TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Archive | December, 2009

Best to Worst, from Decade to Year’s End

edited version cross-posted at Huffington Post

Worst decade: The Republican Party, from Karl Rove’s pronouncement of a “permanent majority” to total collapse and minority status.

Worst performance of the year: The Democratic Party, who after securing the White House and a Democratic majority have been so brazenly arrogant and politically incompetent as to have allowed a conservative comeback one year after people thought, said and wrote that conservatism was dead.

Biggest winner of 2009: Sarah Palin. No man could have bailed on his governorship to find himself in national news continually, with supporters growing daily, while orchestrating it all from a Facebook page, and putting so much fear into the DNC that they put out an oppo memo on her, even though she’s not running for anything (until 2012, that is).

Biggest winner of the decade: Hillary Clinton. There are no equals for this one. After being dragged in front of Starr’s tribunal in the 1990s, previously pronounced dead after “Hillarycare,” Mrs. Clinton became a highly approved New York senator, which she jettisoned into a presidential candidacy, landing as Secretary of State (a job she’s managed far better than she did her ’08 campaign), because even after the brutal primary battle Pres. Obama knew she was invaluable to have at his side, ending the decade with an approval rating higher than Barack Obama’s is today.

Most wonderful to watch in 2009: First Lady Michelle Obama, who has re-envisioned what it means to be first lady, from her guns to White House garden, not to mention her community service and the outreach to the DC community, amidst a whirling schedule as a mom of two wonderful girls. Mrs. Obama has exhibited pure, unadulterated class, non-pretension and female power in a way that no other first lady has done.

Biggest credibility collapse of the decade: John McCain, who began the decade as a maverick, much sought after Republican renegade, but who is now nothing more than a fading shadow of his former independence.

Disappointment of the decade: That Al Gore didn’t take the oath of office in 2001.

Biggest fall: Tiger Woods, because a cheating louse is one thing, but a sex addicted wee hours troll, while his kids grow up with an absentee dad, is inexcusable.

Highest ride of the decade: Fox News Channel. Love ‘em or hate ‘em, no one can beat ‘em.

Schmuck of the decade: John Edwards, whose story is so filled with embarrassing, mortifying and stupefyingly irresponsible elements that anyone who ever bought into his con should be unqualified to work in politics.

Biggest disappointment of 2009: Sen. Russ Feingold, for voting against mandatory coverage of pap smears and mammograms, because preventative care for women is too expensive.

Most powerful of 2009: Nancy Pelosi, who, love her or hate her, stood on a line to lead.

Biggest audience “screw you” of the decade: “The Sopranos” ending, with any number of choices possible other than the lame ass, lazy, cop out, unimaginative, ruined the whole series, won’t buy the DVDs, ending that David Chase & company delivered to the show’s devoted fans. (Preferred ending: They all land in Sicily Naples where Tony can exact revenge against Furio, unless Carmella runs away with him first.)

Most wonderful discovery of 2009: The way people in Virginia decorate their homes at Christmastime. Not with bright lights, though some do that; and not with big extras on the lawn, though a few do that too. Most simply reclaim a smidgen of colonial times by putting wreathes in every window, some adding lights, with spotlights on front doors, taking the onlooker back to when the Commonwealth of Virginia became so great.

Biggest rise of the decade: New media, those of us who exist beyond your brother’s blog, and who helped take out traditional media, with the heights that we can climb still unseen.

Most stupendous comeback after aortic valve replacement: Robin Williams, in a tour de force for HBO that will knock you out.

Best political performance of the decade: Tina Fey as Sarah Palin.

Most important news show of the decade: Jon Stewart’s “Daily Show.”

Best TV pleasures of 2009: It’s a tie: “True Blood” and “Glee,” with “Dexter” close behind. UPDATE: As Billie reminded me in the comments over @HuffPost, “Mad Men” deserves to be in this one, too (don’t know how I forgot it, as it’s one of my favorites); the JFK assassination episode alone making it remarkable.

Worst ending of 2009: The Hollywood film industry.

Most sobering realization this decade: The U.S. doesn’t make squat anymore and no one has the vision of John F. Kennedy to jump start an innovation economy, green or otherwise, to turn the sinking ship of the U.S. of A. economy around.

Walk softly and carry a big stick award of the decade: SecDef Robert Gates.

Rise of the decade: From talk radio to Senator Al Franken, a man who went on to show Democrats how power is used, while infuriating Rush Limbaugh in the process, as Franken fought to pass the rape law against private contractors, standing up for women in the military.

Suckers of the decade: National Organization of Women, and Planned Parenthood, who got beat by a guy named Bart Stupak.

Most overwrought reaction of the decade: The political left’s bellyaching about Jack Bauer and “24.”

Scariest moment of the decade: George W. Bush’s reaction when he found out we’d been hit on 9/11.

Shockers of the decade: To find myself in Washington, D.C., not to mention married! (Seriously, in 2000, I was writing and campaigning across radio airwaves for Al Gore, finishing a book and battling w/ publishers, after being hit very hard by the dot-com bomb… and was a very long way away from ever wanting to get married.)

Most cherished professional reward of 2009: The hundreds of people (and generous angels, as they say on Broadway) who donated to this site, which allowed TM.com to give a modest donation, for the very first time, to the Afghan Institute of Learning (10% of the last fundraising drive went to this org). From the bottom of my heart, thank you.

Christmastime_Blizzard_2009 024

Happiest moment of 2009: The Christmas blizzard; where a wonderland of snow transported us into an alternate universe; where neighbors became friends and no other place existed, time seemed to stop, work wasn’t so important, cocktails tasted juicier and wine fuller, difficult recipes delivered in a snap, while the fireplace burned brightly; all of which was gone in the rain that fell the day after Christmas, delivering us all in a slow slide back into reality, shifting the two feet of holiday snow and white wonder to an always accessible dream now tucked carefully away in a safe space in our minds, making us wonder if it had actually happened at all, though we knew it did, because when we shut our eyes we can still see and sense its magic.

The year is over.

The decade done.

Grab a new dream and deliver it to yourself.

Happy New Year. See you on the other side.

TM Note: The original site of my suggested “Sopranos” ending was Sicily. A million mea culpas, because of course the Sopranos hail from Naples, as I was reminded by David Chase, the creator of the series, in a letter that accompanied the full DVD set of the show, in the classiest “up yours” I’ve ever received from anyone. But set my suggested ending in Naples and you’ve got something.

Read full story · Comments { 32 }

Senate Health Care Bill Unites Left and Right

–updated–


Compliments of Ed Morissey of Hot Air

Thought you might like to see my appearance with Matt Lewis on MSNBC earlier this week.

Ed might want to rethink this line: There are more death panels in ObamaCare than there are monopolies in health insurance.

Also, I’m not against health care reform, what Ed calls “Obamacare,” but what Dems have crafted so far doesn’t cut it.

He also takes issue with my use of the word monopoly, though it’s a small quibble. Insurance companies competing for MANDATED customers, when there isn’t an outsider involved that offers competition, because after all the insurance industry agrees on the rates they will offer, is monopolizing a system while Democrats are throwing people into it, because if they refuse the IRS will fine them.

And since I’ve got this video up, I’m looking for someone to capture my media appearances when they happen, as the person I used before isn’t available any longer. Contact me if you’re interested.

Read full story · Comments { 21 }

White House Rails Against Washington Blame Game

…then plays it themselves. From the White House:

…Unfortunately too many are engaged in the typical Washington game of pointing fingers and making political hay, instead of working together to find solutions to make our country safer.

First, it’s important that the substantive context be clear: for seven years after 9/11, while our national security was overwhelmingly focused on Iraq – a country that had no al Qaeda presence before our invasion – Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda’s leadership was able to set up camp in the border region of Pakistan and Afghanistan, where they continued to plot attacks against the United States. Meanwhile, al Qaeda also regenerated in places like Yemen and Somalia, establishing new safe-havens that have grown over a period of years. It was President Obama who finally implemented a strategy of winding down the war in Iraq, and actually focusing our resources on the war against al Qaeda – more than doubling our troops in Afghanistan, and building partnerships to target al Qaeda’s safe-havens in Yemen and Somalia. And in less than one year, we have already seen many al Qaeda leaders taken out, our alliances strengthened, and the pressure on al Qaeda increased worldwide. …

A little long winded and in desperate need of a sound bite. Try something like this instead: The last administration had eight years to solve our security problems, but instead they actually made them worse.

Pres. Obama is already ahead of Bush-Cheney. Just nine months into Bush’s presidency, after ignoring warnings from William Jefferson Clinton, then demoting Richard Clarke, we were hit on 9/11. That’s all that needs to be said.

Read full story · Comments { 6 }

If You Know It’s Coming Prepare

“[W]e are at war and when President Obama pretends we aren’t, it makes us less safe,” Cheney said in a statement to POLITICO. “Why doesn’t he want to admit we’re at war? It doesn’t fit with the view of the world he brought with him to the Oval Office. It doesn’t fit with what seems to be the goal of his presidency — social transformation — the restructuring of American society.” – Politico

artofwar

Democrats know by now Republicans will always jump on any national security opening to Jimmy Carter a new president. Trying to camouflage a near catastrophe is a fool’s errand, which sets your adversaries up for a freebie.

There is a scene in the Tom Clancy action movie “Clear and Present Danger” when a senior aide to the president tells him that he should deny a disastrous personal connection with someone who has been revealed as a money launderer for drug dealers, once the press asks him about it. Ryan starts to agree, but then catches himself, saying that the president should not only admit the tie to his disgraced friend, but go further to say he’s known him all of his life and in fact they’ve been lifelong friends. “Give them no place to go, nothing to report, no story.”

Lesson number one in political damage control.

You’ve really got to wonder who concocted the talking point for Janet Napolitano and decided the Administration’s opening line after the failed terrorist attack on Christmas. Whoever it is should be fired, but it may come down to Napolitano falling on her sword because Pres. Obama is lost inside his presidency.

It doesn’t have to be this way, because Barack Obama is one of the most gifted politicians we’ve seen in modern times. Whether he feels the impact of policies or not, which there is no evidence he does, few are able to craft the type of soaring rhetoric that Pres. Obama can. He’s also got instincts on the right policies to follow and implement. Unfortunately, he’s so far lacking the one crucial characteristic that separates great presidencies from the ordinary.

Pres. Obama doesn’t seem to be able to stand on a line and lead, letting his instincts be the primary guide of his presidency. Once again we find a president unable to be honest and blunt with the people.

Though we’ve come a long way since 9/11, we are still well beyond what we need to do to secure airplanes properly, which is the primary issue after this latest event. The Administration’s inability to come forward to say just that shows a timidity to face facts and deal with them openly, instead trying to first cover a mistake, then fix it by having the President do clean up. By that time it’s too late.

You can send an underling out with talking points, but they better not defy credulity or the heat is going to turn into an inferno, which is just what happened. Finally smoking Pres. Obama out of his Hawaii vacation, even though he was right to not jump on the story when it was reported. Unfortunately, the decision to walk down the “the system worked” road scuttled his This Does Not Rise To Presidential Response Level, forcing him to make not one but two statements after the event had blown up in the Adminstration’s face. Ms. Napolitano had the stature to handle this, but unfortunately she didn’t have the Jack Ryan stuff to tell the President that the only way to deal with this event was by heading right into it: The system didn’t work; there is no way this man should have been on the flight; if his father thinks he’s an extremist we should too and handle him accordingly. We didn’t and that’s a problem we’re going to fix.

I still believe Barack Obama has the potential to be an extraordinary president. But it’s going to take a lot more than getting two people with differing opinions in the room and cutting the difference between them to find your own. Or reacting to a serious national security incident forgetting that the American people are still a Jack Bauer loving, gun toting, hero worshiping, kick your ass culture. I know liberals don’t like that reality, but it’s the one we live in so there’s no excuse for not being prepared.

Read full story · Comments { 74 }

Anne E. Kornblut, Women for President, and Her Unending Clinton Smears Turned Around for Cash

bumped

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton appeared on all five talk shows yesterday morning and demonstrated a particularly senatorial skill: the art of the filibuster. … [...] Above all, though, in a morning of appearances that yielded virtually no news, Clinton illustrated her ability to talk. And talk. And talk. – Anne Kornblut, “Hitting All the Sunday Talk Shows, Clinton Says a Lot but Reveals Little”

palin_clinton

Anne E. Kornblut has a book coming out. She’s giving advice on how a woman can crack that final “highest, hardest” glass ceiling. No, it’s not a comic book, but it should be.

Ladies and gentlemen, exhibit A from Ms. Kornblut is the quote at the top, which proves she’s actually got no interest whatsoever in outlining what it will take to get a female president. That she believes it’s unique for a politician “to talk. And talk. And talk” renders her analysis worthless. Males have been doing it for two centuries in America, but when Hillary Clinton does it it’s “the filibuster.” But none of this means that the Kornbluts of Traditional Media haven’t been influential.

Hillary Rodham Clinton is now in, very in, so capitalizing on all things Hillary, while not forgetting the latest political phenom, Sarah Palin, has to pay, right?

Now, I’ve got no beef with anyone making a buck. But Ms. Kornblut deserves scrutiny on this one, if for no other reason than the sheer gall of her to rewrite her own roll in this drama.

Ms. Kornblut beginning her book campaign this past Sunday in “How to shatter the ‘highest, hardest’ glass ceiling”. A more fitting and truthful title would read: “How to shatter a woman’s reputation as she reaches for the ‘highest, hardest’ glass ceiling, a traditional media guide.” An excerpt from Sunday:

That other milestone still beckons though. Women are running for some of the most critical seats this year, in Massachusetts, California, Texas, Florida and elsewhere. Despite “lipstick on a pig,” “beat the bitch,” and “iron my shirt,” the 2008 election wasn’t just a collection of lowlights for female candidates. It was a chance for the country and for women running for high office to learn what it will take for a woman to someday assume the Oval Office.

As a political reporter, I spent more than two and a half years covering the Clinton campaign, and traveled with Palin after her nomination. Here are some lessons, culled from what I witnessed on the campaign trail, for the next female candidate who’s aiming to break what Clinton called “the highest, hardest glass ceiling of all.”

Kornblut’s analysis of what went wrong in the Clinton primary campaign missing the mark by a mile, but something I have no intention or interest in re-arguing (someone else will have to write that book). But on she drones with her advice for how to break that final glass ceiling.

Don’t take women — especially young women — for granted.

Shorter Kornblut: Men won’t help elect a woman. Kornblut ignorant to the fact that the young women demographic has been the most sought after vote in the last two decades.

Prepare your family.

As if your family can mitigate the traditional media’s swipes, including those by Ms. Kornblut.

Expect them to hate you because you’re beautiful.

What, did she copy this out of the Miss America Pageant guide book?

Speak softly and carry a big statistic.

Shorter Kornblut: Resumes matter, except when they don’t. Someone should point out to Ms. Kornblut, who ignorantly equates Palin’s “lipstick on a pig” with the salvos thrown at Clinton, “beat the bitch,” and “iron my shirt,” that these are not equivalent. Palin’s lipstick-pig comment from her own repertoire and mouth, while the others were either thrown at Clinton by a female supporter of her male opponent, John McCain, and a stunt by male’s standing up against everything Hillary represented. Not quite the same, but Kornblut isn’t concerned.

Beat breast cancer? You may beat your opponent. … But if history is any guide, the public may hold her in higher regard for having beaten back the disease.

Unbelievable. Shorter Kornblut: Play the victim, it works. I assure you that Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz isn’t where she is today because she beat breast cancer, though there’s no doubt women have to juggle toughness with tenderness or be called “shrill,” a description used continually against Clinton.

Seize the moral high ground.

Shorter Kornblut from her own mouth: “Voters instinctively view women as more honest, a trait they can use when running against men.”

I know. Stunning stuff.

With advice this sage at the ready, maybe I should run.

When Secretary Clinton traveled to the Congo this past year, Jake Tapper asked Kornblut this question: as somebody who is writing a book about women and politics, what was that eruption in the Congo when she thought — was so offended somebody would ask her about her husband’s view on whether or not the Chinese should loan the Congo some money?

KORNBLUT: Well, and, in fact, I think we’ve reported out that there was no mistranslation, that she was asked about her husband. The reporters who were there said it was very hot. She was very tired, so maybe her demeanor is not the one she would have wanted, but that the underling sentiment, that she’s the secretary of state, is one that she intended to convey, especially in a region of the world that is so male-dominated.

But these incidents are kind of bigger than that. It’s sort of the perfect encapsulation of the burden of being Hillary Clinton, that you are seen in relation to your husband wherever you go, not just by the media, but by the world, and asked questions about him.

And it reminded me a lot of the campaign, when she was seen in relation to him and having to respond and trying to be her own person. But it also raises the question of what kind of secretary of state she’s going to be and if she’s going to be able to harness the celebrity, which, of course, is the reason we’re all talking about it, you know, to a larger purpose.

Some people, when this whole incident happened, said to me, “You know, she looks kind of like a first lady on this trip. She’s out there. She’s been gone 11 days, 7 countries. She’s away from the center of action here.”

Kornblut ignores the fact that she participated fully in the relation to her husband melodrama. Will she address that in her book? Obviously, self-reflection isn’t her strong suit.

Next we get the “some people” source, as Anne pontificates that Clinton really should take “some shorter trips,” because, after all, she won’t “get as tired when she’s on the road” if she’s reined in:

So I suspect we may see some shorter trips from her, ones where she’s not going to get as tired when she’s on the road. But at the end of the day, I think her — again, the underlining sentiment, is one that certainly the White House and she defend, that she had the right to say that.

Well, at least Clinton is perceived as having a “right to say” what she did, after all, free speech is given to even women in politics. Anne says so.

But as HuffPost’s Jason Linkins pointed out last summer, Ms. Kornblut can change with the wind about Clinton, if it suits her purpose, which since she’s writing a book USING Clinton for cash, you can certainly bet she will.

MITCHELL: And we have to say, for all of the talk of Bill versus Hillary and all of that, we shouldn’t lose sight of what she did. She really has elevated as Mary Beth Sheridan wrote in the Washington Post today, really has elevated the whole aspect of women. I talked to Richard Engel about the women in Afghanistan, but women around the world is very much a part of Hillary Clinton’s diplomatic mission.

KORNBLUT: Yeah, absolutely, and has been in her life for a long time. Going back to the famous speech she gave in 1995 in Beijing when she was First Lady and she said women’s rights are human rights and vice versa. She has been an international celebrity. And even though there have been two previous female Secretaries of State, she’s elevated that role, she’s given women around the world someone that they’re familiar with to look to and this trip to Africa, that was a great deal of her focus and has been at the State Department since she’s been there.

Mind you, Kornblut’s casual flip on Clinton isn’t part of a partisan fight, as has historically happened throughout U.S. campaign history against competing candidates of the same party, which inevitably ends in a kiss and make up hand shake, including from the camps involved. This is a so called journalist who is supposed to have a clear and consistent eye through her analysis.

It’s the Richard Wolfe syndrome, access for cash, though at least Wolffe was always a kiss ass for Obama, deserving of, at the very least, points for consistency.

Anne E. Kornblut, who has made a career out of sliming Hillary Rodham Clinton, does not. She’ll never examine her own hypocrisy and lack of integrity for even thinking she could write a book about women in politics seeking the highest office without investigating her own culpability in crafting a cartoon image of Hillary Rodham Clinton, who despite the likes of Ms. Kornblut actually made it one step away from the top, now holding a job making her one of the most powerful women of world influence.

If Sarah Palin takes a turn, you can be sure that the Kornbluts of Traditional Media will be at work again, going beyond issues to the personal, only this time they will likely be joined by the AndrewSullivans of New Media.

A female U.S. president is an idea whose time has come, and a lot of that is due to the hard road Hillary Clinton traveled, which ended in the prize she was awarded by Pres. Obama, which in spite of the Kornbluts of Traditional Media, was part of her historic journey that made the sky above the cracks visible for the first time.

Shove the advice.

Read full story · Comments { 16 }

Napolitano Gets Company

I’m scheduled to be on MSNBC around 3:30 pm eastern, talking about the latest health care battles, which today includes this blockbuster slam on Democrats from none other than Bob Herbert. It’s a must read.

The bill that passed the Senate with such fanfare on Christmas Eve would impose a confiscatory 40 percent excise tax on so-called Cadillac health plans, which are popularly viewed as over-the-top plans held only by the very wealthy. In fact, it’s a tax that in a few years will hammer millions of middle-class policyholders, forcing them to scale back their access to medical care.

Which is exactly what the tax is designed to do.

Now, Sen. Jim Demint, come on down…

szep_janet

Demint proves what I said in my post over at HuffPost. Whether it’s Democrats or Republicans, our government hasn’t a clue. Can’t wait to hear their newest knee jerk rules to be set in place to combat the threat of loaded underwear.

On another terror angle, a judge has slammed Obama as well as the State department on an alleged Palestinian terrorist attack from 2000.

“The Executive Branch of the United States has been particularly unhelpful in resolving this difficult Motion,” Kessler wrote. “The Court requested that the State Department file a Statement of Interest in order to understand the international ramifications of any order it might enter, and to be apprised of our Government’s position about such ramifications. In this case, as in Knox v. The Palestinian Liberation Organization… the State Department declined to do so. Instead it filed the identical mealy-mouthed Notice there as it did in this case. That Notice, for all practical purposes, said nothing and certainly provided no substantive guidance whatsoever to the Court regarding the Government’s position or concerns about any impact a decision might have on the delicate situation in the Middle East.”

Back to Mr. Demint:

An attempt to blow up a trans-Atlantic flight from Amsterdam to Detroit on Christmas Day would be all-consuming for the administrator of the Transportation Security Administration — if there were one. The post remains vacant because Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., has held up President Barack Obama’s nominee in opposition to the prospect of TSA workers joining a labor union. … – McClatchy

Demint slogan for 2012: Better to be dead than union. But will tea party activists buy it?

The floor is yours.

Read full story · Comments { 29 }

Napolitano Eats Her Words

late update below

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Like this wasn’t predictable.

As predictable as this opening paragraph in the Wall Street Journal.

A U.S. government that has barred the phrase “war on terror” has nonetheless acknowledged that a failed Christmas day bomb attack on an airliner was a terrorist attempt. Can we all now drop the pretense that we stopped fighting a war once Dick Cheney and George W. Bush left the White House?

The instant I heard Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano utter the words, “the system worked,” I’ve waited for the ass covering that was bound to come. Today it arrived.

When you’re talking about “context,” you’re screwed. Why don’t smart people ever learn that lesson? Easy. They think we’re stupid.

The statement Napolitano made on Sunday was not only ridiculously absurd counter-intuitive, but something any civilian, even one not usually following national security and terrorism threats, could deduce was utter crap.


Obama’s first statement, as he fumbles a bit
when talking about Abdulmutallab, but
delivers strong statement on Iran violence.

Let’s see, a young Nigerian male, whose flight originated out of Lagos airport on the continent of Africa, a notoriously iffy security proposition to begin with, reportedly buys a one-way ticket (LATE UPDATE: the reports turned out to be false, by the way), paying in cash, with his father (chairman of Nigeria’s FirstBank, the oldest bank in the country, with offices in London, Paris and Beijing), notifying the U.S. embassy in Nigeria that his son has been radicalized, warning the U.S., with the young man attempting a terrorist attack that was foiled by sheer sweet luck, but “the system worked.”

Excuse me if I’m a bit queasy over this whole incident, but folks, our government is incompetent and it doesn’t matter whether Republicans or Democrats are in charge, even as the latter circle the wagons. This many years after 9/11 and we still can’t get it down that someone on a terrorist watch list should have extra screening?

And how dare I suggest that behavioral profiling might be something we should adopt! How wingnuttery of me to be so cool headed as to ponder the notion that some of what Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab exhibited might have been a flaming red flag.

For all the blathering about national security, we’re not very serious in this country about actually providing it. Even as I support Pres. Obama’s mission in Afghanistan, even if he won’t say it’s humanitarian when it is, the people against it have a good case to make when our own national security still appears like a sieve.

It would take tens of millions of dollars to secure every airport, including surveillance on baggage handlers. However, international flights or connecting flights could possibly be a first start.

But in this juvenile nation, a place where we secure our safety in fits and starts and only in the aftermath of a threat, our eyes are continually turned beyond our borders to the world. Changing the world by policing it, something we still do well (war and weaponry actually the only thing we still produce and can sell), while we crumble at home.

As for our own soil, using the term of the day, let’s be honest, the pure luck reality that we haven’t been hit again looks like it will be the case until it runs out, which it will eventually. (God help the poor sad sod of a politician and political party that happens to be at the helm when hell comes visiting again, because the foreshadowing is already 9 years long.)

But maybe I’m not being fair. After all, you can’t expect mere humans to be able to handle this gargantuan task. There is just too much information out there.

“It’s got to be something that causes the information to sort of rise out of the noise level, because there is just so much out there,” one intelligence official said.

Isn’t this what we heard from Bush-Cheney after 9/11? You know, after tales of CIA director George Tenet’s “hair on fire” warnings during the summer of 2001, when that now famous PDB was read by George W. Bush on vacation, not spurring any action at all. Revealing that Rep. King’s outlandish pronouncements that the latest near catastrophe in midair is why we need Gitmo and interrogations, even if those never helped George W. Bush avert Richard Reid just months after 9/11 happened on Bush’s watch; even as Mary Matalin spins the fantasy that 9/11 was what Bush inherited from Clinton.

The U.S. can’t possibly stop terrorism attempts because we can’t tell what’s real and what’s not, because the flood of information is just too much. Mr. Yglesias takes a big swallow of this nonsense, questioning whether more information is really a good thing. Yeah, because stupid is the thing. Democrats sounding like a silly Republican trying to spin this one.

Bluntly, this latest terrorism attempt reveals our governmental incompetence inaction.

Then again, maybe the problem is us.

TM.com Reader and commenter “Marie205″
27 December 2009 at 1:53 pm

I hate to say this but “You can have all the security in the world to stop terrorist like this guy, and in the end one of his terrorist friends will make it through” I know that might sound crude to some people. I was in London during the train bombings a couple years back, it was my very first trip over seas and I remember being terrified the day the bombs took place. However, when I looked around at the face coming up out of the damaged subways and on the streets I noticed a difference culturally with the English and Americans. The folks I was around that day didn’t become hysterical at all they were upset but kept there cool. There media didn’t go overboard about the London bombings and everyone around me handled it with an adult manner. Once I made it back to the State, American media was is in overdrive as if our country would be under attack soon. People around me here was walking around afraid of there own shadows, it was pathetic to witness. Here I was returning from almost losing my life in the London train bombings renewed with the strength I got from English men and Women, who refuse to be afraid or let the terrorist ruin their lives to my home country of frighten children. I really do believe Americans have a lot of growing up do we seem to think of ourselves as if bad things are never suppose to happen to us. After we suffer from the best nation on earth attitude; but were not just like other countries we will be attacked.

The “Department of Homeland Security” is a joke, a waste of money we don’t have, a redundant department of massive irrelevance, not to mention a public relations nightmare, as Mr. Tom Ridge, followed by Ms. Napolitano, have both conclusively proved, with duties that could be performed by another agency or better yet, shared.

Anyone laughing?

Read full story · Comments { 41 }

Mousavi’s Nephew, the New Neda

updated

And his body has reportedly disappeared, with assassination looking more and more likely.

According to the report, it is possible that the government is behind the disappearance, as an attempt to stop the family from holding a mass funeral. – Tehran: Body of opposition leader’s nephew disappears from hospital.

Ayatollah Ali Khameni is up against it, with yesterday’s Ashura finale, coming on the 7th day after Montazeri’s death, adding to the sights we saw on YouTube and heard through web reports. Now another moment sits on the horizon for more confrontations. The 7th day commemoration of Seyed Ali Habibi Mousavi Khameneh, the nephew of Mir Hossein Mousavi, who was killed by Iranian police yesterday, as symbolic a murder as the momentous killing of Neda last summer. Offering another moment for Iranians to react and rebel against a government that has lost its grip.

These building forces foreshadow a distinct possibility, if the world and the U.S. handles the situation carefully. That Ayatollah Ali Khameni could indeed fall through the people’s push, even if it will be a long, drawn out play the proceeds it.

Steve Clemons offers a quick and to the point take of this moment in time:

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has become the new Shah — hated by so many within the country that it seems implausible that Iranian elites will ever be able to operate without much distrust and fear of each other.

The United States needs to be very cautious — and not do anything on the ground in Iran that would allow the incumbent government to to evade “the death to the dictator” chants directed at it by distracting the country with evidence of credible external interventions.

… But as Iran expert Barbara Slavin just wrote to me, things don’t look good for Khamenei and his government. She wrote to me via Facebook: “[Khamenei] is stuck. If he begins to compromise, he’s lost — and if he doesn’t, he’s lost.”

Read full story · Comments { 8 }

Not My Uncle Dick’s Military

As regulars know, my uncle Dick flew missions in WWII, ending up with what they called “battle fatigue.” A lot has changed since the old days of the mid-20th century military joined the world to fight. Some of it not good.

Whether it’s in Iraq or Afghanistan, the multiple deployments that began under Bush-Cheney has stressed our military to its seams. But that’s not the only thing going on inside our armed forces. Sexual assault is a concern that’s been around for years and even as only 10% are reported, the rise in women standing up in the last couple of years is a good sign. It’s hard to compare sexual assault with an IED explosive that just blew US soldiers to smithereens, but the lasting impact is deadly, especially in the armed forces where every soldier is needed.

It’s not just something women have to face either, even if they are the majority silent sufferers. From the New York Times:

“A woman in the military is more likely to be raped by a fellow soldier than killed by enemy fire in Iraq,” Representative Jane Harman, a Democrat from California, said at a Congressional hearing this year, repeating an assertion she has made a refrain in a campaign of hers to force the military to do more to address abuses.

At least 10 percent of the victims in the last year were men, a reality that the Pentagon’s task force said the armed services had done practically nothing to address in terms of counseling, treatment and prosecution. Men are considered even less likely to report attacks, officials said, because of the stigma, and fears that their own sexual orientation would be questioned. In the majority of the reported cases, the attacker was male.

DADT is not helping. Further stigmatizing a group of soldiers by demanding they stay silent about their very nature spurs on a sexual assault atmosphere. The sooner DADT is repealed the sooner the military can begin dealing with this reality, which may be more difficult to grapple with than women’s rising roles in the military.

But the military doesn’t change quickly, with the career, top brass likely the hardest to move. That’s why people and veterans groups need to start talking about the issue of sexual assault openly, which the media must help highlight and de-stigmatize the importance of reporting the incidences, even as the wingnuts rally ’round the abusers, saying it’s only a small few, which is hardly the point.

This issue gets to the foundational code of honor our soldiers must uphold, but also the juvenile patriarchy and frat boy mentality that is embedded in our armed forces, but must be continually confronted, with the media’s willingness to make this a topic of discussion so that silence can be exchanged for transparency.

Read full story · Comments { 3 }

Britain Reportedly Denied Abdulmatallab Entry

bumped

What happened between the reports to the U.S. embassy in Nigeria from Abdulmatallab’s own father, Umaru Mutallab, a Nigerian banker, and the decision to put the young Nigerian on a watch list, but not on the no-fly list? The WSJ is reporting that State shared the information with U.S. intelligence and counterterrorism bureaus. Where it went after that and who made the decisions following are worth investigating. Why did Britain reportedly understand the dangers but we didn’t?

Jake Tapper is reporting that Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said on “This Week” that after the failed terrorism attempt things worked “like clockwork,” but “she wasn’t so sure about how well the government performed before the incident.” Gibbs was his usual glib self, talking about make sure there was “no clog in the bureaucratic plumbing.”

The Washington Post writes today that one anonymous Administration source said there was “insufficient derogatory information available” about Abdulmatallab to include him in anything beyond a database for terrorism related individuals. I’d like to know what is sufficient if someone’s own father, a significant individual in Nigeria, thinks his son might be a danger to the U.S.

At first glance, with facts still rolling in, this looks dangerously like sloppy gate keeping, the same we saw under Bush-Cheney.

I’d sure like to see the surveillance tapes to see what type of behavior Abdulmatallab was exhibiting before he got on the plane. It’s impolitic to say, but I also wonder when countries, including our own, are going to quit making everyone go through histrionics like being basically tied to your airline seat one hour before landing, which is absurd, and instead do some simple profiling of behavior, perhaps taking Israel’s El Al’s lead, as was talked about after 9/11.

During the interrogation, ticket holders are also psychologically evaluated. Their entire makeup is judged by tone of voice, mood and body language. The information is sent by computer to international law enforcement agencies, such as Interpol or Scotland Yard, for instant evaluation.

A discussion about profiling in the U.S. invariably begins and ends with race, completely ignoring behavior. Instead, airlines and countries across the globe shrug off psychological tells that could reveal something is very wrong. When used with the other traditional methods of discovering bombs, etc., we’d have another layer of security in place.

But this long after 9/11, the U.S. in particular, including obviously the airlines, just don’t take safety seriously.

More from the Washington Post article today:

Administration officials acknowledged Saturday that Abdulmutallab’s name was added in November to the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment, or TIDE, which contains about 550,000 individuals and is maintained by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence at the National Counterterrorism Center. TIDE is a catch-all list into which all terrorist-related information is sent.

Some, but not all, information from TIDE is transferred to the FBI-maintained Terrorist Screening Data Base (TSDB), from which consular, border and airline watch lists are drawn. The Transportation Security Administration has a “no-fly” list of about 4,000 people who are prohibited from boarding any domestic or U.S.-bound aircraft. A separate list of about 14,000 “selectees” require additional scrutiny but are not banned from flying.

Abdulmutallab’s name never made it past the TIDE database. “A TIDE record on Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was created in November 2009,” one administration official said, but “there was insufficient information available on the subject at that time to include him in the TSDB or its ‘no fly’ or ‘selectee’ lists.”

There is another report about how the Iraq and Afghanistan wars had radicalized the young Nigerian, giving more ammunition for the case that U.S. involvement in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have caused serious blow back: His father said he became radicalized after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in New York and on the Pentagon, and by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

But the real tell in this story so far is that unlike the U.S., who only had Abdulmatallab in the terrorist database but didn’t go any further, the UK Times is reporting that Britain had already taken action against the young Nigerian:

The son of a prominent Nigerian banker, who allegedly attempted to blow up a transatlantic flight over America, was barred from returning to Britain earlier this year.

Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, 23, graduated from a university in London last year but his visa request was refused in May when he attempted to apply for a new course at a bogus college.

… [...] He attempted to return to Britain for a six-month course in May this year but was refused by officials from the UK Border Agency.

“He was refused entry on grounds that he was applying to study at an educational establishment that we didn’t consider to be genuine,” a Whitehall official said.

Neither the Washington Post, nor the WSJ, among others, has any reporting about Britain denying Abdulmutallab’s entry in May 2009.

Now, it’s all eyes on Lagos airport, with rising concern over security out of Africa.

Read full story · Comments { 15 }

Mousavi’s Nephew Reported Killed Amidst Iran Violence

–video update in comments–

There are reports that Mousavi’s nephew, Seyyed Ali Mousavi was shot and killed today. There are even unconfirmed reports pouring in of people heading toward Sina Hospital, where it is assumed Ali Mousavi’s body is. – Iran News Now

At the climax of Ashura, violence in Iran explodes.

From the BBC:

Opposition sources in Iran say that at least four protesters have been shot dead in violent clashes between anti-government crowds and police in Tehran.

The nephew of former presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi was among the dead, the BBC has confirmed.

Security forces reportedly opened fire on protesters. Police have denied there were any fatalities.

All of this coincides with Grand Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri’s recent death, which adds another volatile element to the mix today, which would be the 7th day since his death, the traditional time memorials are held. The Iranian’s Supreme National Security Council forbade any meetings to commemorate Montazeri’s death, except in Qom and Najafabad.

Read full story · Comments { 9 }

A Plane, Terrorism, and Chemicals

“I took him in a choke to the first class and all the people were like, ‘What’s going on?!” – New York Post

The plan Abdul Farouk Abdulmutallab had to take down an airplane failed.

That doesn’t mean the intended terrorism was unsuccessful, especially if we follow Rep. Pet Hoekstra’s lead. Classic tweet by Pete. Though I have no idea why anyone even cares what Mr. Hoekstra has to say, as giving him all this attention is just silly, not to mention exactly what Hoekstra wanted.

The fear inside the plane was no doubt real. But the failure of Abdulmutallab to have the desired end he wanted is just that, a failure.

However, there is a pertinent question that reveals another failure.

The authorities are closely examining how Mr. Abdulmutallab was able to bring on board the powder and syringe full of chemicals.

Yeah, what about that?

Read full story · Comments { 52 }

A Merry White Christmas from Washington

Merry Christmas.

It’s been an extra special season for me and Mark, our first in Washington, D.C., with the white Christmas a kid’s continuing dream for me, no matter the years that pass.

It’s interesting how neighbors become friends in the middle of a blizzard, when all anyone can do is walk through it, perhaps even discovering their inner child again…

Blessings to our Armed Forces across the globe, whose presence in the world, no matter where they are stationed, represent a mission of better things to come for each country in which they serve. We never forget your sacrifice or that of your family.

I’d also like to say a word about the recent policy of Maj. Gen. Anthony Cucolo, which stated that any female soldier who gets pregnant would be punished (not included rape victims), to include the male involved as well. Diane Sawyer, in her new gig as ABC evening news anchor, covered this story, while also proving that so far her debut is totally un-KatieCouric like (though she has improved). Anyway, Cucolo’s policy created a firestorm, with the general now stating he would never court-martial someone for pregnancy, but was driving home the importance of his female soldiers, whom he stated are some of his best. Unlike the National Organization of Whining (er….sorry about that, after all it is Christmas) Women, as well as some female politicians who are against it, I fully support Cucolo’s policy, which only applies to soldiers under his command in Iraq. In fact, I think it should be U.S. Armed Forces policy. Women sign up for the job. They need to do their duty. So, Hu-raah!, sir. Making women responsible, along with men, for the charge they’ve sworn to keep erases a line. Now, that’s equality.

Enjoy the holiday to its fullest!

Wishing all of you great joy and a very Merry Christmas.

Red Cross Salutes Our Troops.

Red Cross Salutes Our Troops.

Mount Vernon during the Christmas blizzard of '09.

Mount Vernon during the Christmas blizzard of '09.

The Historic Willard Hotel

The Historic Willard Hotel

Treasury Dept. at Christmastime

Treasury Dept. at Christmastime

White House, Washington Monument in distance.

White House, Washington Monument in distance.

Consider this a holiday free for all. Any topic goes. …and don’t forget you can post a diary In the News too, as well as send me thoughts about what’s on your mind as the year ends. I read them all.

And one more time with feeling, Merry Christmas.

Read full story · Comments { 37 }

HISTORY MADE as SENATE DEMS PASS HEALTH CARE BILL

updated below – bumped from 7:22 a.m.

… For all the historic force of the vote — Ted Kennedy’s widow, Vicki Kennedy, was in the chamber, as was the elderly John Dingell Jr., whose father introduced the first national health-care plan into the Congress almost a century ago — it has become difficult to write these milestone posts. Health-care reform, by this point, has had a lot of milestones. It has cleared five committees. It has come through the House of Representatives. It has been merged into a single bill in the Senate. It has passed through the Senate. No previous health-care reform bill has come anywhere near this far. But there are more milestones left to achieve: The House and Senate need to agree on a bill. That bill has to pass both chambers again. And then the president has to sign the legislation. Passing legislation, it turns out, is a long and ugly process. God, is it ugly. … Bad a system as it might be, it’s the only one we’ve got, at least for now. This is what victory looks like. … – Ezra Klein, Winning ugly, but winning.

Love it or hate it, it is historic, Vice Pres. Biden presiding.

In a humorous moment, when Sen. Reid was called to vote he mistakenly said “no,” but then was allowed to change his vote, with laughter breaking out, as he threw his hands up to say “AYE!” That moment is at about 1 minute into the video shown here.

Can you just imagine what the traditional media would have done if the Senate had failed? Republicans would be dancing.

Now Pres. Obama says he’ll get involved.

MR. LEHRER: Are you going to be involved in the reconciliation?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Absolutely.

MR. LEHRER: I mean, on a hands-on way?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Absolutely.

MR. LEHRER: Are you going to actually participate with -

PRESIDENT OBAMA: We are – we are – we hope to have a whole bunch of folks over here in the West Wing, and I’ll be rolling up my sleeves and spending some time before the full Congress even gets into session, because the American people need it now.

Pres. Obama to “roll up his sleeves.” Swell.

Let me add a thought about where we stand and the mess this debacle has left in its wake, regardless of the history made, which is a fact and not in doubt. Driving to a goal is not the same as truly inspired leadership, which we have not seen yet on health care.

…highly motivated people have a kind of ego determination driving them over obstacles and towards goals–nothing gets in their way. Now, most of us have been taught that this is an admirable trait… If motivation is grabbing an idea and carrying it through to an acceptable conclusion, then inspiration is the reverse. When we’re in the grip of inspiration, an idea has taken hold of us… where we allow ourselves to be moved by a force that’s more powerful than our ego and all of its illusions, is inspiration. … – Dr. Wayne Dyer, from Inspiration, Your Ultimate Calling

So far, Mr. Obama has taken ideas from others, including opposing views, then cut a deal in the middle, nothing further driving him but getting it done, as Ted Kennedy would say. But the difference between Obama and the late Lion of the Senate is that Kennedy was truly inspired by the cause of universal health care and fought for it openly, putting everything he had on the line to get it passed, even at a time when he was dying. So, whatever compromises he might have made would not have come from his ego, but in order to continue progress, with there little doubt in my mind he would have never voted against a health care in the Senate; though had he lived it wouldn’t have looked like this one.

Obama’s yet to be illustrate any inspired leadership. If he had truly fought on principles, publicly and fiercely to the bitter end, which he did not do, instead offering nonsense that he never campaigned for a public option, maybe we could have forgiven his compromises. But he didn’t, so I don’t.

Read full story · Comments { 41 }

Air Strike Against Extremist Cleric Tied to Fort Hood Massacre Kills 30

by Gene Thorpe, Washington Post

by Gene Thorpe, Washington Post

A Christmas Eve air strike has reportedly killed 30 militants in Yemen. An anonymous official said Al Qaeda were meeting at the house of Anwar al-Awlaki, the preacher who exchanged emails with Fort Hood suspect Maj Nidal Hasan, that was struck. From Reuters:

Nasser al-Wahayshi, the Yemeni leader of Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), and his Saudi deputy, Saeed al-Shehri, were believed to be among 30 militants killed in the dawn operation in the eastern province of Shabwa, said the official, who asked not to be identified.

U.S.-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki may also have died in the air strike which targeted a meeting of militants planning attacks on Yemeni and foreign oil and economic targets, he said.

If all the deaths are confirmed, the air strike would appear to have struck a severe blow against AQAP, seen as the most dangerous regional offshoot of Osama bin Laden’s network.

Interesting interview on Obama’s shifting Yemeni strategy gives details behind recent military strikes in that country, which takes our aiding Yemeni leaders with anti-terrorism support through military equipment to another level.

Read full story · Comments { 29 }

Health Care in February?

Obama has been told that disputes over abortion and the tight schedule are highly likely to delay a final deal, a blow to the president, who had hoped to trumpet a health care victory in his big speech to the nation. But he has also been told that House Democratic leaders seem inclined, at least for now, to largely accept the compromise worked out in the Senate, virtually ensuring he will eventually get a deal. – Politico

Wait a minute. The House comes back Jan. 12, then goes on some retreat, with the Senate back Jan. 18. So, if House leaders are “inclined” to give a nod to the Senate bill, why can’t Obama delay the SOTU until the first of February and announce it then?

If what Politico reports is correct, that health care legislation could be delayed until February, after the State of the Union, this is simply managerial incompetence. If they’re so inept to not be able to push this bill through before Obama’s SOTU, then who knows what could happen. Someone’s playing with fire here, because nobody is going to let up on this one and the Christmas mood will not last.

Not having health care legislation, after all this holiday drama, to trumpet at the SOTU would be leadership malpractice.

Rep. Slaughter speaks out to say no to the Senate bill.

Supporters of the weak Senate bill say “just pass it — any bill is better than no bill.”

I strongly disagree — a conference report is unlikely to sufficiently bridge the gap between these two very different bills.

It’s time that we draw the line on this weak bill and ask the Senate to go back to the drawing board. The American people deserve at least that.

But get this, according to Greg Sargent, she nor Democratic Representatives Barbara Lee and Lynn Woolsey, who say a public option “must” be added to the bill in conference, will say they won’t vote for the bill without it. Seriously, you just can’t make this stuff up. What good is a demand if you want pull the trigger?

Read full story · Comments { 8 }

Stop The Stupid

Oh, no he didn’t.

Those elements are in the House and Senate versions of the legislation; their competing proposals will have to be reconciled in conference committee next year. The House bill includes a government-run insurance plan favored by progressive Democrats; the Senate version does not. “I didn’t campaign on the public option,” Obama said in the interview.Washington Post

Because yes he did.

Campaign documents prove it:

(2) NEW AFFORDABLE, ACCESSIBLE HEALTH INSURANCE OPTIONS. The Obama-Biden plan will create a National Health Insurance Exchange to help individuals purchase new affordable health care options if they are uninsured or want new health insurance. Through the Exchange, any American will have the opportunity to enroll in the new public plan or an approved private plan, and income-based sliding scale tax credits will be provided for people and families who need it. Insurers would have to issue every applicant a policy and charge fair and stable premiums that will not depend upon health status. The Exchange will require that all the plans offered are at least as generous as the new public plan and meet the same standards for quality and efficiency. Insurers would be required to justify an above-average premium increase to the Exchange. The Exchange would evaluate plans and make the differences among the plans, including cost of services, transparent.

Huffington Post has the mother lode of Obama health care flashbacks, from a post back in August.

As for the video, it begins with mandates, with candidate Obama against them before Pres. Obama decided he was for them. But topping that is this regarding drug and insurance companies:

“They should have a seat at the table, but they can’t buy every chair.” – candidate Obama

This quote weaves through most health care videos available, which while comparing the reality of the Senate bill makes you feel that someone’s snatched candidate Obama to replace him with someone most never knew.

There’s more, going back to his campaign documents, because there’s only one way to “help increase competition.”

Barack Obama and Joe Biden’s new National Health Insurance Exchange will also help increase competition by insurers.

And…

Offers a public health insurance option to provide the uninsured and those who can’t find affordable coverage with a real choice.

How gullible does Pres. Obama think we are? Never mind.

Anyone else feeling déjà vu?

At least I’m not getting as much hate mail as I used to.

You are so right, Ms. Marsh. I was rabidly anti-Hillary because I believed she would be what Obama is–though I never thought she would be THIS bad. The bill is indeed immoral and suicidal. The “good” parts of the calamity are going to be like an extra dessert serving on the Titanic. Thanks for your commentary. I read it regularly, and never without the faint taste of crow in my mouth about the 2008 primaries – LP

Read full story · Comments { 44 }

Will Conference Be Kabuki?

As the Senate prepares to vote on health care reform, American voters “mostly disapprove” of the plan 53 – 36 percent and disapprove 56 – 38 percent of President Barack Obama’s handling of the health care issue, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. [...] … … While voters oppose the health care plan, they back two options cut from the Senate bill, supporting 56 – 38 percent giving people the option of coverage by a government health insurance plan and backing 64 – 30 percent allowing younger people to buy into Medicare.Quinnipiac

2_Headed_New_Quarter_gallery

The Senate bill is done, regardless of the reality that 53% of people now disapprove of what Dems are doing, with Obama’s handling of health care at 56% disapproval. Considering the heights where Obama and the Democrats stood this time last year, it’s quite an achievement, with the added drama of one Democrat in the House defecting today. Howard Dean, no doubt, further infuriating the Administration and their willful enablers by getting it right yet again when answering the question of culpability:

The administration is to blame for the public option’s exclusion from healthcare legislation, former Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean said Monday. “Yes,” Dean flatly answered during an appearance on MSNBC when asked if the Obama administration was culpable for losing the public option.

Nevertheless, the dye is cast after the deals have been sweetened to get even Bernie Sanders to sign on. The Democratic leadership did what it had to, because they’re finally seeing the economic disaster that’s been percolating all year coming home in 2010. From CNBC (h/t Americablog):

Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz warned there’s a “significant” chance the U.S. economy will contract in the second half of next year, and urged the government to prepare a second stimulus package to spur job creation. “The likelihood of this slowdown is very, very high,” Stiglitz told reporters in Singapore. “There is a significant chance that the number will be in the negative range.” … – Stiglitz Warns US Economy May Contract Next Year

This year is not ending well for Obama or the Democratic majority in Congress, who have underestimated the fury waiting for them in 2010. That Obama and the Democrats haven’t thought so far about front loading the goodies and getting the health care positives to the people immediately reveals just how bad they’ve botched their leadership charge.

But the Senate bill will pass, which is why I’m not writing in support of any “kill the bill” campaign. Besides, that’s not what I do here. As a political analyst, I lay out what I surmise to be the reality, no matter who it hits. I also won’t write in support of anyone wasting his/her time or efforts, when events have already turned towards conference, the next step, where the House gets to weigh in on the Senate bill (which may actually be the target of the “kill the bill” proponents, giving House members some talking points). But Pelosi isn’t Harry Reid or Barack Obama; she leads with an iron fist. Anyone think she’ll support a caucus mutiny against the Senate bill, especially since Democrats won’t use reconciliation?

Pres. Obama will not stand during the State of the Union without having the health care bill to tout. Imagine the standing ovation and thunderous applause, with people packed in the gallery, someone representative sitting with First Lady Michelle Obama. –Pause for visualization– Got that picture? Hear the noise?

People see what’s happening, however, and Pres. Obama’s esteem has taken a direct hit. “Hope and change” has been forever diminished to executive branch ego gratification. StephenG’s comment using quotes from an Obama interview with American Urban Radio Networks recently, is representative of what I’m seeing in a cascade of emails (keep sending me your thoughts please, or better yet, de-lurk and post a comment!):

… He just won’t fight for you or me. Black, White or whatever. But he will run over pretty much anyone that will threaten his place in history. … – Reader StephenG

I still can’t fathom why the legislation isn’t front loaded, but maybe they didn’t front load the legislation with health care goodies because they’re afraid of the reaction if people start hitting the health care monopoly, with horror stories hitting the local news near you. Democrats want to get through Obama’s first term still being able to tout that what they did on health care changed American lives for the better in order to get Pres. Obama elected to a second. Though it remains to be seen whether the economy will cooperate, or simply set up Mitt Romney for his run in 2012.

But we’re not there yet.

After the Senate bill passes, sometime around Christmas Eve, conference is next. But given the theater to come in January, that the Democrats simply have to get a bill passed or look incompetent at governing, does anyone believe the Democratic leadership will allow a House mutiny to derail what the Senate cobbled together through massive give-aways? A bill that many Senate Democrats believe must remain intact to keep 60 votes, because let’s face it, these people are worn out and have little fight left.

Or will House members, after watching and resting up, come in principles blazing?

“… [...] I look forward to working with the Senate and House Leadership to ensure that the final health care bill address these core principles of affordability, competition, and progressive financing. Lastly, I am troubled that some Senators believe that the House must accept the majority of the concessions embodied in this Senate bill. My message to the these Senators is this: Just as it took compromise to pass your bill last night, so now will it require additional compromise to successfully reconcile your legislation with the House. The Constitution established a bicameral legislature so that neither body would dominate the other.”Rep. John Conyers

What will conference mean if Speaker Pelosi simply allows a rubber stamp for the Senate? How will that reduce the House, with the dynamic between the two chambers continually and historically competitive? Speaker Pelosi’s greatest test as House Speaker may yet be to come. If she can corral her caucus yet again, like she did with the Stupak contingent, Obama will get his win.

Betting against Pelosi on this one is for suckers. Because for good or principle sell out, depending on where you sit, Speaker Pelosi has provided hardball leadership no other Democrat, least of all Pres. Obama, can come close to matching.

Read full story · Comments { 43 }

If Obama Was a Liberal We’d Have a Better Bill

cross-posted at Huffington Post

We’re not changing our health-care system very much at all, in fact. Nothing happens in 2010. Or in 2011. Or in 2012. In 2014, when the bill really begins, the insurance situations of 18 million people change. A full 16 million of those people are uninsured. Aside from the small sliver of people who will pay a surtax on the final few dollars of uncommonly expensive insurance plans, the country simply will not notice this legislation. [...] – Ezra Klein, The amazing disappearing bill

If Harry Reid was a liberal we’d have a better bill.

If Speaker Pelosi was a liberal she wouldn’t have invited religious leaders into the room to craft a compromise that sold women out.

If Democrats today were like liberals of the 1960s, some Christmas gift deadline would matter less than getting legislation that offered choice to people, didn’t hold them hostage to an insurance monopoly, protected women’s rights that have already been enshrined in law, didn’t tax the middle class, or penalize people and enforce by fiat mandatory rules to buy insurance inside a fixed market, wouldn’t strap elderly and sick in a rigged system, all on the altar of getting it done before church bells ring on Christmas Eve.

If the Democratic majority was liberal, all of the above would be unnecessary, because the conference committee would be real instead of some (likely) arbitrary Senate rubber stamp.

If Russ Feingold was a liberal he wouldn’t have waited until now to blame Obama for not backing the public option; but he’d also not have voted against women’s preventative health measures.

If Barbara Boxer was a liberal she would have said no to compromises that offer less to women than are already in the law.

If Tom Harkin was a liberal he wouldn’t be trying to sell the Senate legislation that forces people into health care insurance that doesn’t guarantee quality health care.

If Democrats in Congress were liberals, we’d at least have a front loaded bill that gave people goodies so they’d bond to the legislation.

If the progressive caucus, wherever they are hiding their spines, were liberals instead, maybe they would have drawn a line in the sand on principle instead of praying to the Let’s Go Incremental gods while accepting “progress” in the name of capitulation.

If we had more liberals in Congress, instead of blathering about perfection being the enemy of the good, we’d have heard a rallying cry that mediocre is the enemy of effective. The death knell of solutions at a time when action is required to save this country and its middle class from economic catastrophe at the hands of people who support a corpocracy over our democratic republic.

If we had liberals in the Congress, we wouldn’t be levying a middle class tax for health care most families can’t afford.

…and on that note, liberals wouldn’t lie outright and say we were going to insure another 30 million people, when many of these people will likely have to pay the IRS penalty instead of buying the insurance, because the reason they don’t have insurance in the first place is because THEY CAN’T AFFORD IT.

If we had a liberal in the White House who understood the middle class at all, maybe we wouldn’t be giving the insurance companies a guaranteed new group of customers without any choice at all.

If we had a liberal Congress, they would surely know that once the insurance monopolies have their new Fish Meet Barrel customers there really is no incentive for them to do anything for them.

Honestly, if we had this bunch of legislators in the Senate during the 1960s, I seriously doubt the Voting Rights Act would have passed. They wouldn’t have had the strength to stand up for it.

You can’t shoot for greatness if you won’t use your powers.

You can’t be a senator or representative and do your job for people in the Legislative Branch if you’re more interested in saving the person in the Executive Branch, putting political party over what’s right for We the People.

But if you’re going to insist on a selling out to corporate interests and the insurance monopoly, like what Pres. Obama and the Democrats are doing on health care (just like what happened with big banks), the least you could do is give up the goodies to the people from the get go.

It’s always better to give someone a kiss first.

Dumb and Dumber had nothing on this bunch.

Read full story · Comments { 45 }

Democratic Stimulus for Insurance Company Passes

“This is not reform, it’s expansion. …Expansion is a good thing.” – Eliot Spitzer (on Dylan Ratigan’s “Morning Meeting”

ScreenHunter_03 Dec. 21 08.44

Spitzer then went on to blast the pulling of anti-trust portions from the Senate bill.

What a mess.

The graphic is the front page of Talking Points Memo. That’s what traditional and conservative Democrats are selling, that the bill that passed a test vote in the wee hours of the morning is “reform.” Democrats pushed through a Senate bill and are no doubt exultant, though after the Let’s Make A Deal giveaways, I really don’t know what all the applause it about. Who wouldn’t sign on for $100 million? From the New York Times:

healthcare_insco

The roll was called shortly after 1 a.m., with Washington still snowbound after a weekend blizzard, and the Senate voted on party lines to cut off a Republican filibuster of a package of changes to the health care bill by the majority leader, Harry Reid of Nevada.

The vote was 60 to 40 — a tally that is expected to be repeated four times as further procedural hurdles are cleared in the days ahead, and then once more in a dramatic, if predictable, finale tentatively scheduled for 7 p.m. on Christmas Eve.

Both parties hailed the vote as seismic. …

healthcare_insco2

Seismichmmm… As someone who spent two decades in earthquake country, the foreshadowing of choosing that particular word is unsettling, however true it may be.

As for the current Senate bill being “reform,” well, if you call a giant giveaway to an already huge monopoly “reform,” then this is your bill. And if you approve of forcing people into a system that has no competition, you’re going to love it. If you love taxing everyone, including the middle class, get ready to stand in adulation.

I’d say there’s hope because of the preferred House tax plan to hit people making $500,000 and above, but we’re likely stuck with most of what’s in the Senate bill, including onerous taxes on the middle class.

Meanwhile, Sen. Feingold praises the bill, while lowering the boom on Pres. Obama, in a statement that rang hollow to me considering that Feingold voted against women’s preventative care because it was too expensive, while now rationalizing that forcing people into a rigged system is good for anyone.

“I continued that fight during recent negotiations, and I refused to sign onto a deal to drop the public option from the Senate bill. Unfortunately, the lack of support from the administration made keeping the public option in the bill an uphill struggle. Removing the public option from the Senate bill is the wrong move, and eliminates $25 billion in savings. I will be urging members of the House and Senate who draft the final bill to make sure this essential provision is included.” – Feingold: Obama Responsible For Loss Of Public Option

The reality is that Pres. Obama bargained from a position of weakness all year, when he had all the cards to pass a bill that wasn’t filled with trip wires. He failed to do it.

But listening to Sen. Harry Reid talking about the people dying every minute for lack of health care insurance, I couldn’t help but feel I’d landed on Mars. The Democratic majority leader channeling Dick Cheney like rhetoric was positively surreal. At least he didn’t trot out his slavery analogy. After all, it is Christmas.

Read full story · Comments { 23 }