TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Archive | September, 2011

Liberally Independent: Perry Points

Joyce L. Arnold: Liberal, lesbian, Independent, equality activist, writer.

A post from a liberal Texan’s perspective, about Rick Perry. I’m not sure there’s much to say that hasn’t been said, and I’m even less sure anything better can be said than what the wonderful Molly Ivins wrote about Perry’s predecessor, W. It absolutely applies to Perry: “The next time I tell you someone from Texas should not be President of the United States, please pay attention.”

But since there are obviously people who take seriously a possible President Perry, and since the nation actually elected W. for a second term, I’ll provide a few Perry Points on occasion.

First, if you haven’t read it, take a look at Art’s “Progressive Notes,” September 10 edition . He has a section on Perry, which includes this: “Members of his finance team says ‘it (fundraising) is going like wildfire.’” This, while the actual smoke of very large and damaging wildfires is visible from Austin.

And while Perry did fly back to Texas when the wildfires, which have been going on since last December, got so large that they were getting national attention again, apparently one day was all his “going like wildfire” campaign could spare. From the Texas Tribune, “Perry a No Show at Texas Wildfire Press Conference”:

Gov. Rick Perry did not show up as expected Saturday (September 10) at a news conference convened by his office to brief reporters on the Texas wildfires.

Perry aides, cited ‘logistical issues,’ and when asked where the governor was, said, “He’s in Austin.” Which is all of 30 miles from Bastrop.

Local and state officials appeared at the briefing to provide an update on a state voucher program that allows displaced residents to stay in hotels, in advance of the arrival of federal aid. Nearly 1,400 homes were destroyed in the Bastrop blaze, making it the most destructive fire in state history. Texas emergency management chief Nim Kidd also warned that as the brutal drought continues, fire danger across the state remains severe. ‘The next fire we have could be the worst one we’ve ever seen,’ (Allison) Kidd (Perry spokesperson) said.

The governor is back in Texas after wrapping up a week-long campaign swing that took him to New Hampshire, South Carolina and California. Perry also participated in his first nationally televised debate, at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library, and staged at least six fundraisers in California. He returned from California early this morning.

A Perry Point: priorities are revealed in actions.

For another insight into Perry, this from Jim Hightower, Perry Tales: Rick Is Not Who He Says He Is:

… Perry claims that his Texas Miracle is the result of him keeping the government out of the private sector’s way. But peek behind that ideological curtain, and you’ll find this startling fact: During Perry’s decade, the greatest job growth by far has come from the public sector, which has more than doubled the number of new jobs created by the private sector. …

Far from having the best unemployment rate in the nation, the Lone Star State ranks a middling 26th, behind New York, Massachusetts and other states whose ‘liberal’ governments he routinely mocks.

Even more damning, Perry’s Texas is not creating nearly enough jobs to keep up with its fast-growing population. Those 1.2 million new positions are 629,000 short of the jobs needed just to bring the state’s employment level back up to where it was in 2007. …

On his watch as governor, Texas added more minimum wage jobs than all the other 49 states combined. … He can brag that he’s brought Texans down into a tie with Mississippi for the highest percentage of workers reduced to poverty pay. …

One out of six employed Texans are now teachers, police officers, highway engineers, military personnel or other government workers — and many of these jobs were created with the federal money that Perry-the-candidate now loudly denounces. Indeed, he’s running around ranting about President Obama’s stimulus program, but he gladly accepted the third highest amount of stimulus funds taken by the 50 states. There’s his miracle.

Add to Hightower’s excellent summary this: significant numbers of those public sector employees have lost their jobs, due to cuts in the state budget.

Second Perry Point: reality is revealed in real life consequences.

Third Perry Point, via Aravosis, “GOP uber-conservative prez candidate Rick Perry signs name with heart over the ‘i’”: what I learned to do while being a life-long professional politician.

And no, I don’t think he’s gay, as the little heart signature has once again renewed that long-going speculative game. I’d be highly disappointed if I’m wrong about that.

UPDATE: The number of homes destroyed in the Bastrop fire is now up to 1500. According to NPR, that exceeds the record of homes lost in similar fire events in California.

( Photo via GayAmericaBlog )

Read full story · Comments { 4 }

New York, Weprin, Obama & Israel

**UPDATED**

It’s no coincidence that the day before the special election in New York, with an upset in the making, there is an incendiary ad on the New York Times website hitting Obama on Israel. It links to the website “Not Pro Israel.”

A Times editorial on Palestinian statehood runs today:

A United Nations vote on Palestinian membership would be ruinous. Yet with little time left before the U.N. General Assembly meets, the United States, Israel and Europe have shown insufficient urgency or boldness in trying to find a compromise solution. The need for action is even more acute after alarming tensions flared in recent days between Israel and two critical regional players — Egypt and Turkey.

There is nothing more incendiary in American politics than the Who Is More Pro Israel? fight.

There is simply no evidence that Pres. Obama is less a friend of Israel than any other establishment politician or any Republican presidential candidate vying for his job.

But that didn’t keep New York Republicans from utilizing the kitchen sink strategy in tying Weprin to Obama, while on the weekend of the 10th year commemoration of 9/11 also invoking the Ground Zero mosque to try to score political points.

Needless to say, this foreshadows what I’ve warned about for 2012, which is the painting of Obama as anti-Israel, whether it’s true or not. It’s not.

UPDATE 2: Wanted to also put up the PPP poll for those who hadn’t seen it:

The issue of Israel does appear to be having a major impact on this race. A plurality of voters- 37%- said that Israel was ‘very important’ in determining their votes. Turner is winning those folks by an amazing 71-22 margin. With everyone who doesn’t say Israel is a very important issue for them Weprin actually leads 52-36. Turner is in fact winning the Jewish vote by a 56-39 margin, very unusual for a Republican candidate. This seems to be rooted in deep unhappiness with Obama on this issue- only 30% of voters overall approve of how he’s handling Israel to 54% who disapprove and with Jewish voters his approval on Israel is 22% with 68 of voters disapproving. That has a lot to do with why Turner’s in such a strong position.

UPDATE: Good post over at DK on this race:

It’s not necessarily over for Weprin, but if one-time Obama voters are now showing up to vote Republican, that’s a pretty brutal sign. Coming on top of Siena’s poll which also had Turner up by six, it’s hard to see much cause for optimism.

Read full story · Comments { 6 }

TPaw Endorses Romney

“Perry’s support comes mostly from Republicans who support the tea party movement, although he has a statistically insignificant edge among non-tea party Republicans as well,” says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. – New CNN Poll: Perry on top when it comes to electability

Tonight is another debate, this one on CNN from Florida, where Rick Perry is sure to get a chance to reset his remarks on Social Security. It comes as Rick Perry is being called the frontrunner, but remains in my view the latest flavor of the season against iron man Mitt, who all along knew his path to the presidential nomination was to be the last man standing.

So today from NRO this morning comes “My Endorsement: Mitt Romney for President”:

Fortunately, America may get a second chance: Mitt Romney is running for president, and I am proud to endorse him.

Alone among the contenders, he possesses the unique qualifications to confront and master our severe economic predicament. His abiding faith in our country’s exceptional historical position as a beacon of freedom will make him the most important leader in a world that depends upon a strong America to stay at peace.

I’m wondering if this endorsement by Tim Pawlenty is the opening shot from the establishment, who obviously believes Rick Perry will get pummeled by Pres. Obama in the general election?

You can bet the White House is crossing their fingers on this one, as they get ready to take another blow, this one from Queens, New York, as the special election could deliver a huge upset in the race against Turner vs. Weprin, with the Republican poised to win Anthony Weiner’s old seat.

Read full story · Comments { 2 }

The Cost of Fear: Osama Won

by NOLA LOPEZ

“The dangerous trend in Pakistan,” he said, “is that there is far more hate for America now than there was ever love of Osama.”Mission Unfinished, BY JILL ABRAMSON – In the twilight of America’s decade-long, multibillion-dollar intervention, Afghanistan remains highly unstable, the Pakistanis trust us less than ever, and it is not at all clear how “the big things are going to turn out.”

As the man who gave the order to kill Osama bin Laden fights for his reelection amidst horrific economic times, there can be only one conclusion. We blew it.

Osama bin Laden’s purpose in targeting the financial heart of the United States was to bring the body of our economic engine to its knees.

Mission accomplished.

There’s little doubt, as Pres. Obama’s new SecDef decides troops should stay in Iraq, while Mr. Obama continues to make the case for endless engagement in Afghanistan, while our economic health is on life support, we’ve lost sight of creating our own destiny by looking forward instead of back.

Once the airlines opened after 9/11, I took a very long flight to a family wedding. We hopscotched across the country, we lonely 8 in the plane, after we each were searched within an inch of our lives, which began the unraveling of what America means, because fear had gripped our soul.

Then we did the unthinkable, the most un-American of acts: we tortured.

In “The Making of a Man,” which I wrote 11 years ago after Pres. Bush’s eloquent speech at the National Cathedral, I never suspected what his Administration would plot next.

Former Pres. George W. Bush and V.P. Dick Cheney have a lot for which they should be made to answer, however, instead they’ve both enjoyed a rehabilitation.

Preemptive war in Iraq on the wings of the new U.S. policy of regime change, while keeping the costs off the books, was one of the single worst economic wounds to be dealt to this country.

The drum beat to war singled the death of American journalism, with uncritical thinking, access and cowardice the media’s chosen path.

It allowed Afghanistan to weaken, with candidate Obama inspired to label Afghanistan the “good war” from which it seems we shall never be freed.

Today our economy is hobbled, with the response from Wall Street to 9/11 being greed and recklessness, while our politicians, no matter the party, looked the other way for fear their campaign coffers wouldn’t be filled.

All of this was laid on the ground of fear. The fear that terrorists would hit us again. That sacrificing civil liberties was the cost. That solidifying our future in the global, 21st century economy wasn’t the priority.

A grateful China kept busy.

Our leaders believed that keeping us safe had everything to do with militarism, but forgot the most important part of our national security strength is our economic prowess and the ability to build, compete and challenge nations whose armies are secondary, because the U.S. is the global policeman on which they can rely.

This is no longer F.D.R.’s America. It’s not even John F. Kennedy’s anymore.

Our economic weaknesses today were laid on the foundation from Pres. Bush, who said to go shopping, while he plotted to attack Iraq, a country that had nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11. It came after a decade of peace and prosperity that handed him a surplus which he blew through with the reckless abandon of a drunken teenager with an unlimited credit line.

…and Pres. Obama and the Democrats simply shrugged and said we need to move on, while ignoring the legacy of Bush-Cheney, which was an economy on its knees.

You can call this politics.

I call it truth.

He may be dead, but he drove our leaders to distraction that led to the collapse of our economy, which was his main goal 10 years ago today.

Read full story · Comments { 19 }

Sunday Morning Early-Bird News Round-Up

Good morning and welcome to Sunday.

On this day in history, September 11, 2001, the U.S. suffered it’s worst terror attack on domestic soil as terrorists hijacked 4 planes and targeted NY and Washington D.C. for attack. The Sunday talk shows will be replete with commemorations, interviews, retrospectives, etc.

Some morning links:

~Here is a link to a video message from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton about 9/11.

~Relations between Egypt and Israel have suffered another setback after a mob of Egyptian protesters stormed the Israeli embassy in Cairo, causing the Ambassador and his family to flee. Riots also broke out in Tahrir Square as protesters become disillusioned with the current military dictatorship. Speaking of which, Human Rights Watch says that the Egyptian military post-Mubarak has been trying thousands of civilians in closed-door military trials, consolidating their power and undermining and real attempt to transition to democracy.

~After 9/11 the Department of Homeland Security wasted billions of taxpayer dollars on pet projects that enriched the security/military industrial complex. Where’s the outrage from the fiscal hawks?

~A Wisconsin state employee has been fired for whistleblowing regarding voter suppression in the state. I certainly hope this person has their day in court and sues the pants off Wisconsin.

~Ohio Governor John Kasich is warning that the state’s union-busting, anti-worker law is overturned via referendum it would be very, very bad for Ohio. [read: bad for Big Business]

~Over at The Nation, Greg Mitchell rips NYT editor Bill Keller a new one for Keller’s way-too-late-and-still-clueless non-apology for the NYT being a shameless cheerleader for the Iraq War. You know, instead of being a journalistic venue that seeks to hold those in power accountable, particularly during times of crisis and fear, when the government is more likely than not to abuse that power.

~Barack Obama and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas are no longer speaking.

~Oklahoma state Republican Sally Kern is commemorating 9/11 by claiming that homosexuality is a bigger threat to the United States than terrorism.

~Dick Cheney, still a liar.

~Speaking of Dick Cheney, I wonder what his response to this would be?

~The ACLU has released a detailed report about the devastating impact the government’s response to 9/11 has had on civil liberties.

~Along those same lines, Justin Elliot looks at how the Obama administration has used “terrorism” to selectively silence and criminalize certain speech.

~NBC’s twitter feed was hacked.

~The issue of Israel looms large over the race for Anthony Weiner’s former Congressional seat. Here are some of the questionable GOP ads/mailers they are sending out. The WaPo’s Jennifer Rubin is helping out the GOP candidate in the race by smearing Obama’s record with/on Israel- she does so by “interviewing” Bill Kristol of the Emergency Committee for Israel but she neglects to disclose that she is a founding member of that decidedly partisan group.

~A positive story- the program ‘Give Back A Smile’ provides free dental care for survivors of abuse whose teeth have been broken or damaged. It may not seem like much but I am sure for the women who can’t ordinarily afford the services, it is very important. Here is the website for the program.

~In Madisonville, Tennessee students are trying to get school officials to allow them to form a gay-straight alliance, due in large part to the pervasive bullying of glbt students. The school officials are refusing. What year is it again?

~Mel Gibson seems to be trying to rehabilitate his [anti-Semitic] image with a new film about the Jewish historical figure Judah Maccabee. Some aren’t buying into this conversion.

~A moose in Sweden apparently got drunk on fermented apples and got himself stuck in a tree. He was ok after they got him down.

~Will the Democrats really step up to the plate and formally embrace gay marriage as a policy stance? That seems overly optimistic.

~The House of Representatives passed a resolution to “never forget 9/11.” That’s all well and good but it’s time to get past the symbolic gestures and do some actual, you know, work.

~Obama’s re-election team is hoping to raise $55 million in just the third quarter. Many are saying this will be a billion dollar election. That’s obscene and it doesn’t speak well for our democracy.

The End.

Read full story · Comments { 2 }

9/11 Commemoration: Three Presidents, Different Perspectives

“There has always been a special place in the common memory for people who deliberately, knowingly, certainly lay down their lives for other people to live. …” – Pres. Bill Clinton

Every time I hear the word “anniversary” invoked for 9/11 I cringe. There is nothing celebratory about the date, with it a commemoration of a horrific tragedy that now with the 9/11 memorials in place should take a new spot in our national dialogue. Revisiting the history of it that has an end, which came with Pres. Obama’s call to send Seal Team Six into Pakistan to risk it all to kill Osama bin Laden.

The politics of 9/11, however, will go on, as we saw last Sunday on Fox News with Chris Wallace, when the anchor decided not ask former V.P. Dick Cheney about the killing of Osama bin Laden, because the thought of crediting Pres. Obama with an extraordinary point of leadership, which didn’t require torturing anyone, would be just too much for FNC viewers to take.

From Politico, the politics of 9/11.

A decade later, 9/11 has finally brought the political parties together in this respect: They’ve both mastered the art of politicizing the terrorist attacks.

[...] But the presence of 9/11 in politics is as profuse as ever. Most recently – days ahead of the tenth anniversary of the attacks – candidates in a New York congressional election have traded sharp accusations over who’s more committed to protecting the country from terrorism and supporting first responders.

Continue Reading →

Read full story · Comments { 7 }

Progressive Notes: Tammy Baldwin a Go, Perry ‘On Fire,’ and Other Happenings

Art offers his perspective as a movement progressive activist.

Rep. Grijalva on MSNBC urging a bolder jobs plan. He says nothing will happen with Boehner, but the debate over a bold plan will be a boon to Dems in 2012. He will and has been ignored tragically:

Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin announced this week she is running for U.S. Senate to replace retiring Senator Kohl. Baldwin is a real fighter for union, civil rights and is ranked the most liberal member of congress. If elected she would be the first openly gay woman to serve. Here is her announcement video for her progressive grassroots campaign to win:

Obama’s team turned to some liberal ideas for his jobs proposals this week. Two especially deserve praise and attention. One is FAST (which is billions to green our schools) and the other is called “work sharing” from Dean Baker, which would vastly improve the plight of the jobless on UI:

The White House proposes $25 billion for K-12 schools ($10 billion to the 100 largest high-need districts; $15 billion to states to direct as they choose) and another $5 billion for community colleges. The funds could be used for “a range of emergency repair and renovation projects, greening and energy efficiency upgrades, asbestos abatement and removal, and modernization efforts to build new science and computer labs and to upgrade technology in our schools.”

The plan is based on the FAST! (Fix America’s Schools Today) proposal outlined by Mary Filardo of the 21st Century School Fund, Jared Bernstein of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, and Ross Eisenbrey of the Economic Policy Institute….

The other good idea is buried in the section of the American Jobs Act on helping the unemployed. Obama will “expand ‘work-sharing’ to encourage arrangements using [unemployment insurance] that keep employees on the job at reduced hours, rather than laying them off.” This is another excellent and perpetually overlooked idea, inspired by the German practice of Kurzarbeit, or “short-work.”

Dean Baker over at the Center for Economic and Policy Research has been beating this drum for a while…

Work sharing would be a progressive welcome addition in America. Greening our schools would have vast positive impacts on the nation. Also, another great progressive part of the bill is one the Tri-Caucus has been pushing for very hard for. A program for young folks in desperate need of job skills and employment:

Investing in Low-Income Youth and Adults: The President is proposing a new Pathways Back to Work Fund to provide hundreds of thousands of low-income youth and adults with opportunities to work and to achieve needed training in growth industries. The Initiative will do three things: i) support summer and year-round jobs for youth, building off of successful programs that supported over 370,000 such jobs in 2009 and 2010; ii) support subsidized employment opportunities for low-income individuals who are unemployed, building off the successful TANF Emergency Contingency Fund wage subsidy program that supported 260,000 jobs in 2009 and 2010; and iii) support promising and innovative local work-based job and training initiatives to place low-income adults and youths in jobs quickly.

See the full fact-sheet on the jobs bill here.

John Avarosis at Americablog has it down pat on what liberals have to do, and that means us, about the shift to the Right going on in the Democratic Party. It is time, high time, we get some inner Teabagger in us. Raise hell. And yes many liberals have been doing this all over but it is time to take it to another level. Avarosis opines on what Obama has wrought on us all and the best response:

The biggest concern right now is that our economy is going to remain just as it is – flaccid – for years to come. Yes, all your fears about losing your job, finding a job, being able to afford your mortgage and your car payments, being able to pay for your kids’ doctor visits – it’s never going to get better, at least not for a very long time, and not with the current crop of Democrats and Republicans in the Congress and the White House.

So what that means is that when the super cuts kick in, in January of 2013, the economy is going to be further thrown into chaos. Government spending will plummet, GDP growth will likely drop, unemployment will likely increase, and whatever hardship you’re facing right now will almost certainly be worse. And it will be courtesy of Barack Obama…

We must emulate Get Equal and raise hell and not stand down:

The only way to force change is to stand up to politicians, just like the Teabaggers did during health care reform, and just like the gay community did to President Obama on a myriad of our issues.

It’s amazing how well interrupting a few presidential and congressional fundraisers cleanses the political palate.

Yes I know. Taylor has long advocated we tap our inner Tea Party, but Avarosis gives a chilling spin on this notion. Obama’s debt deal will hurt us badly and personally. We have got to find fight in us or we are doomed.

Alex Lawson, from the great Social Security Works, went to the first Super Committee meeting this week and tried filming it as the committee has banned footage. But a funny thing happened. Protests broke outside the hearing room and it shook up committee members. This is how it is done and must be done.

The account in part from FDL:

About midway through the introductory statements from super committee members I heard chanting coming through the partially opened doors, “Jobs Not Cuts! Jobs Not Cuts!” and “What do we want? Jobs! When do we want them? Now!”

I left the committee room to capture some footage of what was going on, there were over 20 protesters from a local employment advocacy group Our DC, they stood in the hallway chanting about the need for jobs. Seeing as though District unemployment surpasses a 20 year high and Ward 8 in Southeast Washington has the nation’s highest pocket of unemployed residents, it makes sense that people were motivated enough to risk arrest to get their message out.

The Capitol police handled the situation pretty well. It was a chaotic scene with a ton of media, onlookers and protesters mixed about. The Capitol police separated the protesters and moved them down the hall and then slowly allowed people back into the committee room. I later asked some Capitol police officers outside if any arrests were made and they responded “no.”

..I say kudos to Our DC for bring the people’s message to the super committee, risking arrest to make sure that committee members know that the American public want jobs not committees, jobs not meetings, jobs not photo ops, jobs not cuts!

The story of next week might not be jobs but be about how the Democrats lost Ny-09, a seat they held since 1923 in Queens. Furious voters in a strong Dem district that is heavily Jewish are determined to show their rage at Obama for the economy and his weakness. Pre-debt deal Obama had a 52 pct approval here, now it is 42pct and thus the Dem, a Orthodox Jew, has lost the lead. This despite Weprin running a campaign on boosting SS payments for seniors and opposing any cuts like Obama is pushing. As sickening a loss as that of Coakley in MA in 2009.

Right wing laughs! Governor Rick Perry’s Texas is having major wildfires, destroying 1,000s of homes and lives. But do not worry. Perry left the state for a debate and a fundraising swoop. Too bad for all that much less what his team is saying about his trip:

As the late arrival in the race, Perry has already proved his bona fides as a world-class fundraiser. Members of his finance team says “it is going like wildfire” and their California schedule backs up the claim.

Rather than returning immediately to his burning state, Perry headlined fundraisers in San Diego, Newport Beach, Los Angeles, Bakersfield, San Jose and Fresno, as well as several public rallies.

Oh boy these people are nauseating! Senator Graham (R-SC) wants to have a federal law mandating anyone who votes must have a voter i.d. He says he wants to do this because elections are sacred. Uh yeah right. The GOP wants this law to keep minorities, the poor and elderly from voting.

Read full story · Comments { 7 }

Queer Talk: Millennial generational changes

Joyce L. Arnold: Liberal, lesbian, Independent, equality activist, writer.

If you were born on or after December 21, 1993, Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Don’t Pursue has always been law – those who are gay, lesbian or bisexual (not transgender) could serve in the U.S. military, but not “openly.” Over 14,000 service members have been discharged under that law. Three years later, on September 21, 1996, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was signed into law.

For all the gains made in LGBT equality in the last 18 years (DADT), and the last 15 years (DOMA), these laws have been two indications that our federal government sees us as separate and not equal. In less than two weeks, on September 20, 2011, DADT will be gone – more on that next week.

DOMA remains. Obama has been all over the marriage equality map – including repeated statements that he does not support marriage between same-gender couples – but whatever his personal feelings, in February of this year, his administration announced it will no longer defend DOMA against federal court challenges. That, along with the introduction of the “Respect for Marriage Act” in both Senate and House, as well as polling that consistently shows a growing support for marriage equality, indicate the slow steps toward the removal of DOMA continue.

A recent poll reinforced the fact that the “Millennial” generation, or what it represents, may well be a significant factor in gaining LGBT equality. That the “younger generation” often sees things differently than many in the generations of their parents and grandparents certainly isn’t new. In fact, it’s predictable. But one “new” thing in the case of the Millennials is, relatively speaking, a stronger support for LGBT equality than ever before. Via Care2, “Millennials Promise Brighter Future for Gay Rights:

Millennials, those aged between 18-29, are much more accepting of LGBT rights when compared to those 65 and over, says the Millennials, Religion & Gay and Lesbian Issues Survey carried out by Public Religion Research … .

Among Millennials, more than 6 out of 10 (62%) favor allowing same-sex marriage, 69% favor same-sex couples jointly adopting children, 71% support civil unions and 79% back LGBT-inclusive employment nondiscrimination legislation. …

This compared to seniors where only 1 in 3 say they favor same-sex marriage (31%). Seniors also reported lower support for same-sex parent adoption (31%).

The Millennials’ support is not limited to “progressives.”

Around 49% of young self-identifying Republicans support allowing same-sex couples to marry. … That figure outstrips the general level of support among Republicans as a whole which stands at 31%.

Also of key interest may be that 44% of white evangelical Millennials also support same-sex marriage … .

… other points of interest are that a majority (51%) of Americans now believe supporting same-sex marriage is the more socially acceptable position, and that most Americans accept LGBTs face difficulties in living life openly (51%).

… 69% of Millennials say that religious groups are alienating younger adults by being too judgmental of gay and lesbian people. Over 6 in 10 Americans, including majorities across all major religious groups say that this unfriendly discourse from religious leaders is contributing to the high suicide rate among LGBT teens, either a lot (23%) or at least a little (44%). …

The study’s authors think that it will mean 2011 will come to be a landmark where a tipping point on LGBT rights support was reached, especially among young conservatives. …

All of which is encouraging, though of course, it doesn’t guarantee changes toward equality, nor in anyway lessen the need for activism.

A few weeks ago I mentioned another report, this one by the Movement Advancement Project. As reported by Keen News :

The LGBT movement is making progress, but it’s being seriously outspent by opponents and still has ‘a long way’ to go to reach equality. That’s the conclusion of an in-depth analysis by an independent think tank devoted to studying how best to marshal the LGBT movement’s resources to ‘speed advancement of equality for LGBT people.’

Clearly in 2008, Obama was a hit with the Millennials. The 2012 Republican nominee, whoever he or she may be, will surely have a bigger job appealing to this generation than will Obama, although how 2012 compares with 2008 for the “hope and changer” remains to be seen.

The two recent Republican wannabe nationally televised events have been quite different, when it comes to LGBT “issues.” Via Keen News:

There was a complete absence of questions about LGBT-related issues at last night’s (September 7) debate among eight of the announced Republican presidential candidates. That stood in stark contrast to just two days earlier (September 5) when LGBT issues were among the dominant issues for five of the candidates.

As Keen notes, the September 5 event was

broadcast by CNN, which provided off-stage commentary; but the questions were asked by three right-wing activists: U.S. Senator Jim DeMint, U.S. Rep. Steven King, and conservative law professor Robert George.

… the panelists … used the opportunity to deliver extended remarks about their own opinions concerning LGBT related matters while purportedly asking questions of the candidates.

The questions, “remarks” and candidate “the gays are not like us” responses don’t seem likely to appeal to the Millennials, or anyone else, who supports LGBT equality. Of course, Robert George is basically correct with this:

‘All the major candidates for presidency in 2012, including President Obama, believe that marriage is properly defined in our laws as the union of husband and wife.’

If 2011 becomes a “tipping point” regarding LGBT equality the growing support of the Millennials will be a key factor. Not to take anything away from them, but it’s important to remember that the changes they represent are directly related to the work of earlier efforts. “Tipping points” take generations of groundwork to achieve.

Unfortunately, it appears it may be necessary to think in terms of several more generations yet before the Republican and Democratic Duopoly manages to catch up. Looking at the photo accompanying this post, however, gives me great hope that working together, the generations will make equality happen.

(Photo via Wipeout Hate on Facebook)

Read full story · Comments { 6 }

Dash of Dan: White Chocolate Chunk-Butterscotch Cookies

I was once told our sense of smell was connected to emotion more than any other sense.

You remember the apple pie your grandmother made, the aroma weaving its way through the house.

A bride recalls her bouquet of lilacs and baby’s breath as she walked down the aisle.

Dad mowed the lawn on Sundays, the scent of freshly cut grass and the sound of a churning motor.

These are the moments we remember, in large part due to our sense of  smell.

Which brings us to these cookies.

Butterscotch is absolutely one of my favorite flavors and it’s caramely aroma is like none other. As a child I loved those flavors, in a candy, pudding, or a cookie.

These cookies are rich in flavor and checkered with white chocolate chunks.

As they bake, you’ll notice the smell from the oven; warm and inviting.

Share or make these  with friends and family to create new moments together, (I promise you’ll remember).

Recipe:

2 sticks unsalted butter, room temperature         2 1/2 cups all purpose flour

2 cups dark brown sugar                                               1 tsp. baking powder

2 eggs                                                                                     1 tsp. baking soda

1 Tbsp. of vanilla extract                                               3/4 tsp. salt

8 ounces white chocolate cut into 1/4-inch pieces

*Preheat oven to 350 degrees                 *Line two baking sheets with parchment or silpats

 

  1. In a mixer fitted with the paddle attachment mix together the butter and dark brown sugar, until light and fluffy, scraping down the sides of the bowl as needed.
  2. In a medium bowl sift together flour, baking powder, baking soda, and salt. Set aside.
  3. On medium speed add the eggs to the butter/sugar mixture, beating well after each addition. Mix in vanilla.
  4. On low speed add the reserved flour mixture then add the white chocolate chunks, until just added.
  5. Using a cookie scoop or a tablespoon, scoop 2 tablespoons of dough on to the prepared sheets ( the cookies do spread a little, so allow for adequate space). Bake for about 15 minutes, until the edges are slightly golden brown. Cool on wire racks and when ready remove cookies and store in an airtight container.

 

This is an open thread! Let me know what’s on your mind, whether it’s sweets, politics, or something you’ve seen in the news. When I’m not stuffing my face with these cookies, I promise to answer any questions and always appreciate the feedback.

 

 

Read full story · Comments { 7 }

Don’t Worry, Jon, Rick ‘Ponzi’ Perry Will Not Be Our Next President

Even a mention of Abraham Lincoln, “a Republican president who mobilized government to build the transcontinental railroad,” brought no applause from the GOP side. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.) yawned. One Republican backbencher, Jeff Landry of Louisiana, chose this moment to hold up a sign demanding “Drilling = Jobs.” So now even Lincoln doesn’t merit Republican applause when Obama invokes his name? If it weren’t so disturbing, it would be kind of funny. – The irrelevancy of the Obama presidency

It may be Barack Obama or Mitt Romney, but it definitely won’t be Rick Perry (though no one can doubt those wacky Republican primary voters could nominate the crackpot).

Consider this a topic free for all, any subject goes. Happy Friday!


Read full story · Comments { 5 }

Democratic Self-Loathing Puts Weiner Seat in Play

Republicans don’t have the Democratic gene of self-loathing. They’re permanently self-righteous, which is why Sen. Vitter is still in the Senate.

So, compliments of Rep. Nancy Pelosi, Rep. Steve Israel, Pres. Obama and the rest of the Democratic pack whose self-loathing made them jettison Rep. Anthony Weiner over an embarrassing and reckless act that included no actual sex, unlike David Vitter and his rumored but unproven diaper fetish, Democrats may lose the seat.

From Politico, with the very apt title that begins with “Poll Shocker”:

Republicans are poised for a dramatic upset in next week’s special election for a New York City congressional seat, according to a new poll out Friday.

The survey, conducted by the Siena Research Institute, found Republican Bob Turner holding a 50 percent to 44 percent lead over Democrat David Weprin.

[...] On Thursday, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee announced it was pouring $500,000 on the New York City airwaves for Weprin. The Democratic-boosting House Majority PAC is also running ads in the race’s final days.

This is also representative of the last approval rating of Pres. Obama in New York, which is the first time he’s been in negative territory in his presidency.

Read full story · Comments { 10 }

Liberally Independent: Two Parties = Too Few Choices, Part VII

Joyce L. Arnold: Liberal, lesbian, Independent, equality activist, writer.

I’m introducing my “Liberally Independent” column today, which will include the Two Parties = Too Few Choices series. I wanted a way to look more broadly, and LI will allow that.

In considering the Two Party Front for the Oligarchy in this column, I’m primarily using two, recent articles. Both offer criticisms of the Democratic Party and Obama. But both, from my perspective, do so within the confines of the Duopoly.

The perpetuation of the two party system is a necessity for most Insider /Access status holders. When they talk about “change,” it’s almost always defined by the existing system. My take: any actual reform, any new or third party, requires working to break out of that structure.

One way of considering how the Democratic party relates to its critics on the Left is by looking at the words they use when talking about them. In general, “liberal” is bad; “centrist” and “progressive” can be good, bad, or simply vague. Challenges to two party thinking are met with words ranging from condescending to hostile.

Matt Stoller’s article “What Democrats can do about Obama”, has received a lot of attention. He writes: (all emphasis mine)

Democrats may soon have to confront an uncomfortable truth, and ask whether Obama is a suitable choice at the top of the ticket in 2012. They may then have to ask themselves if there’s any way they can push him off the top of the ticket. That these questions have not yet been asked in any serious way shows how weak the Democratic Party is as a political organization. Yet this political weakness is not inevitable, it can be changed through courage and collective action by a few party insiders smart and principled enough to understand the value of a public debate, and by activists who are courageous enough to face the real legacy of the Obama years.

Asserting that questions haven’t been asked in “any serious way” is to dismiss the many people – including “activists who are courageous” – who have, in fact, been questioning. Stoller’s way of changing the Democratic half of the Duopoly relies on “party insiders.” This attitude is one reason Obama doesn’t need to consider stepping down, as some say he should / will. It fits the Insider goal of perpetuating the existing system. Stoller continues:

Political parties need to be flexible enough to allow for new ideas to come into the process, or else third parties or civil disorder are inevitable. …

All it would take to provide this flexibility are well-known Democratic elders who understand that rank and file Democrats deserve a choice, and a few political insiders who realize that they can increase their own power by encouraging a robust debate. I don’t think this will happen. But just imagine if it did.

I read somewhere that this is Stoller’s “wake-up call” to the Dem Elites. But his protective use of Insider framing can muffle any non-Insider alarm bells.

Another recent article is by Jonathan Chait, “What the Left Doesn’t Understand About Obama”. I read this as an apologist, “you non-Insiders don’t know what you’re talking about” framing. And here is where that use of language I was talking about is explicit.

This has been the summer that liberal discontent with Obama has finally crystallized. The frustration has been simmering for a while — through centrist appointments, bank bailouts and the defeat of the public option, to name a few examples. But it has taken the debt-ceiling standoff and the threat of a double-dip recession to create a leftist critique of the president that stuck.

It’s “liberal,” “leftist” discontent he characterizes as “magical thinking.” He acknowledges that “Obama underestimated the depth of the (economic) crisis in 2009,” but then goes here:

And yet the wave of criticism from the left over the stimulus is fundamentally flawed: it ignores the real choices Obama faced (and the progressive decisions he made) and wishes away any constraints upon his power. …

The most common hallmark of the left’s magical thinking is a failure to recognize that Congress is a separate, coequal branch of government consisting of members whose goals may differ from the president’s. …

His criticism isn’t of Obama, or the Democratic Party, or the Duopoly. It’s the non-serious “left,” with their “liberal indictment of Obama.” He concludes:

Liberal critics of Obama, just like conservative critics of Republican presidents, generally want both maximal partisan conflict and maximal legislative achievement. In the real world, those two things are often at odds. Hence the allure of magical thinking.

Vastleft writes:

… Chait trots out Opologists’ straw man du jour, the claim that lefties who critique Obama’s conservative policies imagine that Federal government is a one-man band … .

Vastleft calls Obama’s policies what I think they are, “conservative,” not as Chait characterizes them, “centrist” – a Duopoly framing. In fact, there are those who are challenging that system, seeking party and issue focused reform, and new / third parties, as I’ve highlighted in this series. Publicly, the Two Party Front for the Oligarchy usually ignores such things, but the 2012 election polls reveal the need for some condescending condemnation.

Paul Street’s essay, Four Heretical Thoughts and More in the Wake of the Obama Disaster provides a non-Insider perspective. A sample:

What really matters is that citizens and activists develop the capacity to build energetic rank and file social and political movements whichever party ‘rules’ and beneath and beyond the ‘two party system’ and the narrow spectrum big money big media candidate-centered ‘electoral extravaganzas’ (allow) … .

Street provides a partial list of

many reported and under-reported examples of popular resistance that have occurred this year – U.S. Uncut’s actions against corporate tax breaks and loopholes enjoyed by … bailout recipients, the Midwestern public worker rebellion sparked in Madison …, the … Verizon strike, … Latino protests against the Obama administration’s, mass-deportation-ist ‘Secure Communities’ program …, the … protest of the Keystone project, and … a forthcoming October convergence against war and corporate greed in Washington.

The self-perpetuating Two Party system is characterized by what might be considered as “magical thinking” : if we Insiders don’t acknowledge it, it doesn’t happen. What’s Left to do includes rejecting such framing, and defining our own realities.

Posts in this series:

Grading the Electoral College
Two Parties = Too Few Choices
Two Parties = Too Few Choices, Part II
Two Parties = Too Few Choices, Part III
Two Parties = Too Few Choices, Part IV
Two Parties = Too Few Choices, Part V
Two Parties = Too Few Choices, Part VI

( Photo via WatchingFrogsBoil )

Read full story · Comments { 6 }

Pres. Obama, Where’s the Leverage?

“Pass this jobs bill… Pass this jobs bill… Pass this jobs bill…” times 17. The patter was hot and strong from the top, while Pres. Obama rocked the house. But it eventually broke down to blousy rhetoric meant to reach out to Independent and swing voters, but also Republicans.

Oh, and next week we’re going to do deficit reduction, and Medicare “reform,” meaning benefit changes and raising the retirement age.

Part of what I said to the Dow Jones/WSJ digital unit:

7:19 P.M: Obama said early in the speech that it’s not about politics. Is that true?

“Of course not,” said Taylor Marsh, political blogger and analyst. “The reason he did this speech in the first place is all political. And anyone who says this isn’t part of a re-election speech isn’t facing reality.”

He could be more aggressive, said Marsh.

“He needs to pressure his opponents so they feel uncomfortable saying no. He needs to target his opponents and focus on the need for infrastructure in their districts,” she said. “Pick a bridge in Boehner’s district and cite that as a need for spending. He needs to get in their face.”

It looks like Obama is going to Cantor’s home turf tomorrow, then Boehner’s, but what project is he going to be talking about? That’s the bottom line.

At one point, Marc Ambinder tweeted exactly what I was thinking: Conservatives don’t like to hear it, but when Obama’s in this mode, most Americans like him. And they want him to succeed.

Pres. Obama needs to start reading more about Lyndon Baines Johnson. If there’s no tactic to shame Republicans into passing the bill, why will they?

Full text below…

Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, and fellow Americans:

Tonight we meet at an urgent time for our country. We continue to face an economic crisis that has left millions of our neighbors jobless, and a political crisis that has made things worse.

This past week, reporters have been asking “What will this speech mean for the President? What will it mean for Congress? How will it affect their polls, and the next election?”

But the millions of Americans who are watching right now: they don’t care about politics. They have real life concerns. Many have spent months looking for work. Others are doing their best just to scrape by – giving up nights out with the family to save on gas or make the mortgage; postponing retirement to send a kid to college.

These men and women grew up with faith in an America where hard work and responsibility paid off. They believed in a country where everyone gets a fair shake and does their fair share – where if you stepped up, did your job, and were loyal to your company, that loyalty would be rewarded with a decent salary and good benefits; maybe a raise once in awhile. If you did the right thing, you could make it in America.

But for decades now, Americans have watched that compact erode. They have seen the deck too often stacked against them. And they know that Washington hasn’t always put their interests first.

The people of this country work hard to meet their responsibilities. The question tonight is whether we’ll meet ours. The question is whether, in the face of an ongoing national crisis, we can stop the political circus and actually do something to help the economy; whether we can restore some of the fairness and security that has defined this nation since our beginning.

Those of us here tonight can’t solve all of our nation’s woes. Ultimately, our recovery will be driven not by Washington, but by our businesses and our workers. But we can help. We can make a difference. There are steps we can take right now to improve people’s lives.

I am sending this Congress a plan that you should pass right away. It’s called the American Jobs Act. There should be nothing controversial about this piece of legislation. Everything in here is the kind of proposal that’s been supported by both Democrats and Republicans – including many who sit here tonight. And everything in this bill will be paid for. Everything.

The purpose of the American Jobs Act is simple: to put more people back to work and more money in the pockets of those who are working. It will create more jobs for construction workers, more jobs for teachers, more jobs for veterans, and more jobs for the long-term unemployed. It will provide a tax break for companies who hire new workers, and it will cut payroll taxes in half for every working American and every small business. It will provide a jolt to an economy that has stalled, and give companies confidence that if they invest and hire, there will be customers for their products and services. You should pass this jobs plan right away.

Everyone here knows that small businesses are where most new jobs begin. And you know that while corporate profits have come roaring back, smaller companies haven’t. So for everyone who speaks so passionately about making life easier for “job creators,” this plan is for you.

Pass this jobs bill, and starting tomorrow, small businesses will get a tax cut if they hire new workers or raise workers’ wages. Pass this jobs bill, and all small business owners will also see their payroll taxes cut in half next year. If you have 50 employees making an average salary, that’s an $80,000 tax cut. And all businesses will be able to continue writing off the investments they make in 2012.

It’s not just Democrats who have supported this kind of proposal. Fifty House Republicans have proposed the same payroll tax cut that’s in this plan. You should pass it right away.

Pass this jobs bill, and we can put people to work rebuilding America. Everyone here knows that we have badly decaying roads and bridges all over this country. Our highways are clogged with traffic. Our skies are the most congested in the world.

This is inexcusable. Building a world-class transportation system is part of what made us an economic superpower. And now we’re going to sit back and watch China build newer airports and faster railroads? At a time when millions of unemployed construction workers could build them right here in America?

There are private construction companies all across America just waiting to get to work. There’s a bridge that needs repair between Ohio and Kentucky that’s on one of the busiest trucking routes in North America. A public transit project in Houston that will help clear up one of the worst areas of traffic in the country. And there are schools throughout this country that desperately need renovating. How can we expect our kids to do their best in places that are literally falling apart? This is America. Every child deserves a great school – and we can give it to them, if we act now.

The American Jobs Act will repair and modernize at least 35,000 schools. It will put people to work right now fixing roofs and windows; installing science labs and high-speed internet in classrooms all across this country. It will rehabilitate homes and businesses in communities hit hardest by foreclosures. It will jumpstart thousands of transportation projects across the country. And to make sure the money is properly spent and for good purposes, we’re building on reforms we’ve already put in place. No more earmarks. No more boondoggles. No more bridges to nowhere. We’re cutting the red tape that prevents some of these projects from getting started as quickly as possible. And we’ll set up an independent fund to attract private dollars and issue loans based on two criteria: how badly a construction project is needed and how much good it would do for the economy.

This idea came from a bill written by a Texas Republican and a Massachusetts Democrat. The idea for a big boost in construction is supported by America’s largest business organization and America’s largest labor organization. It’s the kind of proposal that’s been supported in the past by Democrats and Republicans alike. You should pass it right away.

Pass this jobs bill, and thousands of teachers in every state will go back to work. These are the men and women charged with preparing our children for a world where the competition has never been tougher. But while they’re adding teachers in places like South Korea, we’re laying them off in droves. It’s unfair to our kids. It undermines their future and ours. And it has to stop. Pass this jobs bill, and put our teachers back in the classroom where they belong.

Pass this jobs bill, and companies will get extra tax credits if they hire America’s veterans. We ask these men and women to leave their careers, leave their families, and risk their lives to fight for our country. The last thing they should have to do is fight for a job when they come home.

Pass this bill, and hundreds of thousands of disadvantaged young people will have the hope and dignity of a summer job next year. And their parents, low-income Americans who desperately want to work, will have more ladders out of poverty.

Pass this jobs bill, and companies will get a $4,000 tax credit if they hire anyone who has spent more than six months looking for a job. We have to do more to help the long-term unemployed in their search for work. This jobs plan builds on a program in Georgia that several Republican leaders have highlighted, where people who collect unemployment insurance participate in temporary work as a way to build their skills while they look for a permanent job. The plan also extends unemployment insurance for another year. If the millions of unemployed Americans stopped getting this insurance, and stopped using that money for basic necessities, it would be a devastating blow to this economy. Democrats and Republicans in this Chamber have supported unemployment insurance plenty of times in the past. At this time of prolonged hardship, you should pass it again – right away.

Pass this jobs bill, and the typical working family will get a fifteen hundred dollar tax cut next year. Fifteen hundred dollars that would have been taken out of your paycheck will go right into your pocket. This expands on the tax cut that Democrats and Republicans already passed for this year. If we allow that tax cut to expire – if we refuse to act – middle-class families will get hit with a tax increase at the worst possible time. We cannot let that happen. I know some of you have sworn oaths to never raise any taxes on anyone for as long as you live. Now is not the time to carve out an exception and raise middle-class taxes, which is why you should pass this bill right away.

This is the American Jobs Act. It will lead to new jobs for construction workers, teachers, veterans, first responders, young people and the long-term unemployed. It will provide tax credits to companies that hire new workers, tax relief for small business owners, and tax cuts for the middle-class. And here’s the other thing I want the American people to know: the American Jobs Act will not add to the deficit. It will be paid for. And here’s how:

The agreement we passed in July will cut government spending by about $1 trillion over the next ten years. It also charges this Congress to come up with an additional $1.5 trillion in savings by Christmas. Tonight, I’m asking you to increase that amount so that it covers the full cost of the American Jobs Act. And a week from Monday, I’ll be releasing a more ambitious deficit plan – a plan that will not only cover the cost of this jobs bill, but stabilize our debt in the long run.

This approach is basically the one I’ve been advocating for months. In addition to the trillion dollars of spending cuts I’ve already signed into law, it’s a balanced plan that would reduce the deficit by making additional spending cuts; by making modest adjustments to health care programs like Medicare and Medicaid; and by reforming our tax code in a way that asks the wealthiest Americans and biggest corporations to pay their fair share. What’s more, the spending cuts wouldn’t happen so abruptly that they’d be a drag on our economy, or prevent us from helping small business and middle-class families get back on their feet right away.

Now, I realize there are some in my party who don’t think we should make any changes at all to Medicare and Medicaid, and I understand their concerns. But here’s the truth. Millions of Americans rely on Medicare in their retirement. And millions more will do so in the future. They pay for this benefit during their working years. They earn it. But with an aging population and rising health care costs, we are spending too fast to sustain the program. And if we don’t gradually reform the system while protecting current beneficiaries, it won’t be there when future retirees need it. We have to reform Medicare to strengthen it.

I’m also well aware that there are many Republicans who don’t believe we should raise taxes on those who are most fortunate and can best afford it. But here is what every American knows. While most people in this country struggle to make ends meet, a few of the most affluent citizens and corporations enjoy tax breaks and loopholes that nobody else gets. Right now, Warren Buffet pays a lower tax rate than his secretary – an outrage he has asked us to fix. We need a tax code where everyone gets a fair shake, and everybody pays their fair share. And I believe the vast majority of wealthy Americans and CEOs are willing to do just that, if it helps the economy grow and gets our fiscal house in order.

I’ll also offer ideas to reform a corporate tax code that stands as a monument to special interest influence in Washington. By eliminating pages of loopholes and deductions, we can lower one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world. Our tax code shouldn’t give an advantage to companies that can afford the best-connected lobbyists. It should give an advantage to companies that invest and create jobs here in America.

So we can reduce this deficit, pay down our debt, and pay for this jobs plan in the process. But in order to do this, we have to decide what our priorities are. We have to ask ourselves, “What’s the best way to grow the economy and create jobs?”

Should we keep tax loopholes for oil companies? Or should we use that money to give small business owners a tax credit when they hire new workers? Because we can’t afford to do both. Should we keep tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires? Or should we put teachers back to work so our kids can graduate ready for college and good jobs? Right now, we can’t afford to do both.

This isn’t political grandstanding. This isn’t class warfare. This is simple math. These are real choices that we have to make. And I’m pretty sure I know what most Americans would choose. It’s not even close. And it’s time for us to do what’s right for our future.

The American Jobs Act answers the urgent need to create jobs right away. But we can’t stop there. As I’ve argued since I ran for this office, we have to look beyond the immediate crisis and start building an economy that lasts into the future – an economy that creates good, middle-class jobs that pay well and offer security. We now live in a world where technology has made it possible for companies to take their business anywhere. If we want them to start here and stay here and hire here, we have to be able to out-build, out-educate, and out-innovate every other country on Earth.

This task, of making America more competitive for the long haul, is a job for all of us. For government and for private companies. For states and for local communities – and for every American citizen. All of us will have to up our game. All of us will have to change the way we do business.

My administration can and will take some steps to improve our competitiveness on our own. For example, if you’re a small business owner who has a contract with the federal government, we’re going to make sure you get paid a lot faster than you do now. We’re also planning to cut away the red tape that prevents too many rapidly-growing start-up companies from raising capital and going public. And to help responsible homeowners, we’re going to work with Federal housing agencies to help more people refinance their mortgages at interest rates that are now near 4% — a step that can put more than $2,000 a year in a family’s pocket, and give a lift to an economy still burdened by the drop in housing prices.

Other steps will require Congressional action. Today you passed reform that will speed up the outdated patent process, so that entrepreneurs can turn a new idea into a new business as quickly as possible. That’s the kind of action we need. Now it’s time to clear the way for a series of trade agreements that would make it easier for American companies to sell their products in Panama, Colombia, and South Korea – while also helping the workers whose jobs have been affected by global competition. If Americans can buy Kias and Hyundais, I want to see folks in South Korea driving Fords and Chevys and Chryslers. I want to see more products sold around the world stamped with three proud words: “Made in America.”

And on all of our efforts to strengthen competitiveness, we need to look for ways to work side-by-side with America’s businesses. That’s why I’ve brought together a Jobs Council of leaders from different industries who are developing a wide range of new ideas to help companies grow and create jobs.

Already, we’ve mobilized business leaders to train 10,000 American engineers a year, by providing company internships and training. Other businesses are covering tuition for workers who learn new skills at community colleges. And we’re going to make sure the next generation of manufacturing takes root not in China or Europe, but right here, in the United States of America. If we provide the right incentives and support – and if we make sure our trading partners play by the rules – we can be the ones to build everything from fuel-efficient cars to advanced biofuels to semiconductors that are sold all over the world. That’s how America can be number one again. That’s how America will be number one again.

Now, I realize that some of you have a different theory on how to grow the economy. Some of you sincerely believe that the only solution to our economic challenges is to simply cut most government spending and eliminate most government regulations.

Well, I agree that we can’t afford wasteful spending, and I will continue to work with Congress to get rid of it. And I agree that there are some rules and regulations that put an unnecessary burden on businesses at a time when they can least afford it. That’s why I ordered a review of all government regulations. So far, we’ve identified over 500 reforms, which will save billions of dollars over the next few years. We should have no more regulation than the health, safety, and security of the American people require. Every rule should meet that common sense test.

But what we can’t do – what I won’t do – is let this economic crisis be used as an excuse to wipe out the basic protections that Americans have counted on for decades. I reject the idea that we need to ask people to choose between their jobs and their safety. I reject the argument that says for the economy to grow, we have to roll back protections that ban hidden fees by credit card companies, or rules that keep our kids from being exposed to mercury, or laws that prevent the health insurance industry from shortchanging patients. I reject the idea that we have to strip away collective bargaining rights to compete in a global economy. We shouldn’t be in a race to the bottom, where we try to offer the cheapest labor and the worst pollution standards. America should be in a race to the top. And I believe that’s a race we can win.

In fact, this larger notion that the only thing we can do to restore prosperity is just dismantle government, refund everyone’s money, let everyone write their own rules, and tell everyone they’re on their own – that’s not who we are. That’s not the story of America.

Yes, we are rugged individualists. Yes, we are strong and self-reliant. And it has been the drive and initiative of our workers and entrepreneurs that has made this economy the engine and envy of the world.

But there has always been another thread running throughout our history – a belief that we are all connected; and that there are some things we can only do together, as a nation.

We all remember Abraham Lincoln as the leader who saved our Union. But in the middle of a Civil War, he was also a leader who looked to the future – a Republican president who mobilized government to build the transcontinental railroad; launch the National Academy of Sciences; and set up the first land grant colleges. And leaders of both parties have followed the example he set.

Ask yourselves – where would we be right now if the people who sat here before us decided not to build our highways and our bridges; our dams and our airports? What would this country be like if we had chosen not to spend money on public high schools, or research universities, or community colleges? Millions of returning heroes, including my grandfather, had the opportunity to go to school because of the GI Bill. Where would we be if they hadn’t had that chance?

How many jobs would it have cost us if past Congresses decided not to support the basic research that led to the Internet and the computer chip? What kind of country would this be if this Chamber had voted down Social Security or Medicare just because it violated some rigid idea about what government could or could not do? How many Americans would have suffered as a result?

No single individual built America on their own. We built it together. We have been, and always will be, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all; a nation with responsibilities to ourselves and with responsibilities to one another. Members of Congress, it is time for us to meet our responsibilities.

Every proposal I’ve laid out tonight is the kind that’s been supported by Democrats and Republicans in the past. Every proposal I’ve laid out tonight will be paid for. And every proposal is designed to meet the urgent needs of our people and our communities.

I know there’s been a lot of skepticism about whether the politics of the moment will allow us to pass this jobs plan – or any jobs plan. Already, we’re seeing the same old press releases and tweets flying back and forth. Already, the media has proclaimed that it’s impossible to bridge our differences. And maybe some of you have decided that those differences are so great that we can only resolve them at the ballot box.

But know this: the next election is fourteen months away. And the people who sent us here – the people who hired us to work for them – they don’t have the luxury of waiting fourteen months. Some of them are living week to week; paycheck to paycheck; even day to day. They need help, and they need it now.

I don’t pretend that this plan will solve all our problems. It shouldn’t be, nor will it be, the last plan of action we propose. What’s guided us from the start of this crisis hasn’t been the search for a silver bullet. It’s been a commitment to stay at it – to be persistent – to keep trying every new idea that works, and listen to every good proposal, no matter which party comes up with it.

Regardless of the arguments we’ve had in the past, regardless of the arguments we’ll have in the future, this plan is the right thing to do right now. You should pass it. And I intend to take that message to every corner of this country. I also ask every American who agrees to lift your voice and tell the people who are gathered here tonight that you want action now. Tell Washington that doing nothing is not an option. Remind us that if we act as one nation, and one people, we have it within our power to meet this challenge.

President Kennedy once said, “Our problems are man-made – therefore they can be solved by man. And man can be as big as he wants.”

These are difficult years for our country. But we are Americans. We are tougher than the times that we live in, and we are bigger than our politics have been. So let’s meet the moment. Let’s get to work, and show the world once again why the United States of America remains the greatest nation on Earth. Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.

Read full story · Comments { 7 }

Obama’s ‘American Jobs Act’: It’s Bipartisan!

Pres. Obama’s speech streaming live at 7 pm EST.

[...] Steve Bell, senior director of the bipartisan Economic Policy Project, said Wednesday that the scope of the plan is too small. “It doesn’t even sound good,” he said, arguing instead for a $640 billion, 12-month payroll tax holiday for employers and employees. … – White House: Obama’s ‘American Jobs Act’ will include new ideas

Yesterday when Sen. Harry Reid’s office tweeted that Pres. Obama’s jobs pitch was bipartisan, challenging Republicans to get on board, it seemed obvious what would be next.

From the Atlantic’s Chris Frates, the White House talking points, which you’ll hear regurgitated by Democratic surrogates on cable all day.

The American Jobs Act is:

– based on bi-partisan ideas;

– it is fully paid for by closing corporate tax loopholes and asking the wealthiest Americans to pay their fair share; and

– it will have an impact on job and economic growth NOW — just as soon as Congress acts.

– Every day, people in this country are working hard to meet their responsibilities. The question now is whether Washington will meet theirs.

– The time for obstruction and gridlock is over. Congress needs to put country ahead of politics.

– The American people know that the economic crisis and the deep recession weren’t created overnight and won’t be solved overnight. The economic security of the American middle class has been under attack for decades.

– That’s why President Obama believes we need to do more than just recover from this economic crisis.

– The President is rebuilding the economy the American way — based on balance, fairness and the same set of rules for everyone from Wall Street to Main Street where hard work and responsibility pay and gaming the system is penalized.

– It’s an American economy that’s built to last and creates the jobs of the future, by forcing Washington to live within its means so we can invest in small business entrepreneurs, education, and making things the world buys, not outsourcing, loopholes and reckless financial deals that put middle class security at risk.

Convinced?

Me neither.

TM Note: I’ll be online tonight, while doing political analysis of the speech and its practical impact for the Dow Jones/Wall Street Journal Digital Network team.

Read full story · Comments { 16 }

Rick Perry’s Thug Politics

**UPDATED**

Pictures sometimes don’t require a script.

Things reportedly got testy during a commercial break, when Rick Perry confronted Ron Paul.

I don’t know about Ron Paul, though I’m certain his supporters will go nuclear over this one, but when a man puts his hands on another man, pointing a finger in his face for emphasis, that’s a point when things have crossed the line.

From IBT:

This time, things got physical.

During a commercial break, Perry walked up to Paul’s podium, physically grabbed Paul’s wrist, and pointed at Paul’s face with his other hand …

…and the Romney campaign thought calling Social Security a “ponzi scheme” was a gift.

UPDATE: “Force vs. Reason,” compliments of RonPaul.com:

During a commercial break at Wednesday’s Republican debate, Rick Perry and Ron Paul continued their spirited exchange on stage. Suddenly, Perry grabbed Ron Paul’s forearm while aggressively pointing his index finger towards the Congressman’s face. Alerted by Perry’s menacing gestures, Ron Paul’s bodyguard (front left) was standing by, ready to protect the Congressman.

Read full story · Comments { 21 }

10 Years After 9/11, Afghanistan Is No Longer Our Fight

Kudos to Joe Scarborough for taking the risk, stepping out and releasing this song (video below), “Reason to Believe.”

When I look at Democratic actions to withdraw troops from Afghanistan, I see Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand asking for a quicker timeline, but that’s hardly enough. As a new generation leader and a woman, why isn’t she demanding a full withdrawal immediately? Her timidity represents continued establishment-tied status quo in many ways.

Why won’t Democrats lead the way to get out of Afghanistan?

With SecDef Leon Panetta wanting to stay in Iraq, with Pres. Obama’s Libya regime change policy juxtaposed against Syria’s bloodletting and our inability to respond, there is nothing from Democrats that inspires on the foreign policy front.

See Somalia and the reports from Jeremy Scahill.

I supported Obama’s actions in Afghanistan at first, because Bush allowed the country to spin while our Iraq misadventure manifested regime change. Because I believed soft power delivered through Secy. Clinton could make a difference, which it has. However, once McChrystal imploded in Rolling Stone it was obvious it was over.

How many more men and women have to pay the ultimate price 10 years after 9/11 for a war that is unwinnable by any measurable standards?

We don’t seem to ever learn.

That people continue to support politicians who haven’t either is at the heart of America’s decline.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Read full story · Comments { 8 }

Romney Scores Big:

21st Century Man v. 20th Century Tough Guy

“The issue in the book ‘Fed Up,’ governor, is you say that by any measure, Social Security is a failure,” Romney said. “Our nominee has to be someone who isn’t committed to abolishing Social Security, but who is committed to saving Social Security … I will make sure that we keep the program and we make it financially secure, and under no circumstances would I ever say by any measure it’s a failure.” – Fireworks between Perry and Romney erupt early in debate

Rick Perry failed über Reaganite Peggy Noonan’s basic GOP nomination test: Can you think about watching Perry “for 4 years and it would not make me throw up in my mouth”?

You simply cannot tell Americans, Perry speaking mostly to young people, that Social Security is a ponzi scheme over and over again without comforting middle class voters and seniors, who vote in droves, that the program won’t be threatened in their lifetime.

That Romney made Perry look small, mean and cranky was another problem.

Somehow I just kept wondering if we were watching Mitt Romney’s alter ego in Rick Perry, the Fonzerelli of his soul. A man who has every attribute Mitt doesn’t, but in the long rough road times ahead, his snarling, muscular machismo sets off alarms and urges you to unleash the dogs… on him.

At one point, after Rick “ponzi” Perry doubled down on Social Security stupid, he was asked a question, turning to the camera for his close up, which fell flatly on the subsequent silence. It revealed nervousness unbecoming a national presidential candidate.

But Mr. Perry’s preening sadism over a state slogan that basically screams WE EXECUTE PEOPLE should surely shock anyone over at GOP central who wants to beat Pres. Obama.

It’s over.

Say goodnight, Rick.

I had little doubt he’d implode, but tonight’s debate was a bonanza of kaboom. From ponzi politics to salivating over throwing the switch, to some weirdness about climate change, Perry proved unready for primetime.

Karl Rove can breathe a little easier.

…and those fat cat GOP donor hold-outs can finally rev up their anti-Perry PACS, because now it’s clear Perry’s a goner in a general election.

Meanwhile, Mitt Romney was sharp, direct and pushed the visionary envelope, through the economics he believes will work (it won’t – see Bush, whose people wrote Romney’s plan).

Romney was also presidential.

Perry’s curled-lip sourness didn’t match up next to Mitt Romney who exuded certain belief, knowledge that he is the president already. That Romney was also almost relaxed while revealing passion and expertise was a first for him since he started running for president six years ago.

Gov. Perry is out of a time Republicans cannot afford to revisit if they want to win the White House, which is closer to being possible than they ever dreamed.

Mitt Romney commanded the stage, was gracious when asked for criticism, sounded like he at least understood the U.S. economy, even if his answers haven’t worked for workers, as much as the stockholders.

The United States, all of us, are going up against an economic whirlwind that will leave the unprepared behind. This means eduction, innovation and investment. It also means at some point our juvenile but brilliant country has to choose to pull together on some things. There are just some issues where we all have to agree to the floor, like science and evolution, yes, and climate change, but also that we’re going to care for the most vulnerable and aged.

We’re doomed as a people if we don’t.

Surely Republicans understand this or at least understand that marketing anything less to voters won’t cut it in challenging economic times.

Read full story · Comments { 21 }

Al Gore Confronts Disappointment with Obama

From former V.P. Al Gore:

Instead of relying on science, President Obama appears to have bowed to pressure from polluters who did not want to bear the cost of implementing new restrictions on their harmful pollution—even though economists have shown that the US economy would benefit from the job creating investments associated with implementing the new technology. The result of the White House’s action will be increased medical bills for seniors with lung disease, more children developing asthma, and the continued degradation of our air quality.

Science is like truth, you can’t escape the facts at the foundation, which begins with Pres. Obama, but also his chief of staff Bill Daley and Cass Sunstein.

Pres. George W. Bush did the same thing to Christie Todd Whitman when she ran the EPA. Obama knee-capped Lisa Jackson in the same way.

Confront that disappointment and what you’ll find is it matters little whether a Democrat or a Republican is in the White House.

Read full story · Comments { 5 }

Reagan Library Debate: Perry – Romney & Company

It starts at 8 pm eastern time. Should be interesting.

All eyes are on Perry’s debut, but Romney can’t sit back like a potted plant.

We’ll also see if Bachmann and Paul target Perry, with how he handles it one element.

Everyone’s expecting something big. I’m hoping for some entertainment.

Read full story · Comments { 16 }

Team Obama Yearns to Recapture 2008 ‘Spirit’

He is frustrated — particularly at Republicans on Capitol Hill, but also at some of his own aides, according to people who have spoken to him recently — that he has been unable to rise above the morass of Washington and recapture the spirit that helped him win election. – Jeff Zeleny

Pres. Obama’s “job speech” isn’t going to be a “jobs speech” at all. It’s a competing rhetorical gambit in a week where Republicans are debating who should take him on in 2012. Zeleny proves it by one line he wrote today. Team Obama wants to “recapture the spirit that helped him win election.”

Could anything be more gauzy, less tangible, void of purpose, while also revealing the central lack of vision element of Obama’s presidency?

Segue to one line in Bloomberg’s report on Obama’s so called “jobs speech”: Almost half the stimulus would come from tax cuts…

Team Obama will never capture the 2008 “spirit” that elected Barack Obama, because people now know it was predicated on a marketing myth. People now know there was nothing behind the “spirit” but emotions tied to fan politics, which Obama can only hope will turn to practical “lesser of two evils” voting once the Republicans have a nominee.

Sure people still like the guy, but the question, Is this all there is?, has now been answered unequivocally.

Oh, and promises won’t work anymore, because Pres. Obama’s gone one to many times to the tool-less word workshop.

Zeleny gets the coveted White House access, but the quote he gets from David Axelrod is one for the books:

“If this is just a referendum on economic conditions, then any incumbent is going to struggle with that, but it’s not just that. It’s a contest about what to do about it,” said David Axelrod, the chief strategist to the president’s re-election campaign. “I’d be more worried if I saw some compelling new argument for how to lead the country, but these guys are carrying the same old water.”

Speaking of “same old water,” let’s consider what Politico calls the “two central measures” to be included in Obama’s “jobs package.”

The two central measures in the Obama jobs package are expected to be a one-year extension of the payroll tax cut and an extension of expiring jobless benefits, according to the AP. Those two initiatives would total around $170 billion.

These two initiatives are the very definition of “same old water,” even though they’re both needed and important. David Dayen has more.

What’s new in Obama’s “jobs package”? A “public works projects will be included, but the AP reports that this will be less than $50 billion of the package.” I guess that’s something, but get out the crayon labeled “puny” to color me unimpressed.

Woven into this discussion is the little mentioned “deficit reduction” side of the package. Shorter: tinkering with some part of entitlements. See Ezra Klein:

Getting less attention in the media is the follow-up speech the White House is planning, which will lay out a specific deficit-reduction agenda that not only meets the $1.5 trillion goal of the “supercommittee,” but exceeds it and pays for the new jobs spending. These proposals will look quite similar to the grand bargain the White House offered Speaker John Boehner, and liberal groups are grimly preparing for the administration to call for raising the Medicare eligibility age.

Whatever “spirit” Team Obama is trying to recapture isn’t going to be done by doing paltry things being floated in the media, while Bill Daley negotiates with Obama’s corporate friends to gut the EPA, as candidate Obama panders to labor and his Democratic base as he moves to change entitlements, all of which is about appeasing Independents int he hopes of being reelected while standing for absolutely nothing.

Read full story · Comments { 22 }