TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Archive | May, 2011

David Gregory Goes Beyond Russert’s ‘Gotcha’ Style to Get Gingrich

Earlier Tuesday, Gingrich — who’d made 34 previous appearances on “Meet the Press” – said on a conference call that he “didn’t go in [to the interview] quite hostile enough, because it didn’t occur to me going in that you’d have a series of setups.”NBC’s David Gregory Defends Medicare Question As Newt Gingrich Spokesman Blasts Media ‘Minions’

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Newt’s pulling a Palin, blaming David Gregory for having told the truth on “Meet the Press.” Mr. Gingrich had been on MTP 34 times, so this won’t fly. What the “set up” issue is about is Tim Russert, because that was his interview style.

The video above is of Gregory on “Morning Joe” today pushing back and for good reason.

Gingrich buzz-sawed himself through talking points he thought would play well with a larger audience. Unfortunately, Republicans disabused him quickly that he’s going to waltz right into the nomination. What sounds good to the wider electorate and viewer, which made Gingrich 2.0 sound sane, won’t cut it for Republican primary voters, which Gingrich found out in swift order.

From the transcript where Newt got caught up on his own words:

MR. GREGORY: What about entitlements? The Medicare trust fund, in stories that have come out over the weekend, is now going to be depleted by 2024, five years earlier than predicted. Do you think that Republicans ought to buck the public opposition and really move forward to completely change Medicare, turn it into a voucher program where you give seniors…

REP. GINGRICH: Right.

MR. GREGORY: …some premium support and–so that they can go out and buy private insurance?

REP. GINGRICH: I don’t think right-wing social engineering is any more desirable than left-wing social engineering. I don’t think imposing radical change from the right or the left is a very good way for a free society to operate. I think we need a national conversation to get to a better Medicare system with more choices for seniors. But there are specific things you can do. At the Center for Health Transformation, which I helped found, we published a book called “Stop Paying the Crooks.” We thought that was a clear enough, simple enough idea, even for Washington. We–between Medicare and Medicaid, we pay between $70 billion and $120 billion a year to crooks. And IBM has agreed to help solve it, American Express has agreed to help solve it, Visa’s agreed to help solve it. You can’t get anybody in this town to look at it. That’s, that’s almost $1 trillion over a decade. So there are things you can do to improve Medicare.

MR. GREGORY: But not what Paul Ryan is suggesting, which is completely changing Medicare.

REP. GINGRICH: I, I think that, I think, I think that that is too big a jump. I think what you want to have is a system where people voluntarily migrate to better outcomes, better solutions, better options, not one where you suddenly impose upon the–I don’t want to–I’m against Obamacare, which is imposing radical change, and I would be against a conservative imposing radical change.

There is nothing sneaky or underhanded in what Gregory asked, but he got the story by simply engaging Gingrich and letting him talk.

NBC News had a long run with the late Tim Russert, but his gotcha style, combative interviews where he always waited to spring a ridiculous question like “what’s your favorite Bible verse,” served no one. That Russert rarely included women in his line-up was a continual beef with me, which I wrote about for years. When you’re talking about the world women matter, but Russert froze out women as headliners, while also preferring Republicans.

If we got into the “If it’s Sunday it’s Misogyny” angle, all Sunday shows would lose and so do women, though at least today we have women anchoring them, Candy Crowley on CNN and Christiane Amanpour on ABC.

David Gregory exposed Newt Gingrich through fair, open debate. Katie Couric did the same thing when she interviewed Sarah Palin, as did Rachel Maddow when she interview Rand Paul and he ended up tying himself in knots over the Civil Rights Act.

No “set up” was used to coerce Mr. Gingrich, just straight out conversation that unfolded into a political death trap that Rockefeller Newt is still trying to explain his way out of but simply can’t.

This column has been updated.

Read full story · Comments { 5 }

From Cambridge and Princeton, Cornell West

West begins with a bit of historical revision. West suggests that the President discarded him without provocation after he offered the Obama for America campaign his loyal service and prayers. But anyone with a casual knowledge of this rift knows it began during the Democratic primary not after the election. It began, not with a puffed up President, but when Cornel West’s “dear brother” Tavis Smiley threw a public tantrum because Senator Obama refused to attend Smiley’s annual State of Black America. – Cornel West v. Barack Obama, by Melissa Harris-Perry

Isn’t it time people quit whining about Obama’s alleged “deception”? The only people deceived by Candidate Obama were those who wanted to be part of the incredible wave of landing the first African American political phenom in the White House. It was a worthy goal.

There was plenty of information to know he’d govern just as he has, which is center-right. Republicans helped Obama move their way by continually calling him a “socialist,” giving him cover, which would be clever considering Obama’s rightward tilt if they did it on purpose, except Republicans actually believed the far left drivel. So people can be suckered, letting emotion rule their vote. I’ve been writing and talking about this for 15 years, battling “Obamabots” every day. What else is new?

Certainly nothing coming out of Cornel West.

He now nurses, like many others who placed their faith in Obama, the anguish of the deceived, manipulated and betrayed. – The Obama Deception: Why Cornel West Went Ballistic

If Cornell West had compiled a list like this I’d be all ears, but he didn’t (h/t Peter Daou).

Deceived? Manipulated? Betrayed? Good God, no wonder our democratic republic is going through so much angst. We The People has turned into a cry for a king.

“I have to take some responsibility,” he admits of his support for Obama as we sit in his book-lined office. “I could have been reading into it more than was there.

Now that’s actually worth discussing: The responsibility of supporters of politicians, which should include losing the blind idolatry to a person, replacing it with allegiance to policies and Democratic ideology that makes government more effective.

Did Cornel West just discover that any national candidate, no matter the party, is beholden to Wall Street and the financial movers and shakers?

Obama stood in Iowa and lied to primary voters. (At the time, I wrote about it here and here.)

Did West miss it?

Obama told George Stephanopoulos that he’d never been a leftist, but could find a way to bring people together. Translation: he’s a mediator, a compromiser in chief.

Obama had virtually the same voting record on foreign policy, except that he ducked the tough vote on Iran when he was running for president to hide the evidence.

Candidate Obama raised more money from Big Banks and Wall Street than any other candidate, but all presidential candidates do this dance.

All Mr. West proved by unloading to Chris Hedges is that a “moral philosopher” can be as petty as anyone else, especially once we get to the foundation of the grievance, which is always the last to surface.

“There is the personal level,” he says. “I used to call my dear brother [Obama] every two weeks. I said a prayer on the phone for him, especially before a debate. And I never got a call back. And when I ran into him in the state Capitol in South Carolina when I was down there campaigning for him he was very kind. The first thing he told me was, ‘Brother West, I feel so bad. I haven’t called you back. You been calling me so much. You been giving me so much love, so much support and what have you.’ And I said, ‘I know you’re busy.’ But then a month and half later I would run into other people on the campaign and he’s calling them all the time. I said, wow, this is kind of strange. He doesn’t have time, even two seconds, to say thank you or I’m glad you’re pulling for me and praying for me, but he’s calling these other people. I said, this is very interesting. And then as it turns out with the inauguration I couldn’t get a ticket with my mother and my brother. I said this is very strange. We drive into the hotel and the guy who picks up my bags from the hotel has a ticket to the inauguration. My mom says, ‘That’s something that this dear brother can get a ticket and you can’t get one, honey, all the work you did for him from Iowa.’ Beginning in Iowa to Ohio. We had to watch the thing in the hotel. “What it said to me on a personal level,” he goes on, “was that brother Barack Obama had no sense of gratitude, no sense of loyalty, no sense of even courtesy, [no] sense of decency, just to say thank you. Is this the kind of manipulative, Machiavellian orientation we ought to get used to? That was on a personal level.”

Note to all: Don’t ever be seduced into believing there is ever a personal level of connection between you and a candidate. It’s pure fantasy located only in your mind.

Tavis Smiley got mad because Candidate Obama didn’t make his annual State of Black America back in early 2008. Smiley was justified. It was odd Obama ducked it, but considering he did a flyover of the first Democratic debate in Carson City, which I attended and reported on, it wasn’t surprising, at least not to me. But then nothing Obama has done has come as a surprise to me. If you’re not going to get the first viable African American candidate for president to give a crap about the state of “the Black Union” what’s the point?

Interestingly, women certainly didn’t feel this way about Hillary Rodham Clinton. So another part of this conversation that might be interesting is why Smiley and Cornell West feel it’s imperative for Barack Obama to kiss their rings, but women didn’t feel any compelling reason to support the first viable female candidate in U.S. history.

This puts Cornell West’s whining into perspective.

Dear supporters, politicians never pay you back for your loyalty. The extent to which they continue to give a damn about what you want, think or feel is directly related to your ability to cause them political pain.

Cornell West, through Chris Hodges, is sending up a flare that he can cause Obama reelect damage. It’s pontificating puffery for the insider crowd, because no one in the country cares about this fraternal man fight.

Melissa Harris-Perry is having none of it:

I have many criticisms of the Obama administration. I wrote angrily about his choice of Rick Warren to deliver a prayer at the inauguration. I have spoken on television about my disagreement with drone attacks in Pakistan and been critical of the administration’s initial choice to prosecute DADT cases. I worked for more progressive health care reform legislation and supported organizations that resisted the reproductive rights “compromises” in the bill. I’ve been scathing in public remarks and writings about the President’s education policy. My husband leads a non-profit that is suing HUD for its implementation of a discriminatory formula in the post-Katrina Road Home program. The president has never called me. I got my ticket to the inauguration from Canada! (Because Canadian Broadcast Television who gave me a chance to narrate the day’s events.) But I can tell the difference between a substantive criticism and a personal attack. It is clear to me that West’s ego, not the health of American democracy, is the wounded creature in this story.

Few in new media started any earlier than I did researching and delving into Barack Obama’s record. Few have stayed on his case more closely, now going on four years. On foreign policy, Pres. Obama has been as scatalogical dart thrower, with no clear through line, which I’ve outlined step by agonizing step. His decision to go into Libya was a colossal blunder. I’m all ears for his speeches on the Middle East, then to AIPAC, but both seem like horrible missteps. However, I’m not going to get seduce into joining West’s ridiculous side show.

West even plays the Barack’s Not Black Enough card, which is so 2007.

“I think my dear brother Barack Obama has a certain fear of free black men,” West says. “It’s understandable. As a young brother who grows up in a white context, brilliant African father, he’s always had to fear being a white man with black skin. All he has known culturally is white. He is just as human as I am, but that is his cultural formation. When he meets an independent black brother, it is frightening. And that’s true for a white brother. When you get a white brother who meets a free, independent black man, they got to be mature to really embrace fully what the brother is saying to them. It’s a tension, given the history. It can be overcome. Obama, coming out of Kansas influence, white, loving grandparents, coming out of Hawaii and Indonesia, when he meets these independent black folk who have a history of slavery, Jim Crow, Jane Crow and so on, he is very apprehensive. He has a certain rootlessness, a deracination. It is understandable.

Can Dr. West be this clueless about American politics? Evidently, but that he’s so willing to unpack it for all to see is stunning.

If it turns out in the end that we have a crypto-fascist movement and the only thing standing between us and fascism is Barack Obama, then we have to put our foot on the brake. But we’ve got to think seriously of third-party candidates, third formations, third parties. [...]

Nice closer, but doesn’t comport with reality, as we have a two-party duopoly that isn’t going anywhere as long as people rail at politicians instead of working to abolish the Electoral College. This is what really unmasks West’s emotionally unhinged attack on Pres. Obama. If he could put his own self-aggrandizing grievances aside and get to a path that leads people to empowerment that would be one thing. But instead West is gnashing his teeth for attention.

Mission accomplished.

But you’d at least think a brother would give the boss some credit for the decision he made on the gutsy Seal Team 6 mission to kill Osama bin Laden. Tough crowd.

Read full story · Comments { 32 }

Newt: ‘Any ad which quotes what I said on Sunday is a falsehood’

There isn’t enough popcorn in the world to slake the savage salaciousness of watching Newt Gingrich’s contagion implosion. Okay, so that’s a bit much. But giddy just doesn’t cut it.



“Any ad which quotes what I said on Sunday is a falsehood, because I have said publicly those words were inaccurate and unfortunate,” he told FOX’s Greta Van Susteren. “”When I make a mistake, and I’m going to on occasion, I’m going to share with the American people that was a mistake becuase that way we can have an honest conversation.” – Newt Apologizes To Paul Ryan, Begs Democrats Not To Use His Own Quotes In Ads

And in the conservative grown ups corner we have Jon Hunstman, who is headed to New Hampshire, with the assumption now that he’s going to get into the race, headquarters rumored to be Florida.

If Huntsman does announce his candidacy, as is widely expected, and does base his campaign in Orlando, it’s another sign of the large role Florida will play in the GOP primary process and the general election.

Florida’s is an important battleground state and the Republican party’s presidential nominating convention will be held in Tampa. The on-going controversy over when the state hold’s its presidential primary is another sign of Florida’s importance in campaign politics.

“Florida is by far and away the single most important state for the GOP and its presidential contenders, both in the primary and in the general election. If the eventual Republican nominee fails to win Florida, then President Obama is all but guaranteed reelection,” GOP strategist Ford O’Connell told CNN.

Read full story · Comments { 2 }

Get Ready for BACHMANN 2012

“Our Facebook has been lit up. Our donations are pouring in, and people are saying ‘Michele, jump in. We want you to run’. We had announced earlier that we would be looking at a June entry date for a decision, one way or another, about this race. Possibly, we may move that up.” – Bachmann might announce sooner than June (h/t Chris Cilizza)

There is an opening that’s made for Michele Bachmann and she knows it. So do her supporters, including those homeschoolers in her home state of Iowa.

Back in March, Bachmann said she’d make a decision in June. But that was before Mike Huckabee bowed out, leaving Iowa evangelical conservatives without a candidate.

During the budget battle, Michele Bachmann’s appearances on the “Today” show and “Daily Rundown” and beyond showed her answering questions like a grown up, while Sarah Palin was reduced to tweet bursts on the budget.

In fact, the last few months Rep. Michele Bachmann has shown a level of maturity we hadn’t seen before, first by navigating the budget fight without throwing Speaker Boehner under her campaign bus, saying this wasn’t the fight to push to the wall. She also took Obama “at his word” on where he was born, which considering the class of crazy around her actually makes her look.. um.. er.. softer right-wing, if you can swallow that oxymoron.

Bachmann’s politics are obviously not mine. So, trying to pick a word that sounds fair and balanced I’m left with extreme versus wacko. She’s definitely a dedicated conservative with the ability to actually translate her beliefs into a message that gets Tea Party activists excited.

If ever there was a year for a female conservative to throw caution to the wind and chase a presidential dream just like the men this is it.

Depending on what Republican rises, not so much Tim Pawlenty, but if it’s Mitt Romney, a Michele Bachmann vice presidential nomination wouldn’t be out of the question. She’d make one hell of a surrogate taking apart Barack Obama, while being seasoned enough to handle the role, unlike the first female the Republicans picked.

Or could she go from Iowa through South Carolina then… who knows? While Republicans like Texas Gov. Rick Perry put out feelers, with the GOP’s best hope, Gov. Chris Christie, a no go.

Whoever thought Rep. Michele Bachmann would end up in the on-deck circle for 2012? Certainly not Sarah Palin.

Read full story · Comments { 13 }

He Said What?

Dominique Strauss-Kahn is innocent until proven guilty, no matter how horrific the tale we’re currently seeing unfold or how tone deaf his friends sound.

But if Ben Stein was a stock there’d be a sell quickly order on him.

[...] People accuse other people of crimes all of the time. What do we know about the complainant besides that she is a hotel maid? I love and admire hotel maids. They have incredibly hard jobs and they do them uncomplainingly. I am sure she is a fine woman. On the other hand, I have had hotel maids that were complete lunatics, stealing airline tickets from me, stealing money from me, throwing away important papers, stealing medications from me. – Ben Stein

Mr. Strauss-Kahn is now on suicide watch at Rikers Island.

Read full story · Comments { 7 }

Rockefeller Newt and The Good Wife


The latest worst decision of Mr. Gingrich’s life was to think he could run for president while lugging around a trailer full of baggage. From Politico:

In 2005 and 2006, the former House speaker turned presidential candidate carried as much as $500,000 in debt to the premier jewelry company, according to financial disclosures filed with the Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Gingrich, who represented Georgia in Congress for two decades, retired in 1999. But his wife, Callista Gingrich, was employed by the House Agriculture Committee until 2007, according to public records. She listed a “revolving charge account” at Tiffany and Company in the liability section of her personal financial disclosure form for two consecutive years and indicated that it was her spouse’s debt. The liability was reported in the range of $250,001 to $500,000.

Callista Gingrich is the only reason anyone is giving this offensive political bomb thrower any credence at all. If she hadn’t signed on to be his moral back stop no one would have kept a straight face upon his announcement.

Read full story · Comments { 8 }

Faux Philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy Defends Dominque Strauss-Kahn

What I do know is that nothing in the world can justify a man being thus thrown to the dogs. – Bernard-Henri Lévy Defends Accused IMF Director

He’s the Charlie Sheen of philosophy, the Donald Trump of careerist showmanship, the Wall-Mart version of Sartre.

When Pres. Obama bombed Libya, this ridiculous man made sure to be on the scene, pictured with the people, his passport his platform. If he’s there it must be serious.

This pontificating blowhard has been giving France a bad name for years, until he made his sojourn to America, hoping for exactly what he’s gotten, open doors and open arms, as people in the media gobbled his drivel up with a spoon.

French “philosopher” Bernard Henri-Levy, the non-politician perhaps most responsible for getting NATO into war with Libya, has long been one of the West’s most scarequote-worthy intellectuals. There was the quoting of a literary hoax to attack Immanuel Kant, the dubious reportage from the Russia-Georgia mini-war, the now-more-than-ever defense of Roman Polanski’s “misdemeanor.” And let us not forget the eating-at-home-is-”repugnant” boast, the Daniel Pearl appropriation that led Pearl’s widow Marianne to describe BHL as “a man whose intelligence is destroyed by his own ego,” and a self-appointment as successor to Tocqueville so brazenly impotent that even Garrison Keillor rose above his usual torpor to snarl that “There’s no reason for it to exist in English, except as evidence that travel need not be broadening and one should be wary of books with Tocqueville in the title.” – BHL: France’s National Disgrace

BHL’s efforts today, however, are really one for the books. Sticking up for a buddy who allegedly sodomized a maid, with the facts and police work looking lined up and (so far) very carefully done. From TIME:

What’s the difference between a criminal sexual act and sexual abuse?

The two charges of criminal sexual act are what used to be called “sodomy” and refer to the oral sex [that Strauss-Kahn allegedly forced a hotel worker to perform on him at the Sofitel in midtown Manhattan]. Sexual abuse in the third degree is a misdemeanor touching, it’s a far less serious crime, it may have been the first time he grabbed her and touched her buttocks or breasts or some sexual part but without the force needed to drag her down the hall.

But it was easy to see it coming. From a profile in 2008 (h/t WSJ):

Ten years ago, Pierre Bourdieu coined a term for certain French intellectuals whose writings counted for less than their TV appearances. He called them “ les fast-thinkers.” Everyone knew who the sociologist had in mind as the prototype of this phenomenon. Long before the American public got used to hearing references to J-Lo and K-Fed, the French press had dubbed him BHL. His books, movies, TV appearances, political interventions, and romances have been a staple of the French media for more than three decades. But only in the past five years has he become as much a fixture in the U.S. media as the French.

[...] “You and your fellow Americans,” he wrote, “should realize that BHL is not a philosopher but a clown and a buffoon. You want real French philosophy, read Derrida, Foucault, Badiou, Baudrillard, if you are a right winger, read Aron, but please forget about this pompous arrogant shmuck BHL and his unending and shameless self-promotion. As a Frenchman, I am ashamed of BHL.”

- The Playboy Philosopher

We’re getting a very close look at the difference between European and American cultures. In America, though our scoundrels do their best to cover their tracks, there are those moments when class collapses and justice is blind, though they are still rare occasions. Madams are still prosecuted, while the johns are not, but that’s another subject for another time. But women assaulted who stand up do get their day, however torturous the walk.

The curtain has finally been pulled back exposing the playboy French “philosopher,” with Tina Brown giving him the space to prove conclusively exactly what he is and always has been, with Huffington Post already having an archive of his missives, with Howard Fineman obviously having more title than power. Propping up a con man must be good for business. He’s fooled people like Fareed Zakaria, with CNN a particularly soft landing pad for this vulgar opportunist, because who can resist “philosopher” as a title? It’s just so deeply French.

Throwing himself down for Dominque Strauss-Kahn, the whole sordid scandal has rendered BHL into primal man-boy pissyness.

It starts with the inevitable, blaming the women, the media, the culture, anything but the man caught doing what he’s been doing for years.

It’s how conspiracy theories are spawned.

I do not know—but, on the other hand, it would be nice to know, and without delay—how a chambermaid could have walked in alone, contrary to the habitual practice of most of New York’s grand hotels of sending a “cleaning brigade” of two people, into the room of one of the most closely watched figures on the planet.

[...] What I know as well is that nothing, no earthly law, should also allow another woman, his wife, admirable in her love and courage, to be exposed to the slime of a public opinion drunk on salacious gossip and driven by who knows what obscure vengeance.

Ah yes, the point is to protect the wife who condones brutish behavior and perhaps help cover it up, because it’s their marriage and not the business of others. It’s the same thing the mother thought when she convinced her daughter to stay silent, because Strauss-Kahn wasn’t really that kind of man.

And what I know even more is that the Strauss-Kahn I know, who has been my friend for 20 years and who will remain my friend, bears no resemblance to this monster, this caveman, this insatiable and malevolent beast now being described nearly everywhere. Charming, seductive, yes, certainly; a friend to women and, first of all, to his own woman, naturally, but this brutal and violent individual, this wild animal, this primate, obviously no, it’s absurd.

I resent the New York tabloid press… he whines.

I am angry with all those in France... he spits.

But he seems most angry at people who, according to him, “complacently accept the account of this other young woman, this one French, who pretends to have been the victim of the same kind of attempted rape, who has shut up for eight years but, sensing the golden opportunity, whips out her old dossier and comes to flog it on television.”

No man could be more ignorant of the shame and trauma of rape than fake philosopher, professional gadfly and man about the planet, Bernard-Henri Lévy.

The world must understand, to lose Dominque Strauss-Kahn, would be for France “to lose its champion.”

Strauss-Kahn is in jail, bail denied, until Friday, as he sits in a cell at Rikers Island. He’s innocent until proven guilty, but there’s a reason the Manhattan Special Victims Unit put him where he is today, after he was identified in a lineup, with the help of a judge who knew he was a flight risk.

Bernard-Henri Lévy has gotten away with his fake philosopher posing for a very long time. But his soft spot for pathological Lotharios has finally hung him out.

This essay has been updated.

Read full story · Comments { 2 }

Arnold Schwarzenegger & His Love Child

We told you so! Governor screws long-time staffer, produces love child, film at eleven!

Arnold joins the John Edwards Stupid club, because it’s not that he couldn’t have protected himself against fathering a love child.

Meet the spoiled man child. A macho man who thinks there are separate rules just for him, because he’s always slid by on them before. Given the Kennedy obsession it’s also just as likely that he felt he was emulating the best of the sporting man image that his closeness to the Kennedy family inspired.

Before he took office over a dozen women provided their stories of the kind of man Schwarzenegger was, but voters of California didn’t care. The sad thing for Maria Shriver is the fool factor, because if you’ve got that many women coming forward it’s a warning sign, not a signal that it’s in his past.

So, Arnold Schwarzenegger turns out to be exactly the type of man many living in Los Angeles, including myself, always heard he was. A womanizing cad who’s so selfish he didn’t even protect those he purports to love. It’s another new low for the political man class.

Former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and his wife, Maria Shriver, separated after she learned he had fathered a child more than a decade ago — before his first run for office — with a longtime member of their household staff.

Shriver moved out of the family’s Brentwood mansion earlier this year, after Schwarzenegger acknowledged the paternity. The staff member worked for the family for 20 years, retiring in January.

“After leaving the governor’s office I told my wife about this event, which occurred over a decade ago,” Schwarzenegger said Monday night in a statement issued to The Times in response to questions. “I understand and deserve the feelings of anger and disappointment among my friends and family. There are no excuses and I take full responsibility for the hurt I have caused. I have apologized to Maria, my children and my family. I am truly sorry. “I ask that the media respect my wife and children through this extremely difficult time,” the statement concluded. “While I deserve your attention and criticism, my family does not. ”

Schwarzenegger fathered a child with longtime member of household staff

The least he could have done was police his penis.

There are individuals who exert no control over their impulses because they crave the conquest. They like the thrill of strange, the excitement of the danger of illicit love. But it’s a deep character flaw that drives these insecure, selfish people into a deep hole of shame, which they also can’t seem to live without. That they drag their trusting spouses down into their depravity is the tragedy.

Maria Shriver gave up her NBC career to be first lady of California, putting her own life second to his, though she’s made the most of it and will no doubt come out ahead. She also had the smarts to move out after his admission, which came only after he left the governorship, with Shriver reportedly unhappy for quite some time.

It’s difficult to understand any woman who doesn’t leave a man who’s a serial philanderer. It was part of Hillary’s problem with young women in 2008. What type of wife puts up with this behavior year and year? But at least Bill never fathered a child.

All I ever knew of Schwarzenegger is the macho man who used to sit in the courtyard of a tiny bistro in Beverly Hills, way in the back smoking a cigar and holding court with his motorcycle buddies, as they watched women walk past on their way to go shopping. His half-closed lids, tilted head and smug demeanor set, as he scoped the woman walking by.

Womanizers very rarely give up the sport until they’re humiliated, usually taking everyone around them down too.

Now Maria Shriver joins Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy, as well as the other Kennedy wives and their related kin, all of whom loved men whose morals came out of an era that winked and nodded at philanderers as simply boys will be boys, while the women stood by in silent humiliation.

Read full story · Comments { 15 }

SNL’s It’s Great to be Obama Meets Slim Roster



This is as interesting as it is telling.

“[Sen. Claire McCaskill's] basically out of the picture for us this time around,” said an Obama ally who considers McCaskill’s absence — and the difficulty of replacing high-impact supporters like her — a potential problem.

“We need more defenders,” the ally said. Obama “is spending too much time communicating about himself for himself. … I think we’ve only had a couple of people out there speaking for us over the last two years, and clearly, that has to change.”

[...] One veteran Democrat and reliable cable-news show advocate for Obama faults the White House’s handling of messaging.

“A lot of this had to do with the arrogance the Obama people had initially,” the Democrat said. “No one was really in charge of coordinating what we did. … No one really communicated with us on a consistent basis. It’s gotten better over the last year, but they still have a way to go.”

Right now Pres. Obama’s just lucky Republicans are in such disarray. But I really don’t think this will last. There are many signs that economic issues point to soft Independent support, with the only thing that’s missing is a Republican candidate who can communicate about jobs, with a plan on the economy.

Before this is over the Republican establishment could coerce someone into the race who has been reluctant so far. …or if they can’t, this is going to be a smooth reelection ride for Barack Obama.

Read full story · Comments { 21 }

New York 26: Move to Toss-Up/Tilt Democratic

That’s the headline on Rothenberg:

With a week to go until the May 24 special election in New York’s open 26th C.D., Democrat Kathy Hochul now looks well-positioned to pull off a significant upset.

Both parties agree that the race remains close – “within the margin of error” is the phrase most often used – and Republican Jane Corwin certainly has a chance to energize and turnout GOP voters in this Republican-leaning district. But Democrats seem more enthusiastic right now.

[...] The race remains very competitive, but time is simply running out for the GOP to change the dynamic of the race, especially given the Democrats’ enthusiasm edge in the district.

We’re moving the race from Lean Republican to Toss-Up/Tilt Democratic.

Count be stunned.

But it does give you an idea of just how toxic Paul Ryan’s Medicare scheme is to people, even as Republican Tea Party types and certain presidential wannabes run into each other praising him.

Read full story · Comments { 6 }

Newt Gingrich in Damage Control After MTP Mandate Remark

White House hopeful Newt Gingrich called the House Republican plan for Medicare “right-wing social engineering,” injecting a discordant GOP voice into the party’s efforts to reshape both entitlements and the broader budget debate. In the same interview Sunday, on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Mr. Gingrich backed a requirement that all Americans buy health insurance, complicating a Republican line of attack on President Barack Obama’s health law. [...] – Gingrich Blasts House GOP’s Medicare Plan – Presidential Candidate Calls It ‘Right-Wing Social Engineering,’ Agrees With Obama About Need for Insurance Mandate

Newt Gingrich’s debut as a presidential candidate on “Meet the Press” exploded quickly. The video below began his dig out.



As Iraq was to many Democratic primary voters in 2008, health care is to Republican base voters looking for a nominee for 2012. Newt Gingrich saying close to the same thing as un-candidate Donald Trump first did on Sean Hannity’s show, revealing the tap dancing wannabe presidential candidates are going to have to learn as they navigate their Tea Party base.

Joe Scarborough, back at work today, started the incoming this morning, with Rush Limbaugh going at Newt first thing out of the gate on his radio show. For the Tea Party, anyone slamming Paul Ryan is placed on the Who’s A Real Conservative? suspect list. Expect a request from Newt Gingrich to go on Rush’s show in 3… 2…

Meanwhile, Hugh Hewitt took the opportunity to tout Mitt Romney’s “‘repeal by waiver’ strategy” wondering if his critics “missed” the “brilliance of Romney’s day-one Obamacare promise.”

Yeah, that’s it, Mitt’s “brilliance.” Ho-boy, these guys are really desperate.

Rep. Paul Ryan’s retort was classic: “With allies like that, who needs the left?”

Newt Gingrich 2.0 on “Meet the Press” might have sounded good in the general election strategy mode. But as Hillary Clinton found on Iraq, you have to first please the people who have the power to get you the nomination… or not.

Read full story · Comments { 9 }

Donald Trump Believes He Can Win But Won’t Run

**UPDATED**

“I maintain the strong conviction that if I were to run, I would be able to win the primary and ultimately, the general election,” Trump said in a statement. “I have spent the past several months unofficially campaigning and recognize that running for public office cannot be done half heartedly. Ultimately, however, business is my greatest passion and I am not ready to leave the private sector.”Trump Not Running fro President



Jake Tapper on Twitter broke the story on Twitter, with NBC affiliate having Trump’s email statement. Trump isn’t running.

Anyone heartbroken?

Post updated with screen capture from DailyCaller.

Read full story · Comments { 13 }

Obama’s Numbers Now Scare GOP Wannabes

Mike Huckabee isn’t stupid. It’s fun raking in cash instead of running a losing campaign for president.

Post birther and Bin Laden realities could push Donald Trump to make the same decision, with rumors out of the New York Post that Trump will make an announcement today. “The Apprentice” has been renewed, with NBC President Bob Greenblatt saying on Sunday he’d replace Trump in the board room if it came to that. Maybe Donny Deutsch could finally get his big break.

From a new Politico – GWU poll:

Republicans looking toward 2012 have consistently argued that the president’s reelection hinges on the economy — regardless of who emerges from the GOP field. That thesis is backed by the 15 percentage-point spread — 42 percent to 57 percent — between those polled who approve and disapprove of Obama’s handling of the economy.

But the president seems — at least for now — surprisingly immune to economic fears, the poll shows. Fifty-two percent of those surveyed approve of Obama’s handling of his job, up 7 percentage points from the most recent Battleground Poll, conducted in October. Additionally, 72 percent approve of Obama personally, up 7 percentage points since October.

People may be dissatisfied with Pres. Obama, but as of today they have no real options amidst the Republican field. Though if Newt Gingrich’s appearance on “Meet the Press” is any indication of what could unfold, I’d say we’re in for a few surprises. Newt 2.0 isn’t scary and that’s a good start for him considering he really shouldn’t have any chance at all.

Read full story · Comments { 8 }

Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s ‘Womanizing’ History Protected by Women & Press

Strauss-Kahn’s alleged womanising appears to have been an open secret in French political circles for years. Thierry Saussez, a former adviser to Sarkozy, who took part in the TV show with Banon, said: “All this stupefaction from people is sheer hypocrisy. Everyone in Paris has known for years he had something of a problem. Not many female journalists are prepared to interview him alone these days.” – Dominique Strauss-Kahn faces further claim of sexual assault

The AP is reporting that the “great seducer,” who also happens to be the man who was on his way to possibly being the next president of France, has been picked out of a lineup by the French maid he allegedly assaulted.

Now Dominique Strauss-Kahn has been reduced to disgrace in wild YouTube videos.



Charming.

The plot has also thickened. That’s because where there is one there is almost always another.

However, why would a mother of a daughter who’d been traumatized by Strauss-Kahn sacrifice her? Why would Strauss-Kahn’s wife forgive him for womanizing that looks now went well beyond consensual sex? Why would the French female journalistic community cover up what’s widely suspected, perhaps even known?

Beats the hell out of me, but a failure of integrity is certainly at the core of this cover up.

Tristane Banon was in her 20s and writing a book when she approached Strauss-Kahn for an interview in 2002. In a TV programme in 2007, in which Strauss-Kahn’s name had been bleeped out, Banon allegedly described him as a “rutting chimpanzee” and described how she was forced to fight him off. “It finished badly … very violently … I kicked him,” Banon said. “When we were fighting, I mentioned the word ‘rape’ to make him afraid, but it didn’t have any effect. I managed to get out.”

[...] Banon’s mother, Anne Mansouret, told journalists on Sunday night she had dissuaded her daughter from legal action because she believed Strauss-Kahn’s behaviour had been out of character and because of close links with his family. “Today I am sorry to have discouraged my daughter from complaining. I bear a heavy responsibility,” she said.

Ms. Mansouret should be ashamed of herself.

Guardian is reporting another woman allegedly fell victim to Dominique Strauss-Kahn, which surfaced after the IMF

By this time next year, Dominique Strauss-Kahn might well have been president of France. The 62-year-old was by far the most popular choice to be the Socialist presidential candidate, and he was the only contender seen as capable of unseating Nicolas Sarkozy.

But now his plan to run for the Elysée Palace appears to be in ruins, even without resolution of the New York case, after further allegations against him were broadcast on French television on Sunday night.

A local official of the Socialist party claimed that Strauss-Kahn had attacked her daughter, who is goddaughter to Strauss-Kahn’s second wife, in 2002.

Silence is not golden when a “rutting chimpanzee” of a man in power abuses his position.

France can ban the burqa, but until they relieve their culture of the timidity to hold marauding men accountable when they attack a female it only amounts to a worthless show that leaves the biggest job undone.

Read full story · Comments { 4 }

Being Cynical Required

Every year in mid-May, many Palestinians observe what they call “the nakba,” or catastrophe, the anniversary of Israel’s declaration of independence in 1948 and the war in which hundreds of thousands of Palestinians lost their homes through expulsion and flight. But this was the first year that Palestinian refugees and their supporters in Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and Egypt, inspired by the recent protests around the Arab world, tried to breach Israel’s military border from all sides. – Israeli Troops Fire as Marchers Breach Borders

Andrew exum on the latest events along the Israeli border, with this item jumping out:

5. Israel has been kidding itself if it had imagined itself immune from the non-violent, peaceful protests that have been sweeping the Arabic-speaking world. You can dismiss today’s events in northern Israel as a plot engineered by the Syrians, Iranians and their proxies. But the Palestinian cause is a real and enduring one. What happens when the Palestinians in the West Bank start demanding statehood not through violence but through peaceful protests? How will Israel respond? One option they do not have is to bury their heads in the sand and pretend like the call for Palestinian statehood will go away. And good luck whenever some clever Palestinian leader starts organizing peaceful marches on some crazy hilltop settlements in the West Bank, counting on provoking the kind of response that the media in Israel and abroad will eat up.

Exum punches the obvious Syrian note, making it #1 on his list, which Jeffrey Goldberg happily latches on to. I’m certainly not going to get in an argument with Exum, but Assad hasn’t been too worried about having cover so far.

Where I think today’s border clashes revolve is around #5 above, with the Arab spring finally coming to Israel’s borders. It seems pretty obvious that Israel has been kidding itself for a long time.

Someone needs to tell me why we shouldn’t expect the IDF to defend Israel’s borders on “Nakba Day,” accompanied with the predictable coverage we’re seeing now, especially on the Right.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called for “restraint” late Sunday, which his really rather ludicrous considering the players involved.

Read full story · Comments { 2 }

The Humans and the Superhero Connection


What does it take to get an open thread around here?

It’s the photo we’ve all seen, so on this beautiful spring Sunday enjoy and the floor is yours.

Any topic goes in the comments.

Via The Atlantic, the line up and the superhero connection:

1. Vice President Biden as The Flash

2. President Obama as Captain America

3. Air Force Brigadier General Marshall Webb, Assistant Commanding General, Joint Special Operations Command, as Superman

4. Deputy National Security Advisor Denis McDonough as Green Lantern

5. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as Wonder Woman

6. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates as Martian Manhunter

7. Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as Spider-Man

8. National Security Adviser Thomas Donilon as Batman

9. Chief of Staff William Daley as Spawn

10. Antony Blinken, National Security Adviser to Vice President Biden, as The Crow

11. Audrey Tomason, the National Security Council’s Director for Counterterrorism, as Catwoman.

12. John Brennan, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism as Captain Marvel (with Kree DNA).

13. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper as possibly the Cartoon Network version of Robin, or maybe just a guy in sunglasses.

Read full story · Comments { 17 }

Your Sunday Early-Bird News Round-Up

Good morning and welcome to Sunday.

On this day in history, May 15, 1886, poet Emily Dickinson died.











I’ve scoured the internets and rounded up some links so you don’t have to go too far for your news:

~Senator John Kerry has introduced a bill in the Senate that would help prevent homelessness among our nations youth. The bill focuses on children and teens in foster care and includes a provision which specifically provides protection and support for LGBT youth. Good for him.

~Meet the new 2012 side show: Ron Paul. He would not have voted for the Civil Rights Act and he would like you to know that property rights are sacrosanct. Yup, he’s a Republican alright.

~The White House waited until Friday afternoon at 4:30p.m. to release a statement saying that Senator George Mitchell, special envoy for Mideast Peace, had resigned to spend more time with his family, or something along those lines. And why shouldn’t we just accept that rationale? Well, for one thing, it wouldn’t be Washington and it wouldn’t be politics if everybody didn’t start trying to divine some significance from not only the resignation itself, but its timing. Remember, the WH saves all the announcements that it doesn’t want to talk about for the Friday afternoon news dump in the hopes that by Monday, the media will have magically forgotten about it. And second, Mitchell’s resignation shines an unwanted spotlight on the fact that not only has the Obama administration made no progress in peace talks, there has arguably been significant backsliding since the Bush administration. Some are saying that Mitchell and Ross didn’t see eye to eye and Mitchell wanted Obama to use his upcoming speech on the events in the Mideast to put forth a US plan for Israeli-Palestinian peace, but Obama rejected that at Ross’ urging. Former Israeli negotiator Daniel Levy has an interesting take on the resignation here. And Steve Clemons also has a good take on the resignation- one which seems more politically accurate than Levy’s analysis.

~On the same subject, the person who released the Palestine Papers has come forward and revealed himself- and explains why he leaked the secret documents.

~Obama has largely continued the Clinton and Bush administration’s dumping of vast sums of money into the physical and virtual border fence project on the U.S.-Mexico border. The virtual fence system was a boondoggle that enriched private security contractors to the tune of about $1 billion taxpayer dollars but here’s the problem- it never worked. But Obama is going to dump about $750 million more into the failed project.

~Why is the administration giving Bahrain a pass with regards to its brutal crackdown on protesters? Two words: Fifth Fleet. More here.

~Shirley Sherrod, the Department of Agriculture employee who was forced out after slimeball Andrew Breitbart posted a heavily-edited and misleading video of remarks she made at an NAACP event, is returning to work at the USDA on a civil rights project.

~Fox News: “Subsidies” for NPR and Planned Parenthood are wrong, but subsidies for Big Oil are worth defending.

~President Obama’s answer to high gas prices? Getting serious about an energy policy and throwing his full political weight behind it? No. Speed up oil and gas drilling on public land and water.

~The big loser in the John Ensign mess- Senator Tom Coburn. It would seem that based on the allegations contained in the Ethics Committee report, Sen. Coburn may have an ethics investigation in his near future.

~This week in stupid bigotry: Bryan Fischer of the American Family Association said that Muslims are less intelligent because of 1400 years of inbreeding:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaTnrwMwhT4&feature=player_embedded]

~This is an important story that isn’t being covered by the MSM- The Nation and PBS investigated the work of the government’s Detainee Abuse Task Force and found out that it was essentially a total fraud, or “whitewash” according to some who were actually part of the task force.

~The waters along the Mississippi continue to rise.

~A delegation of Libyan rebels left the White House Friday without the formal recognition they had sought.

~Blackwater has been reborn. Again. Blackwater founder Erik Prince is setting up a mercenary, secret army for the United Arab Emirates. One of its jobs will be to suppress pro-democracy movements for our ally. Boy, the post-9/11 landscape has been GREAT for the security/private contractor business, hasn’t it?

~Nick Kristof reminds us, and the Obama administration, of what the late Richard Holbrooke knew about Afghanistan. We now know that the administration effectively silenced Holbrooke because what he had to say did not gel with the administration’s hawkish stance.

~The IMF chief has been arrested on allegations of sex assault. You can’t make this stuff up.

~A Washington Post investigation found that hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars have been wasted by the agency, Housing and Urban Development (HUD), while enriching contractors.

~An interesting interview with Essam El-Erian of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Washington Post.

~Will healthcare be Mitt Romney’s Waterloo?

~The Taliban is now on Twitter. Most of the tweets were in Pashto but they have recently started tweeting in English.

~I’ll leave you with this moment of Zen- Donald Trump’s thin skin:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZbb_oYNhGo]

The End.

Read full story · Comments { 7 }

Mike Huckabee Won’t Run for President in 2012

“All the factors say go, but my heart says no,” Huckabee, who was considered the GOP frontrunner in several national polls, said on his Fox News Channel show. – Fox News Channel

That earthquake you just felt was the ground opening up for Sarah Palin. She couldn’t have even entertained the presidency if Mike Huckabee had been in.

Fox News Channel even gave a bonus to their viewers. Immediately after Mike Huckabee’s announcement Donald trump had a political cameo pronouncing other Republican candidates will be thrilled with this news.

One person many won’t think of is Rep. Michele Bachmann, who is more formidable in early primary states than people think. Without Huckabee she’s in the strong position in Iowa, a very good state for her for multiple reasons, including that it’s her home state, but also because of her home school crew, as well as her staunch conservative views. Now all she has to do is make the decision.

Post bin Laden’s killing, perhaps Huckabee looked at Pres. Obama, then comparing his own clemency record as Arkansas governor, thought he’d never survive the comparison.
This post has been updated.

Read full story · Comments { 6 }

Queer Talk: ‘Key Figures,’ ‘Prominent Donors,’ and the rest of us

The Politico piece that appeared earlier this week, “Gay donors fuel President Obama’s 2012 campaign,” continues to generate conversation. It takes a special kind of perspective to assert, as those quoted in the Politico article do, that LGBTs are coming together in unified support of Obama. Using the terms employed in the article, that’s the “key figures” and “prominent donors” view, or at least it’s that of those quoted in the article, including: Ethan Geto, a NY lobbyist and “key figure in Dean’s gay fundraising; “Fred Sainz, the vice president for communications for the Human Rights Campaign”; and “Jeff Soref, a prominent gay donor and activist.”

Pam Spaulding summarized things nicely: “The important thing to note … (is) that Team Obama feels it has already corralled the $upport of the big gay donor$ (and the bundler$ who bring in the buxxx). I doubt they are concerned about the little lgbt ATMs out there like you and me.”

“You and me,” the rest of us diverse but all non-Access people, come to our varying views, but all from the Outside. So, what have we viewed lately?

Shortly after the generalities about “gay donors,” candidate Obama went to El Paso to talk about immigration reform. You see the same kind of Access spinning, as well as the same kind of dissent from “the rest of” the non-Access people.

Bruce Dixon, at Black Agenda Report, has a strong piece up this week, “The Black President and the Brown Vote,” quoting Roberto Lovato, co-founder of Presente.Org:

The president is convening panels of Latino celebrities, asking them to spread the word about the good work he’s doing for our people. But it’s not working … as well as he needs it to. There is a solid and growing base of people and organizations in our communities who just aren’t buying it.

From Presente.Org, regarding the DREAM Act, which would allow U.S. citizen eligibility to some undocumented young people, through college or military service:

The President has the power to … issue an Executive Order that would stop the deportation of DREAMers until we get critical legislation passed. If President Obama is committed about solving our immigration crisis … then that’s exactly what he should do.

The similarities in strategies and in spinning are clear. For immigration reform activists, we suddenly see the DREAM Act back in legislative / political play. Senate Democrats reintroduced it May 11. On political cue, the Republicans responded via long-time DREAM co-sponsor Republican Senator Lugar, who withdrew his support. Through Lugar spokesman Mark Helmke: “President Obama’s appearance in Texas framed immigration as a divisive election issue instead of attempting a legitimate debate on comprehensive reform.”

Familiar spins of Electeds and Insiders, Right and Left.

In Queerdom, the Obama version of advocacy has been an incremental stop-and-go ride, with accompanying efforts from the Right to defeat and delay. Persistent pressure on the WH and Congress, along with the 2012 campaign season, eventually brought some efforts toward two of the biggest queer “issues,” DADT and DOMA.

This past week we saw the latest DOMA installment: after some of the usual back and forth, the DOJ eventually announced they will continue to enforce DOMA, as related to deportation. As Joe Sudbay wrote:

Just in case the LGBT community was beginning to think that the Obama administration had turned a corner on the deportations of legally married spouses, DOJ wants us to know we were wrong. DOJ’s spokesperson, possibly trying to assuage the right-wingers on Capitol Hill, made the definitive statement that DOJ will continue to defend DOMA … .

At about the same time, on May 10, the DOJ also made it clear, again, that DADT will be enforced through the repeal process. Via Aravosis:

The Obama Department of Justice today asked the court to throw out a case in which the ACLU … (is) challenging the fact that the Obama administration continues to dock the retirement pay of gay servicemembers kicked out under DADT. Why do they dock their pay? ‘For homosexuality.’

… not only is the Obama administration defending paying gay servicemembers less, they explained their defense by comparing us to drunks and drug addicts (and to people who are a threat to national security).

With 2012 in their Right minds, Republican legislators continued their courageous defense against all things homosexual. The House Armed Services Committee (HASC) spent 16 hours debating the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act. Concerns about national security? A much too extended military? Budget problems? Nah. The Republicans are focused on the scary things they just know will happen if the repeal of DADT is allowed.

Via a May 12, Servicemembers Legal Defense Network release:
“As we … warned supporters of repeal over the last few weeks, the HASC passed harmful amendments aimed at delaying and derailing repeal implementation … .” Earlier in the week, SLDN sent a letter, signed by a wide coalition of organizations, to HASC members, urging rejection of the Anti-DADT repeal amendments, which are linked to DOMA (a nice two-fer for the Reps):

In the letter, (SLDN’s) Sarvis directly addresses expected amendments prompted by the release of guidance by the Navy regarding same-sex marriages and the use of chapels on naval bases. Specifically, on April 13, the Navy Chief of Chaplains issued guidance to Chaplains and Religious Program Specialists regarding use of base facilities following repeal of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ (DADT) and found ‘base facility use is sexual orientation neutral.’

The Navy changed its mind about such facility use, even before the amendment votes. Which passed.

Via Houseblend:

First Congressman Duncan Hunter’s (R-CA) amendment to … expand (DADT) certification to service chiefs: ayes 33, noes 27. Amendment is agreed to.

And … roll call on (Rep. Todd) Akin’s (R-MO) amendment to restrict use of military facilities for same-sex marriages: ayes 38, noes 23. Amendment is agreed to.

… Rep. Vicky Hartzler (R-MO) … amendment to restate #DOMA for the #military: ayes are 39, noes are 22. Amendment is agreed to.

One voice from the Right was that of Tony Perkins (via JoeMyGod): “If the administration keeps pounding its agenda through the military, we’ll need the Navy SEALs to rescue marriage.” That Tony, he’s clever with words.

The political maneuverings, regarding immigration reform or LGBT “issues,” are examples of how the Insider / Access / I’m-closer-to-the-Oligarchy-than-you do business. And campaigns. What “the rest of us” do isn’t their call. It’s ours.

Read full story · Comments { 8 }

My $0.02/Saturday: Self-governance

Anthony and Stanton

Morning, news (& history!) junkies.

My weekend roundup is going to be more heavy on history this Saturday (though there will be news sprinkled in too), because “what is past is prologue,” and that applies very much to the present-day rollback of women’s fundamental rights to govern themselves.

On This Day in History (May 14)

In 1863, Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton suspended work on women’s suffrage to form the Women’s National Loyal League, which held its first convention on May 14, 1863, at the Church of the Puritans, NYNY. I’ll let you decide how much of a history lesson you want on a Saturday morning–if yes, click over and view the leaflet calling for a meeting of “loyal women of the nation” to discuss the Civil war, along with a transcription of a letter on the second leaf, from Susan B. Anthony to Amy Post. But, I do want to highlight one particular excerpt from what Anthony said at the convention:

SUSAN B. ANTHONY: This resolution brings in no question, no ism. It merely makes the assertion that in a true democracy, in a genuine republic, every citizen who lives under, the government must have the right of representation. You remember the maxim, ” Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed.” This is the fundamental principle of democracy; and before our Government can be a true democracy- before our republic can be placed upon lasting and enduring foundations -the civil and political rights of every citizen must, be practically established. This is the assertion of the resolution. It Is a philosophical statement. It is Dot because women suffer, it is Dot because slaves suffer, it is not because of any individual rights or wrongs it is the simple assertion of the great fundamental truth of democracy that was proclaimed by our Revolutionary fathers. I hope the discussion will no longer be continued as to the comparative rights or wrongs of one class or another. The question before us is: Is it possible that peace and union shall be established in this country ; is it possible for this Government to be a true democracy, a genuine republic, while one-sixth or one-half of the people are disfranchised?

Conservative women’s groups have tried to subvert feminism and reappropriate this feminist pioneer as one of their own in their crusade against the autonomy, privacy, and equity of all women, but Susan B. Anthony shared a mutual admiration with the socialist movement and was a suffragist, abolitionist, and practitioner of civil disobedience for which she was brought to trial. As evidenced in the passage above, what drove her tireless championing of civil rights for both women and blacks was a core belief in the inalienable right to self-governance.

Last Year…This Year

A year ago today, Sarah Palin gave her address to the conservative and so-called “Susan B. Anthony List,” and a week later, history of women historians Ann Gordon and Lynn Sherr debunked the “feminists for life” mythology that Susan B. Anthony was a pro-life activist. Naturally this didn’t convince the FFL and SBA-List crowd any more than Obama releasing his long-form birth certificate convinced Orly ” it says African, not Negro” Taitz.

This is a screenshot I took of the SBA-List homepage on Thursday morning of this week:

Here is an FFL news bulletin from February 2011 that shows you what they were up to on SBA’s birthday and throughout Women’s History Month in March:

New Campaign Beginning on Susan B. Anthony’s Birthday

February 2011

To make holistic, woman-centered solutions a reality and effect lasting change, Feminists for Life members need information and tools. To effectively advocate for women and systematically eliminate the root causes that drive women to abortion, Feminists for Life needs members.

On Susan B. Anthony’s birthday, February 15th, Feminists for Life will launch a new campaign lasting through the end of Women’s History Month in March. Together we will celebrate our rich feminist history and reach out to educate others, encouraging them to join us in creating practical resources and support for pregnant women and parents.

Well, “practical resources and support for pregnant women and parents” sounds great and all, but if one of your sister groups has given top priority to defunding Planned Parenthood in Susan B. Anthony’s name and your Grizzly-go-tos are going to make vacuous remarks like “Hells no. I would not vote to increase that debt ceiling,” that really shows, on so many levels, how fake this call for practical resources for women is. If you want to defund planned parenthood and cut public spending on everything but the neverending war machine, then you’re not interested in helping anyone…other than the oligarchy, that is.

Continue Reading →

Read full story · Comments { 7 }