TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Tag Archives | energy

Pres. Obama Already has Your Vote and He Knows It

This article was first published for U.S. News & World Report, under the title “Time for a Tea Party of the Left”.

President Obama takes his base for granted on issues like the Bush tax cuts, Plan B, and the economy

Here we are at the beginning of Pres. Obama’s reelection and what do we find? The Bush tax cuts that, back in 2008, candidate Obama pledged he’d fight to repeal, but which as president he extended. Considering not extending them began as his base position, three years into his first term it’s not too much to ask how Democrats allowed themselves to get twisted into this policy pretzel.

That’s exactly where Obama’s got his Democratic and progressive base, which has absolutely no resemblance to the Tea Party, who began challenging the Republican establishment back during George W. Bush’s term. The efforts finally ended up making history in 2010, with state legislatures across the country went Republican. It started an assault on the middle class, unions, as well as a war on women’s freedoms that ended up turning Wisconsin and Ohio upside down, but boy did it change the debate.

Now Newt Gingrich, once a speaker of the House, is running on an anti-establishment, anti-Washington platform spouting Tea Party populism as the new change message. In South Carolina, Newt sang the Tea Party’s tune and the right wing base rewarded him with a win, leaving the establishment mouths agape.

Where’s the Democratic version of the Tea Party? You’d think after Obama’s anti-progressive economics, foreign policy, and adoption of Bush antiterrorism policies (though to a more methodically lethal, anti-progressive effect), the Democratic base would have taken the Tea Party template and run with it by now.

Obama got away with the healthcare plan, which was bargained behind closed doors with private insurance and drug companies, manifesting a product that hasn’t kept costs down. He negotiated with himself, as he did on the stimulus, instead of using the majority he had in Congress to press the case for a public option that would have tackled healthcare costs, our biggest foe. It was never considered.

When Obama recently decided not to relax restrictions on the emergency contraceptive Plan B, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi gave him a pass, while the Colorado Democratic Rep. Diana DeGette, a member of the so called “Pro-Choice Caucus,” stated she was “disappointed.” There are never any repercussions for such decisions on the left, while repercussions have defined the Tea Party and its power on the right.

Understand that Plan B has nothing to do with abortion. It simply makes a female’s womb inhospitable for implantation and has been found absolutely safe by the F.D.A. However, as an ode to independents in an election season, Obama made a decision that any Republican would have made.

But not to worry, a carrot wasn’t far behind. The Department of Health and Human Services recently announced that universal contraceptive coverage will now be part of every employer healthcare plan, with religious-affiliated hospitals and institutions getting a one-year delay to comply. It could have been done earlier, but an election year is prime time.

During the debate around Bowles-Simpson, entitlement “reform” was broached first by Obama, with cost-of-living increases on Social Security being considered by the White House. That this would hit women hardest and put them in poverty was evidently missed by the administration. It was scuttled when all hell broke loose.

There wasn’t a woman in the room during the debt ceiling debate, a time when entitlement “reforms” were being considered. Pelosi was only added after women’s groups held a conference call and writers started complaining.

Obama also cut home heating assistance for the poor at a time when the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy are in place.

During Obama’s first term, he’s sucked on the straw of cutting the deficit, while ignoring Democratic economics. The bully pulpit for progressive economics wasn’t used until re-election season, when he took to the stage at Osawatamie, Kan., channeling the Occupy Wall Street message while launching his 2012 campaign.

There’s the latest action on the Keystone XL Pipeline, at least a short-term win, but it’s not like he came out with gusto against it. Obama said no for now then blamed the Republicans for not giving him enough time to consider the environmental impact. Activists from the grass roots to Robert Redford applauded. We don’t even know if it’s a definite decision.

The Democratic base has a passive-aggressive relationship with Obama that resembles a dysfunctional love affair. He has all the power and the base has absolutely none, unless you count the gay and lesbian contingent which was as good a model as the Tea Party on how to get it done. It’s not that progressives couldn’t have power; it’s that they refuse to wield any.

So they cannot pressure Obama at election time because he knows his Democratic base will be there. After all, they’re not the Tea Party. It doesn’t matter if they’re unhappy, all that matters is he’s got their vote and he knows it.

Read full story · Comments { 18 }

Press Harassment Continues

“I’m within my First Amendment rights, and I’m being taken out,” Fox shouted as he was led away. – Josh Fox arrested at hearing, Politico

Josh Fox is an Oscar-nominated filmmaker. His documentary “Gasland” helped expose the dangers of unregulated natural gas fracking.

Read full story · Comments { 3 }

Crooks, Congress, Scalawags, and Spending

But after the vote, Casey and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y) dismissed the Keystone project as “inside baseball,” arguing that middle-class families are more interested in getting a tax cut than an oil pipeline. [...] “I was responsible for putting it in this bill,” Reid said flatly. “That’s how legislation works. … Along with Manchin, Vermont Sens. Patrick Leahy and Bernie Sanders, both members of the Democratic caucus, voted against the payroll package. – Politico

(Click on the picture for scathing Wall Street Journal article on Newt.)

In the complaint against the former Freddie Mac executives, the SEC alleged that they and Freddie Mac led investors to believe that the firm used a broad definition of subprime loans and was disclosing all of its Single-Family subprime loan exposure. Syron and Cook reinforced the misleading perception when they each publicly proclaimed that the Single Family business had “basically no subprime exposure.” Unbeknown to investors, as of December 31, 2006, Freddie Mac’s Single Family business was exposed to approximately $141 billion of loans internally referred to as “subprime” or “subprime like,” accounting for 10 percent of the portfolio, and grew to approximately $244 billion, or 14 percent of the portfolio, as of June 30, 2008. – SEC CHARGES FORMER FANNIE MAE AND FREDDIE MAC EXECUTIVES WITH SECURITIES FRAUD

 

The latest AP-GfK Poll shows the American electorate has very complicated feelings about Pres. Obama, as well as his challengers. It’s another poll that supports what I’ve been writing for months and months, as well as in my book. Yes, Pres. Obama is beatable, deserving challenges, with a majority of people believing he doesn’t deserve reelection. However, the alternative isn’t inspiring at all.

Although the public would prefer Obama be voted out of office, he fares relatively well in potential matchups with Republicans Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich. Another bit of good news for the Democrat: For the first time since spring, more adults said the economy got better in the past month than said it got worse.
The president’s approval rating on unemployment shifted upward — from 40 percent in October to 45 percent in the latest poll — as the jobless rate fell to 8.6 percent last month, its lowest level since March 2009.

But Obama’s approval rating on his handling of the economy overall remains stagnant: 39 percent approve and 60 percent disapprove.

The contest for who is more pro-Israel is now on. As Ben Smith noted in a piece this week, Ronald Reagan would have failed today’s GOP litmus test by a mile.

In Pres. Obama’s speech before the 71st General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism, a critical element to Israeli security was mostly left un-mined. From the New York Times:

Less than a year before the presidential election, a pattern is emerging. The Republicans will outdo themselves to say the most provocative things they can to demonstrate they love Israel more than anyone else. And President Obama will counter by saying as little as he can about the Palestinians.

Obama on the peace process:

“As president, I have never wavered in pursuit of a just and lasting peace — two states for two peoples; an independent Palestine alongside a secure Jewish State of Israel. I have not wavered and will not waver.”

That’s the bare minimum a U.S. president should ever say. However, anyone attempting to make the case that Pres. Obama is anti-Israel is standing in ideological quick sand.

Now over to the spending bill, which Politico characterizes as a “turning point,” with a report from Huffington Post saying Democrats are declaring victory:

The Democrats provided an extensive list of what they see as bragging points, saying the bill:

  • Prevents policy riders that would have restricted funding for Planned Parenthood and eliminated funding for Title X family planning programs, severely limiting women’s access to health care.
  • Prevents restrictions that would have reversed President Obama’s policy allowing family travel and money remittances to Cuba.
  • Saves 60,000 New Head Start slots created by the stimulus act and spends more than $550 million for the Race to the Top program.
  • Boosts the Student Aid Administration with nearly $50 million in new funding for loan servicing and collections.
  • Preserves the AmeriCorps program by stopping a GOP provision that would have cut the program.

They also pointed to a string of riders that were cut from the bill, including items that would have:

  • Barred use of funds for the CPSC’s public product safety database, SaferProducts.gov.
  • Cut federal funding of National Public Radio
  • Stopped a new military chaplain training curriculum written after the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell
  • Ended the Home Affordable Modification Program, which aims to help homewoners avoid foreclosure
  • Prohibited use federal funds to develop and finalize EPA rules naming coal ash as a hazardous waste
  • Stopped the FCC from implementing new neutrality rules
  • Stopped federal spending to run and implement the heath reform law until 90 days after any legal challenges are complete.
  • Republicans also declared wins in adding many other restrictions, including blocking a phaseout of 100-watt incandescent lightbulbs, stopping express funding for a number of President Obama’s “czars,” cutting the budget overall, and placing restrictions on funding for the United Nations.

Yet it was some of the things that made it into the bill that attracted scathing denunciations from Republicans concerned about waste, especially in the defense budget.

[...] “There’s $3.5 billion of unrequested, unauthorized [spending] … projects like for Guam. You thought the Bridge to Nowhere was bad?” McCain said. “This is 53 civilian school buses and 53 repair kits for $10.7 million; $12.7 million for a cultural artifacts repository. That’s in the name of defense.

“I have amendments to save the taxpayers billions of dollars as associated with this bill,” McCain said. “But never mind because we’re going to go home for Christmas.”

Oh, and the latest attack against Pres. Obama surrounds the cost of the First Family’s Christmas vacation.

Bah! Humbug!

Read full story · Comments { 3 }

DONE DEAL: Payroll Tax Cut Extension Comes with Keystone XL

This is why people don’t trust Congress. It’s also why people want another option besides Democrats and Republicans, with an independent force desperately needed in Congress.

Governing in two-month increments, while Democrats cave on principle after principle. It just never ends.

From Politico:

Senate leaders struck a tentative deal Friday night to extend the payroll tax rate and jobless benefits through the end of February, electing to punt tough economic decisions into the new year.

[...] In the frenzy of deal-making Friday evening, Republicans won a major concession: The package includes a provision prodding Obama to make a decision on the controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline, which has divided labor groups from environmental activists in the Democratic ranks.

Do you notice lately that all we keep reading about is Democrats make a “major concession”? The translation of that is Republicans win again.

Now it’s over to Pres. Obama to finally stand on a line on Keystone XL. Or maybe he’ll find a way around it, though that would take some political gamesmanship, which Democrats don’t seem to do anymore.

Read full story · Comments { 14 }

Boehner & McConnell: Keystone XL or No Payroll Tax Extension

The next time you hear anyone on the right say Democrats don’t compromise I hope you will laugh in his or her face, then buy the person a drink.

You’ve really got to hand it to Republicans.

It’s déjà vu all over again, bringing back memories of this time last year when Pres. Obama allowed Republicans to squeeze him on extending the Bush tax cuts, which added to the deficit and became an unbelievable pain for progressives.

Just this week, Democratic lawmakers caved on the millionaire surtax as well and now Speaker Boehner has laid down the gauntlet on the payroll tax extension package that includes an unemployment benefit extension.

From Politico:

Republicans say they’re not budging on the pipeline. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell told POLITICO on Friday: “The House will not pass a product without Keystone.”

Sen. Mitch McConnell has joined him. From Brian Beutler:

Regarding that legislation, Don Stewart, a spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell emails me with the following statement: “The Leader will not support any bill without the Keystone XL language as part of the agreement.”

As I’ve written before, Pres. Obama likely postponed a decision on the Keystone Pipeline out of his own political interests. It’s likely, in my opinion, that if he gets reelected he’ll give the go ahead on it.

This is something McConnell may or may not be betting on, but the Republican Leader does know that for his side it’s a good talking point to say that Democrats would rather the middle class face a tax increase than okay a project that will not only make us less dependent on foreign oil, but also create jobs. To McConnell, Pres. Obama is denying a tax cut for the middle class, new energy sources and the creation of jobs, all because of extremist environmental wackos, as Rush Limbaugh call people opposed to Keystone.

It doesn’t matter that Sen. McConnell’s portrayal is pure cynical politics. He’s betting it’s a sound bite that sings, at least with the right, which is all that matters.

The one thing you rarely will hear from Senate Democrats, especially on economics, where they always get behind, is “we’re not going to budge.” However, giving in on the Keystone Pipeline would be a monumental embarrassment and tectonic setback for the environmental movement.

Senate Democrats didn’t outright reject the Keystone idea on Friday morning. [...] Senate leaders hoped to get a deal on a year-long proposal, but weren’t ruling out a two-month deal as a fall-back plan. (Politico)

Pres. Obama and the Democrats are once again being beaten on the politics. They’ve simply shown no game at all. If Republicans win on their Keystone demands, it will be a very sour note on which to end the year.

Read full story · Comments { 10 }

Would Obama Veto Payroll Cut Bill If it Includes Keystone Pipeline?

Republicans believe that after weeks of taking a pounding from Obama over the payroll tax issue, they finally found a rallying point over the Keystone pipeline. “Everybody sees the president’s delay on the Keystone pipeline [for] what it is: He doesn’t want to choose between his political base, labor and environmentalists,” said Texas Sen. John Cornyn, who heads up the Republican Conference’s 2012 efforts. But even though Democratic senators like Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Mark Pryor of Arkansas support the pipeline project, top Senate Democrats are confident they’ll remove “extraneous” GOP provisions. – Politico

Right-leaning The Hill news outlet has a different take.

For House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), there’s nothing like a presidential veto threat to make his job easier.

Pres. Obama delaying his decision on the Keystone Pipeline is like everything he does, it’s about his reelection and motivated by politics.

But while Republicans won’t tax millionaires, they are also trying to cut federal unemployment insurance benefits substantially too, as almost 1 million people are about to see the end to the aid in January.

So this is a very interesting development with the Keystone gambit smart for Republicans if they’d give on the millionaire surtax, but they won’t. It would also provide Pres. Obama an out, something that’s always appreciated by any politician.

If he caves on Keystone, it’s like what he did last year on extending the Bush tax cuts, but lately Obama doesn’t seem to be in that same mood. In 2010, he’d just come off a brutal shellacking in the midterms. Looking at Republicans today, Newt at the top of the ticket, with Santa coming early giving Obama reelect The Donald’s Apprentice debate (if it still happens, because most aren’t showing up), Pres. Obama is in the power position.

Nothing counts unless the Senate can pass the bill. But if they do, something that doesn’t happen often these days, and it comes to Pres. Obama’s desk, will he actually veto it?

In the background is what Barack Obama would likely do in a second term, with no political threat left. I believe he’d okay the Keystone Pipeline, because he’d be safe to rack up what the White House would call accomplishments. This isn’t Yucca Mountain, which I lived through out west. There’s a lot of ignorance about the environmental dangers of Keystone, with Democrats like former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell saying that people will be protected environmentally from the dangers of what the Keystone could bring.

So, imagine a Cordray recess appointment, coupled with an Obama veto on a bill that extends the payroll tax and unemployment insurance, because of Keystone is included.

It would be an interesting way to end the year, with Obama cornering Republicans on raising taxes just as 2012 rolls in.

Read full story · Comments { 21 }

Keystone Pipeline Allies ‘Jobs for the 99′ Occupy Strategy

Let’s start here, Keystone XL Oil Pipeline: A Symbolic Struggle Steeped In Fuzzy Math, which leads us to a Cornell study. Here’s a snippet:

The battle is said to be about jobs vs. the environment, but it’s really about Republicans like the Koch Bros. selling the State Dept. and Pres. Obama a bill of goods Keystone can’t back up.

So now the Occupy movement is being occupied by the Keystone Pipeline proponents, which include the AFL-CIO led by Richard Trumka. “Jobsforthe99″ is a pro-Keystone website. It trumpets an article from Richard Blackwell that is linked by Lucianne Goldberg, a right winger (some of you may remember her from Linda Tripp).

Huffington Post has a piece up on Keystone today.

There’s a “surround the White House” rally on November 6th trying to stop the approval of Keystone.

Jane Hamsher has an unintentionally hilarious post on Firedoglake, explaining that advertising policy is quite different from editorial. Keystone proponents are occupying her site via advertising that no business person should refuse.

Young people believe the environment matters. We need more of these individuals to get involved in politics, because the current crew is clueless.

Read full story · Comments { 3 }

What Got Your Attention Today?



Mr. Christie has to know that the minute he changes his mind the blush will go off his New Jersey… er… whatever. See the Daily Caller for proof.

The Solyndra imbroglio didn’t keep the Obama administration from offering more clean energy loan guarantees.

Energy Department approves $1 billion in solar energy loan guarantees

DOE announced a $737 million loan guarantee to help finance construction of the Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project, a 110-megawatt solar-power-generating facility in Nye County, Nev. The project is sponsored by Tonopah Solar, a subsidiary of California-based SolarReserve.

The Energy Department said the project will result in 600 construction jobs and 45 permanent jobs.

“If we want to be a player in the global clean energy race, we must continue to invest in innovative technologies that enable commercial-scale deployment of clean, renewable power like solar,” Energy Secretary Steven Chu said in a news release. “Solar generation facilities, like the Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project, help supply energy to local utilities and create hundreds of good, American clean energy jobs.”

What we really need is a president with vision and a Congress who takes clean energy seriously. We have neither.

So, what got your attention today? This is interesting.

Read full story · Comments { 4 }

The Meaning of ‘Special Relationship’: Israel vs. Saudi Arabia

Incoming from Arabia.

From Turki al-Faisal:

The United States must support the Palestinian bid for statehood at the United Nations this month or risk losing the little credibility it has in the Arab world. If it does not, American influence will decline further, Israeli security will be undermined and Iran will be empowered, increasing the chances of another war in the region.

Moreover, Saudi Arabia would no longer be able to cooperate with America in the same way it historically has. With most of the Arab world in upheaval, the “special relationship” between Saudi Arabia and the United States would increasingly be seen as toxic by the vast majority of Arabs and Muslims, who demand justice for the Palestinian people.

Which “special relationship” is more special?

Strategic interests abound, domestic politics prominently weighing down the inevitable awkwardness and the predictable conclusion.

Read full story · Comments { 0 }

Team Obama Yearns to Recapture 2008 ‘Spirit’

He is frustrated — particularly at Republicans on Capitol Hill, but also at some of his own aides, according to people who have spoken to him recently — that he has been unable to rise above the morass of Washington and recapture the spirit that helped him win election. – Jeff Zeleny

Pres. Obama’s “job speech” isn’t going to be a “jobs speech” at all. It’s a competing rhetorical gambit in a week where Republicans are debating who should take him on in 2012. Zeleny proves it by one line he wrote today. Team Obama wants to “recapture the spirit that helped him win election.”

Could anything be more gauzy, less tangible, void of purpose, while also revealing the central lack of vision element of Obama’s presidency?

Segue to one line in Bloomberg’s report on Obama’s so called “jobs speech”: Almost half the stimulus would come from tax cuts…

Team Obama will never capture the 2008 “spirit” that elected Barack Obama, because people now know it was predicated on a marketing myth. People now know there was nothing behind the “spirit” but emotions tied to fan politics, which Obama can only hope will turn to practical “lesser of two evils” voting once the Republicans have a nominee.

Sure people still like the guy, but the question, Is this all there is?, has now been answered unequivocally.

Oh, and promises won’t work anymore, because Pres. Obama’s gone one to many times to the tool-less word workshop.

Zeleny gets the coveted White House access, but the quote he gets from David Axelrod is one for the books:

“If this is just a referendum on economic conditions, then any incumbent is going to struggle with that, but it’s not just that. It’s a contest about what to do about it,” said David Axelrod, the chief strategist to the president’s re-election campaign. “I’d be more worried if I saw some compelling new argument for how to lead the country, but these guys are carrying the same old water.”

Speaking of “same old water,” let’s consider what Politico calls the “two central measures” to be included in Obama’s “jobs package.”

The two central measures in the Obama jobs package are expected to be a one-year extension of the payroll tax cut and an extension of expiring jobless benefits, according to the AP. Those two initiatives would total around $170 billion.

These two initiatives are the very definition of “same old water,” even though they’re both needed and important. David Dayen has more.

What’s new in Obama’s “jobs package”? A “public works projects will be included, but the AP reports that this will be less than $50 billion of the package.” I guess that’s something, but get out the crayon labeled “puny” to color me unimpressed.

Woven into this discussion is the little mentioned “deficit reduction” side of the package. Shorter: tinkering with some part of entitlements. See Ezra Klein:

Getting less attention in the media is the follow-up speech the White House is planning, which will lay out a specific deficit-reduction agenda that not only meets the $1.5 trillion goal of the “supercommittee,” but exceeds it and pays for the new jobs spending. These proposals will look quite similar to the grand bargain the White House offered Speaker John Boehner, and liberal groups are grimly preparing for the administration to call for raising the Medicare eligibility age.

Whatever “spirit” Team Obama is trying to recapture isn’t going to be done by doing paltry things being floated in the media, while Bill Daley negotiates with Obama’s corporate friends to gut the EPA, as candidate Obama panders to labor and his Democratic base as he moves to change entitlements, all of which is about appeasing Independents int he hopes of being reelected while standing for absolutely nothing.

Read full story · Comments { 22 }

We’ve Got Power


Streaming live video by Ustream

…and we’re back.

I must say I did enjoy looking at fashion magazines with a flashlight last night, though since I’m a creature of the 21st century having power is preferred. (The flip side of my reading life, which right now is No Ordinary Time, reminding me about when Democrats were Democrats.)

Seems fitting to offer an interview with Al Gore, though what he said put the Daily Caller into hyper crankiness. They also didn’t like Gore taking on Rick Perry.

This is the last week of summer before recess, so it’s a kick back week around here.

The floor is yours. Happy power Monday.

Read full story · Comments { 7 }

Two Parties = Too Few Choices, Part V

Joyce L. Arnold: Liberal, lesbian, Independent, equality activist, writer.

“Ask not how evil we are. Ask how evil the other party is!” Vastleft

That “Kennedyeseque” (as Vastleft terms it) phrase sums things up, in terms of what the Two Party Front for the Oligarchy likes to see happening. It’s, “Look! Over there! Scary Barack Obama!” Or, “Look! Over there! Scary Rick Perry!” Or Bachmann, or whoever. Fear is a key tactic in maintaining the Duopoly. As I’m working to point out through this “Two Parties” series, there are multiple efforts challenging the two party system, from within and without, from the philosophical to protests.

BlueLyon asked in a recent blog post, “How Do You Know? Or, Critical Thinking is Hard.

The problem isn’t that we aren’t in the street, or that the Tea Party is. The problem isn’t merely with the people we’ve put into office. The problem is that too few of us engage in critical thinking … . We don’t examine the candidates who stand before us … .

Being “in the streets” is an important piece of holding Electeds accountable. So is asking “How do I know?”, how do I arrive at my conclusions. Reading through material at the links I’ve provided (at the end), it’s clear a great deal of thought and action are going into how our monetarily entrenched system can be challenged.

A single issue focus probably won’t “grow” a party, but it can be a part of the process toward political change. Right now, in DC, a small group of people is using a vintage protest action, the sit-in. I think the discussions and analyses regarding our election and political system are crucial. So are actions. And sometimes I think the “action” part gets lost in all the words.

At Huffington Post, “TransCanada Pipeline Protesters: Who They Are, Why They Came”:

The debate over the Keystone XL oil pipeline reached a fever pitch this week as activists led by author and environmentalist Bill McKibben called on Barack Obama to deny presidential approval to the TransCanada project, which would stretch from tar sands in Canada to oil refineries in south Texas. Tuesday marked the fifth day of protests as well as the arrival of dozens of Gulf Coast residents to sit-ins before the White House.

The protests, slated to run through Sept. 3, have drawn a geographically diverse group of activists from as far away as California and Montana. As of Wednesday morning, 275 had been arrested by the U.S. Park Police. Hundreds more are on their way to Washington.

Now, “hundreds” isn’t the kind of thing that usually gets much media, or political, attention. A part of the political reform and create process is making ways for people like those protesting to be heard, in spite of ties between the MSM, the DC Elite, and the corporations who pay most of them.

‘Our Gulf Coast is very fragile … . We can’t go back and repair it … once they destroy it,’ said Paul Nelson, a commercial fisherman from Alabama. …

Other activists came to Washington to protest what they describe as the devastating health effects of oil refining and processing in Gulf Coast communities. … Bryan Parras, co-founder of Texas Environmental Justice Advocacy Services (said) … ‘there was a study done that said if you live within two miles of the Houston ship channel, … you have a 50 percent higher chance of contracting childhood leukemia.’ …

According to event organizers, over 2000 people signed up to be a part of the protest, and while media attention is obviously helpful,

Protesters … are more concerned about getting the attention of the White House.

‘TransCanada … need(s) a presidential permit to build that pipeline across our border,’ Mike Tidwell, founder of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, told a crowd of protesters gathered at the White House on Monday, ‘and President Obama has the ability to say yes or no.’ …

Along with Bill McKibben, one of those arrested was Jane Hamsher. Check out the series of posts Hamsher has written. This is from August 22, ”Did Obama Order Tar Sands Protesters Jailed?”:

In negotiations with the police prior to the action that began on Saturday, the police were very clear that what would happen after people were arrested was the vast majority would get what’s called ‘post and forfeit,’ where you put up $100, get released from jail after several hours, and you don’t have to come back again. …

… Instead, after arresting the first day’s 70 people, they (police) decided to hold most of them, all those not from within a 25-mile radius of Washington, D.C., in jail until a Monday afternoon arraignment. …

Why did they do this? … Four separate police officers told organizers that it was explicitly to discourage other people from taking part in actions going forward.

One other example of how people are acting on their words. Via Alternet ”Nurses Union Calls for Nationwide Action September 1 to Rebuild Main Street”: (emphasis mine)

Main Street is where the damage has been done and is being felt most deeply; DC is where deals are cut to protect Wall Street with breath-taking regularity. …

So, on Thursday, September 1, the nurses of National Nurses United will gather in more than 60 communities from Maine to Texas, and Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Michigan, Florida, Illinois, California and beyond to call on the nation’s elected officials to chose to protect and repair Main Street and stop cow-towing to Wall Street. …

The Wall Street Transaction Tax is a sales tax on the stocks, bonds, debt and other trades carried out by the financial industry. That’s the place to start. …

Find an event near you, ask your elected officials to attend and insist that they pledge to be a part of healing Main Street, and then stay tuned as the nurses keep up the kind of pressure needed to hold those who pledge to keep their promises and those who do not to stand to account.

Just two examples of the kind of actions being taken, and of the people who take them, people who defy the “nobody is doing anything” and “you have no choice” judgments. Like critical thinking, actions are hard work. And take time.

Below are links to earlier posts in this series. The last one includes a complete list, to date, of the political and party reform efforts I’ve found. More to come. And I want to keep hearing from you. Among other things, what’s going on in your state, and, are you seeing coalitions developing?

Posts in this series:
Grading the Electoral College
Two Parties = Too Few Choices
Two Parties = Too Few Choices, Part II
Two Parties = Too Few Choices, Part III
Two Parties = Too Few Choices, Part IV

(Photo via WatchingFrogsBoil)

Read full story · Comments { 14 }

Obama, Jobs and Economic Uncertainty

President Barack Obama receives an economic briefing from Brian Deese, Deputy Director of the National Economic Council, in Chilmark, Mass., August 24, 2011. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

From Reuters:

The president is widely expected to repeat his calls for an extension of a payroll tax cut, push for patent reform and bilateral free trade deals, and suggest an infrastructure bank to upgrade the country’s roads, airports and other facilities.

Retrofitting schools with energy efficient technology would allow the government to directly hire for labor-intensive work and also give a boost to the clean energy sector that Obama has said could be an important U.S. economic motor.

Other measures being considered, according to economists who have advised the White House, include tax credits for firms hiring more workers, funds for local governments to hire teachers, and retraining help for the long-term unemployed. Steps to boost the ailing housing market are also under review.

Complicating the fall outlook, however, is an article circulating from the UK Telegraph with a heart-stopping headline that could change everything:

Read full story · Comments { 10 }

VA Earthquake Shuts Down North Anna Nuke Facility

**UDPATED**

Peach Liqueur bottle fell from 6' bar shelf, missed the cat by an inch & didn't break.

MSNBC is reporting the 5.9 earthquake that hit northern Virginia and across the east coast was the largest since 1897 and “released the equivalent energy of 10,676 tons of TNT.”

The North Anna plant lost off-site power.

Our birds began freaking out just minutes before it hit, so I knew something was up. It was a very respectable tremor that sent our kitties flying. It lasted more than a 10-count where we live.

Today is primary day in Virginia, so it will be interesting to see how this will impact it.

As a long-time former Southern California resident, I experienced the Northridge quake when I was living just down from Sunset Blvd, which was epic.

I’ll likely not see the beasts the rest of the day… Our classic champagne flutes survived.

UPDATE 2: The tweet of the day, via Howie Klein. Oh, I just can’t stop laughing…

UPDATE: NBC’s Robert Bozell said something interesting; that the harder environment on the east coast versus the softer ground on the west coast made the tremor travel further and wider.

Read full story · Comments { 17 }

Obama Administration to Assad: Time for You to Go

The Obama administration has been reluctant to call on Assad to step down because the next question would be what it plans to do about it. The recent experience in Libya, where similar calls from the United States and others have been ignored, has also led some to urge caution. As violence has increased in recent weeks, beginning with the military’s siege on the restive city of Hama and then spreading to other cities, the White House decided it was time to take the next step. Republican presidential candidatte (sic) Mitt Romney said today Obama should have acted sooner. – Obama Calls on Syria’s Assad to Step Down, Freezes Assets

Pres. Obama released a statement earlier today.

[...] As a part of that effort, my Administration is announcing unprecedented sanctions to deepen the financial isolation of the Assad regime and further disrupt its ability to finance a campaign of violence against the Syrian people. I have signed a new Executive Order requiring the immediate freeze of all assets of the Government of Syria subject to U.S. jurisdiction and prohibiting U.S. persons from engaging in any transaction involving the Government of Syria. This E.O. also bans U.S. imports of Syrian-origin petroleum or petroleum products; prohibits U.S. persons from having any dealings in or related to Syria’s petroleum or petroleum products; and prohibits U.S. persons from operating or investing in Syria. We expect today’s actions to be amplified by others. …

This comes as the backdrop of Afghanistan looks grim, Iraq remains volatile, while Pres. Obama’s power is at its lowest since his presidency began and thinking about becoming enmeshed further militarily makes most sane people nervous.

That would not count Rick Perry who comes from the yeehaw! neoconservative wing of the Republican Party.

This final decision to challenge Assad’s brutality has been a long time in the making, with Pres. Assad telling the U.N. secretary general just yesterday that the carnage had been halted, which was a lie.

Don’t look now, but the Middle East just got hotter.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Good morning. For months, the world has borne witness to the Asad regime’s contempt for its own people. In peaceful demonstrations across the nation, Syrians are demanding their universal human rights. The regime has answered their demands with empty promises and horrific violence, torturing opposition leaders, laying siege to cities, slaughtering thousands of unarmed civilians, including children.

The Asad government has now been condemned by countries in all parts of the world and can look only to Iran for support for its brutal and unjust crackdown.

This morning, President Obama called on Asad to step aside and announced the strongest set of sanctions to date targeting the Syrian Government. These sanctions include the energy sector to increase pressure on the regime. The transition to democracy in Syria has begun, and it’s time for Asad to get out of the way.

As President Obama said this morning, no outside power can or should impose on this transition. It is up to the Syrian people to choose their own leaders in a democratic system based on the rule of law and dedicated to protecting the rights of all citizens, regardless of ethnicity, religion, sect, or gender.

We understand the strong desire of the Syrian people that no foreign country should intervene in their struggle, and we respect their wishes. At the same time, we will do our part to support their aspirations for a Syria that is democratic, just, and inclusive. And we will stand up for their universal rights and dignity by pressuring the regime and Asad personally to get out of the way of this transition.

All along, as we have worked to expand the circle of global condemnation, we have backed up our words with actions. As I’ve repeatedly said, it does take both words and actions to produce results. Since the unrest began, we have imposed strong financial sanctions on Asad and dozens of his cronies. We have sanctioned the Commercial Bank of Syria for supporting the regime’s illicit nuclear proliferation activities. And we have led multilateral efforts to isolate the regime, from keeping them off the Human Rights Council, to achieving a strong presidential statement of condemnation at the UN Security Council.

The steps that President Obama announced this morning will further tighten the circle of isolation around the regime. His executive order immediately freezes all assets of the Government of Syria that are subject to American jurisdiction and prohibits American citizens from engaging in any transactions with the Government of Syria or investing in that country. These actions strike at the heart of the regime by banning American imports of Syrian petroleum and petroleum products and prohibiting Americans from dealing in these products.

And as we increase pressure on the Asad regime to disrupt its ability to finance its campaign of violence, we will take steps to mitigate any unintended effects of the sanctions on the Syrian people. We will also continue to work with the international community, because if the Syrian people are to achieve their goals, other nations will have to provide support and take actions as well.

In just the past two weeks, many of Syria’s own neighbors and partners in the region have joined the chorus of condemnation. We expect that they and other members of the international community will amplify the steps we are taking both through their words and their actions.

We are heartened that, later today, the UN Security Council will meet again to discuss this ongoing threat to international peace and stability. We are also working to schedule a special session of the United Nations Human Rights Council that will examine the regime’s widespread abuses. Earlier this week, I explained how the United States has been engaged in a relentless and systematic effort with the international community, pursuing a set of actions and statements that make crystal clear where we all stand, and generating broader and deeper pressure on the Asad regime.

The people of Syria deserve a government that respects their dignity, protects their rights, and lives up to their aspirations. Asad is standing in their way. For the sake of the Syrian people, the time has come for him to step aside and leave this transition to the Syrians themselves, and that is what we will continue to work to achieve.

Thank you all very much.

Read full story · Comments { 1 }

Matt Damon on Teachers

Pres. Obama has already telegraphed that he’s ready to work with Republicans, as the Administration prepares to privatize education, while changing the public school system under the mantel of “reform.”

Matt Damon played offense recently and he effusively heaped praise on the teachers who don’t get paid enough and take way too much grief for what they are paid.

But this is when Austerity’s grip, the need for more and better schools, and partnerships with businesses wanting to help offer more options tend to make some people simply ask Why not?

It’s not about qualified teachers with experience getting a living wage and some control over the task they’ve been asked to do.

Over to you.. …

Read full story · Comments { 9 }

Pres. Obama’s News Conference

**UPDATED**

Tweeting/retweeting Pres. Obama’s news conference, with select tweets below:

Taylor Marsh: “It weighs on you,” circumstances hitting Americans. Then ode to Iowa, “put aside the expedience of short-term politics” to get it done. End

Taylor Marsh: Obama: “I’ve been doing bin Laden, the Greek crisis.” Clearly ticked off about charges he’s not leading. #thinskin (This was a hit on Congress being on break.)

Taylor Marsh: Obama: I met with the leaders & at some point they’ve got to do their jobs. “They need to do their jobs. That’s why they’re called leaders.”

Matt Stoller: “Balanced approach” versus “Step up and get this done” #ClicheFight

Peter Daou: Guess which topic never comes up in these press conferences: the one that directly imperils our existence #climate #warming

Taylor Marsh: @MPOTheHill Nice try, but no, it’s not about interrupting econ message. It’s about 2012 message to voters he’s going to need in swing states (Note: Talking about Obama not being willing to make news on gay marriage today.)

Andrea Mitchell: No one’s asked Obama whether Kabul attack signals how hard it is to stop Taliban from pulling off inside jobs. Affect on drawdown?

Taylor Marsh: MSNBC crawler under Obama: “61% disapprove of how Pres Obama has handled federal budget deficit (from McClatchy-Marist)” He’s lost pr war.

Taylor Marsh: This is NOT helpful to progressives & Democrats, with Obama once again lost in word fogs with absolutely no econ message you can grasp.

Jonah Goldberg: Breaking: Mel Tormé called from heaven. Worried Obama trying to steal “velvet fog” nickname during this press conference.

Taylor Marsh: Obama calls Libya Was Powers Act “fuss” over politics, but it’s obvious his ego is in a bunch over being challenged. Thin skin prevails.

David Corn: BREAKING: GOP Accuses Obama of Waging Class War on Corp. Jet Owners. #waitforit #corpjetownersaresmallbusinesses

Taylor Marsh: @chucktodd asks on Libya, debt limit & gays. “Noise about process” on Libya leads into hyperbolic nonsense about Gadhafi’s killing history

Taylor Marsh: Obama is making revenue argument ridiculous by saying corp. jets, instead of making case for taxes so gov. can function for the people.

Taylor Marsh: Obama still doesn’t get it. Dems giving in on entitlements w/o GOP giving on taxes gives them the edge. Blinking first never ever works.

TM: Get rid of tax breaks for millionaires & billionaires, corporate jet owners, oil & gas, Obama’s pitch.

Chuck Todd: Interesting opening statement from POTUS focusing on Congress. Phrase “pending before Congress right now” uttered multiple Xs already

TM: “Right now” begins Obama’s pointing the finger at Congress.

Read full story · Comments { 8 }

Al Gore Chides Obama to Use Bully Pulpit on Climate Change

Poor Al.

He wants so badly to help Pres. Barack Obama find his inner presidential activist on behalf of important international policy. But while he scolds him, Mr. Gore also neuters his effectiveness by giving Pres. Obama power over him and the message he’s desperate to drill home.

The Joplin tornado proved how badly a leader is needed. Last week my brother Larry traveled to Joplin, Mo. where he was born. There’d never been such a catastrophe like the tornado that recently decimated this quaint mining town. We’d talked and I’d hoped he’d make the trip once they were letting people in again. He wanted to see the houses he grew up and lived in, to see if they were still standing, along with the hospital where he was born, which took direct hits. All 3 houses of Larry’s childhood, grandma and grandpa’s too, made it through the tornado, his junior high school did not. But seeing Joplin was a stunning trip for him, even as current residents work their way back.

This is part of what our weather has become. The Rush Limbaugh flat earth crowd is oblivious, because they’re still moored in the 19th century, ignoring science, even evolution, not taking the stewardship of our planet seriously.

The problem remains that Obama’s too scared he’ll alienate some far flung Blue Dog or Independent or discover an extinct liberal Republican that might vote for him in North Carolina that he won’t say what’s needed to be said. He’s been in this state for a long time.

It’s time for Mr. Gore to face that Pres. Obama hasn’t been able to find the courage or vision to inspire Americans to join together for any cause and today people wouldn’t listen if he did.

Even with Obama’s incredible power he once had coming into office, he couldn’t get a Democratic Congress to join together to pass important Democratic legislation, with even the health care bill a mish-mash of private insurance benefits and giveaways to Big Phrma. Why anyone thinks at this point he’s going to rally people behind a cause is beyond me.

But because we’re in a desperate climate situation, including losing our oceans, Mr. Gore is driven to try. From Gore’s Rolling Stone article:

[...] But in spite of these and other achievements, President Obama has thus far failed to use the bully pulpit to make the case for bold action on climate change. After successfully passing his green stimulus package, he did nothing to defend it when Congress decimated its funding. After the House passed cap and trade, he did little to make passage in the Senate a priority. Senate advocates — including one Republican — felt abandoned when the president made concessions to oil and coal companies without asking for anything in return. He has also called for a massive expansion of oil drilling in the United States, apparently in an effort to defuse criticism from those who argue speciously that “drill, baby, drill” is the answer to our growing dependence on foreign oil.

[...] … Ultimately, however, the only way to address the climate crisis will be with a global agreement that in one way or another puts a price on carbon. And whatever approach is eventually chosen, the U.S. simply must provide leadership by changing our own policy.

Yet without presidential leadership that focuses intensely on making the public aware of the reality we face, nothing will change. The real power of any president, as Richard Neustadt wrote, is “the power to persuade.” Yet President Obama has never presented to the American people the magnitude of the climate crisis. He has simply not made the case for action. He has not defended the science against the ongoing, withering and dishonest attacks. Nor has he provided a presidential venue for the scientific community — including our own National Academy — to bring the reality of the science before the public.

Here is the core of it: we are destroying the climate balance that is essential to the survival of our civilization. This is not a distant or abstract threat; it is happening now. The United States is the only nation that can rally a global effort to save our future. And the president is the only person who can rally the United States.

Many political advisers assume that a president has to deal with the world of politics as he finds it, and that it is unwise to risk political capital on an effort to actually lead the country toward a new understanding of the real threats and real opportunities we face. Concentrate on the politics of re-election, they say. Don’t take chances.

All that might be completely understandable and make perfect sense in a world where the climate crisis wasn’t “real.” Those of us who support and admire President Obama understand how difficult the politics of this issue are in the context of the massive opposition to doing anything at all — or even to recognizing that there is a crisis. And assuming that the Republicans come to their senses and avoid nominating a clown, his re-election is likely to involve a hard-fought battle with high stakes for the country. All of his supporters understand that it would be self-defeating to weaken Obama and heighten the risk of another step backward. Even writing an article like this one carries risks; opponents of the president will excerpt the criticism and strip it of context.

But in this case, the President has reality on his side. The scientific consensus is far stronger today than at any time in the past. Here is the truth: The Earth is round; Saddam Hussein did not attack us on 9/11; Elvis is dead; Obama was born in the United States; and the climate crisis is real. It is time to act. [...]

What Mr. Gore ignores is that whatever capital Pres. Obama once had he has squandered. There isn’t enough hope to believe he can change to lead on climate change. Even if Obama wins reelection, his second term won’t be about Democratic change, but he will likely go for historic accomplishments like “dealing with entitlements.”

It might be hard for people to understand what I’m now about to write. But given Pres. Obama’s failure to use the presidential bully pulpit for anything but to help himself, whether through issues that serve his long-term interests or political future, on climate change, leadership may now have to come from an unlikely source.

Could climate change be the Republicans’ Nixon to China moment if they get into office in 2012? I’m not betting on it, that’s for sure, because Republicans today are a rag tag lot of miserable austerity hacks.

But reading Mr. Gore write this incredible statement reveals the problem with the Democratic establishment, including the best and brightest:

All of his supporters understand that it would be self-defeating to weaken Obama and heighten the risk of another step backward.

The Democratic Party will continue to be ineffectual, weak and a party of corporate interests, including on policy, if they believe pleading to a president who knows he won’t face consequences for his betrayals will change the equation.

At some point, Democrats and progressives are going to have to decide what’s more important, one man and winning or the principles on which their party once stood.

The men backing Jon Huntsman have decided for the sake of the future they think his candidacy is worth standing behind, because it might pave the way for something amazing to happen, like the huge fundraising on his first day out. Maybe they’ll get lucky in the face of such an uninspiring GOP field, but they simply know they can’t tolerate what’s being stood up in the name of Reagan’s party.

Too bad Democrats and progressives don’t feel the same way about F.D.R.’s party.

Al Gore’s piece is a tortured plea, as filled with angst as the entire progressive movement is when it comes to Barack Obama. Lecturing this man won’t change him.

Ask any woman who goes to work trying to change a man, falling in love with the person she thinks he is or could be instead of the man he actually is. It always ends badly, either in breakup or divorce, unless she’s stupid and lazy enough to choose to live with much less than she deserves.

The planet doesn’t stand a chance against these odds.

Read full story · Comments { 17 }

Norquist Loses as Ethanol Subsidies Go Down **UPDATED**

The Senate voted 73-27 Thursday to kill a major tax break that benefits the ethanol industry, handing a political win to a bipartisan group of lawmakers that call the incentive needless and expensive.

 – Senate kills off ethanol tax credits in possible break with tax pledge

OMG. OMG! Republicans broke their “tax pledge,” as 33 of them joined 38 Democrats to vote ethanol subsidies down.

Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), Norquist’s group, just took a hit and that’s very good news.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Read full story · Comments { 4 }

A Second Term for the Sake of It

Norquist might have to take a hard line and pretend he’s appalled to see it crossed, but in focusing everyone on that line, he’s effectively distracting them from how far the goalposts have been moved. Instead of revenues being an assumed part of a deficit deal, with the only question being how much of the deal they make up, the question has become whether Republicans will accept any revenues at all in the deficit deal. Including any new revenues at all has been framed as a major concession for the Republicans, which means it’s easier for Republicans to include far less revenue in total. And no matter how you look at it, that’s a win for Grover Norquist.Wonkbook: Grover Norquist’s small loss and big win

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Well, that was a weird exchange with Ann Curry that explains a lot.

The most amazing thing about the Republican debate this week was that there were no ideas on the economy or jobs. It’s the most infuriating thing about the era of austerity in which we live. Pres. Obama, having bought into the same thing a long time ago, except when it comes to dispensing our military in other countries, has now relegated the Democratic Party to the same status as the GOP, a tax-cutting priority party.

Meanwhile, The American people and the Progressive Caucus are exercised about jobs for good reasons. From Huffington Post:

Progressive Democrats are launching a tour to call for good jobs for the working and middle classes, putting pressure on House Republicans and President Barack Obama to push for more job measures.

“Let’s get mad,” Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) said at a press conference. “Let’s tell the man that we love in the White House to get off of his butt and start supporting some legislature for jobs. … He’s the best speaker in the world, and now we want some action.”

But the Democrats saved their harshest words for House Republicans, whom Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.) called “spineless” in their support for tax cuts and subsidies.

It would be nice if progressive legislators also remembered that it was Pres. Obama who touted tax cut last year, while ignoring tax hikes for mil-billionaires, but that would require mutiny.

I just don’t get any sense that Pres. Obama is all that excited about taking on the challenge, except as a campaign theme or as some panel exercise. If he was he would.

Pres. Obama says he’s got enough energy to keep doing the work he’s doing, but without a vision for what his presidency means I’m not sure that’s good enough. It’s striking that he talks about finishing the work he started in 2009, mentioning energy and education, when the word j-o-b-s should be the first word out of his mouth.

Asked about his family’s reaction to his wanting another term, Obama said: “Michelle and the kids are wonderful in that if I said, `You know, guys, I want to do something different,’ They’d be fine. They’re not invested in daddy being president or my husband being president.” – Obama: My family would be fine with just 1 term

The idea here is that Barack Obama would be fine with one term, something that he’s implied before. Perhaps that’s because he’s floating along letting events pull him, rather than having a driving ideological passion and purpose that inspires him to begin an infrastructure project that would revitalize our country, whether it’s roads and bridges, airports, with the manifested results also putting people back to work.

Negotiator is one role he plays, but Pres. Obama’s presidency long ago turned into administrating through the events unfolding. There isn’t a passionate purpose to his presidency that I can sense, feel or hear. Americans like Pres. Obama, with his family a remarkable model. But the celebrity persona that helped land him in the White House hasn’t inspired him to change into a man on any mission.

There is no great vision to Barack Obama’s presidency and everybody knows it. The recent jaw-boning flurry is campaign talk without a plan. There’s no driving dream, no sense of where he wants to take the country. Any direction was better than where George W. Bush was taking the country, but now there is a listlessness to the American journey Pres. Obama’s supposed to be leading.

The thrill is also gone in watching Pres. Obama and I’m not sure revving up his trademark rhetoric will alter this dynamic. He’s certainly still a formidable candidate, but if a Republican challenger with a vision for America finally gets around to offering one people will listen.

Americans are desperate.

Obama also says he wants to finish what he started, but somehow it simply sounds like something a one-term president says, because he wants another. George H.W. Bush showed the same kind of nonchalance to the office of the presidency before Bill Clinton came out of nowhere to knock the dreams of a fourth Reagan legacy tour off the calendar.

The economy’s the biggest reason Pres. Obama could lose his job. He could keep it if the current Republican crew continues what they revved up last night: attacks with no ideas, coupled with tax cuts. Another reason Obama could lose is that he isn’t making a case in policy, passion or in vision for why he deserves to keep it.

Read full story · Comments { 39 }