TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Archive | August, 2009

CNN’s Big Fat Headache

Blared across Huffington Post is this headline from AP: Lou Dobbs A “Publicity Nightmare” For CNN, with the following at the link:

He’s become a publicity nightmare for CNN, embarrassed his boss and hosted a show that seemed to contradict the network’s “no bias” brand. And on top of all that, his ratings are slipping.

How does Lou Dobbs keep his job?

It’s not a simple answer. CNN insists it is standing behind Dobbs…

“Lou Dobbs becomes a real problem for CNN” says one media critic.

“CNN has got to cut Lou Dobbs loose” opines one.

“Lou Dobbs’ Ratings Decline During Birther Coverage”, screams one post.

Now Memeorandum has a story posted from World Net Daily that takes birtherism to new heights of lunacy. No, I won’t link to it, so if you’re interested you’ll have to go to Memeorandum to hunt it down yourself. Suffice it to say that it attempts to puff up the ludicrous notion forwarded by G. Gordon Liddy recently on “Hardball.” At this point you’ve got to wonder if Dobbs will help.

But seriously, what is CNN going to do about Lou Dobbs? Even if he completely drops his incessant birther babbling, can his reputation be salvaged, or more importantly for CNN, or his show saved?

Read full story · Comments are closed

Digging Down and Looking Around

“Americans are asking what’s in it for them, and I don’t think the Democrats have responded as directly as we should on that,” said Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio). With so much attention focused on the legislative brawls and missed deadlines, he said, “it looks like we’re drifting.” – Washington Post

One of my favorite stops of the day, Abu Muqawama, is interviewed by Charlie Rose regarding Afghanistan.

Marc Lynch covers the 2009 Arab Human Development Report over at The National. One segment:

The report is scathing about the corrosive effects of the “war on terror” – showing clearly how Arab authoritarian regimes reconfigured and expanded their repressive power at precisely the time when the Bush administration spoke the loudest about its “Freedom Agenda”. The authors do not need to resort to discussing Guantanamo to make this point brutally clear. They describe the anti-terror laws passed in many Arab countries, in which “imprecision and ambiguity form a threat to basic freedoms”, and note that states have clearly “failed to find the required balance between the security of society and the preservation of individual rights and freedoms”. It is this legacy that Arab reformists – and those in the West who wish to help them – now must confront. The “global war on terror” will not fade so easily away.

Read Laura Rozen on all Gen. McChrystal’s advisors.

If you’re into intelligence, Tom Ricks has reading suggestions for you.

Counterterrorism has a 2008 final report on Terrorism in the West.

Which Afghanistan War Are We Fighting? speaks for itself, via Democracy Arsenal.

…and way off the foreign policy subject, but worth reading, is the incredible tale of Annie Lebowitz’s financial catastrophe. Sobering.

Swinging back again, pressure on Iran will intensify this fall, first via economic sanctions, while Clinton’s words that the offer for engagement won’t be on the table forever now hits home. Via Haaretz:

American officials briefed Israel this week on the administration’s ideas for intensifying sanctions against Iran if it fails to respond to President Barack Obama’s offer of dialogue.

U.S. National Security Advisor James Jones, who is now in Israel to discuss Iran’s nuclear program, indicated that Tehran has until the UN General Assembly in the last week of September to respond. U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates delivered a similar message during his visit here earlier this week. If no satisfactory answer is received, the Americans said, they would work to form an international coalition to impose harsh sanctions on Iran.

Finishing back here at home on health care, with the Post offering this headline: Obama Trims Sails On Health Reform He Seeks to Rally Support. We’ll have to see what actually manifests.

… ..By leaving the bill-writing up to Congress, Obama is better-positioned to claim success no matter which bill is adopted. Already, he has abandoned his opposition to the proposed requirement that everyone have insurance, known as an individual mandate, and signaled a willingness to consider financing schemes — including tax increases — that originally were not on his agenda.

His patient, hands-off style — reminiscent of his methodical primary campaign last year — has frustrated some anxious Democrats but stands in stark contrast to Clinton’s unsuccessful strategy of crafting a 1,300-page bill in secret and then pressing lawmakers to approve it.

Administration officials have also begun whispering a phrase used during the presidential campaign, speaking of putting the nation on a “glide path” to universal coverage rather than the insurance-for-all trumpeted by many Democrats. Though few remember, Obama never promised coverage to all 47 million uninsured Americans. A slower, phased-in attempt to cover everyone would help reduce the cost of legislation.

“A bill that gets us on a glide path is a win,” said one Democratic strategist who recently visited the White House and spoke on the condition of anonymity because he is not authorized to comment on administration strategy.

About that bold above, I’m one who does remember. However, I have also seen how Pres. Obama has moved on other aspects. But the “hands-off style” is over. It simply didn’t work.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Bill Clinton, Can’t Get No Respect

Photobucket

Can anything be more obvious?

Obama in trouble on health care for weeks, can’t explain his way out of it while stepping into “stupidly,” yet won’t reach out to, perhaps, the one man who could put it over the top. If only to get down into with the Blue Dogs. Of course, I’m talking about the great Democratic salesman, William Jefferson Clinton.

Hey, but since the Obama administration won’t use Howard Dean on health care, who is an actual doctor, no one should be surprised.

Got ego, Prez? In excess, if you ask me.

Of course, even daring to write this I can already hear the squealing from the Obama choir, emphasized by the Bill Clinton is Bad orchestra. Because, you know, William Jefferson Clinton can never be utilized by progressives or libs, even on health care after the “Hillarycare” fall. Ack! The bad memories.

Never have Democratic assets been so under utilized.

Tina Brown, thank you:

Surely it’s the former president who got it wrong once who has spent the most time and lost the most sleep thinking over how he would do it again. More important, wouldn’t Bubba do a better job than the professorial Obama at sweet-talking, arm wrestling, hugging, and head locking such obstructive Blue Dogs as Arkansas Rep. Mike Ross, who used to run a family drugstore just like the one Bill remembers from his years growing up in Hot Springs? Or North Carolina Rep. Heath Shuler, who’s one of that class of moderate Democrats Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer promised not to push around too much when Rahm persuaded them to run for a seat in the House? Obama needs to get himself dirty, and be seen to get dirty.

It looks like Obama would rather live on cheeseburgers than let Clinton get into the act on health care—or on anything else, for that matter. Maybe he thinks there’s no stage big enough for both these two Mount Rushmore megastars and never will be. Despite surface cordiality and self-restraint for Hillary’s sake, the former president’s wounds from the harsh charge of racism on the campaign, a falsehood on which Obama created his “post-racialism” campaign, remain deep, and they are not assuaged by the coolly minimal lip service a still mistrustful Obama pays to Bill’s presidential wisdom. “Sure, he calls me every few weeks,” the former president told a person I know. “But it feels as if, you know, he’s just checking a box.”

We all know what an aversion Barack Obama has to all things relating to the Big Dog. But considering he’s the best salesman we’ve got, you’ve really got to wonder. Lots of people are asking why not, including original Obama supporters.

It all gets down to Obama not wanting to have to give Bill Clinton credit. Even at the presidential level we’re seeing pettiness and spiteful professional jealousies. An attitude that permeates the Democratic layers all the way down to the grass roots, even though it was Clinton who dragged us out of the financial mess Ronald Reagan and his deregulating Republicans got us into. You’d think after the financial collapse of 2008 Obama would appreciate former Pres. Clinton a little more. Find a presidential kinship of sorts. That Bill Clinton was able to do that with George H.W. Bush, through the son president George W. Bush no less, illustrates how grown men can act when larger goals require it.

Ego is a tough master.

TM NOTE: As expected, this post generated a lot of discussion, though the downturn into male… um… endowment insults was definitely not a high point.

Read full story · Comments are closed