TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Archive | April, 2009

Spring in Washington

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

The second picture above is part of the F.D.R. memorial along the tidal basin in D.C. It’s spectacular, with fountains and chiseled F.D.R. quotes, plus statues of both the president and Eleanor.

It really was a splendid walk, seeing these gorgeous trees that date back to 1912; 3,000 cherry trees from Mayor Yukio Ozaki of Tokyo. The photos above were taken on April 1, which was the peak blooming moment in this year’s Cherry Blossom season.

What’s catching your eye this Saturday? Any interesting news happening in the global village?

Read full story · Comments are closed

World News, Cocktail Edition

Well, east coasters, if it’s Friday night, it’s Tip O’Neill time; an evening for politics, socializing, drinking, but also anything else that’s on your mind. West coasters will have to catch up on the cocktails a bit later. With an in case you missed it ’round the world brief on the side.

Iran and Venezuela’s new joint bank, from the Islamic Republic News Agency.

Way off our map here, Malawian judge rejects Madonna.

Keira Knightley beaten up by boyfriend in domestic violence ad.

Haredi Jews, the most conservative of the Ultra-Orthodox, continue to ignore women as powerful contributors. They photoshopped out women of the Israeli cabinet.

Turkish film fest is a happening scene.

Watching Saudi Arabia, Minister Prince Nayef has been appointed second deputy prime minister, which is seen as one step closer to becoming the crown prince.

Travel Cuba! In support of the Free to Travel Cuba Act. Aka Sen. Menendez’s very bad week.

Tremendous podcast on COIN (counterinsurgency doctrine), via Abu Muqawama.

Salut! … to the tune of Cannonball Adderley. The rest is up to you.

 
Read full story · Comments are closed

Budget Reviews: Obama Wins

Photobucket

I know I’ve said it before, but what a week for the American President.

… as well as Democrats, because as you’ll see below, there was nary a Republican to be found.

We’re also learning about Obama’s crisp reminder to bank executives, which came via anonymous sources, but provides a delicious quote of the day. Obama to bank execs:

“My administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks.” – President Obama (via Politico)

Classic.

The Wall Street Journal takes aim at Al Gore on “cap and collapse,” as they see it. I know, you’re shocked.

Washington Post says not so fast, but no one should expect cap and trade to come easily. No doubt Al Gore knows this all too well.

Love or hate the budget, it was a winner for Obama and his administration. But they sure do own it now. What do you think?

New York Times: A lesson that bipartisanship can’t happen with Republicans. Budget “Viewed As A Victory For The New White House, Particularly Because Most Moderate And Conservative Democrats Went Along.”

Wall Street Journal: “President’s Priorities on Health Care, Energy and Education Are Intact.” … “A Significant Victory.”

Christian Science Monitor: “Obama gets budget passed. Fast? Yes. Bipartisan? Nope”

New York Daily News: A “Political Victory” For The President.

Bloomberg: “Got A Pair Of Wins On Capitol Hill As The House And Senate Approved Drafts Of His 2010 Budget Plan That Largely Adhere To The Administrations Priorities.”

New York Times: The House Budget Voted “…actually reflected a strong show of Democratic support for the budget, since it often barely passes. It was the first time in a dozen years that a budget had received more than 230 votes.”

Politico: “House vote surpassed the size of budget victories for either party over the last decade.”

New York Times: “House Democrats easily defeated Republican alternatives and won backing for their budget from all segments of their party, from conservative Blue Dogs to urban liberals.”

Democrats are definitely flexing their muscles. The New York governor even succeeded in kicking Rush out of New York. It’s an excuse to sit on his posterior in Florida, sulking, no doubt, after Ed Schultz got the MSNBC gig.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Hail To The Chief

Photobucket

In one visit, President Obama turned the page from the Bush-Cheney era of cowboy leadership to one that acknowledges that in the 21st century we cannot go it alone.

Merkel of Germany and Sarcozy of France went from promising disgruntlement to giving credit where it’s earned:

Both credited the new U.S. president with helping to break a banking-secrecy logjam over tax havens and the release of a blacklist of non-compliant jurisdictions.

… “President Obama really found the consensus,” Sarkozy told reporters after the meeting. “He didn’t focus exclusively on stimulus … In fact it was he who managed to help me persuade [Chinese] President Hu Jintao to agree to the reference to the … publication of a list of tax havens, and I wish to thank him for that.”

In her news conference, Merkel noted that “the American president also put his hand into this.”

Pres. Sarkozy announced he will also take one detainee from Gitmo.

As for Russia’s Pres. Medvedev, what a difference a real leader makes:

The Russian president contrasted Obama as “totally different” to his predecessor George W. Bush, whom he blamed for the “mistake” of US missile shield plans fiercely opposed by Moscow.

[...] “I liked the talks. It is easy to talk to him. He can listen. The start of this relationship is good,” he said, adding: “Today it’s a totally different situation (compared to Bush)… This suits me quite well.”

It’s a turn in a new direction, though manifesting something concrete, especially on loose nukes, remains to be worked out, as does the missile defense issue, which waits a solution.

Obama went further today, reaching out in an historic townhall that was obviously meant to encourage the people of France and also Germany that their countries need to get further involved in Afghanistan. This as Pres. Obama heads to NATO to press his case for more regional involvement in Afghanistan, while also stressing that Al Qaeda and terrorism remains a world threat.

“France recognises that having al-Qaeda operate safe havens that can be used to launch attacks is a threat not just to the United States but to Europe.

“In fact it is probably more likely that al-Qaeda would be able to launch a serious terrorist attack in Europe than in the United States because of proximity.

“This is not an American mission, this is a Nato mission, this is an international mission.”[..]

It’s enough to make Glenn Beck cry.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Unanimous Iowa Supreme Court Decision on Gay Marriage

Consider this the believe it or not edition of civil rights. Iowa’s Supreme Court says same-sex marriage ban is unconstitutional.

BREAKING NEWS… The Iowa Supreme Court says the state’s same-sex marriage ban violates the constitutional rights of gay and lesbian couples, making it the third state where gay marriage is legal.

In a unanimous ruling issued Friday, the court upheld a 2007 Polk County District Court judge’s ruling that the law violated the state constitution.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Obama Unites France and China

Photobucket

At the end of this day, President Barack Obama will have some serious points on the board. The House passed his budget, give or take a billion or two, with the Senate likely to pass it later tonight. On top of that was a G-20 summit that was not so notable for the $1 trillion pledged and what the leaders accomplished, but for a private moment that is now getting a lot of attention.

Jake Tapper has the story.

President Obama played mediator at a moment where Sarkozy of France and Jintao of China were heading the G-20 into turbulence. Obama stepped in.

According to sources inside the room, President Obama just played peacemaker in a spat between French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Hu Jintao, President of the People’s Republic of China.

In the finaly plenary session among the G-20 leaders, Sarkozy and Hu were having a heated disagreement about tax havens. [...]

The back and forth orchestrated by Obama after a spat between two leaders over tax shelters first began with Sarkozy, with a note being passed to China’s Jintao, who Obama then talked to privately as well, with the help of translators. But the end result says a lot about our President, who was able to keep a rift from souring, even derailing the unity of a meeting that only has one day to get anything done.

It reminds me of what Obama said he was about back in May 2006, something I refer to often, which is especially appropriate today.

“I think that I have the capacity to get people to recognize themselves in each other. I think that I have the ability to make people get beyond some of the divisions that plague our society and to focus on common sense and reason and that’s been in short supply over the last several years. I’m not an ideologue, never have been. Even during my younger days when I was tempted by, you know, sort of more radical or left wing politics, there was a part of me that always was a little bit conservative in that sense; that believes that you make progress by sitting down listening to people, recognizing everybody’s concerns, seeing other people’s points of views and then making decisions.”- Barack Obama (on ABC’s “This Week”)

Read Tapper’s account and what went down. You won’t hear Germany or France grumbling, as was first expected. Something happened at the G-20 for Mr. Obama, who already has the attention of the citizenry, but now has a new relationship with world leaders.

“Well, if it’s just Roosevelt and Churchill sitting in a room with a brandy, you know, that’s an easier negotiation. But that’s not the world we live in. And it shouldn’t be the world that we live in.” – President Barack Obama

It’s been a very good day for the American President.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Conservative Women for America’s Day of Misinformation

Photobucket

Every time I think I can’t be more appalled by what’s going on at Concerned Women for America, I’m always delivered into an alternative universe that raises my blood pressure. Good thing I’m a work out rat, because otherwise I’d blow a fuse.

It’s called “Day of Truth,” but it’s anything but:

…Sharing the message that there is an alternative to the born-gay rhetoric in a redemptive and hope-filled manner is also important in reaching gay-identified peers. There may be some who have accepted their homosexuality simply because they have heard no alternative. Your message of hope may have a significant impact on those individuals. Being compassionate and concerned for the well-being of those dealing with homosexuality may even open the door for those who have never shared their struggle with anyone. And most importantly, trust the Holy Spirit and follow His leading! It is the greatest value when you allow God to work through you and your own insecurities when reaching gay-identified students.

God can save you from the gay, compliments of the Conservative Women of America. Ho-boy. They just don’t get it. If they didn’t choose their heterosexuality, why do they think gays and lesbians choose to be gay?

Read full story · Comments are closed

The Cool Customer at Defense

Photobucket

Robert Gates has been around a very long time. He made his bones during William Casey’s days in Afghanistan, when the C.I.A. director was running his own little covert war. In 1985, under Casey, Afghans “began cross-border operations into the Soviet Union itself,” according to Steve Coll’s Ghost Wars (pg. 104). Being Casey’s executive assistant was quite a training ground. So it’s not at all surprising to read Defense Secretary Gates’ reaction to new P.M. Benjamin Netanyahu’s bluster reported in the Atlantic.

Mr Gates said he does not expect Israel – which believes the US estimate for when Iran could develop a nuclear weapon is too sanguine – to take military action this year.

“I guess I would say I would be surprised…if they did act this year,” said Mr Gates.

As he was sworn in as the new Israeli prime minister this week, Benjamin Netanyahu warned that the greatest danger to Israel was Iran’s attempt to develop nuclear weapons. But asked whether Iran would cross a nuclear “red line” this year, Mr Gates said: “I don’t know, I would guess probably not”.

“I think we have more time than that. How much more time I don’t know,” said Mr Gates. “It is a year, two years, three years. It is somewhere in that window.” [...]

Taking the long view, but also strategically analyzing the repercussions of military actions by Netanyahu, Gates obviously judges that Israel will be sure to act when the world won’t deliver blowback, which will require Obama and his team getting a chance to work their diplomatic plan before Israel takes extreme measures. There’s a ways to go before that trigger is pulled.

I’d point to a bigger reality worth watching in Netanyahu’s government, which is Avigdor Lieberman. Amjad Atallah writes in Foreign Policy about “Israel’s Awful New Government,” which brings this aspect into view. But just as Amjad asks if Obama has the courage to stand up to U.S. interests, The Jewish Week offers a warning, though a bit inflammatory, of what Obama will face in dealing with Iran, where Israel is concerned.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, sworn in on Tuesday as head of a cobbled-together coalition that has produced jitters in Washington, is an old hand at using Capitol Hill as a counterweight to Democratic presidents eager for peace process progress. But Netanyahu will find a changed environment when he makes his inaugural trip to Washington in May.

Groups on the Jewish and Christian right say they’re ready to run interference for him in Congress, especially if the Barack Obama administration decides to move aggressively on Palestinian statehood, or even presses on sensitive issues such as Israeli settlements. [...]

But Gates, knowing what’s ahead at NATO, used the FT interview to reiterate the point that Europe needs to step up where Afghanistan is concerned, something he’s been saying for years.

In a high-profile speech in Munich in February last year, Mr Gates lamented that “many Europeans question the relevance of our actions” in Afghanistan. He said he wanted to “speak directly to the people of Europe” about the threat posed by Islamic extremism. A year later, Mr Gates conceded that his efforts had not borne much fruit.

”I have not seen the kind of effort that I would have hoped for in terms of European governments trying to persuade their people that attacks such as those that took place in Madrid and London…emanated from the Afghan-Pakistani border area,” said Mr Gates.

“This problem out there is as big a threat to the Europeans as it is to us…The British do a good job of making that case to their people, but on the continent I have not seen that kind of effort.”

Coming at the same time 10,000 more combat troops have been requested.

… The U.S. military has 38,000 troops in Afghanistan, and the number is projected to rise to 68,000 with deployments scheduled for this year. Those deployments include a 4,000-strong contingent of trainers from the 4th brigade of the 82nd Airborne Division, 17,000 other combat troops, a 2,800-strong combat aviation brigade and thousands of support forces whose placement was not publicly announced, the Pentagon said.
ad_icon

If approved, the additional 10,000 troops — including a combat brigade of about 4,000 troops and a division headquarters of about 2,000 — would bring the total approved for next year to 78,000, officials say. …

It’s clear from the crescendo of events that Obama’s 100 days will wind down just as the summer winds of conflict pick up.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Michelle Obama Touches the Queen!

Photobucket

Midday break brought to you by Time: “The rules are set in stone.” … (“Whatever you do, don’t touch the Queen!”) But not to worry, opines Time, “there is room for theological argument as to whether the American reciprocity of touch was allowable given the social dynamics of the situation.” According to them, everyone is a twitter over it. Segue to Eric Boehlert.

But the Daily Mail has the full story. When in England, let the Brits tell it.

‘As she did, she put her arm around Mrs Obama and rested her gloved hand on the small of her back.’

Almost simultaneously, Mrs Obama put her arm around the Queen’s shoulders rather more firmly.

‘The pair then looked at their feet and appeared to be discussing their shoes.

‘The Queen then dropped her arm and, a few seconds later, Michelle did the same. The entire exchange lasted around eight to ten seconds but was absolutely extraordinary.’

No-one – including the ladies-in-waiting standing nearby – could believe their eyes. In 57 years, the Queen has never been seen to make that kind of gesture and it is certainly against all protocol to touch her.

‘But she didn’t seem to mind a bit and was smiling and joking throughout,’ the eyewitness said.

At least neither of the Obamas winked, as George W. Bush reportedly did.

As for Mrs. Obama, see Gallup. She’s soaring.

Read full story · Comments are closed

From ‘Family Photo’ to NATO Summit

Photobucket

Name those leaders, and the missing one who was reportedly in the loo.

But underneath the pictures lurks international push back that puts Pres. Obama’s steel to the test.

… French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel answered just hours later with a combative appearance of their own, demanding fast and strict international regulation of the world financial system; Mr. Sarkozy called it “nonnegotiable.”

They warned against an empty conclusion of the conference despite many disputes over its direction. Chief among them are French and German calls for fast and far-reaching financial regulation, while the U.S. has stressed stimulus plans and argued for a lighter regulatory approach to some parts of the financial world, particularly hedge funds.

“We do not want results that have no impact in practice,” said Ms. Merkel. “Germany and France will speak with one and the same voice,” Mr. Sarkozy added, citing an on-and-off political alliance that has previously pitted the two countries against the U.S. or the U.K. over Europe’s direction. “As the chancellor rightly said, we demand results,” he said. “Regulation is not simply a word, an empty word… It is a major objective.” [...]

Martin Wolf, who I heard speak last week on “What will replace the American consumer?”, talks to Steve Clemons about the G-20. Any time Wolf is talking it’s worth listening. (Laura Tyson was present and the female financial voice at the symposium.)

But whatever you want to say about the photo ops, the Obamas meeting the Queen, as well as France and German’s “nonnegotiable” bluster, there will be nothing lasting out of the G-20. Yes, they will all commit to just say no to protectionism. However, the world is contracting into nationalistic self-interest for the short-term.

That said, President Obama’s produced quite a star turn, with NBC’s “First Read” calling it a “diplomatic decathlon.” A joint statement and commitment with Russia on nukes; handshakes and more with China; while Israel’s new prime minister rants.

Obama now looks on to NATO, which is where intentions meet manifestations. With the new ask for 10,000 more troops, Obama needs more help in Afghanistan than ever. Big week for the American boss, with what follows the G-20 mattering a whole lot more.

Read full story · Comments are closed

President Karzai ‘Legalizes’ Rape

Originally published on Huffington Post

Photobucket

Since my post was published at Huffington Post on Monday, there’s been even more outrage about President Karzai’s caving to the fundamentalists. Out of Canada:

Defence Minister Peter MacKay said he will use this week’s NATO summit to put “direct” pressure on his Afghan counterparts to abandon the legislation.

“That’s unacceptable – period,” he said Wednesday. “We’re fighting for values that include equality and women’s rights. This sort of legislation won’t fly.”

After what happened in the Swat region, this was easily foreseen, especially with President Karzai’s popularity plummeting and an election on the horizon. The Independent‘s recent article also throws a shadow, maybe even complications, across Obama’s Afghanistan strategy. From the article:

… Critics claim the president helped rush the bill through parliament in a bid to appease Islamic fundamentalists ahead of elections in August.

In a massive blow for women’s rights, the new Shia Family Law negates the need for sexual consent between married couples, tacitly approves child marriage and restricts a woman’s right to leave the home, according to UN papers seen by The Independent.

“It is one of the worst bills passed by the parliament this century,” fumed Shinkai Karokhail, a woman MP who campaigned against the legislation. “It is totally against women’s rights. This law makes women more vulnerable.” [...]

That extremism is hitting the Af-Pak region just as President Obama unveils his new strategy, with Secretary Clinton in the Hague making our case, should be a chilling signal to us all.

When Sharia law was agreed to in Swat, Ahmed Rashid, a leading voice in all things Taliban, wrote what it meant to the unraveling in Pakistan, which we saw take yet another lurch recently.

While the government insists the legal change will allow only a limited application of Islamic justice through the local courts, the Taliban interprets it as allowing the full application of Sharia, affecting all aspects of education, administration and law and order in the region.

However the deal may be interpreted, it is an unmistakable defeat in the country’s losing battle against Islamic extremism. Even though the military regime of former President Pervez Musharraf entered into several controversial, short-lived cease-fires with the Pakistani Taliban in the Pashtun tribal belt, Musharraf’s army never conceded major changes in the legal or political system.

We’ll have to see if any reporter on the trip with Clinton asks her about this latest development aimed at women, compliments of Pres. Karzai. Mrs. Clinton has shown her commitment to women’s rights as human rights as first lady, so it’s a perfect question to ask. As an independent journalist, unfortunately, right now I don’t have a seat at that table, because I don’t have a new media (or traditional) sponsor. But if I did it would be the first question I’d ask.

In all the arguments against Obama’s Afghan strategy, many coming from the left, what the President’s commitment means to Afghan women is rarely in the mix. That symbol, if supported, is something that would ricochet around the world.

How can any country be stable without women as part of the political mix? The answer is simple and sobering. It can’t.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Trucker TV

Photobucket

…and I mean that in a positive sense. If you saw my husband’s truck you’d get it (most of you have heard me talk about it).

After Phil Griffin did his best to throw a curve ball, stating MSNBC might do reruns, “The Ed Show” is in. This is the gig Schultz has wanted for a long time.

Good for him… and us. Another lib on the TV machine, as Ms. Maddow calls it.

Rush Limbaugh couldn’t cut it in this most personal of mediums. Ed’s new gig is likely to drive Rush mad, maybe even inspire him to Jenny Craig.

One of the things Mr. Schultz said tonight on “Countdown” was that labor has gotten the shaft and he wants to talk about it. Now that’s must see TV.

Shuster will co-host, which is a better fit, with Tamron Hall. Norah O’Donnell moves to the morning.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Petraeus Takes Netanyahu Seriously

In a hearing today in front of the Armed Services Committee, US military’s Central Command David Petraeus stated he believes Mr. Netanyahu is serious about Iranian threats against Israel and is prepared to act.

… “the Israeli government may ultimately see itself so threatened by the prospect of an Iranian nuclear weapon that it would take preemptive military action to derail or delay it.”

That Iranian nationalism I talked about yesterday reared its head in Iran’s statement, which was expected.

To digress a moment, one thing that got my attention was Levin’s assessment that Obama tying Afghanistan and Pakistan together might not be the right strategy. From Bloomberg:

Still, Levin questioned whether the administration was correct to suggest that success in Afghanistan is linked so closely to success in Pakistan.

Levin said he remained “skeptical” whether Pakistan “has either the will or the capability to secure their border.”

“We should not tie Afghanistan’s future totally to the success of efforts in Pakistan or to Pakistan’s governmental decisions,” he said.

I’m not sure where Levin is getting his background material or his analysis, one would think good sources, but I haven’t heard this from any expert lately, not one. You sure won’t hear it coming out of State, least of all Holbrooke.

Now back to Israel and Iran, with Joe Klein’s assessment a classic: “Netanyahu unhinged.” Considering the topic of conversation in the comment section on my post on Netanyahu, I thought some of you would appreciate Klein’s closer:

The single fact on the ground that makes an Iranian bomb extremely likely, if not inevitable, is the existence of Israel’s bomb. As long as the Israeli Prime Minister goes around threatening to attack Iran, the Mullahs are going to want some way to counter that.

With Adm. Blair stating that Israel and the U.S. have seen the same data, but come to different conclusions; and Petraeus stating in front of Levin’s committee that Netanyahu’s saber rattling is real, the gaping void is what President Obama is prepared to do in the midst of the ratcheting up on Netanyahu’s rhetoric towards Obama.

The President called Netanyahu to congratulate him, and this is the read out provided from the White House:

The President spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu today. The President congratulated the Prime Minister after his swearing-in yesterday, and reaffirmed the United States’ steadfast commitment to Israel and its security. The President said he looked forward to working closely with Prime Minister Netanyahu and his government to address issues of mutual concern, including Iran and Arab-Israeli peace.

In the face of what sounds like a Netanyahu ultimatum, what exactly does he expect Obama to do about Iran?

Read full story · Comments are closed

Obama on the World Stage

Photobucket

Tea with the Queen of England, getting ready for tomorrow’s one-day G-20 meeting, amidst protesters, and meetings with President Putin, and dialogue with China on economic development. A lot going on in the world, as President Obama has the most important trip of his presidency so far.

I’ll be out this afternoon, so consider this an April Fool free for all. Speaking of April Fool’s day, could the Republicans have chosen a more appropriate day to announce their tax cuts for the rich budget? Joke’s on them.

And guess what? Newt Gingrich is in again. Grand Old Party of the Past with another yesteryear message. Seems Newt is doing a preemptive political strike against Mrs. Palin. It’s priceless, because if you have to say she’s not the leader, maybe you’re actually worried she is. From The Hill:

“I think that she is going to be a significant player,” said Gingrich during an interview on CBS’s “Face the Nation”. “But she’s going to be one of 20 or 30 significant players. She’s not going to be the de facto leader.”

Let the infighting continue.

Read full story · Comments are closed

No One’s Looking Into Anyone’s Soul

Praise the gods, Bush’s idiocy nowhere to be found.

“A good place to start will be the issue of nuclear proliferation…” – President Obama

Obama and Putin released a joint statement:

Joint Statement by President Dmitriy Medvedev of the Russian Federation and President Barack Obama of the United States of America

Reaffirming that the era when our countries viewed each other as enemies is long over, and recognizing our many common interests, we today established a substantive agenda for Russia and the United States to be developed over the coming months and years. We are resolved to work together to strengthen strategic stability, international security, and jointly meet contemporary global challenges, while also addressing disagreements openly and honestly in a spirit of mutual respect and acknowledgement of each other’s perspective.

We discussed measures to overcome the effects of the global economic crisis, strengthen the international monetary and financial system, restore economic growth, and advance regulatory efforts to ensure that such a crisis does not happen again.

We also discussed nuclear arms control and reduction. As leaders of the two largest nuclear weapons states, we agreed to work together to fulfill our obligations under Article VI of the Treaty on Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) and demonstrate leadership in reducing the number of nuclear weapons in the world. We committed our two countries to achieving a nuclear free world, while recognizing that this long-term goal will require a new emphasis on arms control and conflict resolution measures, and their full implementation by all concerned nations. We agreed to pursue new and verifiable reductions in our strategic offensive arsenals in a step-by-step process, beginning by replacing the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty with a new, legally-binding treaty. We are instructing our negotiators to start talks immediately on this new treaty and to report on results achieved in working out the new agreement by July.

While acknowledging that differences remain over the purposes of deployment of missile defense assets in Europe, we discussed new possibilities for mutual international cooperation in the field of missile defense, taking into account joint assessments of missile challenges and threats, aimed at enhancing the security of our countries, and that of our allies and partners.

The relationship between offensive and defensive arms will be discussed by the two governments.

We intend to carry out joint efforts to strengthen the international regime for nonproliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery. In this regard we strongly support the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), and are committed to its further strengthening. Together, we seek to secure nuclear weapons and materials, while promoting the safe use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. We support the activities of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and stress the importance of the IAEA Safeguards system. We seek universal adherence to IAEA comprehensive safeguards, as provided for in Article III of the NPT, and to the Additional Protocol and urge the ratification and implementation of these agreements. We will deepen cooperation to combat nuclear terrorism. We will seek to further promote the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism, which now unites 75 countries. We also support international negotiations for a verifiable treaty to end the production of fissile materials for nuclear weapons. As a key measure of nuclear nonproliferation and disarmament, we underscored the importance of the entering into force the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. In this respect, President Obama confirmed his commitment to work for American ratification of this Treaty. We applaud the achievements made through the Nuclear Security Initiative launched in Bratislava in 2005, including to minimize the civilian use of Highly Enriched Uranium, and we seek to continue bilateral collaboration to improve and sustain nuclear security. We agreed to examine possible new initiatives to promote international cooperation in the peaceful use of nuclear energy while strengthening the nuclear non-proliferation regime. We welcome the work of the IAEA on multilateral approaches to the nuclear fuel cycle and encourage efforts to develop mutually beneficial approaches with states considering nuclear energy or considering expansion of existing nuclear energy programs in conformity with their rights and obligations under the NPT. To facilitate cooperation in the safe use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, both sides will work to bring into force the bilateral Agreement for Cooperation in the Field of Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy. To strengthen non-proliferation efforts, we also declare our intent to give new impetus to implementation of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1540 on preventing non-state actors from obtaining WMD-related materials and technologies.

We agreed to work on a bilateral basis and at international forums to resolve regional conflicts.

We agreed that al-Qaida and other terrorist and insurgent groups operating in Afghanistan and Pakistan pose a common threat to many nations, including the United States and Russia. We agreed to work toward and support a coordinated international response with the UN playing a key role. We also agreed that a similar coordinated and international approach should be applied to counter the flow of narcotics from Afghanistan, as well as illegal supplies of precursors to this country. Both sides agreed to work out new ways of cooperation to facilitate international efforts of stabilization, reconstruction and development in Afghanistan, including in the regional context.

We support the continuation of the Six-Party Talks at an early date and agreed to continue to pursue the verifiable denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula in accordance with purposes and principles of the September 19, 2005 Joint Statement and subsequent consensus documents. We also expressed concern that a North Korean ballistic missile launch would be damaging to peace and stability in the region and agreed to urge the DPRK to exercise restraint and observe relevant UN Security Council resolutions.

While we recognize that under the NPT Iran has the right to a civilian nuclear program, Iran needs to restore confidence in its exclusively peaceful nature. We underline that Iran, as any other Non-Nuclear Weapons State – Party to the NPT, has assumed the obligation under Article II of that Treaty in relation to its non-nuclear weapon status. We call on Iran to fully implement the relevant U.N. Security Council and the IAEA Board of Governors resolutions including provision of required cooperation with the IAEA. We reiterated their commitment to pursue a comprehensive diplomatic solution, including direct diplomacy and through P5+1 negotiations, and urged Iran to seize this opportunity to address the international community’s concerns.

We also started a dialogue on security and stability in Europe. Although we disagree about the causes and sequence of the military actions of last August, we agreed that we must continue efforts toward a peaceful and lasting solution to the unstable situation today. Bearing in mind that significant differences remain between us, we nonetheless stress the importance of last year’s six-point accord of August 12, the September 8 agreement, and other relevant agreements, and pursuing effective cooperation in the Geneva discussions to bring stability to the region.

We agreed that the resumption of activities of the NATO-Russia Council is a positive step. We welcomed the participation of an American delegation at the special Conference on Afghanistan convened under the auspices of Shanghai Cooperation Organization last month.

We discussed our interest in exploring a comprehensive dialogue on strengthening Euro-Atlantic and European security, including existing commitments and President Medvedev’s June 2008 proposals on these issues. The OSCE is one of the key multilateral venues for this dialogue, as is the NATO-Russia Council.

We also agreed that our future meetings must include discussions of transnational threats such as terrorism, organized crime, corruption and narcotics, with the aim of enhancing our cooperation in countering these threats and strengthening international efforts in these fields, including through joint actions and initiatives.

We will strive to give rise to a new dynamic in our economic links including the launch of an intergovernmental commission on trade and economic cooperation and the intensification of our business dialogue. Especially during these difficult economic times, our business leaders must pursue all opportunities for generating economic activity. We both pledged to instruct our governments to make efforts to finalize as soon as possible Russia’s accession into the World Trade Organization and continue working towards the creation of favorable conditions for the development of Russia-U.S. economic ties.

We also pledge to promote cooperation in implementing Global Energy Security Principles, adopted at the G-8 summit in Saint Petersburg in 2006, including improving energy efficiency and the development of clean energy technologies.

Today we have outlined a comprehensive and ambitious work plan for our two governments. We both affirmed a mutual desire to organize contacts between our two governments in a more structured and regular way. Greater institutionalized interactions between our ministries and departments make success more likely in meeting the ambitious goals that we have established today.

At the same time, we also discussed the desire for greater cooperation not only between our governments, but also between our societies ?? more scientific cooperation, more students studying in each other’s country, more cultural exchanges, and more cooperation between our nongovernmental organizations. In our relations with each other, we also seek to be guided by the rule of law, respect for fundamental freedoms and human rights, and tolerance for different views.

We, the leaders of Russia and the United States, are ready to move beyond Cold War mentalities and chart a fresh start in relations between our two countries. In just a few months we have worked hard to establish a new tone in our relations. Now it is time to get down to business and translate our warm words into actual achievements of benefit to Russia, the United States, and all those around the world interested in peace and prosperity.

Joint Statement by Dmitriy A. Medvedev, President of the Russian Federation, and Barack Obama, President of the United States of America, Regarding Negotiations on Further Reductions in Strategic Offensive Arms

The President of the United States of America, Barack Obama, and the President of the Russian Federation, Dmitriy A. Medvedev, noted that the Treaty on the Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms (START Treaty), which expires in December 2009, has completely fulfilled its intended purpose and that the maximum levels for strategic offensive arms recorded in the Treaty were reached long ago. They have therefore decided to move further along the path of reducing and limiting strategic offensive arms in accordance with U.S. and Russian obligations under Article VI of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

The Presidents decided to begin bilateral intergovernmental negotiations to work out a new, comprehensive, legally binding agreement on reducing and limiting strategic offensive arms to replace the START Treaty. The United States and the Russian Federation intend to conclude this agreement before the Treaty expires in December. In this connection, they instructed their delegations at the negotiations to proceed on basis of the following:

- The subject of the new agreement will be the reduction and limitation of strategic offensive arms;

- In the future agreement the Parties will seek to record levels of reductions in strategic offensive arms that will be lower than those in the 2002 Moscow Treaty on Strategic Offensive Reductions, which is currently in effect;

- The new agreement will mutually enhance the security of the Parties and predictability and stability in strategic offensive forces, and will include effective verification measures drawn from the experience of the Parties in implementing the START Treaty.

They directed their negotiators to report on progress achieved in working out the new agreement by July 2009.

Mark the date.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Norm Coleman is a Sore Loser

It’s something everyone has to learn eventually: how to lose gracefully. Even after yet another setback, which gives Al Franken a serious boost, Norm Coleman still can’t get a grip.

No one likes losing.

Everyone wants do-overs.

But in the end when it’s over and you’re down, but your opponent is up, you slay your ego to admit that the other guy won.

Eric Boehlert, whose headline I borrowed for my own, has a great rundown on it.

Where is the outrage in Minnesota? Remember what Republicans did in Florida during the 200 election? It’s time the Democrats provided their version for Al. The other Al.

Read full story · Comments are closed