TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Archive | August, 2009

Squeeze Play

–bumped–

Downsizing expectations, William Jefferson Clinton offered the pitch.

Ken Conrad announces he won’t vote for a public option.

Huffington Post details part of what went down.

In a speech rallying progressives to make one last major push to pass health care reform, former President Bill Clinton accused Republicans of propagating a campaign of disinformation reminiscent of the effort to bring down his own attempt at reform.

“Do you want to go through that again?” the 42nd President asked the crowd of bloggers, online activists, and a slew of Democratic lawmakers at the Netroots Nation convention in Pittsburgh. “Of course you don’t. I’m telling you no matter how low they drive support for this with misinformation, the minute the president signs a health care reform bill his approval will go up. Secondly, within a year, when all those bad things they say will happen don’t happen, and all the good things happen, approval will explode.” …

In the midst of the mother of all health care squeeze plays, Obama’s approval isn’t exactly on anyone’s mind.


WJC on DADT

It’s Mike Madden who gets to the bottom line, including a moment, though he didn’t identify the person, that Lane Hudson interrupted Clinton on DADT (see Pam Spaulding), which is a bit backward looking considering where we’re standing. The rest of Madden’s Salon piece quite a bit more sober than most: As another Democrat’s healthcare reforms sputter, Bill Clinton talks incremental change to the Netroots Nation. Hey, who else has the power to make the plea?

Clinton also suggested that progressives had the opportunity to dominate American politics for the next 40 years. But for someone describing such a historic juncture, he seemed — cautious. “Trying to hold the president’s feet to the fire is fine, but first we have to win the big argument,” Clinton said about the healthcare fight, which many progressives now worry could be heading toward the same fate it met 15 years ago. “It’s ok with me if you want to keep everybody honest. But try to keep this thing in the lane of getting something done. We need to pass a bill.”

At about the same time Paul Begala was writing in the Washington Post, as if to also prepare people on the compromises to come from Clinton and Conrad. Quite the set up.

“We need to pass a bill,” said Clinton. Of course, he’s correct. But the Democratic desperation is depressing, especially considering the latest Conrad co-op news.

We’ve got a Democratic president who came into office with the wind at his back and the people (and the press) at his feet, and a majority in both houses of Congress, but this is what it’s come down to.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Sen. Jim Webb Wins Release in Myanmar

Webb also “secured” a rare visit with Suu Kyi, according to AP. The release of Yettaw, a man who doesn’t know Aung San Suu Kyi, is part of an overall diplomatic surge by the U.S. under Pres. Obama.

Tweeted this earlier.

U.S. Sen. Jim Webb won the release Saturday of an American prisoner convicted in Myanmar and sentenced to seven years in prison for swimming secretly to the residence of detained democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi, the senator’s office said.

Yettaw, 53, is to be officially deported Sunday, when he will fly with Webb on a military plane to Bangkok, according to a statement from Webb’s office.

Webb was for highest official to ever meet with junta leader Senior Gen. Than Shwe. That diplomacy thing:

While Washington has traditionally been Myanmar’s strongest critic, applying political and economic sanctions against the junta, President Barack Obama’s new ambassador for East Asia, Kurt Campbell, recently said the administration is interested in easing its policy of isolation. Webb has said that “affirmative engagement” could bring the most change to Myanmar, concerning those who think a hard line is the best approach.

Britain’s ambassador approved, some rights groups not so much.

Britain’s ambassador to the United Nations suggested Webb’s visit could help persuade the junta to free Suu Kyi.

“If the Americans can get the generals to see that their country’s interest is reflected in taking interest in reconciliation, releasing Aung San Suu Kyi and holding free and fair elections, that would be very helpful.” John Sawyers told BBC Radio 4 on Saturday.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Foreign Policy Notes

UPDATE (2:00 a.m.): Taliban claim in phone call to AP that Kabul car bomb contained 500kg of explosives, via Voice of America (VOA) South Asia Bureau Chief Steven L. Herman. At least 70 wounded after blast outside NATO HQ.


Afghanistan has quietly passed a law permitting Shia men to deny their wives food and sustenance if they refuse to obey their husbands’ sexual demands, despite international outrage over an earlier version of the legislation which President Hamid Karzai had promised to review. – Afghanistan passes ‘barbaric’ law diminishing women’s rights

Photobucket

She was the first female commander to head an American combat brigade in wartime. Brigadier General Heidi Brown now has the job of redeployment from Iraq.

Brown said her first task was to determine how much gear — including thousands of vehicles, weapons and housing units — needed to be shipped out and to understand how the Iraqi security forces could help with the move. Using her calculations, division and brigade commanders are being given targets and deadlines to identify equipment and personnel to send home.

“That’s a big task,” she said.

Nasrallah commemorates Lebanon war victory over Israel: Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah on Friday addressed a mass rally in Beirut to mark three years since the Shi’ite organization’s “victory” over Israel in the 2006 Second Lebanon War…

Clashes as radicals call for an “Islamic emirate in Gaza,” with at least 13 killed.

A radical Muslim sheikh called Friday for the creation of an Islamic emirate in Gaza, sparking clashes with Hamas forces that left 13 people dead, Hamas sources tell CNN.

Armed members of the radical Islamist group Jund Ansar Allah surround a group representative in Rafah on Friday.

The clashes ended after several hours, after Hamas forces blew up the home of Sheikh Abu al-Nour al-Maqdessi, leader of the Salafist jihadist group Jund Ansar Allah, or Soldiers of the Partisans of God, the sources said.

Al-Maqdessi escaped, they said, and Hamas security forces were searching for him.

Al Jazeera has more.

Dr. Susan Rice delivered an important speech this week. The text is worth a read.

As Sect. Clinton finishes up her grueling Africa trip, a report on the Bureau of African Affairs unloads. The assistant editor for Foreign Policy Elizabeth Dickinson has a piece up at The Cable on AF. It’s pretty dishy, as diplomatic things go.

Aljazeera English has a great video up on the Afghan election (seen here). There’s a debate on Sunday. Brian Katulis is on his way to Afghanistan for the election.

Rachel Maddow will be on “Meet the Press” this Sunday as part of the panel. I tweeted David Gregory saying I might actually watch. I’m so fed up with wingers and few women that if Maddow’s on it actually might be worth our time. Dick Armey will be on too. Off topic, but because of the health care flap he’s left his firm over the Freedom Works kerfuffle.

Read full story · Comments are closed

The Divider

Photobucket

She has no office.

She has no official power.

Yet what she wrote is the talk of politics, causing crowds to rise up and shout out loud, with everyone from cable hosts to pundits to the President of the United States answering her “death panels” charge.

She may be a quitter, but it’s good to be Sarah Palin.

That’s because while the politicians are running around trying to do their job and be heard above the town hall brawlers, she weighed in on the most important issue facing this country and changed the debate with a Facebook post. Proving that dumping the governorship wasn’t all madness. Her latest entry is a victory lap:

I join millions of Americans in expressing appreciation for the Senate Finance Committee’s decision to remove the provision in the pending health care bill that authorizes end-of-life consultations (Section 1233 of HR 3200). It’s gratifying that the voice of the people is getting through to Congress; however, that provision was not the only disturbing detail in this legislation; it was just one of the more obvious ones.

As I noted in my statement last week, nationalized health care inevitably leads to rationing. There is simply no way to cover everyone and hold down the costs at the same time. The rationing system proposed by one of President Obama’s key health care advisors is particularly disturbing. I’m speaking of the “Complete Lives System” advocated by Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, the brother of the president’s chief of staff. … ..

Making fun of Sarah Palin is political sport, but seriously, how’d the Democrats allow this to happen? Begin a debate about health care reform only to wind up with Sarah Palin, of all people, writing the script.

In purely political terms, the unleashing of “death panels” is the Republican shot that awoke the right. It also drove Pres. Obama to address it in his town hall, with Democrats repeating the phrase everywhere, laughing at it while trying to rebut it. It stuck anyway.

Keith Olbermann reduced Eugene Robinson to reading the full quote of his article last night on his show, because Palin had truncated it.

Tell me why everyone’s running around responding to Palin’s Facebook page? Because what she’s hoisting into the ether is so potentially damaging they have to. That’s how upside down everything is at this point.

In a Rovian turn of political cynicism, Palin blasted on Facebook one of the most divisively offensive statements that could be made in a health care debate, writing about “death panels” and implying that Trig, her son with Down Syndrome”, would have to stand before one. The gargantuan nerve it takes to launch a lie so ludicrously unbelievable reveals such heinous disregard for reality and facts you’ve got to wonder if she’s sane.

But then you watch the unraveling, the unleashing of the fury in the town halls we witnessed from Specter to McCaskill and beyond, wondering what spell was weaved over an already agitated American right wing who upon hearing “death panels” with “euthanasia” on top came completely unglued.

She took to Facebook a couple of days ago to push harder on “death panels”, taking her argument straight at Pres. Obama.

The New York Times is running a story about who started the rumor and the roots of it. No one should be surprised the same actors were around during the Clinton days, but the fact that American Spectator magazine and Betsy McCaughey, former New York Attorney General, an opponent of Hillarycare as well, is at the center hardly matters amidst the noise. McCaughey’s July article “Deadly Doctor”, on Rahm Emanuel’s father, cynically uses health care cost savings to scare the crap out of seniors. No one ever said Palin was in this alone.

The New York Times scolds critics of Dr. Emanuel saying…

But Dr. Emanuel’s paper does not quite say what Ms. Palin claims it does. Rather, it is an exploration of how scarce resources – like organs or vaccines during a pandemic – can be morally allocated when not enough resources are available.

Sober analysis that hardly comforts, which is why Palin’s pack sees a target.

The bit player in all this, Chuck Grassley, told an audience that he had to stay involved long enough so that the grass roots could organize, get on TV and make their stand. He said that if he hadn’t stayed in the debate in Washington there would have been a health care bill in June. Serving as a double agent while spinning bipartisan baloney, Obama buying in regardless, Grassley now says the end-of-life counseling is out in the Senate, as far as he’s concerned, which as is shown in Palin’s latest Facebook post, she takes as her win.

Howard Dean made a good case on “Countdown” that Grassley doesn’t decide and Republicans are digging themselves a hole, which others also believe. I’m not so sure.

A person everyone has judged isn’t national office material managed to cause a ruckus and change the dynamics of debate, getting Pres. Obama to respond to what she’d unleashed in writing that ricocheted across America. Palin forcing the President to answer her, because she’s backed by thousands and thousands of the furious loaded for bear with grievances.

All of this because of what was written by a woman who doesn’t hold office or any spot of power and doesn’t care about dividing America, because in the world from where she hails Sarah Palin already sees America divided. It’s also in her interest to keep it that way.

For that matter, the only hope Republicans have is division and defeating anything Obama that now is symbolized, at least for them, by “death panels,” which has less to do with health care and actual “death panels” than it does the intrusion of government in our lives, that old standard of the right rising from the ashes.

All this started by a woman who can’t be president. Of course, she doesn’t know she can’t be president. But for now it doesn’t really matter. She’s the star of her own “death panel” realty show. And it’s a huge hit.

Read full story · Comments are closed

A White House Email as PhRMA Deal Reported Confirmed

Steve Benen has already highlighted a portion of yesterday’s press briefing that also caught my attention, but which in the context of the White House viral email campaign, as the White House PhRMA deal breaks wide, is even more interesting to draw out.

JAKE TAPPER: A couple questions. I don’t know if you think it’s unfair to say, but it occurs to me that if the President finds himself at a town hall meeting telling the American people that he does not want to set up a panel to kill their grandparents, that perhaps there, at some point, the President has lost control of the message. And I’m wondering if you — if what you’ve seen in the last few weeks is one of the reasons why it was so important to the President earlier this year to pass health care reform in the House and Senate before the August recess. Is everything that’s going on right now what you feared would happen?

To answer Jakes question, it’s obvious that the Obama machine was blindsided by the virulent opposition to health care now assaulting lawmakers across the country, but also Obama’s poll numbers.

They’ve finally realized it, but now they’ve got double trouble.

Ryan Grim of the Huffington Post seemingly breaks the PhRMA story wide open today, complete with art.

It says the White House agreed to oppose any congressional efforts to use the government’s leverage to bargain for lower drug prices or import drugs from Canada — and also agreed not to pursue Medicare rebates or shift some drugs from Medicare Part B to Medicare Part D, which would cost Big Pharma billions in reduced reimbursements.

In exchange, the Pharmaceutical Researchers and Manufacturers Association (PhRMA) agreed to cut $80 billion in projected costs to taxpayers and senior citizens over ten years. Or, as the memo says: “Commitment of up to $80 billion, but not more than $80 billion.”

So, today we get a viral email filled with bullet points, the magic breakdown of 8 in each section.

The mind reels.

After watching what happened to Hillarycare, why wasn’t the Obama White House prepared with a bullet point presentation, email, or at least something showing what Pres. Obama wanted to accomplish on health care? A presidential wish list if nothing else. A simple list of what the Administration wanted to accomplish that lawmakers could have had in their hands to at least show some of the goals. The only answer I can come up with is that Obama wanted Congress to do it and he’s paying for not aggressively getting involved from the start. That is, until it came to PhRMA.

Stunningly, the Obama administration never saw it coming, preferring to play bipartisan footsies while making deals, and Democrats in Congress who’d been there before thought an Obama presidency would automatically make for smoother sailing.

Otherwise Pelosi would never have allowed the end-of-life counseling in the bill, even as courageous as it was, because it fueled the most angry reaction yet. Amnesia setting in on just how involved seniors are in politics, especially when it concerns their lives. This one provision alone pushed Obama into explaining instead of selling, and if you’re explaining away a negative talking point you’ve already lost.

Today Chuck Grassley announced the end-of-life provisions would be dropped. Who knew?

What a mess.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Hillary Serves Up Jeb, Tina Serves Up Hillary

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton compared Nigeria’s corruption and electoral problems with the 2000 Florida presidential election recount during a town hall meeting today in Abuja, Nigeria. Answering a question about Nigeria’s recent election, Clinton said, “In 2000, our presidential election came down to one state where the brother of the man running for President was the governor of the state. So we have our problems too.” -ABC News

Clinton’s candor on parade in Africa.

First came Congo, where in the midst of a groundbreaking stance against sexual violence, Clinton’s emotions got the best of her. Now in Nigeria a comparison with election 2000 that is sure to raise her nemesis, the Republican right.

But it was Tina Brown, an earnest Hillary supporter, who released her pent up frustrations with Clinton on “Morning Joe.”

JOE SCARBOROUGH: Tina Brown, what’s wrong with my former, ex-girlfriend Hillary Clinton?

TINA BROWN: What’s wrong with Hillary is one week too long on this African hellish tour that she’s on. Think of it from the human point of view: she is in her second week. She’s hot. She is feeling fat. She had this horrible business where she suddenly lost it a bit over the whole Bill thing.

SCARBOROUGH: Take the microphone away, get her on a — maybe Bill ought to leave Vegas –

BROWN: I agree with that. She ought to get back to the gym!

Y-ouch.

But before we get to a man wouldn’t have to endure such insults discussion, let’s remember what Al Gore endured through the ’08 speculation tour, when his rotundness and his beard were turned into fodder via candidate watch. And we may not like Rush’s politics, but he’s been subjected to far worse.

The glamorous Hillary of 2008 has receded from view; the studious, earnest image of world traveling diplomat, Secretary Clinton, a bit startling for some.

Sect. Clinton’s Africa trip has been arduous, with Hillary the only secretary of state to ever venture into the dangerous locales of the African continent that have been at war for ages. It’s been a grueling trip.

ABUJA, Nigeria — It was hot. She was tired. And it had been a long day in Africa. … .. Either way, the hubbub seemed to drain Mrs. Clinton. Until then, she had seemed impervious to the jet lag that was stalking her entourage from the moment they plopped down in Kenya. But on Tuesday, especially after meeting Congolese rape victims and touring a squalid refugee camp where thousands of people lived cheek by sunken cheek, Mrs. Clinton seemed enervated. Perhaps it was the sight of so many civilians suffering from a conflict the world has failed to stop. She said a few words on the plane ride back from Congo, but her language was not as emotional as it had been, or as urgent.

Finding common ground and reaching out is a diplomat’s first job, as is the appearance of unflappability. Hillary Clinton’s celebrity status makes her historic tour of seven African countries the talk of the world, especially when the Secretary is offering quotes that bite, rather than soothe.

Some people love Clinton’s candor, others don’t, but in her heightened world celebrity status, Hillary’s remarks are getting a lot more attention than the focus of her trip, which really deserves to be hailed as historic.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Holbrooke Uses Pornography Standard for Afghanistan

–updated below–

“The military struggle with U.S. troops is not an open-ended event, but our civilian assistance will continue,” the special envoy said. But he added that defining ultimate success would require applying a “Supreme Court test,” a reference to a line by Justice Potter Stewart about identifying pornography. “We’ll know it when we see it,” Holbrooke said.Spencer Ackerman

Needless to say, Holbrooke’s beauty of a quote was picked up quickly, by Anderson Cooper.

Laid up with an annoying injury (hazards of being an overagressive middle aged jock), I had to read about Holbrooke’s words through reports (video here). Let’s just say using the pornography standard to describe how we’ll know that we’ve succeeded in Afghanistan doesn’t flood me with confidence.

Known for his overabundance of confidence, Mr. Holbrooke’s obviously glib retort is representative of the diplomat’s attitude towards what he knows and his assessment of what that knowledge means in answers to questions. But it grossly overestimates the confidence of the crowd watching Obama’s Afghanistan strategy right now, myself included as I become increasingly skeptical of what I’m hearing out of Obama’s team about our Afghanistan policy (for the first time), which seems to be on the cusp of escalation.

Feeling reassured?, tweeted Abuaardvark. With lots of tweets available for the event @ #afpakupdate.

Joshua Keating summed up the event.

If Holbrooke has a problem with the picture the public is getting of the mission in Afghanistan, he had a pretty big bully pulpit today to discuss his goals and tactics. It seems like a missed opportunity.

Washington Post tells one story of Marines fighting in Afghansitan in detail today.

However, the must read Afghanistan story today is from the Independent, which talks about the battle in the “Taliban heartland” of Helmand.

I’m going to add a link and a key graph about a story circulating, which appeared in the German weekly Stern that mentions Ahmed Wali Karzai, Karzai’s half-brother, who has been rumored to be linked to the opium trade in reports.

… .. That is what an unit of British Special Forces had to find out when they arrested a Taliban group in Kandahar province on July 22. The men had been guarding an opium depot. When questioned they admitted cooperation with a police officer named Schirin. After arresting and questioning the officer the Brits discovered a much larger opium depot, guarded by 18 police officers. But this success immediately became a problem: According to several witnesses, the opium as well as the storage area were the property of Ahmed Wali Karzai.

Allegedly, interior minister Hanif Atmar and President Karzai own a video of the questioning, and some embassies in Kabul have been informed as well. But nothing happens, as no one wants to know about the incident. “For years, we’re telling ourselves and the world a lie”, says a diplomat in Kabul who has intimate knowledge of the Kabul power structure. “We claim we are building democracy in Afghanistan. In reality, we have created a narco state.”

Read full story · Comments are closed

READER DIARY: Postcard from the Edge of Insanity

TM NOTE: This is a diary authored by reader Lake Lady that is posted “In the News”. It covers Sen. McCaskill’s recent town hall. This evening the Senator was on “The O’Reilly Factor” saying the same thing Lake Lake describes below. As an aside, I was born and raised in Missouri, so it’s interesting to see a Democratic senator from that very purple state try to navigate the health care quagmire, amidst very organized efforts to marginalize its importance. Sen. McCaskill, opining about respecting the crowd, while also saying it was grass roots, chooses to ignore the political realities of what we’re all facing, which Lake Lady describes very well. It’s tough being a Democratic senator right now, especially in Missouri, if you want to keep being a senator. McCaskill obviously knows how to do the dance. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, because I’ve seen what comes out of Missouri, having watched politics there since I was a kid, as my big brother was a politician there back then (and has spoken to McCaskill, as he’s a long-time resident of Missouri). McCaskill is a vast improvement from the usual Missouri fare. See Kit Bond.

_________________________

Postcard from the Edge of Insanity – Hillsboro MO., Claire McCaskill’s townhall.

As I drove down the brand new, divided highway leading to Hillsboro, I reflected on the fact that my smooth ride was due to it being the county seat of my blue county. I did not know what to expect having been to so many tame Democratic events in this town.

I was pleased to see police presence as they guided us into the Community College where the event was to be held. Traffic slowed and I could read all the “anti” posters; anti-abortion, anti-global warming, anti-healthcare reform, you get the picture.

I parked next to a van with a big sign advertising the website for the St.Louis chapter of Teabaggers. I grabbed my placard, “Civility is a sign of Intelligence”, and walked behind the parked cars, reading their bumper stickers, wondering who was going to be inside?

The campus security was cheerful enough for the day’s work, chatty as people walked by. Judging the people I was walking with I could have been heading for a revival.

Outside the field house more police and the usual suspects holding “anti” posters. There were some funny pro healthcare posters, saying things like, “Keep Your Government Hands off My Medicare”. I wondered if the irony would be lost on this crowd?

I was among the last allowed inside. I did not want to end up in front. I wanted to be close to an exit. I was right.

Luckily, there was a group of local Democratic elected officials, party people and organizers I knew who had the same idea I did and were sitting in the bleachers close to the exit. I joined them. They were all kind of rolling their eyes, wondering what was going to happen.

Out of a crowd of 2,500 hundred people, we were outnumbered three to one.

It was appropriate for this to be held in a field house because the crowd was spoiling for some blood sport.You could feel it in the air.

Claire opened with some smart tactics. She had a minister give a prayer and she asked her mother,a real character beloved by Dems, to say a word.

She asked vets to stand, a fair number stood. She assured everyone she intended to be fair and pointed to her two fish bowls full of questions. She had a perfect lesson plan but she did not get the chance to teach.

The crowd was already restless, spoiling, and when she asked for a show of hands, for the people who where there because they were against any healthcare reform what so ever, they roared as hundreds of hands shot up.

She chose two women with their hands in the air to come up and pull out the questions from the fishbowels. Great! There went any chance of a progressive question being asked!

She sweet talked, she used her mother voice,she even used her high school principal voice a couple of times. (Never her prosecutor or state auditor voice.) It did not matter.

They booed, they hissed, we shushed, they called out insults or Rush lines. One man standing next to the bleachers holding a, “Don’t Tread on Me” flag kept yelling out, “liar!” every time she spoke. Finally, I snapped and called out to him “pipe down”, he screwed up his face and spit at me to “shut-up”. A guy sitting behind me in the bleachers was about eye level with him. He put his face about two inches away and said, “Hey buddy, f*** you!” They started this, ‘ya wanna take it outside’ thing and a couple of sheriff’s deputies materialized out of nowhere and calmed everyone down. I thanked the guy behind me on my way out.

These people were haters. They hated McCaskill. They hated Obama. They hated the government. They never voted for her or any other Democrat. They were a combination Teabaggers, Rethuglicans, garden variety wingnuts and people driven there by their poisonous preachers who think Obama is the antichrist. The people who actually lived in Jefferson County probably fell into the last category. They were anti-science, anti taxes, ignorant, misinformed to a ludicrous degree. Nothing, anyway resembling democracy was taking place.

In her appearance on, “Morning Joe” this morning, Senator McCaskill was chipper, blathering on about being proud to be a part of democracy.

Since then she has tweeted that when she reviewed a film of the townhall, she realized that she may have been a little condescending (the few times she did make a point that shut them up for a split second) at times, and she was sorry for that.

Appeasement of people who hate her.

I am very depressed.

At one point we noticed a camera bag sitting by itself in the middle of an empty space on the gym floor. A few of us moseyed out the exit and hung around outside for awhile. When we went back in the police had a sniffer dog in that spot. I was grateful that they had been prepared. I guess it belonged to the gang of press. Nothing came of it.

I am willing to walk my talk but I am not willing to lose my legs.

That is the way it went.

This diary has been edited, but not for content, with YouTube added.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Will Al Qaeda Fill Void in Pakistan?

Having heard Nicholas Schmidle at the New America Foundation, who is an expert on the region, this video from TNR is interesting. Schmidle’s analysis of Baitullah Mehsud’s likely death is that in this one instance it proves the U.S. and Pakistan are working very well together. Baitullah Mehsud was reportedly behind Benazir Bhutto’s assassination, but also rumored to have masterminded the bombings in Rawalpindi.

Today, a U.S. missile struck Mehsud’s stronghold in South Waziristan, with this same story reiterating that Mehsud was most likely killed last week.

Officials in Washington and Islamabad say they are almost certain that last Wednesday’s drone strike killed Baitullah Mehsud, Pakistan’s most wanted man, although Taliban commanders insist their leader is still alive.

Taliban spokesman Azam Tariq claimed the missile stuck only civilians, while also pontificating that “Baitullah Mehsud is safe. He is in good health.” This is a lie, as Mehsud has been reported as “gravely ill,” due to kidney disease. Gen. Jones said on “Meet the Press” that he’s 90% sure they got Mehsud.

As Schmidle says in his brief interview with TNR, Mehsud’s loss would be mostly symbolic, but still a “major rupture.” If Al Qaeda feels they need to assert themselves, suicide attacks could skyrocket, with the Taliban also morphing with Al Qaeda’s entrance. But if Al Qaeda fills the vacuum in Pakistan, Pres. Obama’s Af-Pak strategy will be in for new challenges.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Exploiting End-of-Life, Hyperbole and Sect. 1233

Any column that begins with “Sarah Palin was right, the second time” should give anyone pause.

Kathleen Parker is worried and writes about “Easing the ‘Death Panel’ Fear.” Given the hyperbole surrounding addressing the subject of end-of-life, at least Ms. Parker gives us this: For purposes of civil discourse, let’s assume that no one wants to kill off old people. How magnanimous.

Parker’s main question in her column, as to mandatory action, would have been answered if she’d just bothered to read into the subject, instead of offering more drivel to the debate. From the AP “fact check”:

Q: Is anything required?

Monsignor Charles Fahey, 76, a Catholic priest who is chairman of the board of the National Council on Aging, a nonprofit service and advocacy group, says no.

The Monsignor, my kind of priest:

“We have to make decisions that are deliberative about our health care at every moment,” Fahey said. “What I have said is that if I cannot say another prayer, if I cannot give or get another hug, and if I cannot have another martini — then let me go.”

Amen.

It has nothing to do with “civil discourse,” obviously, but the fear of death that Americans would rather leave to their God and their priest, as our overriding philosophy on these issues is “that it’s in God’s hands.” Unfortunately, when the kids of your husband and his ex start demanding things upon his death things can quickly spiral out of control at a time when life’s gone to hell and you are least capable of handling the bickering relatives.

How do mere humans balance the immense powers of “can” against the humbling moral quandary of “should”? This is partly what the bill’s end-of-life section aims to address.
ad_icon

Theoretically, rational people can dwell happily on the same page. Wouldn’t we all rather make end-of-life provisions voluntarily, while we’re still healthy, than burden family members, who would be reluctant (one hopes) to pull the plug on our darling selves?

Of course. In practice, however, the debate is over whether these consultations are conclusively voluntary — and the bill, to the extent it is comprehensible at all, is vague enough to cause concern.

In one respect, we’re confronting the Terry Schiavo, anti abortion, pro selective life crowd at their ultimate fear point. Engaging in a rational discussion about end-of-life care before the inevitable beckons, where the religious and righteous fundamentalists think mere humans should not tread.

From one of the comment sections in HR 3200, Section 1233, Susanfrom29 gets it:

Medicare is now offering to pay for a patient to sit down and discuss with his physician what he would like to see happen at the end of his life. This will make it so much easier for those of us who will be left behind wondering if we made the right decision on a loved one’s behalf.

Quality of life being the central issue of life and health for some of us, this “death panel” hyperbole and “euthanasia” fearmongering directly confronts this notion of individual control and choice, something that always makes Republicans freak, making the right rise up in fear revealing that their faith doesn’t include the human responsibility, free will part we each play in life and end-of-life decision making. The notion that we have some freedom to choose the path the end takes that lies beyond God’s grasp.

It took tremendous courage for the House to tackle end-of-life planning. There is nothing more progressive than the notion that we have a duty to ourselves and our families to orchestrate the end as much as we do to plan our life’s goals in happier moments.

Ironically, the headline the pops up in Firefox for Ms. Parker’s column starts with “Clarity for End-of-Lif…”, obviously because someone at the Post found the headline “Easing the ‘Death Panel’ Fear” too glib and disrespectful for a subject this serious.

Parker is asking for clarity in Section 1233 in HR 3200, specifically that “not mandatory” be added to the the end-of-life provisions in this section. She wants the non-existent end-of-life confusion to remain a hallmark of death. She wants to make sure in our saner, healthier days that we don’t commit to writing something we’ll regret when the end of life is near. She seems to want to ignore passing for the permanent, which doesn’t exist.

Because H.R. 3200 dares to offer dignity at the end-of-life through reimbursement of counseling for the elderly, the right won’t take a leap of faith.

As far as I can tell, the Monsignor is correct and there is nothing “mandatory” about Section 1233. There is also nothing demanding you meet only every 5 years; just that Medicare will only cover consultations, under certain circumstances. As always, those with the means can consult with their doctor whenever they want. Those without means, however, get the benefit and peace of mind that someone is there to help, for which Medicare will pay, under certain guidelines. Grace in death becoming a choice to the less financially able.

Ms. Parker is also very concerned about the physicians, that something will go awry and they will jeopardize their reimbursements. A moot point for such a monumental discussion, but that’s where the right is always trained: saving capitalism first, putting humans second.

However, amidst the “death panels” and “euthanasia” fearmonger, even in Kathleen Parker’s column, with its facetious grace about “civil discourse”, what pervades the subject about end-of-life planning is the reality that the right doesn’t seem to want to accept that each individual actually has a say over how the end of their life is directed. That this choice is as important to plan as the faith of one’s life and that in the end God may be in our heart, but we die alone, no matter who is at our side.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Violence in Air at Grievance Town Halls

It’s like that Phil Collins song, you can feel it coming in the air at every town hall. Just ask Arlen Specter, who faced a grievance mob today, complete with boos when Specter spoke of Obama’s Americanness. Town halls turned grievance fests with health care only the launching pad for people to act out.

“IT IS TIME TO WATER THE TREE OF LIBERTY,” was printed across William Kostric’s sign today. It’s the same quote used in the video by a different man (h/t Peter Daou) only in a separate context. But it all implies the same thing. That is if you finish Thomas Jefferson’s quote, which Kostric was careful not to do and the man in the video just hinted at himself. With a wink and a nod the message is sent, the code easy to decipher. None of this having anything to do with health care.

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”

William Kostric, given a platform on “Hardball” today, utilized the usual rhetoric gun fanatics employ when challenged: If more people had guns there would be less crime. These fanatics contend that if all the good guys and gals carried weapons the bad guys wouldn’t have a chance. As a gun owner myself, I’ve heard this ad nauseam, which usually leads me to laugh in their face. It’s as if to say to a single woman that she should own a gun to stay safe in her home, even if guns scare the crap out of her and she doesn’t want to own one. Shorter: It’s all her fault she’s not safe because she refuses to own a firearm. The perfect NRA sales pitch. The reality that people have a right to feel and be safe in their own homes, regardless of whether they own a firearm, never occurring to the nuts.

As the man in the video squeals Jefferson’s threat through his bullhorn, “Read what Jefferson said about the Tree of Liberty – it’s coming baby”, never having the nerve to say it out loud, because he knows very well what it implies.

As witnessed today at Arlen Specter’s town hall, you get a further sense of the grievance fest we’re witnessing across this country, all on the back of Obama’s push to get health care reform. With right wing radio giving out the call to arms, inciting their angry army to take to the town halls to defend “liberty,” though Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity (and his mini me, Mark Levin), and other hate speech peddlers like Ann Coulter have no clue what the incitement they’re stirring can manifest.

Chris Matthews said it simply on his show today.

“I think some of the people are upset because we have a black president.”Chris Matthews, “Hardball”

A very dangerous pattern has taken shape, complete with gun toting, xenophobic, angry haters each with their own personal grievance and ax to grind.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Obama Steady at New Hampshire Town Hall

–updated–

At the airport – someone wrote the words “Stop Government Health Care” on the doors of an aircraft hangar in sight of press plane. – Mark Knoller


VIDEO: Obama addresses “death panels” and
insurance co. rationing v doctor guided decisions.

Outside the town hall there were a lot of protesters on both sides, as Knoller reports, but also the early livestream clip showed. Signs “Nobama Health Care”, “Socialism” with a line through it, “Stop abortion now.”

In other rancid news, a swastika was painted on Rep. David Scott’s office door, after he held a health care town hall that turned raucus.

Obama’s health care town hall today opened with a plea from a woman who is “uninsurable,” saying “hope is her only health care plan.” She pleaded for everyone to stand up and demand health care reform, which got her a standing ovation. She then proudly introduced Pres. Barack Obama.

After event began, Obama clearly states that he doesn’t think government should get between patients and doctors, but neither should insurance companies.

“I’m not promoting a single-payer plan.” – Pres. Obama

Close to the end of the town hall, Obama mentions diabetes and obesity, including the importance of losing weight and diet, bu also the need to change reimbursement and “also the care who prevents the amputation.”

The last questioner was from a skeptic and part of a group Obama asked to be part of the questioners. The guy said off the top that “he turned himself in” on the White House website, admitting he was a skeptic. Obama laughed, stopped everything for a moment to say the media is drumming this nonsense up. Said it’s about answering questions of the skeptics, not “collecting an enemies list.”

Someone tell Rush.

“The status quo is not working for you,” Obama said, ending an event that will look very good on the nightly news.

Read full story · Comments are closed

With Backdrop of Rampant Rape in Congo, Clinton Snaps

–bumped–

“To avoid getting raped, after 6 p.m., women are not allowed to go out of the house,” said Maria Bitondo, who said she was among three women attacked by a soldier last month. “With the soldiers here, no woman is safe to go out and walk. We do not even go to the bathroom at night.” On Monday, a coalition of 88 aid groups called the operation, which is supported by the United Nations, “a human tragedy” and urged Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who is to visit eastern Congo on Tuesday, to push for better civilian protection. Clinton has vowed to make the prevention of sexual violence a priority in Congo, where the United States pays about a quarter of the cost of U.N. peacekeeping efforts. – Congo’s Rape Epidemic Worsens During U.S.-Backed Military Operation

It’s the You talkin’ to me?, secretary of state edition.

Secretary Clinton, continuing her Africa trip, was not amused when the translation came across from a questioner asking her to respond on what her husband would think about Chinese financial contracts in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. However, it seems the translation was screwed up and the questioner was asking Clinton about Obama, not her husband.

As you can see in the video, Clinton was ticked off at being asked what a male leader thought, especially when her purpose in this region is to draw a bull’s eye on the rape and torture of women in the Congo.

The United States Secretary of State obviously didn’t appreciate the misogyny, which is rampant in the Congo and other African nations, born out by the questioner expecting her to “channel” a male. Assistant Secretary P.J. Crowley responded.

“The Secretary of State is going to Goma Tuesday, to draw attention to the plight of women who are victims of rape as a weapon of war” in Congo, he said. “She did react to what she heard,” Crowley explained. Even if the interpreter mixed up the translation, he said, “you can’t separate the question from the setting.”

As the Washington Post story quoted at the top reports, Congolese President Joseph Kabila has declared “zero tolerance” regarding sexual assaults and violence against women, but so far it’s just words.

There can be no doubt that Clinton came off harsh in this setting. A little righteous indignation from the most powerful female persona on the planet was in order, especially considering women in the Congo are in danger most of the hours of their waking and sleeping lives.

CNN reports that after the event Clinton and the questioner “seemed to have reached an understanding,” according to Crowley.

But seriously, you cannot bring basic human rights to women in places like the Congo if the men there don’t wake up to the respect women deserve, highlighting how far we have to go if not even the U.S. secretary of state is treated with respect.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Obama Throws Pelosi Under a Bus for ‘Un-american’ Rant

“I think there’s actually a pretty long tradition of people shouting at politicians in America,” White House deputy press secretary Bill Burton told reporters on Air Force One when asked about the comments. – ABC News

Well, this was predictable. After yesterday’s op-ed, where Pelosi and Hoyer went out on a very long limb calling the town hall brawl inciters “un-American,” today we get the White House sawing off the branch.

…and launching a new website to counter the crazies: Health Insurance Reform Reality Check. The New York Times instant review gives you how traditional media will frame it:

But in introducing the Web site, White House officials were tacitly acknowledging a difficult reality: they are suddenly at risk of losing control of the public debate over a signature issue for Mr. Obama and are now playing defense in a way they have not since last year’s campaign.

Predictable.

As for Obama and Pelosi-Hoyer, I used the same term the other day, labeling Eric Cantor’s rhetoric in Israel un-American, because on foreign soil he offered an opposing foreign policy to the sitting commander in chief. I stand by it and think that’s fitting, especially when you’re doing so in the Middle East, which is fraught with danger on policy. No doubt the White House would disagree, though I have no intention of making a softer statement about what Cantor did, as I know exactly what would have happened if a Dem would have done such a thing to a Rep. president.

But as much as we need to label, ostracize and shame the wingnut town hall mob crew, calling them un-American just sets up their people higher up in the conservative food chain. Peter Daou made that very argument yesterday.

You also have to expect the White House to say something like they did, with Burton’s full statement, he was clear to offer caveats on what he called “our pretty long tradition.”

Now, if you just want to come to a town hall so that you can disrupt and so that you can scream over another person, he doesn’t think that that’s productive.

Last week Robert Gibbs labeled the brawlers as “manufacturing” their outrage.

As I said earlier, labeling the town hall crazies won’t be enough. The “un-American” line simply succeeded in fueling conservatives up the political food chain, got the President involved, who felt he had to cut Pelosi and Hoyer loose.

We’ll see how the President feels after his next town hall.

Read full story · Comments are closed

In the News & Tech Weirdness

We’ve been having some tech troubles the last couple of days, which are continuing “In the News,” as you all know.

Apologies all around. We’re working on it. Be “we” I mean my tech team, with help from me mostly by being annoying.

We’ll get everything humming again as soon as we can.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Why Health Care ‘Reform’ Will Fail

But we also need to transform what is covered. If we want to make affordable health care available to the 48 million Americans who do not have health insurance, then the fundamental causes of many chronic diseases need to be addressed — which are primarily the lifestyle choices we make each day — rather than only literally or figuratively bypassing them. – Dr. Dean Ornish

Speaker Pelosi and Rep. Steny Hoyer have penned a whopper of an op-ed: ‘Un-American’ attacks can’t derail health care debate. Wanna bet? To some extent it’s already happened. But it does prove that the politics surrounding health care “reform” have nothing to do with actual reform or making anyone healthier. Just read the opening line: Americans have been waiting for nearly a century for quality, affordable health care. Never mind that the actual solution has been in our hands for decades.

But finally, someone spotlights the real issues behind health care and why whatever “reform” comes down will ultimately fail, both articles at Huffington Post. And neither has a thing to do with this drivel coming from Democrats, though it’s very safe to say that Republicans are miles worse.

Following the health care “reform” debate as closely as anyone, the entire discussion has left me cold. It’s all about what can the health care industry do for us, with absolutely no focus on what we have to do for ourselves. It’s why whatever is done on health care won’t really mean anything as to cost, because we’ll still expect the same things without focusing on how we get sick in the first place and how our own choices impact our health and lives. It’s about lifestyle, something I’ve been saying to friends and anyone who will listen for decades.

Many people are just too lazy. Want a prescription, a diagnosis, with a doctor deciding what you should do. Even as critical as health providers are to us all, because sometimes we do get hit from out of the blue, vitality and quality of life are mostly about what we do every day that makes us healthy or threatens our life.

Dr. Ornish has the cred, even as people like me have already learned the lesson of lifestyle. Though we don’t always do all that’s necessary to be healthy, letting our lives, work, relationships and other distractions take us down roads that make us sick. Some Americans do get it and our intent remains focused on adding to our own health through the choices we make on how to live our lives.

Lifestyle changes are not only as good as drugs but often even better. For example, a major study showed that lifestyle changes are even more effective than diabetes drugs such as metformin in reducing the incidence of diabetes in persons at high risk, with lower costs and fewer side-effects.

… .. In our experience, it is not enough to focus only on patient behaviors such as diet and exercise; we often need to work at a deeper level. Depression, loneliness, and lack of social support are also epidemic in our culture. These affect not only quality of life but also survival. Several studies has shown that people who are lonely, depressed, and isolated are many times more likely to get sick and die prematurely than those who are not. In part, this is mediated by the fact that they are more likely to engage in self-destructive behaviors when they feel this way, but also via mechanisms that are not well-understood. For example, many people smoke or overeat when they are stressed, lonely, or depressed.

What is sustainable is joy, pleasure, and freedom, not deprivation and austerity. When you eat a healthier diet, quit smoking, exercise, meditate, and have more love in your life, then your brain receives more blood and oxygen, so you think more clearly, have more energy, need less sleep.

On and on this excellent post goes, all of the good doctor’s points ones that anyone serious about health care should read and take to heart.

But that’s not something Washington will stress, because telling the American people the truth about health care would mean demanding they do something about their own lifestyles.

I say this as someone who has never been rich in my life, that is not in terms of money. Choices have always had to be made on what I could afford, with vitamins always chosen over chips or some other empty food, though I love tortilla chips and salsa as much as anyone, snacking on them at cocktail hour at our place. I eat pizza too, but only on rare occasion, because not only are the empty carbs deadly and the fat content a killer, but I pay for it the next day in energy and vitality, which is the inspiration for everything I add (or subtract) to my life. So, no, my choices aren’t perfect every day, but the intent is there non stop. This has meant I’m healthy most of the time, which as you get older means more control over your quality of life, no matter how long you live. As someone who cured herself of debilitating, blinding migraines, trust me when I say I’ve been tested.

More tough love from Dr. Weil:

Washington is working on reform initiatives that focus on one problem: the fact that the system is too expensive (and consequently too exclusive.) Reform proposals, such as the “public option” for government insurance or calls for drug makers to drop prices, are aimed mostly at boosting affordability and access. Make it cheap enough, the thinking goes, and the 46 million Americans who can’t afford coverage will finally get their fair share.

But what’s missing, tragically, is a diagnosis of the real, far more fundamental problem, which is that what’s even worse than its stratospheric cost is the fact that American health care doesn’t fulfill its prime directive — it does not help people become or stay healthy. It’s not a health care system at all; it’s a disease management system, and making the current system cheaper and more accessible will just spread the dysfunction more broadly.

So, no matter what bill comes out of Congress, you’ll pardon me if I don’t get too exercised about the outcome. It won’t make any difference at all in the average American’s health, unless each of us quits asking what the health care industry can do for us, and instead start acting on what we can do for ourselves.

So, as Pelosi and Hoyer opine on “lower costs, better care”, and Republicans continue to act out in town hall brawls, the fundamental issue of how good health is manifested is once again ignored.

Quit kidding yourself, America.

You can’t even write about the obese or purposely fat without being scolded that you’re being prejudice. We should be as hard on them as we are on smokers, just to see what that would manifest in health care savings, not to mention on quality of life of Americans from all ages.

Have it all, no responsibility required doesn’t work in life and it sure doesn’t work when it comes to your health. Without prevention and each person taking on their own lifestyle restructuring, the health of the average American is not going to change one iota.

But just maybe health care “reform” will allow more people to manage their diseases, as Dr. Weil puts it. We’ll see. Just don’t kid yourself that this is actually “reform”.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Is Obama Ready to Make Afghanistan his Iraq?

From preventing failed states to nation building and beyond, mission creep Obama style is now in play in Afghanistan.

Anthony H. Cordesman’s in the UK Times reveals the problem. It’s “clear, hold, build” add “shape”, making a quartet of goals, add nine brigades. That’s right nine. Now Cordesman is not exactly your average expert mouthing off. He was part of Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s “Strategic Assessment Group” and is also associated with CSIS in D.C.

Nine brigades is around 45,000 troops in NATO terms.

If you do the math, this would bring our forces up to around 100,000, mimicking U.S. troop strength in Iraq.

But that’s only one part of Cordesman’s column, with another section sounding positively frightening in context with the rest, as it appears Mr. Cordesman believes the U.S. can change the very fabric of Afghanistan, including the foundational aspect of this country’s long history.

The military problems however, are only part of the story. The Afghan Government is corrupt, grossly overcentralised, lacking in capacity, and virtually absent in large parts of Afghanistan. The international aid effort continues to pursue unrealistic medium and long-term goals, and many organisations largely ignore the civil side of war fighting. What should be an integrated civil-military effort, focused on winning the war in the field, is a dysfunctional, wasteful mess that is crippled by bureaucratic divisions. Afghan power brokering, national caveats and tensions, and a failure to make good on pledges waste aid resources at every level.

There’s not an expert that doesn’t realize Afghanistan is “grossly overcentralised… virtually absent in large parts of Afghanistan,” but the notion that the U.S. is going to nation build this barren, extremely rugged land, while the American people nod and foot the bill, is extraordinarily naive, it seems to me.

As for the Taliban, Reagan helped Zia of Pakistan build this group up to what it is today and anyone thinking we can out last them or defeat them is seriously kidding himself. Hekmatyar and Haqqani aside, this next section from Cordesman reveals why my hair is standing on end.

This means shifting from a focus on defeating the enemy in the field to shaping operations that can secure the population centres, clear out the insurgents, hold the cleared areas in ways that provide lasting security, and then build a level of governance, economy and prompt justice that leads to sustained popular support. It is the strategy now called “shape, clear, hold, and build”.

Not to keep the Afghanistan mission simple and just to troop escalation, the New York Times is reporting that the U.S. is also planning to once again target drug lords running the opium trade.

To again remind people, having supported Obama’s original Afghanistan strategy, keeping the country from becoming a failed state so al Qaeda could move in again, this new campaign coming from the military side of things continues to make me nervous and pessimistic about Pres. Obama’s awareness of what he’s contemplating stepping into.

All for protecting Afghan women, the news drip, drip, dripping out of the assessment crew is heading into territory Obama should think thrice before entering.

I’m not prepared to say I’m against what’s rumbling as Obama’s new Afghan strategy, but I’m close.

If Pres. Obama does go in this direction, escalating troops, targeting drug lords, nation building the vast ruggedness of Afghanistan by believing we can decentralize a country that’s known nothing else, as well as eradicating Taliban elements without realizing when we leave they’ll step back in, it will once again prove to me that if he’d been in the Senate in 2002 he would have voted along with other Democrats to preemptively invade Iraq. Because now that he’s on the inside looking out he’s understanding first hand that responsibilities are seen differently when you’re part of the power structure with the military giving you advice, altering how you look at things.

We’re about to see if the Obama who made his anti Iraq war speech really understood what he was talking about. Escalating and expanding his Afghan mission will tell it all.

It will also illustrate that when it comes to military misadventures, Democrats have forgotten the lessons of John F. Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson, but also the lessons of George W. Bush. God help us.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Newt Allies Himself with Sarah’s ‘Death Panels’

Watching Newt Gingrich this morning on “This Week” was like watching someone out of an alternate universe from a previous century, especially when compared to Howard Dean. But Newt’s apparent seduction by Sarah Palin after she made her my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s “death panel”, statement lunacy is really one for the political books.

“You are asking us to trust turning power over to the government, when there are clearly people in American who believe in establishing euthanasia, including selective standards.” – Newt Gingrich on “This Week”

It really isn’t that impressive that other Republicans are distancing themselves from Palin when you have Newt Gingrich embracing Sarah’s Twilight Zone talking points.

Didn’t Sunday used to be the day “serious” men gathered to discuss the real challenges we face, because women are seldom seen, as adversaries from both sides offered cogent solutions?

Instead, Gingrich joined the wacky wing of the Republican Party while using every opportunity he could to pimp his think tank.

Meanwhile, Dr. Dean played the grown up. The best one out front on health care that we’ve got.

I’m just thankful it wasn’t Sebelius.


TM NOTE: Yes, we know about the URL crazy coding. The hosting company is working on it. Appreciate your emails!

Read full story · Comments are closed

Olbermann-O’Reilly Plot Thickens, Add Situational Outrage

Salter today:

Mr. Olbermann told viewers on June 1 that he would halt his jokes about Fox News because he believed that Fox had played a part in inciting the death of the abortion doctor George Tiller. Inside Fox, executives chuckled. They knew that a pact had already been struck by Mr. Olbermann’s bosses to end the feud.

Weighing in yesterday, and I still think it today, this is what I wrote: Thirdly, Olbermann’s statement about Dr. Tiller is also true. Considering O’Reilly’s incitement and the subsequent murder, it’s really incumbent upon everyone to take O’Reilly’s hate speech more seriously than to constantly throw rhetorical pies at the Fox pundit.

It has always bothered me that Olbermann’s O’Reilly campaign tended to make the Fox blowhard look silly rather than a provider of hate speech while weaving never ending webs of wickedness, like his campaigns against judges. But in making O’Reilly look silly, Olbermann actually did his bosses a favor.

As there is a real reason GE would want O’Reilly shut down, Olbermann not egging him on. The Fox anchor, in between his heinous “Tiller the baby killer” campaigns, went after GE hard. From 2008, when the Washington Post first reported on the feud/truce attempts:

The high-level appeals failed, and O’Reilly has escalated his criticism of GE in recent weeks, declaring, “If my child were killed in Iraq, I would blame the likes of Jeffrey Immelt.”

GE has long had a corporate presence in Iran, which U.S. officials say is providing weapons and training for Shiite militias in the Iraq conflict. Under growing criticism from the public and its own shareholders, GE announced in 2005 that it would accept no new business in Iran and would wind down existing contracts, which mostly involved sales of oil, gas and energy and health-care equipment. The remaining work, valued at less than $50 million, amounts to less than .01 percent of GE’s income, and the company says the final four contracts will expire within weeks.

Progressives as a whole, myself included, have decried O’Reilly’s gotcha journalism, as his roving producers ambush subjects, which also happened to Mr. Imelt on the very issue O’Reilly helped expose.

Never mind this is exactly what progressives tried to do ambushing Rep. lawmakers on the birther issue, which I’m all for, by the way.

Maybe I’m the only one who feels this way, but our situational outrage is taking us down the rabbit hole here, folks.

As someone who was all over MSNBC and Olbermann last year, as were a select few, while others understandably preferred to stay out of the pie fight while ignoring the bias in the reporting, I find this sudden epiphany regarding MSNBC and Fox a bit ironic.

All last year we had columnists and opinion writers holding court on cable, opining without disclosing what side they were on, the same thing happening online as well. People in anchor chairs pompously pontificating without declaring their bias, which was mimicked in new media circles as well, without most of them thinking a thing about their own situational ethics or transparent hypocrisy.

Silent winks exchanged between journalists and cable pundits backing one candidate while their corporate bosses ignored it for ad revenues and ratings.

As this current tale continues to unfold, if Olbermann did indeed give a wink and nod to his corporate bosses to quit nudging the Fox host, the questions compound.

Did Olbermann ever do serious investigative stories on O’Reilly or Fox News Channel beyond opining and personally insulting him and Murdoch that wasn’t already in the news?

Did O’Reilly ever do serious investigation stories on GE, MSNBC or Olbermann?

Now weigh your answers.

More from Salter:

The advocacy group Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting asked its supporters on Friday to contact G.E., urging it to renounce the agreement with Fox.

Jeff Cohen, the founder of the group, said the deal between the two networks’ parent companies was a reason to be wary of corporate-owned TV news.

“It should remind news consumers of who calls the tune and pays the bills — and that TV reporters and even loud-mouthed commentators have corporate bosses whose interests are often not about unbridled journalism,” Mr. Cohen said.

“…a reason to be wary of corporate-owned TV news”? Is this a joke or meant as irony? Whatever.

But let’s take this wider, shall we?

Since we’re being so righteous over corporate control over stories, cash, and the lack of information being dispensed…

Understanding, respecting and accepting our special relationship with Israel, why does the traditional media rarely if ever do a single story on what Palestinians experience under the thuggery of some Israelis?

A story on Israeli settlements?

Do you remember the coverage in the U.S. over the war in 2006 between Lebanon and Israel? OKay, too much to ask.

Does anyone in the corporate media culture ever lift a finger to cover the Middle East in any manner that even hints of equanimity?

Never mind. Stupid question.

So is it any wonder the American public has a warped view of what’s happening in Israel and the Middle East? While the U.S. continues to put forth the same strategy over and over again with the same bad results?

Again, “corporate bosses whose interests are often not about unbridled journalism.” Everyone is suddenly waking up to this because of a Fox – GE truce deal?

Just. Wow.

So as exercised as everyone seems to be over the current GE – Fox feud/truce issue today, the momentary epiphany is way too small in focus and ignores a much bigger problem in the U.S. media that has existed for decades for me to take it as anything but something that accidentally broke out of the news closet and which will soon die down so everyone can get back to making money.

Read full story · Comments are closed

The Week in Africa

Clinton has been in Africa all week, her tour eventually taking her across seven countries, talking about trade, but also Somalia, that sliver on the “horn of Africa” you see on the map to the left, where it isn’t safe for Clinton to venture. What some are calling Obama’s Afghanistan. While the Washington Post reports that support for Islamist forces are at their weakest point, which could make them more desperate and dangerous.

Mrs. Clinton boldly declared that Al Shabaab, the Islamic militants that are close to toppling (Somali President Sharif Ahmed), sees “Somalia as a future haven for global terrorism.” A victory for them – much like the 1996 takeover of Afghanistan by the Taliban – might also destabilize nearby countries, such as Kenya. She noted the group’s attempt to recruit followers abroad and its alleged plot for an attack in Australia. – Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

As you see, Hillary is not exactly looking, sounding or acting like a woman upstaged, “once again” or otherwise.

Wonderful shots as well as a video of her statement after the rescue of Laura Ling and Euna Lee, which focuses on the Obama administration’s position on North Korea. Something that Sect. Clinton was firm to press remains separate from the pardon given to the U.S. journalists and the humanitarian mission of her husband, former Pres. Bill Clinton.

Enjoy.



hillary_africa3
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton with women from AWARD (African Women in Agricultural Research and Development) during a tour of the Kenyan Agricultural Research Institute (KARI) near Nairobi, Kenya August 5, 2009. [State Department photo]

hillary_africa1
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton with women from AWARD (African Women in Agricultural Research and Development) during a tour of the Kenyan Agricultural Research Institute (KARI) near Nairobi, Kenya August 5, 2009. [State Department photo]

hillary_africa2
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton plant a tree during a tour of the Kenyan Agricultural Research Institute (KARI) near Nairobi, Kenya August 5, 2009. [State Department photo]

hillary_africa4
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is greeted by a gentleman from African Heritage wearing a costume from Cameroon at the Hotel Intercontinental in Nairobi, Kenya August 4, 2009. [State Department photo]

Read full story · Comments are closed