TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Tag Archives | Hezbollah

ISRAEL – LEBANON: Bush Administration Aided Israel

ISRAEL – LEBANON: Bush Administration Aided Israel –updated–

This headline should come as no surprise to anyone.

According to Seymour Hersh, who was interviewed on CNN today, the Bush administration
was actively involved in Israel's attempt to obliterate Hezbollah, which missed
the mark by a mile
. Hersh's article comes out tomorrow. Below is the video of
Hersh on CNN
. Hersh talks about the taking of Israeli soldiers as a “pretext” for Israel to act. Cheney's office surfaces again, according to Hersh, as they see the Israel attack on Hezbollah as a “prototype” for what the Bush administration wants to do in Iran.

VIEW the VIDEO



… The Bush Administration, however, was closely involved in the planning
of Israel’s retaliatory attacks. President Bush and Vice-President Dick
Cheney were convinced, current and former intelligence and diplomatic officials
told me, that a successful Israeli Air Force bombing campaign against Hezbollah’s
heavily fortified underground-missile and command-and-control complexes in
Lebanon could ease Israel’s security concerns and also serve as a prelude
to a potential American preëmptive attack to destroy Iran’s nuclear
installations, some of which are also buried deep underground.

Israeli military and intelligence experts I spoke to emphasized that the
country’s immediate security issues were reason enough to confront Hezbollah,
regardless of what the Bush Administration wanted. Shabtai Shavit, a national-security
adviser to the Knesset who headed the Mossad, Israel’s foreign-intelligence
service, from 1989 to 1996, told me, “We do what we think is best for
us, and if it happens to meet America’s requirements, that’s just
part of a relationship between two friends. Hezbollah is armed to the teeth
and trained in the most advanced technology of guerrilla warfare. It was just
a matter of time. We had to address it.” …

(snip)

The Western diplomat told me his embassy believes that Abrams has emerged as a key policymaker on Iran, and on the current Hezbollah-Israeli crisis, and that Rice’s role has been relatively diminished. Rice did not want to make her most recent diplomatic trip to the Middle East, the diplomat said. “She only wanted to go if she thought there was a real chance to get a ceasefire.” …

WATCHING
LEBANON

Washington’s interests in Israel’s war.

Oh, and I want to add some other thoughts… If you think this latest U.N. resolution will disarm Hezbollah, then you're likely part of the crowd that believed in U.N. Resolution 1559. A Chapter 6 U.N. resolution is better than nothing, because so many innocent people are dying, but it comes with no military teeth. However, the real bottom line is that without the Lebanese government getting help from the entire international community, which depends on America leadership and a change of course that actually puts us talking with Iran and especially Syria, the bloodletting between Hezbollah and Israel won't stop for long. Any way you cut it, Israel, Bush and the entire AIPAC neocon community, along with Christians United for Israel, lost this war and they lost it badly.

UPDATE (12:12 p.m.): The neocon wingnuts are circling the wagons because of rumors — they are just rumors, mind you — that Lebanon is about to fall. A Lebanese cabinet meeting was postponed at the last minute, thus bringing on wild speculation. Right-wingers are trying to get the story out there ahead of any potential disaster of Siniora's government falling, because they can't afford the reality taking hold. That reality is that Israel and President Bush would be responsible for Lebanon falling, because they put a far flung plan to demolish Hezbollah ahead of Lebanon and the people of that country. Neocon wet dreams of taking out Hezbollah in airstrikes were put above of keeping Siniora's government strong. The people were second, whose hope relied completely on Siniora's government surviving Olmert's catastrophic assaults on Lebanon, which was backed wholeheartedly by President Bush. Time will tell if Siniora's government can hold on, but there is no doubt that the Lebanonese government has been significantly weakened by Olmert's assaults, and Bush's hands off diplomatic policies.

UPDATE (1:30 p.m.): Stirling Newberry on The Fall of the Israeli Empire.

UPDATE (3:30 p.m.) Ian Welsh talks about The Twilight of the Decapitation Military, dealing with Israel's reality, which had their airforce failing miserably against a “light infantry unit,” as Ian phrases it.

Read full story · Comments are closed

ISRAEL – LEBANON: Between a Rocket and a Resignation

UPDATE (8.12.06, 10:20 a.m.): Israeli troops reach the Litani River. And in the don't hold your breath department… as in the Israelis won't withdraw just yet.

The Litani River is shown in red.


UPDATE (7:11 p.m.): Cue Bibi, he's (no doubt) waiting in the wings.


By the time you read this post, who knows what could have happened between
Israel and Lebanon,
but let's begin.

Right now, Israel has to save face by showing “superiority on the ground,”
as former General Wesley Clark said this morning on Fox.

Russia has a resolution that demands a 72-hour humanitarian ceasefire.

France is going to put forth their own draft U.N. resolution at 3:00 p.m./EDT,
minus the Chapter 7 language that Israel wants, which would allow for military
action. It looks like they'll get Chapter 6 language instead, which does not
authorize force or allow it to fire on Hezbollah, even if fired upon. Also,
Fox just reported that Shaaba
Farms
is included in the current draft resolution, which is a deal breaker
for Israel.

Bolton will be there to push back for Bush.

Meanwhile, the Lebanese army is being sent to southern Lebanon.

However, one thing seems certain. Prime Minister Olmert needs a significant
military victory on the ground or he is finished. Haaretz agrees. So, Israel's
ground offensive into Lebanon has begun. I think it's another bonehead play; so does Billmon.


… However, one thing should be clear: If Olmert runs away now from the
war he initiated, he will not be able to remain prime minister for even one
more day. Chutzpah has its limits. You cannot lead an entire nation to war
promising victory, produce humiliating defeat and remain in power. You cannot
bury 120 Israelis in cemeteries, keep a million Israelis in shelters for a
month, wear down deterrent power, bring the next war very close, and then
say – oops, I made a mistake. That was not the intention. Pass me a cigar,
please.

There is no mistake Ehud Olmert did not make this past month. He went to
war hastily, without properly gauging the outcome. He blindly followed the
military without asking the necessary questions. He mistakenly gambled on
air operations, was strangely late with the ground operation, and failed to
implement the army's original plan, much more daring and sophisticated than
that which was implemented. And after arrogantly and hastily bursting into
war, Olmert managed it hesitantly, unfocused and limp. He neglected the home
front and abandoned the residents of the north. He also failed shamefully
on the diplomatic front. …

Olmert
cannot remain in the prime minister's office

Negotiations continue, but, as far as I see it, there's no real passion for
a ceasefire due to the fact that Olmert has led Israel into an embarrassing,
possibly politically devastating, military situation that he blew from the beginning.
Now operation save face is in its most critical phase. The IDF has got to push
back hard against Hezbollah.

One thing I did hear this morning is that Hezbollah has fired very few rockets
into Israel today. What that means only time will tell.

Via Stratfor


Israel's fight against Hezbollah is not going particularly well at the moment.
As such, sentiment in Israel is beginning to turn against the government of
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. The person who has the most to gain from the government's
problems — Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu — has remained strangely silent.
While the Olmert government will probably still launch a major ground offensive
toward the Litani River and into the Bekaa Valley, Netanyahu remains in the
background, ready to take advantage of the conflict's end — whether that
ending is a success or failure. … – compliments
Sean-Paul

developing… but the humanitarian crisis continues, as Bill Kristol spins the best he can on Fox, against any U.N. action at all. Bombs away, Israel, seems to be the conservative line. Too bad for all the Lebanese, not to mention the long-term reality for a two-state solution. Idiots, all.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Sunny Saturday with the Middle East at War

Sunny Saturday with the Middle East at War –updated

UPDATE (11:00 a.m.): The headline is now U.S., France OK U.N. Mideast truce pact. I can't wait to hear the cluck-cluck-cluck of Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity. The French saved our bacon, and Israel's too on this one. …Let me also add that the idea of disarming Hezbollah is one thing, but to make this work the Hezbollah fighters need to be integrated into the Lebanese army, no easy task. Nothing else will work, because they must have a stake in the “new” Lebanon, which will also make the Siniora gov. stronger. As for Nasrallah, he isn't going anywhere. Oh, and one more thing, AMEN! TO THIS.



The draft, obtained by The Associated Press, “calls for a full cessation of hostilities based upon, in particular, the immediate cessation by Hezbollah of all attacks and the immediate cessation by Israel of all offensive military operations.”

(snip)

One crucial element is an arms embargo that would block any entity except the Lebanese government from buying weapons.

That is presumably meant to block the sale of arms to Hezbollah from Iran and Syria, believed to be the militia's main suppliers.

Other principles spelled out in the resolution include the disarmament of Hezbollah; the creation of a buffer zone from the U.N.-demarcated border between Israel and Lebanon north to the Litani River; and the delineation of Lebanon's borders, especially in the disputed Chebaa Farms area. … AP

UPDATE II (1:30 p.m.): I've been going through some Stratfor information, via Sean-Paul, and came upon something very interesting. As an fyi, all power has been knocked out in the Kiraoun area at the southern end of the Bekaa Valley, but there's more. Cue show tunes: “Something's Comin'.”



… A week ago, Israeli foot patrols in Lebanon were spotted using llamas, an especially quiet beast of burden that can go several days without eating while carrying about as much weight as one Israeli soldier can carry. This, combined with an airstrike on a power station supplying an area of the southern Bekaa Valley, signals Israel is about to make a significant move.

At first glance, it appears like an odd role-reversal when Israeli reconnaissance units are leading pack animals into battle while Hezbollah fighters are wielding modern anti-tank weapons. But as U.S. special operations forces calling in airstrikes from horseback in Afghanistan showed, mountain and fourth-generation warfare present new challenges that must be met on the ground. …

Israelis hit Lebanese Christian areas.



A strange thing happened on the way to Senator Chris Dodd helping his friend
Joe Lieberman yesterday. Appearing on “Hardball,” Dodd said he delayed
his trip to Iraq to help Joe save his flailing campaign. However, in the interview,
Dodd seemed more interested in saying the war was a disaster and we should pull
out now, than talking about Joe Lieberman. It was telling, especially when Dodd repeated over again that he disagreed with Lieberman on Iraq. Message sent
and received, Mr. Dodd, our message to you, that is.

Meanwhile, our Middle East policy is in shambles and even the RNC
is running from Bush. It's bad, people. But Paris all
over again?
You remember the Paris peace talks to settle Vietnam, right?
Yeah, those talks. Same type of screw up, different war. But now even Israel is spinning from the realization that they may be faced with yet another Lebanese quagmire (h/t Billmon).

But if you want screw
ups, listen to this out of Iraq.


Is there any way to read this other than that some significant portion of
the Iraqi media which emerged after Saddam's fall was in fact a fully funded
and operational Psychological Operations campaign? If that's the case, then
this would seem to quite a revelation. Which newspapers, radios and TV stations
were actually PSYOP operations, one might want to know. While I'd imagine
that most enterprising journalists are either in Lebanon or on vacation, this
still might be worth somebody following up on.

Information
Operations: What Went Wrong?

The pdf on the Army's
IO
is an incredible read. Phrases like “a commander must
visualize the information environment”
pepper the report. It will
be years before we understand and weigh what we actually asked of our soldiers
in Iraq opposed to the duties they were actually trained to execute. Army leaders
found IO a “nebulous” concept. Well, no kidding. The U.S. Information
Operations in Iraq was nothing less than a total and complete fiasco. But remember
when we shut down Sadr's newspaper, which began the hell? We not only shut him
down, but we started up a huge mechanism that was devoted to PSYOPS, which isn't all that shocking, however none of it worked, or when it did it worked poorly. Read the report, but have a tall cold one handy.

Fast forward… Via Huffington Post,
the picture accompanying this
article
just makes you want to scream. The text doesn't help either.

Israeli Prime Minister Olmert doing take no prisoner bombings in Lebanon while
we were barely hanging on in Iraq are not the actions of an ally. Taking into
account the civilian casualties the brutal barbarity is all the more stunning.
But it's Olmert's actions while Iraq was imploding that really ticks me off.
It's been very difficult for me to get my head around that one; especially with
Bush ignoring it like it doesn't matter. It's unfathomable. But now the Israelis are hitting the Christian areas of Lebanon.

Hezbollah's heinous terrorist acts in the past also doesn't excuse the slaughtering of
Lebanese civilians. It sure doesn't erase the reality that Hezbollah has seats
in the Lebanese government, won in a democratic election.

Memo to Bush and the conservatives: democracy is sometimes messy and unpredictable
(see Connecticut, though there hasn't been fisticuffs just yet).

But to hear our brave and valiant U.S. troops talk about Iraq, with no way
out for them, because our president would rather vacation in Crawford than hunker
down and find solutions for the imploding Middle East, well, dereliction of
duty about covers it. I honestly don't know how President Bush sleeps at night. That he's back in Crawford rubs salt in our soldiers wounds.


… “It's to the point of being irreconcilable; you know, we've found a
lot of bodies, entire villages have been cleared out, we get reports of entire
markets being gunned down – and if that's not a marker of a civil war, I don't
know what is,” said Ramon, 33, of San Antonio, Texas.

Driving back to his base, Johnson watched a long line of trucks and cars
go by, packed with families fleeing their homes with everything they could
carry: mattresses, clothes, furniture, and, in the back of some trucks, bricks
to build another home.

“Every morning that we head back to the patrol base, this is all we
see,” Johnson said. “These are probably people who got threatened
last night.”

In Taji, an area north of Baghdad, where the roads between Sunni and Shiite
villages have become killing fields, many soldiers said they saw little chance
that things would get better.

“I don't think there's any winning here. Victory for us is withdrawing,”
said Sgt. James Ellis, 25, of Chicago. “In this part of the world they
have been fighting for 3,000 years, and we're not going to fix it in three.”

Iraqi
civil war has already begun, U.S. troops say

Read full story · Comments are closed

ISRAEL – LEBANON: Baalbek Yields Little

ISRAEL – LEBANON: Baalbek Yields Little –updated–

Excuse me, but what were the Israeli's thinking on this one? Or was their intelligence
that bad? IDF is saying the hospital was a base for Hezbollah. No one has verified
this claim so far.

I also have to ask why Israel didn't send troops in from the start. If they had, Qana would might not have happened. It's disorganized chaos leading to a deal: Golan Heights going once, twice…

Hearing several TV news reports, as well as reading about it, is seems that
the Israelis went around 80 miles into Lebanon, just 7 miles away from Syria,
in the Bekaa Valley, to get a bunch of low level thugs.

Earlier reports said that there were signs of gunfire going into the hospital,
but none coming out of it. The image isn't good. Via Max Blumenthal (where I also got the graphic) comes a great article about the Middle East pr war.

It seems obvious that the Israelis were hoping (or had information) that high
level Hezbollah fighters were in the hospital.

However, Michael Ware of CNN, who is as good as they get on the ground, did
another report saying there was some evidence that gunfire came out of the hospital,
too. He's the only one I've found to be reporting this information. In addition,
Ware reported that civilians were killed as the Israelis made their way out
of Baalbek, with the article below counting the civilian death toll at around
13. Thankfully, no Israeli soldiers were killed.


None of those seized were high-ranking Hezbollah officials, however, as the
IDF had hoped. Halutz said Wednesday that the soldiers had not aimed to take
any individuals in particular, but rather to demonstrate that the IDF could
reach any part of Lebanon.

Hezbollah denied that any of its fighters had been captured, but Lebanese
security sources confirmed that the commandos had snatched five low-ranking
members of the guerilla group.

IDF commandos nab
five low-level Hezbollah men in Baalbek raid

Hussein Nasrallah (same name, but no relation to the Hezbollah leader), Hussein
al-Burji and Ahmed al-Ghotah were the militants captured. Reports claim that
the hard drives of the computers in the hospital have revealed good intelligence.
One can hope.

But you've got to ask yourself, why did the Israelis risk an 80 mile quick
incursion into deep Lebanon for these thugs? The outcome ending up a dangerous gamble for little pay off.
They certainly didn't do it for show, because what it illustrates isn't all
that good.

Meanwhile, Reuters is reporting that 750,000 Lebanese have been driven out
of their homes.

As for Hezbollah, they're now firing the Khaybar-1
or Fajar-5
(aka Fajar-5) all the way into the West Bank. It's the longest range they've
reached yet. Over 200 Katyusha rockets have been fired today.

But is there also movement on a cease fire?


Asked about when a ceasefire could be agreed, White House spokesman Tony
Snow said: “I don't want to make a promise on it … but I think it's
safe to say days.” – Reuters

It's about waiting for the international calvary if you ask me. Right now it's the
conventional IDF versus the Hezbollah guerilla force. According to CNN, the U.S.
and France are working off the same page, though the French want an immediate
cease fire, but Bush does not. Also, the French forces, who may be the ones on the ground, will not disarm Hezbollah, but will
instead only support the Lebanese government. The disagreement… er, confusion has led to another
postponement of the decision, likely until next week CNN is reporting, but that could change
because this situation is nothing if not fluid.

Lastly, I was invited to the Monday event Steve
Clemons
had for the Saudi Ambassador to the US Prince Turki Al-Faisal, but
couldn't make this dinner, unfortunately. (I have been to the New American Foundation, which is where I met Charles Pena.) But Steve
posted on it, so please check out what was discussed, as well as John
Dickerson's comments
, also found on Slate. It's interesting and focused on the fact that the Saudis believe U.S. foreign policy
is woefully off track in the Middle East.

No kidding. As for Congress, silence, oh, except for Chuck Hagel.

UPDATE (3:35 p.m.): Top U.S. commanders, speaking on “Hardball”, with Mike Barnicle substituting for Matthews, weigh in on Israel's campaign against Hezbollah. The reviews are negative.

VIEW THE VIDEO

UPDATE II (7:11 p.m.): One thing we learned tonight from Michael Ware, not too long ago, was that the Israel's believed the hospital in Baalbek treated the Israeli soldiers that had been kidnapped. The video below is from earlier today from Wolf Blitzer's Situation Room, regarding aerial bombing, as well as video from the Baalbek attack.


WATCH THE VIDEO

Read full story · Comments are closed