TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Archive | May, 2010

For All Who Serve, Including Gays, Who Deserve To Serve Openly

To all the men and women serving our Armed Forces, but also the families who support them and do without, a grateful nation can never repay your sacrifice.


picture via Huffington Post

For those of you following the BP blowout catastrophe, I’ve got a post up on Huffington Post, which is worth a read. On a personal note, I can’t help but wonder what my late brother-in-law might have to say about the current BP calamity. I come from a point of knowledge and interest on what’s happening in the Gulf. Anyway….

Consider this a topic free for all, anything goes. Anyone having comments on the Israel – Freedom Flotilla carnage can post them here.

One interesting political note on DADT.  Bill Browning has a copy of an email reportedly sent out to “Troops.” Via Browning the upshot is, as I wrote when the news first broke of a “deal,” that DADT repeal is anything but sure.

Secretary of the Army John McHugh and Army Chief of Staff Gen George W. Casey sent an e-mail to troops over the weekend about Congress’ “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” repeal compromise. The legislation, which has been passed by the House and a Senate subcommittee, would give McHugh_Casey.jpgauthority to repeal DADT to the President, the Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff, and the Secretary of Defense after the military issues a formal report in December.

In the e-mail, McHugh and Casey complain about Congress’s efforts to repeal DADT, saying, “such an action taken before the men and women of the Armed Forces were consulted could be seen as a reversal of our commitment to hear the views of our Soldiers and Families before the law was repealed.”

They go on to implore soldiers to tell others to “resist that urge to think that this is a ‘done deal’.” They hint strongly that Congress’ actions aren’t important since the military has to sign off on the repeal as well. The two also ask officers to tell “your soldiers and your Families [sic]” that “the current law remains in effect. [...]

The floor is yours on this holiday. Whatever is on your mind… while I share my Memorial Day art that is flown from our balcony, no matter where we reside. What is not seen, because if would hit the flora, is a section of the art where “WE THE PEOPLE” is emblazoned. Memorial Day should be a moment in time where people reflect on this primal force. Let the people rein.

Read full story · Comments { 25 }

On the Eve of Netanyahu’s Visit to White House, IDF Kills 10 on ‘Freedom Flotilla’

[...] The other possible reason is that the far rightwing government of Binyamin Netanyahu and his foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman gave a green light to the commandos to respond with excessive force. That is, the deaths and woundings may have been a brutally frank warning to any future Gaza aid activists that they are taking their lives in their hands if they plan any more flotillas to help the Palestinians. The Israeli far right may have felt that there was otherwise a danger that in a few months there would be an even bigger flotilla and that eventually the blockade of Gaza would be broken. - Juan Cole

BREAKING (10:00 am): AP reports Israeli prime minister’s office says he’s canceling White House visit to deal with Gaza crisis.


more at Huffington Post

According to the reports, Israel IDF fired on the ship carrying Gaza aid in international waters killing at least 10 people and causing pandemonium among Palestinians and outrage in Muslim communities. According to the New York Times, “according to the official Wafa news,” Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas called the Israeli actions “a massacre.” More:

The Israeli Navy raided a flotilla carrying thousands of tons of supplies for Gaza in international waters on Monday morning, killing at least 10 people, according to the Israeli military and activists traveling with the flotilla. Some Israeli media reports put the death toll higher.

The incident drew widespread international condemnation, with Israeli envoys summoned to explain their country’s actions in several European countries.

The criticism offered a propaganda coup to Israel’s foes, particularly the Hamas group that holds sway in Gaza, and damaged its ties to Turkey, one of its most important Muslim partners and the unofficial sponsor of the Gaza-bound convoy. Ankara recalled its ambassador to Israel and Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan cut short a visit to Latin America to return. [...]

The actions of the Israeli government continue to make no sense, especially where Gaza is concerned. They are courting mass condemnation through this aggressive act, with Turkey, once a valuable ally in a sea of hostility moving further away from Israel.

Anyone believing that the Netanyahu government wants “peace” is whistling past the diplomatic graveyard.

Israel’s prime minister has expressed his support for the militray’s actions in a deadly raid against an aid flotilla sailing to the blockaded Gaza Strip. Benjamin Netanyahu’s office says he spoke Monday to top Israeli diplomatic and security officials by telephone from Canada and voiced his “full backing” for the military. – AP

David Kurtz has a running breakdown of the timeline on the incident and links that take you through the latest developments.

This post has been updated.

Read full story · Comments { 57 }

Hell Freezes! Our Lady with Pearls Praises Pres. Clinton

…He’s spending the holiday weekend in Chicago when he should be commemorating Memorial Day here with the families of troops killed in battle and with veterans at Arlington Cemetery. [...] … F.D.R. achieved greatness not by means of imposing his temperament and intellect on the world but by reacting to what the world threw at him. [...] … Instead of getting Bill Clinton to offer Joe Sestak a job, Obama should be offering Clinton one. Bill would certainly know how to gush at a gusher gone haywire. Let him resume a cameo role as Feeler in Chief. The post is open.Maureen Dowd

No one is more acerbically banal than Maureen Dowd when she is lobbing word bombs at Bill Clinton. She’s made a living doing it for a long time. So to read her not only praising Bill Clinton, but suggesting Pres. Obama offer him a job to save his cold self is startling. It’s like waking up in an alternate universe finding out Hillary is president and the country is powered by nukes.

…and if that’s not enough for you, get a load of Frank Rich today. The New York times headline asks and answers a question many people are positing: Obama’s Katrina? Maybe Worse. Unfortunately for Rich, the reality that Pres. Obama hasn’t a clue what to do caused his column today to turn into a word puzzle of contorted political panic. Rich isn’t sure how to blame Bush-Cheney, while reconciling that Pres. Obama foolishly didn’t launch his own task force, as I explained yesterday through the aid of oil experts, just in case BP did what they do best, fail utterly.

I could care less about comparisons, Katrina or otherwise. I’ve been railing from the start that Pres. Obama and the feds had no plan beyond putting BP on point, then applying the hope rule. It was a colossal mistake that is compounded by the gravity of the situation.

But if Maureen Dowd is praising former Pres. Bill Clinton, while Frank Rich is having a rhetorical breakdown, I’d say Pres. Obama’s political grace time is fast approaching empty.

Read full story · Comments { 32 }

Mr. President, You Can’t Trust BP

edited & updated version cross-posted at Huffington Post


via Huffington Post

We’re now all caught in a horror film entitled Waiting for BP.

The whole problem with Pres. Obama’s continued reliance on BP is that it simply won’t get the job done, because contrary to the mantra coming from federal officials, BP simply cannot be trusted. They have been in a place of epic corporate damage control that prevents them from being transparent about how this blowout happened in the first place. Everything from that point is mitigating the damage that can be seen.

Gov. Jindal should be given every resource he needs and then some. Arguing with him on technicalities of Corp of Engineers is petty and small. Give him everything, sand barriers, anything else.

From the New York Times.

Internal documents from BP show that there were serious problems and safety concerns with the Deepwater Horizon rig far earlier than those the company described to Congress last week.

The problems involved the well casing and the blowout preventer, which are considered critical pieces in the chain of events that led to the disaster on the rig.

The documents show that in March, after several weeks of problems on the rig, BP was struggling with a loss of “well control.” And as far back as 11 months ago, it was concerned about the well casing and the blowout preventer. [...]

I also find the juvenile back and forth between Robert Gibbs and James Carville not only beneath the debate that needs to take place, but nakedly political on the part of Gibbs. The only thing that will help Pres. Obama is if this leak is stopped. Saying that Carville, who is on the ground in Louisiana, doesn’t have the facts to weigh in is insulting, elitist, and arrogant.

What the White House does not get is that all anyone is seeing is BP’s floundering. There is no federal effort that Obama is overseeing that offers another point of information, study or fact gathering that can lead the public to believe Pres. Obama is in charge. People need to see Obama’s leadership in action. Watching BP fail over and over again is going to start sticking if he’s not careful.

Oil experts I’ve emailed or with whom I’ve had dialogue offered some suggestions, which I believe would make a huge difference. That’s because it begins with getting BP off point. I’ve compiled some, which includes my own interpretations of what was written or said, to prove that it’s not that hard for the Administration to show visible signs of leadership that would have an impact immediately.

Aid to businesses: Obama needs to get the ball rolling on economic damages immediately. This takes BP, Transocean, Halliburton and Cameron International Corp (who supplied the rig) working together. Get the money flowing now. Immediately. This should be Obama’s number one priority. Use last year’s tax return as jumping off point.

Plugging the well: Obama needs to assemble a task force of oil and drilling company CEOs beyond BP. These individuals will come up with a plan of action beyond “top kill.” This group will also decide what role BP will play. A spokesperson from the group will report.

Clean up the gulf: All the governors of the states impacted, plus scientists and environmentalists in another group. Same thing as above, get a plan of action together, one person report.

Wildlife and bird rescue: International Bird Rescue Research Center (IBRRC) needs all the help they can get. Pick a team, the best team should be assembled, plan of action, one person reporting to Obama, as above.

Once we get into next week, if BP fails, which I’m expecting, Pres. Obama’s problems rise exponentially. People have to see the feds doing something. They need evidence of teams responding beyond BP. The time is now.


UDPATED: It’s now time everyone remember what Matthew Simmons said on Dylan Ratigan’s show several times this week: “… The thing you need to be terrified about is there might be no way to put this out other than waiting for the giant oil (inaudible) to deplete, which would be 9,000 days. So what they’re already worried about is that it’s going to take (the oil) out of the Gulf of Mexico.”

The evidence was out there from the start, according to experts, including those I was engaging, that BP was not the company that could solve the catastrophe they’d caused by what is likely criminal corporate malfeasance. The latest statement from BP proves what these experts have said from the start; people who were out there, but the Obama administration chose not to tap, because they put all of their hopes on BP. As we all know well by now, hope is not a plan. Now we’re getting “we tried” from BP, when the worst was foretold by their negligence from the start, which is coming out in documents. The incompetence is overwhelming on all fronts. Once it surfaces that Pres. Obama has no plan b, but that this is only going to be oil containment, his problems are going to multiply exponentially. Not having multiple options already in motion is simply horrific crisis management. An epic failure that will hobble Pres. Obama if he doesn’t start issuing directives, getting small tankers at the very least in the area, as well as putting the options I listed above in motion immediately.

“I can say we tried. But what I can also say is this scares everybody, the fact that we can’t make this well stop flowing, or haven’t succeeded in that so far,” Doug Suttles, BP’s chief operating officer, said in a late-day news conference.BP must fall back on oil spill containment strategy

This essay has been bumped and edited for update.

Read full story · Comments { 30 }

It’s Sunday, So Here’s Your News Round-Up!

Good morning! Some links to go with your morning coffee…

But first, on this day in history: on May 30, 1431, Joan of Arc, condemned as a heretic, was burned at the stake in Rouen, France.

~Here is a round-up of who will be on the Sunday talk shows today (h/t Firedoglake).

~As everyone now knows by now, the “top kill” failed to stop the oil from gushing into the Gulf of Mexico and BP has now turned its attention to placing a containment cap on the leak, something which they had previously tried but which also failed. Unfortunately, BP is saying it could take four to seven days just to get the cap in place.

~Speaking of BP, legal experts and conservationists have been analyzing BP’s response to the oil spill and it should come as no surprise to anyone, except perhaps the White House, that every step the corporation has taken has been with two goals in mind- limit their legal liability down the road and protect the interests of their shareholders.

~After Obama’s trip to the Gulf on Friday, reports surfaced that BP bussed in temporary workers prior to his arrival to spruce up the place and make it look like BP had things under control, only to have all the workers leave immediately after Obama left. The independent contractor (of course) hired by BP to do coastal clean-up, is denying those reports. The question is, what happened to all the workers?

~As of 10:06a.m. today we will have spent one trillion dollars on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. So says Representative John Conyers.

~A sad milestone- the the 1,000th GI killed in the Afghan War was Texas Marine Jacob C. Leitch. He had been injured in a roadside bomb and had begged to rejoin his fellow troops on the front lines. He was killed this week when he stepped on a land mine in the Helmand Province.

~Writing in today’s Washington Post, Jessica Velenti analyzes the new strategy of Sarah Palin- specifically, how she is incorporating feminist catch-phrases into her speeches in order to rally more women to the conservative cause. This is an about-face from her earlier position as VP candidate where she told Katie Couric she didn’t want to be “labeled.”

~The House voted to extend jobless benefits on Friday and the Senate….went on vacation. This will cause the benefits to lapse five days before the Senate returns from their ten day recess. Ok, raise your hand if YOU get ten days paid vacation off for Memorial Day? Didn’t think so. Indulge me for a moment, but now is hardly the time, in the midst of the disaster in the Gulf Coast, for the Democrats to turn their backs on people who don’t have jobs because there are no jobs to be had.

~The U.S. military has released a report finding that the operators of predator drones were responsible for the deaths of 23 Afghan civilians earlier this year.

~Roy Ashburn, a California legislator who made a career of being the anti-gay defender of family values, is now changing his tune. On Friday he spoke out on the California Senate floor in support of gay rights. As a side note, Mr. Ashburn came out as gay after being arrested for drunken driving upon leaving a gay club. Here’s the object lesson- he says he was so ardently anti-gay in his politics to try to hide the fact that he was gay.

~Apparently some on the political right are having a kitten over the fact that a Muslim community center will be built close to Ground Zero in NYC. Originally it appeared the opposition was comprised of a small group of Tea Party-types but now the circle is widening to include other members of the right, with the Washington Times and others chiming in.

~Rand Paul continues to be the best one man reality show on television and the internet. A video has surfaced of an interview he gave to a Russian news outlet after his primary victory, which has him claiming that children born to illegal immigrants should not be granted citizenship. So much for his strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution. Perhaps given his views of civil rights, he wants to pretend that the Fourteenth Amendment doesn’t exist?

~A report issued by the Guantanamo Review Task Force has found that the vast majority of the prisoners at Gitmoare low-level fighters and some have no known link to terrorism whatsoever.

~Politico thinks they smell a Clinton scandal brewing. That’s debatable.

Read full story · Comments { 11 }

Bill Clinton: Lincoln’s ‘opponent is not her opponent.’

…Clinton has become the “Michael Clayton” of the Obama White House, a roving, always on-call fixer who lends his political skills to help Obama and the Democrats in tough situations. Clinton is campaigning and raising money in places where Obama is less (or less than) welcome. And, as was revealed Friday, he has been an intermediary on sensitive, off-the-grid conversations with candidates such as Rep. Joe Sestak (D-Pa.), whom he tried — on behalf of the White House — to talk out of running for the Senate. … – Bill Clinton has evolved into Obama’s Mr. Fix-It

Former Pres. Bill Clinton went to bat for Blanche yesterday in front of what is reported to be a much smaller crowd than he usually draws. He played the anger card, but also chastised outside groups.

“If you want to be used that way, have at it,’ he said to about 200 Democrats at Philander Smith College, speaking without notes for 20 minutes. With a detailed recitation of Lincoln’s work on behalf of Arkansas down to the jobs she saved at a manufacturer in Ft. Smith, Clinton exhorted voters to not direct their discontent at her.

“If you want somebody to channel your anger, don’t vote for her,” Clinton said. “If you want somebody to get up and go to work and change your life for the better, you should vote for her.”.

One thing you can say about Bill Clinton campaigning for Blanche Lincoln, he’s not scared to get in the game, even if there’s a 50-50 chance he gets skinned. Halter is the future, with Lincoln representing yesterday’s ideas. His loyalty to Mrs. Lincoln is admirable in politics, when tactical play rules and friends don’t hold much sway. However, it’s unwise.

Unfortunately for Lincoln, Pres. Bill Clinton’s language misses the target by a mile. Using words that focus on powerful liberal groups that include labor unions, Mr. Clinton’s charge that these interests are trying to punish “Democrats who don’t toe the party line” is not only wrong on the politics, but takes on a central tenet of the Democratic Party: unions. He’s obviously been spending too much time with Mark Penn over the years.

He pounded the podium with Lincoln at his side, warning that national liberal and labor groups wanted to make her a “poster child” in the June 8 Senate run-off to send a message about what happens to Democrats who don’t toe the party line. [...]

If Lincoln wins it will be because of Pres. Clinton’s push for her. However, if he can’t make the difference it will be another blow against the Democratic elite, which coming right after Obama’s backing Specter, only to lose, will resound loudly.

The Tea Party isn’t the only group rising up against their daddy. Progressives are, too.

Read full story · Comments { 16 }

Peggy Noonan Channels Rand Paul

I wonder if the president knows what a disaster this is not only for him but for his political assumptions. His philosophy is that it is appropriate for the federal government to occupy a more burly, significant and powerful place in America—confronting its problems of need, injustice, inequality. But in a way, and inevitably, this is always boiled down to a promise: “Trust us here in Washington, we will prove worthy of your trust.” Then the oil spill came and government could not do the job, could not meet need, in fact seemed faraway and incapable: “We pay so much for the government and it can’t cap an undersea oil well!”He Was Supposed to Be CompetentThe spill is a disaster for the president and his political philosophy.

Stuff happens, America. Don’t blame BP. Oh, and by the way, you’re on your own. This philosophy will work for Tea Party politicians like Rand Paul until a catastrophe hits Kentucky. As for Noonan, the latest Tea Party ranter, it will take something more personal. You know, like a bug in her scone.

Nobody has been more on point in their critique of Pres. Obama’s handling of BP’s blowout than myself. But to read Peggy Noonan’s words you’d think she would prefer putting BP in charge of the entire energy policy of the United States. Get a load of this opening: I don’t see how the president’s position and popularity can survive the oil spill. It’s not Newt Gingrich calling Pres. Obama Stalin, but it’s close.

Ms. Noonan has simply lost her political touch, never mind that she was hoisted on her own fact-free rhetoric by repeating that the EPA head actually attended a New York fundraiser as BP’s oil disaster widened. It’s bad enough that the Obama administration had dueling fundraisers planned, but the one to which Noonan refers was, thankfully, canceled. I only wish Pres. Obama’s was as well.

In fact, Ms. Noonan gets the facts on government, politics, business, and Obama exactly wrong.

BP’s criminal malfeasance actually proves the need for a strong federal government when it comes to protecting the American people from businesses that have no social conscience.

BLOOMBERG: The 1918 Migratory Bird Treaty Act protects fowl. The Refuse Act, part of the 1899 Rivers and Harbors Act, outlaws industrial discharge in navigable waters. OK, they are both misdemeanors punishable by minor fines, but stay with me here.

Even a misdemeanor conviction would remove the $75 million cap on damages that the Oil Pollution Act sets. BP says it will pay all legitimate damages from the spill, regardless of the cap, but fisherman still suffering from the Exxon Valdez spill 20 years ago would urge caution in believing such promises.

Bumping it up a notch by showing negligence, prosecutors can win a conviction under the Clean Water Act, and there’s every reason to believe that can be shown here. Negligence means an absence of due care, say in keeping the blowout preventer working to, um, prevent a catastrophic blowout, for example. [...]

Pres. Obama’s political philosophy is not “a disaster.” What has been proven a colossal catastrophe is the deregulation that began under Ms. Noonan’s boss, former Pres. Ronald Reagan. From Wall Street to the oil industry to the media, especially our airwaves, no one was more responsible in kick-starting the deregulation fervor on the right than Reagan.

Pres. Obama has made innumerable errors since that first conference call by Thad Allen, on which I reported. The first was leaving BP on point. No one will convince me otherwise, especially after email conversations I’ve had with oil experts. BP has also continually proven my point by lying to the public, keeping the press away from the beaches where the oil has had the most impact, as well as shifting numbers to cover their corporate bottom line. I cannot put it any simpler than to say you simply can’t trust BP. They are not capable of transparency and open communication, so Pres. Obama putting our fate and his political hide on the line is absurd.

Com. Thad Allen is of impeccable competence, but he can only do what the Dept. of Interior and the feds allow; one job continually to keep civic and federal responsibility separate. There is just not enough visible task force grouping for each impacted zone in the disaster’s wake. Joe Scarborough did a good job with Allen this morning on “Morning Joe,” asking him about the lake of oil I’ve been talking about on the BBC for the past days. All Allen could offer is that NOAA is now studying it and he’s not sure of the final analysis. NOAA has failed miserably in being on the job, which proves just how unprepared our government is. EPA is MIA.

One dangerous section in Noon’s column amidst the drivel does, however, stand out:

What continues to fascinate me is Mr. Obama’s standing with Democrats. They don’t love him. Half the party voted for Hillary Clinton, and her people have never fully reconciled themselves to him. But he is what they have. They are invested in him. In time—after the 2010 elections go badly—they are going to start to peel off. The political operative James Carville, the most vocal and influential of the president’s Gulf critics, signaled to Democrats this week that they can start to peel off. He did it through the passion of his denunciations.

There are indeed some Clinton supporters who “have never fully reconciled themselves to him.” I just happen not to be one of them. But in the climate we’re in, as a political analyst, when I tell the truth as I see it, people see what they choose to see, which invariably leads into idiotic ramblings questioning my loyalties. So let me be clear yet again. I have no loyalty to any politician; with my only focus being the truth as I can gather it, digest it, convey it, as I see it.

As for Ms. Noonan’s notion that Mr. Carville has sent some signal Democrats “can start to peel off” from Obama, it’s ludicrous. People are sufficiently disgusted with the federal government and “Washington,” but also Congress, that they need no help. Pres. Obama allowing BP to run the show down in the Gulf simply proves perceptions that began years ago under the feckless presidency of George W. Bush.

The strongest message from Noonan’s column on the BP blowout should be to Democrats. We’ve got a group of politicians who have been far too timid about regulations, whom Noonan champions. Building up federal agencies to combat corporate marauders is in the people’s interest and why we pay taxes. The handling of the BP catastrophe proves many things, but not that we need less government.

It’s incomprehensible that we now have “small government” conservatives and Tea Party hacks railing about what government should be doing, when they’re the ones who want to strangle it. If you think things are bad now in the Gulf, and they are, imagine it if “small government” conservatives, the ones who have no respect for the actual role in government, would do if Peggy got her way.

But at least Ms. Noonan can finally relax, take off her establishment blue, and settle in with the folks. She’s gone Tea Party.

Read full story · Comments { 23 }

Bill Clinton Intermediary, but Sestak Navy Sect. Job Rumor False

–Sestak statement added below–

Greg Sargent was the first to break the story.

Bottom line: nothing here, put away the popcorn.

Now, I’m a regular watcher of “Morning Joe.” So, I was cringing every time Scarborough began ranting about Sestak being offered the Sect. of Navy job. Chuck Todd did his best to keep Joe Scarborough, as well as Mika Brzezinski, from leaning too far forward on this story. They ignored him. Mika is supposed to be a seasoned journalist, so she really has no excuse. As for Joe, he should know that just because a politician demurs from addressing the issue you want answered doesn’t mean the assumption you’re implying is true. Joe Sestak never at any time answered in the affirmative to the SecNav query Joe kept pushing. Even in a very contentious back and forth with Chuck Todd, they wouldn’t listen to reason.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


I’ve interviewed Mr. Sestak on multiple occasions. (Interestingly, so have Joe and Mika.) As I wrote earlier, there was no way I believed he would be involved with anything remotely illegal or unseemly. If he’s guilty of anything it’s being too honest, but also a little contrarian, which has gotten him in trouble before, because he didn’t like the big-footing of the White House. Sestak was committed to his run for Senate, period.

White House sent out a memorandum to members of the media, with this the bottom line as far as I’m concerned:

… White House staff did not discuss these options (Sect. of Navy, Uncompensated Advisory Board Options) with Congressman Sestak. The White House Chief of Staff (Rahm Emanuel) enlisted the support of former President Clinton who agreed to raise with Congressman Sestak options of service on a Presidential or other Senior Executive Branch Advisory Board. Congressman Sestak declined the suggested alternatives, remaining committed to his Senate candidacy. – Memorandum from White House Counsel Robert Bauer

As for Pres. Bill Clinton’s involvement, anyone surprised that Mr. Emanuel would enlist him to go to Joe Sestak, a Hillary primary backer, especially after the Obama backed Arlen Specter, as is customary in the support the incumbent mode of the Big Two parties, is simply naive.

The White House memorandum was specific as to why they reached out:

… Efforts were made in June and July of 2009… .. which would avoid a divisive Senate primary, allow him to retain his seat in the House, and provide him with an opportunity for additional service to the public in a high-level advisory capacity for which he was highly qualified.

It’s not like the Obama White House pulled a John McCain, offering a position to someone unready and unqualified for the job.

There is nothing inappropriate in Pres. Clinton’s outreach or the White House wanting to keep Sestak in his House seat, which is a tough win for Democrats. That’s pure Rahm, who knows these races.

To the rumor Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski were huffing and puffing about all this week, that Sestak was offered the SecNav job, the White House council simply said: “This is false.”

UPDATE: Joe Sestak’s statement:

“Last summer, I received a phone call from President Clinton. During the course of the conversation, he expressed concern over my prospects if I were to enter the Democratic primary for U.S. Senate and the value of having me stay in the House of Representatives because of my military background. He said that White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel had spoken with him about my being on a Presidential Board while remaining in the House of Representatives. I said no. I told President Clinton that my only consideration in getting into the Senate race or not was whether it was the right thing to do for Pennsylvania working families and not any offer. The former President said he knew I’d say that, and the conversation moved on to other subjects.

“There are many important challenges facing Pennsylvania and the rest of the country. I intend to remain focused on those issues and continue my fight on behalf of working families.”

Read full story · Comments { 37 }

Pres. Obama and Sect. Clinton, National Security as Good as It Gets

[...] Wars over ideology have given way to wars over religious, ethnic, and tribal identity; nuclear dangers have proliferated; inequality and economic instability have intensified; damage to our environment, food insecurity, and dangers to public health are increasingly shared; and the same tools that empower individuals to build enable them to destroy. … – Obama’s National Security Strategy.

The view of Pres. Obama’s National Security Strategy, that it’s “Bush lite” opposed to “real change,” seems totally misguided. I certainly never heard Mr. Bush talking about making sure we live up to America’s values. Climate change? Never. Dr. Susan Rice is no John Bolton, with Sect. Clinton an engaged force of change for State. DemocracyArsenal has more here and here.

The story late yesterday of Clinton calls for unified national-security budget is more of what’s different about the Obama-Biden era compared to Bush-Cheney. Sect. Clinton’s modus operandi is that with this strategy Congress can’t pick it apart to starve what they don’t want to fund. For too long military has had the most money, with other aspects of our national security structure going without. Remember during Pres. Bush? State was a step child. Not so under Sect. Clinton.

“We have to start looking at a national-security budget,” Clinton said at the Brookings Institution Thursday. “We cannot look at a defense budget, a State Department budget, and a USAID budget without defense overwhelming the combined efforts of the other two, and without us falling back into the old stovepipes that I think are no longer relevant for the challenges of today.”

Clinton made all the usual arguments for why State needs more money, including the need to be present everywhere and the increased role diplomats and civilian advisors are playing in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. She also pointed out that even top Pentagon leaders are arguing for full funding of the State Department’s budget request, which faces a lot of congressional scrutiny this year in light of the constrained fiscal and economic atmosphere.

[...]“Part of the reason I brought [Lew] in is because I knew when Jack headed OMB during the Clinton administration, State would come in with their budget, and AID would come in with their budget, and OMB would always play them off of each other,” she said. “It was the easiest thing in the world to get money out of the 150 account [the international affairs budget]. They would come in and say ‘Oh no, diplomats!’ and then ‘Oh no, development!” and OMB would go, ‘Great, take it and give it to someone else.’ We are trying to avoid that.” …

More on Pres. Obama’s National Security Strategy (via Laura Rozen).

[...] Our country possesses the attributes that have supported our leadership for decades—sturdy alliances, an unmatched military, the world’s largest economy, a strong and evolving democracy, and a dynamic citizenry. Going forward, there should be no doubt: the United States of America will continue to underwrite global security—through our commitments to allies, partners, and institutions; our focus on defeating al-Qa’ida and its affiliates in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and around the globe; and our determination to deter aggression and prevent the proliferation of the world’s most dangerous weapons. As we do,we must recognize that no one nation—no matter how powerful—can meet global challenges alone.

As we did after World War II, America must prepare for the future, while forging cooperative approaches among nations that can yield results. Our national security strategy is, therefore, focused on renewing American leadership so that we can more effectively advance our interests in the 21st century. We will do so by building upon the sources of our strength at home, while shaping an international order that can meet the challenges of our time. This strategy recognizes the fundamental connection between our national security, our national competitiveness, resilience, and moral example. And it reaffirms America’s commitment to pursue our interests through an international system in which all nations have certain rights and responsibilities. …

Next week, as June begins, Pres. Obama will welcome Prime Minister Netanyahu, sort of a re-do after the last visit than ended up with everyone looking petty. Then on June 9th, Pres. Obama will greet Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas at the White House. Look for photo ops on both of these, as Rahm Emanuel is driving the make-up session between the White House and Israel, whose relationship has been uneven, at best. The visit of Mr. Abbas should remind everyone that there are two equal partners in the Middle East process talks, which neither party is working to forward beyond process to actual manifestation of a Palestinian state on the road to peace.

Read full story · Comments { 16 }

DADT Repeal Passes House – Senate Bill Out of Committee


via Huffington Post

This is nowhere near done, as the Republicans, led by John McCain, are looking for any excuse to turn this at Democrats in the 2010 elections.

From the New York Times:

… The House vote was 234 to 194, with 229 Democrats and 5 Republicans in favor, after an emotionally charged debate. Opposed were 168 Republicans and 26 Democrats.

[...] Separately on Thursday, the Senate Armed Services Committee approved a similar measure allowing the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell.”

[...] Like the House amendment, the Senate measure would allow Pentagon leaders to revoke the ban 60 days after the military study group completes its report and Mr. Obama, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, certify that it will not hamper military readiness and effectiveness or “unit cohesion.”

Mr. Obama and Mr. Gates favor repealing the ban, as does Admiral Mullen, who, in testimony before the Armed Services Committee in February, called for a repeal.

But chiefs of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines have objected. …

Sen. James Webb, my senator, voted against the measure, with Sen. Joe Lieberman leading the charge to repeal DADT.

Ass of the hour was Rep. Mike Pence who said, “to advance a liberal social agenda” and demanded that Congress “put its priorities in order.”

Yeah, because giving men and women who are fighting and dying for their country equal rights and full freedoms it just, you know, whacked. Honestly, where do the Republicans get these cretins?

Thanks to Rep. Patrick Murphy, who muscled this one through for the troops, along with Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s leadership. That it’s happening near Memorial Day weekend makes me weak in the knees.

Read full story · Comments { 9 }

Playing Political Catch Up

Just wondering, but has anyone seen the EPA anywhere since BP’s blowout? We’ve got the head of the woman who “inherited” the mess at MMS, about which Pres. Obama didn’t even know the details when he did his press conference. However, the Environmental Protection Agency is MIA.

For the Republicans this is mission accomplished. That Democrats continue to allow it’s emasculation, as fisherman and workers in clean-up crews fall ill is political malpractice.

But looming beyond Pres. Obama’s political catch up is a lake of oil that no one is talking about, though I wrote about it when the story broke. It has been described as 6 miles wide and 22 miles long, at a depth of 3,300 ft. The first to mention this “massive plume of oil” on cable was Dylan Ratigan, once again having Matt Simmons on his show.

Right now everyone is dealing with what’s in front of them, none of it pretty.

Matt Simmons said today that NOAA only today took a boat out to survey the massive lake of oil, which didn’t just appear. Why weren’t they there earlier?

And someone still has to explain why tankers aren’t being sent to the Gulf to help suck up the oil.

Pres. Obama didn’t add much today, frankly, because it’s just so late for him to show he’s engaged, especially when he wasn’t even aware of the details of the head of MMS stepping down. The irony of being in charge while not knowing something so important was lost on the President. Let’s hope he made the people of Louisiana and the wider Gulf region feel better. At least he interjected some humanity into the dreadful situation that goes well beyond the “top kill” efforts of BP.

Something awful is lurking beyond.

There is a lake of oil that foreshadows something potentially very grave yet to break. In fact, Mr. Simmons, who has been right on everything so far, said it could be that BP is actually working on a smaller leak, while the real damage lurks at another point BP hasn’t even bothered to turn their attention to yet.

Pres. Obama tried very hard to instill confidence in the federal government, but also the work of BP, while he took responsibility. However, just today on air BP representatives talked about 30 acres of wetlands, which a Florida University scientist on MSNBC said was actually at least 3,000 acres. Be careful what you believe from BP. By now we should all have learned they are not to be trusted. That Pres. Obama continues to put his faith in them is the most troublesome detail to date.

Read full story · Comments { 18 }

Will this Woman Help Elect Harry Reid?



Rand Paul, meet your political bookend, Sherry Angle.

Who is she? She wants to be a Nevada senator, but she may instead help to re-elect Harry Reid.

Angle’s idea of prison reform is for “female inmates to enter a drug rehabilitation program devised by Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard, an idea she still defends.”

This is one time I’m cheering for the Club for Growth, which along with the Tea Party, is slowly but surely pushing the Republican Party off the political cliff.

From Huffington Post:

“I am the tea party,” said Angle, a 60-year-old former Nevada lawmaker.

With early voting under way for the June 8 primary, Angle has nearly erased Lowden’s double-digit lead in recent polls, thanks in part to endorsements from the Tea Party Express and other conservative groups, including the anti-tax Club for Growth. Lowden, a former state senator, has stumbled after she suggested people might barter for health care using chickens and she faced financial questions about the use of a leased bus.

Club for Growth began airing an ad statewide Wednesday that calls Angle a fiscal conservative and common-sense fighter and argues that Lowden supports huge spending increases and that she backed Reid.

The Tea Party candidates of 2010 remind me of kids at a day care center with no supervision. They’re sort of like wacky Jim Traficant, without the mainstream facade.

Hey, and speaking of Rand Paul, since firing his campaign manager and shaking up his staff, he’s been awfully quiet. The good news for Paul is that he’s cemented his base; the bad news is that he needs independents to win and they’re not so sure about him right now.

Read full story · Comments { 7 }

Obama: ‘Where I was wrong is in my belief that the oil companies had their act together when it came to worst case scenarios.’

TM NOTE: Will be on the BBC’s World Today talking about Pres. Obama and the BP blowout later tonight.
–updated–


Full coverage at Huffington Post

Marine scientists have discovered a massive new plume of what they believe to be oil deep beneath the Gulf of Mexico, stretching 22 miles from the leaking wellhead northeast toward Mobile Bay, Alabama.New, giant sea oil plume seen in Gulf


Pres. Obama’s opening statement.

Throughout the press conference, Pres. Obama has used “federal government” and “we,” making a point to distance himself personally from what’s being done, going on and the decisions being made. It is a very odd tactic by a president, obviously attempting to keep himself from being attached to BP’s blowout, but who’s job it is by statute to enforce the laws of the land.

“I am confident that the federal gov. has acted consistently with a sense of urgency.” – Pres. Obama

Meanwhile, Fox News, CNN and CNBC all showed a split screen of Obama and the oil spilling out into the Gulf.

As for Pres. Obama saying his critics “don’t know the facts,” I beg to differ. I was on the first conference call Thad Allen when I believed they had a handled on this situation. Today’s press conference brought Pres. Obama and the federal gov. up to today, but there are still questions. For instance, why aren’t tankers, if supertankers can’t maneuver, which is what reports are saying, being dispatched to help with the oil clean-up? What about this new “massive oil plume.” Obama got caught up, hopefully smoothing out the optics, but he’s nowhere near over the perception that the federal government, under Pres. Obama, has massively misjudged what was needed to be done, as well as the problem with having BP on point, who is still low-balling oil estimates, with transparency nowhere in sight.

It wasn’t until the close that Obama got personal, talking of “soul searching,” offering an anecdote about when he was shaving and Malia knocked on the door to ask, “did you plug the hole, daddy.” Pres. Obama then talking about the “incredible bounty” that we are charged to protect. Then finally, after the entire press conference of the “federal government” and “we,” Obama steps up to say, “I take responsibility. … The federal government is fully engaged and I am fully engaged.” It took him 38 days and a full press conference to finally evolve to these words at the very end, something that was obviously very difficult for him to say.

The fact remains that if the federal gov. has been in charge from the beginning, Pres. Obama’s job of directing that effort has been a failure up to this point, simply because it took so long to get anything close to a solution in place.

The press, but especially Republicans, are already swarming about the fact that Obama seemed not to be aware of MMS head “resigning,” while also saying he’d heard she had. I’ll let them fight over that one.

This news of a “massive new plume of oil” is the backdrop of Pres. Obama’s press conference. It comes amidst deepening criticism for his lack of leadership since BP’s blowout. In politics, if you’re asking the Is this Obama’s Katrina? question, the answer is moot. The good news is that BP’s “top kill” efforts are reportedly working.

However, the report that scientists have now found a “massive” new plume of oil suggests worse dangers that BP has not even begun to address.

I’ve uploaded a clip from Dylan Ratigan’s show yesterday, because Matt Simmons, an oil expert, warned of what is now being reported by scientists, which is news just breaking.

Pres. Obama should take BP off point, then put the military in charge, as well as move in small tankers, as Simmons and the other expert in the clip below suggest. Obama is making a fatal error if he keeps BP on point. If the new “massive” plume is what Simmons and other experts are now saying it is, there is a wider issue that BP isn’t even beginning to address about the blowout.

As for the wildlife catastrophe, it’s catastrophic, as is the damage to seafood and the very bounty that Americans harvest and enjoy from the Gulf.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Read full story · Comments { 8 }

Obama Finally Calls Press Conference After Charges of Failure to Lead Mount

BREAKING (10:29 am): First head rolls… Elizabeth Birnbaum fired as director of the U.S. Minerals Management Service, sources tell AP.

–Updated: “Top kill” reportedly working

He blew it. Obama faces a meltdown akin to the unraveling of his predecessor, George W. Bush. A press conference and a visit to the region are simply too little too late. It doesn’t matter whether government could do any better than the oil companies. The political fallout has taken hold. Obama failed to manage a massive crisis. There’s no fixing this failure. … – Craig Crawford


Full coverage at Huffington Post

According to a new USA Today/Gallup poll, 53% of Americans give Pres. Obama a failing grade on his handling of the BP blowout. It’s been earned.

So, on day 38, Pres. Obama is finally standing before the press to answer questions. This after an embarrassing Bushesque moment that found him at a San Francisco fundraiser for Sen. Boxer, while Gov. Bobby Jindal, James Carville, Donna Brazile and a chorus of others were screaming bloody murder for Obama to act.

What could he have done before today? This is what a president does who feels the nation’s pain, but also the screaming cries in the Gulf.

- Four weeks ago he should have done a closed-door meeting with the families of the 11 men who died, but also others on the BP rig, bringing experts with him so that he could hear and someone could record what is known about what happened before this accident occurred.

- Two weeks ago Pres. Obama should have taken BP off point, come before the people to announce it, putting the U.S. military in charge, with BP as back-up, also bringing in leading experts from every American oil company in the country.

- Two weeks ago Pres. Obama should have gone before the public to express what is now a scream from the people. That BP fouled our Gulf Coast, but also illustrating his own pain at what’s happening. It’s Pres. Obama who should have been the point man from the start, instead of sending bureaucrats out weeks later, people who either read from prepared speeches or droned on like robots, without adding anything but political gibberish to the horrific story.

- Instead of sending the esteemed Thad Allen out to delineate the civil and federal separation of duties, as has been done, Pres. Obama should have told BP from the start that they and their affiliated companies would not have primary decision making, evidence taking, or fact gathering. Then he should have made sure that independent people and entities were on point with the U.S. military.

The list goes on from there.

What can he do today?

- First, Pres. Obama should appeal to the Senate to immediately lift the liability caps on damages, naming names of senators who stand in the way of this important move.

- Pres. Obama should bring down the permits Gov. Bobby Jinal requested and personally put them in his hands. Then he should ask Mr. Jindal what else is needed. Obama should then get on the phone and demand everything that Mr. Jindal needs is given to him, without hesitation. A joint press conference should then be done, with Obama asking Jindal if there is anything else he needs. If Jindal says no, then Obama should say the governor has the number of the White House task force and he is to call if anything else is required.

- Most importantly, he should announce that he’s asking Congress to outlaw ultra-deep drilling off the coast of America’s shores. The 6-month moratorium on offshore drilling is now in place way too late. However, that’s not near enough. Ultra-deep drilling like what BP attempted should be outlawed.

- Pres. Obama can announce a townhall in Louisiana, then invite every fisherman, business owner and anyone else to it.

- Obama should also say that now that the federal gov. and the U.S. military is on point, there will be complete transparency on the science, the wildlife and natural habitat stats, as well as what happened and how it happened.

- Obama then should announce a team of scientists who will transparently asses the damage to the Barataria Estuary, as well as the wetlands, but also areas where oysters and shrimp live, to assess the damage of the dispersent chemicals on these areas, but also the dangers to people who eat the fish in the Gulf Coast zone impacted by BP’s corporate malfeasance.

- Pres. Obama should announce that not only will BP pay financial damages, but when the time comes BP executives could be liable for much more, hinting that criminal charges could be coming, though it’s obviously not the time to announce them now. But he should make the threat clear.

Oh, and one more thing. If Pres. Obama can announce that BP’s “top kill” is working so far, which reports breaking are now saying is true, it would help immensely. However, there will still be questions about why it took so long to get the material in place for the “top kill” and why the federal government didn’t insist that there be a worst case scenario plan in place in case what we’ve seen happened occurred. A “solution” on day 38 after the Barataria Estuary has been destroyed, chemicals polluting seafood and ruining businesses, plus people now getting sick, simply isn’t all that impressive. We can talk about how it could be worse if the “top kill” doesn’t work or hold, but that hardly makes up for BP and the feds not being prepared to protect the Gulf and the way of life of the Americans hurt by BP’s criminal negligence and the federal government’s obvious paralysis in a crisis.

There are more things that need to be done, especially since Pres. Obama has up to this day, handled the BP blowout like it was one in ten events on any given day, instead of the most important national emergency on his plate. He can never undo his hands off lack of leadership, the mistake to leave BP on point for 37 days, or his coldness to the impact of this tragedy and his lack of empathy, let alone the San Francisco photo op that lingers in many minds.

It’s clear that Pres. Obama doesn’t do empathy willingly. If it is revealed later today at his press conference, which will be held at 12:45 pm, it’s only because he was pushed, because somebody in his political office informed him that his presidency is on the line.

Obama-oil soaked dead water fowl photo compilation by the New York Times, using photos from Pablo Martinez Monsivais/Associated Press, Cheryl Gerber.

Read full story · Comments { 39 }

Joe Sestak Didn’t Offer Himself the Job

In the heat of a rough primary campaign Joe Sestak said he was offered a job by the White House. Contrary to Joe Scarborough’s statements, Sestak never said specifically what job. But his primary political gamesmanship is now coming back to haunt him. No doubt Ed Rendell is enjoying this after his machine was humiliated by Sestak’s win. Republicans smell an opening and are amassing:

In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder today, all seven Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee “urge the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate Congressman Joe Sestak’s claim that a White House official offered him a job to induce him to exit the Pennsylvania Senate primary race against Senator Arlen Specter.”

The seven – Sens. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, Orrin Hatch of Utah, Chuck Grassley of Iowa, Jon Kyl or Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, John Cornyn of Texas and Tom Coburn of Oklahoma – allege that the offer would appear to violate federal criminal laws, including 18 U.S.C. 600, which prohibits promising a government position “as consideration, favor, or reward for any political activity” or “in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any political office.”

But Greg Sargent has this exactly backwards.

It’s long past time for the White House to say what happened on their end, if only for the sake of the Senate race. If for no other reason than this sort of thing goes on all the time. The White House’s silence is what’s made this worse, even if you think Sestak is being hoisted on his own primary petard. It’s an important Senate seat and Pennsylvania matters to Obama looking forward.

After his win, Joe Sestak is now dependent on The Boss and his machine, both of which has a history of taking care of themselves, not others.

Not that this will hold off Republicans, who are moving forward as only Republicans can do.

For those of you political novices, this is a perfect example of Republican hardball 101. It’s something that Democrats never play and from which lessons are never taken.

Someone in the White House has to take the fall on this or Pat Toomey is going to benefit. Who will it be? …or will Obama hang Sestak out like he hung out Arlen Specter?

Read full story · Comments { 15 }

Tweet of the Day: Courting Bibi



The Obama administration, through Mr. Emanuel, is now working overtime to court Prime Minister Netanyahu. Via Haaretz:

White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel on Wednesday invited Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Washington for talks with the U.S. President Obama on regional peace and security.

“On behalf of the President I am happy to extend an invitation to visit President Obama in the White House for a working meeting to discuss our shared security interests, as well as our close co-operation in achieving peace between Israel and its neighbors,” Emanuel told Netanyahu at the prime minister’s Jerusalem office. [...]

Well, at least someone from Obama’s political office is paying attention. Just in case you thought 2012 was far from the White House mind.

Thanks to Jake Tapper for the hilarious tweet, which I re-tweeted, because the political scrambling sounds much better in song.

Read full story · Comments { 2 }

Making More Independents Every Day


via CBS

It hit on “Morning Joe” this a.m. that on day 36 of the BP blowout, Obama’s EPA chief Lisa Jackson decided it might not be a good idea to go to a New York fundraiser while the Gulf Coast is being coated in oil. It hadn’t occurred to her or the Administration before yesterday? The crisis of competence continues, with the White House political machine’s reputation in shambles.

Of course, on the other side sits the Republican Party, the single biggest benefactor to big oil in the history of political parties, not to mention the leader in deregulating and emasculating federal agencies so that the gigantic federal government has employees, but no teeth.

Neither of the Big Two are worthy of trust, because they’re both too busy delegating power to corporations and Wall Street in an alliance that is bringing this country to its knees.

Dylan Ratigan says it perfectly today:

This kind of bizarre ignorance of incentives is now displayed by our current president, who often appears to think that government works best when it is subservient to corporations under even the most dubious circumstances. So far, it seems like the only entrenched power that our president is interested in fighting was the Democratic Party machine that wanted him to wait his turn back in the primaries.

    This from a man that so many hoped would be an antidote to the horrendous corporatist reign of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney.

Nowhere is this attitude more on display than in the Gulf right now. Perhaps operating under the fear of that “if you try to actually fix something, you own it politically,” our government continues to abdicate its responsibilities in the ongoing disaster.

[...]Meanwhile, the corporation prevents tankers from cleaning up, scientists and engineers from researching, journalists from reporting and Americans from witnessing, all while the oil spill pumps into the gulf at an alarming rate for what could potentially be another 30 years before running dry.

I’m not sure what is more a sign of the times — having a Democratic White House claim that they couldn’t possible infringe on the rights of a private corporation that is destroying public water and land while a Republican Senator rightly demands a Government takeover, or Sarah Palin and Robert Gibbs having a flame war over who is more on the take from said corporation (the answer — both).

Besides James Carville today, my favorite quote comes from David Gergen. It goes like this: “If Gov. Fought WWII Like Oil Spill We’d Be Speaking German.”

However, the insult to injury was seeing Mr. Obama’s lackluster comment at Boxer’s fundraiser last night as he talked about nobody being angrier than he was over what was happening. No passion. No heart. Just words.

Neither of the Big Two political parties have shown any manner of competency in the last decade and counting of preventing or responding to the catastrophes that have hit our country. It’s why people are disgusted with both sides at a time when our great country continues to look paralyzed.

Read full story · Comments { 14 }

BP Did the Gulf Well on the Cheap and had Warnings BLOWOUT was Coming

Now The Daily Beast has obtained a document—displayed below—that goes to the heart of BP procedures, demonstrating that before the company’s previous major disaster—at a moment when the oil giant could choose between cost-savings and greater safety—it selected cost-savings. And BP chose to illustrate that choice, without irony, by invoking the classic Three Little Pigs fairy tale.The Daily Beast



“The political stupidity of this is unbelievable. … I have no idea of why they didn’t seize this thing. I have no idea of why their attitude was so handsoffy here. … The president of the United States could’ve come down here, he could’ve been involved with the families of these 11 people… He could’ve demanded a plan in anticipation of this. It just looks like he’s not involved in this. You got to get down here and take control of this, put somebody in charge of this thing and get this moving.”James Carville

A majority of people now disapprove of how Pres. Obama has handled BP’s blowout calamity. The bad reviews from Americans, regardless of political party, has been earned.

On the BBC’s program “World Have Your Say” yesterday, the two experts on the show, one from a spill company, the other from academia, seemed not only at a loss to take on BP, but seemed to have no idea of how some corporations work in cover up situations where the liability can be catastrophic. The spill expert saying that BP was one of the best, which experts I’ve talked to have rebutted, but also that they have a financial stake in solving the problem. What neither of these people get is that BP is in damage control to limit the damage people can see, which is why chemical dispersants were chosen by the ton, even though Louisiana officials begged the EPA not to allow the dumping, as Joe Scarborough reported today on “Morning Joe,” after seeing documents that prove it. The feds allowed the action by BP anyway, becoming complicit in destroying an ecosystem more than the oil itself. I also said that BP had done this well on the cheap, to which the spill company representative disagreed totally, saying by using Transocean that charge was simply untrue. Experts give a side of things that is important, but they are too naive by half when it comes to the politics of catastrophe, so are worthless in giving the public the reality of what’s playing out before our eyes.

Now we learn that BP ignored the warning signs that a blowout was coming. From the New York Times.

In the hours before the Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded last month in the Gulf of Mexico, there were strong warning signs that something was terribly wrong with the well, according to a Congressional committee that was briefed on the accident by executives from BP.

Among the red flags, the panel said, were several equipment readings suggesting that gas was bubbling into the well, a potential sign of an impending blowout. Investigators also noted “other events in the 24 hours before the explosion that require further inquiry,” including a critical decision to replace heavy mud in the pipe rising from the seabed with seawater, possibly increasing the risk of an explosion. [...]

When a company knows or gets warnings that puts people’s lives in danger, but they ignore those warnings and people die, the only question is whether it’s pre-meditated murder or simply manslaughter, though I imagine it’s the latter. We need to quit playing footsies with corporate criminals and instead hold them accountable by a standard that fits.

As for Pres. Obama, last night he was yucking it up at a fundraiser for Sen. Boxer. It was a deplorable spectacle as bad as anything George W. Bush did during Katrina.

I also find the reported “plug the damn leak” line from Obama, delivered with clenched jaw, unimpressive.

Another real issue is that over decades, going back to Ronald Reagan, we have deregulated and hobbled federal agencies, something on which the Democrats are complicit in order to gain corporate money and support, making the oil industry a self-regulating business.

Pres. Obama proved it by allowing BP to take point in a disaster they caused through what is looking like malicious intent and corporate indifference at the outcome of cutting costs and safety.

Part of what BP’s job is, besides stopping a leak on a well that should never have been drilled in the first place, is to keep as much visual damage from meeting the public’s eyes as possible. It’s one reason why disperants were used by the ton, to keep it under the ocean, even as the chemicals destroy an entire ecosystem that may never come back. It’s why in Mobile, AL it was reported that BP was using companies associated with them to count wildlife and birds killed from the oil coming on shore, so they could cover up how badly the natural habitat has been decimated by their callous corporate malfeasance.

Pres. Obama has not acquitted himself well so far during this national calamity. Dropping by the Gulf on Friday giving a speech isn’t likely to change the reality that he has remained paralyzed since it began. Every representative from the Obama administration who has been presented on camera has been an embarrassment. The fact that the federal gov. is a monstrosity with no power, having ceded it to the oil industry decades ago, doesn’t excuse having bumbling bureaucrats on camera play acting the role of outraged Obama minion in place of the Barack Obama doing it himself. The part where Mr. Obama is supposed to feel our pain, feel the dying life in the Gulf Coast region and transmit that outrage into immediate action, has been completely missing. The man can still make great speeches, but as a leader in crisis he has failed miserably.

“Eleven people are killed because of multinational corporate greed, malfeasance and possibly criminal negligence? I think Franklin Roosevelt would have jumped out of his wheelchair and run down here to be in the middle of this.”James Carville

Read full story · Comments { 23 }

‘Comprehensive Plan’ or Preemptive Election Year Strategy?

National Guard to the border:

“As part of his comprehensive plan to secure the Southwest border, President Obama will request $500 million in supplemental funds for enhanced border protection and law enforcement activities,” an administration official said Tuesday. “The president will also deploy up to an additional, requirements-based 1,200 National Guard troops to the border to provide intelligence; surveillance and reconnaissance support; intelligence analysis; immediate support to counternarcotics enforcement; and training capacity until Customs and Border Patrol can recruit and train additional officers and agents to serve on the border.”

The move is designed to quell an uproar over border security and immigration policy, but Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) is poised to ask for even more troops – he plans to request 6,000 Guardsmen for the border.

In light of the crisis in competence for Pres. Obama on BP’s Gulf blowout, coming after the heavy-handed Arizona immigration law, perhaps Obama’s political team decided they had to do something.

Read full story · Comments { 9 }

If Obama was a Republican He’d have Been Roasted by Now

BREAKING (2:50 PM)… Crisis of competence forces Pres. Obama to fly to Gulf Coast on Friday before Memorial Day vacation.



“I don’t know what was approved and not approved. I only know what I read in the papers.”Dr. Steven Chu

What does it tell you if BP hasn’t learned anything about cleaning up oil spills since 1989? It’s what oil experts have been saying to me about BP from the start. Not to mention that as Matthew Simmons said yesterday on Dylan Ratigan, no one should be doing this “ultra-deep drilling” in the first place.

I was on BBC’s “World Have Your Say” talking about this issue today. Right now BP engineers are preparing the “top kill,” which if it doesn’t work will mean months of more oil into the Gulf. Here’s praying

It has opened a severe and perhaps long-lasting crisis of confidence in Pres. Obama’s leadership ability. In a crisis is where you find a man or woman’s mettle. The evidence surfacing against Obama’s competence is overwhelming at day 36 of the largest environmental disaster in U.S. history.

Barack Obama is going to travel to California for a fundraiser for Sen. Boxer this week. It conjures up Bush-McCain birthday cake images during the height of Katrina.

Democrats need to face it so that we can put politics aside and call incompetence and lack of leadership for what it is.

Donna Brazile, a Louisianan and a die hard Obama supporter, asked Howard Fineman: Where is the fierce urgency of now? As I wrote last week, it’s MIA.

James Carville said it bluntly this weekend. The Obama administration is “risking everything by this go-along with BP strategy they have. And it seems like lackadaisical on this. I think that the government thinks they’re partnering with BP. I think they actually believe that BP has some kind of a good motivation here. And that’s one of the sort whole flaws, is they’re naive.”

The disappointing reality is that Pres. Obama is simply in over his head. His response to the BP Gulf oil blowout as of day 36 is revealed through the fact that he still believes partnering with BP is the answer. There are innumerable oil companies who can aid in what’s going on, as this has never been done before, so BP doesn’t have any monopoly on how to shut this down.

The “lackadaisical” approach, to quote Mr. Carville, which I see as cold-blooded indifference, is at the root of Obama’s leadership problems. It begins with the lack of passion and purpose when it comes to the importance of our environmental world. It is seen in Obama’s empathy gap. It is juxtaposed against the greed of political parties, politicians and federal agencies, which even though charged with protecting our great country, it’s habitat and surrounding waters, puts profit and oil over everything else.

To remind everyone, I was on the very first call with Thad Allen, Denis McDonough and John Brennan. Allen saying on May 1st: 1) “stop this thing at the source; extensive pressure on BP; 2) attack oil on the sea; 3) protect resources; 4) recover and mitigate what happens in the area.” Number one is to stop the oil. On day 36 they still haven’t done it using BP as a partner.

From the Washington Post:

[...] Minerals Management Service officials, who can receive cash bonuses in the thousands of dollars based in large part on meeting federal deadlines for leasing offshore oil and gas exploration, frequently changed documents and bypassed legal requirements aimed at protecting the marine environment, the documents show.

This has dramatically weakened the scientific checks on offshore drilling that were established under landmark laws such as the Marine Mammal Protection Act and the National Environmental Policy Act, say those who have worked with the MMS, which is part of the Interior Department.

Under the Bush and Obama administrations, red flags raised by scientists at NOAA and the Marine Mammal Commission have gone unheeded. Obama officials say they are taking steps to ensure that science guides drilling decisions; former agency officials say such questions are rarely as simple as they seem.

[...] But the pattern of dismissing biologists’ input has continued under the Obama administration. NOAA must judge whether companies have established adequate programs to monitor and minimize their impact on marine mammals before issuing a permit to operate offshore.

Partnering with the culprits who went on a never before attempted deep-well drilling expedition, without preparing for any sort of worst case scenario, seems simply like a way for Pres. Obama to hide behind the people he wants to blame so he won’t get hit.

Eliot Spitzer: “I don’t care who is responsible. How do you shut it down?” Adding: “Don’t hide behind who the responsible party is.”

There is a lot of partisan hackery going on with people defending the indefensible where the Obama administration’s complete un-impassioned actions regarding BP’s catastrophic blowout. Axelrod going on “Hardball” to bemoan BP’s suffering bottom line is just one example. Dr. Chu a learned academic, but no one in the Obama administration has yet to show empathy. You know, that people thing. There wasn’t an ounce of it between the Obama representatives in the Gulf yesterday, from Ken Salazar and to Janet Napolitano to Mary Landrieu to Dick Durbin.

Only Gov. Bobby Jindal showed the appropriate outrage.

This nation is losing the Barataria Estuaries, the entire Gulf Coast, and just maybe the oil in the Gulf of Mexico. This is a national security, environmental and economic emergency.

“… The thing you need to be terrified about is there might be no way to put this out other than waiting for the giant oil (inaudible) to deplete, which would be 9,000 days. So what they’re already worried about is that it’s going to take (the oil) out of the Gulf of Mexico.” – Matthew Simons, Simmons & Co. International (energy advisor George W. Bush administration), on Dylan Ratigan

Simmons also mentioned the provocative notion of having the Navy drop a bomb down the well and to cave it in. Perhaps this is over the top, but it certainly illustrates the alarm this oil expert perceives to be in play right now.

Move in. Take Over. BP can cry about it later.


This post has been updated.

Read full story · Comments { 32 }