<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Critical Mass</title> <atom:link href="http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/</link> <description>Taylor Marsh - News, Political Analysis, Foreign Policy, and  Independent Political Opinion on Progressive Politics</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:42:40 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ramsgate</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458902</link> <dc:creator>Ramsgate</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:48:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458902</guid> <description>BluePuppy says:
19 January 2010 at 1:22 pm&quot;I’m not going to get into a semantic battle over what is socialism and what is not socialism.&quot;Long day.
I see I&#039;m not going to get any details. I thought so.
Oh well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BluePuppy says:<br
/> 19 January 2010 at 1:22 pm</p><p>&#8220;I’m not going to get into a semantic battle over what is socialism and what is not socialism.&#8221;</p><p>Long day.<br
/> I see I&#8217;m not going to get any details. I thought so.<br
/> Oh well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ogenec</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458900</link> <dc:creator>ogenec</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:45:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458900</guid> <description>Hey, psychodrew, if it&#039;s any consolation, the public option papa agrees with you: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/19/AR2010011902846.html?hpid=opinionsbox1</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, psychodrew, if it&#8217;s any consolation, the public option papa agrees with you: <a
href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/19/AR2010011902846.html?hpid=opinionsbox1" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/19/AR2010011902846.html?hpid=opinionsbox1</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458895</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:02:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458895</guid> <description>psychodrew
I luv ya - but there ia a person elected to lead the US and is head of the Democratic Party - POTUS.  Congress did all but beg him publicly for direction - Obama apparently got what he wanted - other than a date to the Prom with a Republican.  He&#039;s the one that wasted efforts on bi-partisanship - a la dancing with the Repulbicans.  IT surely wasn&#039;t Reids idea.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>psychodrew<br
/> I luv ya &#8211; but there ia a person elected to lead the US and is head of the Democratic Party &#8211; POTUS.  Congress did all but beg him publicly for direction &#8211; Obama apparently got what he wanted &#8211; other than a date to the Prom with a Republican.  He&#8217;s the one that wasted efforts on bi-partisanship &#8211; a la dancing with the Repulbicans.  IT surely wasn&#8217;t Reids idea.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: psychodrew</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458894</link> <dc:creator>psychodrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:45:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458894</guid> <description>I don&#039;t think we&#039;ve had the best leadership, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s been that bad.  I put a lot of the blame on Harry Reid and Max Baucus.  They both made this process go much longer than it needed to.  Max Baucus wasted too much time on bipartisan talks that were never going to work and Harry Reid wasted too much time on a public option that he knew he never had the votes for.  They drug this out way longer than needed.  I am by no means of the imagination an Obamabot, but I think he&#039;s been an effective president and he&#039;s done pretty well on HCR.Polling on HCR hasn&#039;t really changed since November, when Coakley was 30 points up in the poll.  Obama hasn&#039;t fallen much either.  He fell below 50% and started hovering around the number a while ago.  I think there is a general dissatisfaction and desire to throw out anybody associated with the establishment.  Congress is polling poorly, but Republicans have higher negatives/lower positives than Democrats.  And the majority of Americans blame Bush for the current economic crisis.If we had been able to get HCR behind us in the fall, we would be talking about winning issues for us--jobs, the economy, and Wall Street reform.  Instead, we have spent the last six months fighting about who is going to come out on top and blaming each other for not getting what we wanted.  This has been drug out so long, that the American people are sick of it.  They&#039;re tired of hearing about it.  I&#039;m freaking tired of hearing about it and I support the president on this.  They want to hear about jobs, Wall Street, other things.  All they see on the news is bad economic news and all they hear from Washington is public option this and Cadillac tax that.  The only coherent message they&#039;re getting is from the teabaggers who say that we want raise taxes and take over their health care.We need to get the damn bill passed, get it behind us, and move on.  If Democrats can&#039;t do that, they we don&#039;t deserve to win elections.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ve had the best leadership, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s been that bad.  I put a lot of the blame on Harry Reid and Max Baucus.  They both made this process go much longer than it needed to.  Max Baucus wasted too much time on bipartisan talks that were never going to work and Harry Reid wasted too much time on a public option that he knew he never had the votes for.  They drug this out way longer than needed.  I am by no means of the imagination an Obamabot, but I think he&#8217;s been an effective president and he&#8217;s done pretty well on HCR.</p><p>Polling on HCR hasn&#8217;t really changed since November, when Coakley was 30 points up in the poll.  Obama hasn&#8217;t fallen much either.  He fell below 50% and started hovering around the number a while ago.  I think there is a general dissatisfaction and desire to throw out anybody associated with the establishment.  Congress is polling poorly, but Republicans have higher negatives/lower positives than Democrats.  And the majority of Americans blame Bush for the current economic crisis.</p><p>If we had been able to get HCR behind us in the fall, we would be talking about winning issues for us&#8211;jobs, the economy, and Wall Street reform.  Instead, we have spent the last six months fighting about who is going to come out on top and blaming each other for not getting what we wanted.  This has been drug out so long, that the American people are sick of it.  They&#8217;re tired of hearing about it.  I&#8217;m freaking tired of hearing about it and I support the president on this.  They want to hear about jobs, Wall Street, other things.  All they see on the news is bad economic news and all they hear from Washington is public option this and Cadillac tax that.  The only coherent message they&#8217;re getting is from the teabaggers who say that we want raise taxes and take over their health care.</p><p>We need to get the damn bill passed, get it behind us, and move on.  If Democrats can&#8217;t do that, they we don&#8217;t deserve to win elections.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458893</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:38:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458893</guid> <description>The point is, i think, that don&#039;t care about the TRUTH when they&#039;ve got same tale to carry their lies aboard.As my husband and I visited our friend in Pa on our emergency Christmas week trip - we saw the Insurance Company death panels in place and at work.  Real ones - not Sarah&#039;s fantasy political work - the same one&#039;s who&#039;ve been saying who got care and who didn&#039;t for years - the insurance company&#039;s.  Just think - your employer, because they typically pick your insurance company,  also has a say in how you and your family will be cared for in good and poor health.  How&#039;s that make ya&#039; feel.  That CEO needs to watch that line when it comes to bonus time.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is, i think, that don&#8217;t care about the TRUTH when they&#8217;ve got same tale to carry their lies aboard.</p><p>As my husband and I visited our friend in Pa on our emergency Christmas week trip &#8211; we saw the Insurance Company death panels in place and at work.  Real ones &#8211; not Sarah&#8217;s fantasy political work &#8211; the same one&#8217;s who&#8217;ve been saying who got care and who didn&#8217;t for years &#8211; the insurance company&#8217;s.  Just think &#8211; your employer, because they typically pick your insurance company,  also has a say in how you and your family will be cared for in good and poor health.  How&#8217;s that make ya&#8217; feel.  That CEO needs to watch that line when it comes to bonus time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taylor Marsh</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458891</link> <dc:creator>Taylor Marsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:04:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458891</guid> <description>djjl says:
19 January 2010 at 1:41 pmIt&#039;s the right-wing theme that reinforces political warfare: truth has nothing to do with it; if the perception sticks, use it, aka Sarah Palin&#039;s &quot;death panels, which was an outright lie, but it fit into people&#039;s hysterical fears, something the right knows how to do very well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>djjl says:<br
/> 19 January 2010 at 1:41 pm</p><p>It&#8217;s the right-wing theme that reinforces political warfare: truth has nothing to do with it; if the perception sticks, use it, aka Sarah Palin&#8217;s &#8220;death panels, which was an outright lie, but it fit into people&#8217;s hysterical fears, something the right knows how to do very well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taylor Marsh</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458890</link> <dc:creator>Taylor Marsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:00:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458890</guid> <description>Heya all. Appreciate the kind words, BC30, Blue27, BluePuppy, alinosof and others, including all the lurkers I&#039;m hearing from daily. I&#039;m hoping the dozens of new people registering around here will eventually come on in.Maybe the disagreements will inspire serious challenges around here instead of comfy name calling, because *everyone* is welcome. Debate is hard to have when everyone agrees. It&#039;s also boring.If we can all keep it on issues, even with using snark and rhetorical slaps, respecting what others believe regardless of our disagreements, the discussions will be a lot more interesting going forward.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heya all. Appreciate the kind words, BC30, Blue27, BluePuppy, alinosof and others, including all the lurkers I&#8217;m hearing from daily. I&#8217;m hoping the dozens of new people registering around here will eventually come on in.</p><p>Maybe the disagreements will inspire serious challenges around here instead of comfy name calling, because *everyone* is welcome. Debate is hard to have when everyone agrees. It&#8217;s also boring.</p><p>If we can all keep it on issues, even with using snark and rhetorical slaps, respecting what others believe regardless of our disagreements, the discussions will be a lot more interesting going forward.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: secularhumanizinevoluter</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458883</link> <dc:creator>secularhumanizinevoluter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:35:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458883</guid> <description>&quot;Don Bacon says:
19 January 2010 at 1:43 pm
Secular, I even include you in my roster of those who should be listened to.&quot;Awww shucks...ya meanz it?!!!!
I&#039;m all blushin an stuff!By the by, several sources are reporting heavy turn out early.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Don Bacon says:<br
/> 19 January 2010 at 1:43 pm<br
/> Secular, I even include you in my roster of those who should be listened to.&#8221;</p><p>Awww shucks&#8230;ya meanz it?!!!!<br
/> I&#8217;m all blushin an stuff!</p><p>By the by, several sources are reporting heavy turn out early.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458881</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:27:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458881</guid> <description>Blue Puppy
Your problem with the meaning of socialism has nothing to do with semantics.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blue Puppy<br
/> Your problem with the meaning of socialism has nothing to do with semantics.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458879</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:53:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458879</guid> <description>But then neither did Obama - who should have been acutely aware of civil rights discrimination based on thinks like color, gender, etc</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But then neither did Obama &#8211; who should have been acutely aware of civil rights discrimination based on thinks like color, gender, etc</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458878</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:46:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458878</guid> <description>LAke Lady
No, he never uttered a word.  Maybe he doesn&#039;t have cable either.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LAke Lady<br
/> No, he never uttered a word.  Maybe he doesn&#8217;t have cable either.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458877</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:43:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458877</guid> <description>Maybe Taylor should post a dictionary so folks could easily see what the meaning of some of the words being bandied about really are - like totalitarian and socialism for a start.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Taylor should post a dictionary so folks could easily see what the meaning of some of the words being bandied about really are &#8211; like totalitarian and socialism for a start.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Don Bacon</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458876</link> <dc:creator>Don Bacon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:43:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458876</guid> <description>Secular, I even include you in my roster of those who should be listened to.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Secular, I even include you in my roster of those who should be listened to.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: daubry</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458875</link> <dc:creator>daubry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:43:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458875</guid> <description>No clue djjlNot much can be said..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No clue djjl</p><p>Not much can be said..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458874</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:41:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458874</guid> <description>What can be said when people refer to Obama&#039;s meager &quot;effort&quot; to reign in the continued rape of this country by the health care industrial complex as socialist?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can be said when people refer to Obama&#8217;s meager &#8220;effort&#8221; to reign in the continued rape of this country by the health care industrial complex as socialist?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: daubry</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458873</link> <dc:creator>daubry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:36:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458873</guid> <description>&quot;I’m not going to get into a semantic battle over what is socialism and what is not socialism.&quot;Of course not. It would mean having to explain why you&#039;re screaming &quot;Socialism!&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m not going to get into a semantic battle over what is socialism and what is not socialism.&#8221;</p><p>Of course not. It would mean having to explain why you&#8217;re screaming &#8220;Socialism!&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: secularhumanizinevoluter</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458871</link> <dc:creator>secularhumanizinevoluter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:32:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458871</guid> <description>&quot;BluePuppy says:
19 January 2010 at 1:22 pm
I’m not going to get into a semantic battle over what is socialism and what is not socialism. &quot;Because he/she/it hasn&#039;t the faintest idea what socialism IS. He/She/It just likes throwing around repugnantklan and teabagger talking points as given out. How pathetic is DAT!DB, being a true &quot;liberal&quot; does NOT mean you listen to any shithouseratcrazy ranting from folks who have demonstrated they haven&#039;t got anything worth listening to to say. You listen till you see where they&#039;re coming from aka &quot;Obama and his EXTREME Socialism&quot;
and you safely shunt them off into the moron room and close the door. Frankley at this point in hostory there is NOTHING any repugnantklaner or teabagger has to say I give to fu*ks at a rolling doughnut about.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;BluePuppy says:<br
/> 19 January 2010 at 1:22 pm<br
/> I’m not going to get into a semantic battle over what is socialism and what is not socialism. &#8221;</p><p>Because he/she/it hasn&#8217;t the faintest idea what socialism IS. He/She/It just likes throwing around repugnantklan and teabagger talking points as given out. How pathetic is DAT!</p><p>DB, being a true &#8220;liberal&#8221; does NOT mean you listen to any shithouseratcrazy ranting from folks who have demonstrated they haven&#8217;t got anything worth listening to to say. You listen till you see where they&#8217;re coming from aka &#8220;Obama and his EXTREME Socialism&#8221;<br
/> and you safely shunt them off into the moron room and close the door. Frankley at this point in hostory there is NOTHING any repugnantklaner or teabagger has to say I give to fu*ks at a rolling doughnut about.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lake Lady</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458870</link> <dc:creator>Lake Lady</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:30:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458870</guid> <description>Funny, I never heard Kerry asking Obama to reign in his obnoxious, sexist supporters?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, I never heard Kerry asking Obama to reign in his obnoxious, sexist supporters?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Don Bacon</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458869</link> <dc:creator>Don Bacon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:24:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458869</guid> <description>Noogan makes an excellent point, one which I have stated in the past (which makes it an excellent point!) as: One problem with liberals is that they are often illiberal.That goes for the &quot;totalitarianism of our Democratic leadership&quot;, the &quot;authoritarian attitude&quot; of some pundits, and can even be applied to bloggers. I have left several sites because the bloggers haven&#039;t been able to accept any views other than their own without resorting to ad hominem attacks.This also applies to the &quot;experts&quot; in any field. There are people on this blog, or any blog, whose views are just as important as any in print. If you scroll up you will see the ones I mean, besides others. That&#039;s the basis of democracy.If we&#039;re going to find our way through the current messes we eventually have to work with others, some of whom don&#039;t completely agree with us. IT&#039;S OKAY. Let&#039;s be true liberals with open minds, and set an example for the clowns in the news.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noogan makes an excellent point, one which I have stated in the past (which makes it an excellent point!) as: One problem with liberals is that they are often illiberal.</p><p>That goes for the &#8220;totalitarianism of our Democratic leadership&#8221;, the &#8220;authoritarian attitude&#8221; of some pundits, and can even be applied to bloggers. I have left several sites because the bloggers haven&#8217;t been able to accept any views other than their own without resorting to ad hominem attacks.</p><p>This also applies to the &#8220;experts&#8221; in any field. There are people on this blog, or any blog, whose views are just as important as any in print. If you scroll up you will see the ones I mean, besides others. That&#8217;s the basis of democracy.</p><p>If we&#8217;re going to find our way through the current messes we eventually have to work with others, some of whom don&#8217;t completely agree with us. IT&#8217;S OKAY. Let&#8217;s be true liberals with open minds, and set an example for the clowns in the news.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BluePuppy</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458868</link> <dc:creator>BluePuppy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:22:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458868</guid> <description>I&#039;m not going to get into a semantic battle over what is socialism and what is not socialism.But instead I think it&#039;s relevant that Democracy Corps poll shows that fully 2/3 of Americans oppose this bill because they believe it&#039;s too much government intrusion in their lives.Indeed, it&#039;s ironic that Obama attacked Hillary for having mandates in her plan and Obamacare&#039;s  weakness is the requirement of everyone to purchase health care, subject to penalty.As I continually say, Obama presented himself as one thing to the broad middle of the electorate and signaled to his left wing that he was something else. The middle feels betrayed, the left feels betrayed, and the Republicans are reaping the benefit.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to get into a semantic battle over what is socialism and what is not socialism.</p><p>But instead I think it&#8217;s relevant that Democracy Corps poll shows that fully 2/3 of Americans oppose this bill because they believe it&#8217;s too much government intrusion in their lives.</p><p>Indeed, it&#8217;s ironic that Obama attacked Hillary for having mandates in her plan and Obamacare&#8217;s  weakness is the requirement of everyone to purchase health care, subject to penalty.</p><p>As I continually say, Obama presented himself as one thing to the broad middle of the electorate and signaled to his left wing that he was something else. The middle feels betrayed, the left feels betrayed, and the Republicans are reaping the benefit.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BC30</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458865</link> <dc:creator>BC30</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:55:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458865</guid> <description>Taylor:This hits the nail on the head.  Thanks again for an excellent piece.&quot;not understanding that Democratic candidates can’t simply run on being part of Obama’s orbit, which so far is leading Dems into a 2010 ditch.Candidates also need to follow their own instincts, as Coakley’s candidacy proves.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taylor:</p><p>This hits the nail on the head.  Thanks again for an excellent piece.</p><p>&#8220;not understanding that Democratic candidates can’t simply run on being part of Obama’s orbit, which so far is leading Dems into a 2010 ditch.</p><p>Candidates also need to follow their own instincts, as Coakley’s candidacy proves.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: daubry</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458864</link> <dc:creator>daubry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:54:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458864</guid> <description>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2010/01/18/brown_supporters_trying_to_suppress_vote_by_bullying/things are ugly.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2010/01/18/brown_supporters_trying_to_suppress_vote_by_bullying/" rel="nofollow">http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2010/01/18/brown_supporters_trying_to_suppress_vote_by_bullying/</a></p><p>things are ugly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: secularhumanizinevoluter</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458862</link> <dc:creator>secularhumanizinevoluter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:52:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458862</guid> <description>&quot;Noogan says:
19 January 2010 at 11:15 am
It’s not the “socialism”; it’s the “totalitarianism” of our Democratic leadership and their sycophants that bother me, their authoritarian attitudes toward ordinary Americans. I think David Brooks is right this time:&quot;Oh please, go somewhere and fu*k yourself in your own teabagger/repugnantklan ass huh?Taylor Marsh says:
19 January 2010 at 10:57 am
I’m hearing turnout is EPIC.Let&#039;s hope so.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Noogan says:<br
/> 19 January 2010 at 11:15 am<br
/> It’s not the “socialism”; it’s the “totalitarianism” of our Democratic leadership and their sycophants that bother me, their authoritarian attitudes toward ordinary Americans. I think David Brooks is right this time:&#8221;</p><p>Oh please, go somewhere and fu*k yourself in your own teabagger/repugnantklan ass huh?</p><p>Taylor Marsh says:<br
/> 19 January 2010 at 10:57 am<br
/> I’m hearing turnout is EPIC.</p><p>Let&#8217;s hope so.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lake Lady</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458861</link> <dc:creator>Lake Lady</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:51:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458861</guid> <description>Poor Digby. I still read her but it took me a while to go back. She got caught up with the Blogger Boyz and with trying to please the rabid Obots who populated her comment section.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Digby. I still read her but it took me a while to go back. She got caught up with the Blogger Boyz and with trying to please the rabid Obots who populated her comment section.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lake Lady</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458860</link> <dc:creator>Lake Lady</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458860</guid> <description>I don&#039;t know about Alan Grayson?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about Alan Grayson?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lake Lady</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458859</link> <dc:creator>Lake Lady</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:48:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458859</guid> <description>This is OT but it is such a great story. Did you all hear about the sisters in Haiti who were running an orphanage? They are just two young women. Anyway, they got in touch with family in PA,who got in touch with Rendell and some how they got the clearances for him to go down there and fly them all out! They are in Pittsburg now with the babies.One of them said that the State Department had called and told them they had paved the way for us to bring more orphans to the US. That would be great! Get those kids with no one to care for them out of there and let them have a chance here.I&#039;m sure many Americans would love to adopt them or at the very least they would be safe until family could be located.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is OT but it is such a great story. Did you all hear about the sisters in Haiti who were running an orphanage? They are just two young women. Anyway, they got in touch with family in PA,who got in touch with Rendell and some how they got the clearances for him to go down there and fly them all out! They are in Pittsburg now with the babies.</p><p>One of them said that the State Department had called and told them they had paved the way for us to bring more orphans to the US. That would be great! Get those kids with no one to care for them out of there and let them have a chance here.I&#8217;m sure many Americans would love to adopt them or at the very least they would be safe until family could be located.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: chigeeng</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458858</link> <dc:creator>chigeeng</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:45:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458858</guid> <description>I am absolutely dumbfounded.  Either Obama, Rahm, Reid are as incompetent as Bush or their true allegiances are showing through.  This is equal to George taking the surplus he inherited and creating a massive deficit he did.
If only more democrats were as true to their convictions as Alan Grayson the public would be giving Obama carte blanche to anything he wanted to do.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am absolutely dumbfounded.  Either Obama, Rahm, Reid are as incompetent as Bush or their true allegiances are showing through.  This is equal to George taking the surplus he inherited and creating a massive deficit he did.<br
/> If only more democrats were as true to their convictions as Alan Grayson the public would be giving Obama carte blanche to anything he wanted to do.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: blue27</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458855</link> <dc:creator>blue27</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:43:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458855</guid> <description>I used to read Digby first thing every morning. Now I read Taylor Marsh instead. Excellent analysis, Taylor.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to read Digby first thing every morning. Now I read Taylor Marsh instead. Excellent analysis, Taylor.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lake Lady</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458854</link> <dc:creator>Lake Lady</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:42:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458854</guid> <description>Anthony Weiner was on MJ and he always says things I want to hear. For an example he thinks there is no way Obama can cram the Senate bill down the throats of the House.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony Weiner was on MJ and he always says things I want to hear. For an example he thinks there is no way Obama can cram the Senate bill down the throats of the House.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TaosJohn</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-458853</link> <dc:creator>TaosJohn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:36:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=48434#comment-458853</guid> <description>&quot;Democrats better understand the collective rage against the Democratic leadership&quot;It&#039;s not just the leadership. That&#039;s what&#039;s REALLY enraging. Not a single Democratic senator has said what needs saying, and hardly any representatives. But the leadership is certifiably insane, true. The coming slaughter will be a thing to behold...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Democrats better understand the collective rage against the Democratic leadership&#8221;</p><p>It&#8217;s not just the leadership. That&#8217;s what&#8217;s REALLY enraging. Not a single Democratic senator has said what needs saying, and hardly any representatives. But the leadership is certifiably insane, true. The coming slaughter will be a thing to behold&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 1277/1371 objects using memcached

Served from: taylormarsh.com @ 2012-02-10 06:54:34 -->
