TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Archive | October, 2011

Mayor Bloomberg Gets a Clue

From the Wall Street Journal: Bloomberg: Occupy Wall Street Can Stay Indefinitely.

“The bottom line is – people want to express themselves. And as long as they obey the laws, we’ll allow them to,” said Bloomberg as he prepared to march in the Columbus Day Parade on Fifth Avenue. “If they break the laws, then, we’re going to do what we’re supposed to do: enforce the laws.”

Meanwhile, the right has turned to Tumblr to try to stop the momentum of the “We are the 99 percent,” which has gone viral.

Conservative activists have created a Tumblr called “We are the 53 percent” that’s meant to be a counterpunch to the viral “We are the 99 percent” site that’s become a prominent symbol for the Occupy Wall Street movement. The Tumblr is supposed to represent the 53 percent of Americans who pay federal income taxes, and its assumption is that the Wall Street protesters are part of the 46 percent of the country who don’t. “We are the 53 percent” was originally the brainchild of Erick Erickson, founder of RedState.org, who worked together with Josh Trevino, communications director for the right-leaning Texas Public Policy Foundation, and conservative filmmaker Mike Wilson to develop the concept, according to Trevino.

Tomorrow’s Republican debate ought to be choice. Wonder how they’ll handle what’s going on all over the country?

Read full story · Comments { 11 }

Liberally Independent: Occupy and “Class Warfare,” October 10

Joyce L. Arnold: Liberal, lesbian, Independent, equality activist, writer. At TaylorMarsh: Liberally Independent, including the Two Parties series, and Queer Talk

This daily update regarding Occupy, as I wrote in yesterday’s initial post, will provide links to new information and developments, as well as to analyses from various sources reflecting, or reflecting on, the grassroots side of things, mostly. The updates will by necessity be selective. There is a rapidly expanding amount of attention being given the whole Occupy movement (as some are now calling it), and of course, what’s coming from internal to Occupy is also growing. So what I can do here is cursory. Of course, I won’t be able to resist a bit of commentary and analysis along the way.

First, OccupyWallSt is the primary stop, as is Occupy Wall Street Press. One story is from someone who identifies as a former tea partier:

You may not believe me, but I want your movement to succeed. From a former tea partier to you, young new rebels, there’s some advice to prevent what happened to our now broken movement from happening to you. I don’t agree with everything your movement does, but I sympathize with your cause and agree on our common enemy.

I check Occupy Together out several times a day, to watch the numbers grow. As of about 4:00 PM EST, the total number of cities registered where Occupy related actions and meetups are happening was 1209.

At Truthout, William Rivers Pitt provides one take on how Occupy is being seen, in Bank On It: They’re Scared, citing an internal bank memo.

It’s a movement now.

And they’re scared.

… I know because a friend in San Francisco took the time to transcribe a document he was given by the major bank he works for. The document, titled ‘Protest Safety Handbook,’ explains what a bank employee should do when confronted with the horror and terror of an OWS protest.
I am leaving the name of the bank out of this to protect my friend. Some tidbits: …

‘These types of groups are reaching out to the disengaged and disenfranchised population of the United States for members, often encouraging the unemployed and homeless to join the movement. … While this group has not yet resorted to violence the possibility exists that they can.’

What follows is a rather lengthy “Safety Tips” list of what to do if you have to go anywhere near the “disengaged and disenfranchised” group, including avoiding poorly lit areas, avoiding wearing Bank ID in public, and keeping your cell phone with you, charged and pre-set with emergency numbers.

Which sounds kind of silly, but when you consider the “class warfare” language being used, it might become a bit less ridiculous. Sure, this is a scare tactic, but it’s also a classic Us and Them division. Maybe the DC Electeds are feeling neglected – the people are suppose to pay attention to them, not each other. Or maybe it’s just their continuing inability / unwillingness to understand what’s happening. Or maybe, they do “get” – if in top down kind of way – that what’s happening with Occupy and beyond actually is about “class” and a kind of “warfare.” And it scares them sillier than usual.

From Rob Kall at OpEdNews:

Herman Cain says Occupy Wall Street protests should go to the White House. Willy Geist on Morning Joe says ‘I’m glad to see it’s moving to Washington,’ referring to the frustration that’s being manifested on the streets. …

Cain and Geist don’t get the Occupy Wall Street movement because it is anything but about Washington. One thing that’s become clear to me … is that people no longer have faith in elected officials. … The members of the Occupy communities see the Occupy movement as an alternative, as an extra-legislative approach to making change happen. …

… it seems to me that the true power of the Occupy movement is not at the Wall Street Location, not at the Washington DC Freedom Plaza or McPherson Square locations. They are important, but the real power of the Occupy movement is in the burgeoning explosion of Occupy communities that are happening locally … not in the big cities where protests usually happen. …

There has been a class war going on, against the middle class, for at least a decade, probably more like 20 or 30 years. It’s a bi-partisan war that many Democrats are also enabling, as well as Republicans. …
When people like Eric Cantor suggest that Obama or Occupy Wall Street people are engaging in class warfare, he’s right. To suggest that they started it is totally dishonest. They are fighting back against the forces Cantor represents — corporatist forces.

A similar take from Al Jazeera’s Heather Parton, The class warfare the rich don’t understand, in which she writes about the build-up to the current Occupy moment:

It started early on in the crisis, when Jake de Santis an executive for the bailed out too big to fail insurance company AIG took to the pages of the New York Times to complain that he was being treated unfairly … .

Since then we have been treated to regular scoldings from the masters of the universe … . JP Morgan Chase chairman Jamie Dimon famously declared, ‘When I hear the constant vilification of corporate America, I personally don’t understand it.

Of course he doesn’t. He has no clue about the grassroots, real world experience of the “99%”. Parton cites the more recent class warfare charges specific to Occupy, then writes:

It’s easy to make light of all this – they are just that silly. But the truth is that in the age of Citizens United, these complaints carry a great deal of weight with both political parties.
It’s too soon to know if the nascent Occupy Wall Street movement will grow or if it will have staying power. … But the focus on Wall Street alone should be enough to make the 1 per cent take pause and question their assumptions. …

Is this a class war? Yes, probably. … in this latest battle, there’s little doubt who fired the first shot. When the financial crisis hit, the Masters of the Universe evaded responsibility and defiantly demanded more sacrifice from their victims. They enlisted their favoured politicians to hold the people hostage and then complained about being unloved despite their crimes. They have won all the early skirmishes – but the people are gathering their forces and starting to fight back.

One of the interesting, and helpful, things happening now is a lot more attention not just to the Occupiers, but to the analyses and commentaries and cries for attention and help that have been widely ignored for years. Or decades.

Assuming timing allows, tomorrow I’ll start looking at some of what’s happening in those 1207-and-growing cities and towns. If you know of local happenings, please jump in. We can have our own little version of Occupy.

( Photo via Common Dreams )

Read full story · Comments { 4 }

Elizabeth Warren Raises $3.15m, Twice Brown’s Figure

From The Hill:

Elizabeth Warren raised more than $3 million in a little more than six weeks to fund her Senate bid in Massachusetts — more than twice the figure pulled in by incumbent Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.).

Warren pulled in $3.15 million in total for the third quarter, with more than 11,000 people in Massachusetts pitching in, her campaign announced Monday. Brown raised $1.55 million — almost exactly half of Warren’s total. But Brown, who wielded a hefty war chest heading into his reelection campaign, now has more than $10 million in the bank.

But Sen. Brown has $10 million in the bank and Warren’s astounding number will bring in the hordes to help.

It’s a great start for Warren.

Read full story · Comments { 6 }

Are You Ready for Rick Perry 2.0?

Tying Obamacare to Mitt Romney may work in the primaries. However, Perry’s still got his immigration problem with right wing primary voters, though it might could Obama trouble in the west in the general election, Perry can undo the damage he’s done to his candidacy.

But clearly, with another debate coming up, Perry’s been retooling fast.

The first part of the plan? Get more sleep:

And as he prepares for two more debates in the next nine days, along with his first major policy address, his advisers have devised another way to help: requiring Mr. Perry to get more sleep.

Obviously, Romney won’t let Perry get back into the race without a fight.

Romney camp labels Perry a ‘desperate candidate’

“Rick Perry is a desperate candidate who will say and do anything to prop up his sinking campaign,” Gail Gitcho, Romney’s communications director, said in a statement. “In trying to deflect attention from his liberal in-state tuition policy for illegal immigrants, he has restored to repeated dishonesty, distortions and fabrications about Mitt Romney.”

If this hilarity wasn’t enough, Joe the Plumber has reportedly file papers to run for Congress.

Read full story · Comments { 0 }

Who Owns Occupy Wall Street?

ABC News has an interesting headline I’ve been waiting to see: Democrats Seek to Own ‘Occupy Wall Street’ Movement. The video at ABC pits Rep. Eric Cantor’s caterwauling against Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s approval of what’s going on. As for Paul Ryan, his “redistribution” talking point never fell so flat.

The patriotic Americans demanding our democratic republic undergo an evaluation long overdue don’t belong to the Democratic or the Republican contingents in this country. They’re protesting because of the concentrated wealth that has become a political machine used to starve economic equality for all, with both parties culpable, while the money men and women on Wall Street gamble and commit possible crimes on which they skate. Crimes that none of us could get away with committing without jail time.

It’s actually quite unfortunate that Democrats haven’t owned this issue before OWS manifest.

It’s the Democratic Party who once represented the average man and woman, but who a long time ago ceded what they stood for to Republicans, who simply marketed a means to get people to vote against their own interests, which worked. Rush Limbaugh and right wing radio has the most to do with manifesting this connection, which just maybe the OWS protests can begin to dislodge.

Today, Pres. Obama is seen as out of touch and part of the problem. That’s unfortunate, too, considering his community activism should have long ago taught him the power of the people and what it means when a politician has our back.

TM NOTE: Every day at 5 pm est, Joyce Arnold will be running daily columns of the grass roots side of Occupy Wall Street. Meet you here at 5!

Read full story · Comments { 10 }

Emails from ‘Christian Conservatives’ Begin: ‘Mitt Romney Belongs to a Cult’

The “Values Voters” Summit hit Washington this weekend and the religious bigotry hit the fan along with it. Politico runs down the whole sorry faith competition that’s erupted inside the Republican right.

Texas evangelical leader Robert Jeffress, the megachurch pastor who introduced Rick Perry at the Values Voter Summit, said . . . he does not believe Mitt Romney is a Christian.

Jeffress described Romney’s Mormon faith as a “cult” and said evangelicals had only one real option in the 2012 primaries.

“That is a mainstream view, that Mormonism is a cult,” Jeffress told reporters here. “Every true, born-again follower of Christ ought to embrace a Christian over a non-Christian.”

Asked by Politico if he believed Romney is a Christian, Jeffress answered: “No.”

The Christian leader warned that in a general-election race between Romney and Obama, he believes many evangelicals will stay home and leave the GOP nominee without their votes.

Jeffress said that he himself would vote for Romney.

He also said that he had not spoken with Perry about his views on Romney’s faith and was “in no way speaking for him.”

What’s happening to Mitt Romney is reminiscent of what Barack Obama went through when rumors about his religion became fodder for email smear campaigns. Romney’s people are hitting back hard at Rick Perry, with a supporter of his, Robert Jeffress, starting the brawl. The difference is that Obama is not a Muslim, while Romney is a Mormon. What the hateful screeds have in common is exalting anyone’s religion over another in a political race that shouldn’t be about anyone’s personal religious faith.

It’s simply un-American to pit one religion against another in a quest for the presidency.

Taking off on what Robert Jeffress has said, emails about Mitt Romney’s religion have begun slamming my email inbox, the latest under the subject heading: Mormon Bishop’s Daughter Agrees With Jeffress, Mitt Romney Belongs To A Cult. It’s from a woman named Kay Bell who is pimping an alleged Mormon Bishop’s daughter, who evidently agrees with Jeffress.

Kay Bell, in her email, is trumpeting Tricia Erikison’s writing, which has at its heart a despicable premise: Can Mitt Romney Serve Two Masters? The Mormon Church Versus The Office Of The Presidency of the United States Of America.

Mormonism is a religion to which I became exposed when I met my husband, a recovering Mormon. As old timers around here know, I also had a head on collision with the tech team taking care of my site at the time when they took it upon themselves to alter links in a piece about Mormonism I did many years ago. Back in 2007, “Censored by Two Mormons” revealed the lengths two people of that faith would go when anyone writes about the intricacies of it.

Personally, I cannot relate at all to Mormonism. But I have the same problem with Catholicism that depends on a pope to connect with God, not to mention the misogyny embedded in this faith. However, I wouldn’t genuflect to my husband either, which is what Southern Baptists believe, while other alleged Christian churches won’t acknowledge the civil rights of gays. The notion that only men are worthy to lead any church is something I reject out of hand, which is why I’m a rebel Episcopalian. What brought me to that religion was a female reverend who once guided it (All Saints Parish in Beverly Hills), my bond solidified when I met and heard speak Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori, the first bishop ever of the Episcopal church, though now I make daily meditations my connection to our intelligent universe.

Religious zealots of any religion, especially the bigoted version from wherever it rises, have a lot in common, whether they’re Mormons, evangelical Christians or Muslims.

A candidate’s religion and his faith has no place in U.S. politics. But you can thank Ronald Reagan for giving “Christian conservatives” like Kay Bell power they haven’t earned and don’t deserve.

Below is a snippet of just one of the emails I have received. It’s despicable.

It also proves that Mitt Romney, if he’s going to win the Republican nomination, just may have to do his version of J.F.K.’s religion speech and reach out to the crazies in his party if he is to prevail.

According to the Random House dictionary, a cult is a particular system of religious worship, esp. with reference to its rites and ceremonies; a group or false sect bound together by veneration of the same thing, person, ideal, etc; a religion or sect considered to be, unorthodox, or extremist, with members often living outside of conventional society under the direction of a charismatic leader; the members of such a religion or sect.

Let us break down each section of the definition of a cult, as it relates to the religion of Mormonism:
“A particular system of religious worship, exp. With reference to its rites and ceremonies;”:
Mitt Romney has participated in the secret Mormon Temple ceremonies throughout most of his life. In these ceremonies, he has

• made physical signs of slashing his throat by placing his right thumb to his left ear, dragging it around his neck to the right ear, symbolic of “suffering his life to death” if he reveals the secret blood oaths, covenants and rites he agreed to therewith.
• made physical signs of holding his right hand up, clasping a symbolic knife and taking the knife down to the left of his abdomen, violently pulling the knife to the top of his right shoulder, then holding the knife out to his right side, turning his hand downward allowing it to fall to the ground, then holding both of his arms out to the sides and bending his body forward symbolic of his guts spilling on to the ground if he revealed the secret blood oaths, covenants and rites he agreed to therewith.

There were many more frightening secret handshakes and blood oaths taken by Mitt and his wife, Ann. To see the full authentic version of the secret temple ceremonies they attended, participated in and made blood oaths in agreement to, you may go here: http://packham.n4m.org/endow84.htm. It is also important to note that these ceremonies have been changed several times due to their exposure on the internet. Mitt Romney started going through and participating in these ceremonies at the very young age of 19 as he embarked on his two year mission for the Mormon Church.

“a group or false sect bound together by veneration of the same thing, person, ideal, etc; a religion or sect considered to be, unorthodox, or extremist, with members often living outside of conventional society under the direction of a charismatic leader”
• The Mormon Church has experienced a steady succession of charismatic leader “prophets”, starting with the founder of the Mormon Church, Joseph Smith. Joseph, as the founder of this massive religion could not seem to muster even one truthful outcome of his prophecies. The second prophet of the Mormon Church, Brigham, Young, suffered the same plight. Please go here for proof of the false prophecies of the founders of the Mormon Church: http://www.irr.org/mit/wdist/false-prophecies.html.
• These same founders practiced polygamy under this Mormon principal.
• The Mormon Church to this day has a “prophet” at the head of the church. The leaders of the church are the Prophet and his two counselors, the 12 apostles and the council of the 70’s.
“the members of such a religion or sect”
• Mitt Romney is a member of such a religion or sect.

The most outrageous fact the media is not bringing to the American people is the reality that Mitt Romney truly believes that when he dies, if he has kept his blood oaths and covenants to the Mormon Church, he will become a literal GOD in his next life. He also believes that he will be given his very own planet/kingdom in which he will call his wife, Ann, into by her secret name given to Mitt in the temple ceremony. On Mitt’s planet, he and Ann will have relations to populate it with spirit children.

Mitt Romney has sworn in the secret Mormon Temple Ceremonies to the Law of Consecration: “to consecrate yourselves, your time, talents, and everything with which the Lord has blessed you, or with which he may bless you, to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, for the building up of the Kingdom of God on earth and for the establishment of Zion.”

This is extremely important because if Mitt Romney absolutely must obey the religion of Mormonism and the Prophets of the Mormon Church first, before his allegiance to our country. His very eternal exaltation to godhood depends on it.

Furthermore, the Mormon Church teaches that the Kingdom and Government of God will be enacted from the Garden of Eden, located in Jackson County Missouri. Mormon Prophet Bruce McConkie stated “During the millennium the church will have the rule and the government of the world given to it”.

I think we can all agree that it is important that the leader of the free world possesses the ability to discern fact from fiction. Otherwise, if he has lived a life of deception, we can conclude that he will continue to be deceived and that his judgment may be distorted. Because the wisdom, judgment and discernment of our President may be crucial to our survival, would it not be prudent to examine his fundamental foundation and beliefs? And if his beliefs are distorted, why would it not be critical to our existence to protect our country from being placed in the hands of such a person?

Read full story · Comments { 8 }

Liberally Independent: Occupy and Imagine, October 9

Joyce L. Arnold: Liberal, lesbian, Independent, equality activist, writer. At TaylorMarsh: Liberally Independent, including the Two Parties series, and Queer Talk

In regular “Occupy” posts, I’ll provide updates of developments regarding Occupy Wall Street, which has gone well beyond Manhattan, and the U.S. Mostly it will be by way of links and highlights, though this initial post will provide a kind of “round-up,” and so is longer.

OWS, and the bigger movement it’s sparked, could fall apart for any number of reasons, including because there are some powerful people who do not want this to be successful. It could be co-opted – I’ve seen the “Serious People” arguments that it’s time for the grown-ups to step in and bring some expertise and “organization.” It could fall apart.

Or not. It could continue growing, evolving, spreading. That some of the “Serious People” don’t get what’s happening just might be one of the best indications that Occupy, which has already created room for conversation not provided by the “Serious People,” including MSM, will play a very significant role in bringing about real change.

Even the NYTimes is noticing that conversation. Protest Spurs Online Dialogue on Inequity:

What began as a small group of protesters expressing their grievances about economic inequities last month from a park in New York City has evolved into an online conversation that is spreading across the country on social media platforms.

… more than 200 Facebook pages and Twitter accounts have sprung up in dozens of cities during the past week … .

Some 900 events have been set up on Meetup.com, and blog posts and photographs from all over the country are popping up on the WeArethe99Percent blog on Tumblr from people who see themselves as victims of not just a sagging economy but also economic injustice.

One of the best places to find current information is at Occupy Together. At about noon today, the number of cities in which some Occupy related actions are occurring / scheduled was at 1099.

OccupyWallSt points to growth just in NYC:

Liberty Square has grown exponentially over the last three weeks. It is time to form a second General Assembly in Manhattan. We expect more to follow.

The Occupy Wall Street Press is up and publishing. Today’s reporting included:

Last week two assholes were caught on video at Occupy Wall Street saying profoundly awful, stupid things about Jews, one of whom was consistently heckled and challenged by those around him.

On Friday night, around one thousand … Jews assembled for Yom Kippur services in the very same place to express solidarity with the demonstrators’ shared ideal of repairing the world. …

Stay up-to-date about radical Jewish happenings at occupations in your local community. Follow @occupyjudaism or like us on Facebook.

Via AlterNet, there’s also “Occupy the Hood”: Black Protesters Start Chapter to Educate, Diversify OWS:

This week, Colorlines reported on the top six American cities in which blacks and Latinos are living in poverty that rivals that of the Great Depression. If there was ever a time to rebel against Wall Street, it’s now. Yet many have observed that the OWS proceedings have been largely white, or at the very least devoid of the kind of diversity that makes New York City great. Now, two Queens men hope to change that by starting Occupy the Hood—a solidarity group that means to educate poor blacks and Latinos as to why a successful OWS will have the most significant impact on their communities.

And then there’s this from Gay City News Queer Voices in Zuccotti Park:

The banks might still be too big to fail, but the protests against them have become too big not to notice. …

And in the midst of it all, gay voices were present, too, putting LGBT issues into the broader context of opposition to corporate greed and unchecked Wall Street power.

The organizing at OWS includes the People’s Library. You can check it out here. The collection includes a Children’s Books section.

There’s an Occupy America site at flickr, where you can read posts by individuals from around the nation, as well as see photos, posters, etc. One post, by WilliamBanzai7, concludes:

The sooner we all stand up and openly say enough is finally enough, the better we will all be.

Via AlterNet, Sarah Jaffe cites the NYTimes article I mention above:

‘As the Occupy Wall Street protests spread from Lower Manhattan to Washington and other cities, the chattering classes keep complaining that the marchers lack a clear message and specific policy prescriptions.

The message — and the solutions — should be obvious to anyone who has been paying attention since the economy went into a recession that continues to sock the middle class while the rich have recovered and prospered. The problem is that no one in Washington has been listening.’

(Jaffe writes) That’s not an op-ed contributor to the U.S.’s paper of record – it’s the official editorial page, coming down solidly on the side of the ‘99%,’ the protesters … .

In that NYT piece, Jennifer Preston writes:

Mark Ghuneim, founder and chief executive officer of Trendrr, said the (OWS related) Twitter conversation was producing an average of 10,000 to 15,000 posts an hour on Friday about Occupy Wall Street ….

‘The conversation for this has a strong and steady heartbeat that is spreading. We’re seeing the national dialogue morph into pockets of local and topic-based conversation.’ …

The protests, though, are more than a youth uprising. The protesters’ own problems are only one illustration of the ways in which the economy is not working for most Americans.

Another good source for OWS news is, Al Jazeera. From US activists have lost trust in politicians:

… the protesters are not focused on the US’ traditional political system or politicians.

‘We need to dictate the policy up, not policy being dictated down,’ Jesse LaGreca, a protester on Wall Street, told Al Jazeera.

‘We will be the leaders, and if there’s any politicians who wanna support us in passing policies that we support, then that’s the best we (sic) to about gaining our support.’ Katie Davison, another Wall Street protester, agreed.

‘A candidate is sort of the old way of doing things,’ she said. ‘We’re looking for a new way of doing things that is more participatory and more meaningful. What that looks like we’re still figuring out.’

What a concept – change the focus, and look to “the people” to set the agenda; and be willing to say, “we’re still figuring out” how things will work and look, rather than pretending to have all the answers, and that they are THE answers.
OWS is a start, not a finish. It’s a very good start, more successful than Corporate USA, including the DC Electeds, ever imagined could happen.

On this date, October 9, when John Lennon was born, 71 years ago, I can’t resist: Imagine.

(Photo via Occupy Together )

Read full story · Comments { 12 }

Sunday Morning Early Bird News Round-Up

Good morning and welcome to Sunday.

On this day in history, October 9, 1967, Che Guevara was executed while attempting to incite revolution in Bolivia.

Some stories in the news that caught my eye:

~From Tahrir Square in Egypt to Occupy Wall Street in Washington Square Park- an Egyptian activist addressed the crowd yesterday.

~Senator Scott Brown continues to flail around doing damage control after his stupid remarks about Elizabeth Warren.

~Now we have 5 more reasons to hate Bank of America.

~Mitt Romney needs to brush up on foreign policy. Speaking of which, here are some of his foreign policy advisers.

~The California governor has signed the Dream Act into law.

~For the second year in a row the Obama administration has waived penalties under the Child Soldiers Protection Act as applied to certain countries that continue to use child soldiers.

~The NYT has information about a secret memo describing the administration’s legal justification for targeting American citizens such as Anwar al-Walaki for assassination abroad. Their rationales are so overly-broad that it raises questions as to whether there are any real legal limits on presidential authority when it comes to the war on terror. It would also seem that any administration is completely insulated from any judicial or congressional review of it’s policies or actions in this regard. Got democracy?

~Iraq’s leaders have decided to throw their support behind the oppressive, brutal, increasingly isolated Assad regime in Syria. Well, that’s sort of embarrassing for the U.S., isn’t it?

~A computer virus has infected the computer networks of Air Force pilots who remotely operate the Predator and Reaper drones in combat areas.

~Apparently at the conservative Values Voter Summit this weekend, hate is on the top on their list of values.

~Mitt Romney’s faith is under fire at the above-mentioned “values” summit.

~Ron Paul continues to win the ultra-conservative straw polls, which means absolutely nothing whatsoever in terms of the 2012 election.

~Republican House Armed Services Committee Chairman Buck McKeon is going to hold up the Defense Authorization bill because of language about detainee trials and the fact that he’s outraged that military chaplains can perform same sex marriages.

~Wisconsin union-busing Governor Scott Walker wants you to know his state is broke dammit! They have no money, which is what makes the story about the government spending $60,000 on iPads so strange.

~Will winning the Nobel Prize help Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf win re-election?

~Our sycophantic corporate media in action.

~The New Republic continues to provide Islamophobe Marty Peretz a platform to remind us all that yes, he in fact still doesn’t trust Arabs.

~Former Israeli peace negotiator Daniel Levy offers his take on Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu over at Foreign Policy.

~Joshua Walker has a less hysterical and more pragmatic take on Turkey’s muscular foreign policy and status as key player in all things involving the Middle East.

The End.

Read full story · Comments { 7 }

Pres. Bill Clinton on the Economy

The problem [with the Tea Party's 'government phobia'] is that there’s not a single example on the planet of a successful economy that runs on the antigovernment model.Pres. Bill Clinton

From Fortune:

The Tea Party’s government phobia

The problem is that there’s not a single example on the planet of a successful economy that runs on the antigovernment model. All the successful economies have public/private cooperation to generate economic opportunity, provide a good education, create an environment where government and the private sector work together and advance economies. The only thing I’d say to the antigovernment crowd is that we’ve got to do what works and what works is cooperation, not conflict.

Does the President have power over the economy?

Oh, quite a bit. Look at President Reagan’s policies. I give him a lot of credit for the deregulation work he did and the bipartisan resolution for the Social Security problem. But I also think that his tax cuts, which were very large, spurred economic growth in a way that wasn’t sustainable. It worked, but when the first President Bush took office, he basically got all the downside of having a deficit-spending model of generating jobs. Now, my program wouldn’t have been successful either if we hadn’t had a theory of private sector growth. I was fortunate. I became President when the information technology revolution broke out.

On paying more taxes.

No, no, I’m in favor of it because — and I don’t consider it class warfare. I mean we had — if you look at from 19 — from the end of the Second World War to about 1980, we had enough inequality to reward hard work and raw talent and creativity, and enough equality to build the world’s greatest middle class and allow poor people a reasonable chance to work their way into it.

And the distribution was the bottom 90% had 65% of the income; the top 10% had 35% of the income; the top 1% had about 9% of the income.

And those numbers have changed in the last 30 years. The 90% share has dropped from 65 to 52. The 10% share has gone from 35 to 48. The 1% share has gone from 9 to 21.

That’s a breathtaking increase in inequality, and I don’t think it’s good for our long-term stability.

 

Read full story · Comments { 7 }

Progressive Notes: Why Occupy Wall St.?, Liberals Howl at BofA, 10th Anniv. of Afghan War,and Other Doings

Art offers his perspective as a movement progressive activist.

“I cannot afford a politician so all I made is this sign!”-Sign from Occupy Houston event.

Love This Sign!

NYC Occupier Fed Up

Occupy Wall St. moves forward and gains steam. And its spreading to 100 cities. The media is reporting on it increasingly. So the words from one of it’s organizers, Yotam Marom, I think shows exactly what the goal truly is. I think this can work:

Externally, then, it is simple. We have to draw clear lines from the oppression heaped on this society to the agents responsible for it. If Chase Bank is foreclosing on homes, we need to foreclose on Chase Bank. If the city government is cutting schools and homeless shelters, we need to shut it down. They want quiet streets, un-interrupted work days, pristine bank branches, functional government institutions, productive workplaces, docile schools, and lines of unflinching shoppers. They want business as usual, and that’s what we have to take from them. Liberty Plaza is not the struggle; it is the home for the creation of the alternative, and the staging ground for the fight that takes us out into the streets, to make business as usual truly untenable.

We win when we build diverse movements led by the most oppressed people in society, capable of proposing an alternative, laying the seeds for it, and taking the power necessary to transform it from the alternative to the norm. We win when we raise social costs to the point that those hopeless few elites find themselves left with no carrots to wave before us and no sticks big enough to do us any harm. We win when we show no signs of weakening, when we refuse to go home. We win when the movement grows and grows and grows with no sign of letting up. We win when losing is not an option, when winning is the only way to really be human.

Want to join a Occupy protest in your city? 1,000 cities and towns now have Occupy events. Go here to find out what is going on in your town and read more about this movement here.

Angry and Betrayed

Key Democrats urge the Afghan War be ended on it’s 10th anniversary including Rep. Barney Frank. No wonder more and more folks are pouring into the streets to protest- there is no reason to have so many in this war and lives lost. None.

Key Dems have guns blazing for Bank of America’s outrageous $5.00 fee for using your own debit card. In the House and Senate Dems are moving on bills to abolish such a practice. Great politics that forces the GOP to defend bankster idiocy:

Rep. Brad Miller, a Democrat from North Carolina — a critical swing state whose biggest private employer is BofA — introduced a bill eliminating other fees for bank consumers on Tuesday. He urged customers to abandon “unrepentant banks that are still trying to rake in vulgar profits.”

And Obama’s top ally in the Senate, Illinois Democrat Dick Durbin — who introduced the changes to debit fees BofA opposes — was even more unequivocal.

When asked if he agreed with Obama’s comments about the CFPB, Durbin said federal agencies — the Federal Trade Commission, Federal Reserve Board and the CFPB – that will be closely watching how the BofA situation unfolds.

“I believe in something called competition — great word. We use it in the free-market economy,” Durbin said during a conference call with reporters. “If Bank of America decided they want to run the risk of losing their loyal customers, I want their customers to go someplace where they are treated better.”

The Progressive Caucus is sending a letter to the Debt Committee to spare SS, Medicare and Medicaid. More on it here .

Next week labor is organizing “We Want to Work” protests. Trying to channel the anti Wall St. sentiment these protests are to push for you know jobs over worries over deficits. Go here to find a event near you.

A vote suppression horror story coming to a town near you. A 96 year old woman disenfranchised. Why? When she went to get her i.d. to vote she was denied one because she has no marriage certificate. Without that she cannot prove supposedly her last name, which was her husband’s. Will the DOJ and courts step in to stop this mayhem?

The DOJ in Texas has the new voter i.d. under a hold still and has asked tough questions about how it will impact minority voting. Well the Texas Secretary of State sent the DOJ a letter with very vague responses. So, the Texas Democratic Party wrote a tough letter to the DOJ urging the voter i.d. bill not be allowed clearance. The party tells the DOJ that:

You also requested:

“For the 605,576 registered voters who the State has advised do not have a Texas driver’s license or personal identification card, please provide the number of such person by Spanish surname, as well as an estimated number by race, within county of residence;”

Again, the SOS only provided numbers by Spanish surname.

For the SOS to claim that they cannot produce the information requested is just plain false. It is entirely possible that the SOS can obtain highly accurate estimates of the race of the remaining voters. The most logical thing to do would be to utilize the Texas State Data Center. The Texas State Data Center and Office of the State Demographer, in cooperation with a network of affiliates, functions as a focal point for the distribution of Census information for Texas. The State Data Center houses the Texas Population Estimates and Projections Program established in the mid-1980s to meet a growing demand for population estimates for places and counties and for estimates and projections for counties that had age, sex and race/ethnicity detail. Exactly the kind of data you’re asking for.

They could also use a commercial vendor of which there are many who provide this type of analysis for marketing agencies and well as government entities.

If they don’t like those options, they can give the data to us and we’ll get the analysis done and send it to the DOJ to fulfill your request. The fact that they refuse to even try sure makes it seem like they’ve got something to hide, like how many of those voters who lack government issued photo id are African American and Asian.

If the State of Texas refuses to provide the data requested by your Department regarding the race of the registered voters without government issued photo I.D., then it is our contention that they have not met the burden of proof required under the Voting Rights Act for the legislation to be pre-cleared and therefore pre-clearance should be denied.

Seems the voter i.d. law does not meet civil rights standards so we wait on DOJ to issues it’s ruling soon.

This week’s Right wing nut watch has Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky). Mr. Tea Party is having a problem with the Wall St. Occupy protests and calls them a “Paris mob.” He claims Obama is inflaming their rage and egging them on to possibly riot. Ok then! Oh and let us not forget what Tea Party folks did to a young woman at a Rand Paul event by stopping on her head. And not a word from Paul about that real violence.

Read full story · Comments { 5 }

‘In the News’ Diary Spotlight

The feature today comes from “Cujo359,” with his entire “In the News” diary posted below.

 

Occupy Wall Street sign about student loans and medical bills of a 22 year old protester, Sept., 2011Image credit: Matt Stoller

We tried to speak between lines of oration
You could only repeat what we told you.
Your axe belongs to a dying nation,
They don’t know that we own you.
You’re watching movies trying to find the feelers,
You only see what we show you.
We’re the slaves of the phony leaders
Breathe the air we have blown you.

Lyrics to “The Punk Meets The Godfather (NOTE 1)

Back when I worked for a relatively large defense firm, I had a boss who when we were making up slides for a presentation, would insist that we only have three “bullet points”, meaning three thoughts or concepts to discuss, per slide. “What happens if there are four things to talk about?”, I’d ask. “Remove one of them”, was the response. Needless to say, most of those slides had either two or three bullet points, since almost never made sense to make a slide with only one. I suspect this sameness didn’t help hold peoples’ interest very much.

Why did my boss insist on this rule? It turns out that someone did some research into how best to hold an audience’s attention in these sorts of presentations, and that was a rule they came up with. Too many thoughts at once, or too few slides, and people lose focus. All of which, I can tell you as a member of those audiences, is largely true. The problem wasn’t the rule itself. The problem was in the application.

Rules like this are guidelines. Follow them most of the time, and you’re going to find whatever you’re doing works better. Unfortunately, there are times when the rules don’t fit very well. For instance, there’s a rule in english grammar that I try to follow, which is to not begin a sentence with a conjunction. It’s a good rule, most of the time.

But every once in a while, I feel the need to break it. Because sometimes, that’s what works.

Image credit: Rayna Daine/Occupy Together

Which brings us to the “problem” so many on the Left seem to think the Occupy Wall Street movement has. A great many pundits, that largely useless group of chowder heads whose sole purpose in life seems to be to repeat what passes for conventional wisdom among our rulers back to us, think that things are just all wrong with this movement. Where’s the platform? Where are your fancy clothes? Where’s the list of demands? Where are your objectives? Where’s the media outreach? Where are the grievances? Where are the riot police?

What got me thinking about that story about the bullet points was an article Dusty wrote a couple of days ago at Leftwing Nutjob:

As someone that spent my last employed years working in marketing, I clench my teeth when I read blogs or Corporate Media articles tearing into the occupiers about the lack of ‘a message’. I know they need one[.]

NYCLU at OccupyWallStreet, cops intimidating journalists and photographers

She wrote that on the way to pointing out that it didn’t matter here, but this encapsulates the sort of thinking a lot of folks apply to this situation.

The problem is, it’s perfectly obvious what the message is. The message is the place.

If you asked those protesters what their own particular demands were, you’d no doubt get dozens of different responses. There are so many things that are going wrong right now, from crumbling infrastructure to lawless government, that making any short list of demands, the only thing that seems to hold the attention of the chowder heads, is going to leave out so many important points as to make the list almost worthless.

Besides, take a look at these protesters. They’re kids. They have acne. They’re falling in love. They have huge appetites. What they don’t have, generally speaking, is a perspective of how their society and its financial system work based on their own experiences. Heck, I’m in my fifties, and I can handle just about any math you can throw at me, and I can’t figure some of it out.

What they certainly do know is that the future looks worse every day, and it’s their future. As Kevin Gosztola put it recently:

No person participating in Occupy Wall Street will talk about some mythical American Dream that has been held over Americans to pacify them. They understand this country has owners and like comedian George Carlin said there is a club and they “ain’t in it.” They are out planting the seeds of rebellion and for many it is either annoying because they think it will divert and suck off too much energy and fail or, worse, lead to a confrontation that sparks riots.

Why Establishment Media & the Power Elite Loathe Occupy Wall Street

[I added that link to the George Carlin video and my own commentary]

Yes, for the record, some of the protesters are older, but mostly this is the young fighting for their future.

Why should we expect them to come up with a list of demands? Do you think it would make much difference, assuming they could even agree on all these points, if they had pamphlets to hand out with the official Occupy Wall Street logo that said something like this?

I could probably easily add lots of other items to that list, all of which would have a positive effect on the economy, and all of which are things we already know would do exactly that. So could lots of people, the problem is that our rulers don’t want to implement them. (see NOTE 2)

We know what needs to be done. We’ve been saying so for a long time. Click on the economy keyword at my blog. Go to the Economics Policy Institute and start reading. Read Robert Reich, Paul Krugman, or Dean Baker for crying out loud.

You don’t arrange a protest to deliver a doctoral thesis. You arrange a protest to deliver one simple demand to your rulers: Get it done.

Besides, there is a more specific message, and to anyone who is willing to listen for a moment, it’s loud and clear. It’s our first “bullet point”:

  • Stop letting this place suck the life from our country

Phrase that any way you want. Stop the greed. Stop the “I’ve got mine, the hell with you” attitude. Stop obsessing about taxes when we already pay lessthan just about any advanced country. Stop the ruthless pursuit of profit, no matter what the cost to the society you live within. Stop the endless control fraud with no one being punished except people who had a friend willing to tip them off.

Image credit: Matt Stoller, clipped by Cujo359

They’re protesting at the black heart of our nation’s financial sector – the place where people did their level best to ruin our economy, were bailed out by the government to the tune of trillions of dollars, and gave themselves bonuses while exclaiming about how it’s “class warfare” to make them pay more to clean up the mess they made.

That brings us to our second bullet point:

  • Make the people who profited from our decline pay to reverse it

Caption: Where did all the economic growth end up? Into the hands of the richest people in the country, mostly.

Image credit: Economic Policy Institute

Yes, that’s my summation of lots of signs we see in all those pictures, but how much of an idiot do you have to be not to notice this theme? All those references to “the other 99%”, “the banksters”, and “bailouts” are about the fact that a scant few percent of Americans are the only ones who have seen their standard of living increase in the last three decades. As they’ve profited, we’ve declined, in our educational systems, our health care, our industry, and our science. These things all made us stronger as a people and as a country when we were willing to support them. Now, we’re told, somehow this was all wrong. To use President Fierce Advocate’s formulation, we’ve all “gone soft”, thanks to being coddled so much by our marvelous health care system, I suppose.

Caption: A chart of who has benefited from the expanded economy from 1950 to the present. As you can see, folks in the upper one percent or so of the population have reaped most of the benefits since President Reagan changed the tax burden in America. See this article for an explanation of that chart, and some others. [Click on the chart to enlarge.]

Image credit: Critter’s Crap

I have news for him. We’re dying at a rate of 45,000 a year thanks to not having access to health care, something his piece of crap insurance industry-subsidizing health care “reform” bill has done nothing to address. Every day, we’re trying to figure out how to do with less, thanks to the government’s policy of propping up the financial sector, rather than simply letting it go bankrupt and taking it over. We die at a horrific rate relative to other advanced countries through murder and other criminal activity, yet there are far more of us in jail than in any other country we’d want to call a peer.

It’s pretty tough down here in the lower 99 percent, Mr. President, and maybe if you think otherwise you can spend a year or two being us.

Why is this so hard to understand? To avoid understanding these points, at least if you’ve been paying attention to what’s been going on in America for the last couple of decades, you have to want to not understand.

But there’s one final bullet point we need to cover. It’s a message that’s probably hidden from the view of anyone who is under 30. Still, they’re making this point, whether they know it or not. To understand what that is, those of us who were around during the 1960s need to think back for a minute.

Remember when we were their age? Remember wondering if you were going to be sent by our parents’ generation to go fight in a useless war? Remember how we weren’t supposed to trust anyone over 30, because anyone who would send their kids to some place they hadn’t heard of to kill other kids they had no beef with didn’t deserve to be trusted? Remember that?

No, I was never silly enough to believe that. I knew there were plenty of my parents’ generation who opposed that war – not only because their kids were involved, but just because it was plain wrong. They’d fought their own war to make sure things like this didn’t happen, where powerful countries would use their strength to subjugate the little ones. They loved the idea of a United Nations, where disputes could be resolved peacefully. Nor did I think that we were any smarter than they were, generally speaking. I was pretty sure we’d commit our own follies, whatever they might be. The best I could hope for was that we wouldn’t repeat theirs.

When I was the age of most of those protesters, I was able to attend college at a fairly inexpensive state school and receive a good education there, thanks to the college grants my parents’ and grandparents’ generation set up. The public schools I attended as a boy trained me adequately to attend there, thanks to generations of Americans who knew that an educated public was the basis of a strong industrial society. Those who couldn’t go to college could still hope for a high-paying job in a manufacturing company or a construction trade. Unions still had enough power to negotiate living wages, because our grandparents and their parents had fought for, and passed, a legal and economic environment where that was possible.

Image credit: Cropped from this U.K. Guardian photo by Cujo359

And what did we do when it was our turn to run the country? We didn’t bat an eye when we shipped high-paying jobs overseas, assuming that the free market fairy would bring us new ones. We dismantled the regulatory systems that our grandparents had put in place to prevent the next depression, once again calling on the free market fairy to save us from ourselves.

At the same time, we gradually closed off any opportunity for our kids to get a higher education, saddling those who still could with massive debts. We sent our kids off to fight useless wars.

It’s as though we said to our parents and grandparents “Thanks for holding the gate open for us. Now close it and don’t let anyone else in.”

When Senator “How can you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?” voted for the Iraq War, I knew that even my own modest hopes for us were not going to be realized. We were more feckless than our parents.

So here’s a bonus bullet point, for those over 45:

  • Try to be the people you know you should be

Whatever John Edwards’ personal faults, and the man has a few (see NOTE 3), I’ll always respect him for being the first presidential candidate to dare to state the obvious, which is that we are the first generation who won’t leave our kids a better world than the one we inherited. Like Pete Townsend’s Godfather, we just tell them we used to be just like them, when it’s perfectly clear that, in many ways, we had it far better. We should be ashamed, and no doubt some of us are.

It would be a lot more useful, though, instead of feeling guilty, to actually be those people some of us thought we’d be three decades ago. Be the people who want everyone to get a fair shake in life. Be the ones who remember the pain and suffering that useless war can wreak on a society that wages it. Be the people who at least try to make things better, by opposing the people who are trying to ruin this country for their own profit, and the politicians, all of them, who allow that to happen.

There you have it, something for every chowder head – a message, three bullet points, and a list of demands. What are you pundits and other so-called progressives going to do about it, other than natter about how this demand or that one is just not “serious”?

My bet is that you’re not going to do a damn thing worth talking about. Which, quite frankly, makes those kids in their mohawks and funny clothes a hell of a lot more serious than you are.

NOTES

NOTE 1: “The Punk Meets The Godfather” is a copyrighted work of Pete Townsend and The Who, none of whom approved of or are even aware of this article.

The song is from the rock opera Quadrophenia. It’s about a young fan who is living on the streets who meets up with The Who.

NOTE 2: Actually, some of the Occupy Wall Street protesters have come up with lists of demands, as David Swanson notes.

NOTE 3: I wouldn’t even mention Edwards’ faults, but for the near certainty that some mouth-breather will feel obliged to explain how he’s under indictment and cheated on his dying wife. I know that, and it’s magnificently irrelevant. It’s possible, and in fact it seems to be normal, to have a good understanding of things and yet still screw up. He’s the first major presidential candidate to voice that uncomfortable truth, and he deserves credit for that.

Cross posted from Slobber And Spittle

Read full story · Comments { 17 }

Queer Talk: Coming out as an LGBT ally

Joyce L. Arnold: Liberal, lesbian, Independent, equality activist, writer. At TaylorMarsh: Liberally Independent, including the Two Parties series, and Queer Talk

UPDATE: Values Voter Summit Straw Poll results at bottom

This won’t make top blog and news reading lists, but please note: October is LGBT History Month, and October 11 is National Coming Out Day. This Queer Talk column is a sampling of stories of why both knowing our history, and marking the significance of “coming out” are important, and have real consequences in real lives – both LGBT and heterosexual.

John Aravosis writes at AmericaBlogGay, Matthew Shepard was attacked 13 years ago tonight:

Thirteen years ago tonight (October 6) Matthew Shepard was lured to a rural road, tied up, crucifixion style, pistol whipped then left for dead, simply because he was gay. He wasn’t found for nearly a day, still barely alive in the 30 degree weather, the only part of his face not covered by blood was where the tears had streamed down. The attack on Matthew, and his subsequent death a few days later, was a galvanizing moment for the gay community. It was one of only a handful of moments I can think of, in the twenty years that I’ve been out, that something changed in all of us, nationwide, at a much larger, meta level.

And thirteen years later, via MSNBC, an update on the story of Jamey Rodemeyer, another young gay man who completed suicide after years of hate:

The parents of 14-year-old Jamey Rodemeyer, who was found dead at their home on Sept. 18, indicated in an exclusive interview with TODAY’s Ann Curry on Tuesday that their daughter endured further taunts at a school function immediately after Jamey’s wake. At a homecoming dance … a potentially poignant moment turned ugly after a song by Lady Gaga, Jamey’s favorite artist, who recently dedicated a song at a concert in his memory.

‘She was having a great time, and all of a sudden a Lady Gaga song came on, and they all started chanting for Jamey, all of his friends,’ Jamey’s mother, Tracy, told Curry. ‘Then the bullies that put him into this situation started chanting, ‘You’re better off dead!’ and ‘We’re glad you’re dead!’ and things like that.’

From an October 4 press release by the Tennessee Equality Project:

Last week, Jerry Pittman, Jr. and his boyfriend Dustin Lee were brutally attacked on the grounds of Grace Fellowship Church in Fruitland, Gibson County (TN). According to reports, Jerry’s uncle and two church deacons beat the two young men while yelling homophobic slurs at the direction of Jerry’s father, the pastor of the church.

From a recent press release by the ACLU-TN:

Last week Chris Sigler, a 17-year-old senior at Sequoyah High School in Madisonville, Tennessee, was reportedly pushed, bumped in the chest and verbally harassed by his principal for wearing a T-shirt in support of efforts to establish a gay-straight alliance (GSA) club on campus. hroughout the incident, which was witnessed by the student’s sister, Principal Maurice Moser allegedly taunted the student with statements like, ‘Who’s the big man now?’

The photo at the top of this post is of the t-shirt Sigler was wearing, on which he’d written his GSA supportive message. Dangerous stuff, apparently.

From Igor Volsky at Think Progress:

Anti-gay groups like the National Organization for Marriage (NOM) and the Family Research Council are ramping up their effort to overturn California’s FAIR Education Act — which requires the schools to include the contributions of LGBT people to history and culture. Jeremy Hooper notes that the repeal campaign have issued a scare flier suggesting that students will be required to learn about Chaz Bono at the expense of historical figures like George Washington:

But the law doesn’t narrow the curriculum — it expands it … without sacrificing the contributions of the founding fathers.

Via the The Southern Poverty Law Center, an October 3 post:

‘Prominent public figures will be speaking at the Values Voter Summit in our nation’s capital this weekend.

But whose values will they be promoting?

Look at the groups behind the Summit – the Family Research Council (FRC) and the American Family Association (AFA). …

The FRC claims that gay rights advocates want to ‘recognize pedophiles as the ‘prophets’ of a new sexual order.’ …

The AFA says that gay people orchestrated the Holocaust and were responsible for the killing of six million Jews.

A partial list of some of the Electeds scheduled to participate, as the names appear at Values Voter Summit:

House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio)
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.)
Senator Rick Santorum, Republican Presidential Candidate
Governor Rick Perry (R-Texas), Republican Presidential Candidate
Herman Cain, Republican Presidential Candidate
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, Republican Presidential Candidate
Representative Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), Republican Presidential Candidate
Representative Ron Paul (R-Texas), Republican Presidential Candidate
Governor Mitt Romney, Republican Presidential Candidate

The greater the number of LGBT and supporters who are out, the more progress is made. That is NOT to say that “coming out,” as Queer or as an ally, is a one-size-fits-all proposition. Out everywhere; selectively out; not out – not one of us in a position to tell anyone else what they “should” or “must” do. But as more people are more and more out, the efforts of the anti-LGBT crowd, particularly of those who are apparently obsessed with “the homosexuals,” seem to become a bit more desperate. And the words they use – like at the Values Voter Summit – have consequences.

Our Queer history clearly shows we’ve made incredible progress. I do believe that the day will come when being “out” is the “no big deal” some think it is today. But even thirteen years after the murder of Matthew Shepard, we’re not there. So we – LGBT’s and our supporters – keep on coming out. And that’s a process, not a one-time-and-it’s-all-done kind of thing. You keep on doing it, day after day. That’s as much how history is made as are the big moments.

UPDATE: Values Voter Summit Straw Poll results, via TPM :

Ron Paul: 37%
Herman Cain: 23%
Rick Santorum: 16%
Rick Perry: 8%
Michele Bachmann: 8%
Mitt Romney: 4%
Newt Gingrich: 3%
Jon Huntsman: 0%
Undecided: 1%

( Photo via Think Progress )

Read full story · Comments { 9 }

Dash of Dan: Elvis Brownie Bites

Sometimes I feel like I’m from another era.

Maybe the 50’s. In due part to the music I grew up listening to.

My dad is a huge Elvis Presley fan. I myself have a great Elvis music collection.

Not to mention the golden record that’s in my room, my dads of course.

So here’s an ode to the King (with a nod to my dad), brownie bites with banana and studded with peanut butter chips.

The combination here is really a favorite for kids or older kids.

 


Recipe:

3 squares semi-sweet baking chocolate

1/2 cup (1 stick) of unsalted butter

2 eggs                                                                              1 teaspoon salt

1 1/2 cups light brown sugar, packed               1 1/2 teaspoons vanilla extract

1 tablespoon strong black coffee, brewed       1 teaspoon cinnamon

1 mashed ripe banana                                              1 cup all purpose flour

1 cup (or a 12 oz. bag) of peanut butter chips

* Preheat oven to 350 degrees

  1. In a small saucepan over medium heat, melt the butter and chocolate squares. Set aside to cool.
  2. In a large bowl whisk together eggs, sugar, vanilla, coffee, and cinnamon. Add the mashed banana, and the cooled chocolate, drizzling it in slowly, stir lightly.
  3. Add flour and salt, stirring until just blended. Fold in the peanut butter chips.

* To make smaller size bites, butter muffin tins and fill up about three-quarters full or butter a 9-inch baking pan for larger brownies.

4. Bake for 20-25 minutes or until a toothpick comes out clean when tested in the center of the brownies.

 

Oh and you didn’t think you’d get away without seeing the gold record….

This is an open thread!

 

 

Read full story · Comments { 7 }

Friday Night Odds and Ends

“The protests that are trying to destroy the jobs of working people in this city aren’t productive,” Bloomberg said in his weekly radio appearance with John Gambling. Taking a swipe at “some of the labor unions participating,” Bloomberg added that “their salaries come from – are paid by – some of the people they’re trying to vilify.” – Mayor Bloomberg: Occupy Wall Street ‘Trying To Destroy the Jobs of Working People’

Why Occupy Wall Street? Watch the video above. I’d like to see Scott Brown do what Elizabeth Warren does in the video above, from DC Douglas.

Tech President reports from Wall Street and why some people just aren’t getting what’s going on.

In other news, Mitt Romney gave a foreign policy speech. Spencer Ackerman’s plea? Give me something to work with here, Mitt.

…and speaking of Mitt Romney, one of Perry’s backers calls Mormonism a “cult.”

Laura Rozen writes on McChrystal and what he has to say as we commemorate 10 years in Afghanistan: Ten years on, U.S. goals in Afghanistan only “fifty percent” met.

An “Ides of March” review from the New York Times. Another review mentions Jay Carson, someone I’ve met and spoken with on many occasions, but also adds color to the melding of reality and movie making:

As for the Morris handlers — Stephen Myers, played by Ryan Gosling; and Paul Zara, played by Philip Seymour Hoffman — it is impossible not to find traces of political strategist Jay Carson in their characters. A former campaign press secretary and adviser, Carson is CEO of the C40 Clinton Climate Initiative, which combines programs started by New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and former President Bill Clinton.

While on the campaign trail with Howard Dean and others, Carson was joined by Beau Willimon, a staff associate. Willimon later wrote a play on which The Ides of March is based, with substantial changes by Clooney; Willimon; and the other writer, Grant Heslov.

“Beau, George and Grant really get it,” Carson said recently. (more at the link)

And in case you missed it, essays on Bill Clinton’s presidency are now online in celebration of when he announced, 20 years ago last week. This video offers a flashback, too.

Jared Bernstein on the jobs report: “Shaky Stability.”

AP reports prostate cancer screenings for men are out.

Herman Cain catapults 20 points ahead of Mitt Romney in a new Zogby poll.

Happy Friday night!

Read full story · Comments { 7 }

White House Challenges Alabama Immigration Law

From Huffington Post:

The federal government asked an appeals court Friday to halt the Alabama immigration law considered by many the toughest in the U.S., saying it could have dire diplomatic consequences abroad, invites discrimination and merely forces illegal immigrants into neighboring states.

The motion, filed in the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, claimed Alabama’s new law is “highly likely to expose persons lawfully in the United States, including school children, to new difficulties in routine dealings.”

Read full story · Comments { 4 }

THE HILLARY EFFECT: Nobel Peace Prize for 2011 Goes to Three Activist Women

It’s another nod to the Hillary Effect.

Congratulations to Liberia’s Pres. Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, the first female president of Africa, Leymah Gbowee, and Tawakul Karman of Yemen.

The importance of women’s role around the world elevated, with the Nobel committee making a statement and headline news, offers another change in the status quo. This is truly something to celebrate.

Nobel Peace Prize Awarded to Three Activist Women

The Nobel Peace Prize for 2011 was awarded on Friday to three campaigning women from Africa and the Arab world in acknowledgment of their nonviolent role in promoting peace, democracy and gender equality. The winners were President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf of Liberia — Africa’s first elected female president — her compatriot, peace activist Leymah Gbowee, and Tawakul Karman of Yemen, a pro-democracy campaigner.

[...] Most of the recipients in the award’s 110-year history have been men and Friday’s decision seemed designed to give impetus to the cause for women’s rights around the world.

Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Leymah Gbowee, and Tawakul Karman stand on their own courage, their own actions leading to the changes still evolving in their corners of the world. They certainly didn’t need Secy. Clinton to tell them their own passions and purpose.

However, it was Hillary Rodham Clinton who has tirelessly trumpeted to the world to wake up to what women’s contributions to their countries mean to the world and anyone wanting stability to rein in still developing, often troubled, regions.

As the Washington Post reported in January, 2010, the Hillary Effect was already in full swing around the world, because of Hillary’s presence, her footprint.

“Hillary Clinton is so visible” as secretary of state, said Amelia Matos Sumbana, who just arrived as ambassador from Mozambique. “She makes it easier for presidents to pick a woman for Washington.”

No one in the Obama administration has worked harder in the last few years to put women’s rights in the forefront of changing countries more than Secy. Clinton. No one has so relentlessly made the case that women can close the gap in stabilizing a troubled country, including setting a burgeoning economy on firmer ground.

It’s the case she began making when she was first lady and went to Beijing, China to give her now famous speech on “human rights are women’s rights.” It has been one of her main missions as secretary of state to bring focus to the roles of women in their government and the importance of their voices being heard. Clinton’s historic and very difficult visit to the Congo revealed the depths of her commitment.

The stability of countries depends on women being engaged in their government, as well as their voices heard and heeded.

Awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to three women changing their worlds sends a message around the globe that has the potential to inspire more women to be brave, becoming the catalyst for even more progress.

Read full story · Comments { 4 }

Liberally Independent: It’s what Citigroup / Wall Street says about the economy, stupid

Joyce L. Arnold: Liberal, lesbian, Independent, equality activist, writer

This latest in the Two Parties, Too Few Choices series begins with the term used by Citigroup, back in 2005, to describe what they called “income and wealth inequality” – plutonomy.

But before looking at that, this provides some current context: From TPM:

President Obama tiptoed around a question on the Occupy Wall Street protests at his White House press conference on Thursday, telling reporters that he understood their ‘frustration’ without explicitly supporting or distancing himself from the movement.

As politicians and Electeds love to say, “Let me be clear” – things are well beyond “frustration.”

Now about Citigroup’s “plutonomy” – whatever terms you use to describe our economic and political realities, the bottom line is this: a tiny group of super wealthy are close to being in control of the international economy. That’s an “oligarchy,” (power held by a few), a “plutocracy” (power of wealth). That’s a description of how the vast majority of the world’s population is, to varying degrees, screwed, used, discarded or ignored by many of those at the top. That’s what Wall Street is happy with; what Citigroup calls the plutonomy, and anyone who doesn’t see the good of the plutocracy as good economics is just stupid. Or simply inconsequential.

You can check out the 2005 and 2006 Citigroup reports via Maximinlaw here and here. Reading it now, a few years after the releases, provides some more context for Occupy Wall Street, and the 2012 Two Corporate Parties’ version of democracy. From the second release, March 5, 2006, “Equity Strategy Revisiting Plutonomy: The Rich Getting Richer”: (all emphasis mine)

The latest Survey of Consumer Finances, for 2004, has been released by the Federal Reserve. It shows the rich continue to account for a disproportionately large share of income and wealth in the US economy : the richest 10% of Americans account for 43% of income, and 57% of net worth. … The rich are in great shape, financially. …

Asset booms, a rising profit share and favorable treatment by market-friendly governments have allowed the rich to prosper and become a greater share of the economy in the plutonomy countries.

Just a few more quotes, to be sure we have the peppy plutonomy pitch firmly in mind:

While the average consumer might not be feeling great, the important consumers – the richest 20%, who account, as we’ve shown, for 58% of income – are in good shape.

What’s happening now, with Occupy Wall Street, with the October 2011 actions in DC, in cities and towns across the nation … these are challenges to the Two Party System, but more fundamentally yet, to the international “plutonomy.” Whether the challenge comes with the goal of making changes from within or without the system, the Democratic / Republican Duopoly remains the dominant means of control in our nation, having convinced many that challenges are futile. When the Challenged become annoyed enough to notice the Challengers, they have options in place, including: 1) ignore; 2) ridicule and/or condescendingly minimize and dismiss; 3) use the power of position, and the media, to misrepresent the activists; 4) apply pressure – by use of laws, codes, ordinances; by show of police force; by limiting internet access; 5) or maybe say you “understand,” but keep “doing something” vague, and possible only after the next election.

One of the most interesting things about Occupy Wall Street is watching how people – across the political spectrum – respond, both in terms of the amount of attention, and in terms of the interpretations applied. Watching the contortions to force OWS into a framework with which legacy parties and legacy media are comfortable is revealing, if unsurprising. Just as interesting is how people – Electeds, media and more – who only started paying attention two or three weeks into Occupy are now providing interpretations and critiques, including of the period when they weren’t paying attention.

I realize none of this is new information, in terms of the “plutonomy,” the economic system that exists with that top one to ten to twenty percent in mind. They’re the “important” people, the ones our two political parties exist to serve. Our assigned role is to vote for one or the other. It’s okay with those running the show if we question individual players, or level searing criticisms at one or both parties. Or at each other. It’s okay if we routinely flip the “majority.” All of that keeps us diverted. But they really, really don’t want us to question that Two Party System, and the “plutonomy” it serves.

One reason Occupy Wall Street is important is because people are finding ways to question by showing how our economic / political system is destroying lives. One place to hear what’s being said is an OWS related site, “We Are The 99 Percent”:

We are getting kicked out of our homes. … forced to choose between groceries and rent. … denied quality medical care. … suffering from environmental pollution. … working long hours for little pay and no rights, if we’re working at all. …

Follow OWS here, and check out Occupy Together for a regularly updated list of related actions around the world. As of late yesterday afternoon, 751 cities were listed.

From Political Ticker Dems attempt to harness anger at Wall Street.

From Common Dreams, How #OccupyWallStreet Is Evolving and Gaining Power.

From WaPO What does the economy look like where you live? Show us with your Instagram photos.

And for a new action, which began in DC yesterday, October 6, visit October 2011:

October 2011 is the 10th anniversary of the invasion of Afghanistan and the beginning of the 2012 federal austerity budget. …

We call on people … who seek peace, economic justice, human rights and a healthy environment … to join together in Washington, D.C., beginning on Oct. 6, 2011, in nonviolent resistance similar to the Arab Spring and the Midwest awakening. …

We face ongoing wars and massive socio-economic and environmental destruction perpetrated by a corporate empire which is oppressing, occupying and exploiting the world. …

It’s unlikely to be a quick and dramatic success, but choices beyond the two options we’re suppose to accept are being created.

( Photo via ThinkProgress )

Read full story · Comments { 8 }

Why is Scott Brown Talking About Warren Being Naked?

**UPDATED**

Elizabeth Warren got in a good zinger in last night’s debate when asked about Scott Brown’s Playgirl layout. “I didn’t take my clothes off” to pay for school, she quipped.

That got to Sen. Brown, who today went on talk radio. But instead of making things better for himself, he took aim at his foot and shot off his toes.

A little smutty humor, compliments of the sexist Republican senator from Massachusetts. Why he decided to go where he did in this interview is beyond me.

Scott Brown quips about Elizabeth Warren’s appearance on Boston radio show

Brown was responding to a crack Warren made in Tuesday’s debate, when the Democrat was asked about Scott Brown using his centerfold spread in Cosmopolitan magazine decades ago to pay for college. Warren said “I didn’t take my clothes off” to pay for school.

Asked by the WZLX disc jockey for a response, Brown said “Thank God,” eliciting laughter from the DJs.

From Greg Sargent, the Massachusetts Democratic Party executive director Clare Kelly responds:

“Sen. Brown’s comments are the kind of thing you would expect to hear in a frat house, not a race for U.S. Senate. We keep waiting for Scott Brown to take his campaign out of the gutter, but unfortunately it seems like the junior senator has determined that mudslinging and dirty tricks are the only way he can distract Massachusetts voters from his record of voting in lockstep with Tea Party Republicans. Scott Brown’s comments send a terrible message that even accomplished women who are held in the highest esteem can be laughingly dismissed based on their looks.”

I think Clare Kelly’s response is way too defensive. We’ve come a lot farther than simply saying Ms. Warren is being dismissed “based on her looks.” What Kelly could have said is that a lot of men find smart women beautiful. If Scott Brown isn’t one of them then he’s too behind the times to be in the U.S. Senate.

But to add… I am reminded of what Hillary always did with these types of questions, something that Sarah Palin never learned, but interestingly, Michele Bachmann did. ALWAYS turn it back to your issue of choice & strength. Get the subject back to policy and what’s important. Don’t let the media divert you, not ever.

Read full story · Comments { 21 }

ESPN Dumps Hank Williams, Jr.

“We have decided to part ways with Hank Williams, Jr. We appreciate his contributions over the past years,” the company said in a statement. “The success of Monday Night Football has always been about the games and that will continue.” – Hank Williams Jr. Ditched By ESPN Over Obama Hitler Comments

As you probably guessed, Mr. Williams tells a different tale:

AFTER ESPN SUSPENDS HANK JR. FOR ONE-WEEK, HANK JR. DECIDES TO PULL HIS SONG FROM BEING USED ON ESPN FOR REMAINDER OF SEASON!

“After reading hundreds of e-mails, I have made MY decision. By pulling my opening Oct 3rd, You (ESPN) stepped on the Toes of The First Amendment Freedom of Speech, so therefore Me, My Song, and All My Rowdy Friends are OUT OF HERE. It’s been a great run.”

The response from Williams reveals a lot and I don’t think any of it is good.

That the demise of the relationship between ESPN and Hank Williams, Jr. played out on Fox News channel over Barack Obama, race, and Hitler talking points underscores the reasons why Roger Ailes has begun a “course correction,” changing the trajectory of Fox, first by sacking Glenn Beck. I’m wondering if Fox & Friend’s “circuitous” broadside at Sarah Palin, which was preceding by Laura Ingraham and Ann Coulter telling Mrs. Palin to fish or cut bait, is another sign of the changing skies of Fox.

Perhaps cable TV has gone as far as it can go and sanity will creep back in? Considering even Rachel Maddow’s ratings are down, I’m not too sure. Ms. Maddow gets a terrific write up in Hollywood Reporter, with these types of article, no matter how well earned, often appearing when sagging ratings require a marketing boost.

I’m glad ESPN canned Williams. There is nothing worse than sports mixed with politics.

Read full story · Comments { 15 }

Obama: Our economy needs a jolt right now.

Official White House photo by Pete Souza

Today’s press conference with Pres. Obama offers an opportunity for some very pointed questions that matter as his reelection campaign kicks into high gear.

Politico has a few good questions, the first one exactly what I would ask: Why so late on jobs?

2. The Occupy Wall Street protests: With ‘em or against ‘em?

3. Why not impose sanctions on China?

4. Rick Perry’s rock?

5. Alabama’s immigration law?

What you you ask Pres. Obama if you had one question to put to him?

Read full story · Comments { 19 }