Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

A recent tweet, at Occupy USA: “Boots Riley tweets: ‘Mainstream media has moved from saying #OWS has no power, 2 sayin that we have power but r misguided.’”
“Nothing like some success to bring out the people who tell you what you’re doing wrong.” That was said to me years ago, following the most successful fundraising event a particular LGBT organization had ever had. I’ve been thinking about that, related to Occupy.
Unable to pretend that Occupy isn’t having successes, media, pundits, Electeds and others have turned to telling the Occupiers that they don’t know how to build on those successes. One significant part of the advice, or lecture, is about how Occupy is / should be related to politics, mostly with regard to the Democratic Party.
There are headlines like, “What Occupy Must / Should / Is Failing To Do.” Some, from both supportive and non-supportive perspectives, I find thoughtful. But the question of what to do related to the political status quo was being addressed, by Occupiers, from the beginning. I don’t think it surprises anyone that there are differing Occupier opinions and ideas, though to this point, that Occupy is not a political party, nor does it support any political party, seems to remain dominant.
Of course, it’s not an either / or situation – occupy or work within the existing electoral system. Those engaged in either or both can talk, share ideas, goals, even actions. And given the “horizontal” methods of decision making, each Occupy group will make its own choices.
From my perspective, though, it’s not Occupy’s job to do the work of reforming the Democratic party. There can be overlap, but the “outside” voice is what’s creating the conversation and the “pushing” of the Electeds. Of course Democratic related organizations would have stepped up their game in 2012, whether or not Occupy had ever happened. But Occupy has pushed those organizations, has pushed the Dem party, and has pushed the efforts toward “third parties” in ways that couldn’t have come from inside.
“Occupy will never die; Evict us, we multiply!” is the headline at a Dec. 10 posting at OWS. If you read nothing else, read this:
To the 1%’s pundits who claim Occupy is over: We are still here. Even as the agents of the 1% evict our communities and eviscerate our rights, we are evolving. …
Occupations across the country have found creative ways to persist, resist, and rebuild. … Last we checked, tents still stand in DC, Chicago, Boise, Oklahoma City, Buffalo, Miami, Chapel Hill, Cleveland, Providence, Baltimore, Orlando, Nashville, Pittsburgh, Pensacola, Lexington, Newark, Gainesville, Peoria, Eugene, Rochester, Orlando, Tacoma, Reno, Charlotte, Raleigh, New Haven, Houston, Austin, Tampa, Louisville, and elsewhere. In Anchorage, they even have igloos. …
Occupiers in cities like Atlanta, Oakland, Fort Worth, Jackson, and Phoenix have cleverly responded to evictions by staying in the parks during the day and moving to the sidewalk at night. In Los Angeles, Toronto, San Diego, Portland, Tulsa, San Jose, Dayton, Tucson, Cincinnati, Kansas City, Sacramento, Hartford, Charlottesville, Denver, Dallas, Norfolk, Richmond, Philadelphia, New Orleans, and New York, evicted Occupations continue to hold General Assemblies and maintain busy calendars with daily meetings, events, workshops, teach-ins, marches, direct actions, and demonstrations at their local city hall, bank branch, corporate office, and courts.
We are also disrupting business-as-usual from Wall Street to K Street. … We mic check corrupt politicians and 1%ers everywhere they go. We have moved homeless families into empty foreclosed homes. We have spread our message by occupying the highway. …
While maintaining our nonpartisan focus on economic inequality and connecting a diversity of issues that impact the 99%, Occupations have begun to refine and hone our messaging around the big banks, foreclosures, evictions, and housing. …
We have marched on U.S.-companies that supply teargas to the Egyptian government … ; with immigrants rights activists against deportation, detention and wage-theft in Birmingham and New York; with seniors to advocate for social services; with students against tuition-hikes, with workers and unions for jobs, better working conditions, and fair wages; and with farmers fighting for food justice. … We’ve marched to draw attention to the connections between the corrupt banking system and issues like the prison industrial complex and climate change.
This is merely a sketch of the ongoing work of the Occupy Wall Street movement. … And we’re just getting started.
What are the politics of the Occupy movement? And how do you change an entrenched and stacked against you political system?
If OWS disappeared (which I don’t think likely, though it will surely continue evolving), what then? Would we just go back to pre-Occupation days, and the familiar “lesser of two evils,” “after this election we can start to change things,” “voting in third parties is only voting for (whichever candidate you oppose), or a ‘wasted’ vote,” and all the other familiar Two Party rhetoric? Occupy isn’t the only way to challenge “the system,” but they’ve done more to change the broad conversation in the last few months than anyone else has in the last several years, if not decades.
If the movement shifts to a largely or strictly Insider game, then I think a major opportunity will have been lost. I actually don’t think that’s what will happen, that Occupy will – as the Democratic Party so obviously wants them to do – become assimilated into the Dem Party. Just as obviously, I could be wrong about that. But advocacy requires some degree of autonomy. If the people you’re seeking to influence know they’ll get your ultimate support, no matter what, there’s little to zero incentive to listen to you, much less respond to you.
The tweet with which I began: “Mainstream media has moved from saying #OWS has no power, 2 sayin that we have power but r misguided.” What “misguided” means, of course, is that the MSM, among others, thinks they should provide the correct “guidance.” But like the movement itself, the politics of the Occupy movement are evolving, and doing so at a grassroots level, with a grassroots guidance.
( Poster via Occupy Posters )