TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Tag Archives | Joe Sestak

Joe Sestak Beat Crazy Curt

cross-posted on Huffington Post


Congratulations, Joe Sestak.

Good riddance, crazy Curt Weldon.



Democrat Joe Sestak defeated Republican Rep. Curt Weldon in Pennsylvania on Tuesday, picking up an important seat for Democrats in their bid to take control of the U.S. House of Representatives.

Projections by television network Fox and CBSNews.com projected that Sestak defeated Weldon, who faced questions involving his daughter's lobbying business and whether he used his influence to help her. Weldon denied the allegations, but was unable to beat back Sestak's strong challenge.

Democrats win US House seat in Pennsylvania

We can be so proud of this win. A terrific Democratic veteran unseated a man who deserves to go. I'm very proud to have been a very small part of this fight.

Way to go, Joe.

Netroots, take a bow.


The Democrats have won back the House. Rahm Emanuel, chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), nearly tripped over himself on the way to the microphone to claim the credit. In fact, while the tidal wave in the House looks like a bit of strategic genius by Emanuel–and pundits are starting to call it that way (Howard Fineman on MSNBC noted that the Democrats even picked up a seat in Kentucky, where the 3rd District candidate was John Yarmuth–”Emanuel's fourth choice!” Fineman exclaimed, as if in awe of the power possessed by Emanuel's mere table scraps)–in race after race, it actually represents the apotheosis of forces Emanuel has doubted all long: the netroots.

In two competitive House races in the Bluegrass State, Emanuel's first choices lost by eleven and nine points. In the 2nd District it was Colonel Mike Weaver, the cofounder of Commonwealth Democrats, a group of conservative Democratic state legislators. In the 4th, it was Ken Lucas, a former congressman whom Robert Novak recently called “moderate conservative” in a column on Emanuel's “recruiting coup” in coaxing Lucas out of retirement. Both were the kind of candidates Emanuel has favored in his famous nationwide recruiting drive. Yarmuth, meanwhile, was founder of the state's first alternative newspaper, said things on the campaign trail things like “the No Child Left Behind Act … is a plan deliberately constructed to create 'failing' schools,” and called for “a universal health care system in which every citizen has health insurance independent of his or her employment.”

Who deserves credit for the Democratic comeback?, by Rick Perlstein

Read full story · Comments are closed

Joe Sestak Fights

Hey Crazy Curt, you aren't going to swiftboat Joe Sestak. He's not standing alone, baby. He's got lots of veterans and soldiers by his side.

Republicans take notice. Democratic veterans are not going to sit by and let you claim suppport of all soldiers. Meet the fighting Dems. We're in your face and we're not taking any of your crap anymore.

Besides, you've got other troubles these days, Curt old boy. Your past is catching up with you. Good riddance, I say. These emails being exposed and the FBI investigation are a long time coming.

Support Joe Sestak

Read full story · Comments are closed

Crazy Curt Insults the Uniform AGAIN

–updated–
cross-posted on Huffington Post

UPDATE (2:05 p.m.): CREW got the damning emails. They're asking for an investigation. Weldon threatened retaliation against contributors to Sestak. I've also seen these emails. They're real.


It's not the first time and it won't be the last.

Wait until you hear this. During the debate today between Curt Weldon and Joe
Sestak, Crazy Curt's contempt for the U.S. military came spewing forth.

When under pressure, the truth will out.


“Were you always in the admiral quarter drinking out of your
wine goblets and being waited on by your sailor servants?”

Curt Weldon

Hey Curt, why don't you tell us how you really feel about veterans?

What a disgrace.

SUPPORT
JOE SESTAK

Volunteer!

Let me add, my source for the quote was at the debate.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Long Time Coming for Crazy Curt

The GOP is ticked.
Aaaaawww, I'm just so upset, aren't you? But that doesn't keep Karl
Rove from spreading his election
year manure
.

I don't know about you, but when my representative starts making deals with
friends with ties to Slobodan Milosevic
I start wondering. Not exactly a local tie in, if you catch my drift.



In fact, Weldon did inadvertently make one good point in crying foul at the
timing: many of the facts of the case have been in plain sight for over two
years, since The Los Angeles Times reported
them
:

Weldon has brought his daughter so deeply into his official activities
that they sometimes appear to be working in tandem. For example:

After a Russian aerospace manufacturer [Saratov] hired Karen Weldon's firm
for $20,000 a month plus 10% of any new business it generated, Rep. Weldon
pitched the company's saucer-shaped drone to the U.S. Navy, which signed
a letter of intent to invest in the technology. And Weldon, who chairs a
subcommittee that oversees $60 billion in military acquisitions, has been
working to get funding for the project, Navy officials say…

The congressman helped round up 30 congressional colleagues for a dinner
at the Library of Congress to honor the chairman of a Russian natural gas
company, Itera International Energy Corp., that had just agreed to pay his
daughter's firm $500,000 a year to “create good public relations.”
Records show Solutions North America helped arrange the privately funded
affair for the company…

Karen Weldon's firm paid for her father's chief of staff to take a “fact-finding”
trip to Serbia, where he met with U.S. Embassy officials about the Karics'
visa problems. The congressman approved the arrangement, travel records
show. House ethics rules bar members or staff from taking official trips
paid for by lobbyists or registered agents of foreign companies …

Curt's
New Hurt

What new information prompted the FBI to activate its investigation into Curt
Weldon and his daughter this spring? And from whom did it come?
By Laura Rozen

But you don't have to look far to see Crazy Curt's cozy family deals should
have been investigated a loooong time ago. The following research was
sent to me and I think it's worth offering for those skeptics who think the
heat on Weldon is unwarranted. It's a long time coming, if you ask me.


KAREN WELDON

Karen Weldon Co-Owns Lobbying Firm “Solutions North America.” Daughter
Karen Weldon is a 50-50 partner in a lobbying firm called “Solutions
North America.” The Los Angeles Times writes, “Despite a lack of
professional credentials, she had one notable asset — her father, U.S.
Rep. Curt Weldon.” Karen's partner is Charles Sexton, former finance
chairman of Curt Weldon's campaigns. [Los Angeles Times, 2/20/04]

Weldon Has “Gone to Bat” For Karen's Clients. Rep. Weldon “has
gone to bat” for at least three of Karen Weldon's clients: Russian military
contractor Saratov Aviation, Russian energy company Itera International Energy
Corp, and The Karic Group, a Serbian firm with ties to Slobodan Milosevic.
The contracts the three companies signed with Karen's firm are worth almost
$1 million a year. [Los Angeles Times, 2/20/04]

· Saratov: Rep. Weldon pitched Saratov's saucer-shaped drone to the
U.S. Navy, which signed a letter of intent to invest in the technology. Weldon,
who chairs a subcommittee that oversees $60 billion in military acquisitions,
worked to get funding for the project, Navy officials say. Saratov hired Karen
Weldon's firm for $20,000 a month plus 10% of any new business it generated.
[Los Angeles Times, 2/20/04]

· Itera: Rep. Weldon organized a dinner with 30 congressional colleagues
to honor Itera's chairman. Itera had just agreed to a $500,000 a year contract
with Karen's firm. Itera sent e-mails to Karen Weldon indicating that the
final details of their proposed $500,000 contract with Itera would be ironed
out at the dinner. [Los Angeles Times, 2/20/04; Philadelphia Inquirer, 5/5/04]

· The Karic Group: Karen's firm, Solutions North America, paid for
a 2003 “fact finding” trip to Serbia for Weldon's Chief of Staff
where he met with U.S. Embassy officials about visa problems being had by
owners of The Karic Group, a Karen Weldon client. House ethics rules bar members
or staff from taking official trips paid for by lobbyists or registered agents
of foreign companies. The chief of staff, Michael J. Conallen Jr., said he
reimbursed Solutions with his own money [Los Angeles Times, 2/20/04]

Ethics Committee Conducted an Investigation Into Curt Weldon's Involvement
with Karen's Clients. In 2004, the House Ethics Committee conducted an informal
investigation into Weldon's involvement with Karen Weldon's clients. The inquiry
remains unfinished [Philadelphia Inquirer, 5/5/04; Los Angeles Times, 1/28/06]

Weldon Denies All Wrongdoing. Weldon said that his daughter, Karen Weldon,
won the contracts because of her own “hard work, determination and abilities.”
Weldon said, “At no time, have I ever suggested, encouraged, or demanded
that anyone enter into a contractual relationship with Solutions North America.”
[Associated Press, 2/21/04]

ANDREW WELDON

Weldon's Son is a Racecar Driver Sponsored by Shaffer Motorsports. Curt Weldon's
22 year old son, Andrew, is a race car driver who is sponsored by Shaffer
Motorsports. Shaffer Motorsports is in turn sponsored by Boeing Helicopters
Credit Union, whose logo appears on Andrew Weldon's car. [http://www.shaffermotorsports.com/new_page_2.htm
; Harpers, 7/25/06]

Shaffer Motorsports is Owned by a Senior Boeing Employee. Shaffer Motorsports
is owned by Tom Shaffer. Shaffer has a senior position in the Composite Fabrication
Department for Boeing's controversial V-22 Osprey, at Boeing's Ridley Park,
Pennsylvania—just outside Weldon's district. [Harpers, 7/25/06]

· Weldon Has Been Congress' Most Vocal Supporter of the V-22 Project.
Weldon has been Congress' most vocal supporter of the Osprey for years. The
Osprey, a hybrid aircraft that takes off like a helicopter and flies like
a plane, has been plagued with problems. Between 1989 and 2002, dozens of
marines were killed in non-combat crashes of the experimental aircraft. In
the 1st Bush Administration, then Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney tried multiple
times to kill the Osprey and each time was met with congressional resistance.
According to the Los Angeles Times, “Leading the charge was Rep. Curt
Weldon, a Republican from the Philadelphia suburbs and a member of the Armed
Services Committee.” Weldon even formed a congressional coalition, the
Tiltrotor Technology Coalition, to fight any attempt to eliminate the Osprey,
despite its problems. Weldon successfully fought off Cheney's attempts. Almost
a decade later, after a 2000 crash that killed another 4 marines, and 2001
evidence that Pentagon officials had falsified readiness records pertaining
to the Osprey, Weldon came to the project's defense again. [Los Angeles Times,
12/18/02; Harpers, 7/25/06]

· Boeing is Weldon's Top All Time Contributor. Boeing is Weldon's
top all time contributor to his campaigns, having donated $62,050 since 1989.
[www.opensecrets.org]

· Shaffer Greeted Bush During Visit to Boeing Plant Set up by Weldon.
In 2004, Bush visited the Ridley Park Boeing plant. Shaffer was the President's
“Freedom Corps greeter” at the airport. Bush honored Shaffer and
Shaffer Motorsports for setting up the “Race Against Drugs” and
other substance abuse awareness programs. Weldon set up Bush's visit to the
plant, though it is not known whether he arranged for Bush to meet Shaffer.
In his speech at the plant, Bush said, “I appreciate my friend, Curt
Weldon… I want to thank Curt for setting up this visit. I appreciate
his leadership and his friendship.” [http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/08/20040817-5.html
; http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/08/20040817-6.html]

KIM WELDON

Daughter Kim Works for Helicopter Manufacturer. Weldon's daughter Kim works
for Augusta Westland, the helicopter division of an Italian firm, Finmeccanica.
[Philadelphia Daily News, 4/21/06]

· Weldon Helps Daughter's Company Land “Long-shot” Marine
One Contract. In 2006, Weldon helped Augusta Westland win a “long-shot
bid” to build a new presidential helicopter, a contract worth $1.6 billion.
[Harpers, 4/20/06]

· Since 2005, Augusta-Westland Employees Have Donated Over $11,000
to Weldon. Seven donors associated with Augusta have given Weldon $11,200
since last year. [Philadelphia Inquirer, 5/8/06]

Weldon Helped Clients of Lobbyists Close to Him. Lobbyist Cecelia Grimes,
who is close to Weldon personally, has little experience lobbying. But her
clients received government contracts and were invited to testify before Congress
by Weldon. Weldon went to bat for products her clients produced. Lobbyist
Stephanie Reiser was a fundraiser for Curt Weldon and he asked member of Congress
to attend a briefing on product being advanced by one of Reiser's clients.
While Weldon said he was unaware of her lobbying, Reiser said he was. [Los
Angeles Times, 1/28/06; Delaware County Times, 2/27/06]

Delaware County Times Editorialized On Weldon's Ethics. In an editorial entitled
“Weldon Should Answer Some Questions,” the Delaware County Times
said that with respect to Weldon's close ties to Reiser and her client that,
“the facts, as they are, stink to high heaven.” The paper wrote,
“[E]thical watchdogs say the situation Reiser had with Weldon – PAC or
campaign fund-raisers doubling as lobbyists – is wrong because it gives them
an inside track with lawmakers. Proposals to ban that kind of relationship
are floating around now on Capitol Hill. It's an idea worth pursuing. Perhaps
Weldon will someday let his constituents know where he stands on the issue
– directly, in his own words, and not hiding behind a statement issued by
one of his employees.” [Delaware County Times, 3/2/06]

Oh, and to answer reader ironranger's question in the comments, yes, that's what Crazy Curt said.


Chutzpah watch: a contact in Weldon's district writes, “BTW, Weldon campaign is claiming today that the raids are firing up their base.”Laura Rozen

Read full story · Comments are closed

Crazy Curt Finally Cracks

Curt Weldon has collapsed and The Spin got it on tape. But thank goodness his sense of the absurd and passion for conspiracy theories lives on.

It's not Weldon or any shenanigans by his daughter, nooooo.

It's Sandy Berger.

It's Jamie Gorelick.

It's President Bill Clinton?

The Democrats are out to get Crazy Curt. Alert the media.

Oh, and did I mention the “anonymous” operative, which Weldon excoriates,
but then names? Ah yes, Melanie Sloan of CREW. She's evidently commandeered
the Justice Department so they could target poor old Curt. Who knew we could do that? Let's get busy, people, the Justice Dept. is ours. Puh-leaze.

The man is quite simply delusional.

He's also whining that the campaign has gotten negative. Boo-hoo-hoo. Those
mean Democrats are fighting back. Dastardly devils! How dare they… what?

The FBI has has been utilizing a grand jury to look into Crazy Curt's connections
with his daughter and her possible sweetheart deal from daddy. It started almost
four months ago. They pulled the trigger now because of fear that evidence would
disappear. Now Weldon is complaining. But what if the FBI hadn't pulled the
trigger until after the election? What would that look like? A cover up. You
go when you got to go, to to speak.

But Crazy Curt just wants us to know that Sestak wouldn't stand a chance without
national help. Everybody loves Curt. I don't think so. The truth is that Crazy
Curt hasn't had a real race in ages. Democrats didn't field a candidate that
could win until Joe Sestak. Now all Weldon can do is whine. He doesn't even
have Able Danger to rattle anymore.

Just be thankful Crazy Curt has put down the shovel he was going to take to
Iraq. The trip that was going to find Saddam's WMD when no other person on the
planet could do it before him. Be grateful he's no longer swiftboating Joe Sestak,
which began when Sestak's daughter was fighting a malignant brain tumor and
trying to stay alive. Appreciate that, even though Curt can't decide whether
he got teaching deferments (it lives
on
) or actually dodged the draft by making up some bad eyesight story, which was concocted when Curt
decided he looked like a Dick Cheney deferment punk next to Sestak's vet status. The FBI has finally, at long last, after 4 months of grand jury investigation,
pulled the trigger to find out if Crazy Curt cronied up his daughter in
a cozy deal to help his own.

If we keep working and the election isn't stollen votes are all counted, pretty soon we won't have Crazy Curt to kick around anymore.

h/t TPM Muckraker for YT.

SUPPORT DEMOCRATS

Read full story · Comments are closed

Crazy Curt’s Daughter Gets a Visit

By on 16 October 2006

Knock. Knock.

Who's there?

The FBI.

Oops!


Federal agents raided the home of the daughter of U.S. Rep. Curt Weldon (R.,
Pa.) and his longtime friend Charlie Sexton this morning.

The agents departed Karen Weldon's three-story brick home on Queen Street
in Philadelphia with arms loaded with boxes.

A government car pulled into the alley to the back door of the house and
loaded boxes into it. Three agents standing in an alley declined to identify
themselves.

“I can confirm that we conducted a number of searches regarding an ongoing
investigation,” said FBI agent Jerri Williams, a spokeswoman in Philadelphia.
“Details regarding those investigation cannot be provided because the
accompanying affidavit is sealed.”

Agents raid homes
of Rep. Curt Weldon’s daughter, close friend

We can win this seat.

Go Joe Sestak!

Read full story · Comments are closed

Joe Sestak in Dead Heat with Crazy Curt

By on 30 September 2006

cross-posted at Huffington Post

Swiftboating Joe Sestak
hasn't worked, so get prepared for Crazy Curt to go over the top.

Rep. Curt Weldon has already gone after former Admiral Joe Sestak's daughter,
when she was fighting a malignant brain tumor.

He went after Sestak when he was showing his support for fallen veterans.

Crazy Curt simply can't pass up an opportunity to swiftboat his opponent. And
I know quite a bit about swiftboating,
because I cover it regularly.

But now that Sestak is dead even — one point ahead in one poll — you can
bet it's only going to get worse.


Sestak is leading Weldon 44-43 in a Franklin & Marshall College Keystone
Poll that will be released today, falling well within the 4.7-percent margin
of error. The poll of 430 voters refutes a recent Republican poll that showed
Weldon leading by 19 points.

Democrats greeted the numbers as proof that Sestak has begun to have an impact
on the electorate through nonstop campaigning and his first TV ad that hit
the district two weeks ago.

“No one campaigns harder than Joe Sestak,” said his senior campaign
adviser, David Landau. “I just don’t know when he sleeps. He has
more energy and more drive than any candidate I have ever worked for.”

Poll:
Weldon, Sestak locked in dead heat

However, Curt Weldon has a problem. After almost two decades in the House not
even his own Republican Party trusts him with any authority. Maybe it's because
he goes off half cocked all the time; like when he wanted to take
his shovel and go dig
for WMDs in Iraq.

Or maybe it was his tin foil hat theory about Able
Danger
, which has now been completely and thoroughly debunked by
the DOD's Inspector General. Nice that Curt made the U.S. taxpayers pay for
a hearing and an investigation. Here's what military analyst Bill Arkin had
to say about Curt Weldon's shenanigans.


… The IG (Inspector General) found no evidence that Able Danger or any
other government entity had identified Mohamed Atta or other terrorist cells
involved in the attackes of Sept. 11, period. “None of the Able Danger
team members, who were in a far better position to describe Able Danger findings”
than Shaffer or Weldon, including the Air Force commander of the unit, agree
that Mohamed Atta or other Sept. 11 hijackers were ever identified, the IG
says. They found not only inconsistent statements from Shaffer and other witnesses
who previously have spoken up in the media and in conversations and testimony
before Weldon, but also witnesses who later changed their statements and disavowed
memories and stories attributed to them by Shaffer and Weldon.

For offenses that are redacted from the IG report on privacy grounds, Shaffer’s
security clearance was revoked by the Defense Department in February 2006.
Some will take this to mean that Shaffer is an honorable whistleblower whose
life and career is being ruined by the system. My sense, after reporting on
the Able Danger story for over a year is that if anyone is to be blamed, it
is Congressman Weldon: he cynically has used Shaffer & co. to pursue a
fantasist political agenda. He is indefensible. …

The
Final Verdict on Able Danger
, by William Arkin

Laura Rozen has a piece out in the American Prospect that is equally critical.


A case in point: Last year, with Weldon’s support, an Italian-led consortium,
AgustaWestland-Lockheed, won a $1.6 billion Navy contract to build the next
generation of presidential helicopters over a U.S.-led consortium. As part
of its bid, AgustaWestland, the helicopter subsidiary of Italian defense giant
Finmeccanica, expanded its Philadelphia plant operations.

But there was more to the deal than jobs for his district. According to Harper’s
magazine reporter Ken Silverstein, AgustaWestland hired another Weldon daughter,
Kim, to work in its public-relations department. Furthermore, another Finmeccanica
subsidiary, Oto Melara, hired the real-estate agent, Cecelia Grimes, as its
lobbyist. Keith Ashdown of Taxpayers for Common Sense says Weldon promoted
Grimes’ lobbying clients in other ways. “Her clients were being
profiled at congressional hearings that [Weldon] ran,” Ashdown recalls.

Observers say Weldon is a perfect reflection of the political machine he
has represented over the years. “Delaware County is, if not the most
powerful, then one of the oldest and most successful political machines in
the United States,” says former Weldon opponent Dave Landau. “And
Weldon is only a functionary of the machine.”

Anger
Management
,
by Laura Rozen
The House’s most erratic member, Curt Weldon, may finally hit
a wall.

I've been studying Weldon ever since he started swiftboating Joe Sestak. But
when Rocco Polidoro of Republicans for Sestak asked why Weldon never served
his country, it really peaked my interest. We still don't have answers on Curt
Weldon's shifting stories
on that one.

So now that the race is a dead heat, with Joe
Sestak
actually ahead in one poll, hold on to your seats, because Crazy
Curt is in a fight for his political life.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Crazy Curt Weldon’s Able Danger Stunt Implodes

By on 25 September 2006

Indiana Weldon has many tin foil hat issues that deserve the light of
day.

As I wrote recently, the shifting
story narrative of his draft dodging
and why he didn't go to Vietnam is
just one of them. It's not just the fact that he might have dodged the draft
that bothers me and many others. After all, it was 1969 when everyone knew Vietnam
was a loser, so nobody wanted to be the last guy to die for a mistake, as John
Kerry would say. It's the fact that once he met his challenger, former Admiral
Joe Sestak
, it seems his original deferment story needed a little
brushing up. That's when his bad eyesight story was born. But that's just the
latest silliness in Crazy Curt's world.

Laura
Rozen
has a new article out for the American Prospect that outlines
the rest.


Probably Weldon’s most notorious venture into the dark side
is something known to insiders as “Able Danger,” an obscure and
now defunct Pentagon data-mining program. Weldon claims the program identified
the chief September 11 hijacker months before the attacks. The villains in
his theory are civil-liberties-minded Pentagon lawyers who supposedly blocked
analysts from sharing their findings with the FBI. He has even alleged that
the 9-11 Commission conspired in a cover-up of the Able Danger findings. (Both
the Pentagon and the 9-11 Commission vigorously dispute his accusations.)
Laura
Rozen

It's bad enough that Weldon
swiftboated a venerated veteran like Sestak
, but we've all come to expect
that these days in the era of EFF
and big scale media companies like XM,
who actually promote swiftboating events through the right-wing talk radio hosts
they carry. But what Weldon did over Able Danger is reprehensible.


… The IG (Inspector General) found no evidence that Able Danger or any
other government entity had identified Mohamed Atta or other terrorist cells
involved in the attackes of Sept. 11, period. “None of the Able Danger
team members, who were in a far better position to describe Able Danger findings”
than Shaffer or Weldon, including the Air Force commander of the unit, agree
that Mohamed Atta or other Sept. 11 hijackers were ever identified, the IG
says. They found not only inconsistent statements from Shaffer and other witnesses
who previously have spoken up in the media and in conversations and testimony
before Weldon, but also witnesses who later changed their statements and disavowed
memories and stories attributed to them by Shaffer and Weldon.

For offenses that are redacted from the IG report on privacy grounds, Shaffer’s
security clearance was revoked by the Defense Department in February 2006.
Some will take this to mean that Shaffer is an honorable whistleblower whose
life and career is being ruined by the system. My sense, after reporting on
the Able Danger story for over a year is that if anyone is to be blamed, it
is Congressman Weldon: he cynically has used Shaffer & co. to pursue a
fantasist political agenda. He is indefensible. …

The
Final Verdict on Able Danger
, by William Arkin

One thing Crazy Curt has is connections. You know, in that old style, political
boss-type way. It greases the wheels that keeps Crazy Curt in power.


A case in point: Last year, with Weldon’s support, an Italian-led consortium,
AgustaWestland-Lockheed, won a $1.6 billion Navy contract to build the next
generation of presidential helicopters over a U.S.-led consortium. As part
of its bid, AgustaWestland, the helicopter subsidiary of Italian defense giant
Finmeccanica, expanded its Philadelphia plant operations.

But there was more to the deal than jobs for his district. According to Harper’s
magazine reporter Ken Silverstein, AgustaWestland hired another Weldon daughter,
Kim, to work in its public-relations department. Furthermore, another Finmeccanica
subsidiary, Oto Melara, hired the real-estate agent, Cecelia Grimes, as its
lobbyist. Keith Ashdown of Taxpayers for Common Sense says Weldon promoted
Grimes’ lobbying clients in other ways. “Her clients were being
profiled at congressional hearings that [Weldon] ran,” Ashdown recalls.

Observers say Weldon is a perfect reflection of the political machine
he has represented over the years.
“Delaware County is, if
not the most powerful, then one of the oldest and most successful political
machines in the United States,” says former Weldon opponent Dave Landau.
“And Weldon is only a functionary of the machine.”

Anger
Management
, by Laura Rozen (emphasis added)
The House’s most erratic member, Curt Weldon, may finally hit a wall.

It's all about Weldon's political muscle machine. Because though it's not
often written about, Curt Weldon isn't taken very seriously in the House or
around Washington. After all, he didn't get the nickname Indiana
Weldon
because he's from Indiana. Long after WMDs were no longer a viable
excuse for preemptive war, Curt was ready to head off to Iraq with his little
shovel in his hand to prove all the weapons inspectors, the United States military
and everyone else had been wrong about WMD. Dave Gaubatz, who was supposed to go with Weldon on his WMD
digging expedition, finally backed out when he found out that Crazy Curt was
just hyping it for political publicity, which is Weldon's specialty.

There's also Weldon's support for Uzbekistan's thug, Islam Karimov, who has
reportedly boiled people alive. Talk about Republicans
for Torture in '06 unite!
(Anything
to not talk about Iraq
.) Evidently, Crazy Karimov is Crazy Curt's kind of
guy. I'm not the only one who feels it's time for Curt Weldon to be fired.


The House of Representatives of our era doesn’t lack for camp spectacle.
There’s Indiana’s Dan Burton, who shot at melons in his backyard
to “prove” that the Clintons had Vince Foster murdered. Tom Tancredo
of Colorado once advocated that America “take out” Muslim holy
sites. The list goes on.

But that list, lengthy as it is, is surely topped by Pennsylvania’s
Curt Weldon. Known as something of a fist-banger and loose cannon — and continually
denied a committee chairmanship by his fellow House Republicans despite his
20 years of service — Weldon has a knack for uncovering fantastic government
conspiracies. Word of this is finally getting around his suburban Philadelphia
district, and he faces his first real challenge in ages this fall, from Joe
Sestak, a retired Navy vice admiral fed up with Republican national-security
policy.

Weldon’s reputation for Tom Clancy-esque capers may be more than offset
by another longtime habit — his ability to bring defense money into the district.
That it sometimes arrives with strings attached, like the hiring of Weldon
friends and family members, seems to matter less than the fact that it arrives
at all. It will take a Democratic tsunami for Weldon to lose, so this race
is worth watching for two reasons: as an electoral bellwether, and because
a Weldon departure would restore a measure of sanity to Washington. …

Anger
Management
(emphasis added)
The House’s most erratic member, Curt Weldon, may finally hit a wall.

Now let's get to the crux of Crazy Curt. His wholesale creation of the Able
Danger story is enough to prove he's not all there. He did blogger conference
calls ratcheting up the frenzy; investing time and energy of his congressional
office trying to get this story stirred up, not to mention spending taxpayers' money on a tin foil hat conspiracy theory.
But it's finally been put to rest, which included Curt spending more cash to
prove a negative. The DOD's
Inspector General's office
has finally put the nail in Curt Weldon's 9/11
fantasy theories. That's the end of it, right? Wrong, because according to Curt even the DOD Inspector General is wrong. It's a whitewash! Ho-boy.


A Pentagon report rejects the idea that intelligence gathered by a secret
military unit could have been used to stop the Sept. 11 hijackings. … …

The report was ordered following the assertion last year that the unit had
identified four of the 19 hijackers in 2000. That contention was made by a
former intelligence officer who worked on Able Danger, Lieutenant Colonel
Anthony Shaffer, and by Representative Curt Weldon, vice chairman of the House
Armed Services and Homeland Security committees.

Weldon, Republican of Pennsylvania, has said the unit used data-mining to
link Atta and three other hijackers to Al Qaeda more than a year before the
attacks. The 71-page report, blacked out in parts, rejected Weldon's contention
that the unit wanted information given to the FBI but that Pentagon lawyers
would not allow it.

Weldon questioned the “motives and the content” of the report and rejected
its conclusions. “Acting in a sickening bureaucratic manner, the DOD IG cherry-picked
testimony from witnesses in an effort to minimize the historical importance
of the Able Danger effort,” Weldon said in a statement.

Pentagon
rejects idea hijackers were known before 9/11

Rep. Weldon went so far as to accuse the 9/11 Commission panel of covering
up Able Danger. He just won't accept the DOD's
Inspector General's
report. He's likely making a new tin foil hat as we speak.

Rep. Weldon belongs to the crazy lunatic fringe crowd who, because of his political money machine, has been able to keep himself in power. It speaks volumes that his own party won't let him control the wheels
of any committee even though he's been in power since 1987. Considering all
the mistakes in Iraq, compounded by Indiana Weldon's tin foil hat Able Danger
nonsense, it's a miracle he still has his job. Let's hope his luck is about to run out.

SUPPORT
ADMIRAL JOE SESTAK

(Don't forget, free CDs for every donation, while
they last!)

Read full story · Comments are closed

Joe Sestak is the Man

By on 13 September 2006

I started this day talking about the Rep. Curt Weldon.

It's only fitting that I end my day with the man who deserves to unseat him,
Joe Sestak.

By the way, Ed will have a special late night post tonight. You won't want
to miss it.

Now get busy and support Joe Sestak, James Webb and the rest of the Dems. We're
coming down to the wire and they need your help.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Did Curt Weldon Dodge the Draft?

By on 13 September 2006

–updated–
cross-posted at Firedoglake and Huffington Post

If you're not familiar with Curt Weldon, he's the guy who wanted to take his shovel to Iraq, and excavate the country in hopes of finding WMD nobody else could find. It earned him a little chiding and by inference the title of Indiana Weldon in the Philadelphia Inquirer. He was also the leader in the Able Danger campaign, doing blogger conference calls ad nauseam to drum up support for the now infamous group. Well, in the past months, something else has come to my attention that casts further doubt on Mr. Weldon's credibility.


“Where is Weldon's uniform? Why didn't Weldon serve during the
'60s. There was a war on; there was a draft. … He wasn't drafted. Why?”

Rocco Polidoro,
Republican co-chair of Veterans for Sestak

I got interested in the Weldon – Sestak race when Curt Weldon decided to swiftboat Joe Sestak, starting with a smear against his daughter, who just so happened to be fighting a malignant brain tumor at the time. Classy stuff in this race, because Weldon didn't stop there, next swiftboating Sestak for wearing his uniform, which was quickly smacked down. Evidently Curt was a little jealous he didn't have one. Which brings me to the point of this post. Why didn't Curt Weldon have a uniform of his own?

As Rocco Polidoro asked back in July, why wasn't Curt Weldon drafted? It's a logical question given his birth date is July 22, 1947. That would have made him of prime drafting age when the first lottery was launched in December 1969. Why does this matter today?

Curt Weldon, in addition to swiftboating his veteran opponent Joe Sestak, is the second ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee. He sits along side one of my other favorites Rep. Duncan Hunter who has been front and center in the swiftboating of Jack Murtha, which I chronicled for The Patriot Project. I've done many pieces on swiftboating, my most recent for
Alternet. Weldon is also
always trumpeting his support for the troops. But if Weldon is so supportive
of the troops why didn't he serve when he had the chance? And boy did he have
a chance.

The following comes from a New York Times piece dated December 4,
1969 by David E. Rosenbaum, “Questions and Answers of Draft.” As a
blog reporter, one of the many hats I wear that includes radio host, I get lots of things slipped to me over the transom, while other things just fall into my lap. This was one of them, which is just a sampling of the material I've received over the last couple of months. Oh, and by the way, none of the information in this post was given to me by the Sestak campaign. Let's just say Weldon has made some enemies, especially when he started swiftboating a veteran.


Since the draft lottery was conducted Monday night, the national Selective Service headquarters, local draft boards and newspaper offices have been deluged with telephone calls from persons with questions about their draft status.

Following are some of the most frequently asked questions and their answers:

Q. Who was affected by the lottery. A. Men born between Jan. 1, 1944, and Dec. 31, 1950. In other words, men who have had their 19th birthday by Jan. 1 but not their 26th.

(snip)

Q. What numbers are likely to be called?

A Pentagon experts say that the first third–numbers 1 to 122–are certain to be called; the last third, 245-366, certain not to be called; and the middle third not certain one way or the other. One expert who has done careful calculations believes the cutoff number will be somewhere between 165 and 195.

Q. Is the sequence applied nationally, or is it my place in the sequence within my own draft board that counts?

A. It is the sequence in each local board that matters. But the cutoff number between those who are drafted and those who are not will not vary much from board to board. …

Questions and Answers on Draft (Dec 4, 1969)
by David E. Rosenbaum – Special to The New York Times

According to the Selective Service System, using his birth date, Curt Weldon would have had number 153 in the first draft lottery held since 1947: “This event determined the order of call for induction during calendar year 1970, that is, for registrants born between January 1, 1944, and December 31, 1950.” According to official records, 162,746 men were inducted in 1970.

Rep. Curt Weldon says he wanted to serve. According to the DelcoTimes the reason he didn't was because his eyesight was so bad they wouldn't take him.


Pete Peterson, a Weldon spokesman, said Polidoro's position within the Sestak campaign proves that the Memorial Day parade was a political event in which a Navy uniform cannot be worn.

“That demonstrates right there that his invitation was political,” Peterson said.

He added that Weldon, 59, “wanted to serve, but the military would not take him because of his extremely poor eyesight.”

Pa. GOP rips Sestak for wearing Navy uniform

Here are the Medical Fitness Standards used back in 1969 for the Selective Service, for which I can't provide a link, but I offer verbatim through section
“2-13. Vision”.


The causes for medical rejection for appointment, enlistment, and induction are listed below. The special administrative criteria for officer assignment to Armor, Artillery, Infantry, Corps of Engineers, Singal Corps, and Military Police Corps are listed in paragraph 7-15.

a. Distant visual acuity. Distant visual acuity of any degree which does not correct to at least one of the following:

(1) 20/40 in one eye and 20/70 in the other eye.

(2) 20/30 in one eye and 20/100 in the other eye.

(3) 20/20 in one eye and 20/400 in the other eye.

…or if an ophthalmological consultation reveals a condition which is
disqualifying. …

How bad do your eyes have to be before you weren't accepted in 1969? I wasn't able to find anyone to answer that question, but it seems the Army can always find something for a near-blind soldier to do. In fact, one eye specialist who would not go on record simply stated that you'd have to be almost blind not to go, using the vision guide above. The following is from another war, but an interesting anecdote to say the least.


I did have another ace, however. My eyesight was 20/ 400, far below minimum army requirements. I was, again, so sure the Army would not accept me that I told my New York roommate not to pack my things . . . I’d be back in a few days. At my physical exam the Army doctor asked me to read the top line of the eye chart. When I claimed, half in jest, that I couldn’t even see the chart, he laughed, patted me on the back and assured me that the Army could always find some job for a near- blind draftee. After all it was only for twelve months. Trying a different tack, I unleashed on the doctor my outrage over the Army’s carefree willingness to relax its high standards for service. But he was already examining the next recruit, and I was soon off to Camp Shelby, Mississippi, to join the Ohio 37th National Guard Division training there, accompanied by my dear childhood friend, Carl Ablon, who was not drafted but volunteered because he wanted to share this experience with me. A RELUCTANT SOLDIER

If Rep. Weldon did indeed have eyesight too poor to be drafted, he would have had an Armed Forces Medical Examination during his Induction physical in which he would have received a medical exemption . There is the other possibility that he was pronounced medically unfit, as a colleague said to me, prior to being called to report. If none of these things happened then Curt Weldon would have been drafted, because his number was low enough for Uncle Sam to reach out and touch him directly.

So if Weldon's spokesperson Pete Peterson was correct, that Weldon “wanted to serve but the military would not take him because of his extremely poor eyesight,” there should be records of what exactly went down, right? Has anyone in the media asked him these questions? To my knowledge no one has ever pressed Rep. Curt Weldon on the specifics of his draft story. Did Curt Weldon seek a medical exemption after drawing number 153 in the Vietnam draft of December 1969? If not, why wasn't he drafted?

That would be the only question except that Weldon's bad eyesight story is new. This really bothers me. Because whenever a politician has shifting rationale for something as important as why he didn't serve in the Vietnam war, alarm bells always go off. This is especially true when the person in question is an avowed hawk and military cheerleader, while taking every opportunity to swiftboat his political opponent who is not only a veteran, but a Democrat. I lived through Vietnam and remember the panic, especially during the 1969 draft. No one wanted to go to Vietnam by 1970.

During the 2000 elections, when Curt Weldon was railing at Al Gore, a completely different reason was given for why he didn't serve in Vietnam.


Weldon never served in the military. His office has said he used student and teaching deferments during the Vietnam era, and had a low number when the draft lottery was reinstated.

Curt
demands count of military ballots

Obviously, the writer of the above article got something wrong, or was it a freudian slip by Weldon’s “office”? A “low number” is exactly what Weldon had in 1969 (number 153). The writer meant a high draft number, which would mean he wouldn't be called. As for his deferments, they would have run their course and not covered the period after 1969, as far as I've been able to discern. Note: One of the reasons I used the graphic above is that it's quite possible that Weldon did have deferments to teach in 1969. Just maybe Weldon felt a medical exemption story because of bad eyesight was better than a deferment.

Why did Weldon say one thing about not serving in Vietnam in 2000, talking about deferments, then come up with the bad eyesight version in 2006? Did Democratic veteran Joe Sestak make him feel like a punk?

So did Curt Weldon, an avowed war hawk and a man who drapes himself in the military dodge the draft? Reached for comment, no one was available, so I left a message with Weldon's Director of Communications John Tomaszewski, who was with the congressman when I called. He has not gotten back to me as of this posting.

Maybe the DelcoTimes can get busy getting answers to these questions, which is their job. Because the voters in Pennsylvania's 7th Congressional District need to know if a pro-war hawk who swiftboats Democratic veterans, but fabricates his own draft story that has changed at least once, is really a poser at heart. Draping himself in servicemen and women today shouldn't let him off the hook for his shifting Vietnam draft stories.

Speaking of Weldon being a war hawk, there is a new development on that front. Mr. Weldon has presented a plan for Iraq “withdrawal”. It's called, Iraq: A Milestone Plan for Withdrawal. If Indiana Weldon, the man who trumpeted Able Danger, wants to withdraw from Iraq, Republicans must be indeed be getting very nervous.

But if you think that's interesting, did you hear the one about Weldon using his congressional office to put together a “hit list” of people in the national security field who dare to contribute to his opponent, veteran Joe Sestak? It doesn't sound very kosher to me.

to be continued…

Read full story · Comments are closed

CURT WELDON ATTACKS THE UNIFORM. AND THE VETERAN IN IT.

By on 27 July 2006

originally posted at The Patriot Project, and cross-posted at Huffington Post

Going after a man's daughter; a little girl fighting for her life? I'm spee—wait, I'm getting ahead of myself. This is a post I did exclusively for The Patriot Project, earlier this morning. They are kind enough to let me share it with you.

We've learned to expect anything from Republicans these days. Remember Rep. Musgrave's little veteran photo op?

Look at their attacks on John Murtha. They've turned swiftboating into an art form, black art, that is. So whenever a Republican is in deep trouble, especially if he or she is facing a Democratic veteran, you can be sure they're going to go on the attack. That would be fine if the attacks were about substance, policy or the issues. But for today's Republican Party, attacking veterans, the uniform of the United States, is job one. Just look what Republicans did to the generals.

Democratic candidate Joe Sestak is their latest target. He's facing Curt Weldon, the Indiana Jones of the Republican Party.

… It's a scene out of an Indiana Jones movie – or an Indiana Jones parody:

A caravan of jeeps and heavy equipment crawls across the Iraqi desert, headed for a secret location on the banks of the Euphrates River.

Their mission: to dig 25 feet down into the riverbed and unearth concrete bunkers filled with chemical weapons produced by Saddam Hussein's regime and hidden before the outbreak of the Iraq war in 2003.

And who's that, dressed in a safari jacket and a pith helmet, supervising the dig?

None other than our own U.S. Rep. Curt Weldon (R., Pa.), leading a secret mission to unearth the Holy Grail of the war: the weapons of mass destruction that have eluded every other U.S. search team since our troops invaded three years ago.

Indiana Jones? No, it's Weldon

Talk about embarrassing; Curt Weldon should be the laughing stock of Pennsylvania. Instead, to bolster his sagging political fortunes, he's swiftboating a veteran.

John Kerry knows how it feels and has had Sestak's back from Day One. In fact, since Senator Kerry's own swiftboating experience in the 2004 presidential campaign, he's made it his personal mission to make sure this never happens again, to anyone. This is what Kerry had to say when I contacted him about the latest Sestak attacks:

“I'd like to know what these Republicans who never wore the uniform of our country have against those who did. I saw what they did to John McCain. I saw what they did to Max Cleland. I saw what they tried to do to Jack Murtha, and now they're trying the same sick tactics against Admiral Sestak. We've got to knock this garbage back forever. Never, never, never again. These Republican hacks just got on the battlefield with the wrong soldiers and we're going to make them regret it every step of the way. It's up to us to make sure this dog won't hunt anymore. No more lies, no more smears; this time we're not just going to defend our brother vet, we're making the Republicans pay.”

Meet Representative Curt Weldon. The man who's taking on veteran Joe Sestak . Let's just say that the scales don't balance on the resume side of things. You've got Curt Weldon versus a 31-year veteran, former 3-star Navy admiral, Joe Sestak, who also has a doctorate from Harvard and has “commanded battleship groups during the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, served on the National Security Council (NSC) and revamped the Navy’s strategy for winning wars in the post-Cold War era,” according to The Hill News.

Does it count that Weldon is also running his own personal government employment agency for his family?

No wonder Curt was feeling, shall we say, desperate. But when desperation turns into an attack on a 5 year-old little girl, who just survived a battle with death, and who also happens to be Joe Sestak's daughter, I'd say Weldon's decency wagon has not only lost its bearings, but has veered into a ditch. Weldon thought it appropriate to bring Sestak's daughter into the political mix.



Sitting in the oncology ward at Children’s National Medical Center on Jan. 19, retired Adm. Joe Sestak and his wife, Susan, awaited the doctors’ verdict about the condition of their 5-year-old daughter, Alexandra.

She had been diagnosed with a malignant brain tumor last summer and given three to nine months to live. The Sestaks lived for four months in the ward. They watched as their daughter survived three surgeries, and as she endured chemotherapy.

But that winter day, doctors told the Sestaks that Alexandra had done remarkably well and that, although the cancer could reemerge, she could resume living like a healthy girl.

(snip)

Weldon attacked Sestak’s decision to continue owning a home in Virginia while only renting in Pennsylvania and questioned why Sestak did not move back to Pennsylvania when he was working at the Pentagon. Weldon commutes from Pennsylvania each day.

Weldon also suggested Sestak should have sent his daughter to a hospital in Philadelphia or Delaware, rather than the Washington hospital. Sestak said that as soon as doctors give his daughter the all-clear, he’ll buy in Pennsylvania. …

Sestak’s battles — naval, familial and political

What kind of man challenges a father's choices when his daughter is fighting for her life, all to make a political point?

Sestak fired back.

Unfortunately, “ethicially challenged” Curt Weldon was just getting started. Since attacking a veteran's courageous daughter didn't work, Weldon had to think of something else.

Visions of John McCain in 2000, Max Cleland being compared with Osama and Saddam, as well as the swiftboating “success” of John Kerry danced in Curt's head. Enter the push poll.

I could give you a long explanation, but Tom Ferrick of the Philadelphia Inquirer already has.

The nastiest invention in the increasingly nasty world of political campaigns is something called “push polls.”

These are calls made to voters, ostensibly by public opinion pollsters, that ask loaded questions. An example: “Would you be more or less likely to vote for candidate John Smith if you knew he beat his wife?”

Your answer, of course, is “no.” The caller may pretend to mark that reply down, but that's just a ruse. His sole purpose is to spread a nasty rumor that harms candidate Smith.

Push polls are bad – as in, evil – in three ways:

They are anonymous. The voters never know who paid for the “poll.”

They are deceptive. The poll isn't a legit public opinion poll at all. It is a way of spreading rumors.

They are ugly. Often, the information they seek to spread is false or vastly distorted.

Push polls began to surface in the 1990s. The most famous was one used in the 2000 presidential campaign when campaign operatives, allegedly for George Bush, devised one to stop the surging candidacy of U.S. Sen. John McCain. They launched a push poll in South Carolina, right before the Republican primary there, that asked: “Would you be more likely or less likely to vote for John McCain for president if you knew he had fathered an illegitimate black child?”

The allegation was a lie. But it did serious damage to the McCain candidacy. To add to the irony, McCain and his wife had recently adopted a Bangladeshi orphan. …

Dastardly push polls need to get heave-ho

Perfect! Curt Weldon's kind of politics.

Here's the question voters were asked:

Would you be more or less likely to vote for Sestak if you knew he was (in so many words) a tool of the trial lawyers, pro-abortion, soft on terrorism, and a guy who let Osama bin Laden get away?

Dastardly push polls need to get heave-ho

A former Senior Advisor from the Kerry campaign said to me yesterday that he was “fairly certain that if Osama bin Laden had swum by the Admiral's ship in the Indian Ocean, I'm pretty sure Joe would have caught him.”

Now here comes the good part. Weldon's people said the company who ordered the push polling, Venture Data, don't even work for his campaign. Here's Ferrick's take on it: Venture Data does not appear on Weldon's campaign reports as a vendor, but a company called Progressive Opinion Strategies L.L.C. does. It got $17,000 from Weldon's campaign committee in March. The clips reveal that Progressive and Venture are often aligned in polling operations.

See how this works? Weldon gets to say he didn't fund the despicable Bush-like polling question, because it's technically true, while paying for it through another agent. Now whether this is actually push polling or simply “push questioning” is for someone else to decide. But I'd offer it's just plain wrong, immoral and dishonest. But hiding reality is a specialty of the Republicans.

But don't turn that dial, because the swiftboating of Joe Sestak isn't over. After all, Curt's got over three more months until November, so it's time to get busy.

Last Thursday, the PA GOP released this statement.

Republican State Committee Executive Director Scott Migli today questioned Joe Sestak, Democratic candidate in Pennsylvania's 7th Congressional District, for his repeated violations of federal law and U.S. Navy regulations as it relates to appropriate conduct for the wearing of military uniforms. Those violations include wearing his uniform while engaged in campaign activities and wearing a uniform that displays a rank above what the grade at which he retired from service.

“Joe Sestak's improper use of the military uniform for partisan campaign activities demonstrates a lack of respect for the uniform,” said Migli. “You would never catch a veteran like Senator John McCain, or even Senator John Kerry for that matter, wearing their military uniform while on the campaign trail or inflating the rank at which they retired. The fact that Joe Sestak would stoop this low shows how desperate he is for attention.”

PA GOP: SESTAK'S GOT NO R-E-S-P-E-C-T FOR UNIFORM

The Republican Party is telling a 31-year Navy veteran and retired admiral that he has no respect for the uniform?

Rep. Weldon, prepare for more incoming, including from some of your own, Republicans, that is.

Rocco Polidoro, a Republican co-chair of Veterans for Sestak, and the Commander of a local veterans group said, “Obviously, Curt Weldon needs to be educated on the rules and regulations of the military.  This comes as no surprise considering that Curt has never worn the uniform of the Unites States military. As a Republican, I can safely say that Dwight Eisenhower and Ronald Reagan would be turning in their graves if they knew that Curt Weldon would be using this as another desperate attempt to swift boat a man who served his country for 31 years.”

Jerry Gavin, a member of the Vietnam Veterans of America, Chapter 67, Delaware County said, “Former Vice Admiral Sestak, who is a member of the Vietnam Veterans of America, Chapter 67, Delaware County, participated in the Marcus Hook Memorial Day events with other members of the Delaware County Chapter of the Vietnam Veterans of America.  He was also asked to be a speaker and to read the names of the Navy service members from Delaware County who were killed in Vietnam.  As someone who was myself wounded in Vietnam, it put tears in my eyes to hear Admiral Sestak read the names of those who had given the ultimate sacrifice.  For anyone to criticize him for participating in non-political Memorial Day activities is deeply upsetting.”

According to the U.S. Navy Uniform Regulations:

 U.S. Navy Uniform Regulations, 1401.3.b(2)

(2) Former Members of the Armed Forces.  Unless discussed in DOD Directive
1334.1 or Title 10 U.S. Code Sec. 772, former members who served honorably during a war and whose most recent service was terminated under honorable conditions, may wear the uniform of the highest grade held during their service only on the following occasions and during travel related to those occasions.

(a) Military funerals, memorial services, weddings and inaugurals.

Now let me direct you to a conservative blog that has picked this story up and run with it, using tags like “corruption” and “stolen valor.” The first picture in the comments section is of veteran John Kerry's 1971 testifying before the Senate. It gets worse from there.

americaprd: Wow. Can any vets tell me how big a deal this is? I seem to recall there being a case of a retired or active duty officer who took his own life when given a hard time about wearing a ribbon or award he was not entitled to. Any chance Sestak will repent? How pissed off will this make vets?

.cnI redruM: No chance he'll ever repent. He'd use the uniform as toilet paper if he wasn't using it as a campaign prop instead.

coop: Only stuff I've found has Sestak listed as a Vice Admiral – that's a three-star. Unless someone has some different info, that part of the press release is wrong.
I can't imagine any military member THAT senior and in a public setting trying to fake a rank.

americaprd: The gap between two-star admirals and three-star admirals is the three-star admirals have a better knowledge of what to kiss and when.

taxesareforever: If it's a federal offense, why isn't he arrested? Because he is a democrat.

beltfed308: We need an acronym for someone who joins the military just for the political points. Easy. MINO=Military in name only.

John Kerry's statement comes back, a haunting message to any Democratic veteran who dares challenge a Republican:“I'd like to know what these Republicans who never wore the uniform of our country have against those who did. …”

Weldon's got more troubles, because Sestak is out fundraising him, too.

Joe Sestak

Democratic veteran Joe Sestak just wants another opportunity to serve his country. Frankly, he doesn't quite get all the vitriol; the audacity to challenge a United States veteran's honor, regardless of party, first using his daughter, then the push polling charge about letting Osama escape; topped off by accusing him of disrespect for wearing the uniform while honoring fallen heroes. James Boyce of the Patriot Project had a discussion with Sestak during the YearlyKos convention this past June. He reminded Sestak that “the Navy doesn't hand out Purple Hearts like jelly beans.” That obviously got Sestak to thinking. Republicans will say anything to harm their opponent, truth be damned. James then reminded him that the Republicans came after John Kerry the same way. Their whole campaign strategy is attack – attack – attack. Sestak gets it now. Welcome to political warfare, Admiral.

I also spoke with Rocco Polidoro yesterday, the Republican co-chair of Veterans for Sestak quoted above, who is completely incensed by what Curt Weldon is doing to Joe Sestak. “He has every right to wear it,” said Polidoro, talking about the uniform. They were honoring veterans who had served their country with honor. Then Polidoro got personal: “Where is Weldon's uniform? Why didn't Weldon serve during the '60s. There was a war on; there was a draft. … He wasn't drafted. Why?”

Someone should ask Curt Weldon those questions. His answers matter.

Help Joe Sestak Beat Indiana Jones Weldon

Read full story · Comments are closed