TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Archive | February, 2009

Obama Unveils Plan to Fight Home Foreclosures

Moving right along, on the bailout/stimulus efforts from the Obama administration, President Obama unveiled a $75 billion plan today geared to help millions of “homeowners refinance their mortgages or avert foreclosure.” The initiative Obama said  ”would shore up distressed housing prices, stabilize neighborhoods and slow a downward spiral that he said was ‘unraveling homeownership, the middle class, and the American Dream itself.’”

Speaking at a high school gymnasium in Mesa, AZ, Obama told the crowd, “This plan will not save every home, but it will give millions of families resigned to financial ruin a chance to rebuild. It will prevent the worst consequences of this crisis from wreaking even greater havoc on the economy. And by bringing down the foreclosure rate, it will help to shore up housing prices for everyone.”

The plan has three basic components. One would help homeowners who continue to make loan payments on time, but are paying high interest rates and would otherwise not be able to refinance because they do not have enough equity or their houses are worth less than they borrowed. A second would assist people who are at risk of foreclosure by providing incentives to lenders to alter the terms of loans to make them substantially more affordable to struggling homeowners. The third would try to assure there is plenty of credit available for mortgages by giving $200 billion of additional financial backing to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two government-controlled mortgage finance companies.

The new plan will officially take effect on March 4, when the Obama administration will publish the detailed rules to explain it. The NY Times notes that “most of the plan can be enacted by Mr. Obama though his executive powers, although part of it — including changing the bankruptcy laws to allow homeowners to seek changes to their mortgages through bankruptcy proceedings — will require legislation.”

The White House Blog has a lot more info here. Personally, I prefer seeing this sort of bailout, the kind that helps Americans and not corporations. Nothing is going to fix this colossal  economic mess overnight, but there is a sense that far more is being done by the Obama administration to fix this mess than we ever got from fool that left us with it.

Read full story · Comments { 30 }

GM Wants More Bailout

On Tuesday after President Obama signed the stimulus bill, General Motors and Chrysler jumped up and asked the federal government for another another $14 billion in bailout funds. In return for more bailout from the goverment, both companies “promised to make further drastic cuts to all parts of their operations, in the hope that they can eventually strike a balance between their bloated cost structures and a dismal market for new car sales.”

G.M. announced they would “cut 47,000 more of its 244,000 workers worldwide” and shut down ”five more plants in North America, leaving it with 33.” They also plan to cut their “lineup of brands in half, to just four: Chevrolet, Cadillac, GMC and Buick.” Pontiac will also “have a much smaller role, if any, in G.M.’s future.” And G.M. said they would phase out the “Saturn brand, which it once hoped would build small cars to counter the best of the Japanese brands.”

What a mess. None of us want to see anymore people added to the unemployment rolls, but these companies don’t seem to get that Americans “need cars that go farther on a gallon of gasoline, pollute less and save money at the pump.”

The bailout requests are now like some sort of endless money pit in the abyss.

Read full story · Comments { 30 }

Into the Frying Pan

Following fast on the heels of President Obama signing the stimulus bill on Tuesday came the news that he “would send an additional 17,000 American troops to Afghanistan this spring and summer, putting his stamp firmly on a war that he has long complained is going in the wrong direction.”

The new order from the Obama administration increses the troop level in Afghanistan by nearly 50% and White House officials said, “[a] further decision on sending more troops will come after the administration completes a broader review of Afghanistan policy.”

Mr. Obama said in a written statement that the increase was “necessary to stabilize a deteriorating situation in Afghanistan, which has not received the strategic attention, direction and resources it urgently requires.”

At least for now, Mr. Obama’s decision gives American commanders in Afghanistan most but not all of the troops they had asked for. But the decision also carries political risk for a president who will be sending more troops to Afghanistan before he has begun to fulfill a promised rapid withdrawal of troops from Iraq.

Many experts worry that Afghanistan presents an even more formidable challenge for the United States than Iraq does, particularly with neighboring Pakistan providing sanctuary for insurgents of the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

The announcement, which was expected, drew heat from anti-war groups before it was even made. Knowing he was stepping into the frying pan, Obama also noted in his statement that “the fact that we are going to responsibly draw down our forces in Iraq allows us the flexibility to increase our presence in Afghanistan.”

AP News reported yesterday that the U.N. said in a new report that “the number of Afghan civilians killed in armed conflict surged to a record 2,118 people last year as the Afghan war turned increasingly bloody.” 

This is now Obama’s war on terror, compliments of BushCo. The question for many of us to President Obama is simply, “when will it end?” There really is no doubt things have heated up there and it’s the war we should have been fighting, but “when will it end?” And how many more American lives will be lost?

Read full story · Comments { 10 }

You Know Those People You Pass on the Road Changing a Tire on their Trailer?

http://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn105/TaylorMarsh/tire.jpg Sometimes a rainbow is just a rainbow.

Case in point, we were driving along after coming through a particularly nasty bit of highway when we looked up to see a gorgeous full rainbow complete with a shadow of a second one. A couple of minutes later my husband uttered an expletive, just moments after I sensed what had just happened. A blow out on one of our brand new trailer tires (though the picture is not our actual tire, by the way).  Needless to say our rainbow euphoria evaporated on the spot.

Of all the road trips I’ve taken, as well as those my husband and I have now taken together, those poor souls you see on the side of the road changing a trailer tire with their stuff unloaded nearby was now very close to my every thought, as we were now one of them. That I never imagined that would be me some day is not a minor point.

Stuff happens on the road.

No sooner had we changed the tire than we hit a torrential downpour. … .. It soon turned into serious snowfall (that lasted into the night), so we cut our driving short and hunkered down in a hotel room smaller than a New York City studio apartment bathroom. We were too tired to care. Well, that’s not entirely true, especially once the train started going by hourly. A fitting end to a day from hell. Thank the gods for alcohol.

Blue skies and freezing temps greeted us the next day, but that was nothing compared to the mountain passes, which were icy and dangerous. I slid through half of the drive, as my husband followed in his truck.  The sunrise morning was a nerve racking focus driven experience through beautiful elk country at freezing temperatures, with nearly unpassable roadways. Even my windshield wipers and fluid were frozen until almost midday. But the glorious beauty of the drive made any tension disappear.

Once the day unfolded we had clear sailing, with a long way still to go.

Meanwhile, back in the world of politics a lot was happening.

All the while I listened to the soundtrack of “The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly,” a fitting backdrop to red clay bluffs flying past.

Lordy how I love driving through the American west. (I’ve done it enough times.)

President Obama’s first decision about Afghanistan seemed miles away.

President Obama said Tuesday that he would send an additional 17,000 American troops to Afghanistan this spring and summer, putting his stamp firmly on a war that he has long complained is going in the wrong direction.

The order will add nearly 50 percent to the 36,000 American troops already there.

I support a limited addition of troops wholeheartedly, as I’ve stated many times before. VoteVets issued a statement on it, welcoming the move as well. Sen. Feingold expressed the need for more than just troops on Afghanistan, because a strategy is needed beyond the military, something on which most can agree, though you wouldn’t know it by the rhetoric of some.

I’ll check in from the road again before I finally make it to Washington if I possibly can. Let’s hope it’s clear sailing from here.

Read full story · Comments { 6 }

Late Night Wind Down

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL3mvkZ6mVk

Sit back, take a load off and listen to Johnny A‘s stellar instrumental version of Witchita Lineman.

Change has come to Washington in many ways in recent weeks, including this latest bid by Obama to reverse more bad Bush environmental policy:

The Obama administration on Tuesday agreed to review whether it should regulate carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants, portending a major reversal of the Bush administration’s policy on global warming.

The Environmental Protection Agency granted a petition from environmental groups seeking to overturn a Bush-era EPA memo that prohibited controls of those emissions.

Read full story · Comments { 3 }

Stimulus Signed, Go Out and Spend?

stimulussigned President Obama has signed the Stimulus Bill and the hope is that putting the plan into action will jumpstart the economy and bring some relief to recession weary Americans.

Word has it that President Obama has also readied “a new $50 billion foreclosure rescue for legions of Americans who are in danger of losing their homes.”

White House press secretary, Robert Gibbs, said today that President Obama has also “not ruled out a second stimulus package. Let’s hope we don’t need to go down that road, but frankly, as a small business owner, I want to see the economy back on track.

While speaking to reporters on Air Force One, en route to Denver, Mr. Gibbs said, “I think the president is going to do what’s necessary to grow this economy.” While “there are no particular plans at this point for a second stimulus package,” he added, “I wouldn’t foreclose it.”

Obama will visit Phoenix on Wednesday, where he will “unveil his new housing plan.” 

Americans United Coalition released an ad today to remind everyone that economic recovery act is one of the many steps the government needs to take to straighten out the economy:  

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nX4RLuS46Fw

Well… I think consumers need to get their confidence back. We’ll see what the stimulus brings before we all run out and spend, eh?

Read full story · Comments { 5 }

Is It Time for Burris to Go?

Is it time for Senator Roland Burris to go? Just when we thought the whole Burris/Blago spectacle might be over, there are new revelations and Burris is now coming clean, admitting that he did seek “to raise campaign funds for then-Gov. Rod Blagojevich at the request of the governor’s brother at the same time he was making a pitch to be appointed to the Senate seat previously held by President Barack Obama.”

Burris’ latest comments in Peoria Monday night were the first time he has publicly said he was actively trying to raise money for Blagojevich. Previously Burris has left the impression that he always balked at the issue of raising money for the governor because of his interest in the Senate appointment.

In comments to reporters after appearing at a Democratic dinner, the senator several times contradicted his latest under-oath affidavit that he quietly filed with the Illinois House impeachment panel earlier this month. That affidavit was itself an attempt to clean up his live, sworn testimony to the panel Jan. 8, when he omitted his contacts with several Blagojevich insiders.

You can read Burris’ give-and-take with reporters here.

It really doesn’t look good that Burris keeps changing his story. Maybe it’s just me, but I think that the time has come for Burris to consider resigning. The distraction and the drama has gone on too long.

Read full story · Comments { 34 }

Dick’s Last Ditch

In the final days of the Bush presidency, Dick Cheney apparently lost his Svengali hold over Bush. The Daily News reports that Cheney ”launched a last-ditch campaign to persuade his boss to pardon Lewis (Scooter) Libby – and was furious when President George W. Bush wouldn’t budge.”  

In multiple conversations, both in person and over the telephone, Cheney tried to get Bush to change his mind. Libby was convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice in the federal probe of who leaked covert CIA operative Valerie Plame’s identity to the press.

Several sources confirmed Cheney refused to take no for an answer. “He went to the mat and came back and back and back at Bush,” a Cheney defender said. “He was still trying the day before Obama was sworn in.”

After repeatedly telling Cheney his mind was made up, Bush became so exasperated with Cheney’s persistence he told aides he didn’t want to discuss the matter any further.

Word has it that Cheney thinks Libby got a “raw deal.” But some Bush loyalist seem to think Cheney’s push for Bush to pardon Libby was “excessive” and even “over the top.” It must have a blow to old Dick’s overblown ego leaving him feeling rather impotent

This morning, during an interview on NBC’s Today Show, Karl Rove claimed the Daily News story was ‘overblown‘. And speaking of Rove, what’s up with this: Obama seeks delay in deciding on Rove subpoena. It’s a no question issue in my opinion. Rove must testify.

Read full story · Comments { 9 }

Tuesday Morning Blues and News

California for all intents and purposes is in the toilet economically speaking. Things have gone from bad to worse out there, as Governor Schwarzenegger is now preparing to send out 20,000 pink slips. That will leave many more Californians singing the blues.

If there’s any bright news at all coming from the state that’s been hit so hard from the recession, it’s the fact that Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa unveiled a new plan on Monday that is being billed as the “largest effort by a U.S. city to reduce pollution by retrofitting incandescent street lights with more efficient LEDs or light emitting diodes.”

Over a five-year period starting in July, the city will retrofit 140,000 of its residential street lights with  LEDs, officials said during City Hall news conference. The project is expected to reduce carbon emissions by 40,500 tons and save $10 million annually.

Bill Clinton was on hand for the announcement of the new project. Clinton said:

“This is the best place in the world — in the U.S. at least — to lead this. This is like taking 6,000 cars off the road. If every major city followed your lead, we could eliminate 2 1/2 coal-fired power plants.”

Last night AP News reported that “close to 3,000 American soldiers who recently arrived in Afghanistan to secure two violent provinces near Kabul have begun operations in the field and already are seeing combat.” AP is also speculating that President Obama will soon make a decision about “sending additional troops to Afghanistan.”

The NY Times editorial board said today it’s time to make the U.S. food supply a priority. We’ve had far too many episodes of “dangerous food,” of late.

President Obama will sign the stimulus bill today in Denver. It’s reported to be just the “beginning” of his economic plan:

Obama will hear from automakers Tuesday on how they’ll restructure to get more taxpayer bailout money. Then he’ll sign a $787 billion stimulus bill in Denver and fly to Phoenix , where on Wednesday he’ll unveil how his administration will spend at least $50 billion of Wall Street rescue money to begin halting mortgage foreclosures nationwide.

And sometime during the hectic week, the Treasury Department is expected to provide more details on a $100 billion -plus plan for the federal government and private investors to team up to rid bank balance sheets of toxic assets. Those are the distressed mortgage securities and other complex financial instruments that investors are shunning, and that are crippling bank balance sheets and restraining lending.

On their own, each of these developments would be dramatic by historical standards. But for any of them to succeed, they’ll need to work in unison with the others. 

Finally, the new Governor of Illinois is purging Blago’s people, while Blago picked Senator Burris, is making his own headlines once again. That’s what I love about politics, the drama.

Read full story · Comments { 5 }

Late Night: Tulsa Time and More…

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6TwHjUXRuA

I have no idea what route Taylor is taking on her cross country journey, but if she’s driving via the southern route she’ll be hitting Tulsa Time after some good hard driving.

Throughout my cross country drive, we found that the GPS we were using was lousy at finding gas stations, but great at directing us to Starbucks, which became few and far between in the heartland. An editorial in the Philly Inquirer yesterday suggested that Starbucks was good model to “forecast the U.S. economy.”

In the middle of 2006, Starbucks’ stock price peaked at $39.63 a share. Everywhere you looked, a new Starbucks was opening, an average of six new stores a day. The company had 12,241 shops in the United States, with plans to expand to 40,000 locations worldwide. Citing increased demand from less-affluent customers, chief executive officer Howard Schultz told investors: “We don’t believe that we are even 50 percent through to the unique opportunity we have.”

Things have changed.

At the end of January, Starbucks Corp. announced its second round of store closings, bringing the number of U.S. stores it will shutter to 800. The company’s revenue has shrunk. Its net income for 2008 declined 54 percent. Its first-quarter profit from 2009 is down 69 percent. Today, Starbucks’ stock price hovers around $9.50.

From Wall Street to Main Street, the days of sipping latte’s are long gone for many, and only time will tell if the stimulus plan will provide the boost everyone is hoping for.

Read full story · Comments { 4 }

Quick Takes from the News

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYrZZ68zhSs

It is a bit of a slow news day today being President’s Day, which I had totally forgot about until I tried to go to the bank this morning. C-Span did a survey ranking the Presidents for the occassion. Lincoln was named as the top President and Buchanan as the worst. George W. Bush, came pretty close to Buchanan ranking 36th out of the 42.

It will be interesting to see a few years down the road where President Obama ranks in a similar survey. The WaPo reported a few days ago that Obama had scored an early victory of “historic proportions” when it came to the stimulus package. And, that said Obama still has a “sky-high” approval rating in the polls despite the obstructionist Republicans and their chatter.

If you haven’t read “Former Gitmo Guard Tells All,” in Harper’s, it is an absolute must read. There’s some doubt being raised about how far Obama will allow Bush probes to go. Screw the “moving forward” restraint routine. Americans have a right to the truth about Bush’s secrets.

Secretary Clinton took questions from the press while en route to Japan, the transcript is here. And you can check in at DipNote to read HRC’s first blog post on her trip.

Read full story · Comments { 24 }

Bill Clinton: Obama Handled Controversial Stimulus Well

Former President Bill Clinton was on The Today Show this morning. He gave team Obama some kudo’s on handling the economic stimulus bill, telling NBC’s Ann Curry that he thought President Barack Obama is “off to a good start.”

Clinton, who left his successor with a federal budget surplus, offers George W. Bush’s successor high marks for winning a $787-billion economic stimulus one month in office – a spending plan that pushes an already swollen Bush-era federal deficit well past $1 trillion.

The former president, in an interview aired this morning on NBC’s Today show, says the new president and his economic team have handled a controversial stimulus well – “given the fact that they had to do it in a hurry.”

Clinton, was optimistic on the current economic crisis, saying that the “nation will get through” it and suggesting that the stimulus package will be “our bridge over troubled waters.”

Ann Curry asked Bill Clinton if he thought “‘the greatest threat to U.S. security now is the global economic crisis – as the Obama administration’s director of national intelligence has reported.”

“In the short tern,” yes, Clinton says, yet terrorism remains a longer-term threat. In the face of the short-term threat, he says, Obama has gotten a good start. He also has offered Obama some private advice, but declines to discuss it in this interview. [...]

“Given the fact that they had to do it in a hurry and he had to deal with Congress and the inevitable compromises, I think he got quite a good bill out of this,” Clinton says. [...]

Of course, the political battle over the stimulus package is not over. In fact it is probably just beginning. The sides have been drawn and Republicans will continue to press that they think the package will be a failure.

Bill Clinton did not hestitate to remind viewers on The Today Show that perhaps ”the economy would not be in the shape it is in today, if his economic team still had been in place.” He’ll get no argument from me on that one. Times were good, economically speaking, in my opinion when Bill Clinton was President.

All eyes are now on Obama’s team to see what will happen with this package, which he will sign tomorrow. I am determined to remain optimistic, because watching the economy sink lower daily is just too damn depressing.

UPDATE: More good stuff from Bill Clinton… Clinton was in Austin, TX, over the weekend hosting the Clinton Global Initiative University. CNN’s John Roberts interviewed him. The text of the interview is here.

Read full story · Comments { 15 }

Monday Morning Java Jolt: Clinton Heads to Asia

japan_clinton_asia_xkan104UPDATE: Clinton arrives in Japan.

Wake up and smell the coffee readers. Taylor is hitting the road for her cross country journey this morning and my goal is to keep you all informed while she’s on the road. Having just made a cross country road trip and move myself just about 4 months ago, I hope Taylor’s is as much fun and trouble-free as mine was.

As Taylor mentioned here yesterday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is in Asia this week and her trip should give us plenty to talk about. Clinton is traveling to Asia where she will “seek to develop a strong coordinated response to the global financial crisis between the U.S. and Asia’s economic powers during her four-nation regional tour.”

Mrs. Clinton cited, in particular, China’s “robust stimulus plan” as the type of action the Obama administration is hoping to see from Asian nations in an effort to reenergize the global financial system.

“I will be discussing with [Asian countries] the approaches that they’ll be taking” to stimulate their economies “and seeking greater cooperation,” Mrs. Clinton told reporters aboard en route to Alaska from Washington. “The Chinese have a very robust stimulus plan…They are taking internal steps.”

Mrs. Clinton arrives in Tokyo Monday evening and will then travel to Indonesia, South Korea and China.

Clinton will be meeting with “religious readers, university students, and business leaders across the region” and she has “described her trip as primarily a listening tour to learn more about how Washington can develop partnerships to combat key economic, security or environmental issues.” Clinton said that “the information she gathers will feed into the Obama administration’s review of its Asia policy.”

“We have a very broad agenda to deal with when it comes to China,” Mrs. Clinton said. “This first trip will be intended to find a path forward.”

Mrs. Clinton said she’s raise human rights issues in China when she takes part in a town hall meeting in Beijing.

The timing of Clinton’s trip is impeccable given the news that Japan’s economy is tanking again, at the “fatest pace” since the 1970′s:

The sharp downturn is exposing the vulnerability of Japan’s export-driven economic recovery. The dismal figures also place Japan firmly among the worst-hit in the global crisis, dwarfing economic declines in the United States and Europe.

And speaking of the timing of Clinton’s trip to Asia, as Clinton was in flight to Tokyo, there was news that “North Korea was threatening to fire a missile.”

“The North Koreans have already agreed to dismantling,” she said. “We expect them to fulfill the obligations that they entered into.”

The secretary has warned North Korea “to avoid any provocative action and unhelpful rhetoric.”

Clinton said her trip will demonstrate a new U.S. commitment to work with Asian leaders on “problems that no one nation, including ours, can deal with alone.”

Clinton also promised to meet with families of Japanese citizens kidnapped by North Korea in the 1970s and ’80s.

She said, “We do want to press the North Koreans to be more forthcoming with information.”

Needless to say there should be plenty to talk about as we start of the week with a jolt of java and what appears to be the beginning of an interesting week for Secretary Clinton in Asia.

Read full story · Comments { 5 }

Into the Night and on to Dawn’s Early Light

Road music. There’s so much, starting with jazz first, Miles Davis, but on long road trips you simply have to have great rock. But then it always comes back to jazz, especially the instrumentals.

Secretary Clinton is in Asia, so there should be some great stuff coming from State while I’m on the road. You can follow what’s going on, as well as see terrific videos. Don’t hesitate to put Hillary items “In the News” for all to see. It’s her first big trip overseas.

The week begins knowing that President Obama prevailed to get his stimulus passed, which he will sign into law this week. It was ugly, but no president has gotten this type of major legislation passed so quickly. Of course, there’s two sides to that coin. For the sake of the country and the watching world, let’s hope it works.

Read full story · Comments { 5 }

Cheap Tricks

Photobucket

Today I’m doing the last of my packing for our cross-country road trip, which begins at dawn tomorrow. Pamela will be back to take care of you.

I don’t know if you saw SNL’s opener last night arguing who’s smarter Sean or Rush but it was hilarious. When it comes to Republicans there is no doubt they are the center of the Republican universe. The reason why is easy: conservative terrestrial radio reaches across this country into every town, county and state. No other medium can compete with giving one single message to the masses. That’s it’s the cheapest way to deliver it and is completely portable helps immensely in tough economic times.

So with all the talk about the Fairness Doctrine, people are really digging in to the subject, which can only benefit us all. After all, whether you are for it or against it, there is nothing to lose from Democrats exposing the conservative ownership on radio stations that program the whole day of non stop right-wing talk. Just imagine listening to station managers explain why their entire radio line up goes from Rush to Sean to Mark Levin or Fred Thompson, including Christian broadcasting, while progressive hosts explain they can’t get their phone calls returned. Not even from producers who tilt left because it’s just too hard to get a new host launched and sustain them monetarily on terrestrial radio. So progressives are stuck on the Internet or on satellite, which doesn’t come close to the financial or audience opportunities.

There are many also arguing the legal side, saying there are ways to break through so the Fairness Doctrine will never fly legally. That Obama isn’t interested makes it even harder, some say. Frankly, President Obama is a smart man, but he likely doesn’t have a clue about what goes on in terrestrial radio, and there’s no reason he should. Most people don’t have the facts on how it’s set up and operated. The myth that liberals can’t monetize is nonsense as well.

Even if you aren’t convinced that the FD is the way to go, which I’m not, a debate on terrestrial radio’s make up on ownership is long overdue.

Knowing the minutia of radio, I’ve written and spoken a lot about it, while also reading a lot of bloviating about the FD, most of it rubbish. So I was thrilled to see a cogent argument on the subject, which is an important read for anyone not quite versed on the subject. David Neiwert:

The core problem is ownership: Radio station ownership in the past twenty years has been decidedly conservative. And anyone who’s worked in media can tell you that ownership sets the tone and direction of what you do. After the Fairness Doctrine was removed, these wealthy right-wing owners effectively proved right one of the fears that drove the creation of the Fairness Doctrine in the first place: That the wealthy can and will dominate the political conversation on the public airwaves by simply buying up all the available space. Since the wealthy in this country are overwhelmingly conservative, the end result was not only predictable, it was in fact predicted.

Liberal radio has withered on the vine not for the lack of demand, but for the lack of ownership dedicated to nurturing talent, promoting the product, and creating local outlets as well as national markets.

Besides, anything that makes Sean Hannity red in the face is good for Democrats.

There are so many reasons why the debate about the FD and radio ownership could benefit Democrats. Reading progressive arguments against the FD is infuriating, because these folks are basically caving to pressure from the wingnuts who don’t want any sunshine on this issue due to the fact that if people knew how stacked the radio deck was in favor of conservatives they’d finally be exposed and someone would have to do something about it.

In these tough economic times, with ad dollars drying up, conservative hosts are the ones raking in most of the money, while spreading one side of the story across this country. No other platform can compete. That’s the way conservatives like it and some Dems seem happy to oblige.

As an aside, since I’ve gotten quite a few emails about it, my show remains on hiatus and I’m not sure where I go from where I’ve been. I haven’t been on the air since 2002, only able to do web radio, which isn’t the primary place where I want to be broadcasting. The passion I have for the medium remains, but I never got into it to do it for free.

Now it’s your turn. Consider this a Sunday free for all, any topic.

Keep good thoughts for us on our long drive back east. I’m just hoping the weather doesn’t get too gnarly. Pamela will take good care of you.

Read full story · Comments { 18 }

Chuck Todd, Lowly Reporter

Chuck Todd needs to get a serious grip on himself. After foolishly posting about not having the access he wants at the White House, Todd gets creamed by readers who evidently know his job better than he does. In response Todd writes that it’s not about him or NBC not having access, but about, oh seriously, you figure it out:

Obviously, I’m one of the newbies here in the White House press corps, so maybe I’m unfamiliar with the ways of how this place works. I have to say, nothing is more frustrating than covering an actual event here at the White House if you at all believe in anything remotely having to do with the First Amendment.

[...] *** UPDATE, RESPONSE TO COMMENTORS: “This isn’t about us not having access, this is about ANYONE having access… if it’s NOT us, it’s the public!…Beat us up all you want, but this isn’t about us whining, it’s about us not even being able to do the job you want us to do and that is be the people’s questioner here. But, of course, having a respectable debate on this issue with some is impossible. The irony, of course, is that many of you would be just as upset about the lack of access as I am if the occupant of the White House were someone else.

Stunning. Note to Mr. Todd: Being a talking TV head is different from a reporter on a beat. I know this is a news flash for you, but maybe you should have asked one of your colleagues who has experience with the job you now have before writing an embarrassingly revealing bruised ego confession on NBC’s First Read.

Read full story · Comments { 25 }

Bipartisan Lessons

pzep's pig

Let’s hope they’re learned, because the success or failure of the stimulus could determine the effectiveness of Obama’s first term.

The Wall Street Journal has an interesting piece up about what they’re calling Rahm Emanuel’s “wide ranging interview with reporters.”

[...] Mr. Emanuel owned up to one mistake: message. What he called the outside game slipped away from the White House last week, when the president and others stressed bipartisanship rather than job creation as they moved toward passing the measure. …

No doubt about it. While Republicans grabbed on to “spending bill,” which stuck, the talking point from the White House was that President Obama and the Democrats’ first priority was getting Republican votes for the stimulus.

With Judd Gregg pulling his name from commerce, maybe they can now sober up to the fact that bipartisanship is good in theory, but if you don’t manifest the principles on which you stand it’s not worth the effort. That’s especially true when only one side is interested, with the other side simply part of a charade.

But then again, considering Obama’s platform of bringing people together, you have to wonder if that’s not his first priority, beyond anything having to do with promoting a progressive agenda, which has never been an Obama strong suit.

This leads me to John J. Judis’ article in TNR today.

Say what you will about Speaker Pelosi, she pushed hard for many things only to get rewarded by attacks on all levels, including Senator Reid who had the audacity to announce a “deal” without Pelosi even being present. Mind you, as everywhere online “deal” was screamed, many didn’t even notice Pelosi’s absence (though we certainly did). As majority leader, it was Reid who led the charge to support the stimulus, which was packed with tax cuts, as well as cut in size, so Obama could have a quick win. Reid accomplished this by getting 3 Republicans on board, which was touted with much fanfare and praise, while also making sure to reward conservative Democrats at the cost of smart economic policy. Glenn Greenwald also picks up on the Judis piece.

For my money, I believe many on the left are still trying to come to grips with Obama the politician in action as opposed to the idealized candidate of the election season. There is nothing in Obama’s history that reveals a hard core Democratic partisan core, someone who is willing to go to that mat on ideological principle. Couple that with a harsh reality, which is that electing a Democratic president is hardly the end of the work.

This early in on Obama’s presidency, the big left activist groups have been caught in the trap of trying to let Obama get started, the 100 day honeymoon phase if you will, even as we’re in the midst of historic challenges that require enormous policy enactment to reverse what was inherited from Bush-Cheney. It’s historically difficult, even seen as unseemly, to come after a president in the first 100 days, especially when he’s of your own party. But given the massive legislation being enacted within the first 30 days, Judis encouraging Democratic activists to push for what is required for progressive policy movement is like yelling fire after the building is engulfed. But considering you’re standing in a brand new building that just opened its doors, the last thing you were expecting is to be surrounded by flames so quickly.

Paul Krugman seems to be one of the only ones who got out alive.

Given how fast Obama and congressional Democrats felt they had to move, the reality we’re now stuck with is choking. The stimulus, as well as Geithner’s, er, plan, is done, so urging an end to the honeymoon reveals that the biggest initiative of Obama’s first term belongs to him, Harry Reid and the Congress, because the big lefty groups didn’t suit up fast enough to get in the game.

Meanwhile, the Republicans finally found their line in the sand, which the Obama administration helped them find in the middle of a political desert.

Art by Paul Szep for TM.com.

Read full story · Comments { 143 }

Feinstein Steps In It

I’m knee deep in packing, so forgive the intermittent posting right now, as I prepare for another cross-country trip from west to east. Meanwhile… back in the land of international relations…

Honestly, I really don’t know where to start with this one.

Over the last few years Pakistan has been very vocal in pushing back on any U.S. action inside FATA or outlying areas, which includes our Predator drone strikes. But not everything is always as it seems, especially inside countries where the people have shown direct opposition to anything U.S. So why during the Senate Intelligence Committee’s hearings for U.S. Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair did Senator Feinstein feel compelled to spell out the Pakistani’s knowledge and help with U.S. strikes inside that country?

At a hearing, Feinstein expressed surprise at Pakistani opposition to the ongoing campaign of Predator-launched CIA missile strikes against Al Qaeda targets along Pakistan’s northwest border.

“As I understand it, these are flown out of a Pakistani base,” she said of the planes.

Blair’s response was classic: Blair did not respond directly to Feinstein’s remark, except to say that Pakistan is “sorting out” its cooperation with the United States.

See Spencer Ackerman.

Since Feinstein is chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, you’d think she’d get how to speak about such things, without letting her ego run amok and reveal something that puts the Pakistani government behind the target zone.

Experts said the disclosure could create political problems for the fledgling government in Islamabad.

“If accurate, what this says is that Pakistani involvement, or at least acquiescence, has been much more extensive than has previously been known,” said Bruce Hoffman, a terrorism expert at Georgetown University. “It puts the Pakistani government in a far more difficult position [in terms of] its credibility with its own people. Unfortunately it also has the potential to threaten Pakistani-American relations.”

Now, in response, Feinstein’s office is being defensive, saying she was simply citing what has already been reported in the Washington Post. Considering Ms. Feinstein led the initial charge against Leon Panetta for CIA, you’ve got to wonder, well, loose lips sink international relationships and the cooperation we need to be effective on counterinsurgency. Feinstein knows better.

Read full story · Comments { 14 }

Pelosi Marsh Mouse Story ‘Total Fabrication’

marsh mouse

GOP staffers have too much time on their hands. They’ve pulled $30 million out of the stimulus to aim at Speaker Pelosi. I guess if you have no chance of dimming the new president’s popularity you might as well go after the Speaker of the House. No doubt setting up 2010 early. It all started when the Washington Times wrote it up: Pelosi’s mouse slated for $30M slice of cheese.

Greg Sargent:

But I just contacted the House GOP staffer who wrote the initial email laying out this talking point, and he conceded that the claim by conservative media that the mouse money is currently in the bill is a misstatement. “There is not specific language in the legislation for this project,” he said.

The staffer held to the claim that the mouse money would ultimately be spent, however, arguing that the bill’s passage would ensure that money would ultimately go to the unnamed agency. “If the bill passes, the project will be funded according to what the relevant agency told our staff,” he said. “The bottom line is, if this bill becomes law, taxpayers will spend 30 million on the mouse.”

Not quite, according to Pelosi’s office:

“There are no federal wetland restoration projects in line to get funded in San Francisco,” Pelosi spkesperson Drew Hammill said. “Neither the Speaker nor her staff have had any involvement in this initiative. The idea that $30 million will be spent to save mice is a total fabrication.”

Someone needs to tell the crew at “Morning Joe,” especially Joe, who was all over it yesterday. As for Mike Barnicle, as much as he bitches about the blogs maybe he should read them instead of the Washington Times, which has now updated their original article that helped spread the story in the first place.

Sean Hannity hit it on his radio show as well. But for Mr. Hannity the facts never matter.

This is how they do it. Create urban myths to attack Democrats, but since Obama is currently Mr. Popularity they simply had to find another target. Congress is always good for a whack, with Republicans putting Speaker Pelosi in the bull’s eye. Do a Google search on the subject and you’ll see how fast it spread.

Read full story · Comments { 20 }

Bill Clinton: More Balance Needed on Radio

Oh, this is going to ignite the wingnuts.

Via Mario Solis-Marich, with the audio available at Huffington Post:

“We either ought to have the Fairness Doctrine or more balance on the other side. Because, essentially, there’s always been a lot of big money to support the right-wing talk shows. … [...] and if you only hear one side on the radio, that’s pretty tough. ” – Former President Bill Clinton

Amidst the economic downturn, terrestrial radio remains the strongest weapon Republicans have against the Democrats, including on the stimulus. It’s simply reality.

Whether the Fairness Doctrine is the ultimate answer, I don’t know, but clearly media consolidation is an issue, especially with the imbalance of conservatives v. progressives on the radio.

Which brings me to Sean Hannity’s show, which compared to El Rush is a perfect example of pitiful programming. Hannity has turned his show into a non-stop commercial for himself, Fox, and his advertisers, in between calls where the same thing is said every day. As Bill Clinton says in the audio, even when you disagree with Limbaugh he can sometimes be entertaining, oftentimes inadvertently. Most of conservative talk has lost that vein, with Hannity leading the pack in the yawn factor. Hey, but he has a lib on every once in a while, which is more than you can say for Rush, who is the king of reclusive radio, where he just sits in his studio and talks to himself all day.

Nobody knows what conservative radio can do to a presidency more than William Jefferson Clinton. They led the charge against him in the 1990′s. With Democrats in power the least they should do is look at media ownership.

Read full story · Comments { 54 }