TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Tag Archives | economics

“Hallelujah Corporations!” and other messages from the 99%

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

From the OWS Twitter feed: “pdjmoo HALLELUJAH CORPORATIONS – A musical tribute to corporate excess in the style of the Capitol Steps YouTube ow.ly/87j4e #occupy #OWS” and from You Tube link: “Hallelujah was conceived, rehearsed and filmed in Tamworth, NH, a small town with a population of 2556 … . Tamworth is part of Occupy The Mt Washington Valley.” Sung to “The Hallelujah Chorus,” it begins:

Corporations, Corporations,
We’re so happy, We’re so sunny
’Cause we have money.
Corporations, Corporations,
We get our share and we don’t care
If it’s not fair.
For the Supreme Court of our great nation, made
us people, made us human, made us persons,
Corporations!

“bored2tears #Occupy protesters target Rose Parade, will be allowed to march after all the floats have gone. lat.ms/tkG2Gy”

“affinistim RT @OccupyWallStNYC: Join #OWS & #VeteransForPeace 2morrow: donating books, food, & good cheer. 7-8:30pm, 63 W. 124 pastebin.com/QbFtdE3h”

“Leialadi RT @SangyeH: RT @Yago32: Download it for FREE twitpic.com/7wcw0f post it all over. Spread the world, & Merry Christmas #OWS #ANONYMOUS #OCCUPY [1 in 5 hungry poster]”

“brodifaabs RT @arnoldogarcia: ‘Three arrested, accused of illegally feeding homeless’ They must have been communists. thesent.nl/kBYNKv”

“CaraFlamenca RT @OccupyWallStNYC: ‘Civil Disobedience becomes a Sacred Duty when the State is Corrupt’ Gandhi”

“zoisinterested RT @MotherJones: #Occupy’s Next Target: The Iowa Caucus mojo.ly/u79cIU”

“minotauresse RT @OWSLibrary: Want 2 share some spirit this season? Bring food, books, clothing & people 2 Zuccotti on Xmas day! 100th day of #OWS is D25 #OccupyChristmas”

“SketchySyn RT @Rigo_AP: And the truth… Shall, land you in prison. #Ndaa #Ows.”

“michellepujals ‘A small body of determined spirits fired by an unquenchable faith in their mission can alter the course of history.’ Mahatma Gandhi #ows.”

“arbarellany RT @MotherJones: #Occupy’s Next Target: The Iowa Caucus mojo.ly/u79cIU #OWS.”

“janesherd RT 1984 was not supposed to be an instruction manual #ows #occupy #NDAA #SOPA #censorship t.co/eMolE … bit.ly/uGJ1OZ.”

“RockstrNinjaGrl RT @elektrosoundwav: LOLOLOL RT @OccupyNCSU RT: @JoshHarkinson: Bankers & billionaires try to form a movement against #OWS: motherjones.com/mojo/2011/12/b…”

“WarrenIsMad RT @YourAnonNews: ‘Grandma Got Indefinitely Detained’ Parody video — youtube.com/watch?v=ek1uqr… << Bwahahahahaha!! #NDAA”

“NWHippieGoddess RT @truthout: Richard D. Wolff: ‘The solution for this denial of democracy is to Occupy the Corporation.’ bit.ly/utRd0X #OWS”

I thought having just the words and photos from various Occupied people and places was a bit of a treat. And whatever holiday you celebrate, or if you don’t celebrate one at all, hope you all have a great weekend.

(1 in 5 Children Hungry via TwitPic.
Presence Not Presents via OccupySeattle.
Protect Democracy Not Plutocracy via Occupy LA
Christmas Tree and Tent via Occupy Oregon. )

Read full story · Comments { 2 }

Occupy polls higher than Congress

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

Polling is a snapshot, or a series of snapshots, that provide some idea of what people are thinking. In this case, I’m looking at some polling numbers about Congress, Obama, Occupy, big government, and big business.

When it comes to Congress, the thinking is clear, and it’s part of the context for understanding the Occupy / 99% movement. First, from Gallup, released December 19:

A new record-low 11% of Americans approve of the job Congress is doing, the lowest single rating in Gallup’s history of asking this question since 1974. This earns Congress a 17% yearly average for 2011, the lowest annual congressional approval rating in Gallup history. …

The current 86% disapproval rating for Congress is the highest in Gallup history, two percentage points higher than the 84% recorded in August.

Another Gallup poll, “Dec. 12-18, Obama Approve 42%, Disapprove 50%.”

A third poll from Gallup, released December 12:

Americans’ concerns about the threat of big government continue to dwarf those about big business and big labor, and by an even larger margin now than in March 2009. The 64% of Americans who say big government will be the biggest threat to the country is just one percentage point shy of the record high, while the 26% who say big business is down from the 32% recorded during the recession. Relatively few name big labor as the greatest threat.

A fourth, released December 15, also from Gallup:

Americans are now less likely to see U.S. society as divided into the ‘haves’ and ‘have nots’ than they were in 2008, returning to their views prior to that point. A clear majority, 58%, say they do not think of America in this way, after Americans were divided 49% to 49% in the summer of 2008.

The same poll showed that, “The majority would put themselves in the ‘haves’ category if they had to choose.” Obviously this is nothing but a guess on my part, that there’s a relationship, but this reminds me of the tendency for people to identity as “middle class” when, in fact, incomes don’t reflect that.

Turning to the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, released December 15:

Public discontent with Congress has reached record levels … . Two-in-three voters say most members of Congress should be voted out of office in 2012 – the highest on record. And the number who say their own member should be replaced matches the all-time high recorded in 2010, when fully 58 members of Congress lost reelection bids – the most in any election since 1948.

The Republican Party is taking more of the blame than the Democrats for a do-nothing Congress. A record-high 50% say that the current Congress has accomplished less than other recent Congresses, and by nearly two-to-one (40% to 23%) more blame Republican leaders than Democratic leaders for this. …

In “lesser of two evils” framing, that’s a win for Democrats – the kind of “win” that helps perpetuate the Duopoly.

In the same Pew poll, Occupy Wall Street was also considered.

The arguments and concerns of the Occupy Wall Street movement are supported by many Americans, but most continue to reject the core conclusion that America is divided into a nation of ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots.’ Moreover, while the Occupy Wall Street movement draws more support than opposition, its tactics are criticized, with far more saying they disapprove than approve of the way the protests have been carried out.

By a 44% to 35% margin, more Americans support than oppose the Occupy Wall Street movement overall, and by 48% to 30%, more say they agree than disagree with the concerns the protests have raised. But when it comes to the way the protests are being conducted, significantly more disapprove (49%) than approve (29%).

The poll included some of the specific concerns and issues raised by OWS.

Many of the themes of the Occupy Wall Street protests resonate with the public. About half (51%) say that Wall Street hurts the American economy more than it helps it; 36% are of the view that Wall Street helps more than it hurts. A 61% majority say the economic system in this country unfairly favors the wealthy, while 36% say it is generally fair to most Americans. And fully 77% say that a few rich people and corporations have too much power in this country. While still a minority view, the current survey finds 40% saying that hard work and determination are no guarantee of success, higher than in any other survey conducted over the past 17 years.

The “haves” and “have-nots” question was also raised:

… most Americans (58%) continue to reject the notion that American society is divided into two groups, the ‘haves’ and the ‘have-nots.’ And when pressed to choose, more Americans describe themselves as part of the ‘haves’ (46%) than the ‘have-nots’ (39%).

I wish there was a poll that asked those who agree with the “arguments and concerns” of OWS but disagree with the tactics what they suggest instead. That’s not snark, but a serious wish. I’m really interested in other ideas. Occupy is, as I keep saying, evolving, and as their tactics evolve, the agreements and disagreements could change, too. Polls really aren’t the best vehicle for this, but questions to which I’d like to hear answers include: If you don’t like what’s being done, what are some alternatives, some specific ideas? How would you change things? Try new ideas? Rework some old ones? Would you be willing to work with Occupy / 99 percenters? Would you be willing to compromise, cooperate? Would you work only within the Two Party System? Only without? Some of both?

Anyway, latest polling shows Congress’ overall approval at 11%, Obama’s at 42%, and Occupy at 44%.

(OWS Polling graph via Pew Research )

Read full story · Comments { 4 }

“This moment of deep social crisis”: Council of Elders and Occupy

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

I’ve written about the Council of Elders earlier, in Occupying an Icon, and about the denied request of OWS to Trinity Real Estate / Trinity Episcopal Church to use a vacant lot for an Occupy encampment in “Wake up”: Occupy at three months and “Occupy denounces local Democratic Party endorsement”.

The Council of Elders wrote Trinity about the Occupy request, here via OWS. I know it’s a rather long quote, but I think these “elders” are a very important voice.

We are veterans of the Civil Rights, Women’s, Peace, Environmental, LGBTQ, Immigrant Justice, labor rights and other movements of the last 60 years. Many of us have been or continue to be leaders of religious congregations and organizations, so we are deeply understanding of the need to protect the spaces and buildings that generations of the faithful have transmitted to us.

We are also deeply committed to using the share of God’s abundance that has been entrusted to us for the help and healing of those “least of these” – the poor, the humiliated, the hungry, the homeless, the dis-empowered –whom God has called us to protect.

We have special understandings of both of those commitments because as leaders of the social-change movements of the 20th century we have been called to deploy resources for the sake of racial and social justice and the cause of peace. Today we see the Occupy movement as efforts by a new generation of (mostly young) people to move forward as we did toward fuller justice and democracy for the diverse peoples in our nation.

We are concerned to hear that Occupy Wall Street has asked Trinity Church for use of the Lent-Space on 6th and Canal to gather, and has been refused.

We are especially moved to hear that the Episcopal Cathedral of Boston has invited the Occupy movement there to gather in its space.

We know that some question the need for Occupy to continue to occupy physical space but we have witnessed the impact of communal, inspirational, face-to-face contact in which people can be visible to the world and to one another. … In a world where the majority of our nation is oppressed by economic and racial inequality, experiencing isolation and dehumanization at every turn, the Occupy movement in its public presence has provided hope and purpose and a pressing challenge to us all.

We urge you to reexamine the possibilities in the light of the importance of Occupy Wall Street as a spark of God’s ‘Burning Bush’ in this moment of deep social crisis. We urge you to approve the use of this sacred space for a sacred purpose – the pursuit of justice in America.

The letter is signed by the Organizing Committee, Council of Elders: Marian Wright Edelman, John Fife, James (Mel) White, Nelson Johnson, Arthur Waskow, Joyce Johnson, Sr. Joan Chittister, James M. Lawson, Jr., Vincent T. Harding, Phillip J. Lawson, Dolores Huerta, Bernice Reagon Johnson, Grace Lee Boggs, Gwendolyn Zoharah Simmons, and George Tinker.

“This moment of deep social crisis” and “The pursuit of justice in America.” That’s one of the best summaries of why the Occupy / 99% movement came into existence and continues to evolve that I’ve heard. There is a deep, wide, expanding crisis for millions. Lose your job, be unable to find another one within six months or so, and you have a mark against you in the job market. Be unable to find full time employment for a year or two, and the marks are bigger and probably permanent. Trust the professionals who assured you the mortgage you were being offered was good, find out how wrong that was and join the millions foreclosed upon, and you have a mark against you. If you were fortunate enough to have health insurance to begin with, but lost it along with your job, and you have a mark against you. Graduate from college at a time of high unemployment, be unable to get a job in your field, and you have a mark against you. Bump into the racial, gender, economic, orientation and other existing prejudices, and you have a mark against you, and “the pursuit of justice” becomes a bigger uphill climb.

You don’t have to agree with the faith perspectives of the Elders in order to agree, to whatever extent, with their decades long commitments to the pursuit of justice. What the Council is talking about is human rights, including the basics of shelter, food, clothing, a way to make a living, access to health care. It includes the basics of fairness and justice and equality. What the Council is doing, in itself, is providing another “basic” need: voices speaking out to name the injustices.

I hope those who recognize and accept the accuracy of what The Council of Elders is saying – the “deep social crisis” – but who do not think Occupy is the answer, will find other ways to pursue justice.

(Housekeeping note: computer challenges continue, and so my ability to read and respond to your comments. I will read all as soon as possible. Keep talking, please.)

(Council of Elders photo via OWS
Council of Elders letterhead via OWS)

Read full story · Comments { 5 }

“Occupy denounces local Democratic Party endorsement”

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

The ways the Occupy movement continues to play out are a kind of primer on grassroots organizing. Agree or disagree with messages and/or methods, there is no doubt that activists are successfully forcing the attention of media, public, and political parties. A few recent examples follow.

The ongoing questions regarding the relationship between the Occupy movement and the Democratic Party – and the 2012 elections – show up in multiple ways, and not just in larger Occupation sites.

In Murfreesboro, TN, Occupy denounces local Democratic Party endorsement:

Occupy Murfreesboro protesters quickly distanced themselves Friday from the local Democratic Party, contending that although the support is appreciated, they do not want to be co-opted into partisan politics.

‘A few people from the Democratic Party should not try to ideologically represent the entire Occupy movement,’ said Matthew Hamill, who serves as a media liaison for Occupy Murfreesboro. …

‘What is important for Occupy Murfreesboro is continued opposition to the two-party system’s hold on political power, here and across the nation,’ (Middle TN State Un. student Jase) Short said. ‘Wall Street has one party with two faces: the Democrats and Republicans alike.’

The blowback comes only days after Executive Committee member Joan Hill sponsored a resolution endorsing Occupy Murfreesboro. …

‘I know that the Occupy movement does not consider itself to be political, but we want to stand in solidarity with the Murfreesboro protesters,’ said Hill, an education representative and attorney for United Steelworkers International. …

‘We don’t want to label ourselves as the Democratic Party or Republican Party,’ (Hamill) … said, ‘and we definitely don’t want them to co-opt a movement just because the elections are coming up.’

About different strategies employed by Occupiers, from Occupy Educated:

Is standing up, interrupting, and getting kicked out of a meeting a good direction for Occupy? It’s the new trend and has been showing up at conventions, meetings, and fundraisers worldwide. One form of such crashings, known as mic checking, makes use of the #OWS People’s Mic technique. The most inspiring early example, perhaps, was the mic checking of the NYC Department of Education board meeting done by Occupy Wall Street in October … .

Such interruptions aren’t a strategy originating with Occupy, of course, as the article points out with the example of Code Pink, which interrupted congressional hearings and the Republican National Convention, among other events.

What do you think? Is this a good way for marginalized voices to be heard? Do drastic times call for drastic action to get messages out, or is this just unproductive?

Other examples of “mic checks” include (via YouTube) Occupy ‘Messenger’ Interrupts Congressional Deficit Super Committee Hearing’ and 99%ers Mic Check Newt Gingrich At Harvard. Two articles, one via Think Progress, Occupiers Crash Chamber Of Commerce Holiday Party With Human Red Carpet, and one via The Nation, JP Morgan Mic Checked At Princeton.

Using another action with a long history, Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., joined Occupiers in a hunger strike. Via Washington Examiner:

… Ellison ….. embarked on a 24-hour hunger strike in solidarity with four Occupy DC protesters who have gone without food since Dec. 8 to advocate for D.C. voting rights.

Ellison … met with the hunger strikers Thursday and pledged to read their declaration – which calls for full voting rights for District residents as well as legislative and budget autonomy – on the floor of the House of Representatives to enter it into the congressional record.

The hunger strikers have been meeting with various lawmakers and their staffers on Capitol Hill this week. Success has been mixed.

Finally, picking up on the Duarte Square and Trinity Episcopal Church story of a few days ago, via TruthOut:

A fence surrounds the vacant lot near Duarte Square, just next to the Holland Tunnel in downtown New York City, the signs fixed to it prohibiting trespassers from entering its confines. Inside the fence, though, there is nothing but a dirt lot. Nothing but a dirt lot has sat there for years, and nothing will sit there for at least a year more. Then, according to Trinity, the real estate corporation that owns the lot, a luxury skyscraper will go up. …

The problem is that Trinity is also an Episcopal church … . And as a church, it is expected by people of faith to serve as a charitable organization. So when Occupy Wall Street became homeless, a sensible route for Trinity to take might have been to offer the lot for temporary use, at least until the weather gets warm again. Not only did Trinity not offer the space, it flatly denied the occupation’s request and remained recalcitrant throughout negotiations, even as protesters began hunger strikes, even as local clergy united in pleading with Trinity to relent, even as Bishop George Packard, Chief Chaplin of the Episcopal Church, joined the suit.

You might remember that Archbishop Desmond Tutu sent a letter of solidarity for the planned action to occupy the vacant lot.

… Packard, the clergy, the hunger strikers and the rest of Occupy Wall Street decided to ignore the signs on the fence and scale the steel wire. …

Occupation 2.0 began.

And ended. Trinity called the cops who, clad in riot gear despite the complete lack of threat of a riot, shoved and tossed peaceable protesters out of their way in pursuit of the lot’s occupiers. There, they arrested the clergy, the hunger strikers, the occupiers and all, including Packard. What a sight to behold: a real estate corporation/Episcopal church, sending what the 12th richest man in America calls his ‘army’ in to bust the church’s Chief Chaplin.

Using the questions from the Occupy Educated article: “What do you think?” Are these various actions “good way(s) for marginalized voices to be heard?”

( Poster via Scriptonite Daily )

Read full story · Comments { 6 }

“Wake up”: Occupy at three months

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

I mentioned this yesterday, but want to highlight it again: tomorrow is OWS’ three month anniversary, and the “wake up” that provided continues to evolve. Via OWS:

On Saturday, December 17th Occupy Wall Street — with support from more than 1400 faith leaders, elders of the civil rights movement, prominent artists and community members — will gather at noon in Duarte Square, downtown Manhattan, for an all day performance event. This event is part of a call to re-occupy in the wake of the coordinated attacks and subsequent evictions of occupations across the nation and around the world. …

Canal and 6th Ave is the site of a vacant lot owned by Trinity Real Estate, the corporate arm of Trinity on Wall Street. Over the past month, since the eviction of Liberty Square (Zuccotti Park) on November 14th , members of the Occupy Wall Street movement with interfaith leaders, elders of the civil rights movement and artists have asked Trinity on Wall Street to do the right thing, and offer sanctuary to the movement in this vacant lot.

Related to that, from OWS:

A Message Of Solidarity From Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Sisters and Brothers, I greet you in the Name of Our Lord and in the bonds of common friendship and struggle from my homeland of South Africa. I know of your own challenges and of this appeal to Trinity Church for the shelter of a new home and I am with you! …

Yours is a voice for the world not just the neighborhood of Duarte Park. Injustice, unfairness, and the strangle hold of greed which has beset humanity in our times must be answered with a resounding, ‘No!’ You are that answer. … You see, the heartbeat of what you are asking for – that those who have too much must wake up to the cries of their brothers and sisters who have so little – beats in me and all South Africans who believe in justice.

Some of the actions being taken toward providing that “wake up”:

From OWS:

CHARAS served the low-income, activist, and artist communities of lower east side for over 20 years, providing artist’s space, performance and gallery space, after school programs, workshops, English classes and meeting space for countless neighborhood organizations. In 1999, despite a community use restriction & widespread opposition, the building that housed CHARAS was auctioned off to private developer Gregg Singer, who immediately moved to evict them. After a hard fought battle, CHARAS was evicted on December 27, 2001. The building, still zoned for community use, has sat vacant and derelict ever since. This Sunday, it’s time CHARAS gets their community center back!

Something in the early stages of developing, Occupy Educated:

Simply put, if you’re going to be Occupying anything, be Educated while doing so. Having a working knowledge of the issues and their root causes is essential to effectively communicating the need for change and formulating practical solutions. …

OccupyEducated provides a place for visitors to identify, share and discuss the systemic causes of the problems our society faces today, and then move on to implementing solutions. It is not our goal to tell anyone what to think, our goal is simply to give them access to information that makes them think.

… This is a place for people of all backgrounds, all political persuasions, and all demographics to come explore and discuss thought-provoking information and unite behind practical solutions. …

This is a very appealing idea to me, and I’ll definitely continue checking it out.

Another way people are sharing ideas, from The People’s Library:

Occupy Theory has been manifested as a new theory publication tidal. … The first issue even includes an essay by Judith Butler. And they’re looking for work for future issues so sit down and start theorizing!

You can access the first issue at the People’s Library link.

Also from The People’s Library, OWS Poetry Anthology Week 9 Update:

Week 9? has officially been added to the OWS Poetry Anthology. And I have exciting news! This December 17th, we’re launching a website for the OWS Poetry Anthology so it’s more easily accessible and ever more beautiful and free. The anthology will remain at the People’s Library WordPress page as a PDF but will also be at owspoetry.org as a more navigable version.

Projects continue to be created by which people can learn more not just about the Occupy movement itself, but about what’s motivating people to become involved. At Occupennial:

OWS via Manhattan Neighborhood Network

Turn on your TV for the latest Occupy News…

On the Community Channel:
TWC = 34
RCN = 82
FIOS = 33

There’s also a link to watch online.

Two other things from Occupennial – first Occupy Cinema at Anthology Film Archives:

Occupy Cinema is pleased to announce its co-organizing OCCUPY WALL STREET AT AFA with Anthology Film Archives. January 7 and 8 Anthology’s screens will feature a number of films related to the International Occupy movement … .”

Also from Occupennial:

Occupy!: Scenes from Occupied America

In the fall of 2011, a small protest camp in downtown Manhattan exploded into a global uprising, sparked in part by the violent overreactions of the police. An unofficial record of this movement, Occupy! combines adrenalin-fueled first-hand accounts of the early days and weeks of Occupy Wall Street with contentious debates and thoughtful reflections, featuring the editors and writers of the celebrated n+1, as well as some of the world’s leading radical thinkers, such as Slavoj Zizek, Angela Davis, and Rebecca Solnit.

Finally, there’s Occupy Records who are

creating a platform to facilitate the connection between artists and fans who are involved with or inspired by the global Occupy movement.

Many ways to hear, or refuse to hear, the “wake up” of and from the 99%.

(Occupy D17 poster via OWS.
Wake UP poster via Occupy Posters. )

Read full story · Comments { 4 }

Occupy Bill of Rights Day

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

At the 12-12 Port Shutdown, in Oakland, this sign appeared: “When injustice becomes law, protest becomes duty.”

That sign message seemed a good way to begin, since today is Bill of Rights Day, and since The National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 has passed with the “indefinite detention” language intact.

Via OWS:

The Bill of rights was ratified 220 years ago, on December 15, 1791. It is shameful that today, in the United States, we are forced to come together in defense of the Bill of Rights and our civil liberties, as the representatives of the 1% who rule this country continue to take our rights away.

Congress is attempting to bury the Bill of Rights. The National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (NDAA) includes language proposed by Democratic Sen. Carl Levin and Republican Sen. John McCain that allows for the arrest and indefinite detention of U.S. citizens by the military, on U.S. soil and without the right of trial. This … comes at a time when we are witnessing unprecedented attacks on our civil liberties.

Some of these attacks include:

Massive spying on the Muslim community … ; …

The recent raids on homes of antiwar activists by federal agents, who have carted away personal computers, cell phones, books, and other possessions and handed the activists subpoenas to appear before federal grand juries;

The recent, often violent evictions of anti-Wall Street occupations around the country;

The refusal of the Chicago city government and the federal government to allow for peaceful protests when NATO and the G8 countries come to Chicago in May, 2012 to hold summit meetings. …

More from Occupy Together:

Civil rights groups, counterterrorism experts and former military leaders have expressed serious concerns with sections of the NDAA which would effectively allow for the indefinite military detention of United States citizens and lawful immigrants in America … . A group of Lawmakers submitted a letter to House and Senate leaders stating their concerns of the possibility of these provisions undermining the rights of US citizens.

While adjustments have been made in backdoor meetings due to President Obama’s threat of veto, none of these primary concerns were directly addressed. The NDAA in its present form could still allow for an indefinite military detention of a US citizen on American soil without trial.

From Chris Bliss, Executive director, MyBillofRights.org, via Huffington, about the “remarkable story” of the Bill of Rights:

All the more remarkable when you consider that … the provisions of the Bill of Rights only applied to roughly 5% of the human beings living within the United States when it was ratified in 1791. They didn’t apply to slaves. They didn’t apply to Native Americans. They didn’t apply in large part to women, and only in full to white males of a certain amount of property and position.

And yet there is no exclusionary language within the Bill of Rights itself. So as our concept of individual liberty evolved through the experience of it … we had the blueprint already in hand to build on … .

The sad fact is that at this key crossroads in the life our nation, the Bill of Rights is … nowhere to be found in our public square. …

Meanwhile, our politics is mired in a Never Never Land where the word ‘compromise’ is only uttered as an expletive by those bent on enforcing their will (and extending their incumbency) at the expense of meaningful dialogue and any serious attempt to craft comprehensive and inclusive solutions.

Attempts to occupy Never Never Land, and provide some Bill of Rights sanity continue, in multiple ways. Today’s Occupy schedule, via OWS, includes:

Transport Workers Union (TWU) Local 100 was the first labor union to come out in support of Occupy Wall Street. Now, Occupy Wall Street Labor Outreach Committee is mobilizing #OWS to stand in solidarity with TWU as they begin their campaign to demand a fair contract.

Coming up on Saturday, from OWS:

Re-Occupy #D17

On Saturday, December 17th Occupy Wall Street — with support from more than 1400 faith leaders, elders of the civil rights movement, prominent artists and community members — will gather at noon in Duarte Square, downtown Manhattan, for an all day performance event. This event is part of a call to re-occupy in the wake of the coordinated attacks and subsequent evictions of occupations across the nation and around the world.

In a related article at OWS:

Occupy 2.0 #D17 …

Freedom of expression and the right to assemble are sacred human freedoms. …

On Saturday, December 17th – the 3 month anniversary of the birth of this movement, we will gather to celebrate Occupy Wall Street and to occupy space together.

Finally, some examples of freedom of expression, via the OWS Twitter feed:

This is why we support #OWS: Census shows 1 in 2 people are poor or low-income apne.ws/uMBPZO #AFLCIO

oneillpaintings RT @TheNewDeal: #Retweet to Tell @BarackObama If He Signs #NDAA and/or #SOPA, He Loses Your Vote in 2012. #BillofRightsDay #OWS #p2 #Obama2012

#OccupyAustin joins #Austin Taxi Cab Driver Protest at City Hall! Bring signs, voices, friends. #Solidarity and support

nathanc RT @OccupyPics: The Chinese village that fought back, Wukan, is now Occupied telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews.

(Re-Occupy Sign via OWS)

Read full story · Comments { 6 }

“Liberating the Left,” by Occupation

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

From the initiators of the Occupy Movement, on December 1, Darren Fleet writes at Adbusters “Fear of Flying: Liberating the Left … .” It includes this:

Lefty arguments are fraught with asterisks, exceptions, caveats, considerations, footnotes, excuses and pie-in-the-sky moral posturing coded in a lexicon that most people don’t even get.

The right meanwhile is able to stand behind simplistic, strong and wrong optimism, cloaking itself with the grace of God and good intentions. The left is caught navel-gazing and obsessing over whether or not their actions are philosophically correct; stuttering, qualifiyng, apologizing, accommodating, whimpering along the way. The right meanwhile is going with its gut, shooting from the hip … pick your conservative maxim. The reins of global power are in the hands of those who are able to symbolize a big idea, whatever that idea may be. The fortunes of the global left depend on whether or not they can take a stand on a big idea again.

This isn’t a new analysis, but it’s still timely. I read the following as related to questions about what “the left” will do, not just as related to the Occupy movement, but that’s where the action is centered at this moment. From Brittnay Shoot, at AlterNet:

Occupy the Stage: Hip-Hop Artists Fight Continuing Segregation with National Tour

Rapper Toussaint Morrison has long been involved in intervention-based educational theater and socially conscious hip-hop. …

Toussaint got in touch with two of his friends, Los Angeles–based rapper, organizer, and Ph.D. Jus Rhyme … and Minneapolis-based pop-funk songstress Mayda. The trio … began asking one another what it would mean to tour the top ten most segregated cities in the country, addressing issues of gender, race, and class discrimination through art.

The result is the Segregated City Tour. Shoot continues:

Despite the disconnected beginnings of each, the Segregated City Tour and the Occupy movements have a symbiotic relationship. Both raise more questions than can be answered, but Jus Rhyme thinks that’s appropriate.

‘It isn’t Occupy’s job to answer all the questions being raised. … It’s up to society and institutions of power to answer why this is happening.’ Pushing back against the dominant narrative that the Occupy movement is incoherent and disconnected, he shares his enthusiasm for the way the new movement is growing, explaining that it’s often hard to recognize what can truly cause change as it is unfolding. In the same way, he hopes the Segregated City Tour will raise more questions than it answers while creating an accessible platform for others to share their experiences and talk about change in their own communities.</blockquote>

Of course, there are other perspectives, including from those who think Occupy should, in fact, provide answers as well as questions. From Laura Flanders, at The Nation, in “What a Difference an Occupation Makes”:

As Boots Riley, of Occupy Oakland (and the Coup) told me a few weeks back. ‘What we’re thinking about now is how OWS can become a tool in the hands of communities.’ Which is to say, where can 500, 1,000, 2,000 people, make a difference? At an eviction, a housing auction, a school board hearing, in a congressman’s office—OWS have shown they can make an impact in all those places. …

‘The way to get community support,’ says (Malik) Rhasaan (of Occupy the Hood) ‘is to work in the community. Offer change people can measure.’ Note, he didn’t say ‘believe in.’ Been there, done that. What’s being asked of OWS now is not what the movement can demand but what they can deliver, for people who feel their lives, not just their hopes, hang in the balance.

My take, as always, is that it requires everyone who is willing to step up and do the needed work. I think it highly unlikely that alone, the Occupy Movement can name the problems and create the solutions. It seems obvious that “the left,” in its various forms, hasn’t been able to do that, either. So, you work together. Of course, being willing to do that, and being willing to go through the constant necessity of learning and evolving, is a challenge in itself.

One key component is a willingness to acknowledge the complexities, to accept the reality that there aren’t always, even usually, easy “fixes.” Among other things, that requires listening to each other, and generally speaking, that’s hard work in itself, even if everyone involved identifies as on “the left.”

I know it’s another example of my stating the obvious, but the problems Occupy, and others, are highlighting are complex. And the demands of media, pundits, Electeds and whoever else that Occupy provide neat and tidy answers, preferably ones which fit into the “analysis” and sound bites with which they are comfortable, just add to the complications. I think in part, at least, that’s what this “Open Letter from America’s Port Truck Drivers on Occupy the Ports,” related to the December 12 Port Shutdown,” points out. From OWS Press:

We are the front-line workers who haul container rigs full of imported and exported goods to and from the docks and warehouses every day. …

While we cannot officially speak for every worker who shares our occupation, we can use this opportunity to reveal what it’s like to walk a day in our shoes for the 110,000 of us in America whose job it is to be a port truck driver. It may be tempting for media to ask questions about whether we support a shutdown, but there are no easy answers. Instead, we ask you, are you willing to listen and learn why a one-word response is impossible?

Repeating, from the “Liberating the Left” article with which I began: “The fortunes of the global left depend on whether or not they can take a stand on a big idea again.” Of course, you first have to recognize the need for “liberation,” and then want to be “liberated,” before you can create and carry out ways to make that happen, before you can “take a stand on a big idea.” I think that’s what the Occupy movement is playing a very big role in doing: recognizing and “taking a stand.” And providing one possible way for “the left” to liberate itself.

It’s the classic “the emperor has no clothes” kind of thing: Look at Wall Street. Look at the Two Corporate Parties. They. Have. No. Clothes. Why the hell keep pretending they’re dressed in respectable suits, or that they’re paying anything but election year attention to people who are having very real problems providing clothing and other essentials for themselves?

(I Lost My Job poster via Occupy Posters )

Read full story · Comments { 2 }

The Politics of Occupy and Grassroots Guidance

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

A recent tweet, at Occupy USA: “Boots Riley tweets: ‘Mainstream media has moved from saying #OWS has no power, 2 sayin that we have power but r misguided.’”

“Nothing like some success to bring out the people who tell you what you’re doing wrong.” That was said to me years ago, following the most successful fundraising event a particular LGBT organization had ever had. I’ve been thinking about that, related to Occupy.

Unable to pretend that Occupy isn’t having successes, media, pundits, Electeds and others have turned to telling the Occupiers that they don’t know how to build on those successes. One significant part of the advice, or lecture, is about how Occupy is / should be related to politics, mostly with regard to the Democratic Party.

There are headlines like, “What Occupy Must / Should / Is Failing To Do.” Some, from both supportive and non-supportive perspectives, I find thoughtful. But the question of what to do related to the political status quo was being addressed, by Occupiers, from the beginning. I don’t think it surprises anyone that there are differing Occupier opinions and ideas, though to this point, that Occupy is not a political party, nor does it support any political party, seems to remain dominant.

Of course, it’s not an either / or situation – occupy or work within the existing electoral system. Those engaged in either or both can talk, share ideas, goals, even actions. And given the “horizontal” methods of decision making, each Occupy group will make its own choices.

From my perspective, though, it’s not Occupy’s job to do the work of reforming the Democratic party. There can be overlap, but the “outside” voice is what’s creating the conversation and the “pushing” of the Electeds. Of course Democratic related organizations would have stepped up their game in 2012, whether or not Occupy had ever happened. But Occupy has pushed those organizations, has pushed the Dem party, and has pushed the efforts toward “third parties” in ways that couldn’t have come from inside.

“Occupy will never die; Evict us, we multiply!” is the headline at a Dec. 10 posting at OWS. If you read nothing else, read this:

To the 1%’s pundits who claim Occupy is over: We are still here. Even as the agents of the 1% evict our communities and eviscerate our rights, we are evolving. …

Occupations across the country have found creative ways to persist, resist, and rebuild. … Last we checked, tents still stand in DC, Chicago, Boise, Oklahoma City, Buffalo, Miami, Chapel Hill, Cleveland, Providence, Baltimore, Orlando, Nashville, Pittsburgh, Pensacola, Lexington, Newark, Gainesville, Peoria, Eugene, Rochester, Orlando, Tacoma, Reno, Charlotte, Raleigh, New Haven, Houston, Austin, Tampa, Louisville, and elsewhere. In Anchorage, they even have igloos. …

Occupiers in cities like Atlanta, Oakland, Fort Worth, Jackson, and Phoenix have cleverly responded to evictions by staying in the parks during the day and moving to the sidewalk at night. In Los Angeles, Toronto, San Diego, Portland, Tulsa, San Jose, Dayton, Tucson, Cincinnati, Kansas City, Sacramento, Hartford, Charlottesville, Denver, Dallas, Norfolk, Richmond, Philadelphia, New Orleans, and New York, evicted Occupations continue to hold General Assemblies and maintain busy calendars with daily meetings, events, workshops, teach-ins, marches, direct actions, and demonstrations at their local city hall, bank branch, corporate office, and courts.

We are also disrupting business-as-usual from Wall Street to K Street. … We mic check corrupt politicians and 1%ers everywhere they go. We have moved homeless families into empty foreclosed homes. We have spread our message by occupying the highway. …

While maintaining our nonpartisan focus on economic inequality and connecting a diversity of issues that impact the 99%, Occupations have begun to refine and hone our messaging around the big banks, foreclosures, evictions, and housing. …

We have marched on U.S.-companies that supply teargas to the Egyptian government … ; with immigrants rights activists against deportation, detention and wage-theft in Birmingham and New York; with seniors to advocate for social services; with students against tuition-hikes, with workers and unions for jobs, better working conditions, and fair wages; and with farmers fighting for food justice. … We’ve marched to draw attention to the connections between the corrupt banking system and issues like the prison industrial complex and climate change.

This is merely a sketch of the ongoing work of the Occupy Wall Street movement. … And we’re just getting started.

What are the politics of the Occupy movement? And how do you change an entrenched and stacked against you political system?

If OWS disappeared (which I don’t think likely, though it will surely continue evolving), what then? Would we just go back to pre-Occupation days, and the familiar “lesser of two evils,” “after this election we can start to change things,” “voting in third parties is only voting for (whichever candidate you oppose), or a ‘wasted’ vote,” and all the other familiar Two Party rhetoric? Occupy isn’t the only way to challenge “the system,” but they’ve done more to change the broad conversation in the last few months than anyone else has in the last several years, if not decades.

If the movement shifts to a largely or strictly Insider game, then I think a major opportunity will have been lost. I actually don’t think that’s what will happen, that Occupy will – as the Democratic Party so obviously wants them to do – become assimilated into the Dem Party. Just as obviously, I could be wrong about that. But advocacy requires some degree of autonomy. If the people you’re seeking to influence know they’ll get your ultimate support, no matter what, there’s little to zero incentive to listen to you, much less respond to you.

The tweet with which I began: “Mainstream media has moved from saying #OWS has no power, 2 sayin that we have power but r misguided.” What “misguided” means, of course, is that the MSM, among others, thinks they should provide the correct “guidance.” But like the movement itself, the politics of the Occupy movement are evolving, and doing so at a grassroots level, with a grassroots guidance.

( Poster via Occupy Posters )

Read full story · Comments { 7 }

12-12 Port Shutdown and the “vampire squid”

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

“Shutdown the Port” actions began early this morning, and continue. You can check out what’s happening via OWS, where you will find a livestream link. The purpose of the Port Shutdown, from Occupy SF:

We Are Protesting…
• In solidarity with the ILWU Local 21 workers in Longview, WA and their struggle against EGT (Export Grain Terminal)
• In solidarity with port truck drivers and their struggle to be reclassified as employees, rather than independent operators, and in their fight to be organized in a union.
• In response to the coordinated national attacks against the Occupy camps. This is our coordinated response to police violence and repression.
• Against the priorities of the 1% and ‘Wall Street on the Waterfront.’

From some participating locations, the first revealing another innovation in the Occupy movement, via Occupy Oakland:

In the early hours of December 11th an autonomous group of individuals launched a handmade raft in Lake Merritt, the SS Don’t Let the Banks Punk You Out. Their aim is to bring attention to the occupy movement, which has been evicted from Frank Ogawa/Oscar Grant Plaza and has faced repression across the country and all over the world. …

The occupants of the SS Don’t Let the Banks Punk You Out also hope to bring attention to the … coordinated west coast port shutdown … . The shutdown is in solidarity with the longshoremen against the multinational corporation EGT and the truckers against one of the main culprits of the financial crisis, Goldman Sachs. Cities participating in the port shutdown include: Oakland, Los Angeles, San Diego, Tacoma, Olympia, Seattle and Vancouver. There will be solidarity actions in cities without ports, such as Denver and Houston.

Go to those Occupy sites for local information.

On the related Vampire Squid story, from OWS:

NYC will Target the Vampire Squid- Goldman Sachs

In solidarity with the West Coast Port Shutdown on December 12th , the NYC Occupy Movement vows to disrupt business as usual for the that exploit our nation’s ports – and profit from the exploitation of tens of thousands of working people laboring behind the scenes …of the international trade system. …

Occupies from coast to coast have joined with longshoremen and truckers in the fight against the exploitation of workers. On December 12th, the 99% will take action in support of these workers and their successful mobilizations, unifying around key strategic targets engaged in indulgent control of our economy and government.

In a related action, from Occupy Denver:

In response to rumors, lies, and hearsay that have circulated regarding the 12/12 Walmart Action, we, as the General Assembly of Occupy Denver and the planners of the action in Loveland, hereby reaffirm that the 12/12 Action is and has always been a non-violent action, and that we do not and have never condoned or sanctioned violence of any kind or the destruction of property. Any allegations to the contrary are patently false.

A few 12-12 day of action related tweets, plus a couple of others:

andybp85 RT @OccupyWallStNYC: Why #GoldmanSachs? They r owner of the shipping company that is target of #D12 #PortShutDown.

WhirlwindWisdom RT @kstrel: The vampire squid is trying to enter Goldman Sachs building. Crowd chanting ‘he’s gotta go to work!’

savetheusa RT @nydailynews: #OWS using squid symbol b/c @mtaibbi called Goldman Sachs ‘a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity’ bit.ly/fP1n2A

Sancti_purist RT @mofogrande: First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, & then they build a tv version of your camp.#ows #mockupy

More on the “Mockupy” story at Huffington.

At Occupy Patriarchy, you can read about a number of “empowering actions and statements” around the U.S. Included in the piece is this:

The recent demonizing and vilifying of the Occupy movement in the media is a scape-goating of the problems and violence that plague our communities and cities daily. Rape happens every day, murder happens every day and Suicide happens every day. These tragedies are not symptoms or creations of the Occupy Movement, nor are they exclusive to the Occupy Movement; they are realities of our society and of our everyday lives.

Finally, a couple of things from Occupy Boston. First, read “We might have been evicted, but we shall not be moved”.

And from a recent Fact of the Day:

While 100 million Americans are at or near the poverty level and Congress debates whether it can afford an extension of unemployment benefits and other crucial lifelines for working Americans, a new report estimates that U.S. corporations are sitting on $3.6 trillion in cash reserves.

The corporations are “sitting on” those reserves in ways that are legal, or at least that’s what I’m reading. Just like for years, decades, the right to vote was denied, “legally,” based on whether or not you owned land, or on race or gender, or right now in some states, on whether you have the latest state approved identification (meant to make voting more difficult). Just as lesbian and gay couples are “legally” denied the right to marry by our federal, and most, state governments. Just as the right to strike has been consistently and “legally” curtailed. The Occupy movement is addressing a “legal” system — or systems, political, financial and more — at fundamental levels of human rights. Not perfectly, not without mistakes, but also with some significant success.

I’ve not said this in a while, but please remember that in these posts, I’m only hitting on a few actions and stories and comments. A great deal more is happening.

In response to a few inquiries, a housekeeping note: Computer challenges are making it difficult for me to get to Comments. And there are some “life” challenges as well, reducing time available. I do read all comments, and appreciate everyone’s participation. Please keep talking. I hope to be able to join you again soon.

( Vampire Squid graphic via Digg
Port Shutdown Raft photo via Occupy Oakland )

Read full story · Comments { 1 }

Eleanor Roosevelt, Unions and Occupy

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

Before turning to Eleanor and unions, one quick thing: Time magazine has released its “Top 10 U.S.-News Stories,” and with no surprise at all, “Occupy Wall Street Protests” is number one on the list. You can see the accompanying spread here.

Now, about Eleanor Roosevelt. Suzanne Kahn asks the question: Would Eleanor Roosevelt Support Occupy Wall Street?. Obviously the answer is speculative, but I still found it an interesting read.

In 1962, she (Roosevelt) answered a question about another set of mass protests – the anti-nuclear rallies of 1961 and 1962. Asked if she saw any value in women’s groups marching in front of the White House for peace, she wrote:

‘The average person has a sense of frustration because he can think of no way to express to his government or to the world at large his desires for peaceful solutions to the difficulties that confront us. The demonstrations you mention are important if only because they dramatize the lack of more useful ways for people to show their devotion to the cause of peace.’ (McCall’s, May 1962).

Similarly, in 1961 Eleanor also wrote about the frustration individuals felt about not being able to do more to prevent nuclear war. In ‘My Day’ (her syndicated newspaper column) she wrote that the best an individual could do was ‘register with our government a firm protest.

The response regarding demonstrations, that they “dramatize(d) the lack of more useful ways” of expressing concerns for peace, isn’t the most vigorous endorsement, I suppose, but then, she was speaking to the “frustration” of getting the government to listen to your concerns. It would be very nice if such actions weren’t necessary, but when your government ignores your concerns, and at this point, has the electoral system so stacked against voters getting real choices, taking to the streets may very well be one of the most “useful ways” to get the message out.

Kahn’s analysis includes this:

OWS provides the average person with a way to express frustration and register a firm protest about an unfair economy. Critics have demanded that OWS propose solutions, but Eleanor might have pointed out that OWS makes clear the important point that there aren’t easy, direct ways for the average person to fix the economy.

Viewed this way, OWS is doing something both Eleanor Roosevelt and the feminists of the 1960s and 1970s really understood: consciousness raising. Consciousness raising was a method of political mobilization developed by feminists in the late 1960s and 1970s. Formally begun by women’s liberation groups, consciousness raising groups allowed women to share personal experiences and frustrations and come to understand that these were not isolated instances, but part of a larger pattern of political relationships that defined women’s personal lives. Many feminists embraced consciousness raising methods because they hoped the realizations they inspired would move women to more concrete political action.

I know, “consciousness raising” was derided endlessly, became the butt of multiple jokes, along with the “bra burners” and other stereotypically and largely uninformed sexist responses that avoided addressing actual issues. Kind of the way Occupy is treated, by some.

Okay, now to unions, via NY Times, where Steven Greenhouse writes, “Occupy Movement Inspires Unions to Embrace Bold Tactics”:

Organized labor’s early flirtation with Occupy Wall Street is starting to get serious.

Union leaders, who were initially cautious in embracing the Occupy movement, have in recent weeks showered the protesters with help – tents, air mattresses, propane heaters and tons of food. The protesters, for their part, have joined in union marches and picket lines across the nation. About 100 protesters from Occupy Wall Street are expected to join a Teamsters picket line at the Sotheby’s auction house in Manhattan on Wednesday night to back the union in a bitter contract fight.

Greenhouse notes that labor has watched Occupy’s use of Twitter, Tumblr and other social media, and is making changes accordingly.

‘The Occupy movement has changed unions,’ said Stuart Appelbaum, the president of the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union. ‘You’re seeing a lot more unions wanting to be aggressive in their messaging and their activity. You’ll see more unions on the street, wanting to tap into the energy of Occupy Wall Street.’

Unions have long stuck to traditional tactics like picketing. But inspired by the Occupy protests, labor leaders are talking increasingly of mobilizing the rank and file and trying to flex their muscles through large, boisterous marches, including nationwide marches planned for Nov. 17. …

‘We think the Occupy movement has given voice to something very basic about what’s going on in our country right now,’ said Damon Silvers, the A.F.L.-C.I.O.’s policy director. …

Of course there isn’t total agreement on what the relationship between Occupy and labor unions should be. Some Occupiers talk about the need to work closely together, others express concerns about maintaining autonomy, about being co-opted. From the union side of things,

María Elena Durazo, executive secretary-treasurer of the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor, said it remained to be seen whether the unions and the protesters could, by working together, achieve concrete change.

‘Workers are with the Occupy movement on the broader issues; they’re with them on the issue of inequality.’ … ‘The question is, can the labor movement or the Occupy movement move that message down to the workplace, where workers confront low wages, low benefits and little power?’

Eleanor, unions and Occupy. Now it’s your turn.

( Poster via Occupy Posters )

Read full story · Comments { 3 }

An Occupied thought: “The People Who Created the Crisis Will Not Be the Ones That Come Up With a Solution”

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

Looking at the history of activism, this is what we should expect will continue happening related to the Occupy movement: break-away groups, offshoots, and yes, co-opting, or simply using the momentum and attention gained by Occupiers. From Roll Call:

Liberal Groups Take Up Occupy Mantle in D.C.

The rain-soaked protesters who stormed Capitol Hill on Tuesday in an attempt to “Occupy Congress” are not officially part of the Occupy Wall Street movement, but they are an example of how established liberal groups are trying to capitalize on the grass-roots movement and shift it from protests to direct advocacy.

Tuesday’s labor-backed sit-in, which targeted mostly Republican lawmakers, was actually focused on a legislative agenda that predates the Occupy movement. Hundreds of activists lobbied Members of Congress to pass President Barack Obama’s proposed jobs plan and extend unemployment insurance. …

… even as the Capitol Hill protesters shouted that they are the ‘99 percent,’ language introduced by OWS, it was unclear whether the D.C. effort had the backing of the larger grass-roots movement. …

The Capitol Hill action — led by the American Dream Movement, a coalition that includes MoveOn.org, the Service Employees International Union and the local jobs group Our DC — aimed to direct the movement toward legislative advocacy. …

Some Occupy activists joined in, but others disagreed that lobbying Congress is the best way forward.

Disagreements, and just differing perspectives and ideas, are inevitable. If the response is to call anyone holding a perspective differing from our own an idiot … then we’ll all be working with “idiots,” ourselves included, because differences are always going to be a part of the process. It’s entirely possible, and actually quite common, for breakaway groups, or groups with similar or overlapping agendas, to co-exist, even cooperate. The Roll Call piece continues in describing some of what’s happening now.

Jonathan Smucker, a leader of the Occupy Our Homes effort, said he is not interested in appealing to Congress through traditional advocacy routes.

‘I think it’s clear that we can’t compete with the money of Wall Street and the money of the big banks to influence politicians. We don’t want to … . We’re in a process of creating a new revitalized civic in this country.’

Ben Campbell, who is leading an Occupy Wall Street offshoot called Occupy Fundraisers, disagrees and said he would prefer to work within the current political system.

‘There’s a little bit of a divide between the radicals and reformers. Ultimately, we’re all working toward the same goal,’ Campbell said.

On Monday, Campbell protested a fundraiser for GOP presidential candidate and former Speaker Newt Gingrich (Ga.) to draw attention to the role money plays in politics.

University of California (Irvine) sociology professor David Meyer is quoted in the same article:

‘You can expect if the movement takes off that there are going to be a lot of failed campaigns, but some things are going to take off’ … . He added that it is typical for grass-roots movements to splinter into different efforts, and it doesn’t necessarily mean their demise.

‘The fact that people are going to disagree and do different things doesn’t mean it can’t be a movement’ he said.

That’s rather extensive quoting on my part, but the article provides a good way to consider the current moment of Occupation, and beyond. You can read other thoughts and perspectives about the movement in the first edition of Tidal: Occupy Theory, Occupy Strategy.

Another source for Occupy information, among other things, is at Digitafolio.

From a November 29 Wired.com piece, Tracking the U.S. Government’s Response to #Occupy on Twitter:

… the New York Times reported … the #occupywallstreet hashtag was conceived in July, a full two months before the first tent was pitched at Zuccotti Park.

As it grew from a single camp into a movement, Twitter was essential for getting real-time updates out as events unfolded, for both supporters and local government. …

While city officials have actively communicated their positions, the response from the federal government has been muted, at best. … So far, official statements are isolated and infrequent — an early endorsement from the president, a couple of statements from the White House press secretary, and a range of opinions from individual members of Congress. …

Since the Occupy protests started in mid-September, nearly 15,000 messages were posted by the 126 federal Twitter accounts. Of those accounts, only three have mentioned the Occupy protests in any way — Voice of America, the Smithsonian, and the White House.

Here’s another perspective on what’s happening, via Huffington :

The United Nations envoy for freedom of expression is drafting an official communication to the U.S. government demanding to know why federal officials are not protecting the rights of Occupy demonstrators whose protests are being disbanded — sometimes violently – by local authorities.

One official response to Occupy that received a lot of attention was in Oakland, whose mayor caught a lot of flak. Via SF Gate:

A petition to recall Oakland Mayor Jean Quan was certified Wednesday for signature gathering just as a second group of residents submitted their own recall petition against the increasingly embattled mayor.

This is also from late last month, but Roy makes what seems to me to be a fundamental point, and a good way to close. From TruthOut, an interview with Arundhati Roy, who says, “The People Who Created the Crisis Will Not Be the Ones That Come Up With a Solution.”

( Poster via Occupy Posters )

Read full story · Comments { 1 }

Occupy, “after the encampments”

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

UPDATE Today Occupy DC followed through with the plans I mentioned yesterday: this morning’s march to an “undisclosed” lobbying firm reportedly found the doors locked – how symbolic is that – but showing up still made a statement. A party on K Street included drums and dancing, and apparently at least one Occupier being arrested when he laid down in the street. A march to the WH at 5PM, and a 7PM march to the Supreme Court filled out the day’s actions. Live stream (feed is kind of iffy) here.

One admiring comment I heard while watching the livestream: “Nobody does Occupy like Grandma does Occupy.” Probably talking about an old hippy, of course.

A couple of current actions, and some thoughts about “after the encampment.” I’m going to start with the latter, from the initiators of the Occupy movement, Adbusters. They have a very important post up, following at least a couple of others, all of which are looking at the “what’s next in the Occupy movement” direction. Adbusters doesn’t “run” or “lead” the movement they helped initiate, but their thinking could certainly be important in creating the “what’s next” steps and actions.

After the Encampments, #OCCUPYMIGRATION and #OCCUPYHOMES, via Adbusters, Micah White writes:

The history of activism is a cat-and-mouse game of surprising tactical innovations that spark an insurrectionary situation and the counterstrategies developed to put down the revolt. … In each of these cases, the power structures were taken by surprise, were slow to respond but eventually, through trial-and-error, discovered a successful counterstrategy. If there is one law of activism it is that every tactic which works initially will eventually be defeated if too often repeated. …

From the perspective of the status quo putting down a revolution is a matter of buttressing oneself against unforeseen assaults and waiting out the initial storm while continually experimenting with responses. … Our task as revolutionary activists is thus quite difficult: we must continually innovate; we must perceive immediately when one tactic begins to fail; we must be ready to deploy another stratagem.

#OCCUPY was birthed when the Tahrir Uprising was combined with the Spanish acampadas and transposed onto an unexpected place: the most potent symbol of casino capitalism: Wall Street. From a strictly tactical perspective, the first phase of #OCCUPY was comprised of a permanent encampment and a general assembly. … It was the quantity and autonomy of these encampments – that they grew despite an early media blackout, that locals showered them with financial and material support, that they functioned as a viable alternative to the corporate-State – which presented the greatest threat to the status quo.

After some trial and error, the “corporate-State” figured out what to do, and the tactic spread, successfully. Basically, they announce a deadline for the close of the camp; the Occupiers gather in large numbers, law enforcement shows up in large numbers, but then don’t enforce the eviction. Then. They way a day, week or however long, return to “carry out a military-style raid when the encampment is sparsely populated,” and shut it down.

White continues:

… we could very easily get stuck in a game of diminishing returns by expending our resources to set up encampments once they’ve been taken down knowing they will be taken down once again.

White doesn’t suggest that remaining encampments, or presumably the new versions that have appeared (basically, follow the rules but maintain a presence), should be abandoned, but writes, “now might be the perfect moment to embrace the innovation that is already happening.”

We can accelerate the #OCCUPYHOMES meme by making a concerted push on December 6 and beyond to set up squats in bank-owned, foreclosed homes. In addition, we can facilitate the #OCCUPYMIGRATION of occupiers from hostile to friendly cities. There are, for example, over ninety tents at #OCCUPYBERKELEY even though #OCCUPYOAKLAND’s encampment a few miles away has been shut down.

While the corporate-State chases symbolic tents, we can start consolidating and fortifying our outdoor encampments in friendly territory until we are strong enough to resist foreclosure. Meanwhile in cities everywhere, let’s quietly set up local indoor Occupy Homes in every neighborhood. Both of these spaces just might become the bases for our Spring Offensive.

That appears to be what’s happening. From OWS, about the national day of action to “Occupy Our Homes”:

In recent days and weeks, there has been successful occupation move-ins of homeless families and eviction defense for homeowners facing foreclosure in Atlanta, Cleveland, Minneapolis, Rochester, and over a dozen other cities and towns across the country. Local communities and 99% movement participants have committed to escalating this occupation movement to support the human right to housing — and to push back against the bailed-out and fraudulent big banks that are stealing our homes.

Another action, “Take Back The Capitol,” is taking place in DC this week. Via The Indy Channel:

‘Take Back the Capitol’ is, in part, an outgrowth of the movement to protect collective bargaining that started in Wisconsin and Ohio.

The ‘Rebuild the Dream’ movement organized the event, with funding from many sources, including MoveOn.org and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU).

The movement says thousands of people signed up to join the protest, being organized ‘by a wide variety of community, labor, Occupy, and other groups around the country.’

The official website links to SEIU.org … .

I’ve seen this described as “using the Occupy movement for their own purposes,” but also as “just another way of making the same kind of points OWS is making.” It doesn’t show up on the Occupy DC website, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t Occupiers involved, from DC and elsewhere. The same article says that Tuesday’s actions included visits, and sit-ins, to the offices of, among others: Rep. Vicky Hartzler, R-Missouri; Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Maryland (who met with the group); “Sens. Joe Lieberman, Scott Brown, Marco Rubio and other lawmakers.”

This part, from the same article, is interesting, in terms of who is involved in the “Take Back the Capitol” weeklong event:

The company Berlin Rosen, which specializes in public affairs campaign management, said sit-ins were taking place at the offices of more than a dozen lawmakers, including Sens. Dean Heller, Kay Bailey Hutchison and Mark Kirk.

‘Unemployed workers and activists from around the country are refusing to leave congressional offices until they are able to speak firsthand to their members of Congress about the need for action on jobs and extending unemployment insurance benefits,’ the company said in a news release.

(Occupy Home poster via Adbusters)

Read full story · Comments { 21 }

Playing the “yes, but” game with Occupy

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

You’ve had the experience. Two or more people, talking about how to solve some problem, or how to plan something, even as simple as where to eat. And there’s that person who greets every idea with some version of “Yes, but …,” and proceeds to say why a particular idea or suggestion won’t work. That’s how some people are approaching OWS.

The Occupiers are really making a statement, through their camps, about the gulf between the 1% and the 99%!

Yes, but they’ll have to do more than that to be successful. And nobody knows what they really want.

The Occupiers are making it clear what their concerns are — in statements, chants, signs, street theatre, teach-ins, their own newspapers and libraries, general strikes, marches, occupying a Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee fundraiser, gathering in front of Bloomberg’s mansion, occupying foreclosed properties, all kinds of ways!

Yes, but they need to get in the face of bankers.

The Occupiers are rallying in front of banks!

Yes, but that’s just going to make people who need to do some banking get mad. They really need to get in the face of politicians.

The Occupiers ‘mic checked’ Obama!

Yes, but they need to understand that it’s the Republicans they should be targeting.

The Occupiers confronted Gingrich!

Yes, but the Republicans aren’t going to listen to Occupy.

You really have a lot of criticisms. Got any ideas?

Yes, but you’re clearly too politically naive to understand them.

Meanwhile, the politically naive, dirty f’kin hippies, etc., keep on coming up with ideas and actions.

Via Occupy DC:

On Wednesday, Dec 7, Occupy DC calls on all occupiers in the DC Metro area to unite for a day of action against the undue influence of money in politics.

We will meet at McPherson Square at 10:30am to march on an undisclosed lobbying firm.

At noon we will reconvene at McPherson Square for an occupation block party on K Street. …

At 5pm we will march to the White House, a central hub of corporate bribery. President Obama is expected to raise as much as $1 billion in his re-election campaign — enough to pay 20,000 school teachers for a year.

Then we will march to the Supreme Court to protest its decision in the Citizens United case. This decision promises to unleash a flood of corporate campaign contributions unlike anything seen before, until the American citizens unite to overturn it.

From Occupy Oakland:

Support Grows For Occupy Movement’s Coordinated West Coast Shut Down On December 12th

‘We’re shutting down these ports because of the union busting and attacks on the working class by the 1%: the firing of Port truckers organizing at SSA terminals in LA; the attempt to rupture ILWU union jurisdiction in Longview, WA by EGT. EGT includes Bunge LTD, a company which reported 2.5 billion dollars in profit last year and has economically devastated poor people in Argentina and Brazil. SSA is responsible for inhumane working conditions and gross exploitation of port truckers and is owned by Goldman Sachs. EGT and Goldman Sachs is Wallstreet on the Waterfront’ stated Barucha Peller of the West Coast Port Blockade Assembly of Occupy Oakland.

‘We are also striking back against the nationally coordinated attack on the Occupy movement. In response to the police violence and camp evictions against the Occupy movement … . ’

Each Occupy is organizing plans for a mass mobilization and community pickets to shut down their local Port. The mobilization of over 60,000 people that shut down the Port of Oakland during the general strike on November 2, 2011 is the model for the West Coast efforts. …

From West Coast Shutdown, a list of participating Occupations includes Anchorage, Berkeley, Denver, Houston, Portland, Oakland, Salt Lake City, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle, Tacoma, Santa Barbara, Vancouver, and Occupy Wall Street.

In other actions, via Occupy Cleveland:

Because the Occupy movement is addressing the pressing concerns of all people, Cleveland City Council has passed this resolution to state that it supports the principles of our movement and the peaceful and lawful exercise of the First Amendment! The Council is transmitting copies of this resolution to President Barack Obama and all members of the U.S. Congress. The resolution passed 18 to 1!

From Occupy Atlanta:

Some Occupiers decided to try a tactic which has worked in other cities, of retreating to the sidewalks at night when the park is closed. Every morning at 6 am, the tents are moved back into the park. So far, so good… . After tomorrow there will be THREE Occupations in Atlanta: the park and two houses under threat of foreclosure in the Old 4th Ward and Riverdale. Occupy Gwinnett is working on their own plan.

Occupy Houston has this:

In continuing solidarity with the oppressed LGBT community of the Russian Federation, Occupy Houston will be holding protests outside of the Russian Consulate … .

Two tweets for today:

… RT this if you want to #OccupyFox

CryptoAnarchy RT @tibettruth: ‘You have the right to consume & a right to remain silent’, anything else means you are a #terrorist

( West Coast Port Blockade poster via West Coast Port Blockade
Repeal Citizens United poster via Occupy Posters )

Read full story · Comments { 23 }

A corporate world’s marketing look at OWS

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

Here’s another reason to question the “Occupy movement isn’t having any effect” proclamations, from CommPro:

The D S Simon/CommPRO.biz ‘Occupy Wall Street’ Survey

Dear Corporate Communications Professional,

What affect is ‘Occupy Wall Street’ having on corporate image and corporate communications plans? It’s time for answers. The D S Simon/Commpro.biz ‘Occupy Wall Street’ Survey will deliver them straight to your inbox if you take two minutes to answer this brief survey … .

The results will be presented at the New York City Chapter of the International Association of Business Communicators (IABC) ‘Occupy Wall Street’ event featuring Douglas Simon, D S Simon Productions; Martin Murtland, Dow Jones, and Bob DeFillippo, Prudential Financial, on December 7, 2011 at Dow Jones here in New York City.

And here’s something about that “event,” via NYABC:

NYIABC ‘Show & Tell’ Event …

What the OWS Movement Means to Corporate Reputation, Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Communications

What You’ll Learn

Occupy Wall Street as a movement has tapped into a massive groundswell of anger and resentment against Corporate America. As companies like Wells Fargo have learned … , this movement can impact not only a company’s reputation, but also its very business operations, corporate decisions and how it communicates with all of its stakeholder groups, including the press, investors, employees, customers and even local communities.

So how should you and your company or client respond? What happens when you become a target? And how can you best prepare for this new economic reality by building, for example, a strong corporate social responsibility program that can help you stay out of the OWS crosshairs? Learn the answer to these questions and more—including how to adjust your communications strategies and messaging and even crisis planning accordingly—in this live NYC panel featuring corporate communications execs, crisis communications veterans, media and even corporate social responsibility experts from some of the nations most recognized brands and companies. …

Add this to the much repeated comments by Republican strategist Frank Luntz, to The Republican Governors Association – “I’m so scared of this anti-Wall Street effort. They’re having an impact on what the American people think of capitalism,”—and it’s difficult to argue, as I’ve seen done, that the Occupy movement “isn’t even a blip on the corporate radar.” Of course, what this “Show & Tell” – I’m still shaking my head at the use of that term – event also shows is that “job creators” (what Luntz said to us rather than “entrepreneur”) can always find a way to make money.

Now to some of what’s going on the lives of those directly affected by Wall Street , beginning with Occupy Our Homes:

Occupy Our Homes is a movement that supports Americans who stand up to their banks. We believe everyone has a right to decent, affordable housing. We stand in solidarity with the Occupy Wall Street movement and with community organizations who help the 99% fight for their homes.

Join us on December 6 for a national day of action to fight back against the housing crisis and be part of the continuing movement to Occupy Our Homes.

A list of “allies”: Take Back the Land The New Bottom Line, New York Communities for Change, Minnesota Neighborhoods Organizing for Change, Not An Alternative, Missourians Organizing for Reform and Empowerment, Housing Is A Human Right, The Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, Picture the Homeless, Organizing for Occupation, Ohio Fraudclosure Blog, 4closureFraud.org.

Read more at Occupy Together.

This Tuesday, thousands will be standing up for their neighbors in a struggle against a system that places financial gain above the human need of shelter. Banks would rather let houses deteriorate than renegotiate loans with those who make them homes and build our communities.

From OpEdNews:

The day (December 6) will mark the beginning of an Occupy Our Homes campaign that organizers hope will energize the movement as it moves indoors as well as bring the injustices of the economic crisis into sharp relief. … We’ve already seen eviction defenses at foreclosed properties around the country as well as takeovers of vacant properties for homeless families. Occupy Our Homes organizer Abby Clark tells me protesters are planning to ‘mic-check’ (i.e., disrupt) foreclosures.

‘This is a shift from protesting Wall Street fraud to taking action on behalf of people who were harmed by it. It brings the movement into the neighborhoods and gives people a sense of what’s really at stake,’ said Max Berger, one of the Occupy Our Homes organizers and a member of Occupy Wall Street’s movement-building working group.

Among Occupy locations participating are Minneapolis, St. Louis, Oakland, Erie, Milwaukee, Los Angeles, Atlanta, Seattle, Boston, Cleveland, Portland, New York, Chapel Hill, DC, London, Santa Cruz, and Philadelphia.

Another recent action, via OWS:

Farmers Join Occupy Wall Street, Calling for Food Justice

As Wall Street’s corrupt influence on the economy has grown, the corporate ownership of our food system has hurt the health and livelihood’s of some of our most vulnerable communities. This Sunday, December 4th food justice activists and occupiers will be traveling from as far as Colorado, Iowa, Maine and Upstate New York to join together for the Occupy Wall Street FARMERS’ MARCH.

Finally, and very directly related to politics, this from OWS:

OWS Tells Newt Gingrich to ‘Take a Bath’

Newt Gingrich told Occupy Wall Street protesters to ‘go get a job, right after you take a bath.’ Funny coming from a filthy rich politician who is rolling in dirty money. …

On Monday, Newt is in town to raise money from the 1%. OWS will be there to greet him … (and) to tell Newt to ‘take a bath’, and clean our politics of the corrupting influence of corporate money.

That could be kind of fun. And “fun,” or funny, is my only excuse for including one tweet from the OWS’ feed:

“Whenever I make the cat get off my chair, (Twitter follower) chants at me, ‘The whole world is watching!’ #OWS.”

( National Day Of Action banner via OWS
Occupy Food poster via OWS )

Read full story · Comments { 3 }

That sinking feeling while Occupying

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

I don’t usually repeat stories, but one from Yahoo News that I mentioned in yesterday’s post is getting more attention. I think that’s because it really is quite revealing. Chris Moody’s report on Frank Luntz’s advice to The Republican Governors Association, in response to “how can Republicans do a better job of talking about Occupy Wall Street?” includes: “I’m so scared of this anti-Wall Street effort. They’re having an impact on what the American people think of capitalism.”

Meanwhile, the movement goes on. In the realities of activism – which run the gamut from the mundane to the dramatic – here is some of what’s happening, beginning with what I suppose could be considered a mini drama. Via Think Progress:

Cops Invade Occupy Boston To Seize Its Sink

Occupy Boston now has everything but the kitchen sink. This evening, riot police invaded the Occupy Boston encampment to seize the protestors’ kitchen sink. The action, which led to the arrest of three protesters and a police officer accidentally stepping on a college-age female protester, was in evident violation of the restraining order that forbids the seizure of personal belongings extended today by Suffolk Superior Court Frances McIntyre.

Police seized the newly donated graywater sink and tossed it into the back of a police wagon, as other police with flex cuffs blocked occupiers. Dozens of motorcycle police arrived. A brief skirmish ensued as some protesters linked arms to block the wagon from leaving. In the ensuing sink seizure chaos, occupier Suzi Pietroluongo was stepped on by a police officer. When the police wagon sped off, the back doors were open and the sink was hanging out.

The story added an UPDATE: “According to Occupy Boston activist Robin Jacks, plans including the sink had been approved by the Boston Department of Public Health.”

I think I sort of feel sorry for the police officers who had to carry out a “seize the sink” operation. I’m imagining a dispatcher’s call: “We have a report of a suspicious sink. Plumbers are in route to assist in the seizure.”

In NYC, OWS continues to discuss and create new ways of Occupying.

Moving Forward Together: An Open Space for Discussion

Since losing our encampment, different spaces have been used for continued discussion and creative reflection together. This Saturday, a process called Open Space will be piloted to look at what we value, what we’ve accomplished, and where we are going. Please join us as an individual or with your work group. … Open Space is based in decentralized small conversations that are documented and shared with the whole group. It is more resilient to disruption and less centered on facilitators.

Also on Saturday, from OWS:

Occupy to Celebrate: The Resilience of OWS

On Saturday December 3rd, 2011, at 10:00 am, Occupy Wall Street and members of the New York faith community invite the Occupy Movement to join in a celebration of our occupation at Liberty Square. We are calling on all occupiers to reenergize our movement, keep Liberty Square active, and share ideas about the importance of outdoor spaces for our future. Bishop George Packard, Pulitzer prize-winning author and journalist Chris Hedges, and OccupyFaith will rally around Occupy Wall Street’s immediate need for spaces to continue organizing for social and economic justice.

The event will celebrate the launch of Tidal, a journal of occupation theory from the Occupy Movement.

From David Brown, via Occupy Washington DC:

Occupy UC Davis protesters adopt resolution calling for break with Democratic Party

On Tuesday evening, the general assembly of Occupy UC Davis passed a resolution denouncing the attack on Davis students, calling for a break with the Democratic Party and the construction of an independent social and political movement of the entire working class.

The resolution, the first of its kind adopted at an Occupy protest, lays out a clear political perspective to counter the growing attacks on protests against inequality in the United States. It comes a week and a half after the brutal pepper spraying of unarmed students protesting against rising tuition and inequality. …

The resolution reads in full:

We, the students of UC Davis, condemn the brutal police assault and pepper spraying of fellow students, who were peacefully protesting on November 18.

This attack is part of a nationwide—in fact global—crackdown on demonstrations against social inequality and the domination of politics by the rich. While the American government invokes ‘democratic rights’ to justify wars abroad, it responds to social protests at home with riot police, tear gas and rubber bullets. …

Some of the most brutal attacks on Occupy demonstrations have been carried out by Democratic Party mayors.

The way forward is clear: No support should be given to either of the two parties! The dictates of the banks and corporations can be countered only through the independent social and political struggle of the entire working class.

Finally, a Twitter selection:

pyrmontvillage RT @iain2008: The most effective way to restrict democracy: transfer decision-making to corporations. Chomsky

SA There Police arrest 29 Occupy Tampa protesters for failing to vacate Curtis Hixon Park. is.gd/1pTffy #OWS15

bjflanagan #OWS protesters regroup after tent cities are cleared: How about a series of flash mobs? Fun for everyone! wapo.st/vxMkBE

mariaminpeace From the ‘land of the free’: 30 Journalists Arrested Covering Occupy Movement | Care2 Causes care2.com/causes/30-jour

LeeDugas2001 Yhe US should learn from Iceland OccupyTheMedia.Org #OccupyMedia Iceland Arrests Former CEO Of Failed Bank dlvr.it/yg3r0

doolittlelady RT @JavaWinters: 13-Million out of work, 120-Thousand new jobs. A very long way to go.

GypsyAtSea Yesterday #Lincoln Center, today we #OccupyBroadway! My parents will be so proud… #owsabout

Your turn.

( Photo via OWS Press )

Read full story · Comments { 5 }

Gandhi, Frank Luntz and Occupying

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

I’ll get to Gandhi’s words in a bit, but first, the suggestions of Frank Luntz to the question: “How can Republicans do a better job of talking about Occupy Wall Street?” It’s worth a few minutes, in part, for entertainment, and in part because the suggestions surely do represent the thinking of some on the Right. And probably some on the Left.

Actually, I think Democrats need to be asking a similar question, and come up with better answers than avoid and ignore; express “shared concern” but provide little to no actions to address said concerns; and taking the words of the Occupation and trying to cram them into a campaign sound bite.

For now, get yourself ready for “how Republicans can do a better job of talking about OWS.” From Chris Moody, via Yahoo News:

The Republican Governors Association met this week in Florida to give GOP state executives a chance to rejuvenate, strategize and team-build. But during a plenary session on Wednesday, one question kept coming up: How can Republicans do a better job of talking about Occupy Wall Street? …

‘I’m so scared of this anti-Wall Street effort. I’m frightened to death,’ said Frank Luntz, a Republican strategist and one of the nation’s foremost experts on crafting the perfect political message. ‘They’re having an impact on what the American people think of capitalism.’

Luntz offered tips on how Republicans could discuss the grievances of the Occupiers, and help the governors better handle all these new questions from constituents about ‘income inequality’ and ‘paying your fair share.’

Sitting in on the session, Yahoo News identified ten suggestions.

1. Don’t say ‘capitalism.’
… we’re replacing it with either ‘economic freedom’ or ‘free market’ … .
2. Don’t say that the government ‘taxes the rich.’ Instead, tell them that the government ‘takes from the rich.’
3. Republicans should forget about winning the battle over the ‘middle class.’ Call them ‘hardworking taxpayers.’
4. Don’t talk about ‘jobs.’ Talk about ‘careers.’
5. Don’t say ‘government spending.’ Call it ‘waste.’
6. Don’t ever say you’re willing to ‘compromise.’
7. The three most important words you can say to an Occupier: ‘I get it.’
8. Out: ‘Entrepreneur.’ In: ‘Job creator.’
9. Don’t ever ask anyone you want them to ‘sacrifice.’
10. Always blame Washington.

Isn’t suggesting “don’t say capitalism” blasphemous? More significantly, here is what Think Progress had to say:

Frank Luntz is no minor pollster. … That Luntz is admitting the impact of Occupy Wall Street and the 99 Percent and telling closed-door meetings of Republicans that it frightens him is a huge victory for the movement.

Moving from the ridiculously revealing (I kept looking to see if he actually said this) to the thoughtful, about Gandhi, from OWS, regarding an action tonight:

A General Assembly at 10:30 PM at Lincoln Center. Join us in an open conversation about the effects of increased privatization and corporatization of all aspects of society, and the use of nonviolent civil disobedience around the world to reclaim the commons.

Composer Philip Glass will join the general assembly and mic-check a statement.

It is no doubt timely that Philip Glass’ opera ‘Satyagraha’ – which depicts Gandhi’s early struggle against colonial oppression in South Africa — should be revived by the Metropolitan Opera in 2011 … .

Satyagraha is a Sanskrit word meaning ‘truth-force,’ and we at Occupy Wall Street, by exercising tactics of nonviolent direct action inspired by those championed by Gandhi, have insisted that the truth be told: … We have lost homes, jobs, affordable education, natural resources, and access to public space.

Also today, via OWS’ Twitter feed:

QOWSt World AIDS Day rally starts at 10AM in Liberty Plaza NYC. Followed by march and direct action. …

ByeByeDWI RT @BostonGlobe: #OccupyBoston and the city are headed to court today at 9 a.m. b.globe.com/tipGRi #OWS

And this, via OWS:

The NYC Central Labor Council has called a march on Dec 1st for Jobs and Economic Fairness BOLD that’s ‘not just for the labor movement, but for everyone who is frustrated and worried about the growing economic disparity in this country. It’s for anyone who has ever agonized about finding a job, paying for college, meeting a mortgage payment, or how to buy enough food for dinner.’ #OWS will be there.

And thanks to Art for this Occupy DC Action Alert regarding the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, via Huffington:

What – Occupy DCCC
When – 5 PM, Thursday, December 1
Where – Gathering at McPherson Square, marching to 727 15th St NW

On the two-month anniversary of Occupy DC representing the voices and interests of the 99%, we will march on a Democratic Party fundraiser charging $5,000-$75,000 per dinner. This elitist event is indicative of how the Democrats represent a major part of our government’s failure to represent 99% of its citizenry.

The Huffington piece included this:

A Democratic operative, responding to the action alert, noted that there may be a political upside: Republicans will have a harder time accusing Washington Democrats of orchestrating the Occupy movement.

Thanks to Taylor for this one, from Politico:

A source sends over the transcript of an interesting robocall made last week, talking up the Occupy movement but without a group taking credit for it:

‘This Thanksgiving we need to think about what ‘Liberty and justice for all’ really means. Consider these facts: the big banks have foreclosed our homes, shipped our jobs overseas and are sitting on over $10 trillion while our nation goes bankrupt. … We the 99 percent can make a difference. Call the White House, Congress and City Hall. Tell them that liberty and justice for all means breaking up the big banks and jailing the Wall Street con men.’

It’s rare for the group behind a robocall like this one to avoid taking credit for it, and raises the question of who’s spending money promoting Occupy.

I’ve seen guesses about who’s behind the calls ranging from Obama to the Koch brothers to “terrorists.”

Personally, I’ll keep hoping for more “truth-force.”

(Poster via OccupyDesign)

Read full story · Comments { 2 }

Evictions, walk outs, and creative resistance … just another day of Occupation

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

As expected, Occupy Philly and LA camps were evicted last night. Occupy Oklahoma and Dayton are facing deadlines. Most likely other sites will do the same. About last night’s actions, media and Occupy reports indicate largely peaceful evictions and arrests. Both LAPD and Occupy LA have talked about fairly good relations, in general. It was still what an NPR affiliate station reporter called the “largest police action” he’d seen in LA., with some 1400 officers making more than 200 arrests. But it mostly occurred without resistance or excessive force. The same reporter said he heard the occasional individual apparently trying to “provoke” police, but when that happened, Occupiers around that individual immediately called for him / her to stop, emphasizing peaceful words and actions.

You can read more, and find links to two sets of photos of the “Raid at #OLA” at Occupy Los Angeles.

In Philadelphia, a reported 40 to 50 arrests were made. Apparently most Occupiers moved, as ordered, to sidewalks. Some chose to stay and be arrested. Things didn’t escalate to the extent we’ve seen elsewhere, but horses were once again used to move into a crowd. There’s a video here in which you can see some of this happening.

As I keep saying, I don’t think the Occupy / 99% movement will end with the evictions because the spaces created for conversations and actions are simply much bigger than the physical encampments. The movement itself is much bigger than, and too different from, the existing political system to be accepted as is.

The general movement isn’t limited to the U.S., of course. From England today are press reports of “two million” people engaged in a “walk out” related to the “austerity” measures taken by the government. The reports say these are people primarily from the public sector. Predictions that passengers at Heathrow would encounter long waits weren’t accurate (as of my last check), because the government sent people from various offices and departments to do the work of those who walked out. Which, one would reasonably assume, means the work those government employees usually do went undone. Among other things, the public sector workers are reacting to proposed cuts in their pensions as an “austerity” measure. It’s another indication of a familiar OWS’ message: “The banks got bailed out, we got sold out.”

The “what happens next with OWS” questions continue. I don’t think anyone knows, as Occupiers continue making decisions in the “horizontal” model of General Assemblies, emphasize peaceful actions, and affirm their position outside the Two Party System. Here are a few examples of some of the actions being taken, including in NYC, where eviction from Zuccotti did not end the movement.

With over 70 acts lined up, Occupy Broadway announces:

On December 2, 2011 New York artists will introduce tourists and New Yorkers going to Broadway shows or shopping themselves into debt to the idea of occupation as CREATIVE resistance with non-stop free performances.

From Occupy Chicago, The Occupied Chicago Tribune is announced, “a four-page broadsheet newspaper with an anticipated first issue print run of 20,000.” When much of media is so entwined with The System which is being challenged, other ways to disseminate accurate information, and different ideas, are devised. This isn’t new. It happened long before Twitter or “the personal computer” or a copy machine existed. But it’s as important now as in every other challenge to The System.

One relevant tweet: “kiplet RT @luketadams: If only Woodward & Bernstein had known that the authorities didn’t want them to report on Watergate…”

I heard or read, in at least four different stories today regarding Occupy LA and Philly, reporters asking some version of: “How can Occupy maintain it self without the camps as a focus?” I hear in that: “How can they expect us to keep paying attention if we don’t have our accustomed visuals? How can they expect to succeed if they don’t do things the way they’re ‘suppose’ to?”

I recently included actions by Move To Amend in examples of possible co-opting efforts. This news, from Occupy Denver, seems to provide an example of efforts to work together, an encouraging thing. From Occupy Denver:

On Monday, November 28, a representative from Move to Amend participated in the General Assembly and proposed Occupy Denver join with other Occupations like Miami, Memphis, and Nashville in endorsing the passage of Move To Amend’s Amendment intended to curb the pernicious effects of corporate personhood.

Perhaps we’ll see more such efforts of working together. Organizations like Move to Amend have important jobs to do, and finding ways to work together is significant. But it seems a bit strange to me when assumptions are made that it’s the job of Occupy to do the work of “inside the System” organizations. Different kinds of work, different roles to play, but with good possibilities of joining forces around particular projects and actions.

As more Occupied sites are shut down, the evolution of ideas and actions continues. This Saturday, for example, “Is there life after eviction?” will be discussed at an “Occupy Portland Town Hall” gathering, at First Unitarian Church.

Occupy Portland’s Vision & Strategy Committee invites you and members of your communities to join us for conversation, food, and networking. We want to provide a friendly setting for dialogue, to explore the varied views people have of Occupy Wall Street and Occupy Portland. As more and more camps are being dismantled, many wonder what might be next. We invite campers, supporters, curious bystanders, skeptics … to join us to pause and reflect on what we think OWS and OP have accomplished, and where the movement might be headed.

Our hope is to follow this Town Hall with many more open discussions, to sustain the dialogue that has been started and to help shape of the movement’s future.

We often hear that “democracy is a messy process.” An actual democratic process isn’t neat and tidy. The emergence of a different way of organizing and working is just as messy. You learn as you go, create and revise, make mistakes and make progress. As long as the reasons for the actions remain, actions can evolve. Or, as this tweet puts it:

TCFdotorg Richard Leone: Occupy Politics: Until the causes of its discontent are addressed, the movement has staying power http://t.co/mH5MVPq7#OWS.

(Occupy LA Eviction photo via Occupy LA.
Occupy Broadway flyer via Occupennial.)

Read full story · Comments { 1 }

Challenging the corporate occupation

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

A continued search for a “leader,” if not a “savior,” from and as defined by the same Two Corporate Party System that brought us to this Occupied moment, would be, at best, to keep repeating the same mistakes. Worse, it’s to cooperate with our own continued decline. Not surprisingly, there is a great deal being said and written about the “meaning” of the Occupy / 99% movement. A part of that conversation is about leadership.

A “Statement of Autonomy” from the NYC General Assembly, is clear:

Occupy Wall Street is a people’s movement. It is party-less, leaderless, by the people and for the people. It is not a business, a political party, an advertising campaign or a brand. It is not for sale. …

We wish to clarify that Occupy Wall Street is not and never has been affiliated with any established political party, candidate or organization. …

Any organization is welcome to support us with the knowledge that doing so will mean questioning your own institutional frameworks of work and hierarchy and integrating our principles into your modes of action.

SPEAK WITH US, NOT FOR US.

And there is where many simply can’t or won’t go. “Questioning your own institutional frameworks” is too fundamental, too damn scary. On November 10, Matt Taibbi wrote a piece that speaks to this, in Politics: How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love the OWS Protests:

Occupy Wall Street … (is) about providing a forum for people to show how tired they are not just of Wall Street, but everything. … by being so broad in scope and so elemental in its motivation, it’s flown over the heads of many on both the right and the left. …

As the Occupy Movement transitions, with physically occupying public spaces still a key piece, but multiple other actions and ideas emerging, you can see a couple of things happening. On the Right, of course, are gleeful shouts of “Look, we made the dirty f’king hippies go away!” On the Left, we see increasing efforts to co-opt. I know I keep bringing this up, but that’s because it keeps happening.

A recent MoveOn.org mailing:

That’s why on Thursday, Dec. 1, we’re organizing ‘99% Congressional Speak-Outs’ at the local offices of our senators and representatives. We’ll expose Republicans for making it their top priority to protect millionaires instead of creating jobs—and we’ll call on Democrats to fight hard to help Americans get back to work and stay in their homes.

I’ll be interested to see how they “call on Democrats” to do something that should have been a priority for a few years now. More to the current point, this is a prime example of jumping on the bandwagon someone else built, after it’s picked up some speed. Or, as this tweet puts it: “Dirtyfknhippy RT @KBZeese: No to Co-Option: MoveOn is the Opposite of the Occupy Movement owsnews.org/?p=8891.”

I’m guessing, but don’t know, that “@KBZeese” is Kevin Zeese, who wrote, from Occupy Washington, DC :

The corporate media is anointing a false leader of the Occupy Movement in Van Jones of Rebuild the Dream.

The former Obama administration official, who received a golden parachute at Princeton and the Democratic think tank Center for American Progress when he left the administration, is doing what Democrats always do – see the energy of an independent movement, race to the front, then lead it down a dead end and essentially destroy it. Jones is doing the dirty work of a Democratic operative and while he and other Dem front groups pretend to support Occupiers, their real mission is to co-opt it. …

These Dem front groups operate within the confines of the two corrupt parties and their agenda is limited by what big business interests say is politically realistic. Rebuild the Dream is more of the same that has been seen over and over from groups like MoveOn and Campaign for America’s Future – elect Democrats is their mantra. It is their only program. And, it is bankrupt.

And then there’s this, from MoveToAmend:

Move to Amend Occupies the Courts!

Inspired by our friends at Occupy Wall Street, and Dr. Cornel West, Move To Amend is planning bold action to mark the second anniversary of the infamous Citizens United v. FEC decision!

Occupy the Courts will be a one day occupation of Federal courthouses across the country, including the U.S. Supreme Court … on Friday January 20, 2012. …

Americans across the country are on the march, and they are marching OUR way. They carry signs that say, ‘Corporations are NOT people! Money is NOT Speech!’

Grabbing on and using whatever is working is classic marketing, from movies to apps to beer to politics. And since we’re less than a year out from 2012 elections it’s no surprise that both Corporate Parties are using the Occupy / 99% movement for their own ends. Of course the Occupiers and 99%-ers make mistakes, will need to keep learning and evolving and refining and trying new things. But the very fact that they’re being used by both Left and Right argues that they’re “doing something right.”

As Larry Pinkney writes at Intrepid Report:

… Th(e) protracted struggle on the part of everyday Black, White, Brown, Red, and Yellow people is not without its inevitable contradictions which must be addressed … . Nonetheless, an important initial victory has already been won. … the fact that the ‘OCCUPATION’ movement is bringing about a very important increase in the political consciousness of everyday people. …

… the corporate Democratic Party foxes and the corporate Republican Party wolves are attempting to exploit these contradictions in an effort to co-opt, discredit, neutralize, and ultimately destroy this growing people’s movement.

And that is one fundamental point: an actual “people’s movement” challenges the Corporate Occupation of our nation.

(Corporations Are Not People poster via Occupy Posters)

Read full story · Comments { 6 }

Occupy: Day 73, and deadlines come and go

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

Among the latest of the Occupations to be given a deadline by which they had to leave, or law enforcement would evict the Occupants are Occupy Philly and Occupy Los Angeles. As of a short time ago, via OWS, “Occupy Philly Still Standing Strong.”

And at Occupy LA, last night’s 12 AM deadline to disperse was not enforced. As the sun came up, the livestream at OWS included shots of LAPD officers leaving in vans, as well as a friendly conversation with someone identified as “Capt. Smith,” who smiled and talked about the “peaceful” way most Occupiers acted – as an Occupier walked by and asked the officer, “Can I buy you a cup of coffee?”. Capt. Smith added that there were a few people (among the Occupiers) who “didn’t get it,” and threw a few things at his officers; there were “three or four” people arrested. But according to what he, and Occupiers, said, it was a basically peaceful evening. He was asked, “What do you think will happen tonight, at midnight?” in terms of what the city officials would instruct the PD to do, and he said, “I don’t know,” but went on to focus on keeping things as peaceful as possible.

I’ll bet most Occupiers, and most law enforcement officers, agree with that. According to Occupiers in the livestream feed, the people who, as Capt. Smith described them, “didn’t get it,” were not individuals the Occupiers recognized. This, of course, is nothing new. But what’s also nothing new is that it’s the non-peaceful moments and actions by law enforcement and by those among (though not necessarily of) the Occupiers that inevitably get media attention. Maybe that’s why they miss so much of the many things that are going on. A few examples, as I’ve seen them at various Occupy web sites: the NYC People’s Library is now “on wheels”; Zuccotti, and other sites of “evictions,” are still spaces where Occupiers gather during the day for meetings and simply to have a presence, and where some will remain overnight, though not in tents or any other “structure”; Occupy the Board Room; Boycott Black Friday; #OCCUPYXMAS; General Strikes, marches and sit-ins. And these:

Via Occupy Boston:

At Dewey Square today, Monday, November 28, you will see six barber stools representing the six biggest banks: JPMorganChase, Bank of America, Citibank, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs. From 3pm to 6pm, skilled barbers will operate at each of these stations, providing free haircuts to occupiers and supporters. …
In banking, a ‘haircut’ is when a bank or other lender adjusts the terms of a loan to decrease the debt on the borrower. While banks routinely take ‘haircuts’ when dealing with large corporations and wealthy clients, they rarely do the same when dealing with members of the 99% who are paying back mortgage loans, student loans, credit card loans and other debts.

You can keep up with what’s going on through a relatively recent addition to online sites: Occupy TV “aggregate(s) videos from Occupy protests worldwide.”

Another online tool, Occupy Map,

is intended to serve as a central point for movement-wide reporting of a variety of incidents and situations:

Locations of active Occupations/General Assemblies
Actions: events, protests, etc.

Police Incidents

Medical situations

Further categories, and refinement of existing ones, will be going on for a while … .

From OWS, “DC, Other Cities Liberate Unoccupied Buildings for the 99%”:

Occupations across the world have recently adopted the tactic of taking over unoccupied buildings. In New York, students and allies occupied New School buildings and dropped leaflets and banners from inside during the N17 Day of Action. In North Carolina and Oakland, protesters occupied vacant downtown buildings.

At Occupy Denver:

This Saturday (Nov. 26) Occupy Denver is proud to announce its first ever Children’s March … . From our first march, we have been blessed to have so many young people marching with us. …

Last Monday Occupy Denver was blessed with a fieldtrip of 50 or more 7-8th graders from the Logan School. We were blown away by the questions they asked, their understanding of the issues, and their enthusiasm.

From Iraq Veterans Against the Way:

has been a voice for veterans and their grievances since our founding in 2004. We understand that change comes about when people speak up, organize, and demand justice. Veterans and active-duty service members have a history of organizing, from the Bonus March to the Vietnam War. Iraq and Afghanistan veterans have an important contribution to make to this movement.

As veterans and members of the 99% we stand in solidarity with the Occupy Movement.

Most of these are actions unlikely to get much media attention, but then, the Occupy Movement isn’t so much a “protest” as a “process.” That presents problems and challenges for everyone accustomed to the controlled gatherings that have become the standard: city officials, law enforcement, media, analysts (Left, Right, Center) academics … everyone has to adjust, or resist adjusting. Occupy certainly draws on historical activism, but just as occurred in those earlier moments, evolving and new ideas are essential. One last illustration of what’s happening and being said, via a few announcements, ideas and thoughts from the Twitter feed at OWS:

Big_Red_Star #occupyyourself #Ows PROTEST ALERT-Occupy the CUNY Board of Trustees, TODAY, 4-8pm, Baruch College, 24th and Lexington Ave.

DEADHEAD1776 RT @occupybot: RT @studentactivism If the #Occupy movement is ‘camping’ then the lunch-counter sit-ins of 1960 were ‘hanging out at the malt shop.’

Jeff_Raines A question of focus is always divisive. RT @PolicyMic Occupy the hood: Should #OWS focus on the bottom half of the 99%? bit.ly/s2wmVS

ATRACZZ RT @blogdiva: RT @an0nyc: @MichaelSkolnik <– 100% Right. The #Occupy movement is not about standoffs with police, this is an #IntentionalDistraction

MichaelWeschler RT @Occupy_Provo: RT @LOLGOP: I’ll remind you that a crowd smaller than #OccupyLA owns more than the bottom 150,000,000 Americans combined.

Of course there is always some continuity in activism. In this morning’s livestream from Occupy LA, I heard one. A woman, off camera, said of an Occupier’s call to “keep it peaceful”: “Right on.” Sometimes eras sort of blend together.

(“Cannot Evict an Idea” poster via OWS.
“Not Protest but Process” poster via Occupy Together.)

Read full story · Comments { 6 }

Symbolizing why Occupy is needed: “those not affected … continued shopping”

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

The Occupy narrative continues to evolve. Like most if not every “line” employed by a movement, the language of “Occupy,” the “1%” and “99%” is, to a significant extent, symbolic. The Occupiers and their supporters seem well aware that the 99% are not monolithic. Obviously the top of the 99% are in a very different position than those at the other end of the spectrum. And while it involves far smaller numbers of people, it’s also true that the 1% are not identical. For one thing, the miniscule number of people who occupy the top .1% of that already tiny 1% are separated by millions or billions.

The important point is, the “symbolic” represents real people, as the hand gestures which have developed symbolize a way of expression and organizing. Some words from those people, via the OWS’s Twitter feed:

manseydoll RT @TCBGP: “@buc_three: Why is it easier to believe that 150,000,000 Americans are being lazy rather than 400 Americans being greedy?

Mercypolitics Thanksgiving For What? 46.2 Million Americans Are Living in Poverty j.mp/rykuZf

Cris7123 RT @several_: The proper response to “Get a job!” is “Oh? Are you hiring?”

SparklySnarkery RT @LavenderLobster: It’s pointless to yell “Get a job!” at the jobless unless you are offering one.

In a Thanksgiving Day column, Paul Krugman wrote:

‘We are the 99 percent’ is a great slogan. It correctly defines the issue as being the middle class versus the elite (as opposed to the middle class versus the poor). And it also gets past the common but wrong establishment notion that rising inequality is mainly about the well educated doing better than the less educated; the big winners in this new Gilded Age have been a handful of very wealthy people, not college graduates in general.

If anything, however, the 99 percent slogan aims too low. A large fraction of the top 1 percent’s gains have actually gone to an even smaller group, the top 0.1 percent — the richest one-thousandth of the population.

Occupy and similar movements and projects not only seem to “get” what the slogans and symbols are pointing to, they “get” that it’s necessary to look outside the Two Party Front for the Oligarchy for solutions. One tweet in this regard: “SilverJediShade We face the same political parties that have oppressed the peoples voice in the 60’s and in 1999.”

And for one example of how existing organizations and efforts, and the Occupy movement, are working together in identifying the problems and seeking solutions, check out Movement for Justice in El Barrio, posted yesterday at OWS.

UNANIMOUSLY ENDORSED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF OCCUPY WALL ST., THE PEOPLE OF COLOR CAUCUS …, WOMEN OCCUPYING WALL ST., QUEERING OWS, IMMIGRANT/WORKERS WORKING GROUP, OUTREACH WORKING GROUP, SPANISH WORKING GROUP …, THE ANTI-RACISM ALLIES GROUP, ARTS & CULTURE WORKING GROUP, & EMPOWERMENT AND COMMUNITY WORKING GROUP.

… We are a community in resistance. Here in the streets of East Harlem we have fought multinational corporations who try to take away our homes and destroy our community. We have fought the politicians who try to buy our dignity and sell our community. We have fought by exercising our autonomy and building a democratic space without hierarchy where we make decisions through community-wide consultation and direct democratic participation. …

We fight against the capitalist system and all politicians, both Democrat and Republican, that tend and maintain the system in order to reap its benefits for themselves. We refuse to be bound and gagged by politicians who betray us and we will build something outside of the boxes they build to contain us.

Of course, efforts such as “Justice in El Barrior” are met with the usual anti-anything that doesn’t fit my way of thinking judgments. About the following sort of Thanksgiving Day actions, I saw one “thoughtful” tweet: “Dirty f’ing hippies trying to make themselves look good.” From OWS:

Today, Occupations across the U.S. have shown that the 99% Movement can do more than protest—we can also take care of one another. Across the world, people still reeling from homelessness, poverty, foreclosures, and economic inequality have a lot less to be thankful for. But today, we reminded ourselves … that we can still be thankful for our mutual solidarity. From D.C. to Oakland and everywhere in between, Occupiers sat down for communal meals. Others marked Thanksgiving by honoring indigenous Native communities and First Nations who continue to fight for their land and sovereignty against colonialism and corporate greed.

Slogans and symbols are, of course, a part of activism. “We are the 99%” and “Occupy” are the current, and quite successful, words and actions which serve to unite and empower. Other symbols have also gained widespread recognition. One of the latest is photos and videos of various law enforcement officers using pepper spray as a “control” option of choice. In general, pepper spray has become a symbol of one facet of the political – and economic / social – system of “wealth inequality.” And apparently, it’s becoming an option for non-law enforcement people, too.

You’ve likely seen this story, but because in itself, it’s symbolic of this moment, or rather, the last several decades: a Black Friday shopper uses pepper spray in her battle to buy. Probably not the high grade spray available to law enforcement, but enough for her purposes. Via The Guardian:

Walmart shopper in LA pepper-sprays rivals

Police hunt for ‘competitive shopper’ who attacked 20 others to keep them away from Black Friday sales bargains

Bargain hunters at a Walmart in Los Angeles were hurt when a fellow shopper attacked them with pepper spray as the doors opened on the US’s holiday shopping season. …

Officials said 20 people suffered injuries. …

(Police Lieutenant) Parga said police were still looking for the woman. The store remained open and those not affected by the pepper spray continued shopping.

That last sentence might just be a way to summarize the thinking of some people regarding the inequities to which Occupy is pointing: “those not affected … continued shopping.”

( Occupy Hand Signals poster via Occupy Posters )

Read full story · Comments { 6 }