TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Archive | February, 2010

The Elizabeth Edwards Tragedy

cross-posted and expanded at Huffington Post

NationalEnquirer_Edwards_doc-furious-montage

According to ABC News (with video), Elizabeth Edwards “may be preparing to sue her husband’s longtime aide for allegedly contributing to the demise of her marriage.” Mrs. Edwards also making demands of Andrew Young, while threatening to charge him with “alienation of affection.” Whether she does or not is immaterial at this point, because the choices of Mrs. Edwards long ago doomed her.

Covering for her husband to keep his presidential hopes alive. Putting her own credibility on the line for something that she had to know would eventually unravel. Fighting a physical assault while living a lie. Writing a book to find a pathway through, but forgetting that the only way to get out is by accepting and facing the truth. The embarrassment of negotiating a ban of Reille Hunter’s name on Oprah. John Edwards admitting the affair, continuing to lie about the extent of it. The alliance of a child ignored. Mrs. Edwards’ coming completely unglued during the falsely laid presidential campaign now in print for all to see, as her friends rally around her, saying it’s true, but who can blame her? The book from the aide who kept the secret and put his life on the line. The sex tape rumors. The latest from the National Enquirer that according to the Enquirer, John Edwards proposed to Reille Hunter and she has accepted. This being denied from an Edwards’ spokesperson, for what that’s worth at this stage. Yet, Elizabeth Edwards “may” decide to go after Andrew Young for ruining her marriage.

After “Game Change” broke the story on Elizabeth Edwards, followed by friends writing that the behavior depicted was true, there still hasn’t been very much talk about Mrs. Edwards’ culpability in the whole presidential campaign charade and what it says about her own character. Many people understandably sympathetic towards her, but also giving her a pass on her own behavior, because of the horrendous tragedies she’s faced, the unspeakable loss of her son, then the debilitating unfairness of being struck with incurable cancer. The unfairness is choking. Let’s hope she finds peace, but there is still much reckoning for the covering and lying she did for her husband, which cannot be excused even by her incredible challenges, which I so respect and for which I have much sympathy.

See, I watched my mother fight for well over ten years with the worst kind of lymphoma you can imagine. Operation after operation, in the midst of learning how to make a living, with my father’s death revealing she didn’t even know where he kept the checkbook, let alone the state of their finances. When she finally got work, we used to celebrate when she’d get a nickel raise, which came every several months. My mother a woman who had to learn to make a living in life with no skills, a young daughter of never ending dreams and ambitions to raise, with no road map on how she’d help get it done; the only goal in her heart was for me to fly high. After one of her last operations, she came out of it with her entire head in a cast, only one eye showing, the surgeon having to break bones to rip the cancer from her body, for the umpteenth time. We worked together, me helping her learn to talk well all over again. But never once in all these torturous years did my mother lose her dignity, her faith, or ever think of taking advantage of someone else, though she and I had very rough times due to other horrific realities we never would face together before she died, but stalked us every day. I’ve never written about this because it’s wrenching to the point of distraction for me to recall, as her death was as violent as you can imagine, more so than I can retell; the whole thing practically paralyzes me to this day to even recall, as the horror haunts me still. A wrenching choice the difference in saving my own soul. I tell this tale finally to say that there is no excuse for selling out people because of burdens you face. Many others have fought like my mother, who until the end, against all odds, kept her dignity and never acted out in a manner unbecoming of the person she was when she was well. In the end raising a daughter who remains undaunted through the amazing ride of successes, failures, rises, falls, highs, and backbreaking lows, while facing life faithfully fearless, because of the woman who came before her who gave her a life.

People battle horrific illnesses every day and never stoop to taking people hostage over it. Let alone letting the actual monster in the maelstrom off the hook.

There was a far flung hope that just maybe, with Elizabeth finally accepting the loss of her greatest love and moving on legally separating from John, there would be some peace to find within her own personal world, maybe even her own realization of what she cost herself. I certainly wish her nothing but peace. But if the news about her going after Andrew Young is true it seems that Mrs. Edwards hasn’t learned a thing.

It’s all the woman’s fault when things you know about and hide end up spiraling out of control. Mrs. Edwards initially a victim of John’s ego, the realization of what he’d done a moment to escape for her own self-preservation. But somewhere in this mess she decided that keeping John was worth more than keeping her self-respect; and that she could retain love that was long gone. What she did for love the worst example I’ve seen of an abused wife who can’t let go of her abuser. A tragic tale of ego and self-destruction over which, after the initial betrayal was known, Elizabeth Edwards could have controlled, especially if she’d come clean herself about what the knowledge of Mr. Edwards’ betrayal had done to her and how she’d acted out during the presidential season.

If only Elizabeth Edwards’ book had been about that; about John Edwards’ lying, depraved duplicity, her own cowardice in refusing to stand up to him, instead of the story she chose to tell, however important. If the threats of her unleashing what she knows about her husband in divorce court turn out to be true, well, she may finally be set free.

No man is worth one-half the grief of this sorry saga. That Elizabeth Edwards continued to sell her own soul for his affections, which she lost anyway, offers a very public example of what can happen when a woman puts herself behind the man, which in the end gets you nothing; your ego in command leading to your own self-destruction. For once this kind of man knows you’ll do anything for him, you just become his whipping post, but you also end up responsible for the damage done to other people’s lives.

As for John Edwards, at least his daughter with Ms. Hunter will know she had a father. Someone who is a completely different man than the one who ran for president, because that person never existed in the first place. The enablers around him protecting his fantasy persona.

Elizabeth Edwards was a primary player in this modern Shakespearean tragedy, where no one has been spared, least of all Mrs. Edwards, who lost everything, including herself.

Photo via doc_furious montage

Read full story · Comments { 36 }

McCain-Lieberman Push Iran Human Rights Bill

This would authorize the president to deny visas and freeze economic assets for people in Iran who are responsible for the kind of brutality that we’re seeing on these videos,” Lieberman said during an appearance on MSNBC. – The Hill

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

On the 31st anniversary of the Iranian revolution, the awesome twosome ride again.

The co-sponsors of the legislation include Senators Evan Bayh, Jon Kyl, Dick Durbin, Lindsey Graham, Robert Casey, Susan Collins, Kirsten Gillibrand, Sam Brownback, and Ted Kaufman.

From Laura Rozen over at Politico:

“The overall sanctions scheme lifts when the President can certify that the Iranian government has taken certain tangible steps to improve the human rights situation inside the country, such as releasing all political prisoners,” he said.

“As Iran sanctions go, this one should not be controversial,” the aide continued. The basic structure of the legislation closely parallels that of the JADE Act – the legislation put forward in late 2007 by then-Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joe Biden and then-House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Tom Lantos against the Burmese junta, after its crackdown on peaceful protesters.

“The real prize will be convincing the Europeans to consider similar targeted sanctions against human rights abusers in Iran,” he continued.

“The key to this legislation is to target the senior [Iran Revolutionary Guards Corps] commanders who are both human rights abusers and deeply involved in running those IRGC front companies generating enormous profits for the Guard and the Basij,” said the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies’ Mark Dubowitz. That is how the Senate “bill can, and probably will, be integrated into the broader sanctions bill” currently in conference that will make its way to the president’s desk.

Some reports call the protests today a “fizzle,” but one must understand that if the crackdown wasn’t in place millions of Iranians would march. The brutality of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard continues, while the clerics squabble.

As for Ahmadinejad’s nuclear ambition’s announcement, consider it PR mixed with bravura, because the Iranians see nuclear enrichment as their right, with proud nationalism part of the mix. From the Washington Post today:

Iran has over 8,000 centrifuges at Natanz, although not all are working. It has amassed about 1.8 tons of low-enriched uranium – more than enough for one warhead should it opt for that choice.

Iranian officials have said that they expect to produce 3 to 5 kilograms (up to 12 pounds) of 20-percent uranium a month. David Albright of the Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security, said that at that rate, it would take Tehran about three years to produce enough for further enrichment into the 25 kilograms (55 pounds) of weapons-grade uranium needed for one warhead.

The IAEA document said the agency had asked for details on “the timetable for the production process (including the starting date and the expected duration of the campaign), along with other technical details.” Albright said that indicated that the Iranians were keeping silent on how long they would enrich to the higher grade and thus how much material they intended to produce.

I remember the revolution that helped topple Pres. Jimmy Carter, and usher in the era of Reagan. It’s hard to believe it was so long ago.

Read full story · Comments { 8 }

The Swoon

intoxicating

Well, never let it be said that the traditional media establishment won’t eventually catch on. David Broder, the Washington dean of politics, finally takes a deep breath only to find himself intoxicated by Sarah. The political perfume that’s been dropped on doorsteps in every conservative conclave in the nation, created the day she decided that the Republican establishment wouldn’t drive her train.

… Freed of the responsibilities she carried as governor of Alaska, devoid of any official title but armed with regular gigs on Fox News Channel and more speaking invitations than she can fulfill, Palin is perhaps the most visible Republican in the land.

More important, she has locked herself firmly in the populist embrace that every skillful outsider candidate from George Wallace to Jimmy Carter to Ronald Reagan to Bill Clinton has utilized when running against “the political establishment.”

“Freed of the responsibilities she carried as governor of Alaska”… That’s a good one and just as I expected, the slate brushed clean of any icky, embarrassing quitter description that would beat up Sarah’s brand.

Hillary Clinton, now inoculated and neutered over at State, with her candidacy a mere memory, has finally washed the bile from the Establishment’s throat over the possibility of her presidency. So the wannabe path for Sarah is clear and she can walk freer from the fear of Mr. Broder pronouncing she’s unfit. Especially since Sarah Palin represents the counterpoint to what’s happening, mirroring the mood of the country.

But in the present mood of the country, Palin is by all odds a threat to the more uptight Republican aspirants such as Mitt Romney and Tim Pawlenty — and potentially, to Obama as well. … Those who want to stop her will need more ammunition than deriding her habit of writing on her hand. The lady is good.

Oh dear, the dean invoked “O.”

There is nothing that gives the White House crew and their No One Can Beat Our Guy fans a better laugh than anyone thinking that Barack Obama would have to worry about the likes of Sarah Palin. In fact, the way the White House has been taking their sweet time on just about everything, you’d think they’d won an 8-year stint. That was assumed, right?

The dean of the Washington establishment is here to disabuse them of such high falutin thinkin’. There’s new change a foot and it doesn’t come cloaked in an Ivy League resume, GOP Establishment credentials or the centrisy-centrism, lefty moving right sort of gaming nonsense. She’s just Sarah, bringing common sense to America, something Washington sorely needs.

Palin’s “pitch perfect populism” to the rescue.

After all, the smart set blew it.

Read full story · Comments { 38 }

Democrats Can’t Lead, Republicans are Worse

Scanned Image-452_2

CBS’s Mark Knoller makes an amazing and completely wrong assessment of Obama’s bipartisanship appeal to Republicans: What these presidential appeals for bipartisanship always mean is: do it my way. Your liberal media at work.

I guess Knoller thinks Obama’s commitment to nuclear and “clean coal” technology, which began long before he was elected, not to mention Obama’s own version of “drill, baby drill” are just for show. It was quite amusing during Obama’s impromptu presser yesterday that he was having a hard time not using Sarah Palin’s “all-of-the-above” language, while saying exactly the same thing. Another note on Palin, Nate Silver has done the rundown on her electoral chances, along with Romney and Huckabee. Interesting stuff.

And no doubt Rep. John Boehner would agree with Mr. Knoller about Obama, but he’s currently too busy chasing his tale and his rhetoric now that Pres. Obama has made the bipartisanship manifest in televised form.

As for Newt Gingrich, who can’t keep terrorists straight, with Jon Stewart schooling him last night, and Kitt Bond, who’s finally made a complete fool out of himself for announcing to the world that John Brennan should resign for calling out Republicans for politicizing national security while also getting the facts wrong, this is the GOP’s national security presence today. At least Palin has her talking points down, which one would assume will be the same for Romney and Huckabee (add more God), which is why Gen. David Petraeus could pop up on any Republican’s short list for veep. They’re long overdue for an Eisenhower like push and the timing is perfect, because they want to beat Obama in 2012 as bad as we wanted to beat Bush in 2004.

That Democrats are only splitting independents with Republicans, even as their brand remains bad, illustrates perfectly why SEIU’s Andy Stern gives Democrats “About three or four” on leadership over the last year, with more union worries ahead for Dems.

And an… Oh. My. God. is earned on this one from Ezra Klein. Who finally proves, with no doubts left, that the entire last year of his pontificating about Obama’s perfection was worth exactly nothing.

Both sides suck, according to just about anyone you talk to who isn’t tied to one side or the other, and even many who are, which is why the Tea Partiers are having all the fun.

Read full story · Comments { 22 }

Tone Deaf In Chief

“I, like most of the American people, don’t begrudge people success or wealth. That is part of the free-market system.”Pres. Barack Obama

Obama_begrudgebanks

Well, the new media heavies (and latest wannabe) are having a blast with Obama’s latest blunder.

Simon Johnson blasts Obama, with Paul Krugman calling him “clueless,” followed by “Oh. My. God.” after Krugman quotes Obama.

No one should begrudge the success of people, which is what Obama is saying. There are wealthy I know who started from nothing, their accomplishments basically representing the fulfillment of the American dream.

However, these people don’t play in the political world where moments in time meet acts of rhetorical flourish that trigger the American public’s outrage button. Especially when your remarks are to simply show you’re a friend to business, which isn’t in doubt in the first place. Via ABC’s Jake Tapper:

The seeming shift in tone comes at a time that Wall Street executives have been relaying to the White House that the president needs to be more encouraging of their efforts if he expects them to be part of the solution in terms of job growth. Several business executives have told the administration that attacking businesses so vociferously doesn’t exactly help create a positive business climate.

So, the moneyed interests are playing presidential yo-yo, with Obama’s head on a string.

Not surprisingly, Pres. Obama evidently doesn’t get the ricochet quotient of his quote today. The White House obviously believing these silly things are just a Washington game. Not if it comes back to bite, which anyone could have predicted. Except, of course, the Chicago mafia crew that’s drilling a hole for their boss.

Seeing negative ads running in your head yet?

Begin walk back in 3… 2…

Obama_begrudgebanksDCaller

Read full story · Comments { 59 }

The Accidental Godfather of the Tea Party

–updated–

BUSH_missmeyet

Republicans have significantly narrowed the gap with Democrats on who is trusted to deal with the country’s problems and have sharply reduced several of President Obama’s main political advantages, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll. … Asked how they would vote in the November House elections, Americans split evenly — 46 percent siding with the Democrats, 46 percent with the Republicans. As recently as four months ago, Democrats held a 51 to 39 percent advantage on this question. – In poll, Republicans gaining political ground on Obama

NPR has the background on the billboard out of Minnesota, which was “paid for by ‘a group of small business owners who feel like Washington is against them,’ a spokeswoman for the sign company.”

George W. Bush’s budget busting, big government Republicanism started the reactive rise on the right. Barack Obama ignited it, with independents and others joining in after his bank bailout and the 2009 stimulus. With the Democratic collapse on the health care message losing to “death panels” the final push.

“I, like most of the American people, don’t begrudge people success or wealth. That is part of the free-market system.”Pres. Barack Obama (h/t sunlight)

But miss George W. Bush?

The Bush billboard could, however, give a window into Harold Ford, Jr.’s candidacy. The moneyed interests are mad.

TM SNOW NOTE: The blizzard this time comes with gusting winds, bending trees and breaking more limbs, with only the main roads passable. I ventured out today in Mark’s big truck, which was quite a ride, as I’ve become a master at driving in the snow again. Very thankful that Golds Gym has die hard management, because I don’t know what I’d do without it right now (I pretty much had the whole gym to myself today). …as the snow continues… coming down sideways sometimes, with blasts of cold air swirling it everywhere.

Read full story · Comments { 13 }

Sarah Palin Won’t Make Hillary’s Mistakes

Marc Ambinder has written a very interesting post today on the devilish prowess of Sarah Palin, someone I’ve continually covered since the 2008 election ended. For good reason. There is no one who fits the mood or the times or fills the current political vacuum better than Sarah Palin. There has also never been anyone as electric on the right since Ronald Reagan. It’s true we’re a long way off from 2012 and it’s useless to predict what could happen. But let’s just say Palin’s preparing her way, because she intends to be ready if the playing field stays as open as it is today, because she has no intention of letting the Establishment ruin her party like what happened to Hillary, because Mrs. Clinton actually was the establishment candidate or so she thought.

As the left and the DNC mock Palin and delight in the prospect of a potential 2012 candidacy, with the Establishment crew on the right clucking over her lack of experience and required learning still needed to be done, Sarah Palin quietly goes about her business building her own personal base. Tea Partiers got her first. Next stop?

Next week, Palin will be a VIP guest of honor at the Daytona International Speedway for the Daytona 500. She’ll walk among the campers and RVs set up infield. This summer, she’s agreed to speak at an international bowling expo. In April, in Las Vegas, Palin will keynote the Wine and Spirit Wholesalers Convention at Caesar’s Palace. She will make choices in Republican primaries — she campaigned Sunday with Rick Perry, bearing a “Hi mom!” on her palm — more on that in a bit — and an eloquent jab at the President: “‘We will proudly cling to our guns and our religion.” – Marc Ambinder

I’ve never thought the mostly elitist arguments against her are worth the air needed to spew the venom. Because unless the Republicans can find someone with the same wattage, as Ambinder notes in his post today, she’ll be the toughest in the crowd to beat.

“If the primaries were this year, I suspect she’d be nominated,” a senior adviser to one of Sarah Palin’s potential rivals confides. It’s easy to see why: no one who’s thinking of running beats the enthusiasm she generates among Republican activists. But there is more to the case for Palin than just the confluence of her personality and a vacuum within the Republican Party: there is a method to her management of her public image. It strongly hints that she has pretty much decided to run for president in 2012, unless something knocks her out of the race; it is more organized and structured that it appears; and it is something that Republican insiders, in particular, will ignore at their peril. … – Marc Ambinder

Mitt Romney’s lack of emotional connection with voters works against him, even as the economic climate plays into his strengths. But Palin’s evangelical roots have the potential to wipe him out in the primary. As for Mike Huckabee, Sarahcuda will annihilate him with negative ads on his pardons, so it remains to be seen if his current popularity can withstand her onslaught, which will be unflinchingly devastating. As Sarah Palin has no compunction about playing hard and dirty.

As for the Republican Establishment, Sarah Palin has no intention of going the Hillary Clinton route. Palin knows they can’t stand her, fear her and will stop her if she gives them a chance or waits for their nod. Something Hillary never grasped of the Senate Democrats who worked behind her back to encourage Barack Obama to run. All’s fair in politics, but Hillary missed what was happening all around her. It’s not that Democrats hated Hillary like the GOP Establishment does Palin, but people from Harry Reid to Ted Kennedy to Nancy Pelosi were rooting for Obama, some long before Hillary even announced, with key players offering their support to Obama in private and long before it was made official.

It’s too soon to tell about Sarah and 2012, but she’s not going to wait for anyone else to give her permission to run for president. She’s not going to be a good little Republican and wait her turn either. Her instincts tell her, and Scott Brown’s win showed her, that the mood is right for someone who can tap into that populist, old fashioned anger, topped with a lot of home spun, good old American patriotism, which she hopes harkens back to a time when America was on top in all columns, everyone was working, Detroit was selling cars, and American prestige financially was still intact. Making people feel good about her and thinking it can translate to a different type of change.

Palin plans to ride the wave of gun toting, religion clinging, angry Americans, as they were known in 2008, as far as she can.

Besides, Hillary already prepared the way so that no woman on the national scene will ever have to go through the media gauntlet she did again.

Anyway, Sarah doesn’t care what the “lame stream media” says or reports. She’s already seen and weathered the worst to come out on the other side, already failed, so she’s fearless. Don’t like her crib notes on her palm? Mock her like Gibbs did, while also proving she’s relevant and what she does matters. She doesn’t care and neither do her fans, whom she hopes to turn into “Run, Sarah, Run!” activists for 2012. That dream of being the first female U.S. president never leaving her mind, the only downside of losing being she’ll be wildly wealthy.

Besides, Sarah’s got Fox, “the most trusted name in news,” and the biggest thing on the dial. Well, it was, until Sarah came to cable.

Read full story · Comments { 42 }

Brennan, and ‘Bomb Iran’ is Back

Some news that’s surfacing slowly is Iran’s new bluster on refining higher grade uranium. Russia and Israel seem to be talking the same language, while China still isn’t willing to sign on to harsh sanctions, something SecDef Gates is promising will come sooner rather than later. Even as it will take some time to reconfigure the Natanz facility to handle higher grade enrichment. Let’s call this one developing

Meanwhile, landing in front of hotel rooms across the nation, Brennan’s USA Today op-ed, as excerpted below. Brennan continues the campaign he began over the weekend on “Meet the Press.”

I have no idea why Scott over at Powerline has decided to channel Daniel Pipes in rebutting Brennan. Well, actually I do, it’s just it’s hard to take anyone seriously who believes hitting Iran is good for the U.S. That is what matters, right? Not to the right. Anyway, if you don’t know, he was the inspiration for Sarah Palin’s “declare war on Iran” (see video) advice to Obama on how he could “save” his presidency, with an Iran bombing also supposed to illustrate his “support for Israel.” Pipes going to great lengths in his article to illustrate the effectiveness of Obama hitting Iran.

And, no, these people aren’t kidding.

Now to Brennan:

Immediately after the failed Christmas Day attack, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was thoroughly interrogated and provided important information. Senior counterterrorism officials from the White House, the intelligence community and the military were all actively discussing this case before he was Mirandized and supported the decision to charge him in criminal court.

The most important breakthrough occurred after Abdulmutallab was read his rights, which the FBI made standard policy under Michael Mukasey, President Bush’s attorney general. The critics who want the FBI to ignore this long-established practice also ignore the lessons we have learned in waging this war: Terrorists such as Jose Padilla and Saleh al-Mari did not cooperate when transferred to military custody, which can harden one’s determination to resist cooperation.

It’s naive to think that transferring Abdulmutallab to military custody would have caused an outpouring of information. There is little difference between military and civilian custody, other than an interrogator with a uniform. The suspect gets access to a lawyer, and interrogation rules are nearly identical.

Would-be shoe bomber Richard Reid was read his Miranda rights five minutes after being taken off a plane he tried to blow up. The same people who criticize the president today were silent back then.

Pres. Obama’s approval rating on foreign affairs is high, even according to Gallup, is compared to Bush. Even without any real progress in the Middle East, the world thinks anything is better than Bush-Cheney.

Perceptions of U.S. leadership worldwide improved significantly from 2008 to 2009. The U.S.-Global Leadership Project, a partnership between the Meridian International Center and Gallup, finds that a median of 51% of the world approves of the job performance of the current leadership of the U.S., up from a median of 34% in 2008.

Unfortunately, not everyone is like me and votes on foreign affairs. It’s on the economy that Obama’s getting creamed (h/t Laura Rozen), which is what moves most voters. See Bob Herbert, an Obama loyalist who is not very happy anymore.

Obama_econdown
graph via Gallup

Read full story · Comments { 8 }

What’s In It for Republicans?

What do you know. Ezra Klein finally gets it. Better late than never, though as long as it took it’s not very impressive.

On Sunday, John Boehner and Mitch McConnell responded to Barack Obama’s summit invitation by demanding Obama scrap the health-care reform bill entirely. This is the context for that demand. What they want isn’t a bill that incorporates their ideas. They’ve already got that. What they want is no bill at all. And that’s a hard position for the White House to compromise with.

Regardless of the obvious, Pres. Obama is going to re-engage by inviting Republicans to come into the room with their ideas on health care, with Kathleen Sebelius offering the following assessment, via HuffPo’s Sam Stein:

Sebelius said that the president views the bipartisan meeting as a needed pivot to move reform forward. Asked if he will expedite the legislative process following his various sit-downs with congressional Republicans, she replied: “I certainly think so. I think he sees this as a step to actually accelerating the process forward. He wants to move forward. He wants a bill at his desk and he sees this as kind of closing the loop and let’s go.” …

Once again, Obama’s people are assuming Republicans want to play along. That Pres. Obama has the clout or they care enough about his charm to join in. It’s certainly not his power to punish that bothers them.

Let’s come at this from another direction. What’s in it for Republicans if they do play the bipartisan game?

You got it. Nothing. They see it as handing Obama and the Democrats a win that goes into the FDR column of big domestic policies that have wedded people to Democrats through these issues. So, seriously, why would Republicans do anything that offers a headline like Obama’s bipartisan summit worked?

The only way Republicans will sign on is if Obama let’s them walk away with talking points they can use with the base, including but not exclusively Tea Partiers, who is eating them alive in a district near you.

Any bill out of that deliberation wouldn’t be worth having, which has been the Republican goal all along.

Everyone on the same scorecard now?

Read full story · Comments { 13 }

John Murtha is Gone

–updated–

The news came from his office, with more from the Washington Post. Chris Cilizza runs down the coming special election.

Congressman John Murtha Passes Away at Age 77

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Congressman John P. Murtha (PA-12) passed away peacefully this afternoon at 1:18 p.m. at Virginia Hospital Center in Arlington, VA. At his bedside was his family.

Murtha, 77, was Chairman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense.

First elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in February of 1974, Murtha dedicated his life to serving his country both in the military and in the halls of Congress. A former Marine, he became the first Vietnam War combat Veteran elected to the U.S. Congress.

This past Saturday, February 6, 2010, Murtha became Pennsylvania’s longest serving Member of Congress.

Back in 2006, I was involved in helping Rep. Murtha fight back against some of the most heinous swiftboating to be seen, prior to the Swift Boat Veterans, when Murtha stood up against further actions in Iraq. I joined Dave Johnson and James Cannon Boyce in “The Patriot Project” at the time, working diligently to fight back against what Republicans were doing. I was proud of our work, especially on Murtha. The man was a real war horse for the military. He was also an old time pol who was under scrutiny many times for his actions on getting contracts for his district in Pennsylvania. Murtha was one of the few people with the courage to go up against SecDef Gates on Afghanistan last September. No more troops was Murtha’s line and he never let up.

Blessings and meditations go out to his family, his staff and everyone he touched, which is a very long list.

Read full story · Comments { 23 }

Bipartisanship Obama Believes In

The New York Times picks up on Obama’s interview with Katie Couric:

“I want to come back and have a large meeting, Republicans and Democrats, to go through systematically all the best ideas that are out there and move it forward,” Mr. Obama said in the interview from the White House Library.

Mr. Obama challenged Republicans to attend the meeting with their plans for lowering the cost of health insurance and expanding coverage to more than 30 million uninsured Americans. Republican leaders said they welcomed the opportunity and called on Democrats to start the debate from scratch, which the president said he would not do.

Democrats didn’t have to end up here. The solution was always a short list of health care specifics like portability, importation of drugs, anti-trust elements, as well as pre-existing condition exemptions as a stand alone beginning for health care.

The obvious already taking shape, as Steve Clemons cited yesterday, riffing off an important piece in FT last week. Though as I’ve stated a million times, the buck stops with Obama.

Because of the lack of Democratic leadership, which includes a lack of will to use reconciliation, but also the craftiness to pull together a bill that had a simple way forward, Republicans are in a tremendous position. It’s a political gift if they’re smart enough to accept it, though there’s no indication they’re willing to be opportunistic if it’s seen to benefit Obama. Though if you listened to “Morning Joe” this morning, an alternate universe if ever there was one today, Scarborough posited that Republicans were never offered a way into the debate, which is absolutely untrue.

This latest bipartisanship meeting is vintage David Plouffe, getting everyone in the room so that blame or credit is shared, with a new narrative able to be crafted afterward. But also showing his candidate in the light that got him elected, bipartisan Obama, the guy with no ideology. Not that has helped him so far, because leadership by its very nature requires a point of view and an ideological north so you have some place to begin, not to mention a passionate core people judge worth trusting, as they did during the election season. That is so way back when.

Steve Benen writes:

The White House seems to believe a) Republican ideas will look worse when evaluated closely; b) Democratic ideas will look much better when scrutinized; and c) when it comes to addressing the agreed-upon questions, the way forward will appear much clearer. Subjecting all of this to a transparent, bipartisan discussion may even make it significantly easier to present the package to the electorate.

Obama’s never made the argument that Benen posits, that “Republican ideas will look worse when evaluated closely.” Obama never will, as he doesn’t call out conservative ideology as being less than liberal ideas, in part because he doesn’t believe it. Pres. Obama simply wants a health care deal. A “win.”

Some still just do not understand or won’t accept the basic sincerity of Obama’s true political nature, which is always to craft a deal between two sides, no compass offered by the boss.

Whereas dealmaking is always part of the political process, leadership should begin it, starting with the reality that Democratic policy ideas on health care are better, because that’s a simple fact. The trick of the craft is to find Democratic ideals Republicans will buy. If they won’t, then pushing them through in a marketable way that voters can understand is actually giving them something better than what they’ve got. However, this requires passion on policy so voters can see it’s something worth accepting, instead of acquiescence for the sake of something hobbled together.

And as much as bipartisanship may save health care and give Obama his “win,” it also straps him into a kumbaya position, as you can’t offer a hand then get rough when Republicans won’t take it. Though that’s not a worry for Republicans who have never feared Obama’s leadership.

Besides, it’s not like the Republican base is up for it, with any nod to health care or the Democrats giving more ammunition to Tea Party candidates, who are already pressing Republicans hard.

Read full story · Comments { 40 }

Palin’s Hand-y List

Tea Party Palin

Stefan Sirucek of Huffington Post broke this story.

“Energy.”

“Budget [crossed out] (Cuts).”

“Tax.”

“Lift American spirits.”

If Sarah Palin thought she needed notes there is no reason or excuse for not simply bringing them. The junior high school action of writing things on your hand you want to remember is so fundamentally embarrassing for an adult to do that there is really nowhere to go with this except to state the obvious. Mrs. Palin is so insecure, while being so protective of her own image, that she wanted to hide the fact that she might need notes to keep her on point. That there is nothing wrong with having notes is obvious. The character flaw in trying to fool people that you don’t want them to know you do reminiscent of the 2008 primary season.

The writers on Saturday Night Live will have a banquet on this one. But I can’t wait for Jon Stewart on Monday.

Why Sarah Palin wouldn’t protect herself, setting herself up for such ridicule is beyond comprehension. Except, she just doesn’t care, feeling that the worst has happened, so that there’s almost a bulletproof nonchalance about it.

Ann Althouse weighs in and proves there’s some truth to that:

It might be a little silly to have writing on your hand, and it’s definitely awkward to look at your hand in the middle of answering a question, but those few words could hardly be of much help if you actually don’t know what you are talking about.

Silly, indeed.

The place this leads me is if Sarah Palin was a man what would happen to his reputation if he’d done something so amateurish? Yet Palin’s fans will continue to flock to her. It’s not surprising, as it’s the nature of her star power and why watching her is so fascinating. Althouse’s reaction instrumental in the collective shrug this will bring from many.

But not even George W. Bush tried this stunt and he needed all the help he could get.

The right is coming to her rescue:

And here’s a test: How many readers have NEVER written crib notes on their hand? Perhaps a few. Now, how many have pronounced “corpsman” as “corpse-man” in a nationally televised broadcast? I see. None. And with that, the trophy for ultimate stupidity goes to TOTUS.

Now, Obama earned jeers from me and others over his teleprompter at a 6th grade school room, which was earned.

It’s up to you if Sarah’s hand-y list is the same or worse.

Sarah Palin wants to be taken seriously, so let’s state the obvious to say this isn’t the way to go about it.

But the oddity of where we are in politics today is that it won’t phase some people, especially those who’ll be going to the polls in November. As for 2012… It will be very old news by then, though her adversaries aren’t likely to forget it and I’m not just talking about Democrats either.

Read full story · Comments { 76 }

Super Bowl Sunday

2010_Blizzard-II_Feb 118

Today began “State of the Union” with Candy Crowley, with one of her guests Sect. Hillary Rodham Clinton.

I’ll add a big note of praise to the political gods and CNN for Ms. Crowley, the first woman ever to anchor an important Sunday news show. Talk about paying your dues. Christiane Amanpour does foreign policy and has a show on CNN too, but Crowley’s debut signals a real first for women. As her show is power politics up against the guys in Sunday morning primetime, talking meat and potato politics. Having written about the sexism on Sunday morning for many years, to finally be able to count a qualified female anchor in the mix is a real it’s about time treat for me.

David Gregory once again provided the gag reflex for Super Bowl brunch. Who does the booking for this guy?

Fox News Sunday had Gov. Sarah Palin fresh from the Tea Party speech, as well as Tea Partier Mark Skoda. Prepare for “birther” questions. Denial of them coming soon.

Oh… and… GO SAINTS.

Consider this a Super Bowl Sunday free for all.

Read full story · Comments { 17 }

Sarah Palin: Tea Party Movement ‘Bigger Than Any Charismatic Guy with a Teleprompter’

It was Sarah Palin’s night.

After a day when the “birthers” took a lot of heat from the Tea Partiers. Breitbart sounding beyond himself.

“I was talking to her,” said Breitbart. “She was asking me if I thought it was was to bring it up, and I said, no. We have a lot of strong arguments to be making, and that is a primary argument. That is an argument for the primaries that did not take hold. The arguments that these people right here are making are substantive arguments. The elections in Virginia, New Jersey and Massachusetts were all won not on birther, but on substance. And to apply to this group of people the concept that they’re all obsessed with the birth certificate, when it’s not a winning issue–”

Winning issue? How about it’s no issue at all and wouldn’t be if Barack Obama was white. Expect the Tea Party PAC to denounce “birthers” by Monday.

But tonight it was all about Sarah.


Sarah hits Obama on national security.

“Thank you very much… Thank you so much. God bless you. … .. I am so proud to be an American! … Do you love your freedom? …”

Then asked for anyone in the audience who serves their country to stand up, thanking them for our freedom.

“Happy birthday Ronald Reagan.”

Not forgetting to give a shout out to “a guy with a truck,” Scott Brown.

After her opening salvo, a little over 6 minutes into it, Sarah Palin turned immediately to national security. Her main target, Barack Obama. “We need a commander in chief not a professor at law standing at the lectern.”

But somewhere in her harangue she got lost. “Wonder if Alaska is still the beacon of hope for their cause…” Oops.

Sarah to self, gather yourself girl, don’t lose it now.

Then, on she went focusing on foreign policy.

“How’s that hopey, changey stuff workin’ out for ya?”

“One number we are sure of is the unemployment number. … The list of broken promises is long,” Palin continued, clearly beginning her pitch to people that she’s not the same gal who blew interviews, went rogue, and begged out of being governor, even as she reminded people she was Alaska’s governor.

As for health care, pass “market based solutions,” like allowing people to buy insurance across states, tort reform, the usual.

While making sure to get in energy and her “all of the above” strategy suggestion into the mix.

It’s up to you to make the final judgment, but the biggest applause came when Palin mentioned her special-needs child, talking about all people being welcome.

At the end, once again Sarah invoked Reagan, adding his “shining city.”

As expected, the Tea Party crowd loved her.

At least she had her talking points down, making sure to lead on national security. Because Sarah’s target tonight was Barack Obama, and it wasn’t a coincidence that it sounded like a campaign.

Read full story · Comments { 86 }

Sarah Gets a Studio – Tea Party Gets a PAC

–updated–

Without leaving home, Sarah Palin will be able to reach much of her political base, courtesy of a soon-to-be-built television studio in her living room paid for by her newest media patron, Fox News. From her house in Wasilla, Alaska, Ms. Palin also sends missives to 1.3 million Facebook “fans,” writes newspaper columns, Tweets and signs copies of her book for donors. – Palin, Visible and Vocal, Is Positioned for Variety of Roles

2010_Blizzard-II_Feb 025

Sarah Palin is doing it her way, with new help from Fox. The Palin haters have got to be gnashing their teeth over her continual rising platform. It’s actually quite stunning for someone who was humiliated during a national presidential election, based in good part because of her own unpreparedness, but also naivety that she’d be handled well and gradually broken into the system; then summarily quit an executive political job as governor to start a national political life. At the very least she’s doing it her way. Whatever you want to say about the slim comparisons, Hillary Clinton did it the traditional way by the traditional means. Over fifteen years younger, Palin is walking a road well separate of Clinton. Palin still having a lot to prove if she ever wants to be successful at national office, but making sure no one else is in control of her fate again so far. I’ve been thinking about this a lot and the one thing a woman will have to be ready to do to break out is chart a path unique to who she is, not what the boys’ political club wants. Whatever she ends up doing, right now Sarah is the one sitting pretty, though national political gravitas still eludes her. But given her fan and political base I doubt she cares. We’re heading into a time where anti establishment political types with an “it” persona, independence from traditional structure, but also counter-structural trends, continue to rise. Gravitas is on the way out, as it’s now just interpreted as elitism. Ponder that.

Lots of Tea Party action today. From the Wall Street Journal last night.

A leading organizer of the National Tea Party Convention here announced the launch of the Memphis-based Ensuring Liberty Corporation, a political outfit that will include a political action committee to help fund candidates supported by Tea Party activists.

Mark Scoda, a 55-year-old Memphis businessman and local Tea Party leader, said today he will lead the new effort along with a board of directors that he said he will name next week. The group will have the common goals of the Tea Party Convention, but will not be directly affiliated, he said.

Scoda said the group intends to target House and Senate races this November, in particular the Senate seat held by Democratic Sen. Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, as well as House races in Mississippi, Arkansas, and Tennessee. …

Mr. Tancredo was certainly in his element, which provided no restraint to keep him from humiliating himself.

As for the picture below, nighttime blizzard. Spectacular snowstorm. I’ve lived in the Midwest, New York City, but never seen a snow fall like this one, including the historic fall just this last Christmas. It’s so sticky it’s adhering to everything. Stunningly spectacular. … ps – It’s still snowing, going on 24 hours now.

2010_Blizzard-II_Feb 043-SnowFall

Read full story · Comments { 57 }

Anything Goes


music compliments of WB

MSNBC headline: Palin e-mails reveal a powerful ‘first dude’.

With the Tea Party convention in full swing this weekend, and the Beltway snowed in, can there be any doubt Fox News channel will get plenty of eyes Saturday night?

However, the laugh out loud of the week is the rambling exhale in the Washington Post all about liberal condescension.

This condescension is part of a liberal tradition that for generations has impoverished American debates over the economy, society and the functions of government — and threatens to do so again today, when dialogue would be more valuable than ever.

Honestly, an op-ed from one of American Enterprise Institute’s speakers. How shocking liberal condescension is the topic.

Evidently in all his studies, Mr. Alexander forgot to pay attention to William F. Buckley, who said conservatism is basically defined by what they’re against. So, when you take the Swift Boat veterans, the “birther” wing of the Tea Partiers, cut out the Atwater – Rove branch of the GOP, the homophobic amendments branch made to drive the vote, the anti women’s civil rights branch, all you really have is a bunch of stand up and rail reactionaries. Republicans don’t create ideas and solutions, they oppose them. That’s there m.o. Even Buckley said so.

Enjoy your weekend. The floor is yours.

Read full story · Comments { 24 }

Sen. Shelby Cites ‘National Security’ on Senate Holds

Here’s the beginning of Shelby’s statement, with the rest at TPM:

Sen. Shelby has placed holds on several pending nominees due to unaddressed national security concerns. …

Everything else is just defensive posturing to back up the unprecedented Republican stall by Shelby’s blanket hold, pretty much a Senate first. The move freezes everything in place on Obama’s nominations, calling attention to Shelby’s actions which he’s trying to hide behind “national security.”

It’s the pick up from the Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab skirmish, revolving around Miranda rights being read to him, which seems to be the foundation of a broader election 2010 GOP talking point that started with Scott Brown’s stunning upset in Massachusetts. Sen. Collins was made a fool when she tried to fly the GOP talking points, with the Obama White House ready to aim and fire, with a direct hit:

On Wednesday, Gibbs issued a five-point memo rebutting a series of Republican criticisms. He wrote that senior members of the intelligence community knew that Abdulmutallab was going to be indicted in civilian court and approved of the decision. He also noted that Jose Padilla, a U.S. citizen convicted in 2007 of supporting terrorism, was granted the right to counsel even when he was held as an “enemy combatant” during the Bush administration. “Abdulmutallab has not been offered anything,” Gibbs wrote. – Criticism of Obama on national security likely to remain big issue

Anyway, procedural guru David Waldman explains “holds” in detail.

Evidently, Sen. Shelby is betting that no one will call him on his “national security” veil. I wouldn’t bet on it, as it was Reid’s people who dropped the dime in the first place. But Shelby’s going for it, via his spokesperson:

Shelby’s move comes as Northrop Grumman Corp. is threatening to pull out of the tanker contest on the grounds that the draft bid package is skewed in favor of rival Boeing Co. Should Northrop win the high-stakes competition, Mobile could gain up to 1,500 jobs.

The Defense Department “must recognize” that the package “needs to be significantly and substantively changed,” Graffeo said in the statement. He also charged the administration with holding back money to build an FBI center to analyze terrorist explosive devices.

“If this administration were as worried about hunting down terrorists as it is about the confirmation of low-level political nominations, America would be a safer place,” Graffeo said. …

The part in bold is the framing that tells what’s really going on.

It takes 60 votes to break the hold, otherwise Obama’s federal nominees get frozen out.

Seems fitting as the “snowpocalypse” hits DC, with the government shutting down completely this afternoon. As I tweeted earlier, the meteorologists around the Beltway are awesome. They said it would snow starting at around 10 a.m. this morning and as if hitting an on switch, at around that time it began to snow and it doesn’t look like there’s any letting up.

Just wish they could predict when Shelby’s hardball will turn back on him, as Republicans stopping Democrats from doing any of the people’s business has now hit a tipping point. The Alabama senator betting that tweaking Obama on national security is a good bet no matter what.

With the back drop of the Tea Party convention, as well as the elections that turned Democrats out of Massachusetts and other states, I wonder if people are going to be upset that Republicans have stopped Dems from doing anything. People aren’t very happy with the way Pres. Obama and the Democratic Congress are handling things, so Shelby’s move may actually be praised in some quarters, especially since he’s cloaking it behind national security. Because up is down right now, with the political peanut gallery very content to stop Democrats in their tracks.

How the Democratic leadership handles this and how fast is key.

Obama shouldn’t take any crap from Republicans on national security. They’re all talk and torture, pork and preen. Besides, by this time in Bush’s presidency we’d already been hit, and that came after warnings were ignored. Someone needs to make Shelby eat this.

Read full story · Comments { 21 }

This is Just Retarded

batman_retardedtopic

There’s been a ridiculous back and forth going on that started with Rahm Emanuel calling the liberal activist strategy on health care “f-ing retarded.” This ticked off Sarah Palin, who evidently thinks her cute son Trig is either a liberal, an activist or somehow involved in the health care debate. Then of course, Rush, sensing a moment of supreme carnival opportunity, went on a “retarded” tirade:

“Our political correct society is acting like some giant insult’s taken place by calling a bunch of people who are retards, retards,” Rush said, adding that Rahm’s meeting yesterday with advocates for the mentally handicapped was a “retard summit at the White House.” – Rush Limbaugh

Greg Sargent now has been awarded the highest rhetorical honor, because Sarah Palin has now attacked him through her spokesperson, after he quoted Rush’s “retarded” avalanche:

“Governor Palin believes crude and demeaning name calling at the expense of others is disrespectful.”

Fox has printed Sarah Palin’s attack on Sargent’s Plum Line, which is simply being referred to as the Washington Post.

This whole thing is just retarded. Are we seriously going to call out the language police every time someone utters a sentence? Sarah Palin’s quick draw political correctness is not only insultingly calculated, it’s retarded. But it seems nothing embarrasses Palin, especially when it concerns making molehills mountains, especially since she’s selectively outraged, because she’s judged going after Rush would just be retarded. Some people are above her puny punch.

It makes me want to see how many times I can use the word retarded today. I hate political correctness, have always hated it. When it’s professed by a sanctimonious Republican thinking she has the moral high ground because of a child that wasn’t being cited or referred to in any way in any part of this kerfuffle it’s even more retarded. When it’s obvious said Republican is only directing her outrage at liberals it’s even worse.

Read full story · Comments { 13 }

Senate Symbolism, and Pamela Geller Goes Hunting

–bumped–

Obama makes a joke at his own expense today at the annual prayer breakfast, but as you can see in the video, his laugh isn’t full, but instead an afterthought, because the President knows all too well the dangers underlying the subtext of his material.

Republican Rep. Mark Kirk won the Illinois primary in a walk and is well situated in the general election for Barack Obama’s old Senate seat, going into the race as the front runner. The symbolism will become clear. Kirk’s rise possibly portending something bigger when you look closely.

Could Kirk be AIPAC’s new man in Washington? Perhaps. TPM’s Justin Elliot does an introduction piece on it today. But there is a larger narrative building that makes the right’s rhetoric against Obama even more dangerous, when you consider the larger target of foreign policy, where the Middle East has always been a lightning point.

Open Secrets reveals Rep. Kirk as the number four recipient of big bucks from the pro Israel forces, with only Obama, McCain and Hillary leading him. That’s rather remarkable given the heavy weights in the Senate, of which Kirk is now poised to be one. If you don’t remember, he was one of the leaders against Chas Freeman‘s appointment, an organizing force. If you don’t recall, Mr. Freeman blasted the Israeli right lobby after he pulled his name from nomination, after having been swiftboated by them in a character assassination led by Israeli neocon hawks that evidently believe America’s historic friendship with Israel, as well as our renowned fealty to backing our friend at every turn, is not sufficiently appreciated. A charge that is absolute rubbish.

Anyway, Kirk’s rise to take Obama’s Senate seat is really a tell on what’s been roiling the political bloodstream on the Middle East since Pres. Obama’s speech in Cairo. That there has been much shuttling around regarding negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, but no policy movement whatsoever, as even Stephen Walt suggesting in January that George Mitchell should just resign.

Obama blinked — leaving Mitchell with nothing to do-because he needed to keep sixty senators on board with his health care initiative (that worked out well, didn’t it?), because he didn’t want to jeopardize the campaign coffers of the Democratic Party, and because he knew he’d be excoriated by Israel’s false friends in the U.S. media if he did the right thing. I suppose I ought to be grateful to have my thesis vindicated in such striking fashion, but there’s too much human misery involved on both sides to take any consolation in that. – Time for George Mitchell to resign

The current sag in Pres. Obama’s domestic credibility having larger ramifications than most appreciate, especially with the Congress headed towards a potential cataclysmic earthquake in 2010; traditional voices now openly speculating that not only the House may tip GOP, but the Senate as well. As I don’t do predictions, I’ll let you to speculate the odds on either, though it’s obvious Democrats are in for it as things stand right now.

frontpage_hate

Whereas Kirk is actually a traditional right-wing hawk Republican on all things Israel, never mind that this position has not made Israel any safer over the years, the far right Israeli voices in America are marshaling another type of campaign against moderation and progress targeting Pres. Obama. One that is not only insidiously offensive, but dangerous in the extreme. It is represented well today by a stunning FrontPage post by Robert Spencer, who is pushing pieces by AtlasShrugged’s Pamela Geller, the two of them joining together in a book to be published by Threshold Editions, an imprint of Simon and Schuster entitled, “The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America,” due out in late July 2010. Fittingly, the forward is done by John Bolton (and as some regulars will remember, the coupling of Geller and Bolton became the subject of quite a fracas when I inserted myself in the John-Pamela love fest back in 2006, which resulted in several humorous exchanges with Bolton’s people.).

As of 2005, the “chief editor” of Threshold was Mary Matalin. It’s not Regnery, the behemoth right-wing publisher, which has been behind other Robert Spencer books, but having the imprimatur of Simon and Schuster, which is the publisher usually noted, gives the upcoming and undoubtedly venomous screed to come an aura of respectability. Look for specials from Human Events and WND to come.

As can be seen by perusing Spencer’s post today on FrontPage, as well as Geller’s Holocaust “investigation” connections regarding certain prominent Muslims and including Palestinians, with regular swipes at the progressive rising J Street, these attacks from Israeli hawk wingnut central are inspired by the notion that any engagement with Arabs and Palestinians, let alone Muslims, where their firing line begins, must be stopped to save Israel. A nutty notion, but that’s their oxygen. The prime recipient of their hatred directed at Pres. Obama, whom the Israeli right deems an enemy, because our President dared to have the audacity to challenge conventional U.S. Middle East policy that has gotten Israel nowhere, certainly no safer, doing the unthinkably right thing by demanding new settlements cease. The Israeli press trying mightily to ruin Obama in Israel, not completely succeeding, as my report on polling revealed, thus the entry of the American Israeli hawk right.

The sad reality being that since Obama’s Cairo speech there has been exactly zero progress in the Middle East. Rep. Kirk and his farther fringe friends like Spencer and Geller know Pres. Obama has been stopped short of real progress in Middle East talks, so they’re preemptive attack looking to 2012 has begun. Not that the Spencer-Geller contingent will move the majority, as these people work on the fringes, with Kirk potentially a new Israeli hawk headliner. That he could be in Obama’s old Senate seat offers powerful symbolism if nothing else.

Meanwhile, the Israeli right remains primarily worried about Iran, pushing confrontation, another point of contention over Obama’s policy of engagement.

However, now that Obama’s domestic strength has been weakened, with many believing Middle East progress will escape the promise once instilled in Pres. Obama’s administration, the right is emboldened. Feeling this is the time to swiftboat anyone who believes the facts and hope lie in Israel admitting their wrongs and offering a real deal with the Palestinians. If for no other reason than the alternative to progress is the unthinkable for us all. Though the continued raging over the Goldstone report doesn’t offer much hope.

While Rep. Kirk eyes the Senate, he remains above the fray and among the usual Israel Hawk crowd, his couterparts on the fringe right mounting a renewed anti Obama campaign, with Spencer and Geller doing the dirty work. It’s looking like Jerome Corsi on steroids, and we all know where that one ended, so no one should dismiss the ultimate goal and that they’re starting very early.

Read full story · Comments { 42 }

Out of the Mouth of Rush

I’m a huge supporter of women. What I’m not is a supporter of liberalism. Feminism is what I oppose. Feminism has led women astray. I love the women’s movement especially when I’m walking behind it. – Rush Limbaugh

Isn’t he just charming?

He loves women, just not liberalism. But thinks feminism has “led women astray.” This from a man who’s been married three times, about to get married a fourth time, who continues to call professional women “info babes.”

This line about feminism is continually repeated by the right, which they think is bolstered by the studies that say women are less happy today. Of course, the Phyllis Schlafly crew believe feminism is to blame.

Recently, Marcus Buckingham wrote over at HuffPo on the subject, in conjunction with his books. What’s happening to women’s happiness?

Rush and the right say it’s feminism.

It’s not.

Western American women are for one thing too critical. For another, won’t take responsibility for doing more in their day that actually makes them happy. You also have to choose happiness, which has nothing to do with perfection or achieving everything you want.

But leave it to Rush to opine on something he knows absolutely nothing about.

Read full story · Comments { 17 }