<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Dylan Ratigan Previews 2010</title> <atom:link href="http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/</link> <description>Taylor Marsh - News, Political Analysis, Foreign Policy, and  Independent Political Opinion on Progressive Politics</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: morris1030</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455713</link> <dc:creator>morris1030</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 05:57:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455713</guid> <description>However MoveOn has been late to the party as Obamabots from the early days when they threw Hillary under the bus.It&#039;s been months [July] since Obama cut his deal with devil BigPharma&#039;s lobbist Billy Tauzin in the back rooms.  Remember Obama promising C-Span would carry all important details of HC process so we could all participate? Transparency?Progressives have watched Obama wimp out for a year on everything from Wall Street, Banks, Afghanistan, Healthcare and Drugs without objection.  Until now I&#039;m beginning to hear awareness and anger in the left wing blogs that were  all in the tank for Obama.I do hope this awareness morphs into political payback and hold Team Obama accountable.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However MoveOn has been late to the party as Obamabots from the early days when they threw Hillary under the bus.</p><p>It&#8217;s been months [July] since Obama cut his deal with devil BigPharma&#8217;s lobbist Billy Tauzin in the back rooms.  Remember Obama promising C-Span would carry all important details of HC process so we could all participate? Transparency?</p><p>Progressives have watched Obama wimp out for a year on everything from Wall Street, Banks, Afghanistan, Healthcare and Drugs without objection.  Until now I&#8217;m beginning to hear awareness and anger in the left wing blogs that were  all in the tank for Obama.</p><p>I do hope this awareness morphs into political payback and hold Team Obama accountable.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455626</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:49:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455626</guid> <description>Noogan
Thanks for the link - I found De Fazio delightfully and hopefully refreshing.As far as Obama &quot;Don&#039;t think we’re not keeping score, brother,” - President Obama may find that the Democratic and independent voters are also keeping score.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noogan<br
/> Thanks for the link &#8211; I found De Fazio delightfully and hopefully refreshing.</p><p>As far as Obama &#8220;Don&#8217;t think we’re not keeping score, brother,” &#8211; President Obama may find that the Democratic and independent voters are also keeping score.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Noogan</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455596</link> <dc:creator>Noogan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455596</guid> <description>This is so disturbing on so many levels:“Don’t think we’re not keeping score, brother,” Obama told DeFazio during a closed-door meeting of the House Democratic Caucus, according to members afterward.http://thehill.com/homenews/house/72889-pelosi-rahm-do-not-scare-rep-defazio</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so disturbing on so many levels:</p><p>“Don’t think we’re not keeping score, brother,” Obama told DeFazio during a closed-door meeting of the House Democratic Caucus, according to members afterward.</p><p><a
href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/72889-pelosi-rahm-do-not-scare-rep-defazio" rel="nofollow">http://thehill.com/homenews/house/72889-pelosi-rahm-do-not-scare-rep-defazio</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lynnette</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455594</link> <dc:creator>lynnette</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:29:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455594</guid> <description>JoeBeets says:
18 December 2009 at 2:33 pmdjjl says:
18 December 2009 at 7:51 pmI agree. Ratigan should have given her a chance to speak, IMO, otherwise, why have her on? And yes, Wasserman-Schultz does appear to be making excuses for this shabby bill.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JoeBeets says:<br
/> 18 December 2009 at 2:33 pm</p><p>djjl says:<br
/> 18 December 2009 at 7:51 pm</p><p>I agree. Ratigan should have given her a chance to speak, IMO, otherwise, why have her on? And yes, Wasserman-Schultz does appear to be making excuses for this shabby bill.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455512</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:36:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455512</guid> <description>t4h
Right on!Remember how quickly Crawford was &quot;dismissed&quot; from Tweety and company when he wasn&#039;t appropriately slovenly in bowing to Obamamania?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>t4h<br
/> Right on!</p><p>Remember how quickly Crawford was &#8220;dismissed&#8221; from Tweety and company when he wasn&#8217;t appropriately slovenly in bowing to Obamamania?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455511</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:31:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455511</guid> <description>My, my,  just where do we begin to thank President Obama for what he has given:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/It&#039;s only the price to pay for a preening peacock accustomed to the easy way.How many of you recall reading in 2007 that one of the reasons he chose Chicago was because Chicago had a history of being good to black politicians.  Naaawhhh, naawwhhh, naaawhh  pastor of similarly (imo) a similarly considered choice.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My, my,  just where do we begin to thank President Obama for what he has given:</p><p><a
href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/</a></p><p>It&#8217;s only the price to pay for a preening peacock accustomed to the easy way.</p><p>How many of you recall reading in 2007 that one of the reasons he chose Chicago was because Chicago had a history of being good to black politicians.  Naaawhhh, naawwhhh, naaawhh  pastor of similarly (imo) a similarly considered choice.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: texan4hillary</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455509</link> <dc:creator>texan4hillary</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:26:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455509</guid> <description>craig crawford: the democrats need to have the audacity to be democrats. hope aint enough!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>craig crawford: the democrats need to have the audacity to be democrats. hope aint enough!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455508</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:22:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455508</guid> <description>I&#039;ve long read Plato.  You need to quit trying to puff up - it&#039;s really not becoming.  Quite familiar with the allegory of the cave.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve long read Plato.  You need to quit trying to puff up &#8211; it&#8217;s really not becoming.  Quite familiar with the allegory of the cave.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taylor Marsh</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455507</link> <dc:creator>Taylor Marsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:17:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455507</guid> <description>sheanabana says:
18 December 2009 at 6:30 pmThat&#039;s really something and I bet it wasn&#039;t easy to do.Let&#039;s keep working to get something, anything changed, and a better bill.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sheanabana says:<br
/> 18 December 2009 at 6:30 pm</p><p>That&#8217;s really something and I bet it wasn&#8217;t easy to do.</p><p>Let&#8217;s keep working to get something, anything changed, and a better bill.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Imhotep</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455505</link> <dc:creator>Imhotep</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:08:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455505</guid> <description>djjl, actually the jokes on you.  Do you really believe that what you see is what you get?  Have you ever read Plato&#039;s Allegory of the Cave?  Yeah, I know, nobody reads Plato anymore.  But, do yourself a favor and read his Allegory if you haven&#039;t.  It&#039;s pretty short.  Peace</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>djjl, actually the jokes on you.  Do you really believe that what you see is what you get?  Have you ever read Plato&#8217;s Allegory of the Cave?  Yeah, I know, nobody reads Plato anymore.  But, do yourself a favor and read his Allegory if you haven&#8217;t.  It&#8217;s pretty short.  Peace</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455501</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:51:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455501</guid> <description>&quot;Did anyone see this on MSNBC? Dylan Rattigan acted really disrespectfully to Cong. Debbie Wasserman-Shultz.&quot;Obamaphilia on display.  What&#039;s it say when Obama matters more than the nation and it&#039;s citizens to some of those who worked hard to put him in the WH?  Is it that we should all realize that Obama is what is really important and not the people of the country.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Did anyone see this on MSNBC? Dylan Rattigan acted really disrespectfully to Cong. Debbie Wasserman-Shultz.&#8221;</p><p>Obamaphilia on display.  What&#8217;s it say when Obama matters more than the nation and it&#8217;s citizens to some of those who worked hard to put him in the WH?  Is it that we should all realize that Obama is what is really important and not the people of the country.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455500</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:44:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455500</guid> <description>Where never is heard a discouraging word
and the skys are not cloudy all day.............Thanks to Obama, or is that thanks to his blogs who continue to refuse to at least allow him to be responsible for what HE DOES.Let&#039;s watch tweety, Olberman,  and all the Obama allegiants............What a sorry mess Obama and HIS allegiants have foisted upon the world - all to elect the Prom King.You should hang your heads in shame.  Shame, shame , shame.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where never is heard a discouraging word<br
/> and the skys are not cloudy all day&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p><p>Thanks to Obama, or is that thanks to his blogs who continue to refuse to at least allow him to be responsible for what HE DOES.</p><p>Let&#8217;s watch tweety, Olberman,  and all the Obama allegiants&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p><p>What a sorry mess Obama and HIS allegiants have foisted upon the world &#8211; all to elect the Prom King.</p><p>You should hang your heads in shame.  Shame, shame , shame.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455496</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:20:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455496</guid> <description>Wow - justs says it all - how far can it go before Hillary is brought in .  You do know that it is ALL Hillary.  She as not agreed , by her position as SOS, to act on behalf of the elected POTUS.  Nope, she&#039;s the evil wicked one who is pulling the changes.What a supreme and ridiculous joke.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; justs says it all &#8211; how far can it go before Hillary is brought in .  You do know that it is ALL Hillary.  She as not agreed , by her position as SOS, to act on behalf of the elected POTUS.  Nope, she&#8217;s the evil wicked one who is pulling the changes.</p><p>What a supreme and ridiculous joke.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Imhotep</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455494</link> <dc:creator>Imhotep</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:11:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455494</guid> <description>Taylor, that was an essay that I am in full agreement with.  Now, if you would come around on the Afghanistan issue by breaking with Hillary, you and I would be simpatico.   Peace</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taylor, that was an essay that I am in full agreement with.  Now, if you would come around on the Afghanistan issue by breaking with Hillary, you and I would be simpatico.   Peace</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: www.democratz.org</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455493</link> <dc:creator>www.democratz.org</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:54:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455493</guid> <description>Politicians mainly understand money so while progressives wail I tell people to go after the moneyhttp://bit.ly/traitorjoehttp://bit.ly/public_optionhttp://bit.ly/drug_benefit</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politicians mainly understand money so while progressives wail I tell people to go after the money</p><p><a
href="http://bit.ly/traitorjoe" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/traitorjoe</a></p><p><a
href="http://bit.ly/public_option" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/public_option</a></p><p><a
href="http://bit.ly/drug_benefit" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/drug_benefit</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kris</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455492</link> <dc:creator>kris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:33:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455492</guid> <description>Kanzeon is correct about mandates. It was the basis of Hillary Clinton&#039;s healthcare reform plan. She was for them, Obama against. But then again those for universal coverage, or a single payer system did not have a friend with Obama. The surprising thing is the current proposed legislation contains MINUS a public option.Mandates are the only way to insure a large pool of payers, again as Kanzeon stated. It&#039;s basic.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kanzeon is correct about mandates. It was the basis of Hillary Clinton&#8217;s healthcare reform plan. She was for them, Obama against. But then again those for universal coverage, or a single payer system did not have a friend with Obama. The surprising thing is the current proposed legislation contains MINUS a public option.</p><p>Mandates are the only way to insure a large pool of payers, again as Kanzeon stated. It&#8217;s basic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sheanabana</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455491</link> <dc:creator>sheanabana</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:30:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455491</guid> <description>i just sent a request to be taken off the OFA email list.  when asked why simply put, &quot;he turned his back on us, he can do this one himself&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just sent a request to be taken off the OFA email list.  when asked why simply put, &#8220;he turned his back on us, he can do this one himself&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: texan4hillary</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455490</link> <dc:creator>texan4hillary</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:27:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455490</guid> <description>58pct americans oppose being forced to buy private insurance unless emdcare or pub is there. taylor is witht he majority. and u bet the gop will run on undoing the mandates.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>58pct americans oppose being forced to buy private insurance unless emdcare or pub is there. taylor is witht he majority. and u bet the gop will run on undoing the mandates.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: texan4hillary</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455489</link> <dc:creator>texan4hillary</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:26:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455489</guid> <description>moveon joins the fight with dean to fight mandating people to buy crooked insurance. sign their petition here:
http://pol.moveon.org/block/?r_by=18359-4534745-pGuOEhx&amp;rc=comment_paste</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>moveon joins the fight with dean to fight mandating people to buy crooked insurance. sign their petition here:<br
/> <a
href="http://pol.moveon.org/block/?r_by=18359-4534745-pGuOEhx&#038;rc=comment_paste" rel="nofollow">http://pol.moveon.org/block/?r_by=18359-4534745-pGuOEhx&#038;rc=comment_paste</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kanzeon</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455487</link> <dc:creator>Kanzeon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:44:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455487</guid> <description>Maybe you should take a moment, Taylor.You&#039;ve just heaped praise on a irrational ranting bully, who put in a performance that would have done Bill O&#039;Reilly proud.  Then you&#039;ve proclaimed that the straighforward comments of a Nobel Prize winning economist are signs he has lost his mind.You aren&#039;t scoring any credibility points.Those times when you went without insurance, wouldn&#039;t you have preferred to purchase it with a subsidy?  The mandate is almost irrelevant - most of us purchase it out of need and a sense of responsibility, thought the cost may be exorbitant.  Do you recognize that it is foolish and irresponsible to go without insurance, and that the only way for any system to work - public or private - is to have everyone pay into it at all times, because it is a basic need.Getting upset over the mandate is childish, and has been ever since Obama opposed it in the primary.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you should take a moment, Taylor.</p><p>You&#8217;ve just heaped praise on a irrational ranting bully, who put in a performance that would have done Bill O&#8217;Reilly proud.  Then you&#8217;ve proclaimed that the straighforward comments of a Nobel Prize winning economist are signs he has lost his mind.</p><p>You aren&#8217;t scoring any credibility points.</p><p>Those times when you went without insurance, wouldn&#8217;t you have preferred to purchase it with a subsidy?  The mandate is almost irrelevant &#8211; most of us purchase it out of need and a sense of responsibility, thought the cost may be exorbitant.  Do you recognize that it is foolish and irresponsible to go without insurance, and that the only way for any system to work &#8211; public or private &#8211; is to have everyone pay into it at all times, because it is a basic need.</p><p>Getting upset over the mandate is childish, and has been ever since Obama opposed it in the primary.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kris</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455486</link> <dc:creator>kris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:41:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455486</guid> <description>If you are holding your breath you can stop now. It wasn&#039;t worth it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are holding your breath you can stop now. It wasn&#8217;t worth it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kris</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455485</link> <dc:creator>kris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455485</guid> <description>Sorry, are we...not our we.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, are we&#8230;not our we.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kris</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455484</link> <dc:creator>kris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:25:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455484</guid> <description>Our we all holding our breath for the announcement of a NON-BINDING climate agreement?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our we all holding our breath for the announcement of a NON-BINDING climate agreement?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: texan4hillary</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455483</link> <dc:creator>texan4hillary</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:38:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455483</guid> <description>voter revolt- only 33pct back sen bill w/mandates. 58 pct back it if it has pub opt and or medicare 55. when will our leaders get it
Voters Revolt: Only 33% Support for New Senate Health Care Bill
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/12/18/114114/55</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>voter revolt- only 33pct back sen bill w/mandates. 58 pct back it if it has pub opt and or medicare 55. when will our leaders get it<br
/> Voters Revolt: Only 33% Support for New Senate Health Care Bill<br
/> <a
href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/12/18/114114/55" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/12/18/114114/55</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JoeBeets</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455482</link> <dc:creator>JoeBeets</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:37:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455482</guid> <description>Taylor, I hear you about your libertarian side taking over. After watching the majority Democratic Senate do its thing on the HC bill, I am ready to grab my pitchfork and head to DC.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taylor, I hear you about your libertarian side taking over. After watching the majority Democratic Senate do its thing on the HC bill, I am ready to grab my pitchfork and head to DC.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JoeBeets</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455481</link> <dc:creator>JoeBeets</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:33:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455481</guid> <description>I just watched the clip and Mr. Ratigan was actually pretty rude. He asked how a bill with a mandate, but no cost controls would be good for Americans. Rep. Wasserman-Schultz started to answer (albeit in talking points) and Mr. Ratigan changed the question in mid-sentence to why are the stocks going up. She is obviously not a stock analyst and that was not why he had her on to ask her questions.Talkshow hosts should let their guest answer the question asked, perhaps cutting them off after they make their main point, and then ask ANOTHER probing question. Talking over each other is not productive. He should have let her make her point about how this changes the whole insurance landscape, yada yada, and THEN blasted her with his take and another question.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just watched the clip and Mr. Ratigan was actually pretty rude. He asked how a bill with a mandate, but no cost controls would be good for Americans. Rep. Wasserman-Schultz started to answer (albeit in talking points) and Mr. Ratigan changed the question in mid-sentence to why are the stocks going up. She is obviously not a stock analyst and that was not why he had her on to ask her questions.</p><p>Talkshow hosts should let their guest answer the question asked, perhaps cutting them off after they make their main point, and then ask ANOTHER probing question. Talking over each other is not productive. He should have let her make her point about how this changes the whole insurance landscape, yada yada, and THEN blasted her with his take and another question.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taylor Marsh</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455480</link> <dc:creator>Taylor Marsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:22:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455480</guid> <description>I know, StephenAG!Ratigan is demystifying economics while linking it to politics at a time when our corpocracy is ripe for muckrakers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, StephenAG!</p><p>Ratigan is demystifying economics while linking it to politics at a time when our corpocracy is ripe for muckrakers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GaBuck</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455479</link> <dc:creator>GaBuck</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:22:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455479</guid> <description>Great video.Just wish he was asking Obama, Axelrod, or hell, Paul Krugman the same question.Truth is, most Americans are smart enough to look at stock trends like he showed and realize the fix is in.The noise is only going to get louder</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great video.</p><p>Just wish he was asking Obama, Axelrod, or hell, Paul Krugman the same question.</p><p>Truth is, most Americans are smart enough to look at stock trends like he showed and realize the fix is in.</p><p>The noise is only going to get louder</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: StephenAG</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455478</link> <dc:creator>StephenAG</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:20:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455478</guid> <description>Wow. OMG! Taylor and djjl, that was a truly tragic scene. As hard as Wasserman-Schultz and others try to sell this mess, I keep coming back to one main point:&quot;HCR&quot; can&#039;t be sold because the leadership doesn&#039;t really believe in it.  It is very hard to sell something that you do not value or are not passionate about at some level. Throwing out the Clinton card only gets you Change We Can NO LONGER Believe in. The Obama Administration needs to show that it is passionate about more than showing the hippees who&#039;s the boss.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. OMG! Taylor and djjl, that was a truly tragic scene. As hard as Wasserman-Schultz and others try to sell this mess, I keep coming back to one main point:</p><p>&#8220;HCR&#8221; can&#8217;t be sold because the leadership doesn&#8217;t really believe in it.  It is very hard to sell something that you do not value or are not passionate about at some level. Throwing out the Clinton card only gets you Change We Can NO LONGER Believe in. The Obama Administration needs to show that it is passionate about more than showing the hippees who&#8217;s the boss.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: whitepaw</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2009/12/dylan-ratigan-previews-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-455477</link> <dc:creator>whitepaw</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:20:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=46177#comment-455477</guid> <description>I LOVE Dylan Ratigan...  He definitely gets excited but there is no question that he fully believes in his causes.  Dylan should run for office!  To think I didn&#039;t like him at first.This has NOTHING to do with anything... but such a sexy beast he is too!  And his principled stands make him all the more attractive.. :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE Dylan Ratigan&#8230;  He definitely gets excited but there is no question that he fully believes in his causes.  Dylan should run for office!  To think I didn&#8217;t like him at first.</p><p>This has NOTHING to do with anything&#8230; but such a sexy beast he is too!  And his principled stands make him all the more attractive.. <img
src='http://taylormarsh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/64 queries in 0.084 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 1281/1375 objects using memcached

Served from: taylormarsh.com @ 2012-02-10 09:08:33 -->
