<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: From &#8216;Spending Bill&#8217; to &#8216;Splat&#8217;</title> <atom:link href="http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/</link> <description>Taylor Marsh - News, Political Analysis, Foreign Policy, and  Independent Political Opinion on Progressive Politics</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:01:25 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: texan4hillary</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427984</link> <dc:creator>texan4hillary</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:36:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427984</guid> <description>im glad speaker pelosi gets it-we won the repubs lost. so yeah tere is money needed for hiv prevention and pell grants but u know what-the gop lost. the gop funded the iraq wr. destroyed the remains of the great society.obama has defended today the house bill. he said this morning i won. the gop wont cooperate. why co-opt this package with tax cuts to begin is fuming. a real bill would be a trillion on jbs for all ameicans. as the nyt op ed says today-the obama team admits this and we will need another very soon. madisonian govt i hope is returnng. congress must be assertive. we have no kings.if obama wants something then he must consult congress.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im glad speaker pelosi gets it-we won the repubs lost. so yeah tere is money needed for hiv prevention and pell grants but u know what-the gop lost. the gop funded the iraq wr. destroyed the remains of the great society.obama has defended today the house bill. he said this morning i won. the gop wont cooperate. why co-opt this package with tax cuts to begin is fuming. a real bill would be a trillion on jbs for all ameicans. as the nyt op ed says today-the obama team admits this and we will need another very soon. madisonian govt i hope is returnng. congress must be assertive. we have no kings.if obama wants something then he must consult congress.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ogenec</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427942</link> <dc:creator>ogenec</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:32:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427942</guid> <description>GeoT says:
04 February 2009 at 12:11 pmthey have no intention of participating in “governing in a sensible, non-ideological way.” So you’ve got one hand clapping…GeoT and JA, I agree that some -- maybe even many -- Republicans have no intention of working with us.  But if you read the WaPost story I linked to, it&#039;s clear that some do.  Olympia Snowe for one.  I think McCain can also be brought over.  Maybe even Tom Coburn!  Same goes for moderate Democrats, who also are queasy about this bill.  Every dollar we spend now will have to be financed.  So it&#039;s imperative we spent $$ only on things that stimulate the economy, and the quicker the better.  Otherwise, we are just borrowing from Peter to pay Paul.LL, I agree that at the margin, some of the things I mentioned are stimulative.  The Senate should definitely debate those.  But many of them are not, and they need to be axed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GeoT says:<br
/> 04 February 2009 at 12:11 pm</p><p>they have no intention of participating in “governing in a sensible, non-ideological way.” So you’ve got one hand clapping…</p><p>GeoT and JA, I agree that some &#8212; maybe even many &#8212; Republicans have no intention of working with us.  But if you read the WaPost story I linked to, it&#8217;s clear that some do.  Olympia Snowe for one.  I think McCain can also be brought over.  Maybe even Tom Coburn!  Same goes for moderate Democrats, who also are queasy about this bill.  Every dollar we spend now will have to be financed.  So it&#8217;s imperative we spent $$ only on things that stimulate the economy, and the quicker the better.  Otherwise, we are just borrowing from Peter to pay Paul.</p><p>LL, I agree that at the margin, some of the things I mentioned are stimulative.  The Senate should definitely debate those.  But many of them are not, and they need to be axed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GeoT</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427938</link> <dc:creator>GeoT</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:11:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427938</guid> <description>ogenec says:
04 February 2009 at 11:58 amSo this is not about Democrats versus Republicans, or whether Obama has the balls to steamroll opponents. It is about his promise to govern in a sensible, non-ideological way. Americans are holding him to that promise, and properly so
_______The first thing Michael Steele did was position the Republicans in an adversarial posture:http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/04/us/politics/03web-nagourney.html?_r=3they have no intention of participating in &quot;governing in a sensible, non-ideological way.&quot; So you&#039;ve got one hand clapping...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ogenec says:<br
/> 04 February 2009 at 11:58 am</p><p>So this is not about Democrats versus Republicans, or whether Obama has the balls to steamroll opponents. It is about his promise to govern in a sensible, non-ideological way. Americans are holding him to that promise, and properly so<br
/> _______</p><p>The first thing Michael Steele did was position the Republicans in an adversarial posture:</p><p><a
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/04/us/politics/03web-nagourney.html?_r=3" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/04/us/politics/03web-nagourney.html?_r=3</a></p><p>they have no intention of participating in &#8220;governing in a sensible, non-ideological way.&#8221; So you&#8217;ve got one hand clapping&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taylor Marsh</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427937</link> <dc:creator>Taylor Marsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:05:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427937</guid> <description>Afternoon, folks. New thread...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Afternoon, folks. New thread&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lake Lady</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427936</link> <dc:creator>Lake Lady</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:05:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427936</guid> <description>I just got my first communication from McCaskill since working on her campaign. Patting herself on the back for her recent comments...and...oh yeah ...asking for a contribution.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got my first communication from McCaskill since working on her campaign. Patting herself on the back for her recent comments&#8230;and&#8230;oh yeah &#8230;asking for a contribution.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jane Austen</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427935</link> <dc:creator>Jane Austen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:04:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427935</guid> <description>So this is not about Democrats versus Republicans, or whether Obama has the balls to steamroll opponents. It is about his promise to govern in a sensible, non-ideological way. Americans are holding him to that promise, and properly so.ogenec - I might agree with you if the Repubs weren&#039;t going to stick to their ideology.  They will and there are Repubs up here who are absolutely gleeful about the negative comments about the stim package and actually hoping as Rush does, that Obama fails.  They do not want change.  They want the status quo and that means playing to the money interests.  Obama may want smart, non-ideological and sensible governing but the majority of Repubs are not about to let that happen.  They&#039;d rather throw out the baby with the bath water.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this is not about Democrats versus Republicans, or whether Obama has the balls to steamroll opponents. It is about his promise to govern in a sensible, non-ideological way. Americans are holding him to that promise, and properly so.</p><p>ogenec &#8211; I might agree with you if the Repubs weren&#8217;t going to stick to their ideology.  They will and there are Repubs up here who are absolutely gleeful about the negative comments about the stim package and actually hoping as Rush does, that Obama fails.  They do not want change.  They want the status quo and that means playing to the money interests.  Obama may want smart, non-ideological and sensible governing but the majority of Repubs are not about to let that happen.  They&#8217;d rather throw out the baby with the bath water.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GeoT</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427934</link> <dc:creator>GeoT</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:03:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427934</guid> <description>Lake Lady says:
04 February 2009 at 11:57 amThanks Geo…you understand I need instructions step by step:)
_____also: you need to use the same email address as you use on blog sites for the avatars to work.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lake Lady says:<br
/> 04 February 2009 at 11:57 am</p><p>Thanks Geo…you understand I need instructions step by step:)<br
/> _____</p><p>also: you need to use the same email address as you use on blog sites for the avatars to work.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lake Lady</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427933</link> <dc:creator>Lake Lady</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:03:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427933</guid> <description>Great post Ogenic....however, increasing wildlife management would mean hiring more people to do it, and upgrading computers would sell computers,keeping people employed. Not all of the out of work are construction workers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Ogenic&#8230;.however, increasing wildlife management would mean hiring more people to do it, and upgrading computers would sell computers,keeping people employed. Not all of the out of work are construction workers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ogenec</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427932</link> <dc:creator>ogenec</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:58:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427932</guid> <description>Obama promised us not small government, not big government, but smart government.  Obama&#039;s actions need to match the strength of his rhetoric.  Which means that this bill should not pass until the fat is trimmed from it.Obama&#039;s biggest problem in the Senate is not Republicans, it&#039;s his fellow Democrats: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/03/AR2009020304024.html?hpid=topnewsWhat do these things have to do with stimulus: $1.1 billion for comparative medical research, $350 million for Agriculture Department computers, $75 million to discourage smoking, $20 million in Interior Department funding, $400 million for HIV screening and $650 million for wildlife management?  The answer is: NOTHING.I did not expect much restraint from Congressional Democrats.  But as Washington said, the senate is the saucer to the House&#039;s cup: we pour legislation into the senatorial saucer to cool it.  The Senate will cut a lot of this non-stimulus spending out, boost infrastructure spending, and the resulting bill will pass both houses with wide margins.So this is not about Democrats versus Republicans, or whether Obama has the balls to steamroll opponents.  It is about his promise to govern in a sensible, non-ideological way.  Americans are holding him to that promise, and properly so.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama promised us not small government, not big government, but smart government.  Obama&#8217;s actions need to match the strength of his rhetoric.  Which means that this bill should not pass until the fat is trimmed from it.</p><p>Obama&#8217;s biggest problem in the Senate is not Republicans, it&#8217;s his fellow Democrats: <a
href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/03/AR2009020304024.html?hpid=topnews" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/03/AR2009020304024.html?hpid=topnews</a></p><p>What do these things have to do with stimulus: $1.1 billion for comparative medical research, $350 million for Agriculture Department computers, $75 million to discourage smoking, $20 million in Interior Department funding, $400 million for HIV screening and $650 million for wildlife management?  The answer is: NOTHING.</p><p>I did not expect much restraint from Congressional Democrats.  But as Washington said, the senate is the saucer to the House&#8217;s cup: we pour legislation into the senatorial saucer to cool it.  The Senate will cut a lot of this non-stimulus spending out, boost infrastructure spending, and the resulting bill will pass both houses with wide margins.</p><p>So this is not about Democrats versus Republicans, or whether Obama has the balls to steamroll opponents.  It is about his promise to govern in a sensible, non-ideological way.  Americans are holding him to that promise, and properly so.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lake Lady</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427931</link> <dc:creator>Lake Lady</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:57:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427931</guid> <description>Thanks Geo...you understand I need instructions step by step:)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Geo&#8230;you understand I need instructions step by step:)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GeoT</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427930</link> <dc:creator>GeoT</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:54:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427930</guid> <description>Lake Lady says:
04 February 2009 at 11:46 amI signed up at wordpress now how do I do gravatar? Google it?
_____sign-in @ wordpress.com go to &quot;my account&quot; (upper left) and select &quot;edit profile&quot; &quot;Gravatar&quot; box is upper right</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lake Lady says:<br
/> 04 February 2009 at 11:46 am</p><p>I signed up at wordpress now how do I do gravatar? Google it?<br
/> _____</p><p>sign-in @ wordpress.com go to &#8220;my account&#8221; (upper left) and select &#8220;edit profile&#8221; &#8220;Gravatar&#8221; box is upper right</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kris</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427929</link> <dc:creator>kris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:54:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427929</guid> <description>LL - and angelachel was right on.Sometimes I think we&#039;d be better off with a Repub congress and Obama as President. It might be easier to compromise and get things done. Look what happened when Clinton faced a Republican congress. They did get things done and we were all in pretty damn good shape.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LL &#8211; and angelachel was right on.</p><p>Sometimes I think we&#8217;d be better off with a Repub congress and Obama as President. It might be easier to compromise and get things done. Look what happened when Clinton faced a Republican congress. They did get things done and we were all in pretty damn good shape.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lake Lady</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427928</link> <dc:creator>Lake Lady</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:54:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427928</guid> <description>Didn&#039;t Pajama Media just go belly up?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t Pajama Media just go belly up?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lake Lady</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427927</link> <dc:creator>Lake Lady</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:50:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427927</guid> <description>Jane, Angelachel wrote about that during the primary. Her argument was that Hillary understood the use of power better.She has not been writing for awhile but it is probably still in her archives.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jane, Angelachel wrote about that during the primary. Her argument was that Hillary understood the use of power better.She has not been writing for awhile but it is probably still in her archives.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GeoT</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427926</link> <dc:creator>GeoT</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:48:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427926</guid> <description>GeoT - what worries me is that Obama is more in tune to persuasion rather than strong arming and I wonder if he has that ability. ----- Like I said - we need to take this country back for us. As Taylor’s banner says - “We the people.
________Time will tell on his ability to be more agressive, and I&#039;m hoping in the meantime Rahm is kicking some butt in the background. Obama needs to get his act together but Democrats in general need to decide a direction and go full steam ahead.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GeoT &#8211; what worries me is that Obama is more in tune to persuasion rather than strong arming and I wonder if he has that ability. &#8212;&#8211; Like I said &#8211; we need to take this country back for us. As Taylor’s banner says &#8211; “We the people.<br
/> ________</p><p>Time will tell on his ability to be more agressive, and I&#8217;m hoping in the meantime Rahm is kicking some butt in the background. Obama needs to get his act together but Democrats in general need to decide a direction and go full steam ahead.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kris</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427925</link> <dc:creator>kris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:47:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427925</guid> <description>Obama said a couple of days ago if the economy doesn&#039;t improve that he is a one term President. He gets it so the Congress better get it quick. I do believe there are elections next year.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama said a couple of days ago if the economy doesn&#8217;t improve that he is a one term President. He gets it so the Congress better get it quick. I do believe there are elections next year.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jane Austen</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427924</link> <dc:creator>Jane Austen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:47:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427924</guid> <description>Betsy says:
04 February 2009 at 11:41 am
Gee JA, he now thinks that he’s “all knowledgeable” now that Pajama Media sent him to Israel.Bets - if that&#039;s the name of the media firm (I don&#039;t get into this stuff too much because I get frustrated when I read some of the stuff out there, and pissed)that says alot for them and the type of &quot;intellectual&quot; that they employ.  Ugh!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Betsy says:<br
/> 04 February 2009 at 11:41 am<br
/> Gee JA, he now thinks that he’s “all knowledgeable” now that Pajama Media sent him to Israel.</p><p>Bets &#8211; if that&#8217;s the name of the media firm (I don&#8217;t get into this stuff too much because I get frustrated when I read some of the stuff out there, and pissed)that says alot for them and the type of &#8220;intellectual&#8221; that they employ.  Ugh!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lake Lady</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427923</link> <dc:creator>Lake Lady</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:46:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427923</guid> <description>Ha! Geo...Stockholm Syndrome....my sister-in-law suffers from that, after years of living with my brother and having Faux News on in the background. She is irrational about the Clintons.I signed up at wordpress now how do I do gravatar? Google it?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! Geo&#8230;Stockholm Syndrome&#8230;.my sister-in-law suffers from that, after years of living with my brother and having Faux News on in the background. She is irrational about the Clintons.</p><p>I signed up at wordpress now how do I do gravatar? Google it?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kris</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427922</link> <dc:creator>kris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:45:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427922</guid> <description>Exactly right angels. Hope he has the courage to do it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly right angels. Hope he has the courage to do it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jane Austen</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427921</link> <dc:creator>Jane Austen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:44:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427921</guid> <description>GeoT says:
04 February 2009 at 11:37 am
Betsy says:
04 February 2009 at 11:29 amI just wish he would now tell the Repubs that he tried to work with them and it didn’t work so “I won, get over it.”
______I think he said something to that effect this morning._________GeoT - what worries me is that Obama is more in tune to persuasion rather than strong arming and I wonder if he has that ability.  Some times you have to use &quot;brute force&quot; just like LBJ did with Civil Rights.  I know what you&#039;re going to say - that LBJ lost the South when he did that but these are different times and people are hurting so if Obama uses some &quot;brute force&quot; I don&#039;t think too many Americans are going to hold that against him especially if he gets the economy up and running again.  If he doesn&#039;t this country is done for because we&#039;ll become a country where the &quot;minority elite&quot; rule the serfs.  Sorry that&#039;s the way I see it.  Like I said - we need to take this country back for us.  As Taylor&#039;s banner says - &quot;We the people.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GeoT says:<br
/> 04 February 2009 at 11:37 am<br
/> Betsy says:<br
/> 04 February 2009 at 11:29 am</p><p>I just wish he would now tell the Repubs that he tried to work with them and it didn’t work so “I won, get over it.”<br
/> ______</p><p>I think he said something to that effect this morning.</p><p>_________</p><p>GeoT &#8211; what worries me is that Obama is more in tune to persuasion rather than strong arming and I wonder if he has that ability.  Some times you have to use &#8220;brute force&#8221; just like LBJ did with Civil Rights.  I know what you&#8217;re going to say &#8211; that LBJ lost the South when he did that but these are different times and people are hurting so if Obama uses some &#8220;brute force&#8221; I don&#8217;t think too many Americans are going to hold that against him especially if he gets the economy up and running again.  If he doesn&#8217;t this country is done for because we&#8217;ll become a country where the &#8220;minority elite&#8221; rule the serfs.  Sorry that&#8217;s the way I see it.  Like I said &#8211; we need to take this country back for us.  As Taylor&#8217;s banner says &#8211; &#8220;We the people.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: angels81</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427920</link> <dc:creator>angels81</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:42:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427920</guid> <description>Kris, I agree, its time that Obama gets control of the Democrats. He needs to take Pelosi and Reid to the woodshed and let them know that if they ever want to see anything that,s close to their hearts signed into law, they had better get on board. Democrats are in the position they are in because of Obama and not because the people thought Democrats were doing such a great job in congress.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kris, I agree, its time that Obama gets control of the Democrats. He needs to take Pelosi and Reid to the woodshed and let them know that if they ever want to see anything that,s close to their hearts signed into law, they had better get on board. Democrats are in the position they are in because of Obama and not because the people thought Democrats were doing such a great job in congress.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GeoT</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427919</link> <dc:creator>GeoT</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:41:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427919</guid> <description>re: limiting CEO&#039;s salaries to $500,000:John Thain&#039;s (CEO of  Merrill Lynch) Driver Made $230,000: Reporthttp://tinyurl.com/aersyk</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: limiting CEO&#8217;s salaries to $500,000:</p><p>John Thain&#8217;s (CEO of  Merrill Lynch) Driver Made $230,000: Report</p><p><a
href="http://tinyurl.com/aersyk" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/aersyk</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Betsy</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427918</link> <dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:41:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427918</guid> <description>Gee JA, he now thinks that he&#039;s &quot;all knowledgeable&quot; now that Pajama Media sent him to Israel.  ;-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee JA, he now thinks that he&#8217;s &#8220;all knowledgeable&#8221; now that Pajama Media sent him to Israel. <img
src='http://taylormarsh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jane Austen</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427917</link> <dc:creator>Jane Austen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:39:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427917</guid> <description>angels81 says:
04 February 2009 at 11:36 am
Jane, Pelosi has been one of the biggest disappointments for Democrats. She has done as much damage to the stimulus package then all the repugs put together. She is an old, divide and rule politician who cares only about power and party. She is no different then bush type repugs.And believe me when I say this - the Repubs see this and will use it their advantage.  Pelosi, who was so for Obama during the primaries and GE, is playing right into their hands.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>angels81 says:<br
/> 04 February 2009 at 11:36 am<br
/> Jane, Pelosi has been one of the biggest disappointments for Democrats. She has done as much damage to the stimulus package then all the repugs put together. She is an old, divide and rule politician who cares only about power and party. She is no different then bush type repugs.</p><p>And believe me when I say this &#8211; the Repubs see this and will use it their advantage.  Pelosi, who was so for Obama during the primaries and GE, is playing right into their hands.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GeoT</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427916</link> <dc:creator>GeoT</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:37:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427916</guid> <description>Betsy says:
04 February 2009 at 11:29 amI just wish he would now tell the Repubs that he tried to work with them and it didn’t work so “I won, get over it.”
______I think he said something to that effect this morning.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Betsy says:<br
/> 04 February 2009 at 11:29 am</p><p>I just wish he would now tell the Repubs that he tried to work with them and it didn’t work so “I won, get over it.”<br
/> ______</p><p>I think he said something to that effect this morning.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jane Austen</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427915</link> <dc:creator>Jane Austen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:37:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427915</guid> <description>Audiegrl says:
04 February 2009 at 11:33 am
Joe the Plumber is going to the Hill to advise the Repubs on the Stimulus package. I couldn’t make this stuff up…LOLI guess everyone needs his/her 15 minutes of fame although I think JTP has exceeded his 15 minutes and I&#039;m really sick of him.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Audiegrl says:<br
/> 04 February 2009 at 11:33 am<br
/> Joe the Plumber is going to the Hill to advise the Repubs on the Stimulus package. I couldn’t make this stuff up…LOL</p><p>I guess everyone needs his/her 15 minutes of fame although I think JTP has exceeded his 15 minutes and I&#8217;m really sick of him.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: angels81</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427914</link> <dc:creator>angels81</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:36:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427914</guid> <description>Jane, Pelosi has been one of the biggest disappointments for Democrats. She has done as much damage to the stimulus package then all the repugs put together. She is an old, divide and rule politician who cares only about power and party. She is no different then bush type repugs.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jane, Pelosi has been one of the biggest disappointments for Democrats. She has done as much damage to the stimulus package then all the repugs put together. She is an old, divide and rule politician who cares only about power and party. She is no different then bush type repugs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kris</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427913</link> <dc:creator>kris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:36:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427913</guid> <description>Well angels I have expressed my feelings about Pelosi and Reid for sometime. They are shameful in my opinion. Pelosi did not do the President any favors by moving that piece of crap &quot;stimulus bill&quot; through the House. Obama needs to rein them in quickly.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well angels I have expressed my feelings about Pelosi and Reid for sometime. They are shameful in my opinion. Pelosi did not do the President any favors by moving that piece of crap &#8220;stimulus bill&#8221; through the House. Obama needs to rein them in quickly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jane Austen</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427912</link> <dc:creator>Jane Austen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427912</guid> <description>GeoT says:
04 February 2009 at 11:30 amagree! seed money for industries that will grow and create jobs… a redirected auto industry that innovates, and modernize the power grid… just to name a few.There&#039;s too much emphasis on big business.  And there are all kinds of jobs and innovative avenues to follow without bowing to the Repubs with huge tax cuts for big business.  I just don&#039;t trust that part of the stimulus package.  This stimulus package should be about putting Americans back to work in good paying jobs, and please don&#039;t offer any &quot;hamburger flipping&quot; jobs at minimum wage.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GeoT says:<br
/> 04 February 2009 at 11:30 am</p><p>agree! seed money for industries that will grow and create jobs… a redirected auto industry that innovates, and modernize the power grid… just to name a few.</p><p>There&#8217;s too much emphasis on big business.  And there are all kinds of jobs and innovative avenues to follow without bowing to the Repubs with huge tax cuts for big business.  I just don&#8217;t trust that part of the stimulus package.  This stimulus package should be about putting Americans back to work in good paying jobs, and please don&#8217;t offer any &#8220;hamburger flipping&#8221; jobs at minimum wage.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Audiegrl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/02/from-spending-bill-to-splat/comment-page-1/#comment-427911</link> <dc:creator>Audiegrl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:33:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=29028#comment-427911</guid> <description>Joe the Plumber is going to the Hill to advise the Repubs on the Stimulus package.  I couldn&#039;t make this stuff up...LOL  :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe the Plumber is going to the Hill to advise the Repubs on the Stimulus package.  I couldn&#8217;t make this stuff up&#8230;LOL <img
src='http://taylormarsh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 1285/1379 objects using memcached

Served from: taylormarsh.com @ 2012-02-10 11:03:32 -->
