<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Ben Nelson Gets His Lieberman</title> <atom:link href="http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/</link> <description>Taylor Marsh - News, Political Analysis, Foreign Policy, and  Independent Political Opinion on Progressive Politics</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:32:07 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455831</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:18:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455831</guid> <description>They don&#039;t get it in a million ways.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They don&#8217;t get it in a million ways.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taylor Marsh</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455752</link> <dc:creator>Taylor Marsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:39:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455752</guid> <description>This bill, forcing mandates on people w/o real competition, is a GIFT to insurance companies.I put this in the new thread, but everyone needs to understand that the insurance industry titans and lobbyists are Dem&#039;s peeps, including Pres. Obama&#039;s, too.http://www.chicagotribune.com/health/chi-health-lobbyists_bddec20,0,5453763,print.story</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This bill, forcing mandates on people w/o real competition, is a GIFT to insurance companies.</p><p>I put this in the new thread, but everyone needs to understand that the insurance industry titans and lobbyists are Dem&#8217;s peeps, including Pres. Obama&#8217;s, too.</p><p><a
href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/health/chi-health-lobbyists_bddec20,0,5453763,print.story" rel="nofollow">http://www.chicagotribune.com/health/chi-health-lobbyists_bddec20,0,5453763,print.story</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Daryl24</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455737</link> <dc:creator>Daryl24</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:10:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455737</guid> <description>&quot;That’s gonna work about as well as it worked with keeping an eye on Wall Street.&quot;Neither you or I know how it&#039;s going to work. We will have to wait and see. Like the bank bailout. Many people thought that was a mistake but lo and behold most of the banks have already paid the money back.
TM:True that but ain&#039;t the insurance industry their peeps? I&#039;d figure they would not do anything to upset their cow.
Again if the industry is playing fair and being consistently monitored I don&#039;t have a problem with them making more money.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That’s gonna work about as well as it worked with keeping an eye on Wall Street.&#8221;</p><p>Neither you or I know how it&#8217;s going to work. We will have to wait and see. Like the bank bailout. Many people thought that was a mistake but lo and behold most of the banks have already paid the money back.</p><p>TM:</p><p>True that but ain&#8217;t the insurance industry their peeps? I&#8217;d figure they would not do anything to upset their cow.</p><p>Again if the industry is playing fair and being consistently monitored I don&#8217;t have a problem with them making more money.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taylor Marsh</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455730</link> <dc:creator>Taylor Marsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 16:54:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455730</guid> <description>&lt;i&gt;If this is that kind of giveaway I just wondering why Republicans are filibustering. ... &lt;/i&gt;You&#039;re kidding, right? They obstruct because that&#039;s what they do.As for the insurance industry, there&#039;s a reason their stocks are skyrocketing, and it&#039;s NOT because of how bad the bill is for their business.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If this is that kind of giveaway I just wondering why Republicans are filibustering. &#8230; </i></p><p>You&#8217;re kidding, right? They obstruct because that&#8217;s what they do.</p><p>As for the insurance industry, there&#8217;s a reason their stocks are skyrocketing, and it&#8217;s NOT because of how bad the bill is for their business.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Imhotep</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455729</link> <dc:creator>Imhotep</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 16:53:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455729</guid> <description>&quot;Playing fair and keeping an eye on them&quot;...........please.  That&#039;s gonna work about as well as it worked with keeping an eye on Wall Street.  The Republicans would filibuster a Bill by the Democrats that proclaimed that the sky was blue.  Some of the biggest recipients of BIG insurance company money are Democrats.  Lieberman(I), Baucus, Nelson, Landrieu, etc, etc.  Oh, I forgot....Obama.  This is a bad bill as it now stands.  Peace</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Playing fair and keeping an eye on them&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..please.  That&#8217;s gonna work about as well as it worked with keeping an eye on Wall Street.  The Republicans would filibuster a Bill by the Democrats that proclaimed that the sky was blue.  Some of the biggest recipients of BIG insurance company money are Democrats.  Lieberman(I), Baucus, Nelson, Landrieu, etc, etc.  Oh, I forgot&#8230;.Obama.  This is a bad bill as it now stands.  Peace</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Daryl24</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455720</link> <dc:creator>Daryl24</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:55:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455720</guid> <description>Imhotep:I disagree. It&#039;s a good bill not great but a pretty good start. I don&#039;t think the insurance industry is all that thrilled since one of the ways the Reid Bill pays for reform is to tax the money on those insurance profits.If this is that kind of giveaway I just wondering why Republicans are filibustering. The insurance companies are one of their cash cows. Stands the reason then they would be leading the charge to pass this bill.I&#039;m not sure about the actual leftist label in the fact I&#039;ve never really thought about it in those terms. But I do think people were looking for a bill that really put the hammer to the insurance industry. That was never in the cards.If the industry is making more money by finally playing fair and the regulators are keeping a serious eye on them I really don&#039;t have a problem with them making more money. The key though is playing fair and keeping an eye on them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imhotep:</p><p>I disagree. It&#8217;s a good bill not great but a pretty good start. I don&#8217;t think the insurance industry is all that thrilled since one of the ways the Reid Bill pays for reform is to tax the money on those insurance profits.</p><p>If this is that kind of giveaway I just wondering why Republicans are filibustering. The insurance companies are one of their cash cows. Stands the reason then they would be leading the charge to pass this bill.</p><p>I&#8217;m not sure about the actual leftist label in the fact I&#8217;ve never really thought about it in those terms. But I do think people were looking for a bill that really put the hammer to the insurance industry. That was never in the cards.</p><p>If the industry is making more money by finally playing fair and the regulators are keeping a serious eye on them I really don&#8217;t have a problem with them making more money. The key though is playing fair and keeping an eye on them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Imhotep</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455717</link> <dc:creator>Imhotep</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:18:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455717</guid> <description>Daryl24, the bill does indeed &quot;suck&quot; for anybody who is an actual Leftist.  For all of the faux-Progressives and Liberals it is seen as &quot;the best we could get.&quot;  What rubbish.  This bill GIVES the insurance companies 30 million new customers.  Then it GIVES those same insurance companies subsidies in the form of tax dollars for anyone who can&#039;t afford to buy the insurance.  What the insurance companies are forced to do to get these billions in &#039;windfall&#039; profits from the government is to agree to spend only 20% of them on salaries and other perks.  This will create huge profits for the insurance industry which the federal government will guarantee.  Which is why insurance stocks closed at an all time high on friday.  This bill sucks.  Peace</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daryl24, the bill does indeed &#8220;suck&#8221; for anybody who is an actual Leftist.  For all of the faux-Progressives and Liberals it is seen as &#8220;the best we could get.&#8221;  What rubbish.  This bill GIVES the insurance companies 30 million new customers.  Then it GIVES those same insurance companies subsidies in the form of tax dollars for anyone who can&#8217;t afford to buy the insurance.  What the insurance companies are forced to do to get these billions in &#8216;windfall&#8217; profits from the government is to agree to spend only 20% of them on salaries and other perks.  This will create huge profits for the insurance industry which the federal government will guarantee.  Which is why insurance stocks closed at an all time high on friday.  This bill sucks.  Peace</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Daryl24</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455716</link> <dc:creator>Daryl24</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:19:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455716</guid> <description>&quot;The trouble is that this bill sucks. Deans 1st choice is to start over and go thru reconciliation, but he won’t get that.&quot;Even if he got that he would not get anywhere near what this bill provides. The bill is flawed but it does not suck. It really is going to do a lot of good for a lot of people and the CBO has estimated in the long run its going to save a lot of money. Even by the most conservative of estimates this bill is the most sweeping expansion since the Great Society.Imo Dean is wrong. not only because Reconciliation has become the cure all when it is not. I know it takes a simple majority but there is no guarantee the votes are there.Instead of starting over and piece mealing it through the best idea would be to pass the darn thing and fill in the gaps. That&#039;s where reconciliation really can do a lot of good.Jay Rockefeller, Chuck Schumer and Sherrod Brown are excited about this bill. There not 100 percent overjoyed because as Rockerfeller admitted nobody got everything they wanted but it&#039;s a great start from what I&#039;ve read.I know Dean is a doctor. I also know the AMA and Nurses&#039;s Association supports this bill. In addition Dean wrote an op ed saying the bill had no prudent purchasing to help with cost control. It does.That&#039;s a glaring omission.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The trouble is that this bill sucks. Deans 1st choice is to start over and go thru reconciliation, but he won’t get that.&#8221;</p><p>Even if he got that he would not get anywhere near what this bill provides. The bill is flawed but it does not suck. It really is going to do a lot of good for a lot of people and the CBO has estimated in the long run its going to save a lot of money. Even by the most conservative of estimates this bill is the most sweeping expansion since the Great Society.</p><p>Imo Dean is wrong. not only because Reconciliation has become the cure all when it is not. I know it takes a simple majority but there is no guarantee the votes are there.</p><p>Instead of starting over and piece mealing it through the best idea would be to pass the darn thing and fill in the gaps. That&#8217;s where reconciliation really can do a lot of good.</p><p>Jay Rockefeller, Chuck Schumer and Sherrod Brown are excited about this bill. There not 100 percent overjoyed because as Rockerfeller admitted nobody got everything they wanted but it&#8217;s a great start from what I&#8217;ve read.</p><p>I know Dean is a doctor. I also know the AMA and Nurses&#8217;s Association supports this bill. In addition Dean wrote an op ed saying the bill had no prudent purchasing to help with cost control. It does.</p><p>That&#8217;s a glaring omission.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pmichael</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455715</link> <dc:creator>pmichael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 11:37:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455715</guid> <description>My final thought of the night (though I have my doubts if anyone actually cares what this old man thinks *L* [OH! Secular! If you check in be sure to read my response in the &#039;Bachmann&#039; thread. Need to get your EMail someday :-) )Anywho: Y’know, it is amazing to me the way normally intelligent people simply don’t “get” the entire ‘abortion’ issue. For myself, I understand the key word here is “potential”. On one side we have the scientific viewpoint that this little mass of cells has the ‘potential’ of becoming the next great face carved into Mount Rushmore – but as of yet, it isn’t actually ’sacred’. Pushing the ‘Reset’ button is certainly acceptable on that side of the fence.On the other side, there is a simply *huge* amount of people that believe that little mass of cells is a &lt;b&gt;human being&lt;/b&gt; immediately. So to terminate that life without a damned good reason (like the Mother’s death) is – how do I make this more clear? – &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;First Degree Murder&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;.Until my lovable ‘left’ truly &lt;i&gt;Gets This&lt;/i&gt; we are doomed to argue about the subject until the ‘End-of-Days’ (okay – bad joke – but appropriate). The religious &#039;right&#039; are NOT going to change their minds. Period.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My final thought of the night (though I have my doubts if anyone actually cares what this old man thinks *L* [OH! Secular! If you check in be sure to read my response in the &#8216;Bachmann&#8217; thread. Need to get your EMail someday <img
src='http://taylormarsh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p><p>Anywho: Y’know, it is amazing to me the way normally intelligent people simply don’t “get” the entire ‘abortion’ issue. For myself, I understand the key word here is “potential”. On one side we have the scientific viewpoint that this little mass of cells has the ‘potential’ of becoming the next great face carved into Mount Rushmore – but as of yet, it isn’t actually ’sacred’. Pushing the ‘Reset’ button is certainly acceptable on that side of the fence.</p><p>On the other side, there is a simply *huge* amount of people that believe that little mass of cells is a <b>human being</b> immediately. So to terminate that life without a damned good reason (like the Mother’s death) is – how do I make this more clear? – <b><i>First Degree Murder</i></b>.</p><p>Until my lovable ‘left’ truly <i>Gets This</i> we are doomed to argue about the subject until the ‘End-of-Days’ (okay – bad joke – but appropriate). The religious &#8216;right&#8217; are NOT going to change their minds. Period.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sandmann</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455714</link> <dc:creator>Sandmann</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:16:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455714</guid> <description>Lake Lady says:
19 December 2009 at 2:18 pm--------------Thanks LL and everyone here at Taylor&#039;s pad, Keep your head high, never quit, never lose that vision of a better day.  I often imagine a time where we wake up with a smile simply because we&#039;re able to do what we love for no other reason than that&#039;s where our hearts lead...we are the pioneers of that future.Merry Christmas!P.S. Watch this vid of acoustical guitar genius Jon Butler and try not to smile...I dare you :)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VAkOhXIsI0</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lake Lady says:<br
/> 19 December 2009 at 2:18 pm</p><p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p><p>Thanks LL and everyone here at Taylor&#8217;s pad, Keep your head high, never quit, never lose that vision of a better day.  I often imagine a time where we wake up with a smile simply because we&#8217;re able to do what we love for no other reason than that&#8217;s where our hearts lead&#8230;we are the pioneers of that future.</p><p>Merry Christmas!</p><p>P.S. Watch this vid of acoustical guitar genius Jon Butler and try not to smile&#8230;I dare you <img
src='http://taylormarsh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p><a
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VAkOhXIsI0" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VAkOhXIsI0</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: texan4hillary</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455712</link> <dc:creator>texan4hillary</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 05:54:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455712</guid> <description>hey wh is really scared. biden now writes op ed in nyt directed at progressives asking for their support. yes now 10 mos into this! please. he also claims dems could have cut a deal with sen chaffee in 1993 and gottenr eform passed. ive never heard of this one. anyone know?  note how biden does not call dean names, says he respects his concerns etc.. hmm biden op ed same day dean on mtp with axe. this has gotta be good.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/20/opinion/20biden.html?_r=2&amp;ref=opinion</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey wh is really scared. biden now writes op ed in nyt directed at progressives asking for their support. yes now 10 mos into this! please. he also claims dems could have cut a deal with sen chaffee in 1993 and gottenr eform passed. ive never heard of this one. anyone know?  note how biden does not call dean names, says he respects his concerns etc.. hmm biden op ed same day dean on mtp with axe. this has gotta be good.<br
/> <a
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/20/opinion/20biden.html?_r=2&#038;ref=opinion" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/20/opinion/20biden.html?_r=2&#038;ref=opinion</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: texan4hillary</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455711</link> <dc:creator>texan4hillary</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 05:44:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455711</guid> <description>lawrence odonnell on dean- he is speaking for at least 12 liberal senators and probbaly 100 plus house dems. he is speaking becuase they are so whip cracked they are unable but u better know dean is doing this bc folks in the sen and house are urging him to. i think that is right. odonnell- also this why scares wh- they know he has folks in congress rooting for him hoping he opens the door to leverage for liberals int he end.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lawrence odonnell on dean- he is speaking for at least 12 liberal senators and probbaly 100 plus house dems. he is speaking becuase they are so whip cracked they are unable but u better know dean is doing this bc folks in the sen and house are urging him to. i think that is right. odonnell- also this why scares wh- they know he has folks in congress rooting for him hoping he opens the door to leverage for liberals int he end.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455706</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 04:06:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455706</guid> <description>Welcome back again to all those of you I&#039;ve missed (not saying I agree with you at all times) - but it is refreshing to read comments reflecting thought, commitment, compassion, and love for our country and world.Thank you for supplying me with more hope.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back again to all those of you I&#8217;ve missed (not saying I agree with you at all times) &#8211; but it is refreshing to read comments reflecting thought, commitment, compassion, and love for our country and world.</p><p>Thank you for supplying me with more hope.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455705</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 04:01:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455705</guid> <description>Hey lynetteWe&#039;re still fighting for change we can believe in aren&#039;t we?  Not with a lot of help from the WH- but perhaps that is the way the people will take back control of our country from the moneyed interests so completely invested in our government.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey lynette</p><p>We&#8217;re still fighting for change we can believe in aren&#8217;t we?  Not with a lot of help from the WH- but perhaps that is the way the people will take back control of our country from the moneyed interests so completely invested in our government.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lynnette</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455702</link> <dc:creator>lynnette</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 02:43:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455702</guid> <description>djjl says:
19 December 2009 at 8:20 pmYou, too, djjl. Hope you have a great holiday.  :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>djjl says:<br
/> 19 December 2009 at 8:20 pm</p><p>You, too, djjl. Hope you have a great holiday. <img
src='http://taylormarsh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455688</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 01:20:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455688</guid> <description>Haven&#039;t had time to comment today; but I&#039;ve seen so many names that I hadn&#039;t seen in a while I just had to stop in to say &quot;hello&quot; and &quot;Happy Holidays.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t had time to comment today; but I&#8217;ve seen so many names that I hadn&#8217;t seen in a while I just had to stop in to say &#8220;hello&#8221; and &#8220;Happy Holidays.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lynnette</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455684</link> <dc:creator>lynnette</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 00:28:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455684</guid> <description>I am going to watch MTP tomorrow. Should be very interesting. I still am glad Dean is speaking out.  I think he is voicing what many are thinking. Maybe because of him, we will get some more change at least. I don&#039;t like the ganging up on him. And Taylor, you have been working overtime, trying to get us the information and dynamics playing out. I very much appreciate it. You&#039;re right - I know I am conflicted about the whole health care bill. I was hoping for more, quite honestly.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to watch MTP tomorrow. Should be very interesting. I still am glad Dean is speaking out.  I think he is voicing what many are thinking. Maybe because of him, we will get some more change at least. I don&#8217;t like the ganging up on him. And Taylor, you have been working overtime, trying to get us the information and dynamics playing out. I very much appreciate it. You&#8217;re right &#8211; I know I am conflicted about the whole health care bill. I was hoping for more, quite honestly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pmichael</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455681</link> <dc:creator>pmichael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:50:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455681</guid> <description>Love your &quot;Where&#039;s Waldo&quot; photo, Taylor. Talk about a test for my monitors (I finally found it) LOL</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love your &#8220;Where&#8217;s Waldo&#8221; photo, Taylor. Talk about a test for my monitors (I finally found it) LOL</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: karmax</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455680</link> <dc:creator>karmax</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:31:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455680</guid> <description>This is disgusting.  The Democrats are NO different than the Repubs and to think how happy I was that they won it ALL, won it all and look what we have here.  There will be no amendments or changes to help any of us, just the healthcare industry totally.  Obama makes me sick.  He just wanted &quot;reform&quot; any way he coud get it.  He could have fought for this.  You think George W. Bush would have put up with this.  He would have sent people to congress and straightened it out.  This guy NEVER cared, just another &quot;first&quot;.  I hope and pray he is one-term.  I will hold my nose and vote Repub or not vote at all, but this grinning, &quot;speech giver&quot; will NEVER get my vote again.  Yes, we can....CHANGE.....right!  He has made a fool out of all of us and still most of you love him.  He is the leader, HE could have done this right.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is disgusting.  The Democrats are NO different than the Repubs and to think how happy I was that they won it ALL, won it all and look what we have here.  There will be no amendments or changes to help any of us, just the healthcare industry totally.  Obama makes me sick.  He just wanted &#8220;reform&#8221; any way he coud get it.  He could have fought for this.  You think George W. Bush would have put up with this.  He would have sent people to congress and straightened it out.  This guy NEVER cared, just another &#8220;first&#8221;.  I hope and pray he is one-term.  I will hold my nose and vote Repub or not vote at all, but this grinning, &#8220;speech giver&#8221; will NEVER get my vote again.  Yes, we can&#8230;.CHANGE&#8230;..right!  He has made a fool out of all of us and still most of you love him.  He is the leader, HE could have done this right.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lake Lady</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455675</link> <dc:creator>Lake Lady</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:21:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455675</guid> <description>IMHO Gregory makes no bones about representing the establishment,and he does it with a big grin on his face.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO Gregory makes no bones about representing the establishment,and he does it with a big grin on his face.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lake Lady</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455674</link> <dc:creator>Lake Lady</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:20:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455674</guid> <description>Well, I&#039;m supposed to be at a Christmas party in a few hours,I better go and get cleaned up. I have been luxuriating in my PJs all day and reading the blogs.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m supposed to be at a Christmas party in a few hours,I better go and get cleaned up. I have been luxuriating in my PJs all day and reading the blogs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taylor Marsh</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455672</link> <dc:creator>Taylor Marsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:17:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455672</guid> <description>Yep, it sure will be interesting. Access and establishment linked.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, it sure will be interesting. Access and establishment linked.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lake Lady</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455671</link> <dc:creator>Lake Lady</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:15:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455671</guid> <description>He has helped the final bill so far. I hope he keeps going maybe he can make some more improvements.Tomorrow should be interesting on MTP. Axelrod better get a good nights sleep tonight because he has been looking kind of sick lately.David Gregory will probably do everything he can to help him but Dean is sharp and no coward.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He has helped the final bill so far. I hope he keeps going maybe he can make some more improvements.Tomorrow should be interesting on MTP. Axelrod better get a good nights sleep tonight because he has been looking kind of sick lately.David Gregory will probably do everything he can to help him but Dean is sharp and no coward.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taylor Marsh</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455668</link> <dc:creator>Taylor Marsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:02:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455668</guid> <description>Lake Lady says:
19 December 2009 at 4:51 pmThat annual cap was horrendous, LL. Dean&#039;s blown this whole thing wide open, with things moving at least.Daryl24, Dean meant the bill as it was shouldn&#039;t have been supported and he would have voted against it. He also said he believed Dems should keep working on the bill to make it better, not &quot;kill the bill,&quot; as in kill health care reform. The trouble is that this bill sucks. Deans 1st choice is to start over and go thru reconciliation, but he won&#039;t get that.Let&#039;s also remember that Dean&#039;s a doctor who has also implemented health care in Vermont. Kerry and others are circling the wagons, which is their job, but the incoming @ Dean is targeting the wrong person. But then they can&#039;t go after the boss.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lake Lady says:<br
/> 19 December 2009 at 4:51 pm</p><p>That annual cap was horrendous, LL. Dean&#8217;s blown this whole thing wide open, with things moving at least.</p><p>Daryl24, Dean meant the bill as it was shouldn&#8217;t have been supported and he would have voted against it. He also said he believed Dems should keep working on the bill to make it better, not &#8220;kill the bill,&#8221; as in kill health care reform. The trouble is that this bill sucks. Deans 1st choice is to start over and go thru reconciliation, but he won&#8217;t get that.</p><p>Let&#8217;s also remember that Dean&#8217;s a doctor who has also implemented health care in Vermont. Kerry and others are circling the wagons, which is their job, but the incoming @ Dean is targeting the wrong person. But then they can&#8217;t go after the boss.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lake Lady</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455664</link> <dc:creator>Lake Lady</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:51:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455664</guid> <description>They have also changed the annual cap language it is no longer vague. There will be no lifetime or annual caps period. That was one of Dean&#039;s strong objections.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have also changed the annual cap language it is no longer vague. There will be no lifetime or annual caps period. That was one of Dean&#8217;s strong objections.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lake Lady</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455663</link> <dc:creator>Lake Lady</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:49:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455663</guid> <description>Hey Darly24~ :)Buckhill...I think I read in the CBO write up on the managers admendments that couples making more than $250K and individuals making more than $200K will be paying higher payroll taxes.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Darly24~ <img
src='http://taylormarsh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Buckhill&#8230;I think I read in the CBO write up on the managers admendments that couples making more than $250K and individuals making more than $200K will be paying higher payroll taxes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taylor Marsh</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455660</link> <dc:creator>Taylor Marsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:25:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455660</guid> <description>kris says:
19 December 2009 at 12:02 pm&lt;i&gt;I am surprised at your willingness to accept the compromise on abortion Taylor, but everyone seemingly is giving up their principles these days.&lt;/i&gt;That is just insulting, kris, and I do not appreciate it. I am not in the position to bargain squat. The bargaining began with Nancy Pelosi, and I&#039;ve been fighting and pushing all along. I didn&#039;t make this deal, nor did I decide not to do reconciliation. I also have not said I will support the bill yet.Perhaps you and others will be happier, kris, if Stupak&#039;s deal with McConnell &amp; the Republicans in conference goes through and we get worse?Honestly. No one could be working harder than myself to write on the dynamics playing out. The people who chime in here are conflicted, as they have every right to be, talking out their hopes of having some health care changes. Last time I looked, kris, you weren&#039;t so dogmatic or judgmental about people who care a lot about these things. It&#039;s really unfortunate and even unfair.BuckHill says:
19 December 2009 at 3:16 pm  (Edit)&lt;i&gt;With all due respect the bill in its current form should be voted down.&lt;/i&gt;That&#039;s where I still stand, BuckHill, as I understand the bill right now, but it&#039;s unlikely to happen. The mandates without competition are horrible, so if that remains, well... In the end, whatever comes out is going to be bad politically, as well as in policy prescription.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kris says:<br
/> 19 December 2009 at 12:02 pm</p><p><i>I am surprised at your willingness to accept the compromise on abortion Taylor, but everyone seemingly is giving up their principles these days.</i></p><p>That is just insulting, kris, and I do not appreciate it. I am not in the position to bargain squat. The bargaining began with Nancy Pelosi, and I&#8217;ve been fighting and pushing all along. I didn&#8217;t make this deal, nor did I decide not to do reconciliation. I also have not said I will support the bill yet.</p><p>Perhaps you and others will be happier, kris, if Stupak&#8217;s deal with McConnell &#038; the Republicans in conference goes through and we get worse?</p><p>Honestly. No one could be working harder than myself to write on the dynamics playing out. The people who chime in here are conflicted, as they have every right to be, talking out their hopes of having some health care changes. Last time I looked, kris, you weren&#8217;t so dogmatic or judgmental about people who care a lot about these things. It&#8217;s really unfortunate and even unfair.</p><p>BuckHill says:<br
/> 19 December 2009 at 3:16 pm  (Edit)</p><p><i>With all due respect the bill in its current form should be voted down.</i></p><p>That&#8217;s where I still stand, BuckHill, as I understand the bill right now, but it&#8217;s unlikely to happen. The mandates without competition are horrible, so if that remains, well&#8230; In the end, whatever comes out is going to be bad politically, as well as in policy prescription.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Daryl24</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455651</link> <dc:creator>Daryl24</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:31:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455651</guid> <description>lynnetteAny of them can on any bill. If Lieberman and Nelson had been on board from the beginning then we might still be dealing with Bayh and some other senator. Because for whatever reason that&#039;s how they roll.It ain&#039;t easy and the process is nerve wracking but we&#039;re further along on this issue than ever before.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lynnette</p><p>Any of them can on any bill. If Lieberman and Nelson had been on board from the beginning then we might still be dealing with Bayh and some other senator. Because for whatever reason that&#8217;s how they roll.</p><p>It ain&#8217;t easy and the process is nerve wracking but we&#8217;re further along on this issue than ever before.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lynnette</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455650</link> <dc:creator>lynnette</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:22:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455650</guid> <description>Daryl24 says:
19 December 2009 at 3:10 pmI so hope Rockefeller is right. If that is the case, I wouldn&#039;t mind but I have my doubts, watching the process on this bill. I still am peeved that Lieberman and Nelson could hijack the policy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daryl24 says:<br
/> 19 December 2009 at 3:10 pm</p><p>I so hope Rockefeller is right. If that is the case, I wouldn&#8217;t mind but I have my doubts, watching the process on this bill. I still am peeved that Lieberman and Nelson could hijack the policy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Daryl24</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/ben-nelson-gets-his-lieberman/comment-page-1/#comment-455649</link> <dc:creator>Daryl24</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:19:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46238#comment-455649</guid> <description>Hi Lady Lake:&quot;Kerry continues to disappoint.&quot;Jay Rockerfeller did it also. So did Mary Landrieu. I think they had to.You can&#039;t really have the former head of the Democratic National Committee going on national tv and say kill the bill as his team is trying to cross the goal line. I just don&#039;t think that&#039;s a good idea.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lady Lake:</p><p>&#8220;Kerry continues to disappoint.&#8221;</p><p>Jay Rockerfeller did it also. So did Mary Landrieu. I think they had to.</p><p>You can&#8217;t really have the former head of the Democratic National Committee going on national tv and say kill the bill as his team is trying to cross the goal line. I just don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s a good idea.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 1293/1387 objects using memcached

Served from: taylormarsh.com @ 2012-02-10 09:34:53 -->
