<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Prop 8 in Court</title> <atom:link href="http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/prop-8-in-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/prop-8-in-court/</link> <description>Taylor Marsh - News, Political Analysis, Foreign Policy, and  Independent Political Opinion on Progressive Politics</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:24:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: BC30</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/prop-8-in-court/comment-page-1/#comment-458010</link> <dc:creator>BC30</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:46:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=47776#comment-458010</guid> <description>The argument used the most is that Gay Marriage or Marriage Equality will change the institution of marriage, marriage is a sacred bond between one man and one woman.  But, we argue that the thing most threatening sanctity of marriage is divorce.  And, of course, since gay couples can&#039;t get married, gay couples aren&#039;t the ones threatening marriage.Not that I advocate going back to the dark ages and not allowing people to divorce (think of the rammifictions this would have on women, a sort of turning back on women&#039;s rights), but I&#039;d love to get a list of every Congressman who either got divorced or cheated on a spouse who aren&#039;t fighting hard for marriage equality.  It&#039;s a double standard.  You can&#039;t pick and choose what you like about marriage -- talk about one man and one woman, but forget the fact that it is designed to be an eternal bond.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The argument used the most is that Gay Marriage or Marriage Equality will change the institution of marriage, marriage is a sacred bond between one man and one woman.  But, we argue that the thing most threatening sanctity of marriage is divorce.  And, of course, since gay couples can&#8217;t get married, gay couples aren&#8217;t the ones threatening marriage.</p><p>Not that I advocate going back to the dark ages and not allowing people to divorce (think of the rammifictions this would have on women, a sort of turning back on women&#8217;s rights), but I&#8217;d love to get a list of every Congressman who either got divorced or cheated on a spouse who aren&#8217;t fighting hard for marriage equality.  It&#8217;s a double standard.  You can&#8217;t pick and choose what you like about marriage &#8212; talk about one man and one woman, but forget the fact that it is designed to be an eternal bond.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joyce Arnold</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/prop-8-in-court/comment-page-1/#comment-457990</link> <dc:creator>Joyce Arnold</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:22:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=47776#comment-457990</guid> <description>A sort of related story in The Advocate: &quot;Gay Vs. Democratic Party,&quot;:
&quot;They’re fond of your checkbooks — and deaf to your demands for equal rights. What will it take for the Democratic Party to step up?&quot;  http://advocate.com/Politics/Politicians/Gays_vs_Democratic_Party/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sort of related story in The Advocate: &#8220;Gay Vs. Democratic Party,&#8221;:<br
/> &#8220;They’re fond of your checkbooks — and deaf to your demands for equal rights. What will it take for the Democratic Party to step up?&#8221; <a
href="http://advocate.com/Politics/Politicians/Gays_vs_Democratic_Party/" rel="nofollow">http://advocate.com/Politics/Politicians/Gays_vs_Democratic_Party/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Divorce and Proposition 8 &#124; Xenia Institute</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/prop-8-in-court/comment-page-1/#comment-457976</link> <dc:creator>Divorce and Proposition 8 &#124; Xenia Institute</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:47:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=47776#comment-457976</guid> <description>[...] correlation had gone the other way, I wouldn’t suddenly become an opponent of marriage equality. Taylor Marsh &#124;  Ted Olson states, “First – Marriage is vitally important in American society. Second – By [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] correlation had gone the other way, I wouldn’t suddenly become an opponent of marriage equality. Taylor Marsh |  Ted Olson states, “First – Marriage is vitally important in American society. Second – By [...]</p><p
class="uexc_utils-links"> <a
href='http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/prop-8-in-court/comment-page-1/?uexc_edit=457976#comment-457976' class='uexc-edit-link'>Edit</a></p>]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joyce Arnold</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/prop-8-in-court/comment-page-1/#comment-457975</link> <dc:creator>Joyce Arnold</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:47:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=47776#comment-457975</guid> <description>As a lesbian, but also as someone who simply thinks civil rights shouldn&#039;t be limited by virtue of sexual orientation, gender, race, income, religion, etc., I appreciate this post, Taylor.The argument that by &quot;giving&quot; the right to a civil marriage to lesbians and gays, heterosexual marriages are somehow reduced, is ludicrous. But it&#039;s the argument I&#039;ve heard most often for the last 20 years. The fact that when different race marriages became legal, same race marriages didn&#039;t suddenly suffer a reduction in &quot;value,&quot; or in numbers of couples marrying, seems lost for those who so vehemently oppose &quot;same sex marriage.&quot; And the fact that such &quot;same sex marriage&quot; rights are often put to popular vote ... somehow that doesn&#039;t seem to phase a good number of people.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a lesbian, but also as someone who simply thinks civil rights shouldn&#8217;t be limited by virtue of sexual orientation, gender, race, income, religion, etc., I appreciate this post, Taylor.</p><p>The argument that by &#8220;giving&#8221; the right to a civil marriage to lesbians and gays, heterosexual marriages are somehow reduced, is ludicrous. But it&#8217;s the argument I&#8217;ve heard most often for the last 20 years. The fact that when different race marriages became legal, same race marriages didn&#8217;t suddenly suffer a reduction in &#8220;value,&#8221; or in numbers of couples marrying, seems lost for those who so vehemently oppose &#8220;same sex marriage.&#8221; And the fact that such &#8220;same sex marriage&#8221; rights are often put to popular vote &#8230; somehow that doesn&#8217;t seem to phase a good number of people.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taylor Marsh</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/prop-8-in-court/comment-page-1/#comment-457965</link> <dc:creator>Taylor Marsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:37:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=47776#comment-457965</guid> <description>Interesting...http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/01/divorce-rates-appear-higher-in-states.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230;</p><p><a
href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/01/divorce-rates-appear-higher-in-states.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/01/divorce-rates-appear-higher-in-states.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taylor Marsh</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/prop-8-in-court/comment-page-1/#comment-457956</link> <dc:creator>Taylor Marsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:05:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=47776#comment-457956</guid> <description>tonyb39 says:
12 January 2010 at 8:06 amIt may be as simple as freedom to follow your personal destiny without anyone dictating that you can&#039;t.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tonyb39 says:<br
/> 12 January 2010 at 8:06 am</p><p>It may be as simple as freedom to follow your personal destiny without anyone dictating that you can&#8217;t.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Don Bacon</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/prop-8-in-court/comment-page-1/#comment-457953</link> <dc:creator>Don Bacon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:48:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=47776#comment-457953</guid> <description>But . but . but . the important question, in this country anyhow, is: What Does the Bible Say?The King James version of the Bible does talk about husbands and wives, and how wives should submit to husbands, and how they should marry, but it never, ever mentions that gender is a factor, does it?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But . but . but . the important question, in this country anyhow, is: What Does the Bible Say?</p><p>The King James version of the Bible does talk about husbands and wives, and how wives should submit to husbands, and how they should marry, but it never, ever mentions that gender is a factor, does it?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tonyb39</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/prop-8-in-court/comment-page-1/#comment-457949</link> <dc:creator>tonyb39</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:06:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=47776#comment-457949</guid> <description>Oh Taylor,good piece!I wish as a gay guy i could explain as well as you did why marriage is so important to me.I have no one i want to marry at the moment,but i want the right to do so.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Taylor,good piece!I wish as a gay guy i could explain as well as you did why marriage is so important to me.I have no one i want to marry at the moment,but i want the right to do so.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pmichael</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/prop-8-in-court/comment-page-1/#comment-457946</link> <dc:creator>pmichael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:32:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=47776#comment-457946</guid> <description>I find it interesting when the rightwing makes statements like; &quot;&lt;i&gt;If we let this happen, then next people will want to marry their dog.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;
Having heard several variations on this theme it made me wonder. When the &#039;vote&#039; was finally given to both Blacks and women - I wonder if anyone at that time claimed, &quot;&lt;i&gt;If we allow this, then next they&#039;ll let dogs vote!&lt;/i&gt;&quot;
I bet it happened.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting when the rightwing makes statements like; &#8220;<i>If we let this happen, then next people will want to marry their dog.</i>&#8221;<br
/> Having heard several variations on this theme it made me wonder. When the &#8216;vote&#8217; was finally given to both Blacks and women &#8211; I wonder if anyone at that time claimed, &#8220;<i>If we allow this, then next they&#8217;ll let dogs vote!</i>&#8221;<br
/> I bet it happened.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djjl</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/prop-8-in-court/comment-page-1/#comment-457944</link> <dc:creator>djjl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:32:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=47776#comment-457944</guid> <description>What I heard from Ted Olson was really quite amazing.   Could there be hope for this nation?  Maybe.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I heard from Ted Olson was really quite amazing.   Could there be hope for this nation?  Maybe.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hillarysupporter55</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/prop-8-in-court/comment-page-1/#comment-457938</link> <dc:creator>Hillarysupporter55</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 05:57:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=47776#comment-457938</guid> <description>Taylor,Thank you for bringing attention to this issue! So much is at stake for the GLBT community and yet no one seems to be talking about this trial. As a proud gay American, and as an American in general, thank you.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taylor,</p><p>Thank you for bringing attention to this issue! So much is at stake for the GLBT community and yet no one seems to be talking about this trial. As a proud gay American, and as an American in general, thank you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: whitepaw</title><link>http://taylormarsh.com/blog/2010/01/prop-8-in-court/comment-page-1/#comment-457937</link> <dc:creator>whitepaw</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 05:10:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylormarsh.com/?p=47776#comment-457937</guid> <description>Absolutely Taylor...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely Taylor&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/29 queries in 0.039 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 729/769 objects using memcached

Served from: taylormarsh.com @ 2012-02-10 07:36:16 -->
