TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Archive | August, 2011

Obama Serves Soft Ball to Republicans, Boehner Whiffs It

The speech will fall on the same night Texas Gov. Rick Perry makes his debut on the 2012 GOP debate stage. The Republican presidential field is set to take part in a debate, also scheduled to begin at 8 p.m., at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif. The debate will go on as scheduled, NBC said in a statement Wednesday. Asked whether the speech was purposefully scheduled the same night as the Republican debate, White House press secretary Jay Carney said, “Of course not.” – Obama schedules jobs address to coincide with GOP 2012 debate

President Barack Obama signs a hand as he greets people along a rope line at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport in St. Paul, Minn., Aug. 30, 2011. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

Who does Jay Carney think he’s kidding? Plouffe blinked for one reason only. Pres. Obama’s numbers are abysmal.

But Pres. Obama is playing little league politics.

And so, when the White House announced today that President Obama would deliver his much-anticipated jobs speech on Sept. 7 at 8 pm — the exact same day and time that the 2012 Republican candidates are scheduled to debate in California — the idea that the timing was purely coincidental was, well, far-fetched. It’s clear that this White House saw an opportunity to drive a major — and direct — contrast between President Obama and his potential Republican rivals and took it. – Chris Cilizza

So it’s fitting Speaker Boehner decided to play pony league politics. But he’s following Rush Limbaugh’s advice. From Sam Stein, here’s a snippet of Boehner’s response to Pres. Obama:

…With the significant amount of time – typically more than three hours – that is required to allow for a security sweep of the House Chamber before receiving a President, it is my recommendation that your address be held on the following evening, when we can ensure there will be no parliamentary or logistical impediments that might detract from your remarks. As such, on behalf of the bipartisan leadership and membership of both the House and Senate, I respectfully invite you to address a Joint Session of Congress on Thursday, September 8, 2011 in the House Chamber, at a time that works best for your schedule. We look forward to hearing your ideas and working together to solve America’s jobs crisis.

This is an unprecedented request, so it’s back to the White House.

However, does anyone believe if Obama was in the reelection driver’s seat he’d be playing at this level? He’s serving up an easy pitch to Republicans, making the debate a must see event.

The real winners in this one is NBC’s Brian Williams and Politico’s Jonathan Martin who will be hosting the Reagan Library debate next week.

Somehow I doubt that Nancy Reagan is amused.

Read full story · Comments { 26 }

Gloria Steinem to Headline Obama Park Avenue Fundraiser

“… Without the women’s vote — because women comprise the majority of the electorate — it’s virtually impossible for a candidate to win the election.” – Jennifer Lawless, director of the Women and Politics Institute at American University

This is the alternate, political version of why buy the milk if the cow is free?, with the biggest feminist names in Democratic politics giving away their power for a President who not only served up women’s freedoms and codified the Hyde Amendment, but also put entitlements on the table, which keep women out of poverty in old age. …and I guess everyone forgot the debt ceiling debate began without one single woman in the room.

So, to review where women have been in the Democratic debt ceiling debacle. Pres. Obama’s debt ceiling meeting started with not one single woman in the room.

At Blair House, the old boys club meeting has consisted of Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA), U.S. Senators John Kyl (R-AZ), Daniel Inouye (D-HI), Max Baucus (D-MT), Reps. Jim Clyburn (D-SC), and Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), who have convened for the budget negotiations with Vice President Biden, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, Budget Director Jack Lew, and economic adviser Gene Sperling. Where are the women? – National Council of Women’s Organization

Amanda Terkel’s report on Gloria Steinem headlining a huge fundraiser for Pres. Obama’s reelection is conclusive proof that today’s establishment women do not take their power or purpose in politics seriously anymore. Instead of taking a page from Richard Trumka, the Democratic girls are all in, succumbing to practical politics, because if they take on Democrats and Republicans win things will only get worse, or so the lunacy goes.

Women elect presidents, but this is the best progressive and Democratic women in positions of power can do?

These ladies have gotten comfortable with their titles, power and access, so they’ve gotten lazy and we’re all going to pay.

Ms. Steinem made her name by standing up against the odds women faced. With no one close to her power in place to take on what’s been happening in the Democratic Party, Steinem is left as a historic figurehead at the top of a fundraiser that means very little to most women today.

But it does represent the lowered value of Democratic ideals, with all that’s left is a show, with very little substance being represented. Now even the most powerful women on the Left have been suckered by the lure of money, while becoming part of the embarrassment of the elite machine without utilizing the power they’ve earned to get something better for women from the establishment they support.

First Lady Michelle Obama, longtime feminist activist Gloria Steinem and several other prominent Democratic women will be the featured guests at a fundraiser in New York City next month for President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign, in an effort to mobilize and energize Democratic women for 2012. The Park Avenue fundraiser on Sept. 20 will also feature EMILY’s List President Stephanie Schriock, Planned Parenthood Federation of America President Cecile Richards and Democratic National Committee Chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.). – Gloria Steinem To Headline Obama Fundraiser In New York City

A Park Avenue fundraiser, oh, it’s just so perfect for the current Democratic Party image, but especially for the women who wield power in it.

Never have Democrats been so far removed from the working man and woman.

Attending Democratic women may not all be part of the fan politics brigade of Pres. Obama’s He Can Do No Wrong Crowd, instead driven by practicalities in politics when looking at the Tea Party crowd, but hitching a ride on the Obama reelect bandwagon that has little luster and no connection to the average woman or her plight makes this crowd look Republican, the old school version.

Gloria Steinem, First Lady Michele Obama, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Stephanie Schriock, Cecile Richards and other Democratic women participating in this fundraising event don’t remotely represent the majority of women who’ll vote in 2012.

We’re mad as hell and don’t see any benefits to supporting a system that has locked our issues out and put our lives in economic jeopardy.

From a recent AP-GFK poll:

Women no longer are a bright spot for Obama.

At the 100-day mark of his presidency, they gave him significantly higher approval ratings than did men, 68 percent to 60 percent. That’s since fallen dramatically.

In the latest AP-GfK survey, less than half of all women and less than half of all men approve of the job Obama is doing. Just 50 percent of women said Obama deserves re-election.

Predictably, Clinton’s bundlers are all in too. The establishment is nothing if not a cozy click.

Perhaps the thought of Rick Perry taking Obama’s place is already doing the job, starting with revving up the insiders femmes, because a Tea Party takeover is a harrowing thought.

But since women have the power to elect the next president it’s interesting high profile Democratic women are using theirs to reelect Barack Obama, instead of leveraging the power we do have to make all the presidential wannabes court us.

What are women going to get for all this Park Avenue partying?

What are poor women going to get?

I wish I could say this whole spectacle surprises me, but practical politics is easier than waging a fight against elite Democrats you need to keep your organization afloat, especially since you have no intention of organizing women to do something monumental, like demand these corporate jackals tell us what they’re going to do to make our lives freer, our economic lives more secure, and our retirement security intact.

You don’t give away your vote or your money on the promise of something not quantified in policy specifics or a record that guarantees your getting your money’s worth.

Read full story · Comments { 17 }

Obama and His Base, Mitt and Rick

Way down at the bottom of the latest CNN poll:

Meanwhile, the survey indicates that number of Democrats and independents who lean towards the Democratic party who would like the party to nominate someone else besides President Barack Obama has topped out after months of steady growth. Seventy-two percent of Democrats want to see Obama re-nominated, with 27 percent wanting a different candidate. That’s virtually unchanged since early August, although it is higher than in June.

The 27% isn’t a problem unless come November 2012 these people stay home, which could be a real issue. If almost 30% are disgruntled now with Pres. Obama, what could he do to entice them to come out to vote?

Is Rick Perry’s candidacy enough to make that happen?

Mitt Romney thinks it is, because he’s convinced Perry’s motor mouth will be a problem for Republicans. Guess what? He’s correct and in the coming weeks we may see that reality in action.

From Mark Thiessen:

Why should Romney attack Perry directly when the Democrats, the liberal media and Michele Bachmann will do it for him? Romney’s strategists note that Perry will have to survive five debates in six weeks — ample opportunity for Bachmann to “rip his eyes out” (as she did to Tim Pawlenty) or for Perry to blow himself up.

Well, “Romney’s strategists” also have to know that even if their candidate ultimately prevails, he’s going to need the Tea Party voters who prefer Perry, but also Bachmann and Rand Paul.

Romney also wouldn’t be the first presidential nominee out of Massachusetts who needed a Texan to help him win the White House, though the resemblances end there.

Read full story · Comments { 9 }

Queer Talk: Will HRC change with Solmonese’ departure?

Joyce L. Arnold: Liberal, lesbian, Independent, equality activist, writer.

“The timing of Solmonese’s resignation, as related to 2012, is at least curious – why would HRC make such a change as the presidential campaign moves into high gear?”

The Human Rights Campaign is probably the most widely recognized LGBT organization in the nation, not surprising since it has the biggest budget. It receives both praise and criticism. One reason for the latter is because the famous “HRC Annual Dinners,” held in various cities around the nation, take many thousands of local dollars to DC. I am totally in favor of DC advocacy. I’m just as certain, however, that state and local organizations are equally vital.

Another criticism is that HRC has basically become an extension of the DNC, a view reinforced when in May of this year, HRC announced its endorsement of Obama. No doubt the decision made sense for some Insiders, but for many Outsiders, it appeared to be yet another indication of HRC / DNC coziness.

HRC’s August 27 announcement that Joe Solmonese is leaving his six year stint as president (following Pam Spaulding’s breaking the story on August 26), has raised numerous questions. Naturally there is interest in who will replace him, and some speculation that Solmonese will take a position in the Obama administration, though others discount that possibility. At LBGTWeekly,for example: “Given Solmonese’s salary level, it is unlikely that he will be joining the Obama administration as many have suggested … .”

From the HRC press release:

The co-chairs of … (HRC’s) Board of Directors and the … Foundation Board today announced that … Joe Solmonese has informed the boards that he will not renew his contract which expires March 31, 2012. Solmonese will remain at the helm of the organization until the completion of his contract to ensure a smooth leadership transition.

At the same time, the co-chairs announced the formation of a search committee … .

According to Bil Browning at Bilerico, Solmonese’s decision to resign “at the end of his contract has been a ‘known secret’ to many pundits and journalists for months … .”

That seems a bit strange, if the board was caught by surprise. But whatever insiders and pundits know or guess about why and when Solmonese made the announcement, the larger question is: will HRC use this opportunity to make some changes to an organization that is viewed by significant numbers of people as much too close to the Democratic Party? Another query is in regard to HRC’s rather tenuous support of the transgender and bisexual communities. In 2007, Solmonese spoke at Southern Comfort, an annual transgender conference in Atlanta, declaring HRC’s full support of a trans-inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA). Then, with the 2007/2008 version of ENDA, he changed HRC’s position, and agreed to remove “transgender,” creating a huge backlash. Later, HRC returned to the trans-inclusive version. Will HRC use this moment to take steps toward being more inclusive, in substantive ways?

The timing of Solmonese’s resignation, as related to 2012, is at least curious – why would HRC make such a change as the presidential campaign moves into high gear? Even if, as is reported by Chris Geidner at Metroweekly, the resignation came as a surprise to the HRC Board, the decision surely didn’t come without prior and relevant Insider HRC conversations.

Maybe “why now” is in part because of the consistent critiques. A few of those follow. But first, this from the HRC release:

When Solmonese began at HRC in 2005, the organization was fighting the Federal Marriage Amendment and now marriage equality is a reality in six states and the District of Columbia with more within sight. Under Solmonese’s leadership we saw the passage of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, the repeal of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ and numerous administrative changes … .

Now, this is what advocacy organizations do – take credit for accomplishments. And there is no doubt HRC plays an important role. But it’s equally as certain that this kind of spin, with no mention of the vital work done at state and local levels, nor that of other national organizations, is a part of HRC’s problem.

Among those offering assessment is Pam Spaulding, who wrote in her news breaking piece:

We can review and critique the effectiveness of Solmonese’s tenure in the growth of the organization and political savvy in working with the Hill all day long, but it’s time to think about the job his successor has in front of him/her.

With the perception of the HRC leadership as the province of wealthy white gay men living in gay-friendly environs, there are several questions HRC … will face:

… Will more bisexual and trans staff be added with the staff shake-up? …

Will this shift signal a change to include more people of color in positions of influence?…

What kind of relationship will the HRC build with the LGBT media (including bloggers) and grassroots activists (like GetEqual) under new leadership?

Via Queerty, HRC’s Joe Solmonese To Jump Ship Right Before 2012 Elections summarizes: “Now we get to play, ‘Who will the HRC hire next to defend Obama throughout the 2012 election season?’”

At Towleroad:

A good many gay intellectuals regard the HRC as the Halliburton of gay rights – a cog in the ‘non-profit industrial complex,’ monopolizing gay politics by dint of its fabulous piles of money and establishment connections.

Calling for Solmonese’s resignation has been a common refrain. In late 2009, he was attacked for urging the LGBT community to be patient with President Obama …

I question the “gay intellectuals” description, at least if by that the discontent with HRC at the grassroots level is being diminished. Pointing to unhappiness with that 2009 call for “patience,” is accurate.

According to Jim Burroway at Box Turtle:

Kevin Naff at The Washington Blade says … his sources … deny that Solmonese’s resignation will foreshadow a change in direction or staff at HRC.

All we know at this point is that Solmonese is leaving. David Badash at New Civil Rights Movement writes it’s:

a great opportunity to think about the needs of our community, and the resources we … are putting toward them.

I hope lots of people will let HRC know their thoughts, and that HRC is listening. We’ll see.

(Photo via The Advocate)

Read full story · Comments { 4 }

We’ve Got Power


Streaming live video by Ustream

…and we’re back.

I must say I did enjoy looking at fashion magazines with a flashlight last night, though since I’m a creature of the 21st century having power is preferred. (The flip side of my reading life, which right now is No Ordinary Time, reminding me about when Democrats were Democrats.)

Seems fitting to offer an interview with Al Gore, though what he said put the Daily Caller into hyper crankiness. They also didn’t like Gore taking on Rick Perry.

This is the last week of summer before recess, so it’s a kick back week around here.

The floor is yours. Happy power Monday.

Read full story · Comments { 7 }

The Sunday Early Bird News Round Up: Hurricane Edition

Good morning and welcome to Sunday. I hope that all those in the path of the hurricane are staying safe. I’m trying to get this post out quick before we lose power here in Boston. My youngest cat, Ziggy, is going nuts- more so than usual- so I guess that means something is coming.

On this day in history, August 28, 1963, the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom took place in the nation’s capital, where more than 200,000 people listened as the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his “I Have a Dream” speech in Washington, D.C.

Some news for those of you that still have, you know, electricity:

~Irene has hit and sadly, already there have been several deaths. Naturally, Ron Paul thinks FEMA is for wimps. Google Maps has created a cool webpage where you can track Irene.

~Hey people, that story you heard about taping up your windows to prevent them from breaking? MYTH. I learned that the hard way during a category 5 hurricane in Grenada. I might as well have used saran wrap. This tape job is particularly ineffective.

~Oh look, it’s an anti-gay Republican legislator in Puerto Rico posting naked photos of himself on a gay website.

~If you didn’t see this earlier this week, it’s worth a look- Glenn Greenwald slams President Obama on MSNBC’s The Last Word for his selective application of the law to protect political elites from the consequences of their crimes (ie. Dick Cheney etc.) while using broad Executive powers to go after government whistleblowers and even journalists. There’s more on that here.

~The Battle of the Hair- Perry vs. Romney: This Time It’s Personal. *yawn*

~This is classic- Iran urges the Syrian government to heed the calls of its people. OF course the same doesn’t apply to Tehran. They must be getting nervous.

~Leon Panetta is already turning out to be a huge disappointment, not that that is all that surprising. In response to a very reasonable question about the economic and practical considerations of fighting multiple wars even as Al Qaeda is considerably weakened in places like Afghanistan, Panetta basically says that wars shouldn’t end until all terrorists who threaten us are gone. Brilliant. As Think Progress notes, Al Qaeda is present in some form or another in at least 70 countries.

~Speaking of Al Qaeda, the government has announced that they killed Al Qaeda’s “number 2″ leader in Pakistan, which I’m sure will just thrill the Pakistani goverment.

~Wikileaks has released almost 4,000 State Dept. cables regarding our diplomacy with Israel. This docudump has largely been ignored by the mainstream media but has been covered a little bit in Israeli media and some non-mainstream sources.

~Several lawmakers are asking the State Department to look into Blackwater founder, Erik Prince’s, latest foray into the lucrative business of killing people. He has been hired by our ally in Abu Dhabi, Sheik Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, to create a mercenary army that will be charged with, among other things, [violently?] suppressing internal revolt, ie. pro-democracy demonstrations of the type we’ve seen in Egypt.

~While the news of the Libyan rebels’ advance into Tripoli has been lauded by U.S. government officials, reports of a very dark side of this ongoing battle are coming to light including the rebel’s use of reprisal killings, torture etc.

~Add Patrick Kennedy to the list of politicians and former U.S. officials getting paid big bucks to advocate for a foreign terrorist organization, the Mujahedin-e-Khalqthat (MEK), they seem to know little to nothing about. The fact that the MEK has almost zero support in Iran, particularly among the Green Movement, apparently doesn’t matter.

~Apparently deficit spending doesn’t matter when it’s a multi-billion dollar defense program that is way over budget. It seemed that the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter was finally going to die a long-deserved death because of cost overruns, poor performance and the fact that we probably don’t even need it but NOPE, the GOP is trying to bring it back from the dead.

~Robert Reich is right, this Labor Day we should protest, not just have parades.

~David Sirota has a great piece in the Washington Post about how the Pentagon is turning to Hollywood to make war look Top Gun cool. Your tax dollars at work.

~Oh my God, mark your calendars- the Washington Post ombudsman Patrick Pexton actually found something the Washington Post did wrong. Usually he just gets defensive and blames the readers for their partisanship.

~The number of attacks perpetrated by suicide bombers is on the rise in Afghanistan.

~Here in the U.S. we can really take anything and turn a profit- Islamophobia is big business.

~Gawker vs. Fox News. Fox is falling right into their trap.

~The Martin Luther King statue was completed using unpaid Chinese laborers. Brilliant, really.

~I guess after the 2008 election, candidate’s church attendance, views etc. will be put under the microscope. Bachmann’s church, unsurprisingly, discriminates. Churches, other private religious groups are allowed to do that by the way.

~Do Egypt and Israel need to amend their peace treaty to allow more troops in the Sinai?

~Michele Bachmann thinks those “radical environmentalists” are to blame for our energy problems. Right.

The End. Stay Safe.

Read full story · Comments { 5 }

Hurricane IRENE… The Rain has Arrived

**UPDATED BELOW**

SUNDAY, 10:25 a.m.: We still don’t have power, but the 2-star general on the street behind us does. Mark was able to run extensions to get the frigerator turned on, because our generator didn’t turn over. Also got my dead phone charged, which is why I can write this update. Huge tree uprooted & crashed across the next street over. Clean up began with putting our deck canopy back up… More later…

Irene’s got a middle iname, and it’s Global Warming.environmental activist Bill McKibben

The area to the left of this big tree has a deep trench to move the cascading water that comes down from the yards above us. It's a work in progress, but it's great fun to sculpt. Now Irene has passed through and our trees made it, though one street over a huge tree was completely uprooted.

Irene’s wide spread is already being seen as rain hits New York, as well as the Beltway, where I live. We’re not supposed to get the heaviest rains until late tonight, early Sunday.

Daniel, aka “Dash of Dan,” said in a tweet exchange with me that he’s a-okay, though New Yorkers are expecting power loss later.

Thoughts go out to everyone today, especially those getting hit hardest. Stay safe.

Downgraded a notch to a Category 1 storm, Hurricane Irene made landfall on the Outer Banks of North Carolina just after dawn Saturday, with its leading edge already delivering gusting winds and showers to the Washington area and beaches from Virginia north to Delaware.

The brunt of the storm was moving north from Cape Hatteras and was expected to arrive in the Washington area late Saturday and into Sunday morning before heading toward New York and New England.

Pres. Obama has declared states disaster areas along the eastern seaboard, up into New England.

Wonder what Republicans like Gov. Chris Christie would do if the federal government wasn’t there to assist his state and help with funding what needs to be repaired afterward? Government matters and no feckless Democrat or Republican afraid to say so is worthy of holding office.

Oh, and as for Sean Hannity announcing yesterday that First Lady Michele Obama would stay behind in Martha’s Vineyard with her entourage. I’m sure his listening audience will hear a retraction from him on Monday, right? Having delivered it in the worst upper crust, faux British accent you’ve ever heard from a multi-millionaire, it’s the least he could do. But since the man has no class, he won’t. You’ve really got to wonder why the right-wing hates Mrs. Obama with such gusto, but considering they hated Hillary Clinton even more, I see a pattern. It’s any woman who isn’t subservient.

Would enjoy hearing your stories, what your hearing about the storm. So, chime in and share. It’s one hell of a way to end August.

Update: Just posted on Twitter an image of nifty head flashlight Mark used to fix radio, as we listen to Prairie Home Companion on NPR, which is all about St Louis, where I grew up. Walked to gage energy earlier after we lost power; xtra lrg umbrella held for a while, then had to collapse it & tighten my hood, as wind turned from raucous to riotous. …guess since power’s off we’ll have to pop the Duret. Weather olympics outside, but no danger (via BlackBerry).

Read full story · Comments { 21 }

Progressive Notes: Trumka’s Plan, Roseanne, Black Caucus Grabs WH Attention, and Other Doings

Art offers his perspective as a movement progressive activist.

The TV series, Roseanne, is seeing a surge in popularity again because the show talked alot about blue collar America. Here is a classic clip making the YouTube hits list. When a state house candidate shows up at her door to talk about tax breaks:

Must see TV. Trumka on Countdown about his plan for labor. Key word “accountability” for our pols:

Richard Trumka in Huffington Post on AFL-CIO’s new strategy: focus on the local level and build a progressive infrastructure. Trumka has some harsh words:

“I think the President made a strategic mistake when he abandoned talking about the jobs crisis and job creation and focused completely on the politically manufactured debt crisis,” he said when asked for a review of the administration’s economic record. “You have one very obvious way to make a dent in the deficit crisis, which is to get people back to work.”

But you don’t have anyone actually talking about jobs,” Trumka said. “And when you bring it up to people at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, their almost universal response is we have a Congress that won’t do it. So what do you do? You do what leaders do, you lead.”

On strategy:

“What we are now focused on is doing a couple of things differently,” Trumka said. “In the past, we would build our structure six to eight months before the election,” he added. “Now we’re not going to do that. We’re going to focus our resources on building a structure that has total fidelity towards America’s working people, both union and non-union working people. We’ll do it 12 months a year, so they’ll be able to transition from electoral politics, to advocacy, to accountability with no effort. And it will continue to build greater strength for workers after the election and in between elections.”

I told you folks like Reps. Waters and Conyers will make headlines until they are heard. It appears the WH is starting to hear them and is considering executive reallocation of funds to help the black community. Why? This scene in Miami at the CBC jobs fair has got the Obama Whitehouse’s attention:

At the Miami church Monday, Waters and other lawmakers expressed frustration about what they said was a reluctance by the first black president and his aides to speak directly about the pain African Americans are feeling.

When Graves said that “certain communities have been hit harder than other communities,” Waters cut him off.

“Let me hear you say ‘black,’ ” she said sternly. As the crowd cheered, Graves responded quietly: “Black, African American, Latino, these communities have been hard hit.”

Bishop Victor Curry, head of the Miami-Dade NAACP, drew thunderous applause when he described black economic struggles in the age of Obama as the “300-pound elephant in the room.”

“We don’t want to come across as being critical of the president,” Curry said. “But if the president can count on 90 percent of the African American vote, then the African American community should expect something from the man who’s getting 90 percent of their support.”

And what else has the WH worried? The GOP and dirty tricks:

..Republicans have begun pointing to the economic strain on blacks, maybe hoping to dampen voter excitement about Obama next year. Campaign staff members for GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney, for instance, attended the Congressional Black Caucus’s jobs fair Tuesday in Miami, seeking to interview people who are unemployed. And former House speaker Newt Gingrich (Ga.), appearing Wednesday with Fox News host Sean Hannity, lamented the “level of personal pain, family pain” associated with black unemployment and noted that “virtually every African American church in this country has members who are now unemployed.”

For years the black vote was taken for granted by Obama. Now unemployment and a newfound outspoken set of black voices in the community may force the post-racial Obama to do more for Black America.

Kudos to the Obama administration for at least highlighting to the press and the public how outrageous it has been for the GOP to block so many judicial nominations. 97 out 155 of Obama’s nominees have been confirmed. That is only 62 percent. Obama has nominated more women and minorities than any other president in American history. More of this please from the Whitehouse.

Town hall mayhem continues! This time Rep. Gibson (R-Ny) gets taken on by a small businessman on why he won’t vote to raise any taxes. And Norquist’s pledge as well:

How serious is Elizabeth Warren’s senate campaign for progressives? Huge:

If the Harvard Law School professor who became the chief advocate for real banking reform and the development of a federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau runs and defeats U.S. Scott Brown, R-Massachusetts [2], she will instantly become an essential spokesperson for progressive values in national economic, regulatory and fiscal policy debates.

Put Warren next to stalwarts like Oregon Democrat Jeff Merkley, Minnesota Democrat Al Franken, Iowa Democrat Tom Harkin, California Democrat Barbara Boxer, a reelected Vermont Independent Bernie Sanders, a reelected Ohio Democrat Sherrod Brown, as well as progressive newcomers like Wisconsin Democrat Tammy Baldwin, and Hawaiian Democrat Mazie Hirono, both expected candidates open Senate seats, and you’ve got the makings of what Paul Wellstone [3] always wanted: a Senate Progressive Caucus. [4]

Warren’s:

… ability to grab the spotlight and use it to push the discourse to the left on economic issues that the media so frequently neglects makes the prospect of her candidacy and Senate service potentially transformative for movements and a party that will — no matter what the 2012 presidential election result — begin pondering sometime next year the challenge of identifying leaders of the post-Obama era.

Progressives know Warren’s value. That is why National Nurses United, a powerful player these days, has already backed Warren.

A new book is out on the American Left and why it has not been as powerful as in the Left in Europe. Michael Kazan’s work has some interesting thoughts namely that in the 1930s America was primed for the New Deal because of the Gilded Age and the progressive movement. And in Europe the Left has wild success due to how powerful class lines are there and thus how parties are aligned.

Kazan sees the American Left as most effective on the civil rights front for minorities and women. If the Left here wants to impact economic policy more it must build institutions like the Right did to train, educate and organize generations. This is what labor now is trying to do.

In the good news front progressives are successfully working in states to have the public vote on laws passed by the Tea Party. The hope is to get these laws abolished. We know this November Ohio voters will vote on killing Governor Kaisch’s SB5 which nixed collective bargaining. In Idaho voters likely will have the chance to nix Governor Otter’s restrictions on union rights. In Maine the voters may well get the chance to reverse a newly passed bill which ends 38 years of same day voter registration. More here.

Read full story · Comments { 6 }

Queer Talk: “The Militant Homosexual”

On August 23, 1971, Newsweek ran a story with this headline: “The Militant Homosexual.”

Jim Burroway, at Box Turtle Bulletin, has a regular “Today in History” column. That’s LGBT related history, and it’s one of my daily “must reads.” On Tuesday, he provided an overview of that Newsweek article, printed about two years after the June, 1969 Stonewall Rebellion, writing

already that landmark uprising (had) sparked a new burst of gay advocacy which went beyond anything that had gone before. Straight America was scratching its collective head: where did all of these homosexuals come from?

In a four page spread, Newsweek reported:

Within weeks (of Stonewall), the first of scores of militant homosexual groups, the Gay Liberation Front, was formed in New York. The new mood quickly crossed the continent, leading to the creation of similar organizations in Los Angeles and San Francisco. By the first anniversary of the Stonewall incident, the militants were on the march in a dozen cities. By the second anniversary, they were celebrating Gay Pride Week … . The movement already has a book-length history in print and some of its more imaginative propagandists have even begun to speak of a ‘Stonewall Nation’.

Note the descriptive words, like “propagandists” and “militants.” Burroway writes:

As one measure of the surprise this new openness must have engendered, the word ‘militant’ appeared in the four-page article fifteen times. And what the authors regarded ‘militant’ is revealing: they described ‘militants’ coming out to their friends, families and employers; ‘militants’ wanting acceptance; ‘militants’ refusing to accept the APA’s verdict that they were mentally ill (the APA would set aside that verdict two years later); ‘militants’ demanding an end to the ban on federal employment; ‘militants’ starting gay churches and ‘militants’ getting married in them, and ‘militants’ saying it’s great to be gay.

And daring to say that being gay was a good thing was, as Burroway notes, seen by Newsweek as “especially dangerous.” From the Newsweek article:

What all this suggests is a central problem that gay liberation usually chooses to ignore: if the movement succeeds in creating an image of ‘normality’ for homosexuals in the society at large, would it encourage more homosexually inclined people — particularly young people — to follow their urges without hesitation? No one really knows for certain. Dr. Paul Gebhard, the distinguished anthropologist who directs the Kinsey Institute for Sex Research at Indiana University, believes that gay lib ‘will not convert heterosexuals into homosexuals but might encourage those who are going in a homosexual direction to feel less guilty about it.’

Get it? It’s a bad thing for the homosexuals to feel “less guilty.” The article continues

New York sociologist Edward Sagarin takes an even dimmer view. ‘If the militants didn’t say that it is great to be gay,’ Sagarin insists, ‘more adolescents with homosexual tendencies might seek to change instead of resolving their confusion by accepting the immediate warm security that tells them they are normal.’

In some ways the Newsweek story sounds almost quaint, a period of LGBT history that’s foreign to younger generations. But even as polls consistently show a growing support for LGBT equality, there are still people whose views about homosexuality sound very 1971-ish. We’re transitioning, and you can see it in major and multiple ways. However, I don’t think that means we can ignore the still significant anti-LGBT views. It may be tempting to shrug them off, even laugh. But we need to be careful not to minimize the damage that’s still being done. And the work still to be done.

On Wednesday Paul Thornton, in the LA Times, wrote 2012 campaign: Rick Perry and a uniquely anti-gay GOP field?

Could this be the biggest gay-bashing election in recent history? Doubtful, since President George W. Bush set such a high bar in 2004. Quite the contrary: Call me an optimist, but I see such highly publicized gay-baiting as a positive development.

Why? Not so long ago, the virulently homophobic views offered by some candidates were treated almost as viable alternatives to the positions taken by less anti-gay politicians. It was as if all those views came from the same menu of Reasonable Points of View Worth Debating. Now, the radical ideas espoused by Bachmann, Perry, Santorum and others are held up not for genuine consideration but for scorn (notwithstanding the last GOP debate in Iowa).

I think Thornton has a legitimate point, but I also think it’s a mistake to discount the results the widely “scorned” views still have in the lives of LGBTs. In significant ways, Perry comparing homosexuality to alcoholism in his 2008 book, On My Honor, sounds silly. But such words contribute to a still present attitude that sees lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons as “acceptable” targets of judgment. Igor Volsky, at Think Progress writes:

Perry went on to say that he was ‘tolerant toward those who have a different sexual preference,’ but condemned ‘the agenda of radical gay rights groups that want to throw their sexual activity into the face of society … .’

Sort of sounds as if it could be have written in, say, 1971, doesn’t it?

One example of where such thinking continues to have an influence is seen in a Keene News Service piece by Dana Rudolph, LGBT students: Safer this year?:

Anti-LGBT bullying took the national stage last fall after the highly publicized suicides of several teens bullied for being gay or perceived to be. The relentless bullying, many believe, may have been one of the contributing factors in their decisions to attempt suicide, and their deaths led to an surge of anti-bullying awareness campaigns and media coverage.

But will LGBT students entering school this fall be any safer after a year of heightened awareness about the issue?

Eliza Byard, executive director of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), and David McFarland, interim executive director/CEO of The Trevor Project, the leading national organization providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services to LGBT (and questioning) youth, both acknowledged progress has been made, but both also express concerns about what McFarland calls the “continuing … anti-LGBT rhetoric and movement across this country that has a negative effect on young people… . There is greater awareness around this issue, but LGBT students still experience bullying and harassment at an alarming rate.”

The time for militant activism isn’t just history. It’s current reality.

( Photo via BoxTurtleBulletin )

Read full story · Comments { 4 }

Herb Buttermilk Biscuits

Just this past week Taylor brought to my attention this story.

Over the past few years I’ve seen a real push for locally grown produce, and Alice Waters who is featured in the article above, has been a pioneer for sustainable, locally grown produce for 40 years.

Today we live in a world where fruits and vegetables come to our dinner tables shipped to us from across the globe,  while convenient we miss out on fair prices, support for local farmers, and the ability to teach our children about the wonderment of growing what you eat.

This all made me think back to my childhood, and the person who first introduced me to growing and gardening, my sister.

Lisa has a garden the size of a small hallway and space here in the city is limited, but that never stopped her. Corn, eggplants, tomatoes, and a host of plants to attract butterflies and bees fill the backyard space. My sister taught me at a young age the power of getting your hands dirty and reaping the rewards. Fast forward to today, I do my own gardening on a fire escape.

So staying true to Alice Waters pioneering philosophy and to my inspiration, my sister, here’s a recipe the utilizes locally grown herbs in a buttery and flaky buttermilk biscuit.

 

 

Recipe:

4 cups all purpose flour, plus more for dusting           2 teaspoons minced fresh sage

1 tablespoon, plus 1 teaspoon baking powder              1 teaspoon sugar

1 teaspoon baking soda                                                          1 3/4 cups buttermilk

1 teaspoon salt

2 sticks unsalted butter, chilled and cubed

 

Topping: 

4 tablespoons butter

1 teaspoons minced fresh rosemary

1 teaspoon minced fresh thyme

(optional: sea salt)

On the stove melt 4 tablespoons butter with the rosemary and thyme, until fragrant. Set aside.

 

* Preheat oven to 375 degrees *Makes 1 dozen biscuits (varies with the size of the cutter you use)

  1. In a large bowl whisk together the flour, baking powder, baking soda, salt, and sugar. Sprinkle chilled/cubed butter over top and using a pastry blender cut the butter into the flour mixture until it resembles coarse crumbs. Add minced fresh sage.
  2. Pour in the buttermilk, using a rubber spatula fold into buttermilk into the dough. (A bottom up motion works best to get those crumbs at the bottom of the bowl.) It should just come together and the dough might be slightly sticky but don’t worry, the last thing you want to do it overmix!
  3. Turn the dough onto a lightly floured surface, with floured hands gently pat the dough to about 1-inch thickness. With a 2 1/4-inch round biscuit cutter, cut out the biscuits as close together as possible.
  4. Place the biscuits on an unlined baking sheet, brush the tops of the biscuits with the herb butter topping. Sprinkle with sea salt, if desired.
  5. Bake the biscuits for 18-20 minutes, biscuits will be golden and flecked with brown spots. Serve warm or at room temperature.

 

Do you grow your own herbs, veggies or fruits? Have any favorite places to get local produce?

This is an open thread, so feel free to share with me!

P.S. Also, a shout-out to Michelle Obama, who among ten recipients (including Alice Waters) is receiving the James Beard Leadership Award, for championing healthy and sustainable food!

Read full story · Comments { 10 }

Most Common Word Linked with Perry: ‘Problem’

We’ve got Paul Krugman’s “Bernanke’s Perry Problem.”

Why don’t I expect much from Mr. Bernanke? In two words: Rick Perry.

O.K., I don’t mean that Mr. Perry, the governor of Texas, is personally standing in the way of effective monetary policy. Not yet, anyway. Instead, I’m using Mr. Perry — who has famously threatened Mr. Bernanke with dire personal consequences if he pursues expansionary monetary policy before the 2012 election — as a symbol of the political intimidation that is killing our last remaining hope for economic recovery.

I’m not buying Mr. Krugman’s “intimidation” argument here, because I don’t think Bernanke’s paying any attention to Mr. Perry, because he’s not stupid.

The Wall Street Journal‘s got “Perry’s Popping Off Problem.” It’s fairly predictable for Peggy Noonan, who is not likely to be part of the Perry pack.

His primary flaw appears to be a chesty, quick-draw machismo that might be right for an angry base but wrong for an antsy country. Americans want a president who feels their anger without himself walking around enraged.

But then there is Jonah Goldberg’s “My Rick Perry Problem–and Ours,” which is at the foundation of what I believe will be Perry’s impediment to win the general election.

… But here’s my problem: I find the prospect of another four or eight years of defending these cultural distinctions to be intensely wearying.

My weariness is hardly a major consideration for anybody, but I think it reflects a larger problem. Conservatism is starting to have an identity-politics problem all its own. I think conservatism needs to spend less time defending candidates for who they are, and more time supporting candidates for what they intend to do.

Bush’s inability to articulate arguments had nothing to do with his Texan-ness or his Christianity, but a lot of folks on the right defended him as if that were the case. “He speaks American, don’t you get it?”

To which I’d reply: “No, he speaks badly.”

Perry’s not a bad speaker, and I’m trying to keep an open mind. I suspect I agree with him more than I did with Bush, whose compassionate conservatism I loathed.

Nor do I mind folksiness per se. Mississippi governor Haley Barbour can talk seriously and colorfully at the same time. But this time around, folksiness isn’t a substitute for seriousness, and I have very little patience for those who pretend otherwise.

Seriousness, indeed. Perry’s not got Palin’s gravitas problem, but there will always be a problem with letting Perry be Perry.

One interesting note is that he’s reportedly talking with Donald Trump. But guess what, so is Mitt Romney.

Trump, who announced he would not pursue the Republican nomination a few months ago, continues to hold open the possibility of running as an independent candidate in the general election if he does not like who the GOP nominates. Indeed, his team has explored how to get him on the ballot in all 50 states.

A Trump endorsement – or at least Trump’s acquiescence to who the Republicans nominate – could be significant. Public Policy Polling released national data yesterday afternoon about the potency of Trump in a three-way matchup against President Obama and a Republican. “Even though his birther shenanigans trashed his name with most voters, he would still pull 18% to Romney’s 30% and Obama’s 46%, meaning Romney would finish closer to third than first,” said Democratic pollster Dustin Ingalls.

Trump in the place of kingmaker? With economics the storyline, could be. If you don’t understand it, go back to David Brooks’s “Why Trump Soars.” You’ll get it.

Unlike Trump, Sarah Palin has lost her power, missed her window and ruined her prowess with stunts that don’t amount to much at a time when Republicans see hope for 2012 and know she can’t deliver the White House.

It’s way too soon to tell if Rick Perry can, but he’s certainly excited primary voters and Tea Party people, who still feel they’re in an arranged marriage with Mitt, as one Florida GOP strategist put it recently.

Right now Perry’s running on Texas myth fumes and Republican desperation for a brawl. His day of reckoning comes Sept. 7th at the Reagan Library when he’ll be in his first big debate and his opponents come gunnin’ for him.

Read full story · Comments { 2 }

Progressive Notes: AP Poll Should Give Another Round of Heartburn

Art offers his perspective as a movement progressive activist.

Major polling news breaks. This time from the AP, and it’s full of troubling numbers. Most crucial is that views on the economy have soured markedly, especially since the debt deal. Worse, Obama’s polling fall comes mostly from Democrats who have lost faith in the president.

Of note:

-86 pct now say the economy is poor, up from 80 percent a few months ago.
-49 percent say the economy worsened this summer.
-51 percent blame Bush, not Obama for the economic situation.

The fact a majority still blame Bush is probably the best number for Obama in the poll.

A plurality of 44 percent blame the GOP in Congress, while 36 percent blame the Democrats. These numbers should give hope that the GOP has so badly enraged the public it keeps the Dems in the game and gives them a shot at taking back the House.

So a few glimmers of hope for Obama re-elect yes. But some real alarming numbers come from the Democratic base:

More than 6 in 10 — 63 percent — disapprove of Obama’s handling of the economy. Nearly half, or 48 percent, “strongly” disapproved. Approval of his economic performance now stands at just 36 percent, his worst approval rating on the issue in AP-GfK polling.

Among Democrats, 58 percent approve of the president’s handling of the economy, down from 65 percent in June.

Fifty one percent of Americans now say Obama is a strong leader, a large dip from June when 65 percent said he was strong. Where did the dip come from? Partly his party:

In June, 85 percent of Democrats in the poll called him a strong leader. Now, the number is down to 76 percent.

Obama also suffers from a Bush-like sense of the nation is on the wrong track, by a whopping 75 percent and again it’s Democrats losing faith causing trouble. In June 46 percent of Dems said “wrong track.” Now it is 61 percent. A huge jump.

Another cause for heartburn is this:

In a new high, 52 percent of all adults said they disapprove of his overall performance — 52 percent, up from 47 percent in June. Among Democrats, approval fell 8 points, to 74 percent from 82 percent in June.

One other wrinkle: the Dems have so botched their message on job creation the GOP is now seen as just as likely to create jobs! 44 percent say the Dems are better at jobs, 44 percent think the GOP can be.

AP found that a record has been shattered in the history of their poll: a record number of Americans despise the Congress with only 12 percent approving! See other interesting stats from Huffington post here.

Yet Obama remains alive despite all these numbers because of the alternative. In this environment Obama will need about 90 percent of his base to back him in order to win. Bush Jr. had 92 percent of his base behind him in 2004. Kerry had 88 percent. So: Obama is swimming against the current and this is not 2008. This is 2004. I suppose Obama should be grateful this is not 1979 in the polling data, at least thus far.

Read full story · Comments { 10 }

Two Parties = Too Few Choices, Part V

Joyce L. Arnold: Liberal, lesbian, Independent, equality activist, writer.

“Ask not how evil we are. Ask how evil the other party is!” Vastleft

That “Kennedyeseque” (as Vastleft terms it) phrase sums things up, in terms of what the Two Party Front for the Oligarchy likes to see happening. It’s, “Look! Over there! Scary Barack Obama!” Or, “Look! Over there! Scary Rick Perry!” Or Bachmann, or whoever. Fear is a key tactic in maintaining the Duopoly. As I’m working to point out through this “Two Parties” series, there are multiple efforts challenging the two party system, from within and without, from the philosophical to protests.

BlueLyon asked in a recent blog post, “How Do You Know? Or, Critical Thinking is Hard.

The problem isn’t that we aren’t in the street, or that the Tea Party is. The problem isn’t merely with the people we’ve put into office. The problem is that too few of us engage in critical thinking … . We don’t examine the candidates who stand before us … .

Being “in the streets” is an important piece of holding Electeds accountable. So is asking “How do I know?”, how do I arrive at my conclusions. Reading through material at the links I’ve provided (at the end), it’s clear a great deal of thought and action are going into how our monetarily entrenched system can be challenged.

A single issue focus probably won’t “grow” a party, but it can be a part of the process toward political change. Right now, in DC, a small group of people is using a vintage protest action, the sit-in. I think the discussions and analyses regarding our election and political system are crucial. So are actions. And sometimes I think the “action” part gets lost in all the words.

At Huffington Post, “TransCanada Pipeline Protesters: Who They Are, Why They Came”:

The debate over the Keystone XL oil pipeline reached a fever pitch this week as activists led by author and environmentalist Bill McKibben called on Barack Obama to deny presidential approval to the TransCanada project, which would stretch from tar sands in Canada to oil refineries in south Texas. Tuesday marked the fifth day of protests as well as the arrival of dozens of Gulf Coast residents to sit-ins before the White House.

The protests, slated to run through Sept. 3, have drawn a geographically diverse group of activists from as far away as California and Montana. As of Wednesday morning, 275 had been arrested by the U.S. Park Police. Hundreds more are on their way to Washington.

Now, “hundreds” isn’t the kind of thing that usually gets much media, or political, attention. A part of the political reform and create process is making ways for people like those protesting to be heard, in spite of ties between the MSM, the DC Elite, and the corporations who pay most of them.

‘Our Gulf Coast is very fragile … . We can’t go back and repair it … once they destroy it,’ said Paul Nelson, a commercial fisherman from Alabama. …

Other activists came to Washington to protest what they describe as the devastating health effects of oil refining and processing in Gulf Coast communities. … Bryan Parras, co-founder of Texas Environmental Justice Advocacy Services (said) … ‘there was a study done that said if you live within two miles of the Houston ship channel, … you have a 50 percent higher chance of contracting childhood leukemia.’ …

According to event organizers, over 2000 people signed up to be a part of the protest, and while media attention is obviously helpful,

Protesters … are more concerned about getting the attention of the White House.

‘TransCanada … need(s) a presidential permit to build that pipeline across our border,’ Mike Tidwell, founder of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, told a crowd of protesters gathered at the White House on Monday, ‘and President Obama has the ability to say yes or no.’ …

Along with Bill McKibben, one of those arrested was Jane Hamsher. Check out the series of posts Hamsher has written. This is from August 22, ”Did Obama Order Tar Sands Protesters Jailed?”:

In negotiations with the police prior to the action that began on Saturday, the police were very clear that what would happen after people were arrested was the vast majority would get what’s called ‘post and forfeit,’ where you put up $100, get released from jail after several hours, and you don’t have to come back again. …

… Instead, after arresting the first day’s 70 people, they (police) decided to hold most of them, all those not from within a 25-mile radius of Washington, D.C., in jail until a Monday afternoon arraignment. …

Why did they do this? … Four separate police officers told organizers that it was explicitly to discourage other people from taking part in actions going forward.

One other example of how people are acting on their words. Via Alternet ”Nurses Union Calls for Nationwide Action September 1 to Rebuild Main Street”: (emphasis mine)

Main Street is where the damage has been done and is being felt most deeply; DC is where deals are cut to protect Wall Street with breath-taking regularity. …

So, on Thursday, September 1, the nurses of National Nurses United will gather in more than 60 communities from Maine to Texas, and Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Michigan, Florida, Illinois, California and beyond to call on the nation’s elected officials to chose to protect and repair Main Street and stop cow-towing to Wall Street. …

The Wall Street Transaction Tax is a sales tax on the stocks, bonds, debt and other trades carried out by the financial industry. That’s the place to start. …

Find an event near you, ask your elected officials to attend and insist that they pledge to be a part of healing Main Street, and then stay tuned as the nurses keep up the kind of pressure needed to hold those who pledge to keep their promises and those who do not to stand to account.

Just two examples of the kind of actions being taken, and of the people who take them, people who defy the “nobody is doing anything” and “you have no choice” judgments. Like critical thinking, actions are hard work. And take time.

Below are links to earlier posts in this series. The last one includes a complete list, to date, of the political and party reform efforts I’ve found. More to come. And I want to keep hearing from you. Among other things, what’s going on in your state, and, are you seeing coalitions developing?

Posts in this series:
Grading the Electoral College
Two Parties = Too Few Choices
Two Parties = Too Few Choices, Part II
Two Parties = Too Few Choices, Part III
Two Parties = Too Few Choices, Part IV

(Photo via WatchingFrogsBoil)

Read full story · Comments { 14 }

Trumka to Dems: You’re on Your Own

Labor “ditching” Democrats to concentrate on building a stronger labor movement as 2012 begins to heat up plays into why the above ad from Democracy for America, that’s supposed to air across the country, looks and sounds so tone deaf to me. Blaming only Republicans for what’s going on misses the problem by a mile. One of the biggest challenges for labor and movement progressives has been the Democratic establishment, starting with Pres. Obama and his Administration.

Where was Pres. Obama during the Wisconsin fight? He was silent. Right now labor and the middle class need a champion and they don’t have one.

A Bloomberg article about the “workingman’s” plight gives an important backdrop to Trumka’s Democratic discontent.

That labor has finally gotten tired of the word salad promises from Pres. Obama that isn’t backed by action doesn’t surprise me. Yes, Republicans are worse, but when a Democratic Administration has proven itself to be weak on building up the middle and working classes, the lesser of two evils argument just isn’t good enough.

From Politico:

Going forward, Trumka said, the labor movement will build up its own political structures and organizations rather than contribute to and depend on the Democratic Party’s political operation.

“We’re going to use a lot of our money to build structures that work for working people” Trumka said. “You’re going to see us give less money to build structures for others, and more of our money will be used to build our own structure.”

Trumka’s remarks follow the news that the AFL-CIO will set up a so-called super PAC, allowing the nation’s largest labor federation to spend unlimited amounts of money on political activity for next year’s elections and beyond. Trumka confirmed Thursday that the union is moving forward with plans to create the PAC.

It’s long past time that Democratic supporters wake up and send a message to the current crop of political pansies. If they aren’t going to support what’s important to build a stronger middle class then they’re not part of the solution anymore, they’re the problem.

Evidently, Trumka has finally found his inner tea party gene. More Democrats and progressives need to find theirs, too.

Read full story · Comments { 13 }

Hurricane Irene: Four Governors Declare Disaster in Preparation

From CNN:

Four governors declared states of emergency Thursday as Hurricane Irene threatened to wreak havoc along the United States’ Eastern Seaboard.

Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley declared emergencies for their states, while North Carolina Gov. Beverly Perdue declared a state of emergency in counties east of Interstate 95. The emergency declarations allow states to free funds and prepare resources that may be needed.

The Washington Post has a terrific tracker page.

It will likely be a tropical storm by the time it hits where we live.

Read full story · Comments { 1 }

Perry’s Red Hot and Laura Ingraham Got Him

“I think Mitt is finally recognizing that the Massachusetts healthcare plan that he passed is a huge problem for him, and yeah it was not almost perfect,” Perry said on the Laura Ingraham Show Thursday. – Rick Perry Calls Mass. Healthcare Plan a “Huge Problem” for Mitt Romney

Nate Silver provides the analysis that dismantles slick Mitt’s best laid plans.

It was quite an impressive booking for Ingraham. It’s not every day that the chick gets the biggest gun first on wingnut radio.

Maybe somebody on Rick Perry’s team knew it was “Women’s Equality Day.” nah… That’s not something on the Republicans’ radar.

But Perry’s surge is real, because the fragile frontrunner is not beloved by anyone, but also because the heat Perry brings is exactly the kind of battle the GOP is looking for in 2012.

Republican primary voters don’t want a policy debate, they want a brawl with Obama and Rick Perry can provide it, even if the President ends up the last man standing.

Read full story · Comments { 6 }

Obama, Jobs and Economic Uncertainty

President Barack Obama receives an economic briefing from Brian Deese, Deputy Director of the National Economic Council, in Chilmark, Mass., August 24, 2011. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

From Reuters:

The president is widely expected to repeat his calls for an extension of a payroll tax cut, push for patent reform and bilateral free trade deals, and suggest an infrastructure bank to upgrade the country’s roads, airports and other facilities.

Retrofitting schools with energy efficient technology would allow the government to directly hire for labor-intensive work and also give a boost to the clean energy sector that Obama has said could be an important U.S. economic motor.

Other measures being considered, according to economists who have advised the White House, include tax credits for firms hiring more workers, funds for local governments to hire teachers, and retraining help for the long-term unemployed. Steps to boost the ailing housing market are also under review.

Complicating the fall outlook, however, is an article circulating from the UK Telegraph with a heart-stopping headline that could change everything:

Read full story · Comments { 10 }

Back to the Future

We’re doomed.

From David Limbaugh, via Politico.

p.s.: The problem with this picture and why I wrote “we’re doomed” has nothing to do with Obama’s reelection or whether Perry could win (which I still don’t believe, unless his running mate is someone groundbreaking, aka Rubio). It’s because if this is where the argument for 2012 is held it dooms this country to a pitifully small narrative based on nothing real amidst challenges we face that won’t be addressed.

Read full story · Comments { 16 }

Rick Perry Now, Marco Rubio Tomorrow?

**UPDATED**

Dumbed down, God-invoking, gun-slinging, constitution cutting, anti women, retro Republican Rick Perry is causing Mitt Romney severe distress. He’s not doing much for Democrats and progressives either.

But what sets Perry apart and earns him his niche in the far right corner of Mount Rushmore has nothing to do with the gyrations of the 2012 campaign. Indeed, Perry is not only a presidential candidate, but also a cowboy-booted sociological experiment. It is almost as if Perry’s political persona was constructed by bundling together all the fears and phantoms in the left-wing anxiety closet. Since the hysteria of the 1950s Red Scare, no Republican figure has matched Perry in his God-given ability to give liberals the heebie-jeebies. Others can rival the governor’s disdain for academic achievement (Palin), his cross-on-the-sleeve religiosity (Michele Bachmann and Mike Huckabee), and his antipathy to Social Security and Medicare (Paul Ryan and Barry Goldwater). But never before has a top-tier presidential candidate embodied the whole lethal package—and more… – Rick Perry: The God-Fearing, Know-Nothing, Pistol-Packing Embodiment of Liberals’ Worst Nightmares, by Walter Shapiro

Nobody’s convinced me yet that Mr. Perry, who is the right-wing primary voters’ dream candidate, can beat Pres. Obama, but I’m still listening. In the current field, Mitt Romney’s remains the best bet, but just maybe Republicans are too ideologically off the cliff to pay attention to what general election voters will buy. Does anyone believe Perry can pass the wider American voter’s smell test?

Perry also has the distinction, if you ask me, of being the last gasp of this type of candidate, because looking forward another Republican is emerging.

Marco Rubio. But why?

What does Rubio want to do? Nothing very specific, insofar as I can tell. He’s young, so there’s time yet for him to do better. But evaluating him based on this speech, I don’t see what all the fuss is about. – Is Marco Rubio the Future of the Republican Party?

If Sen. Rubio wasn’t Hispanic would we be talking about him?

You could ask the same question of the GOP women Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin, with pasty white men no longer the only game in America, though in the Republican Party women are still second class to any male, no matter the ethnic distinction.

And let’s remember, if it weren’t for the Hillary effect, Sarah Palin would never have left Alaska.

However, for Mr. Rubio and the Republican Party, being Hispanic matters, because Republicans have an abysmal record on minorities, something this young politician could change in one run for president, which is where his sights are set.

But what if Romney or Perry would ask Sen. Rubio to run as vice president? It seems clear that’s not where he wants to be, but if called to serve in a year where Pres. Obama is beatable can he afford to refuse? Bad political blood rarely goes away. Just ask Mitt Romney.

UPDATE: Let me just add that the reason I’ve paired Rubio in this post with two contenders is that he makes the GOP ticket a lot more palatable, especially if Republicans go Tea Party crazy and nominate Perry. I don’t see a way for Perry to win the general at this point, though Rubio on the ticket would go a long way to helping Perry make him plausibly viable.

Read full story · Comments { 27 }

Can New Hampshire Save America?

Many say 2012 could be another 1964, with Republicans nominating a crazy person like Perry, but I’m not so sure. Of course, if Sarah Palin gets in, which I still doubt (she’s got her big fat contract with Fox), that’s exactly what it will turn out to be. With the issues facing our country so desperately serious, imagining Perry or Palin competing for the presidency against Pres. Obama makes me nauseous, because Palin just might be a better choice than Perry and even contemplating that thought sends me to the smelling salts.

This dynamic is just one reason Jon Huntsman’s interview with ABC’s Jake Tapper hit Republicans like a jolt of electricity. Paul Gigot had a hissy fit, because what Huntsman said not only hit a raw nerve, but has the virtue of being true.

TAPPER: You were one of the only, if not the only Republican candidate, to support the deal to raise the debt ceiling. You called Congresswoman Bachmann’s position a, quote, “crash and burn” approach. Would you trust a President Bachmann to do the right thing with the economy?

HUNTSMAN: Well, I wouldn’t necessarily trust any of my opponents right now, who were on a recent debate stage with me, when every single one of them would have allowed this country to default. [...]

Huntsman also said:

The minute that the Republican Party becomes the party – the anti-science party, we have a huge problem. We lose a whole lot of people who would otherwise allow us to win the election in 2012. When we take a position that isn’t willing to embrace evolution, when we take a position that basically runs counter to what 98 of 100 climate scientists have said, what the National Academy of Science – Sciences has said about what is causing climate change and man’s contribution to it, I think we find ourselves on the wrong side of science, and, therefore, in a losing position.

Perry is now leading in Iowa.

The race is pretty close four ways in Iowa but Rick Perry is the new favorite among Republican voters in the state. Among announced candidates he’s at 22% to 19% for Mitt Romney, 18% for Michele Bachmann, and 16% for Ron Paul. Further back are Herman Cain at 7%, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum at 5%, and Jon Huntsman at 3%.

Mitt Romney has been camped out in New Hampshire since 2009, a state he must win.

However, people in New Hampshire have a way of seeing through phonies and poseurs. So, what if they saw through Mitt Romney and rejected the low intellectual patter of Perry, Bachmann and the rest?

Jon Huntsman was also against Pres. Obama’s Libyan gamble and he also wants a swifter withdrawal from Afghanistan. Of course, his tax and policy on women’s freedoms are abysmal, but most people will be looking to the economy, which is moored in our relationship with China. Huntsman has more international game than any other Republican in the race.

Will voters in New Hampshire see through the Republican bench to Jon Huntsman, giving the serious Republican a shot? He’d sure bring back some intellectual mojo that’s dipped into ignoramus territory since the Tea Party faction took the House.

Obama versus Huntsman, now that would be a presidential debate worthy of our great country.

Read full story · Comments { 12 }