TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Reagan and Casey Would Approve



Bob Woodward has a new book coming out on “Obama’s Wars.” Peter Baker does a synopsis, with this little beauty reminding me of what the CIA’s William Casey did way back when:

Beyond the internal battles, the book offers fresh disclosures on the nation’s continuing battle with terrorists. It reports that the C.I.A. has a 3,000-man “covert army” in Afghanistan called the Counterterrorism Pursuit Teams, or C.T.P.T., mostly Afghans who capture and kill Taliban fighters and seek support in tribal areas. Past news accounts have reported that the C.I.A. has a number of militias, including one trained on one of its compounds, but not the size of the covert army.

Once Gen. McChrystal imploded inside Rolling Stone magazine it was clear COIN, as well as what Obama wanted to do, didn’t have a prayer. ABC’s Martha Raddatz confirmed the completely unwinding inside Afghanistan on Bill Maher’s show last Friday, when she said that the Taliban is gaining strength every day, and although there is a lot of great work being done around Afghanistan there is no connectivity. Raddatz didn’t see how it all could possibly come together.

Back in the 1980s, William Casey ran his own secret war against the Soviets. Today’s CIA’s duty inside that country isn’t secret from Obama, but it is reminiscent. It’s a reminder that you can’t win a conventional war in Afghanistan. Cloak and daggers is the only path, which will make a lot of Pres. Obama’s fans squeamish, because they don’t want to be in Afghanistan in the first place.

Richard Holbrooke is quoted as saying Obama’s COIN strategy for Afghanistan cannot work. That’s been proven correct. McChrystal telegraphed that months ago. So, at this point I think it’s pretty safe to say that whatever was hoped for inside Afghanistan when Obama called it the necessary war isn’t happening and isn’t going to.

So, the question now is why is Pres. Obama intent on staying until summer 2011 when the covert CIA mission is likely the only headway we’ll make? We don’t need 100,000 troops inside Afghanistan, most of whom are simply target practice for the Taliban at this point, with U.S. casualties mounting.

Oh, and if anyone is keeping score, Joe Biden was right, which means Gates and Clinton were wrong, going way out on a limb on the current Afghanistan strategy that isn’t even working under Gen. Petraeus. That goes double when you consider what Baker reports from the Woodward book. That the Pentagon asked for 4,500 “enablers,” with Pres. Obama replying “I’m done doing this!”

No other journalist has gotten the access to 1600 Pennsylvania’s residents that Bob Woodward has enjoyed. His access got him into a bit of a snag back during the Valerie Plame affair, when Woodward was revealed to know a lot more than he had revealed in public.

Screen capture from Politico.

About Taylor Marsh

Veteran political analyst and author of "The Hillary Effect - Politics, Sexism and the Destiny of Loss," now available in print at Amazon.com, and 1 of 4 books chosen by Barnes and Noble to launch their "NOOK First" Featured Authors Selection program. Former Miss Missouri, Broadway dancer, & relationship consultant at LA Weekly, produced & wrote one woman show "Weeping for JFK."

, , , , , , , , ,

6 Responses to Reagan and Casey Would Approve

  1. BC30 22 September 2010 at 10:18 am #

    Taylor, I reread this article online after I read it in print this morning. The online version strikes these paragraphs right before talking about Karzai’s depression:

    “Mr. Woodward reveals the code name for the CIA’s drone missile campaign in Pakistan, Sylvan Magnolia, and writes the whitehouse was so enamored of the program that Mr. Emanuel would regularly call the CIA director, Leon E. Panetta, asking, “Who did we get today?”

    The book describes a series of National Security Agency eavesdropping programs used in war zones and beyond, with names like Sharkfinn and Jester, and an NSA capability to break into foreign computers.”

    “But another converstaion in the book underscores the tension to come as that deadline nears. ‘All we have to do is behin to show progress and that’ll be sufficient to add time to the clock and we’ll get what we need,” Patreaus told General Lute, the White House adviser.

    General Lute corrected him. ‘That’s a dramatic misreading of this president,’ he said.”

    • Lake Lady 22 September 2010 at 10:31 am #

      BC30 thats for the additional graphs.

  2. Lake Lady 22 September 2010 at 10:27 am #

    Chuck Todd thought it was interesting that Peter Baker having the whole book did not feature any tidbits on SOS Clinton.Saying somthing like…”you know if there was anything interesting he would mention it.” and “hummm very interesting…”for whatever what he thinks is worth.

  3. Dredd 22 September 2010 at 11:10 am #

    A battle in the war with Iran may have already happened.

    There is growing talk of software that brought down an Iranian Nuclear Power Plant.

    If it is U.S. software add that to the Obama wars.

  4. masslib 22 September 2010 at 3:10 pm #

    Joe Biden wasn’t right. Hr isn’t the anti-Afghan war guy. he’s the lets fight it with unmanned drones and continue our move into Pakistan guy. They were/are all wrong. The only one who was right, was John Kerry who said in 2005 this is a policing mission not a military mission. Joe Biden is an idiot.

    • Taylor Marsh 22 September 2010 at 5:23 pm #

      heh-heh… There isn’t a single upper level Democrat who’s been consistently anti Afghanistan war. Kerry was a prescient Tora Bora man, back when I had a lot of interaction with him and his people. He moved slowly on it, but he did come to a place where Obama absolutely wasn’t.

      As for Biden, he wanted counterterrorism, which is winning out. As for predator drones, Biden has a lot of company, including Mr. Obama. Biden was also the most prescient on Pakistan, long before it was cool. He guest posted on this site on Pakistan, which was a fantastic piece on the region.