevich would not name a Senate successor to Obama. The governor had indicated he agreed with other Illinois politicians that the best option might be a special election to fill Obama’s seat. But state lawmakers have not taken up the necessary legislation.

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada previously warned Blagojevich, following the governor’s Dec. 9 arrest, that Senate Democrats would not seat any appointment the two-term Democratic governor made. Reid’s warning was contained in a letter signed by all 50 sitting Democratic senators, including the No. 2 Democrat in Senate leadership, Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois. [...]

Frankly, I wouldn’t have posted on Blago’s pick for the Senate, but he seems to have not only taken on Harry Reid, but also Barack Obama. Daring the Democrats to reject Burris, as promised.

It’s quite simply Gov. Blagojevich’s play to seem relevant, sober, as well as reasonable for picking an African American resident of Illinois who has kept himself from getting dirty while playing Chicago politics. He’s also daring the Dems to deny an African American the appointment.

However, Reid isn’t usually confrontational, that is unless you cross him after he’s made his feelings known. There’s no reason to believe the Senate will seat Burris. Consider the appointment fruit from the poison political tree.

Still, it seems Blago has called the Democrats’ bluff. He’s certainly got nothing to lose.

UPDATE: The Senate Dem. leadership responds with a statement:



“It is truly regrettable that despite requests from all 50 Democratic Senators and public officials throughout Illinois, Gov. Blagojevich would take the imprudent step of appointing someone to the United States Senate who would serve under a shadow and be plagued by questions of impropriety. We say this without prejudice toward Roland Burris’s ability, and we respect his years of public service. But this is not about Mr. Burris; it is about the integrity of a governor accused of attempting to sell this United States Senate seat. Under these circumstances, anyone appointed by Gov. Blagojevich cannot be an effective representative of the people of Illinois and, as we have said, will not be seated by the Democratic Caucus.

“Next week we will start one of the most important debates of the year – outlining an economic recovery plan to create jobs and invest in America. And in the coming weeks, we will be working to protect homeowners and consumers, make America more energy independent, strengthen our national security, and improve health care and educational opportunities. There is much work to do and a lot at stake. It is thus critical that Illinois and every other state have two seated Senators without delay.

“We again urge Gov. Blagojevich to not make this appointment. It is unfair to Mr. Burris, it is unfair to the people of Illinois and it will ultimately not stand. The governor must put the interests of the people of Illinois and all Americans first by stepping aside now and letting his successor appoint someone who we will seat.”

Read full story · Comments are closed

Israel, Cease Fire

–updated–


An article by David Grossman in Haaretz asks the big question: Is Israel too imprisoned in the familiar ceremony of war?

I’ve got another one: When is Israel going to act like the country she has become?

Someone I know and respect has written a heart felt plea to Israel. Lorelei Kelly is pleading, but will Israeli leaders hear?



A behavior is strategic if it influences others by affecting their expectations. This principle of conflict resolution is one that is particularly relevant to the threats in today’s world. Neatly defined and bounded states like the ones on political maps don’t matter so much anymore. It’s people that count. The safety of people across borders is as important as the safety of people within borders. This means that if you want ultimate victory, persuasion deserves as much firepower as coercion. American counterinsurgency doctrine enshrines civilian protection for Iraq and Afghanistan–but this responsibility to protect people has huge implications for our general situation in today’s world: Killing lots of people on the other side is not only ineffective, it is counterproductive. It hurts your cause. It gets more of your own people killed in the long run. Like Israel–whose overwhelmingly violent response to Hamas rocket attacks seems to lack the most basic strategic or political meaning–and where language such as “self-defense”,– words from the disconnected and bygone era of nation states–seems quaint and almost entirely inaccurate. [...]

Instead, according to reports, Israel has rejected the ceasefire from the U.N.’s Ki-Moon. Israel is intent on continuing the fighting: “The Israeli army must not stop the operation before breaking the will of the Palestinians, of Hamas, to continue to fire at Israel,” quoting Interior Minister Meir Sheetrit.

Israeli leaders are addicted to a cycle that has never produced an outcome of peace and never will. Lorelei Kelly is correct when she says Israel is better than this. The truth is we also have to expect better than this from nations. We cannot continue the Bush legacy of military “shock and awe,” pretending that there aren’t larger consequences to “breaking the will of Palestinians, of Hamas,” the latter seemingly thrown in as an afterthought. However, this isn’t the only opinion, with cracks already appearing.

Israel must cease fire. Hamas must be reined in. Unfortunately, the Bush administration has sent the message to Israel throughout the last eight years that Israel’s policy is U.S. policy. This must end. We’ll have to pray that Obama, through Biden and Clinton, can make the break, finally differentiating between Israeli policy and U.S. policy. The U.S. must lead once again, not simply acquiesce to Israel’s every military turn.

Meanwhile, Israel plays into Hamas’ hands, even as Egypt’s war with Hamas breaks into the open.



… Khaled Meshal, the Damascus-based head of Hamas’ political bureau, has been calling for a cease-fire for two days now. However, communications with the organization’s leadership in Gaza are hampered because all its leaders have gone underground for fear of Israeli assassination attempts, while Israel’s air strikes have disrupted the Strip’s communications networks. Paradoxically, the same measures that have hampered Hamas’ military response are also impeding efforts to end the fighting. [...] On July 12, 2006, hours after the Second Lebanon War began, Barak called Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and warned: “It’s very important to define how and when you’ll end [the war], because the more time goes by, the greater the potential for complications.” That is no less true today. …

Israel, cease fire.

But don’t expect George W. Bush to ask this of our friend. He hasn’t been a leader of peace in eight years. He’s not going to start now.

UPDATE: Just in case you don’t quite understand the people arrayed against Hamas, it’s not just the Israelis. Moderate Arabs just might see the changing of the American guard to an Obama administration as a chance to break the cycle. Israel needs to see the opportunity and grab it. It may not be a way out, but a way through to leaving the past behind.

Read full story · Comments are closed

‘The Wheels of the Bandwagon are Coming Off’

A New York Daily News columnist said “the wheels of the bandwagon are
coming off.” – AP

What a cool customer New York Governor Paterson has turned out to be. Because at the end of this, if Caroline Kennedy does not get appointed to the Senate, one big reason will be because of Gov. Paterson’s calm, unwavering strength to do absolutely nothing in the face of a lot of Democratic elite pressure to pick the Kennedy. His ability to do nothing and wait has allowed the clock to tick, giving Mrs. Kennedy time to make her case. Unfortunately, the more people hear from her the worse her reviews get.

um… like, you know. I mean, wow. What an interview. I lost count at around 140 “you knows.”

It might not be the unraveling, but when Rep. Rangel caused a media kerfuffle saying Paterson had made the choice, then used “he” to describe that choice, speculation ran amok.

Now comes the drip, drip, drip, of Kennedy’s, you know, um… clueless case for herself, which has turned into a late entry for embarrassment of the year. She’s not exactly Sarah Palin, but, um… you know, because Sarah Palin could at least string sentences toge— Oh, never mind. This has gotten way too weird.


CK: Have you guys ever thought about writing for, like, a woman’s magazine
or something? (Laughter)

DH: What do you have against women’s magazines?

CK: Nothing at all, but I thought you were the crack political team here.
As I said, it was kind of over a period of time, you know, obviously we talked
about politics, we talked about what’s going on, we’ve been watching
the team that the president-elect is putting together — Hillary Clinton
is going to be a spectacular part of that team, you know, then there was a
vacancy here, you know, just like everybody else, you know: who’s going
to fill it, isn’t that interesting, there’s a lot of great candidates,
you know, obviously I have become much more politically involved than I have
in the past, so you know, I figure, why not try, I really think I have something
to offer.

Um… okay. Whatever.

Now I don’t care who gets the Senate seat in New York, but the celebrity angle
embodied in Caroline Kennedy wanting the job wouldn’t be so insulting if she
didn’t speak like, you know, some teenager trying to figure out
how to, um… well, you know, lie her way through a job interview.

There’s an old saying. Fake it ’til you make it. Caroline Kennedy hasn’t even
been able to fake it. So as Governor Paterson stands patiently by he’s likely set himself up to make the choice he actually wants, not the choice the Democratic elite are pushing on him. But as things go in American politics that could still mean another Senator Kennedy, regardless of, you know, the case she’s made for herself.

Read full story · Comments are closed

White Red Rock

BY TAYLOR MARSH


With XM’s Deep Tracks blasting Steve Winwood’s rendition of “Why can’t we all live together,” off we road.

The natural splendor of Red Rock is one of the tonics that has kept me sane in the cement neon jungle out here in Nevada, after being marooned since I couldn’t get my radio show back on the air. The natural beauty of it this Christmas, however, was simply stunning. Snow does that to mountains, no matter their size. It also seemed like a beautiful send off for us, as we plan to move into new territory, something I’ll share soon.

Hopefully you’ve been enjoying the holiday, with the New Year fast approaching, as we ring in the festivities in a big way across this country. The last year we have to endure an Administration that has sacked America’s image, while ignoring real challenges we face.

It’s been one of the most fantastic, surprising and back breaking years of my professional life. So many wonderful twists for me, for which I’m eternally grateful. The hope I have for the New Year, however, exceeds anything I’ve dreamt about previously. High expectations define it.

What are you hoping for next year, personally and otherwise? It’s a good time to talk about it.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Ehud Barak: It’s ‘All Out War’

–updated–


For President-elect Obama, the mantra remains “one president at a time.”

Iraqi cleric Ayatollah
Ali al-Sistani has weighed in
to urge everyone to fight against Israel.
Juan Cole asks a good question.


Top Iraqi cleric Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani has called for decisive action
by Arab and Muslim states for an end to Israeli attacks on Gaza.

“Condemning what is going on in Gaza and supporting our brothers only
with words is meaningless, considering the big tragedy they are facing,”
Grand Ayatollah al-Sistani said, in a statement released by his office in
Najaf.

“Arab and Islamic nations need to take a decisive stance, now more than
ever, to end these ongoing aggressions and to break the unjust siege imposed
on the brave people of Gaza,” the Ayatollah said.

Haaretz reports
Senior Islamic Jihad commander killed in Israeli strike on Gaza.

Hamas threatens
to assassinate
Livni and Ehud Barak (video at link).

It’s “all
out war”
:


“This operation will be extended and deepened as we find necessary.
Our goal is to strike Hamas and stop the attacks on Israel. Hamas controls
Gaza and is responsible for everything happening there and for all attacks
carried out from within the Strip. The goals of this operation are to stop
Hamas from attacking our citizens and soldiers,” said Barak.

Israeli operation long
in planning
. One goal is to have no comparison with the Lebanon war, which left Israel weaker.


Livni and other Israeli officials have spoken openly of wishing to topple
Hamas since the Islamist movement took over from the western-backed, Fatah-dominated
Palestinian Authority (PA) in June 2007. But this may be something less ambitious.
“The realistic objective of any military operation is not the ousting
of Hamas, but rather … undermining its military effectiveness and weakening
its rule,” is the view of Yediot Aharonot analyst Alex Fishman.

To add… Steve Clemons has a guest post up that is a must read, though the views are not necessarily those of TM.com: View From a Palestinian Leader: Palestine’s Guernica and the Myths of Israeli Victimhood.

Needless to say, the Israeli attack on Hamas is the main news of the day, but feel free to add stories you’re reading, as well as other reactions to what’s going on between Israel and Hamas.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Gird Your Loins

Getting the last licks in before Bush leaves office? Check. Challenging Obama’s foreign policy to take a stand straight out on Middle East policy? Check. Joe Biden’s words ring out as loudly today as when he said them.

But how many times are the Israelis going to try the same tactics expecting different
results than have come to pass before? Fly meet screen.

The same goes for American leaders, specifically
Barack Obama, who will be challenged immediately upon entering the presidency
to put in place a message on the Middle East, testing his mettle on what it
means to change the course of U.S. foreign policy after Bush-Cheney. With AIPAC staring over his
shoulder, no doubt Obama’s initial reaction will be scrutinized.

Will the new president have
the courage to dust off the Neanderthal thinking of the likes of Marty Peretz
who is obviously intent on pushing the Likud line until we all implode on our
traditional myopia? From his latest rant on the Israeli strike against Hamas
in Gaza, Peretz
is exhibit A
for why the U.S. must demand more from both Israelis and Palestinians, but also American writers opining on American foreign policy in the Middle East.


… The government in Jerusalem had made it unmistakably clear that it would
no longer tolerate this fire power aimed at innocent civilian life. It had
been saying this for months to an increasingly skeptical and apprehensive,
not to say, restive public. And to Hamas which didn’t seem to care. Instead,
it threatened Israel by word and follow-up deeds that confirmed the recklessness
– as if confirmation was needed- of also this Palestinian “liberation”
movement, the last in the long line of terrorist revolutionaries acting in
the name of pathetic and blood-thirsty Palestine.

So at 11:30 on Saturday morning, according to both the Jerusalem Post and
Ha’aretz, as well as the New York Times, 50 fighter jets and attack helicopters
demolished some 40 to 50 sites in just about three minutes, maybe five. Message:
do not fuck with the Jews. At roughly noon, another 60 air-attack vehicles
went after other Hamas strategic positions. Israeli intelligence reported
225 people dead, mostly Hamas military leaders with some functionaries, besides,
and perhaps 400 wounded. The Palestinians announced 300 dead, probably as
a reflex in order to begin their whining about disproportionate Israeli acts
of war. And 600 wounded. [...]

Glenn wastes no time in dressing Peretz down for his “uniquely despicable view” of the recent events.

Israel obviously learned nothing from their war with Lebanon. It’s not about
“very disproportionate, indeed,” contrary to Mr. Peretz’s whining.
It’s about Israel refusing to wake up and deal with the world condemnation,
because Israeli leaders evidently don’t get that Israel is no longer considered
a special case in the Middle East; a country given a pass on behavior for which
any other nation would receive condemnation, starting with the blockade of humanitarian
aid to the Palestinians, which left the people of Gaza in dire straights. Israel
is still viewing their place in the world as the little country who could, instead
of the military and political powerhouse it has become in the world. Israel
is no longer the fledgling democracy it once was and this is no longer the 20th
century. Israel’s right to exist and prosper is no longer in question, except
by the lunatic fanatics who now have the disrespect of the world.

Obama must get beyond people like Peretz, a minority, who continue to use the likes of Ahmadinejad to push a narrative against Israel that most in the world not only do not buy, but wholly reject. Obama’s ability to accomplish this feat will color whatever diplomatic outreach being planned for Tehran.

There is no doubt that Israel has the right to defend herself.

The same can be said for the Palestinians.

…and around we go continually reacting with no solution in sight.

But if you want to stop for a moment to review George W. Bush’s legacy and input into the current crisis, remember it was Bush who pushed elections that manifested the democratic elections that vaulted Hamas to power and leadership, something it’s clear they weren’t prepared to offer.

Where are the grown ups in the Middle East? Will it be President Obama, with and through
the leadership of staunchly pro Israel Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, someone who also believes in a Palestinian state? Can
the new Democratic administration triangulate their diplomatic and military
policy towards Israel and the Palestinians to exact a change? Or will Netanyahu coming back to power signal more of the same, especially with Obama getting lobby pressure from AIPAC out of the gate?

Mr. Peretz says “do not fuck with the Jews,” as Israelis
inspire a third intifada, while tons of bombs continue to explode killing Palestinians
by the dozens, as criticism and outrage towards Israel grows. What will be President Obama’s response? As Biden so frankly put it, “gird your loins.” It’s going to be rough from the jump.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Israel Strikes Hamas in Gaza

–updated–


Hamas press conference on the event.

It really could have only ended this way after the Egypt brokered peace exploded recently. Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni was in Egypt on Christmas Day, warning President Hosni Mubarak that Israel wasn’t going to allow Hamas’ continuous attacks inside Israel without a response.



Livni told Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak that Israel’s patience was exhausted after days of rocket barrages into Israel from Gaza, and that the Israeli government would no longer accept the status quo.

“Hamas needs to understand that our aspiration to live in peace doesn’t mean that Israel is going to take this kind of situation any longer,” Livni said. “Enough is enough and while we are working with the pragmatic leaders, trying to change the situation on the ground in the West Bank, we cannot tolerate a situation in which Hamas continues to target Israel, Israel’s citizens, and this situation is going to be changed.”

Egypt had been hoping to broker a new ceasefire between the Israel and Hamas, after the last one expired six days ago. [...]

This story was in the TM headlines all day yesterday. Just call it foreshadowing of today’s events.

The AP reports Israel stuck Hamas targets after weeks of rocket and mortar fire into Israel from Hamas:



Israeli warplanes retaliating for rocket fire from the Gaza Strip pounded dozens of security compounds across the Hamas-ruled territory in unprecedented waves of airstrikes Saturday, killing nearly 200 people and wounding 270 others in the single bloodiest day of fighting in years.

Most of those killed were security men, but civilians were also among the dead. Hamas said all of its security installations were hit and responded with several medium-range Grad rockets at Israel, reaching deeper than in the past. One Israeli was killed and at least four people were wounded in the rocket attacks. With so many wounded, the Palestinian death toll was likely to rise.

The air offensive followed weeks of intense Palestinian rocket and mortar fire on southern Israel, and Israeli leaders had issued increasingly tough warnings in recent days that they would not tolerate continued attacks. [...]

I actually heard the MSNBC host Alex Witt ask about the possibility of a peace agreement before Bush leaves office. It was surreal. Nobody has done less in the last two decades than the Bush administration to make the Middle East more unstable. That anyone could offer with a straight face any possibility of peace at this point shows the lack of rational deduction utilized when speaking of the Israeli – Palestinian reality we face.

The problem Israel faces is that international public opinion is against them, especially after the blocking of humanitarian aid to the Palestinians. The reality of national self defense is lost on Israeli critics right now, because of what is seen as heavy handedness over the aid issue. Israel is losing the public relations war, even as it fights to protect its own citizens, something that is the first priority of any country’s leaders.

Barack Obama certainly has his hands full when he comes in to office. That’s the real legacy George W. Bush leaves the new president. Is the world any safer after Bush-Cheney? is the real question that should be asked. The answer is obvious.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Little Blue Pill in the Land of Warlords

BY TAYLOR MARSH



Make love, not war.

The K.G.B. used to be the group that traded on sex. Now, according to the Washington Post, it’s the C.I.A.



The Afghan chieftain looked older than his 60-odd years, and his bearded face bore the creases of a man burdened with duties as tribal patriarch and husband to four younger women. His visitor, a CIA officer, saw an opportunity, and reached into his bag for a small gift.

Four blue pills. Viagra.

“Take one of these. You’ll love it,” the officer said. Compliments of Uncle Sam.

The enticement worked. The officer, who described the encounter, returned four days later to an enthusiastic reception. The grinning chief offered up a bonanza of information about Taliban movements and supply routes — followed by a request for more pills. [...]

I cannot tell you how much I’m lovin’ this story. Can it be long before Afghans throw down their guns… their other gun, that is? Seriously, what else could a man with multiple wives need?

Read full story · Comments are closed

Most Admired Woman of 2008



This is the seventh consecutive year that Hillary Clinton has secured top billing as Americans’ Most Admired Woman — and the 13th year she has made the top ten since her first appearance on the list in 1993. The 20% naming Clinton this year is comparable to what she received in 2007 (18%), but falls short of the 28% naming her in 1998. – Gallup

The most admired woman, with the next female half as powerful as Secretary of State designee Hillary Clinton.

That woman, Sarah Palin, has one-sixteenth of Clinton’s experience, intellect and national security knowledge. Palin being mainly a cultural gift to anyone still moored in the 19th century. A woman who was picked for her looks and gender, with her intellect not having anything to do with it. If you want to know the biggest difference between Republican and Democratic ideals where equality is concerned, all you have to do is look at the criteria for women succeeding on the national ticket level. Republicans still believing in appearances for women, as if the presidency is still some beauty pageant for females, vs. Democrats who insist on qualifications for the job. HRC being a fully realized 21st century leader, including in the hardest won area, national security. Not since 1998, the height of the Lewinsky imbroglio, has Hillary Clinton enjoyed such widespread approval. This year her admiration quotient is not based on sympathy, but on the power of her personal political prowess and portfolio, something she’s earned in her own right that reached its height in 2008, but which she has the chance of surpassing once she’s heading the State department.

For those of us who have followed HRC over the years and not just in 2008, her rise comes as no surprise.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Merry Christmas

BY TAYLOR MARSH



Blessings to you and yours from me and mine. …and thank you from the bottom of my heart for making this a stop on your day, during the week, or even monthly. I’m blessed to have you as readers, as well as listeners to my show, over the past year.

Merry Christmas.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Christmas Cartoons

BY TAYLOR MARSH



Topic free for all, folks. Ho. Ho. Ho.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Who Knew? The Gay Is the Rational One!

BY TAYLOR MARSH





Not that he was planning to attend, but Barack Obama should know that my
sister’s inauguration night party — the one for which she was preparing Obama
Punch — has been canceled. The notice went out over the weekend, by e-mail
and word of mouth, that Obama’s choice of Rick Warren to give the inaugural
invocation had simply ruined the party. Warren is anti-gay, and my sister,
not to put too fine a point on it, is not. She’s gay. She is — or was —
a committed Obama supporter. [...] – Richard
Cohen

Mike Rogers turned into Rick Warren’s worst nightmare yesterday. He presented
himself and his community as what they are: a mature, sensitive and intelligent
constituency that is much more powerful than some fringe group, which is how
Warren wants them seen. Out of the gate, Rogers makes the salient point that
Warren has already scrubbed the Saddleback website due to the heat they’ve
gotten over Warren’s lack of sensitivity on civil rights, so it’s already a victory for his community. Rogers appeared tolerant
and even reached out.

On the other hand, representing the religious side, Rev. Eugene Rivers appeared strident, even shrill, as well as the intolerant, abusive, divisive one in the debate, which was seen through his insulting
judgment of Obama’s pick of Warren, which has hurt many more than just the gay community, though they have owned this story, for which they deserve a standing ovation. Contrary to Rivers’ rhetoric, this
is not a “pseudo controversy” that has been “fabricated”
by the “anti-religious left.” Seriously, could this reverend be any
more condescending? Many black religious leaders across this country have been
responsible for promoting homophobia akin to Warren, so let me just say that
I’m not surprised. Their own culpability in ignoring the AIDS epidemic has been
reported time and again, costing the black community dearly, which many were forced to admit publicly to their shame. Rivers’ response is something I’ve come to expect from
religious “leaders” representing organized institutions. Because I
find Warren completely unacceptable to give the invocation at a Democratic presidential
inaugural, I am automatically called the “anti religious left.” Nothing
could be further from the truth. But I’ve been insulted before by Barack Obama’s religious lectures, so it’s again not shocking that the defenders of his Warren decision would do it as well.

The stridency of Reverend Rivers was startling. It’s something you’d expect
from The Gay, right?

But Rogers really turned the table on Rivers when he suggested Warren privately
sit down with the leadership of the lesbian and gay community. Doubting the importance of Warren sitting down with “your particular crew,”
slapped Rivers at the end of the interview, was a perfect exclamation point
on the divisive nature of Warren’s apologists, but also of the disrespect of
religious leaders in this country who are losing their grip on what it means
to be Christian.

Oh, and one last thing. If you’re going to take your lessons on this matter
from Melissa
Ethridge
, please check your criteria for being informed. Ms. Ethridge didn’t
even know who Rick Warren was until he was vaulted to the invocation spot at
Obama’s inaugural, something that will stain the event for many of us. Segue
to Feministing
(h/t april):


Dear Melissa
and Tammy,

You were just hustled by a member of one of America’s oldest fraternities
of snake-oil salesmen: the slick-talking preacher. I’m sorry to have
to tell you this, because it’s clear that you both want to sincerely
move forward into a new era of change with a spirit of openness, trust, and
respect for the differences and disagreements that inevitably divide any group
of 300 million people. You want to believe that Rick Warren really likes you,
really likes gay people, really wants peace and equal rights for everyone
as much as you do. I’m sorry — it’s just not true. He acted
as if he likes you. Maybe he really does at some level. But that doesn’t
change his job, and part of his job is to do things to hurt your family and
families like yours. [...]

That Obama would waste this capital on the likes of Warren in order to reach
the evangelical community not only shows Obama’s arrogance in ignoring a fundamental
issue of Democratic politics, but his willingness to insult the people who put
him where he is today, and I’m not just talking about The Gay.

Disallowing women’s civil rights or that women can lead churches,
including becoming priests, inviting them into the national conversation on
television shows as well, is just another way people like Warren and Rivers
legitimize the patriarchal foundation of organized religion, which simply must be re-envisioned for the 21st century. It’s why, as Rogers states,
people like Warren and Rivers will soon be in the minority in this country.
Young people get it. It’s the old guard (and their apologists) that is keeping divisiveness alive.

That President-elect Obama is not only sanctioning it but reaching out to elevate it and legitimize it is not simply a symbol of supporting this old guard
line. It’s propping up the very bedrock of spiritual conservatism, which just happens to be the foundation of the Republican party. At some point a Democratic leader must summon the courage to challenge the fundamental divisiveness of religious bigotry, not cloak it in the language of “agree to disagree” on the altar of “reaching out.” Anyone who was hoping it would be Obama that would summon this courage will meet January 20th all dressed up and no place to party. Just ask Richard Cohen’s sister. She’s not alone.

However, the bigger problem for Obama is that the Warren disaster is now being compared to Obama’s Rev. Wright issue. Nothing is deadlier for the new president and he has no one to blame but himself.


[...] Now we have a repeat of that episode. This time it is not Obama’s preacher who has decided to honor a bigot, it is Obama himself. And, once again, we get the same sort of rationalizations. Obama says he does not agree with Warren about all things. Obama says he himself is not anti-gay and, in fact, although he does not support same-sex marriage (as opposed to civil unions), he has been a stalwart champion of gay causes. Therefore, it seems to follow, he can honor an anti-gay activist. … – Richard Cohen
Read full story · Comments are closed

A Thank You… Plus A Request

BY TAYLOR MARSH
–updated and bumped–



SUPPORT INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM
You can also use your credit cards through PayPal!

TM NOTE: Just wanted to say thank you to those who have given so far. I hope others will consider jumping in, because I can’t possibly do it without your support. Also remember that there are other ways to support the site, for those who really can’t afford it right now. Posting “In the News,” as well as commenting on posts over there, as well as commenting here, but also emailing my articles around and sharing my writing is another. Just stopping by every day, also visiting my advertisers means a great deal as well. Every little bit counts, whether it’s $5, a comment, or $100 or a monthly “subscription.” It all matters. Thanks so very much.

First, thanks to all of you who have supported this site over the last year. It’s been a great year for me, so I’m really counting my blessings this season.

After staying neutral, then moving to support Hillary, things really took off. Then after she didn’t prevail, it was hard, but following her lead was easy. I never doubted where we were going.

Then Barack won.

In between it all I was praised, vilified, called every name in the book in headline posts and diaries, but I never flinched. …and President-elect Obama didn’t let us down either. Hillary as Secretary of State was the move of the year for many of us. All along I was there, giving the best political analysis I knew how, no matter what was being hurled in my direction. I just cackled and kept on going.

So thanks to all of you who stopped by daily, weekly, even monthly, as well as all of you who comment every day. But a very special thanks for those of you who supported my work financially. It’s getting more competitive out here and even with advertising, the work I do, including the travel, is expensive. I simply cannot keep this blog going without your financial support.

For 2009 I’m requesting something of those who can. A regular donation. Of course it’s voluntary, but every month if you can. Let’s call it a sort of “subscription.”. Whatever you can give, $5, $10, $50, even more for those of you who can afford it. I simply will not be able to keep this blog going without your help, though I’m always hoping some day this reality will shift. …and I know how hard it is on everyone right now, believe me.

Again, thanks to all of you who have been there over this year; some of you here for years, even you newcomers. The commitment never waivers, even when you don’t agree with me. I will always work to be worthy of your trust, your readership (and when I’m on the air, TV or radio), with many new things in store for next year.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Save of the Year

BY TAYLOR MARSH


Michael Calderone writes about the top ten media blunders of 2008. Number three has got to be my favorite, complete with “Daily Show” clip. But this isn’t one of them, because it belongs in the big win category.

Nobody in news was heading faster downhill than Katie Couric. From 2007 onward, the reviews were bad, especially the interview with the Edwardses, with Ms. Couric rumored to have one foot out the door. As far as I could tell she’d proved only one thing: She was in over her head.

Then along came a woman named Sarah.

The McCain campaign thought Katie didn’t have it, so they served little Sarah up.

Deftly, transparently, and kindly, Couric revealed Palin in an interview that changed the trajectory of Sarah Palin’s power, ignited a bomb under John McCain, and brought the CBS news anchor the respect she couldn’t buy with all the built in gravitas of the nightly news desk. The genius of the interview was that Couric let Palin do all the work.

Onlookers did a cartoon double take.

Sarah looked like an ignorant fool answering questions from Couric that didn’t go anywhere near gotcha, with an outcome no one expected. It was the beginning of the Palin unraveling.

Now Ms. Couric gets a new chance to prove she can handle the nightly news anchor spot. We’ll have to wait to see what develops from here, but Couric made it happen herself and caught everyone off guard, no one more so than the McCain camp. It wounded the Republican presidential ticket like a switchblade slice, from which Palin never recovered. It was simply dubbed “The Couric Interview.” When people talk about it we all know we’re talking about the day Palin went down. The day Couric finally got her pay off.

It is quite simply the save of the year.

Read full story · Comments are closed

A Shout Out to Our Armed Forces Wherever You May Be

BY TAYLOR MARSH



This is to say “Merry Christmas” and “Thank You” to all of the women and men serving in our Armed Forces, whatever branch, wherever you serve around the world. The video above is a flashback that is shown in the spirit of also remembering our veterans of Vietnam, as well as veterans who served wherever and whenever.

We never forget your sacrifice.

We never forget what you have endured, the revolving tours, the endless danger, as well as the horrific lack of planning that will inevitably lead you from Iraq back to Afghanistan, as well as to the dangerous minefields of Central Asia. So many dangerous territories left to fester under incompetent civilian leadership. We know you get the leading edge of that spear.

And for all of you who serve silently, covertly, the SOF, but also the unsung heroes of the clandestine services, all of whom are involved in fighting and gathering intel on the asymmetric threats we face in the 21st century, we say “Thank You.”

So many of you will not be home for Christmas and weren’t home for Thanksgiving either. At our house, we will lift a glass to salute all you do for this great country, but also for nothing less than your work to manifest peace in this world. Our pledge to you is to keep fighting the word war, the propaganda war, as well as the unending rhetoric against diplomacy and detente, which can bring back an equilibrium, however taut, something we haven’t seen in over eight years.

With a new Administration coming in, we intend to at the very least offer a better battle plan, including muscular diplomacy, so that you are not the only effort on the front lines. There is more to peace than warfare. More to progress than can be utilized through weaponry. More to world alliances than building military budgets. At some point we all must be willing to live with each other amidst our differences, no matter how great.



“World peace, like community peace, does not require that each man love his neighbor — it requires that they live together in mutual tolerance, submitting their disputes to a just and peaceful settlement.” – President John F. Kennedy

Merry Christmas to you all, blessing as well to your families. You will stay in our prayers. Thank you for your courage and endless service.

Read full story · Comments are closed

It’s the Most Wonderful Time of the Year

BY TAYLOR MARSH



Vice President Cheney makes the same argument Nixon made. If the prez does it it’s legal. Of course, it was said on Fox:



WALLACE: This is at the core of the controversies that I want to get to with you in a moment. If the president during war decides to do something to protect the country, is it legal?

CHENEY: General proposition, I’d say yes. You need to be more specific than that. I mean — but clearly, when you take the oath of office on January 20th of 2001, as we did, you take the oath to support and defend and protect the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

The whole interview is worth a watch or read.

One more month and this crew is gone. That’s just another reason it’s the most wonderful time of the year. Can’t get rid of George and Dick fast enough.

Read full story · Comments are closed

In Our World


Taj
and Trident Tower reopen
, but not the Oberoi which will take another seven
months or so.


An unsmiling policeman stood behind sandbags, rifle poised. If the metal
detector beeped, a polite staffer requested guests to have their bags checked.

Besides the security, on Saturday, a day before the Trident reopened, it felt
like the most brazen terror attack on India never happened.

[...] On the fringes of the crowd were those who see the Taj every day. Prakash
Chavan, who has been selling peanuts outside the Taj for 15 years, said: “I
can’t afford to walk into the hotel, but when they reopen their doors,
I’ll clap proudly.”

Cheers to India. Never let down. Never let the thugs win.

Iraq’s parliament has dealt
al-Maliki a serious defeat
. Sadr is smiling.


Iraq’s parliament has rejected a draft law that would have permitted forces
from the UK, Australia and a number of other countries to remain after 2008.

The bill, rejected by 80 votes to 68, would have given the 6,000 non-US troops
a legal basis for staying once the UN mandate expires on 31 December.

It will now be sent back to the cabinet for amendment. A vote is due next
week. [...]

It’s bad enough the Brits were demeaned to this lower agreement, but now that
Sadr has successfully defeated it that means the non U.S. forces could basically
be kicked out of Iraq. Juan
Cole
has more.

The shoe thrower was beaten, according to reports by the Guardian.


he Iraqi journalist who hurled his shoes at President George Bush was viciously beaten after being taken into custody, according to a police officer who accompanied him to prison.

Wrestled to the ground and then buried under a frantic mound of security officers, Muntazer al-Zaidi was last seen being dragged into detention. Controversy has since raged over what treatment was meted out to the man hailed a hero in many parts of the Arab and Muslim world for his protest against the invasion of Iraq. Yesterday there were further demonstrations in the Middle East calling for his immediate release. …

The story of the
Israeli blockade of the Gaza Strip
hardly makes the news in the U.S. It’s
indicative of our blindness to the suffering of the Palestinians. As good a
friends as we are with Israel, which is as it should be. If that is really true
then it’s time for us to tell our friends enough.


Impoverished Palestinians on the Gaza Strip are being forced to scavenge
for food on rubbish dumps to survive as Israel’s economic blockade risks causing
irreversible damage, according to international observers.

[...]The figures collected by the UN agency show that 51.8% – an “unprecedentedly
high” number of Gaza’s 1.5 million population – are now living below
the poverty line. The agency announced last week that it had been forced to
stop distributing food rations to the 750,000 people in need and had also
suspended cash distributions to 94,000 of the most disadvantaged who were
unable to afford the high prices being asked for smuggled food. …

Our problems with the Arab and Muslim world will not be solved until we give a little tough love to our Israeli friends.
The situation in Gaza is something no one should countenance. Will Barack and Clinton have the spine to do it together? They make the right team.

Settlements and the Palestinians, will we ever find a reconcilable medium?
At least PM Brown is making a concerted effort, one of the few. It’s a never
ending quagmire that awaits Obama. Our national security is tied up in it.


The international community must do more to hold Israel accountable – particularly
on its accelerated West Bank settlement construction – if peace efforts are
to have a chance, Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Salaam Fayad said in
an interview Saturday.

[...] However, in recent months, Fayad has tried a new approach, proposing
practical steps in which European countries could help curb settlement expansion.

In May, he wrote to 27 EU nations, proposing the link between an upgrade
in Israel-EU ties and halting settlement construction. Fayad also exchanged
letters with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown who said he wants to make
sure products from West Bank settlements are denied favorable EU tariffs.

Under a 2003 agreement between Israel and the EU, settlement products must
be clearly labeled. Brown wrote Dec. 9 that he wants to make sure the agreement
is implemented effectively “and any abuse of the system fully investigated.”
Brown also wrote that he’s looking into ways to discourage British citizens
from buying property in settlements. [...]

As the 21st century unfolds, Russia goes backwards to the bad old days. George
W. Bush looked into Putin’s soul, but was too ignorant to see the darkness. Bush ignored Russia, which is odd considering Condi’s historical prowess on all things Soviet. Treason
is now being expanded
to include talking to journalists as a possible punishable
offense.


In a country where government critics already feel vulnerable, legislation
to expand the definition of treason has inspired a new round of hand-wringing
about how far the state will go to rein in dissenters and regulate Russians’
contact with foreigners.

Even certain conversations with a foreign reporter could be “considered
treason under the new legislation,” contended Ernst Chyorny, the leader
of a human rights group in Moscow, because they could be seen as “consultative”
support to a foreign entity. And that, he says, could land a violator in prison
for as long as 20 years. [...]

China
sends navy vessels
to fight pirates off of the Horn of Africa.

Iran
sends warships
to battle the pirates off of Somalia as well.

In the plot thickens, Lebanon
now has an ambassador to Syria
. Yep, that’s right. It coincides with another
tale I’ll tell you after the jump.


Lebanon appointed an ambassador to Syria on Saturday, the first time the
Arab neighbours will have full diplomatic relations since gaining independence
from France in the 1940s.

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad had issued a decree in October to establish
diplomatic relations with Lebanon, with whom bilateral ties have thawed since
the end of a Lebanese political crisis in May. [...]

Now before going on, this exchange was expected “before the end of the
year.” They made it by a week. But that’s not the thing to watch.

The real
story is the pending trial at the international court at The Hague regarding
the assassination of Rafiq al-Hariri of Lebanon. After
judges being replaced, deaths, disappearances, witness protection and every
other manner of mob like threats, the beginning of the most dangerous part is near. All signs
are revealing the Assad government had a hand in the assassination, which doesn’t shock anyone who follows this region. The Atlantic lays it out in their December issue: Getting
Away With Murder?
This will be yet another swirling wind President Obama will have around him in the coming year.

There is
much talk that even though many facts point to Assad and the people around him, including his brother-in-law, as well as generals in Lebanon, with things as tenuous as they are
in the region, the question is being asked whether the fall of Assad is something
anyone can afford. You likely know where I’m going. In order to save the Syrian
government, people around him could be held up, not exactly patsies but not the head of the snake, which would save Great Britain, the U.S., Israel, etc. from having to deal with the aftermath of Assad falling. The reality is that an assassination of this magnitude would need the backing of a state, with Assad the person at the top. But wait! There’s an on the other hand. What
will the majority Sunni in Syria do if it’s seen that people who planned al-Hariri’s
assassination (likely Shia) are not held accountable? Quite a dangerous situation, with the trial in early in 2009. We’ll see who has the courage to demand justice for the Lebanese people,
as well as for “Mr. Lebanon,” who clearly was more than just a politician to the people.
That’s why he’s dead, with his son in hiding for his life.

Read full story · Comments are closed

No Wonder Rush is Partial to Palin

BY TAYLOR MARSH

Oldie but a GOP goodie.


From Alaska we find out part of the story.:


Little additional information was available Friday on the case as authorities
remained unusually tight-lipped about details. But Palmer court records listed
her scheduled court date and a troopers spokeswoman said in a release late
Friday afternoon that the charges “are in relation to the drug
oxycontin.”
[..]

Maybe now Rush will now wipe the drool off the EIB microphone and revisit the world
of reality. I’m not holding my breath. Cheap shot, I know, but it bears reminding that wingnut radio really leads the Republican party. Palin in 2012!

Topic free for all. You’re up. I’m out a holiday-ing! HO. Ho. ho!

Read full story · Comments are closed