TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Tag Archives | Al Gore

Nobel Laureate Al Gore Silences Marsha Blackburn

No doubt, one of the things former Vice President Al Gore expected on Friday was to come face to face with the head in the sand crowd. However, even he was likely a bit surprised when Rep. Blackburn insinuated that the whole purpose of his environmental work is personal greed. This woman is one of the most annoying congresspeople, second only to Michele Bachman. Her insinuation even brought back Gore’s famous sigh and with good reason. She made a fool of herself, which is clear even in the short clip here.

Testifying in front of the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Commitee, Nobel laureate and former Vice President Al Gore, founder of The Climate Project, had to deal with the Republican head in the sand crowd. In his statement to the committee Mr. Gore said many things, but one in particular struck my heart:

-This year, a number of groups ranging from the National Audubon Society to the Department of Interior, released the U.S. State of the Birds report showing that nearly a third of the nation’s 800 bird species are endangered, threatened or in significant decline due to habitat loss, invasive species and other threats including climate change. The major shift attributed to the climate crisis related to the migratory patterns and a large shift northward among a vast range of bird species in the U.S.

As much as I love birds, having raised and sheltered peacocks, as well as watching and feeding any number of different species over the years, this one fact alone is worth doing all we can to reverse. But we all, no doubt, have our own personal point of purpose when it comes to reversing global climate change.

It’s really astounding that after all these years ignorant pontificating gas bags like Blackburn still have a job in which they attack people like Al Gore, someone who has given a good deal of his life, time and money to making everyone more aware of global climate change. A purpose that Republicans still refuse to appreciate, regardless of the evidence.

It seems every time a Republican speaks on climate change the world gets dumber and less informed.

Another Republican, Steve Scalise of Louisiana, questioned the scientific basis of some of Mr. Gore’s claims about climate change.

Mr. Gore, clearly exasperated, said, “There are people who still believe that the moon landing was staged on a movie lot in Arizona.”

Read full story · Comments are closed

The News Conference

It begins at 8:00 p.m. eastern. Excerpts were sent out. I’ll just offer a couple of key graphs.

[W]e’ve put in place a comprehensive strategy designed to attack this crisis on all fronts. It’s a strategy to create jobs, to help responsible homeowners, to re-start lending, and to grow our economy over the long-term. And we are beginning to see signs of progress.

… … We will recover from this recession. But it will take time, it will take patience, and it will take an understanding that when we all work together; when each of us looks beyond our own short-term interests to the wider set of obligations we have to each other – that’s when we succeed. That’s when we prosper. And that’s what is needed right now. So let us look toward the future with a renewed sense of common purpose, a renewed determination, and most importantly, a renewed confidence that a better day will come.

Not to miss an opportunity, President Obama also talks about green jobs, something the Wall Street Journal (that’s right) wrote about as well, which is a good sign as far as I can tell.

Green is in:

That’s what clean energy jobs and businesses will do. That’s what a highly-skilled workforce will do. That’s what an efficient health care system that controls costs and entitlements like Medicare and Medicaid will do. That’s why this budget is inseparable from this recovery – because it is what lays the foundation for a secure and lasting prosperity.

Oh, and since we’re talking green stuff, Al Gore has announced his new book, Our Choice, which will pick up where An Inconvenient Truth left off. Got a release from his office today.

Obama up in a little over an hour.

Read full story · Comments { 74 }

Why is Obama Talking about ‘Clean Coal’?

–updated–

Psssst… Hey, Mr. President, there is no such thing as “clean coal.”

It makes the Reality Coalition‘s new ad hilarious, but then it would be. It’s done by the famous Coen brothers. The message is not, but it’s hard to permeate the deniers’ world. Even Obama mentioned “clean coal” in his Tuesday speech. Silly for a man so smart, also a bit embarrassing. It’s not like Al Gore, who is part of the Reality Coalition, doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

… Let’s be clear: there are no US homes, factories, shopping centers or churches powered by coal plants that capture and store their global warming pollution.

Today, coal power plants emit carbon dioxide (CO2), the pollutant causing the climate crisis. A third of the America’s carbon pollution now comes from about 600 coal-fired power plants. And of the more than 70 proposed new coal power plants, barely a handful have plans to capture and store their CO2 emissions. If these dirty plants are allowed to be built, this will mean an additional 200 million tons of global warming pollution will be emitted in America each year. Until coal power plants no longer release CO2 to the atmosphere, coal will remain a major contributor to the climate crisis.

So what’s the deal with President Obama saddling up to “clean coal”?

Sometimes confrontation is required.

Oh, and I almost forgot, on the climate change issue alone we’ve got quite a brouhaha that has bubbled up between environmentalists and George Will. Because of the work of Media Matters and others, including readers, the Post is feeling the heat. Even the ombudsman of the Post was pressured on Will’s latest climate change denier rant, responding in a column which will run tomorrow (but is now online). Senator Kerry’s got a fantastic post up taking on George Will. Like I said, sometimes confrontation is required.

Disclosure: The Reality Coalition is an advertiser on this blog, though no agreement to cover the issue comes with that placement.

Read full story · Comments { 23 }

Regrets

As wise as it might be to always look forward and not linger on what might have been, it’s hard not to wonder sometimes.

If only Al Gore had picked a running mate that could carry Florida, or proudly ran on his record in the 90s with Bill Clinton by his side. If only John Kerry had fought back immediately against the swiftboaters, or insisted upon a Democratic Convention that actually took a stand against the Republicans. If only Mark Penn wasn’t such a chump, or was fired from the Clinton campaign in November 2007.

If only…

Imagine for a moment this unfortunate scenario: McCain narrowly defeats Obama. This is not a useless mental exercise. Bringing up the fact that Obama is struggling in the polls against McCain is not just a fun drive-by hobby for concern trolls, it’s a legitimate concern for many of us Democrats who want to see McCain and Republicans across the nation lose in a landslide. Yes, it’s early. Yes, these things fluctuate. But in the political environment of 2008, the Democrat should be running away with this thing. Even after a very successful trip overseas, where many (including myself) saw a promising American leader hold his own extremely well on the world stage…a week later, he’s right back to a tie with the man who would continue the disaster of the Bush years.

To point out that Obama is doing no better than Kerry was around this time four years ago is not a reason to laugh or say “I told you so”. It’s a sign that something needs to change or we risk losing again. I’m not sure our country can even survive another term of McBushian rule. This is no small matter, and it’s why the PUMAs are so misguided and so wrong.

So, if Obama were to lose in November, what would be the one thing that many would look back on and wish he had done differently? Because of the circumstances that eventually led to Obama’s nomination, some might wonder why he didn’t pick a running mate that immediately brought the party together again, enthusiastically, and made his November victory a lock.

I’ve been pushing for Hillary to be his running mate for several reasons: She’s the most qualified for the job, she’s the anti-Dick Cheney, the 18 million people who voted for her, my personal admiration for her…but most of all, because it would practically ensure a Democratic victory. That’s what this is all about, and what it’s always been about.

But this week has brought a general consensus that Clinton will most likely not be on the ticket. This could very well be the case. That said, there’s a lot of noise on Hillary-related subjects right now. On Saturday, she was reported be on Obama’s short list. Then on Tuesday, it was reported that she was never even considered in the first place. And don’t get me started on the roll call vote controversy. I’m sure there are people who know what’s really going on behind the scenes, but I’m certainly not one of them.

The main reason I hear against choosing Hillary is that it would go against Obama’s message of “change” (as if the first woman Vice President wouldn’t be a dramatic change). Yes, the all-important Democratic message. I remember Gore’s carefully crafted “I’m my own man” message and Kerry’s carefully crafted “I’m a war hero” message. I also remember that the Republicans simply figured out a way to win and pulled it off in whatever way they could. Silly me…I thought elections were about winning!

The question I’ve been asking myself as our country has suffered for the last eight years, and the question I ask now, is…when will this lesson finally be learned?

The good news is, doing what it takes to win provides its own message…one that is much, much more powerful. It’s a unique, inherent and obvious message that would resonate with Obama Democrats and Clinton Democrats alike, and bring along a great number of independents too:


Sixteen years of Obama/Clinton Democratic rule in the White House, and our country saved from the brink of Republican-fueled disaster.

There’s your winning message, Senator Obama. And with that, my argument for Vice President Hillary Clinton comes to a close.

Read full story · Comments are closed

A Conversation with Al Gore

The Assault on Reason
by Al Gore


In a snide comment about Al Gore's new book, Tony
Snow said this
today: “I don’t know if they’re
going to do a reprinting of the book to try to get the facts straight. The fact-checkers
may have to take a look at it.”

Ahem. Oh, the irony. Oh, what an easy pitch.

This afternoon in a blogger call with former Vice President Al Gore, he didn't miss a beat responding.



“This book, unlike the President's State of the Union Address,
has been fact-checked.”
– Vice President Al Gore

Score one for Gore.

Needless to say it was a remarkable conversation, talking about Al Gore's new
book, The Assault on Reason. We even got to talk to him before Larry
King, where he'll be tonight.

The
whole conversation, a full hour, is taped for you to listen. Enjoy.
(Note: I've been doing some tech changes, so my voice is a bit louder and couldn't be fixed in time for the call. But the audio is good.)

It was quite an opportunity, with all of the questions thought provoking, which you'll hear in the audio. Not
a single blogger asked Gore the Sawyer question: Are you running in '08, blah-blah-blah.
Repeat question and recycle it again. Oh, and no questions about how much weight
he has lost either. We know our jobs even if the corporate hack pack does not.

I asked him a tough question on Iraq, which most are these days. Gore had been traveling all morning, which I knew, so it was impossible for him to know the details, but it was important to get his take on what was developing on the Iraq spending bill.


“I have enormous respect for Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid and how the new majority
is trying conscientiously to come to grips with the power of the legislative
branch; how to wield it in a way that validates the mandate they received
from the American people to bring about a change, especially in this catastrophically
mistaken war policy. The instruments available to the legislative branch are
blunt instruments, often difficult to use, awkward in their executions. And
I think there has to, there should be an appreciation for how difficult it
is to wield these tools. I think that they have been doing a really conscientious
job of trying to use these blunt instruments deftly. I don't know what the
latest twists and turns are, but I have confidence in their bona fides and
intentions and I wish them well.” – Vice President Al Gore

I followed up:


TM: How do you combat it when the media comes back and says the Democrats
caved?

GORE: Well, the hypothetical presumes that they did and I don't know that
they are.

TM: So, you just come back with that?

(insert laughter here)

GORE: Are you convinced that that's what's happening?

TM: No, no, absolutely not, I'm saying it's already starting in the media
to say that is what's happening–

GORE: Even before it actually happens?

TM: Pretty much already, in the headlines.

GORE: I, well… you know… –insert priceless moment here–

It's right about here you really need to hear the tape. It
was, well, classic
(cont.
here
).

I got to ask a second question that was also on my mind. Gore has a chapter
in his book entitled Assault on the Individual. It brought to mind
for me the GOP debate and the talk of torture.


TM: “When you talk about the 'assault on reason,' I think of the GOP
debate where Mitt Romney said 'double Guantanamo.' And you've got a chapter
in your book, I was looking at it, called The Assault on the Individual. I
was wondering if you'd talk a little bit about that and just Gitmo and the
torture thing and where the Republicans stand and where we stand today that
presidential candidates can stand up there and say 'double Gitmo,' and the
audience erupts in applause.”

You simply must hear
Vice President Al Gore's response
, because it goes to the heart of his book.
It's about the very fundamentals of our country and how America was founded
and upon what values and ideals. Those values and ideals have nothing to do
with the Republican idea that torture has anything to do with our democratic
republic or that a double Gitmo would be George Washington's idea of America.


“I put my heart and soul into this book. … What this book is is
an effort to really lay out, not only a diagnosis but also a prescription.
Those of you on this call are part of the group in America that I do see as
on the cutting edge of the change I hope is coming on strong.”
– Vice
President Al Gore

It was a remarkable hour, especially on this very tough day. It reminds you that politics is a worthy means by which to change this country, as well as hold our politicians accountable. Gore's book also just might show us the road back. Because we've lost so much in these last years under George W. Bush and the Republicans. It might be a beginning back to the road where America began. Al Gore offers hope. What we do with it is up to us.

A
conversation with Al Gore on his book The Assault on Reason.

(The full hour.)

Read full story · Comments are closed

Al Gore is a Winner


Classic. He started talking then the orchestra interrupted. The announcement that was never going to come was on everyone\’s mind. It still is.

Al Gore\’s
exciting win
at the Oscars was such a feel good moment. I hope a lot of
people head over to Climate Crisis
tonight.

Then, of course, came Scorsese.

But it truly was Al Gore, who once again proved why he is such a favorite with
so many of us. He\’s passionate and just not as calculating, and yes, I\’m talking
about Hillary Clinton, but a little about Mr. Obama, too. Let me digress for
a moment. Going back to the Geffen – Bill and Hillary smackdown, Obama would
have been fine if he\’d stopped here:
\”It\’s not clear to me why I would be apologizing for someone else\’s
remarks,\” Mr. Obama said, responding to the first question by Radio Iowa\’s
O\’Kay Henderson. \”My sense is that Mr. Geffen may have differences with
the Clintons, but that doesn\’t really have anything to do with our campaign.\”
Instead, he added on to that statement on Friday, saying he hoped they
could get beyond it all and talk about the issues, because he didn\’t want his campaign to get sidetracked. Too late. It was backtracking. It was also
calculating, because he and his team realized they\’d stepped into an argument that neither Clinton nor he won. But Obama should have left it alone. Anyway…

Gore is not a perfect politician by any estimation, but he has the passion about an issue that\’s
so important, plus the intelligence on foreign policy and military matters that\’s simply unquestioned. He would make the Democratic field very nervous if he entered and he\’d wipe the Republicans out. He\’d make me ecstatic. But I just don\’t think he will. His life is very good right now. But it\’s not impossible
or at least I\’m holding the door open for him, even if he never walks through
it. A girl can dream.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Naked Justices

It had been an unusually long, hard and acrimonious day at the Supreme Court.  The Great Halls still reverberated with echoes of arguments brought on by the historical closeness of the presidential election of 2000.  Opinions rendered, written and delivered, one
can only imagine (and even fantasize) about the lingering aftermath
of what was obviously a philosophically contentious debate…

“You bitch!  How can you possibly agree with those federalist hypocrites? 
States rights, my ass.” cries Justice Ginsburg.  “Besides, don’t
you realize what they really think of us?  Don’t you know they can
barely tolerate having us on the Court?  How badly do you want to
retire, anyway?”

“Oh, shut up, you little pipsqueak.  I’m the Queen Bitch of this
or any other Court, and I’ll do whatever I damn well please with
my ‘effing opinions,” Justice O’Connor shoots back indignantly.

“Fuck me,” exhales Justice Ginsburg to no one in particular.  “When
that arrogant loon Rehnquist retires, do you realize we’ll be stuck
with that delusionally omnipotent, egotistical moralist Scalia as
Chief Justice.  He’s going to be insufferable to deal with for decades,”
she says dejectedly.

“Hmm. I think he’s kind of cute and so strong, in a controlling,
Italian sort of way,” confesses O’Connor.

“Oh, lord.  Where’s my Xanax, moans Ginsburg.

Loud noises are heard from outside Justice O’Connor’s office.

“What the hell?” asks Ginsburg.

“Is that hammering?” asks O’Connor.

Ginsburg goes to the door, with O’Connor following close behind. 
They peer down the Great Hall in the direction of the noise.

All they can see is Justice Stevens directing construction that
is focused on his office doorway.  Finally, he ducks underneath
the electrical wiring that is hanging across his threshold, taking
a remote control with him into his office sanctuary.  Electronic
equipment packaging is seen close by, the labeling on the boxes
reading, “Don’t be caught off guard.  Protect yourself from invaders
with Ramrod.  The only office security system that is guaranteed
to keep unwanted interlopers out, while you remain securely in charge
and serenely safe inside.”

“I’ll be damned if those panty waste, puritanical, closet perv
nut jobs are going to usurp my authority.  The Republicans
will get me out of this office when pigs fly!  George W. can kiss
my judicial ass.  I didn’t like his father and I’m not about to
give that twit of a son of his a chance…No way… They’ll have to
pry these robes out of my cold, dead hands,” rants Justice Stevens!

The door slams behind him.  Lights flash around the door jam, first
in bright green, then a sound is heard as the door locks tightly
and the lights go out, leaving only the comforting sound of electrical
humming.  A workman motions for the Justices to stand back.  He
tosses his pencil at the door.  Immediately alarms go off and the
door starts flashing, a voice warning, “Stand back!  This is Ramrod. 
If you move towards the entry of this room you will be stopped.”

“Is that Chuck Heston’s voice?” asks Justice O’Connor.  “He is
so sexy.”

The workman smiles at O’Connor, packs up his equipment, then walks
down the hall and out of sight.

“Yum-my,” she gushes.

“Oh, please, Sandra.  Get a grip on yourself,” admonishes Ginsburg.

Laughter is suddenly heard from the other end of the hall, as someone
begins moving towards them, but it’s too far away to see exactly
who it is.  Immediately the female Justices notice that there isn’t
just one person, but seem to be two… No, three people moving towards
them.  They aren’t walking directly down the hall, however.  They
seem to be darting in and out of offices one at a time, zigzagging
back and forth across the Great Hall.  As they approach the two
female Justices the laughter gets louder and louder and louder.

“What the…” Justice Ginsburg begins, but stops herself short of
finishing her sentence.  She stands speechless.

O’Connor remains mute watching the approaching spectacle, then
slowly begins to smile until she can no longer contain herself,
breaking into a chortling cackle.

Ginsburg backs away cautiously, but the look in her eye gives away
that she knows what is about to happen.

The darting threesome have made it down the Great Hall and are
finally face to face with their female colleagues.  The three men
are buck naked, wearing nothing but a smile, each holding a bottle
of booze.  Without hesitation, Justice Scalia walks directly over
to O’Connor and hands her his bottle of champagne.  Rehnquist drifts
passed them and further down the hall, giggling as he goes.  Justice
Thomas stands back against the Great Wall of the Great Hall leering
at the Italian and the Irish woman.  Licking his lips, he begins
fondling himself.  The Italian and Irish share a smile, a sip, then
Scalia dips O’Connor, planting a big wet one on her lips.

“Now that wasn’t so hard, was it, big guy,” oozes Thomas.

“Come on, come on, you guys!  Let’s go.  We’ve got to find Kennedy,”
Rehnquist states excitedly, barely able to contain himself.

“You coming?” asks Justice Scalia with a smile.

“Will you be patient?  Will you let me give the orders?” queries
O’Connor.

“Oh, Justice.  I’ve been waiting to hear those words from you for
so long,” admits Antonin, a quiver in his voice.

“It’s so fitting that this election would finally bring us…” but
O’Connor just couldn’t finish the thought.

“Oh, my god!  I think I’m going to be sick,” grumbles Justice Ginsburg,
who abruptly turns and begins yelling at Justice Stevens through
his Ramrod door.  “Let me in!  Let me in!  You’ve got to let me
in.  Don’t leave me out here with these interloping hypocrites!”

A buzz is heard.  Ginsburg walks through Stevens’ door, and we
catch a glimpse of the interior.  They’re not alone.  Justices Breyer
and Souter can be seen at a table passing a bottle of Johnny Walker
Black between them.  Breyer is holding his head.  The door closes
to Stevens’ office, the lights go green, then out, then the familiar
hum is heard.

“Are you ready?” asks Justice Scalia.

“I’ve been waiting for this moment for eight years!” exclaims O’Connor.

Justice Rehnquist appears down the hall, poking his head from around
the corner of Justice Kennedy’s office.

“Come on, you guys.  Kennedy’s got the VCR all hooked up.  We can
watch the concession from down here!”

The naked Scalia and the cloaked O’Connor walk towards the randy
Rehnquist.  Justice Thomas brings up the rear.

“This ought to be the last time those loser liberals spout off
about us.  We’re gonna take this country by storm… one state at
a time,” Thomas croaks under his breath.  “Who’s the smart one now,
mother—-?”

The Justices head off down the hall, slowly and deliberately, with
Scalia and Thomas’s backside in full view, and O’Connor now positioned
between the Italian and the Womanizer.  A door is heard opening
behind them, but they don’t seem to notice anything but their own
euphoria.

Justices Ginsburg, Stevens, Souter and Brower poke their heads
out and watch the threesome walk away.

“Boy, would I love to be a fly on the wall in that room,” states
Souter.

“Not to worry,” says Brower.  “Rehnquist had the whole building
wired for sight and sound.  There’s nothing we do that he can’t
see or hear, and I’ve got the keys to the controls.  He doesn’t
know jack about technology!”

“If the people only knew,” muses Ginsburg, as the Four Justices
retreat once again into their Ramrod safety.  The door seals one
last time, as the lights go green, and the hum of electronic security
is heard throughout the hall.

Down in Justice Kennedy’s office a phone rings.

“Chief Justice, it’s for you.  It’s the president, junior, that
is.  He wants to thank you,” informs Kennedy with a smile.

The Justices stand back, Kennedy and O’Connor cloaked in their
regal costumes, with Scalia and Thomas posing proudly in their undress,
as they watch their naked Chief Justice amble over to take the phone
call they were all expecting.

“Finally,” exhales Rehnquist.  “A little appreciation.”

“Fuckin’ A,” says Thomas.

The five Justices are left alone, but very much together.  One
speaking to the president elect.  Two enjoying pleasures denied
for so long, and another left to look at a tape showing George W.
Bush blowing verbal smoke up the judicial posteriors of Justices
Scalia and Thomas.

“You’re welcome, Mr. President,” clucks the naked Chief Justice
Rehnquist.

It is so ordered.

Read full story · Comments are closed

The Ding-a-ling Factor

Proudly he stands, his head held high, a confident look on his
face, his square jaw set in the sure-fire knowledge that he knows
his destiny, is his own man.  His T-shirt fits him handsomely, the
blue denim shirt flapping in the outdoor air, as he stands on top
of the hill he has recently taken.  His khakis fit securely, snugly
tugging at his… Whoa, hello Al.  Never has one magazine cover picture
caused such a stir before it appeared on newsstands.  If Rolling Stones' November issue, preceded by the October issue
that questioned Dubya’s intelligence (or lack there of), doesn’t
make voters recognize Veep Gore, nothing will.  Even if people don’t
read the article they’ll get a powerful image of our potential president
by way of his pulchritudinous package.  How proud Tipper must be
of her man, and how lucky, considering Al sleeps in the buff.  Obviously,
he’s just too big to be hemmed in!  At least that’s what Rush
Limbaugh suggested last week on two consecutive days on his morning
talk radio show (10.19 and 10.20.00). Once again, it’s the Republican
right that is so intent on making sexuality a potent political issue. 
NationalReview.com
helps prove this point, as Starr's scandal legacy lives on.

First the background… Joy Behar of ABC’s “The View,” in a humorous exchange that Mr. Limbaugh aired in
part on his radio show, asked her audience if they’d seen the picture
of Vice President Al Gore on the cover of Rolling Stone.  Demurring in language, Ms.
Behar made it clear that this photograph showed a very well endowed
Veep, which she felt was sure to swing women voters to Gore in a
big way.  The View's mostly female audience whooped in response
to further comments from Ms. Behar, as she intimated that more than
Gore’s persona is stiff. Mr. Limbaugh talked an entire morning
(10.19.00) about Ms. Behar’s comments and the cover picture of Gore,
including that the Veep was so manly that Rolling Stone had
to significantly air brush Al’s package.  In fact, rumor has it
that Al’s package was so large that it had to be retouched down! 
Rumors abound on exactly who floated the “airbrush” bit of the story. 
The Republicans will probably end up complaining that Gore's package
wasn’t touched down enough.

The main subject of Mr. Limbaugh’s show, however, and I’m paraphrasing
here, was that if women can be swayed by a kiss and a well endowed
man, why should we be taken seriously as voters or thinking individuals. 
Is he kidding?  Men have been drooling, falling over and chasing
after naked women for centuries and they manage to run the world. 
There are few men who can resist a quick glance or comment about
a woman's big breasts or exposed gams or both.  The fox factor has
always been a burden to many women, especially ones that are less
attractive.

Men have been judged solely on their money and status for far too
long.  It’s about time we got down to the package persona of it
all.  When a man is stripped of his armor, his money and the power
of his trappings, what is left?  What has he got to show when he’s
standing there vulnerable and naked before us?  Ask any woman (and
some men).  What a man is packing matters, even if she won’t
admit it openly, but the bottom line of this argument is about quid
pro quo.  Women now have the freedom to comment on endowments,
virility and physical prowess with equal fervor to men.  How do
you like it, boys?  Well, evidently Rush Limbaugh doesn’t like it
or is threatened by it (or both).  What's more important is that
he missed the entire point by focusing on his rival’s cock sure
persona.  At one point, Rush went so far as to play “My Ding-a-ling”
by Chuck Berry, to which I laughed so hard I’d thought I’d choke. 
It was an unbelievable moment in radio history.  I have no doubt
that Senator Lieberman and Mr. Bill Bennett would have presented
this particular Limbaugh show with their damning Silver
Sewer award
.

A woman makes a sexist comment on television, something that men
have been doing for decades.  The female audience responds because
it’s so deliciously naughty to subject smarty pants Al to sexual
objectification. It makes his wooden appearance stand for something
human, makes him more Clintonesque, which is a very good thing at
this point. It was a joke amongst a gaggle of gals that have
been on the receiving end of these types of jokes for an eternity. 
It was sorority swagger on stage.  Then a right wing media star
hears about it, including the story supposedly that the photo was
“airbrushed down,” and all the right wing guy can talk about is
presidential packaging.  He doesn’t even take a moment to look at
the Rolling Stone cover picture with a fresh eye.  Immediately
the right wing starts throwing rocks without realizing they fell
for the trap.

It’s the alpha male factor, folks.  Posed in his outdoor ensemble,
Al Gore looks as if he’s perched on top of his mountain, commandeering
his surroundings, his world and our country.  It’s the meat of the
man, boys and girls, with Al in all his environmental, outdoorsy,
woodsman glory.  After months of Naomi Wolf type handlers telling
him how to be, when to be and what to be, Al Gore as pictured on
the cover of Rolling Stone looks like a man in charge.  I
hope the third debate ignited something in the Gore campaign (according
to WashingtonPost.com,
they’re buying cable air time to re-air it!), deciding to take their
candidate for what he is, finally realizing that he might be more
alpha male than previously expected.

Al’s big feet, big hands, big… was something that could have
only gotten steam through the right wing, who has a fatal Starr
complex.  The cover picture is an ode to the Gucci
ad that first made news in Vanity Fair
, showing the
physique of a well endowed, happily erect male whose head is cut
off.  It’s a homage to the old saying a picture is worth a thousand
words.  It’s a trap for the Republicans who can’t get their minds
off of other peoples’ sexuality.  Mr. Limbaugh, in his rush to find
the sexual side, misses the entire intent of this cover picture. The real alpha issue is that they knew this picture of Gore would
naturally appeal to women due to his rugged naturalness, but their
intent was to boost Gore's appeal with men, which lags behind Bush,
and help young people identify him.  In this cover picture Gore
presents himself as a man’s man.

Mr. Limbaugh and his Republican flock couldn’t resist bringing
in the sex quotient, because the polls say the nation is more concerned
about restoring morality than in economics right now.  Ironically,
the only way Limbaugh can hype their candidate is by saying he’s
a nice guy who tells good jokes at banquets (10.20.00).  The
stories that appeared in the press at the close of last week all
speculate on whether President Clinton will join the campaign. 
The press, the democrats and an interested public all wonder if
Clinton will join the fray, all the while there are competing stories,
including this WashingtonPost.com
article, stating Gore’s aids want him to maintain his distance from
his boss.

The Republicans are petrified that Clinton will enter the equation
and inspire the democratic base.  To keep Clinton a liability, Limbaugh
even managed to tie Lewinsky back into the race, using the Rolling
Stone
cover as rope.  Rush suggested on Friday (10.20.00)
that Clinton might even be jealous of Al’s Rolling Stone
persona, because Paula Jones said supposedly said Clinton’s package
was nothing to write home about!  The Republicans’ worst nightmare
is Clinton campaigning for the Democrats,
so their rank and file minions are bringing back scandal to scare
the Gore people into making a huge mistake.

NOTE TO AL, et al:
You cannot win without The
Man.

Clinton will ignite your base.

Make the call.

Speculating what could be airbrushed for Bush, the comment on radio
was that Dubya would need a brain airbrushed in, which is (and should
be) the real issue in this campaign.  Using Rush’s chosen theme
song of the week as premise, Is Dubya really a ding-a ling?  Once
again, you only have to view Slate.com's “Dueling Dubya's” to be reminded of the Governor's profound
ineptitude.  Juxtaposing one presidential candidate that seems affable
but dangerously dimwitted, against his brainy opponent pictured
with his presidential packaging in full view is a particularly humiliating
pop culture indictment for Republicans.  It’s the ding-a-ling factor,
with the
election hanging in the balance
of which ding-a-ling factor
matters most?  Will it be Dubya’s “aw shucks” factor or Al’s alpha
aggressive smarts?  Will the people pick style or substance? 
This is spectacular subject matter to be pondering, whether we want
a nice or smart president.  The potency of both presidential
candidates is in full swing these last two weeks.  It’s the politics
of sex
engorged.

Does it matter that women are commenting, even reveling in Gore’s
sexuality as shown through the
kiss
and his package persona? As if a woman can’t appreciate
a great bulge while simultaneously understanding health care issues. 
Women are the kings of multitasking and layered thought processing. 
Right wing men and some others throw stones at sexually liberated
women, because they’re uncomfortable with the quid pro quo of equally
sexist comments, not understanding that we can be filled with lust
one minute and deal with fiscal responsibility the next.  Anything
you can do we can do, too (well, almost).  In the end, modern women
care deeply about issues and have more passion for men who respect
a woman’s right to her own independent opinions and actions, which
sometimes come sexually charged.  Three whoops for our rock ‘n
roll Vice President, Al Gore, and a yee-ha to Rolling Stone
for not only picturing him at his alpha best, but for making candidate
Al Gore seem manly human.  William Jefferson Clinton has got
to be oh, so proud.

Make the call, Al.  Make
the call
.

Read full story · Comments are closed