<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: A Merry White Christmas from Washington</title> <atom:link href="http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/</link> <description>Taylor Marsh - News, Political Analysis, Foreign Policy, and  Independent Political Opinion on Progressive Politics</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:38:29 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Noogan</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456463</link> <dc:creator>Noogan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 22:47:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456463</guid> <description>Merry Christmas to you as well, Taylor and Mark and everyone. I grew up in Washington DC and it is still to me one of the greatest cities in which to live. I love to visit, just walk around downtown and marvel at the history of the place! As for snow ~ well, I was ROBBED! But, I&#039;m happy for you all who got to enjoy a real White Christmas in Washington DC and surrounding area. :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merry Christmas to you as well, Taylor and Mark and everyone. I grew up in Washington DC and it is still to me one of the greatest cities in which to live. I love to visit, just walk around downtown and marvel at the history of the place! As for snow ~ well, I was ROBBED! But, I&#8217;m happy for you all who got to enjoy a real White Christmas in Washington DC and surrounding area. <img
src='http://taylormarsh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: www.democratz.org</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456410</link> <dc:creator>www.democratz.org</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 11:07:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456410</guid> <description>I don’t like busting your feminist bubble Taylor but Diane Sawyer worked for Richard Nixon. No way I will watch ABC Evening News with her as the anchor. I only watch NBC Nightly News out of the three.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t like busting your feminist bubble Taylor but Diane Sawyer worked for Richard Nixon. No way I will watch ABC Evening News with her as the anchor. I only watch NBC Nightly News out of the three.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Don Bacon</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456385</link> <dc:creator>Don Bacon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 02:39:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456385</guid> <description>Secular, it&#039;s not a question of law, but one of common sense and a feeling for people. Good order and discipline, essential to accomplishing a mission, in a military unit is not based solely on giving and taking orders. It is based on mutual respect among all members of a unit, something this wrongful order disregarded.Any commander that behaves in an autocratic, unfeeling manner without considering the  welfare of his troops is bound to fail. In extreme cases like the last stages of Vietnam it even led to fragging and a complete breakdown of the Army. Recognizing this, General Odierno made a wise move. I expect Chucklehead will himself be moving, next. You just don&#039;t treat your people that way and get away with it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Secular, it&#8217;s not a question of law, but one of common sense and a feeling for people. Good order and discipline, essential to accomplishing a mission, in a military unit is not based solely on giving and taking orders. It is based on mutual respect among all members of a unit, something this wrongful order disregarded.</p><p>Any commander that behaves in an autocratic, unfeeling manner without considering the  welfare of his troops is bound to fail. In extreme cases like the last stages of Vietnam it even led to fragging and a complete breakdown of the Army. Recognizing this, General Odierno made a wise move. I expect Chucklehead will himself be moving, next. You just don&#8217;t treat your people that way and get away with it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Don Bacon</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456384</link> <dc:creator>Don Bacon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 02:27:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456384</guid> <description>No doubt someone told General Odierno (or he already knew) how many coat-hanger abortions General Chucklehead could expect in his command if that stupid order were not rescinded.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt someone told General Odierno (or he already knew) how many coat-hanger abortions General Chucklehead could expect in his command if that stupid order were not rescinded.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taylor Marsh</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456381</link> <dc:creator>Taylor Marsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:56:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456381</guid> <description>PissedOffAmerican says:
26 December 2009 at 2:23 pmOh, and by the way, since you missed it, this is a free for all, open topic thread, POA. Additionally, it&#039;s *your* choice to post around here or not. If you don&#039;t like the company there are many other sites from which to choose.Imhotep, yes, secularh is a veteran.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PissedOffAmerican says:<br
/> 26 December 2009 at 2:23 pm</p><p>Oh, and by the way, since you missed it, this is a free for all, open topic thread, POA. Additionally, it&#8217;s *your* choice to post around here or not. If you don&#8217;t like the company there are many other sites from which to choose.</p><p>Imhotep, yes, secularh is a veteran.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Imhotep</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456367</link> <dc:creator>Imhotep</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 00:17:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456367</guid> <description>Lawful orders, secularhuman, lawful orders.  Tell us all about what a lawful order is?  And what it is not?  Again, were you ever in the military?  Peace</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawful orders, secularhuman, lawful orders.  Tell us all about what a lawful order is?  And what it is not?  Again, were you ever in the military?  Peace</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: secularhumanizinevoluter</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456351</link> <dc:creator>secularhumanizinevoluter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 22:20:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456351</guid> <description>Don Bacon, if you go on leave and come back with the clap you get a article 15. If you are married and you knock someone OTHER then your wife up you can be courtmashaled for adultery.
Because a superior office decides to change standing orders regarding policy has NOTHING to do with points of military law other then his order will be obeyed. Like I said, you display an ignorance of The Uniform Code of Military Justice and codes of conduct as well as the obligations VOLUNTARILY taken on and rights surrendered by soldiers
take the oath. You seem to fit right in with theinsane clown possee that has rode in.
imhopless, it&#039;s not my fault you paid as much attention to your oath then as you do to reality today. Remember anything about &quot;obey the lawful orders of my superiors&quot;? The rest of your post(can you REALLY call the bilge you pump a post?) demonstrates what a johnny come lately anarchist/wannabee you are.
piece a workP.S. POA, go fuck yersef</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don Bacon, if you go on leave and come back with the clap you get a article 15. If you are married and you knock someone OTHER then your wife up you can be courtmashaled for adultery.<br
/> Because a superior office decides to change standing orders regarding policy has NOTHING to do with points of military law other then his order will be obeyed. Like I said, you display an ignorance of The Uniform Code of Military Justice and codes of conduct as well as the obligations VOLUNTARILY taken on and rights surrendered by soldiers<br
/> take the oath. You seem to fit right in with theinsane clown possee that has rode in.<br
/> imhopless, it&#8217;s not my fault you paid as much attention to your oath then as you do to reality today. Remember anything about &#8220;obey the lawful orders of my superiors&#8221;? The rest of your post(can you REALLY call the bilge you pump a post?) demonstrates what a johnny come lately anarchist/wannabee you are.<br
/> piece a work</p><p>P.S. POA, go fuck yersef</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Don Bacon</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456334</link> <dc:creator>Don Bacon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 20:41:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456334</guid> <description>secularhumanizinevoluter: &quot;this is PC run amuck.&quot;Apparently General Odierno, who isn&#039;t ignorant of military law either, decided otherwise.news report, Dec 25:
The top United States commander in Iraq, Gen. Ray Odierno,  intends to rescind a policy that had placed pregnant soldiers at risk of discipline.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>secularhumanizinevoluter: &#8220;this is PC run amuck.&#8221;</p><p>Apparently General Odierno, who isn&#8217;t ignorant of military law either, decided otherwise.</p><p>news report, Dec 25:<br
/> The top United States commander in Iraq, Gen. Ray Odierno,  intends to rescind a policy that had placed pregnant soldiers at risk of discipline.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Imhotep</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456333</link> <dc:creator>Imhotep</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 20:41:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456333</guid> <description>secularhuman, when I took the oath I don&#039;t remember it saying anything about me being celibate.  Is that what your oath said when you were sworn into the military?  Or maybe you never served this great country in uniform?  Were you ever in the military?  Peace</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>secularhuman, when I took the oath I don&#8217;t remember it saying anything about me being celibate.  Is that what your oath said when you were sworn into the military?  Or maybe you never served this great country in uniform?  Were you ever in the military?  Peace</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sandmann</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456328</link> <dc:creator>Sandmann</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:48:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456328</guid> <description>PissedOffAmerican says:
26 December 2009 at 2:31 pmDo as you will, it&#039;s all about you...the rest of us are just lucky enough to be allowed to read your irrefutable words of wisdom, right?  Get off your gilded steed and mix with the commoners.  You are not special here.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PissedOffAmerican says:<br
/> 26 December 2009 at 2:31 pm</p><p>Do as you will, it&#8217;s all about you&#8230;the rest of us are just lucky enough to be allowed to read your irrefutable words of wisdom, right?  Get off your gilded steed and mix with the commoners.  You are not special here.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taylor Marsh</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456327</link> <dc:creator>Taylor Marsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:43:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456327</guid> <description>Also wanted to say thanks kris, JA and others for the Christmas cards; Betsy too, who sent me a &lt;del datetime=&quot;2009-12-26T19:48:04+00:00&quot;&gt;email&lt;/del&gt; web Christmas wish.The doggies were *so* cute, kris!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also wanted to say thanks kris, JA and others for the Christmas cards; Betsy too, who sent me a <del
datetime="2009-12-26T19:48:04+00:00">email</del> web Christmas wish.</p><p>The doggies were *so* cute, kris!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PissedOffAmerican</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456326</link> <dc:creator>PissedOffAmerican</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:31:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456326</guid> <description>&quot;I hope you stick around, but I suggest you lose the “my opinion is the only one that matters” stance and engage those who post here with a bit of respect else quit complaining about those like secular who call you out on it&quot;Thats hillarious. I post a diary, and Secular ALWAYS jumps in with some excremental ad homninem, and you want ME to &quot;engage those who post here with a bit of respect&quot;. Gee, is this where I adopt Secular&#039;s brand of respect, and tell you to &quot;go fuck yourself&quot;?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I hope you stick around, but I suggest you lose the “my opinion is the only one that matters” stance and engage those who post here with a bit of respect else quit complaining about those like secular who call you out on it&#8221;</p><p>Thats hillarious. I post a diary, and Secular ALWAYS jumps in with some excremental ad homninem, and you want ME to &#8220;engage those who post here with a bit of respect&#8221;. Gee, is this where I adopt Secular&#8217;s brand of respect, and tell you to &#8220;go fuck yourself&#8221;?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PissedOffAmerican</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456323</link> <dc:creator>PissedOffAmerican</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:23:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456323</guid> <description>Do you really miss seeing how secular&#039;s non-stop excrement discourages participation?&quot;MOVE ON PAST THEM&quot;? Post after post of horsehit, off topic, venomous, nasty spew. Far far far more despicable, vulgar, distracting, insulting and toxic than ANYTHING I ever posted here and was subsequently banned for.Your attitude on this is inexplicable to me. Why even bother to preface threads with &quot;Keep all comments on topic. All others will be deleted&quot; if you have no intention of making good on it?Bottom line, Taylor, Secular is spreading shit all over your comment section, and your tolerance of it has gone beyond the point of him just making an ass of himself. The whole comment section stinks from Secular&#039;s mess.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you really miss seeing how secular&#8217;s non-stop excrement discourages participation?</p><p>&#8220;MOVE ON PAST THEM&#8221;? Post after post of horsehit, off topic, venomous, nasty spew. Far far far more despicable, vulgar, distracting, insulting and toxic than ANYTHING I ever posted here and was subsequently banned for.</p><p>Your attitude on this is inexplicable to me. Why even bother to preface threads with &#8220;Keep all comments on topic. All others will be deleted&#8221; if you have no intention of making good on it?</p><p>Bottom line, Taylor, Secular is spreading shit all over your comment section, and your tolerance of it has gone beyond the point of him just making an ass of himself. The whole comment section stinks from Secular&#8217;s mess.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sandmann</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456322</link> <dc:creator>Sandmann</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456322</guid> <description>PissedOffAmerican says:
26 December 2009 at 1:47 pmIMO, maybe it&#039;s the condescending tone you take that grinds secular&#039;s gears.  If you don&#039;t like the &quot;clique&quot; then kick rocks, what makes you stick around?  I appreciate your input here although I cannot give you feedback on the U.S./Israel posts you are famous for simply because I&#039;m ignorant to the minutiae of that particular discussion.  That doesn&#039;t mean I don&#039;t gather good information from your posts, it just means I have nothing useful to contribute to the conversation.I hope you stick around, but I suggest you lose the &quot;my opinion is the only one that matters&quot; stance and engage those who post here with a bit of respect else quit complaining about those like secular who call you out on it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PissedOffAmerican says:<br
/> 26 December 2009 at 1:47 pm</p><p>IMO, maybe it&#8217;s the condescending tone you take that grinds secular&#8217;s gears.  If you don&#8217;t like the &#8220;clique&#8221; then kick rocks, what makes you stick around?  I appreciate your input here although I cannot give you feedback on the U.S./Israel posts you are famous for simply because I&#8217;m ignorant to the minutiae of that particular discussion.  That doesn&#8217;t mean I don&#8217;t gather good information from your posts, it just means I have nothing useful to contribute to the conversation.</p><p>I hope you stick around, but I suggest you lose the &#8220;my opinion is the only one that matters&#8221; stance and engage those who post here with a bit of respect else quit complaining about those like secular who call you out on it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taylor Marsh</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456318</link> <dc:creator>Taylor Marsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 18:58:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456318</guid> <description>My suggestion to you, POA, as well as others who don&#039;t take to a particular person commenting here is MOVE ON PAST THEM. The insults are unnecessary, as it would be much more interesting to disagree on ISSUES, going at each other on that point.Staying focused on ISSUES and debating through them would be better for everyone.Merry Christmas, pmichael, alphonsegaston, lynnette and everyone else.secularhumanizinevoluter says:
25 December 2009 at 9:17 amBest to you, sir. It&#039;s a great group, &quot;crowd,&quot; whatever you want to call it around here, as I include the lurkers I hear from every day.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My suggestion to you, POA, as well as others who don&#8217;t take to a particular person commenting here is MOVE ON PAST THEM. The insults are unnecessary, as it would be much more interesting to disagree on ISSUES, going at each other on that point.</p><p>Staying focused on ISSUES and debating through them would be better for everyone.</p><p>Merry Christmas, pmichael, alphonsegaston, lynnette and everyone else.</p><p>secularhumanizinevoluter says:<br
/> 25 December 2009 at 9:17 am</p><p>Best to you, sir. It&#8217;s a great group, &#8220;crowd,&#8221; whatever you want to call it around here, as I include the lurkers I hear from every day.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PissedOffAmerican</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456316</link> <dc:creator>PissedOffAmerican</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 18:47:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456316</guid> <description>&quot;Taylor, you attract the best crowd&quot;What &quot;crowd&quot;?Looks like a &quot;clique&quot; to me, and it seems to be shrinking with each passing week. Perhaps not being able to engage in anything other than wading through Secular&#039;s shit has something to do with it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Taylor, you attract the best crowd&#8221;</p><p>What &#8220;crowd&#8221;?</p><p>Looks like a &#8220;clique&#8221; to me, and it seems to be shrinking with each passing week. Perhaps not being able to engage in anything other than wading through Secular&#8217;s shit has something to do with it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sandmann</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456314</link> <dc:creator>Sandmann</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 18:37:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456314</guid> <description>Hope everyone has recovered from their eggnog hangovers after a great Christmas!!!  Thanks for the great site and analysis Taylor, you attract the best crowd.secularhumanizinevoluter says:
26 December 2009 at 12:54 pm------------------I agree with Secular 100%, when you sign a military contract the government OWNS you lock, stock, and barrel.  I remember my Company Commander warning us that if we were off duty and got a sunburn that affected our ability to carry out our assigned duties, we would be subject to disciplinary action.Becoming pregnant falls in the same category.  Pregnancy obviously affects your ability to carry out the duties assigned to you, period.  You belong to the government, you have no rights per se according to the Uniform Code of Military Justice...for as long as your contract is valid with the military, the UCMJ is the whole of the law.You can extend this to DADT, when you sign the contract, those are the terms you accept.  When you sign on the dotted line, you forfeit the right to complain about it for as long as the government holds your contract.The military isn&#039;t a Democracy, you don&#039;t get a say in which rules apply to you and which ones don&#039;t.  Secular is spot on about this being PC gone crazy, people have lost their minds.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope everyone has recovered from their eggnog hangovers after a great Christmas!!!  Thanks for the great site and analysis Taylor, you attract the best crowd.</p><p>secularhumanizinevoluter says:<br
/> 26 December 2009 at 12:54 pm</p><p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p><p>I agree with Secular 100%, when you sign a military contract the government OWNS you lock, stock, and barrel.  I remember my Company Commander warning us that if we were off duty and got a sunburn that affected our ability to carry out our assigned duties, we would be subject to disciplinary action.</p><p>Becoming pregnant falls in the same category.  Pregnancy obviously affects your ability to carry out the duties assigned to you, period.  You belong to the government, you have no rights per se according to the Uniform Code of Military Justice&#8230;for as long as your contract is valid with the military, the UCMJ is the whole of the law.</p><p>You can extend this to DADT, when you sign the contract, those are the terms you accept.  When you sign on the dotted line, you forfeit the right to complain about it for as long as the government holds your contract.</p><p>The military isn&#8217;t a Democracy, you don&#8217;t get a say in which rules apply to you and which ones don&#8217;t.  Secular is spot on about this being PC gone crazy, people have lost their minds.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: secularhumanizinevoluter</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456307</link> <dc:creator>secularhumanizinevoluter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 17:54:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456307</guid> <description>&quot;I noticed that the militray has instructed Maj Gen Chucklehead to rescind his dumb order on illegal pregnancies in Iraq. That’s good news. The military should now bust this idiot Maj Gen down to private and assign him to a duty station where he’ll do no additional harm. Perhaps shoveling snow in Greenland? Peace&quot;From the articles I could find there was a general review of the orders governing opperations and his order was not included in the new one. Not quite the same thing.
On what grounds would you have them &quot;bust this idiot Maj Gen&quot;?
That he was trying to actually have everyone pull their own weight and live up to the reponsibility they took on when they joined? So all the OTHERS who wear the uniform now get to pick up THEIR slak.
This is the first time I have ever said this, but this is PC run amuck.
Don bacon, you are obviously ignorant of military law and individual soldiers responsibilities and obligations incured when they take the oath.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I noticed that the militray has instructed Maj Gen Chucklehead to rescind his dumb order on illegal pregnancies in Iraq. That’s good news. The military should now bust this idiot Maj Gen down to private and assign him to a duty station where he’ll do no additional harm. Perhaps shoveling snow in Greenland? Peace&#8221;</p><p>From the articles I could find there was a general review of the orders governing opperations and his order was not included in the new one. Not quite the same thing.<br
/> On what grounds would you have them &#8220;bust this idiot Maj Gen&#8221;?<br
/> That he was trying to actually have everyone pull their own weight and live up to the reponsibility they took on when they joined? So all the OTHERS who wear the uniform now get to pick up THEIR slak.<br
/> This is the first time I have ever said this, but this is PC run amuck.<br
/> Don bacon, you are obviously ignorant of military law and individual soldiers responsibilities and obligations incured when they take the oath.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Don Bacon</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456300</link> <dc:creator>Don Bacon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 17:27:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456300</guid> <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;. . .any female soldier who gets pregnant would be punished . . .I fully support Cucolo’s policy. . .Women sign up for the job. They need to do their duty.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Why not extend this policy to all women everywhere? WalMart clerk gets a baby bump, it&#039;s a $500 fine and a month in the slammer. Bunch of whiners, if you ask me. Next thing you know they&#039;ll be wanting equal pay, and stuff like that.Women sign up for the job. They need to do their duty, everywhere.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>. . .any female soldier who gets pregnant would be punished . . .I fully support Cucolo’s policy. . .Women sign up for the job. They need to do their duty.</p></blockquote><p>Why not extend this policy to all women everywhere? WalMart clerk gets a baby bump, it&#8217;s a $500 fine and a month in the slammer. Bunch of whiners, if you ask me. Next thing you know they&#8217;ll be wanting equal pay, and stuff like that.</p><p>Women sign up for the job. They need to do their duty, everywhere.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Imhotep</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456283</link> <dc:creator>Imhotep</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:08:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456283</guid> <description>I noticed that the militray has instructed Maj Gen Chucklehead to rescind his dumb order on illegal pregnancies in Iraq.  That&#039;s good news.  The military should now bust this idiot Maj Gen down to private and assign him to a duty station where he&#039;ll do no additional harm.  Perhaps shoveling snow in Greenland?  Peace</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that the militray has instructed Maj Gen Chucklehead to rescind his dumb order on illegal pregnancies in Iraq.  That&#8217;s good news.  The military should now bust this idiot Maj Gen down to private and assign him to a duty station where he&#8217;ll do no additional harm.  Perhaps shoveling snow in Greenland?  Peace</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pmichael</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456273</link> <dc:creator>pmichael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 02:14:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456273</guid> <description>Gee, Sec. Tell us how you &lt;b&gt;really&lt;/b&gt; Feel. :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, Sec. Tell us how you <b>really</b> Feel. <img
src='http://taylormarsh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: secularhumanizinevoluter</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456270</link> <dc:creator>secularhumanizinevoluter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 22:12:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456270</guid> <description>&quot;I think your statement is generally preposterous.&quot;
djjl, you think their STATEMENT is preposperous?
Singular?
What statement have these two uberlefty, egomaniacl tools made that hasn&#039;t been preposterous?
From the LECHER Hillary R. Clinton to the horseshit THE CIA IS RUNNIN DRUGS to WE were involved in 9/11 to FDR KNEW about Pearl Harbor but did nothing to get America into the war to a virtual sewer outlet of unsupported college level &quot;radical&quot; gurgglings about everything Obama, Democratic AND repugnatklan.
This piece of work never HAS bothered to mention any politicions he/she/it would support. Only how they are ALL tools of the rich powerfull blah,blah,blah ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzz.
Both preposterous and BORING. And VERY unoriginal.
And throw in the bit about the juvinile level ego coupled with the self demonstrated fact of being a LIAR.
SINGLE statement is preposterous?
BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Thanks, you provided quite a laugh with that subtle understatement. One could even say sarcastic. And unlike the po widdlw one&#039;s attempts quite successful.As for the women in the military. ABSO-FU*KIN-LUTELY hold them responsible for pregnancy unless rape or failur of contraception is involved.
For the information of the mentally chalanged when you join, voluntairily join the military you give up certain rights and place yourself under the jurisdiction of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
They most certainly CAN be held responsible for willfully disobeying an order.As for this tool being the arbitor of who is or isn&#039;t a &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;progressive&quot;,&quot;feminist&quot; or whatever. How VERY nice of the child(we are talking emotional maturity here) to GIVE us poor rubes the correct definition. Which just happens to be HIS/HER/IT&#039;S definition. How very nice.
I&#039;m just curious if there is actually a place they spew this tripe and AREN&#039;T thought to be anything but steryotypical tools?
To EVERYONE, tools and sane alike, MERRY,MERRY!
P.S. Just got back from seeing the new Holmes movie...save your money.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think your statement is generally preposterous.&#8221;<br
/> djjl, you think their STATEMENT is preposperous?<br
/> Singular?<br
/> What statement have these two uberlefty, egomaniacl tools made that hasn&#8217;t been preposterous?<br
/> From the LECHER Hillary R. Clinton to the horseshit THE CIA IS RUNNIN DRUGS to WE were involved in 9/11 to FDR KNEW about Pearl Harbor but did nothing to get America into the war to a virtual sewer outlet of unsupported college level &#8220;radical&#8221; gurgglings about everything Obama, Democratic AND repugnatklan.<br
/> This piece of work never HAS bothered to mention any politicions he/she/it would support. Only how they are ALL tools of the rich powerfull blah,blah,blah ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzz.<br
/> Both preposterous and BORING. And VERY unoriginal.<br
/> And throw in the bit about the juvinile level ego coupled with the self demonstrated fact of being a LIAR.<br
/> SINGLE statement is preposterous?<br
/> BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Thanks, you provided quite a laugh with that subtle understatement. One could even say sarcastic. And unlike the po widdlw one&#8217;s attempts quite successful.</p><p>As for the women in the military. ABSO-FU*KIN-LUTELY hold them responsible for pregnancy unless rape or failur of contraception is involved.<br
/> For the information of the mentally chalanged when you join, voluntairily join the military you give up certain rights and place yourself under the jurisdiction of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.<br
/> They most certainly CAN be held responsible for willfully disobeying an order.</p><p>As for this tool being the arbitor of who is or isn&#8217;t a &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;progressive&#8221;,&#8221;feminist&#8221; or whatever. How VERY nice of the child(we are talking emotional maturity here) to GIVE us poor rubes the correct definition. Which just happens to be HIS/HER/IT&#8217;S definition. How very nice.<br
/> I&#8217;m just curious if there is actually a place they spew this tripe and AREN&#8217;T thought to be anything but steryotypical tools?<br
/> To EVERYONE, tools and sane alike, MERRY,MERRY!<br
/> P.S. Just got back from seeing the new Holmes movie&#8230;save your money.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pmichael</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456269</link> <dc:creator>pmichael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 19:22:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456269</guid> <description>Much like &quot;intelligent&quot;, most people&#039;s definition of &quot;sane&quot; is _
_ all those people who agree with me. *L*
Everyone else is stupid. ;-)Off to grandma&#039;s house. Melly melly Christmas !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much like &#8220;intelligent&#8221;, most people&#8217;s definition of &#8220;sane&#8221; is _<br
/> _ all those people who agree with me. *L*<br
/> Everyone else is stupid. <img
src='http://taylormarsh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Off to grandma&#8217;s house. Melly melly Christmas !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456268</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 19:22:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456268</guid> <description>poaI never spoke of any threats, I don&#039;t make threats.  I am not a &quot;he.&quot; Not sure that it makes any difference in our exchanges here.   You just seem to look for the worst interpretation in many of the posts here.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>poa</p><p>I never spoke of any threats, I don&#8217;t make threats.  I am not a &#8220;he.&#8221; Not sure that it makes any difference in our exchanges here.   You just seem to look for the worst interpretation in many of the posts here.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: www.democratz.org</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456267</link> <dc:creator>www.democratz.org</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 19:02:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456267</guid> <description>http://endthewars.democratz.org/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://endthewars.democratz.org/" rel="nofollow">http://endthewars.democratz.org/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PissedOffAmerican</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456266</link> <dc:creator>PissedOffAmerican</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:13:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456266</guid> <description>Wooooosh. No small suprise that the satire of my comment would whiz right over his head.Sanity is threatening someone over the internet, while claiming to be a member of an infamously murderous batch of biker thugs? Thats &quot;sanity&quot;? In your book, maybe. And I&#039;m supposed to wish such &quot;sane&quot; people &quot;Merry Christmas&quot;?And your grip on sanity? Unable to recognize how insane it is to threaten someone over the internet, while claiming to be a member of an infamously murderous batch of biker thugs, is somehow indicative of a sound mind? Decrying my often sarcastic manner of rebuttal during debate, while ignoring some asshole&#039;s act of threatening a poster with bodily harm is reason to consider you healthy in mind?And Secular&#039;s idea that contrived illiteracy and a steady stream of off topic, shallow, and venomous invective somehow comprises intelligent and sane rebuttal????Like I said, a heartfelt Merry Christmas to the sane members of this blog community, of which there seem to be a few.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wooooosh. No small suprise that the satire of my comment would whiz right over his head.</p><p>Sanity is threatening someone over the internet, while claiming to be a member of an infamously murderous batch of biker thugs? Thats &#8220;sanity&#8221;? In your book, maybe. And I&#8217;m supposed to wish such &#8220;sane&#8221; people &#8220;Merry Christmas&#8221;?</p><p>And your grip on sanity? Unable to recognize how insane it is to threaten someone over the internet, while claiming to be a member of an infamously murderous batch of biker thugs, is somehow indicative of a sound mind? Decrying my often sarcastic manner of rebuttal during debate, while ignoring some asshole&#8217;s act of threatening a poster with bodily harm is reason to consider you healthy in mind?</p><p>And Secular&#8217;s idea that contrived illiteracy and a steady stream of off topic, shallow, and venomous invective somehow comprises intelligent and sane rebuttal????</p><p>Like I said, a heartfelt Merry Christmas to the sane members of this blog community, of which there seem to be a few.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456265</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 17:56:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456265</guid> <description>Virtually all posters here are sane.I don&#039;t know what people secretly believe but I do know that women have a great deal of control over birth control.  I also know that there can be rape and birth control failure (like antibiotics interfering with oral birth control, etc.  Women who choose to be in the armed forces must realize that it is each soldier&#039;s responsibility for the share of &quot;readiness.&quot;  Yeah, I think women shoulder a disproportionate responsibility for sexual activity - but a woman is a woman.  That&#039;s just how the biology works.I think your statement is generally preposterous.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virtually all posters here are sane.</p><p>I don&#8217;t know what people secretly believe but I do know that women have a great deal of control over birth control.  I also know that there can be rape and birth control failure (like antibiotics interfering with oral birth control, etc.  Women who choose to be in the armed forces must realize that it is each soldier&#8217;s responsibility for the share of &#8220;readiness.&#8221;  Yeah, I think women shoulder a disproportionate responsibility for sexual activity &#8211; but a woman is a woman.  That&#8217;s just how the biology works.</p><p>I think your statement is generally preposterous.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PissedOffAmerican</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456263</link> <dc:creator>PissedOffAmerican</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 17:15:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456263</guid> <description>&quot;In fact, I think it should be U.S. Armed Forces policy. Women sign up for the job. They need to do their duty&quot;Well, considering the chauvanistic environment that women in the service find themselves, I&#039;d say the 95% of the brass secretly believe that a woman getting pregnent IS fullfilling her duty, particularly if they do so while making stew and sewing buttons on uniforms.Merry Christmas to the sane members of this blog community.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In fact, I think it should be U.S. Armed Forces policy. Women sign up for the job. They need to do their duty&#8221;</p><p>Well, considering the chauvanistic environment that women in the service find themselves, I&#8217;d say the 95% of the brass secretly believe that a woman getting pregnent IS fullfilling her duty, particularly if they do so while making stew and sewing buttons on uniforms.</p><p>Merry Christmas to the sane members of this blog community.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456261</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 16:48:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456261</guid> <description>The 4th woman refused to give the name of the father of her child.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 4th woman refused to give the name of the father of her child.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Imhotep</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/a-merry-white-christmas-from-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-456259</link> <dc:creator>Imhotep</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 15:50:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46579#comment-456259</guid> <description>I once thought that this was a Progressive, feminist site.  But this essay proved that thinking to be entirely incorrect.  This site is neither Progressive (all sorts of pro-war chatter and kill the enemy nonsense) nor feminist.  Maj. Gen. Chucklehead seems not to understand that only woman can get pregnant.  Males and females can have sex, but men have never, to my knowledge, ended up pregnant.  In the 4 cases of pregnant women that Maj. Gen. Chucklehead viewed when making his ridiculous decision, he was able to identfy all of the pregnant women-----gee, what a surprise?  But he was only able to identify 3 of the men who impregnated those woman.  Which means that one guy got his jollies off and got away scott free.  Therein, lies the stupidity of Maj Gen Chuckleheads quite backwards thinking.  Which is that most 18 to 24 year olds, male and female, are gonna f*** like bunnies but only the female can ever really be found out.  Maj. Gen. Chuckelhead is an idiot.  Peace</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once thought that this was a Progressive, feminist site.  But this essay proved that thinking to be entirely incorrect.  This site is neither Progressive (all sorts of pro-war chatter and kill the enemy nonsense) nor feminist.  Maj. Gen. Chucklehead seems not to understand that only woman can get pregnant.  Males and females can have sex, but men have never, to my knowledge, ended up pregnant.  In the 4 cases of pregnant women that Maj. Gen. Chucklehead viewed when making his ridiculous decision, he was able to identfy all of the pregnant women&#8212;&#8211;gee, what a surprise?  But he was only able to identify 3 of the men who impregnated those woman.  Which means that one guy got his jollies off and got away scott free.  Therein, lies the stupidity of Maj Gen Chuckleheads quite backwards thinking.  Which is that most 18 to 24 year olds, male and female, are gonna f*** like bunnies but only the female can ever really be found out.  Maj. Gen. Chuckelhead is an idiot.  Peace</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/64 queries in 0.109 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 1289/1383 objects using memcached

Served from: taylormarsh.com @ 2012-02-10 14:53:05 -->
