<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Gates on Defense Cuts</title> <atom:link href="http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/04/gates-on-defense-cuts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/04/gates-on-defense-cuts/</link> <description>Taylor Marsh - News, Political Analysis, Foreign Policy, and  Independent Political Opinion on Progressive Politics</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:12:32 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Cujo359</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/04/gates-on-defense-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-434574</link> <dc:creator>Cujo359</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:16:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=31220#comment-434574</guid> <description>Taylor Marsh says:
06 April 2009 at 4:28 pmLooks kinda like they don&#039;t know why it was taken down. My guess is that someone somewhere demanded a review after the first WaPo article on the FM.I downloaded the FM, and, being impatient, skipped right to the back to find out how it ends. Appendix C is an interesting distillations of lessons, many of which I suspect Vietnam vets will find familiar. For me the classic line was:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
23. &lt;B&gt;Practice armed civil affairs.&lt;/B&gt; Counterinsurgency is armed social work, an attempt to redress basic social and political problems while being shot at. This makes civil affairs a central counterinsurgency activity, not an afterthought.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
If only Donald Rumsfeld had been able to read this manual ...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taylor Marsh says:<br
/> 06 April 2009 at 4:28 pm</p><p>Looks kinda like they don&#8217;t know why it was taken down. My guess is that someone somewhere demanded a review after the first WaPo article on the FM.</p><p>I downloaded the FM, and, being impatient, skipped right to the back to find out how it ends. Appendix C is an interesting distillations of lessons, many of which I suspect Vietnam vets will find familiar. For me the classic line was:</p><blockquote><p> 23. <b>Practice armed civil affairs.</b> Counterinsurgency is armed social work, an attempt to redress basic social and political problems while being shot at. This makes civil affairs a central counterinsurgency activity, not an afterthought.</p></blockquote><p>If only Donald Rumsfeld had been able to read this manual &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taylor Marsh</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/04/gates-on-defense-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-434572</link> <dc:creator>Taylor Marsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:03:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=31220#comment-434572</guid> <description>new thread...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new thread&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: maxadog</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/04/gates-on-defense-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-434571</link> <dc:creator>maxadog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:44:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=31220#comment-434571</guid> <description>P.S.  The Ed Show tonight at 9pm / 6pm depending on your coast.  Yes, I know, there are states in the middle.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.  The Ed Show tonight at 9pm / 6pm depending on your coast.  Yes, I know, there are states in the middle.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: maxadog</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/04/gates-on-defense-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-434570</link> <dc:creator>maxadog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:42:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=31220#comment-434570</guid> <description>OTMy mother, who lives in a swing state and voted for Obama, just asked me how she can switch her party affiliation from republican to democrat.My brother and I are both dems, but she&#039;s been on the darkside for as long as I can remember.She recently retired and got cable and only watches MSNBC.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT</p><p>My mother, who lives in a swing state and voted for Obama, just asked me how she can switch her party affiliation from republican to democrat.</p><p>My brother and I are both dems, but she&#8217;s been on the darkside for as long as I can remember.</p><p>She recently retired and got cable and only watches MSNBC.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Audiegrl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/04/gates-on-defense-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-434569</link> <dc:creator>Audiegrl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:36:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=31220#comment-434569</guid> <description>OTHardball is going to cover the rightwing and the rise in gun violence, in a few minutes</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT</p><p>Hardball is going to cover the rightwing and the rise in gun violence, in a few minutes</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pmichael</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/04/gates-on-defense-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-434568</link> <dc:creator>pmichael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:34:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=31220#comment-434568</guid> <description>Joe Biden on with John and Joe Morgan at the Yankee game. I love it. Biden must have used the word &quot;Hell&quot; a dozen times - talking about his young baseball years. *L*</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Biden on with John and Joe Morgan at the Yankee game. I love it. Biden must have used the word &#8220;Hell&#8221; a dozen times &#8211; talking about his young baseball years. *L*</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: justlen</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/04/gates-on-defense-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-434567</link> <dc:creator>justlen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:07:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=31220#comment-434567</guid> <description>Interesting, I thought the LCS were SWATH ships, but they are actually trimarans.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, I thought the LCS were SWATH ships, but they are actually trimarans.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Topics about Economy &#187; Archive &#187; Gates on Defense Cuts</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/04/gates-on-defense-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-434565</link> <dc:creator>Topics about Economy &#187; Archive &#187; Gates on Defense Cuts</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:36:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=31220#comment-434565</guid> <description>[...] Taylor Marsh placed an observative post today on Gates on Defense CutsHere&#8217;s a quick excerptCongressional members will weigh in on cuts, because of the jobs side of what Gates is proposing, to name one issue. As everyone knows there’s a lot of politics in defense spending. Winslow Wheeler weighs in , as do others over at the National Journal : …Of course, if even a few of the Gates “cuts” are serious, a pork-crazed Congress will go nuts. The big challenge will then become making any serious decisions stick. To do so, President Obama will have to back Gates to the hilt, and bot [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Taylor Marsh placed an observative post today on Gates on Defense CutsHere&#8217;s a quick excerptCongressional members will weigh in on cuts, because of the jobs side of what Gates is proposing, to name one issue. As everyone knows there’s a lot of politics in defense spending. Winslow Wheeler weighs in , as do others over at the National Journal : …Of course, if even a few of the Gates “cuts” are serious, a pork-crazed Congress will go nuts. The big challenge will then become making any serious decisions stick. To do so, President Obama will have to back Gates to the hilt, and bot [...]</p><p
class="uexc_utils-links"> <a
href='http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/04/gates-on-defense-cuts/comment-page-1/?uexc_edit=434565#comment-434565' class='uexc-edit-link'>Edit</a></p>]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GeoT</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/04/gates-on-defense-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-434563</link> <dc:creator>GeoT</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:29:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=31220#comment-434563</guid> <description>Cujo359 says:
06 April 2009 at 4:24 pmIn case anyone else was wondering what a Joint High Speed Vessel might be, it’s a big honkin’ catamaran
_____I&#039;ll take a two seater with a stick shift.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cujo359 says:<br
/> 06 April 2009 at 4:24 pm</p><p>In case anyone else was wondering what a Joint High Speed Vessel might be, it’s a big honkin’ catamaran<br
/> _____</p><p>I&#8217;ll take a two seater with a stick shift.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taylor Marsh</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/04/gates-on-defense-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-434562</link> <dc:creator>Taylor Marsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:28:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=31220#comment-434562</guid> <description>Hey Cujo359. &quot;A big honkin’ catamaran&quot; is the official term, by the way.On another note, if you want some light reading, &quot;“Tactics in Counterinsurgency” is back online. It&#039;s a &quot;big honkin&#039;&quot; file, but here it is:http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fmi3-24-2.pdfSecrecy News has the story on why it was taken down in the first place.http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/04/tactics_coin.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Cujo359. &#8220;A big honkin’ catamaran&#8221; is the official term, by the way.</p><p>On another note, if you want some light reading, &#8220;“Tactics in Counterinsurgency” is back online. It&#8217;s a &#8220;big honkin&#8217;&#8221; file, but here it is:</p><p><a
href="http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fmi3-24-2.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fmi3-24-2.pdf</a></p><p>Secrecy News has the story on why it was taken down in the first place.</p><p><a
href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/04/tactics_coin.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/04/tactics_coin.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cujo359</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/04/gates-on-defense-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-434561</link> <dc:creator>Cujo359</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:24:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=31220#comment-434561</guid> <description>I doubt Obama will push, which is too bad. There needs to be change in how the DoD does business. There is only so much money, and they get far too much of it right now.In case anyone else was wondering what a Joint High Speed Vessel might be, it&#039;s &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/hsv-gallery.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a big honkin&#039; catamaran&lt;/A&gt; that&#039;s supposed to be able to offload quickly in ports of underdeveloped countries. If we&#039;re going to continue the kinds of campaigns we&#039;ve been involved in lately, there&#039;s a definite need for such vessels.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt Obama will push, which is too bad. There needs to be change in how the DoD does business. There is only so much money, and they get far too much of it right now.</p><p>In case anyone else was wondering what a Joint High Speed Vessel might be, it&#8217;s <a
HREF="http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/hsv-gallery.htm" rel="nofollow">a big honkin&#8217; catamaran</a> that&#8217;s supposed to be able to offload quickly in ports of underdeveloped countries. If we&#8217;re going to continue the kinds of campaigns we&#8217;ve been involved in lately, there&#8217;s a definite need for such vessels.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taylor Marsh</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/04/gates-on-defense-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-434560</link> <dc:creator>Taylor Marsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:24:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=31220#comment-434560</guid> <description>Yes. ;-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. <img
src='http://taylormarsh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GeoT</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/04/gates-on-defense-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-434558</link> <dc:creator>GeoT</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:57:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=31220#comment-434558</guid> <description>someone explain to me why having something in the base budget versus in the supplementary appropriations matters. In this context I&#039;m assuming it means stability, predictability, continuity etc, as opposed to having to beg for money every so often. Did I answer my own question?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>someone explain to me why having something in the base budget versus in the supplementary appropriations matters. In this context I&#8217;m assuming it means stability, predictability, continuity etc, as opposed to having to beg for money every so often. Did I answer my own question?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AnninCA</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/04/gates-on-defense-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-434547</link> <dc:creator>AnninCA</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:26:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=31220#comment-434547</guid> <description>Interesting, so you don&#039;t think Obama will push.Too bad, his recommendations sound sensible to me.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, so you don&#8217;t think Obama will push.</p><p>Too bad, his recommendations sound sensible to me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/33 queries in 0.016 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 795/841 objects using memcached

Served from: taylormarsh.com @ 2012-02-10 12:16:48 -->
