TM NOTE: This is a re-posting of Wonk’s post from 8.28, as promised. Enjoy the read and her view of the current voting dilemma she’s experiencing.
~~~~~~~
While the national debate over the Mythical Threat of the (not-just-a) Mosque (not) at Ground Zero continues, I’d like to distract your attention to that other national distraction… who else but Sarah Palin?
Actually, what I am going to say here is ultimately not about her, either. It’s about all of us as Americans. But, sadly I stand a better chance of getting your attention this way.
Why? Because it’s become a national pastime to hyperventilate over Sarah Palin.
Either by obsessing over her as if she were the One True Evil to bash all the livelong day to Obama’s re-election in 2012.
Or, by propping her up as the Pioneer Woman Fix to American politics today, by virtue of a good ol’ fashioned slap in the face to the Good Ol’ Club.
Neither of these narrow views of Palin get at the truth as far as I’m concerned.
Sarah Palin is a female pol building a rightwinger populist brand. She is actively courting the grassroots on the hard right. As is her right. She’s her own woman and she’s chosen to argue for a rightwing worldview.
From my leftwing feminist worldview, Sarah Palin is not the problem with American politics today nor is she the solution to it.
For her conservative grassroots, she may very well be their idea of a solution. That’s nice for them.
It’s better than I can say for the grassroots on the left right now anyways, which is all the more sad because not only did we have our own Rosie-the-riveter telling us We Can Do It, not only was she 16-years battle-tested against the vast right wing and the tabloid stream press, not only was she a policy wonk who could get things done, but she understood the crux of the problem with American politics today was the “trust bust” (a theme that goes back to her Hillary Rodham days at Wellesley).
From the Dream Ticket Debate in Los Angeles, California, January 2008:
Hillary: Well, I would, with all due respect, say that the United States government is much more than a business. It is a trust. It is the most complicated organization. But it is not out to make a profit. It is out to help the American people. It is about to stand up for our values and to do what we should at home and around the world to keep faith with who we are as a country. And with all due respect, we have a president who basically ran as the CEO, MBA president, and look what we got. I am not too happy about the results.
Obama: Let me — let me just also point out that, you know, Mitt Romney hasn’t gotten a very good return on his investment during this presidential campaign And so, I’m happy to take a look at my management style during the course of this last year and his. I think they compare fairly well.
The prose of governing versus the poetry of campaigning. Hillary understood.
She was no hopey dopey Change to Pretty Please Believe In.
Nor was she any flimsy whimsy Mama Grizzly.
She was a Master Tigress. (And, still is!)
Point being, it’s not like the grassroots on the left didn’t have the chance to thwart the Mama Grizzly phenomenon before it ever got started. We were right there on the verge. 18 million of us were ready. It could have been the Decade of Master Tigresses. However…
As Corzine put it recently, “she would have been able to handle this Congress… but it was just Obama’s time.””
Snort! If you *still* rationalize voting for Obama over Hillary because it was “just Obama’s time,” then please withhold any “concern” you may have about the rise of Mama Grizzlies. Male empty suits aren’t the only ones who “just have their time,” you know.
What Palin does with the power base she’s building, time will only tell. Everybody seems to have all kinds of theories about her political maneuvering and her political chances and what a President Palin’s governing style would be like in comparison to her rhetoric. But, I really don’t have much of a sense of any of that other than a general feeling of “neither here, nor there.” Citizen Sarah seems to be enjoying the ride and living in the moment and already has 12 million reasons and counting to laugh all the way to the bank.
As for Palin’s chances at the presidency were she to ever run, all I can say is that after experiencing the open season on women pols and their supporters in 2008, I really see the nomination process itself as a huge hurdle, forget about the general election. One of the two major wings (D or R) of the United Corporations of America will have to make a woman their nominee before I’ll believe either the Ds or Rs are capable of it. So far they’ve only proven how capable they are of using women as scapegoats to prop up men with very little leadership and conviction of their own to stand on.
As such, I firmly believe the bimbostein bogeywoman of Sarah Palin is one that exists in the cynical hearts and fevered imaginations of a bankrupt Democratic party that increasingly has had nothing to run on, so it desperately needs someone to keep on running against all the way to 2012. Some party of women that is.
Mother Jones, who in a very different time did not have the right to vote and did not support women’s suffrage once said:
“I have never had a vote, and I have raised hell all over this country! You don’t need a vote to raise hell! You need convictions and a voice!”
If you want to combat the rightwing memes and policies spread by Mama Grizzlies (as I do), the only effective way (to my mind) is to build up the hellraisers who can provide a real meaningful alternative to those rightwing memes/policies. Tearing down Palin’s womanhood will not stop the rightwing agenda. Caricaturing her as a backwoods biddy will not stop the attack on women’s rights.
Because here is the real problem (this is a screenshot, you can click on this link to the chart to see it in its entirety, or click on the image below for a larger view):
Note: This is not an endorsement of the Green party. I have not made up my mind yet but am looking at all my third party options.
I just think the chart is hilarious all around, but most especially where it says “Right to Choose.”
See that Question mark next to Democratic support?
It’s the same thing that I call the Asterisk Next to Women’s Rights.
This is the real attack on our right to choose. The party that claims to be protectors of that right has put a huge asterisk next to it.
The difference between the Party of Mama Grizzly and the Party of Papa Stupak is no difference at all. There is no party of women’s rights, just a system meant to restrict those rights thus keeping them in perpetual limbo. The Mama Grizzly party’s stated aims are actually more or less consistent with that agenda, so at least they are more honest about what they are up to. The Democrats pretend to protect women’s rights only to sell them out.
This is not acceptable. Listen to Eleanor’s Advice! Don’t Mess with Women’s Rights:
“The battle for the individual rights of women is one of long standing and none of us should countenance anything which undermines it.” –First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt
The damage done with Stupakistan is two-fold:
On the practical level of the equity argument, poor women should have the same freedom, access, and ability to exercise their choice on abortion as wealthy women do. The reverse should not essentially be codified into law.
And, on a fundamental level of political freedom, it keeps women still vulnerable in the back alley of politics, with the figurative choice between a coathanger (Democrats) or barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen (Republicans). When American women are unable to exercise their full political voices and devote them completely to fighting for or against the meat of public policy–because they’re stuck fighting for their BASIC human rights–this does not just hurt women, it hurts all Americans.
This is what happened on healthcare. Our energies were diverted by the Stupakistan gambit when we could have used that energy to fight for a Medicare expansion rather than Obama’s mandated junk insurance.
And, it doesn’t just stop there. The Stupaksis disease is spreading across the country. This is a spreadsheet called State Legislation Enacted in 2010 Related to Reproductive Health. I’d put the entire spreadsheet here if it wasn’t so big. You really need to see this chart if you haven’t already. It is creepy. I was horrified the first time I saw it and that horror is etched into my brain. Ordinary Americans are alive and suffering in this economy and state governments are going nuts passing gibberish amendments such as Requires Provider to Inform a Woman That Abortion Ends “the Life of a Separate, Unique, Living Human Being” and “Considers Some Miscarriages Murder.”
What fresh hell is this? All under a Democratic president, a Democratic Congress, and a Democratic female Speaker of the House. Do you feel very safe and protected reading that spreadsheet? I don’t.
When the chosen method of protection doesn’t work, a different method of protection is needed. (Pun accidental.)
We recently celebrated the 90th birthday of our 19th Amendment. It’s rather surreal that less than a century ago, a woman’s right to vote was also an asterisk that had to be resolved. Of course a lot has improved for women in that time. But, in other ways, the more things have changed, the more they have stayed the same.
I ask you to remember the suffragists themselves and how they got us the vote. They didn’t get us the vote by falling for the strawman that they had to support Democrats or else the Republicans would win.
The truth is: the Democratic party needs our rights in limbo because it keeps us hostage to the Politics of No Place Else to Go. If they can convince most of us that we still need them to protect our reproductive rights from the GOP, whose assault on our rights is 2% more evil than the Dems’ assault on our rights, then they sure as hell don’t have to do anything to earn our votes.
I don’t think it makes a difference if the current lot of Ds is in charge or the GOP is… it’s an illusion… because really it’s one party all in power…a giant party elite orgy that both sides are equal participants in… they just rotate who gets to drink more from the corporate cash trough every 4-8 years.
One of the crucial mechanisms that they use to keep this system rigged is by keeping fundamental human rights hanging in the balance. The other is the politics of divide and conquer. Women, LGBT, workers, immigrants, religious, racial, and ethnic minorities, older voters, younger voters, and so on and so forth… ordinary Americans under the bus, no place else to go, pit against each other and stuck fighting for our most basic rights and any semblance of a safety net while we are stuck in endless unnecessary war, our Constitution under attack, our economy and standard of living unraveling at the seams. Meanwhile our politicians allow the country to be swept up in “controversies” that are not the problem, the solution, or the point? That is the real threat playing into the hands of extremists of all sorts who wish to see our way of life deteriorate.
As Maggie Williams said during the Hillary campaign in 2008:
We will not be distracted.
November is getting closer. Many of us are not exactly feeling our most confident about how to make our voices heard and our votes meaningful when the choice is between worthless Democrats who run as “Independent conservatives” and Republicans who run as batshit insane.
I’ll leave you again with what Mother Jones said:
“I have never had a vote, and I have raised hell all over this country! You don’t need a vote to raise hell! You need convictions and a voice!”












Great post. That chart really puts it all in perspective, doesn’t it? As I look down that list I realize that I am almost 100% in line with the Green Party as opposed to the Democrats, despite being a life long Democrat.
I know I’ve said this a hundred times here but I’m going to say it again. Only with a totally uninformed, uninterested electorate could Palin rise to power the way she has. I still am stunned that she was seen as a credible VP candidate given she really knew nothing much about anything, except the all important ability to deliver a sharp, witty, sarcastic soundbite. Facts didn’t matter. Truth didn’t matter. Knowledge didn’t matter. Of course, similar things could be said about George Bush II.
That of course doesn’t mean that Palin isn’t powerful or that she isn’t a political force in her own right- she clearly is because we’ve made her one and that says more about us than it does about her.
Back to the dems- I don’t think I’ve ever been so angry as when I watched Robert Gibbs with his smarmy, arrogant smile announcing that we, the Base, would vote for Obama even after his condescending hit-job about the Professional Left, because essentially his Boss is better than the other team. I wanted to throw a large, heavy object at the TV screen. That made me want to NOT vote for Obama in 2012 irrespective of what GOP loser is running for POTUS. And as a member of the gay community, I am not amused with Obama (or the dems) continued willingness to throw us under any big bus that happens to be coming down the pike. Obama has no intention of lifting a finger to get rid of DADT and he doesn’t support gay marriage. #mfail!
Hashtag fits, SCB.
Ditto on Gibbs.
Continue to raise hell, Taylor. You have the convictions and the voice, and I hear you.
It’s simply amazing that Secretary Clinton is deemed qualified to serve in any governmental capacity (which I strongly agree with) by “experts” of all stripes but their major endeavor is to keep her away from the presidency.
The rabid anti-Hillary f**ks, as well as their tepid colleagues, insist she and BO have like policies and she would not do things differently. I do not believe that for an instant and know she would be doing our country and its citizens proud if the corporate world and its Dimocrat politicians had not cheated her out of the presidency.
Darn.
Thanks for chiming in, Sally.
The My $0.02 post was actually by me (Wonk the Vote). This is my Saturday guest column which Taylor has kindly invited me to say my piece.
Well, thank you, Wonk the Vote, for the great post. I can see that you spent a lot of time thinking and writing about this.
I do read your posts here and enjoy them but missed that you were the author of this one. Please accept by apology.
Good for you, Wonk.
I so applaud you raising this discussion here in such a serious, well reasoned post. I’m so pleased you’re writing here.
Because of the timing of my Beck rally post and because I didn’t know you were going to post late, I intend to re-post this entry from you again at another time to make sure more people read it.
I sincerely hope you continue to share your ruminations on voting. It’s fascinating, though I know it’s ultimately private, but I do appreciate reading it.
Always glad to see you commenting, Sally.
Taylor, I read the blog daily even though I don’t often comment.
It seems you are doing very well in D.C. Congratulations.
It’s been a tremendous move on all counts, Sally.
…and thanks for reading “daily!”
Wonk – you said it all. FABULOUS writing and analysis. I’m well on my way to voting Green. I’m sick of the Dems and their playing the game of “well the base will come back because the Repubs have nothing to offer.” Well neither do the Dems. After the health care fiasco, women’s reproductive rights, DADT and throwing every Dem supporter under the bus regardless of their support for the party I’m finished with the Democratic Party. And as to Obama – he had one of the biggest opportunities to become a great POTUS, not just to make history as the first AA President. I’m totally disenchanted and disheartened. I can’t believe that the Democratic Party has become Republican lite. They deserve what is coming down the pike and if Sarah Palin becomes the next POTUS, the Dems will have put her into power because they were too blinded by their greed and need to cow tow to the corporations.
Hope you are well, JA.
Same here…love to hear from you Jane.
Ditto.
I voted Green in the only race where I had that option in my district, in Texas, in 2008 — at the top. I continue looking for options to the two Corporate Parties, including, if need be, “none of the above.”
I’m liberal, feminist, member of Queerdom, and waaay over supporting “you have nowhere else to go” assumptions.
Wonk, you wrote: “I ask you to remember the suffragists themselves and how they got us the vote. They didn’t get us the vote by falling for the strawman that they had to support Democrats or else the Republicans would win.”
IF this lesson is learned by enough people who cast votes, who volunteer for and contribute to candidates, etc., then the kind of changes earned and won by the suffragists are possible. Otherwise, we’ll keep fighting the strawmen from our crowded postion under the bus.
Joyce~ I am following that path but it takes surprising discipline.I am so used to being a worker bee and we have a god awful challenger to the Dem running for Senator in MO. Roy Blunt! Tom Delay’s bagman.
The Dem Robin Carnahan has been a good AG for the last several years and she comes from a much admired political family in MO.Her father won his senate race after he had been killed in a plane wreak! I still have my campaign buttons.Her mother took the seat but lost re-election.Got those buttons too.Her brother is my representitive.
I was about to go to work for her and she came out FOR extending the tax cuts for the wealthy. If she is that willing to compromise now how will she act under the influence? (of Washington)
I have to admit six years of a sleazebag send shivers down my spine but how in the hell could I defend extending tax cuts to the rich on phone calls? No way!
I have the “I’m still with Mel” buttons too. (I was holed up in Missouri in 2000.)
That was a bummer to hear about Robin coming out for extending the Bush tax cuts.
Wonk, I greatly appreciate your writing, always.
I too find rather tiresome the “hyper-ventilating” about Sarah Palin that seems to engage the attentions of some people.
As Lake Lady commented once, she finds it “boring.” Me too.
As you say, we were “right there on the verge” with the strong, principled Hillary R. Clinton. But now….
Now we have to listen to all this tripe about Palin.
Bravo Wonk! Fabulous post! You have been a very busy lady today.
I’m making a copy of this one and keeping it where I can read it often.
Thank you!
Great Post Wonk !! and your post was right on target !! The two party system in this country is not working !! It seems we have two parties that go to the right !! In Europe,Canada, and other countries, their conserative parties are no where near as right-wing as the one in this country and the democratic party in this country would be considered right-wing compared to other demoratic to liberal parties in Europe, Canada, Australia and other countries. That chart you showed Wonk, is scary with in itself because it shows how both parties are the same.
It would be an interesting campaign with Sarah hiding behind Twitter, Facebook and Fox News. I can’t help but think that if she really threw her hat into the ring in say, 6 months, she’d be subject to ACTUAL scrutiny with respect to her knowledge of issues, etc. The fact is, things are better for her with all this speculation- she can feed off of it, keep people guessing and roll in all the dough she’s made.
Right now, the beauty of being Sarah, is she never has to be right about anything. She can Tweet about death panels, suggest bombing Iran and make stupid comments about Park 51 without any real accountability because she’s more of a movement than a viable Presidential candidate at this point. One of the big barriers to her running is that behind the scenes, apparently many in the GOP don’t want her to run- at least that’s what some have said.
I am sure all those boring white guys see her as a threat in more ways than one. Ha!