TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Tag Archives | media

Is Newt Still Around?



It’s primary Tuesday and Newt Gingrich is hanging on by his pudgy little fingers. But for how much longer?

Newt Gingrich hinted he may withdraw from the presidential race if he has a poor showing in the Delaware primary Tuesday – a state where he has been actively campaigning for several weeks. – First Read, MSNBC

Politico’s Ginger Gibson, who’s been covering Gingrich, isn’t so sure it’s lost.

Meanwhile, Pres. Obama gets slammed by a Republican group in the video above, with Solyndra and the GSA scandal rich fodder for the right.

For those following the primary results tonight, Buzzfeed and Comedy Central are joining together in a Twitter extravaganza. Watch it at Comedy Central Indecision or Buzzfeed’s FB page, starting at 7:30 p.m.

Oh, and Ann Romney evidently hit it out of the park in Connecticut. I’ve been talking about Mrs. Romney since she started opening for her husband. She’s got the gift.

Read full story · Comments { 1 }

It’s Not ‘Walking While White,’ It’s the Rodney King Syndrome



“Justice for Trayvon” mob beatings are now a rising cause for the right, with a horrific crime leaving one man in critical condition.

Elevating “walking while white” is the most absurdly tortured false equivalency someone can hoist as an answer to George Zimmerman killing Trayvon Martin. But that’s what Erick Erickson was happy to legitimize when he drew attention to this post via Twitter.

And this is the third racially-motivated attack in which the attackers explicitly cited “Justice for Trayvon” as a motivation or excuse for the brutal attacks.

1. The Baltimore Beating. This was the videotaped gang attack on a drunk St. Patrick’s day reveler whose crime was Walking While White (Content Warning).

Baltimore’s Chief of Police says it’s not a hate crime. He’s very worried about the politics.

There’s one problem with that: the attackers say otherwise. The man identifying himself as the cameraman who giddily filmed the attack on the white tourist says…

“Lil Darren” is clearly an idiot. He’s angry, too. His reaction to the Trayvon Martin killing triggered it, which reminded me of another situation that lit another city on fire.

I lived in Los Angeles during the Rodney King beating, trial and riots that engulfed part of the city. When King was beaten by police, which was caught on tape, the outrage was understandably red hot. The tape of the beating was played over and over again on TV. But when the venue to try the policemen involved was changed to Simi Valley, a bleached landscape where many police and firemen live, the outcome was set, many residents thought, including myself. When the verdict came down everyone knew what was coming.

When the National Guard was brought in, I was downtown as an independent writer and watched the tanks move in to the city. It was surreal.

The tragic beating of Matthew Owens, seen in the video above, which was fueled by a “justice for Trayvon” temper explosion, is the same sort of thing and it’s despicable.

What it’s not about is the ridiculous notion of “walking while white.” There’s no white man burden in America, though the right’s been stoking this since affirmative action was born.

It’s about fury.

It’s about the righteous injustice African Americans have had to contend with for over a century. Mobile, Alabama, where Matthew Owens was beaten to within an inch of his life, has a deep history of racial bigotry and violence. That a mob in Mobile could relate to the gunning down of Trayvon Martin through violence shouldn’t shock America.

“Driving while black” is part of the “trying to hail a taxi in New York while being black,” which is part of “walking while black,” all of which can lead to arrest, walking home, or getting killed, especially if you’re wearing a hoodie.

Read full story · Comments { 85 }

The Sex Issue: FP’s Phenomenal Coverage of Women & the Uproar It’s Causing

Everybody should be talking about this. The future of the Middle East turns on it, as does the entire globe.

If you don’t know anything about foreign policy, this is your primer. It sets the 21st century stage & will give you an idea of the real challenges ahead and how the U.S. must continue to expand the opportunities of women if we’re ever going to reverse poverty, and begin to tackle the scurge of war.

Melanne Verveer, Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues under Secy. Clinton, the first role of its kind, has a classic piece. Seriously, Guys: Why Women Are a Foreign Policy Issue,” reads like Secy. Clinton’s platform for U.S. diplomacy, which is part of the Hillary Effect, in a lecture that the “guys” need.

The most pressing global problems simply won’t be solved without the participation of women. Seriously, guys.

[...] This is not just about the economy, though; it’s also about global security. In the 1990s, nearly half of all peace agreements failed within the first five years, according to the Human Security Report Project. These deals are generally struck by a small number of male military and political leaders shielded from war’s impact on daily life. Women, meanwhile, endure much of the residual violence and poverty caused by armed conflicts, and they bear much of the burden of rebuilding families and communities. They are often excluded, however, from both the negotiating table and the governments charged with sustaining peace. Less than 8 percent of the hundreds of peace treaties signed in the last 20 years were negotiated by delegations that included women, and according to the World Economic Forum, women hold less than 20 percent of all national decision-making positions.

One note about Verveer and trying to cover her work… A couple of years ago, in the middle of writing my book, I made a herculean effort to make a trip with Ambassador Verveer on one of her excursions abroad. Contacting the State Dept. innumerable times, never getting a definitive time for a trip, while running into a hamster wheel of assistants and non-ending non-answers, however politely they were pushing me off, I’d had enough. They won. I gave up. I’m fairly certain that if I wrote for the New York Times or even Foreign Policy this would not have happened. I was willing to travel on my own nickel, but still couldn’t get it booked. And it’s not like certain people don’t know who I am over at the State Dept.

Mona Eltahawy reminds America that the real war on women is in the Middle East.

Eltahawy’s writing for Foreign Policy’s “The Sex Issue” spectacular is causing a typing explosion on Twitter. From Shadi Hamid this morning, who is from Brookings:

How does @monaeltahawy explain the fact that the majority of Egyptian women voted for parties that don’t believe in gender equality?

I cover women around the world in my book in the chapter titled “Is Freedom Just for Women?” It’s a subject that more Americans need to engage. The freedom of women in countries around the world directly impacts U.S. aid and involvement. It’s important to note that one of the issues most important, access to reproductive services, is something the Republican party would strip from the budget, because of their phobia of contraception and simple family planning, which is so desperately needed around the world.

From Mona’s piece titled “Why Do They Hate Us?”

Foreign Policy's Sex Issue Centerfold

But let’s put aside what the United States does or doesn’t do to women. Name me an Arab country, and I’ll recite a litany of abuses fueled by a toxic mix of culture and religion that few seem willing or able to disentangle lest they blaspheme or offend. When more than 90 percent of ever-married women in Egypt — including my mother and all but one of her six sisters — have had their genitals cut in the name of modesty, then surely we must all blaspheme. When Egyptian women are subjected to humiliating “virginity tests” merely for speaking out, it’s no time for silence. When an article in the Egyptian criminal code says that if a woman has been beaten by her husband “with good intentions” no punitive damages can be obtained, then to hell with political correctness. And what, pray tell, are “good intentions”? They are legally deemed to include any beating that is “not severe” or “directed at the face.” What all this means is that when it comes to the status of women in the Middle East, it’s not better than you think. It’s much, much worse. Even after these “revolutions,” all is more or less considered well with the world as long as women are covered up, anchored to the home, denied the simple mobility of getting into their own cars, forced to get permission from men to travel, and unable to marry without a male guardian’s blessing — or divorce either.

Not a single Arab country ranks in the top 100 in the World Economic Forum’s Global Gender Gap Report, putting the region as a whole solidly at the planet’s rock bottom.

What a sumptuous dish Foreign Policy has laid out on this one.

The Aytollah Under the Bedsheets, By Karim Sadjadpour

The Startling Plight of China’s Leftover Ladies, By Christina Larson

The 25 Most Powerful Women You’ve Never Heard Of

The Bedroom State, By Joshua E. Keating (Coming if Republicans have their way.)

Fill in the Blanks, The Sex Edition

…and much more.

There's no shortage of data showing that men rule the political world: Women make up just 20 percent of the world's parliaments and constitute about 17 percent of cabinet positions. Why aren't there more women leaders, and is there any hope of change? We asked top female leaders around the world to tell us about the worst cases of sexism in politics, the biggest obstacles for aspiring female politicians, and the best ways to bring more women to the negotiating table. Presidents and vice presidents, cabinet secretaries and members of Congress answered our call -- and here's what they told us.



This column has been updated.

Read full story · Comments { 2 }

Barbra Streisand Turns 70



I cannot begin to write what Barbra Streisand meant to me growing up as an artist, performer, dancer, singer and entertainer, but especially as a young woman dreaming of a life beyond where I was born. There was film and Barbra Streisand.

When boys in my high school heard me screeching in the shower outside my window, they laughed and made fun of me for weeks. I was a bit embarrassed, because my shower singing was always ghastly, as I stretched beyond my talents as the water relaxed me and took me beyond the boundaries of my life.

What Ms. Steisand has done in her life is not only remarkable, but has made entertainment history. Some of us understood what it meant when it was Ms. Streisand who presented the Academy Award to the first female director to receive it, Kathryn Bigelow for “The Hurt Locker.”

Like many liberal women, she’s been a target of the right, while being a staunch supporter of Democrats her entire life, particularly of former Pres. Bill Clinton, though he’s certainly not the only one. She came to Pres. Obama’s aid recently, while slamming the Fourth Estate for negligence, with a slap at Susan G. Komen for playing politics with women’s health. From a piece she did on Huffington Post from February of this year:

…Journalists need to stand strong and do their job, which is to challenge candidates immediately when they are purposefully misleading the public. They should not be polite or fearful of offending someone when the truth is in question. As we continue through the primary and head toward the general election, this is crucial. Without the mainstream media’s commitment to holding candidates accountable, we have little chance of having a well-informed electorate on Election Day. And let’s look at the facts. The truth is, President Obama’s leadership on the stimulus, bringing the auto industry back from the brink of collapse, adding nearly 3.7 million private sector jobs in 23 consecutive months of job growth proves that our country is moving in the right direction. Because of the President’s policies, our economy is on the road to recovery and it’s time we start celebrating the truth.

P.S. Hooray to everyone who supported Planned Parenthood and spoke out against Susan G. Komen for the Cure, who wrongfully politicized the issue of women’s health. This week we saw how the power of grass roots activism can lead to positive change. Bravo!

I’ve chosen some lesser heard vocals, though I start with the most important; others include Streisand in French, which I love, via “Je m’appelle Barbra” (1966) that you can hear after the jump. I never had the means or opportunity to see and hear Ms. Streisand in person, my money always needed to live, but I’ve heard most everything she’s ever recorded, which was good enough for great joy. “One Night Only” is spectacular, if you haven’t heard it yet. There are so many from which to choose. Oh, and if you haven’t had the pleasure of perusing her book on living and design, it’s marvelous.

Happy Birthday 70th to Barbra Streisand.

Your life has meant so much to so many. I’m just one of them.

Biography

Actress/singer/director/writer/composer/producer/designer/author/photographer/activist Barbra Streisand is the only artist ever to receive Oscar, Tony, Emmy, Grammy, Directors Guild of America, Golden Globe, National Medal of Arts and Peabody Awards and France’s Legion d’Honneur as well as the American Film Institute’s Lifetime Achievement Award. She is also the first female film director to receive the Kennedy Center Honors.

She won Oscars for both Best Actress (“Funny Girl”) and Best Original Song (for her composition of “Evergreen” which has since become a standard.) She also was nominated for Best Actress for “The Way We Were.” The three films she directed received 14 Oscar nominations. A leading film star in dramas, comedies and musicals, her latest film, “Meet The Fockers,” became the first live-action comedy to earn over half a billion dollars and remains the highest-grossing comedy..

An eight-time Grammy Award winner who is the only performer to have number one albums in five consecutive decades, her 51 gold albums, 30 platinum and 18 multi-platinum, each of which, according to the Recording Industry Association of America, exceeds all other female singers. Only Elvis Presley has achieved more Gold albums than she. The RIAA also notes that her 71 million albums sales tops the RIAA list of album sales by a female singer. With the recent debut at #1 of her “Love Is The Answer” album, her 9th record to reach that top spot, the time-span between her first and most recent Number One albums, exceeding that of any other performer or act, is now 46 years. Her most recent album, “What Matters Most,” debuting at Number 4, was her 31st to reach the Top Ten in the ratings charts, with which she passed The Beatles to become the third highest achiever in that significant statistic, exceeded only by the Rolling Stones and Frank Sinatra.

Her civil rights activism and philanthropic pursuits are just as impressive. The Streisand Foundation has given millions of dollars in 2100 grants to non-profit organizations and she has raised many millions more through her performances.

The career of Barbra Streisand has been paved with bold, creative achievements and highlighted by a series of firsts.

For her first motion picture, “Funny Girl,” she won the 1968 Academy Award for Best Actress, the first of two Oscars.

With “Yentl” (1983,”) her first film as a director, she became the first woman ever to produce, direct, write and star in a major motion picture. “Yentl,” earned five Oscar nominations and also brought her Golden Globes for both Best Director and Best Picture.

“The Prince of Tides,” her next directorial feature, was the first motion picture directed by its female star ever to receive a Best Director nomination from the Directors Guild of America as well as seven Academy Award nominations. Barbra Streisand produced the heralded drama in addition to directing and starring in it.

She won the DGA award (Best Director Music/Variety Television Program) in 1994 for her television special, “Barbra Streisand: The Concert,” which she co-directed with Dwight Hemion.

For her very first Broadway appearance in “I Can Get It For You Wholesale,” she won the New York Drama Critics Award and received a Tony nomination.

For her very first solo recording, “The Barbra Streisand Album,” she won two 1963 Grammy Awards. One of these was for Best Female Vocal Performance. The other, Album of the Year; made her the youngest artist to have received that award.

She is the first female composer ever to win an Academy Award, this for her song, “Evergreen,” the love theme from her 1976 hit film, “A Star Is Born.” She was nominated again in 1997 as co-composer of “I Finally Found Someone,” based on her love theme for her 1996 film as director/producer/star, “The Mirror Has Two Faces.” The film achieved two Oscar nominations and the Best Supporting Actress Golden Globe for Lauren Bacall.

She is the recipient of five personal Emmy awards. Her first television special, “My Name Is Barbra” (1965,) received five Emmy Awards, including one for her for best performance, as well as the distinguished Peabody Award, the first of two. This achievement was repeated 30 years later by “Barbra Streisand: The Concert” which won two additional Emmy awards for Ms. Streisand among the five for the production. That show also was accorded the Peabody Award, the Directors Guild of America award and three CableACE awards and it became the highest-rated musical event in HBO’s history. Her 2001 television concert special, “Barbra Streisand: Timeless. Live in Concert,” also co-directed by its star, won four more Emmys, including one for Ms. Streisand’s performance. She is also an Emmy recipient in 2001 for her Barwood Films’ documentary on pioneering women directors in the early decades of motion pictures, “Reel Models: The First Women of Film.” … and much more…



Continue Reading →

Read full story · Comments { 17 }

Bill Clinton’s New Role as Pres. Obama’s ‘Campaign Whisperer’

by Pete Souza

Politico nails the headline in the most important political article of the day, penned by Glenn Thrush and Jonathan Martin.

Team Obama has finally realized that talking about Mitt Romney as not having a “core” is a loser.

Anyone who has looked at his life, which I have, knows this is well off the mark. Romney has a deep, foundational core, which can be seen in his family life, his devout commitment to Mormonism, as well as the outreach he’s done through his church, which includes helping people.

However, there is nothing in the Mormon fundamentalist faith that is liberal or even centrist. It is a staunchly conservative doctrine with defined roles for men and women that are vastly outside of how the majority of Americans live. It’s also what allows Mitt Romney to embrace the Republican far right.

This reality is masked by whatever moves meant to get him where he wants to be, with Mitt Romney’s necessity to cater to the fringe right his most vulnerable point of weakness, because the American people are not moored on the right.

Of course former Pres. Bill Clinton would know the extremes are where Romney’s vulnerable, while also offering an opportunity to hit fringe right policies trumpeted by today’s Republican Party.

From Politico’s piece today:

Barack Obama’s top advisers are making a mid-“core” correction in their attacks on Mitt Romney — with a little nudge from Bill Clinton, who is finding a niche as an Obama campaign whisperer and fundraiser.

Romney, senior advisers David Plouffe and David Axelrod intoned time and again, was a political shape-shifter who lacked any real moral or political “core.”

The slogan was the Obama talking point for months. But Clinton, echoing survey data presented by Obama’s own pollster Joel Benenson, quietly argued that the empty-core approach failed to capitalize on what they see as Romney’s greatest vulnerability: An embrace of a brand of tea party conservatism that turns off Hispanics, women and moderate independents.

Helene Cooper did a story in the New York Times on team Obama’s new strategy last week titled “In Strategy Shift, Obama Team Attacks Romney From the Left.” This is how it began:

So long, flip-flopper. Hello, right-wing extremist.

Followed by the fill-in”:

After months of depicting Mr. Romney as the ultimate squishy, double-talking, no-core soul, Team Obama is shifting gears. Senior administration officials, along with Democratic and campaign officials, all say their strategy now will be to tell the world that Mr. Romney has a core after all — and it’s deep red.

However, the Times missed former Pres. Clinton’s “campaign whisperer” role, which is the best characterization I’ve read to date on what’s been circling.

Bill Clinton’s role is critical, because there’s been no sense that Axelrod and Plouffe have gotten a clue how to run against Mitt Romney with a candidate that’s no longer about “change” and “hope” in anyone’s eyes. It begins with the lack of a campaign slogan. That there has been no mention of what Pres. Obama wants to do in his second term isn’t surprising, because if Pres. Obama came out and admitted he’s in on some form of entitlement grand bargain, his activist base would bail. It’s about defining his opponent as a choice people can’t afford to make, which is best made through Romney’s austerity penchant for the 99%, but not the 1%, with emphasis on his far right policy approach, not populism.

America’s had many wealthy presidents, but none wanted to balance the federal budget on the backs of people, which Mitt Romney telegraphs he would by embracing the Paul Ryan economic model.

“You can’t just keep changing these things around, they have to have more of consistent message or nobody will buy it,” Politico quotes veteran GOP consultant and the man who ran Jon Huntsman’s doomed campaign, John Weaver.

Considering that’s exactly what happened to Huntsman and Weaver, he learned the lesson the hard way.

Romney’s already Etch A Sketching his immigration stance, so Democrats need to get busy with their message. Mitt Romney wants to allow the government to force women to have unwanted medical procedures; he wants to tear Hispanic families apart; and double down on austerity, expecting the private sector to take over on multiple fronts, while drowning the government safety net in the oval office bathroom if he gets the chance.

Bill Clinton knows a deeply religious man like Mitt Romney, with a beautiful family, no scandal in sight, except the sin of being rich and not caring much how he did it, except to serve at the pleasure of shareholders, can’t be carved out as having no “core.” It also alienates the financial industry and big donors that the Big Dawg is now being tapped to reach, because Obama needs them to wake up.

Personal attacks also let a politician slip through the cracks on their policy extremism.

Pres. Obama wants a second term and former Pres. Bill Clinton beat Newt Gingrich at his own game, then beat back the right who tried to make a private consensual affair about something it wasn’t, utilizing what many have deemed unethical means through Kenneth Starr to do it, which was set up before Bill Clinton was in office by Chief Justice Rehnquist, something I talk about in the chapter of my book “Blaming Bill.” Yet, Bill Clinton survived to thrive.

The partnering of Barack Obama with Bill Clinton is long overdue and it could be something that will make a difference in the 8-12% of the electorate that will decide the presidency in November.

The rest will be about world events over which neither campaign or either big two parties have any control.

Read full story · Comments { 25 }

Anti-Austerity French Socialist François Hollande Thanks Dominique Strauss-Kahn

“I don’t like the rich.” – François Hollande

Well, the man who’s now facing a runoff with the President of France didn’t actually thank Dominique Strauss-Kahn, but he should have. Christopher Dickey of the Daily Beast agrees.

But Hollande got lucky. Sarkozy’s most dynamic opponent a year ago seemed sure to be former finance minister and then–International Monetary Fund managing director Dominique Strauss-Kahn. But DSK suddenly flamed out in scandals in New York and France before he ever had a chance to announce he intended to run. And once Hollande got the nomination, he made what now appears to have been the wise decision to present himself as the candidate of “normal.” Even his campaign T-shirts proclaim that bland virtue.

It’s the first time a sitting president has lost in the first round, according to the BBC.

The Socialist candidate has promised to raise taxes on big corporations and people earning more than 1m euros a year. He also wants to raise the minimum wage, hire 60,000 more teachers and lower the retirement age from 62 to 60 for some workers.

Lowering the retirement age, however, is just plain irresponsible.

The far-right wing is in “shock,” with the turnout around 80%, because the French seem to want Sarkozy out.

Somewhere François Mitterrand is smiling.

That François Hollande is now the first from the French Socialist party to get this close to the presidency since Mitterand is due to two primary events. The unpopularity of current French President Nicolas Sarkozy, and the libidinous lechery of Dominique Strauss-Kahn, former head of the International Monetary Fund whose arrogant idiocy has gotten him entangled in sex scandals in the last year, which should have been a campaign year for him. Nothing yet from Anne Sinclair in the English edition of HuffPost, who is not only Strauss-Kahn’s wife, but the editor of Huffington Post’s French edition.

The Financial Times has a profile of François Hollande, which is free to read after registering.

Hollande promises “fiscal discipline, but plans to raise spending and taxes,” as well as tackle Sarkozy’s pension reforms.

I wonder how Dominique Strauss-Kahn will soothe himself after blowing the chance to be president of France. It all started going down hill because he allegedly couldn’t keep his hands off a hotel maid.

Sex and France go together like Scotch and ice. It’s just that it gets a little creepy when headlines start blaring about a one-percenter who wants to be the next French president can’t keep his sexual exploits out of the international press.

Read full story · Comments { 5 }

Beyond Timothy Leary and Valley of the Dolls: Psychedelic Drugs and Healing in the 21st Century

“Rick Doblin has done a lot for the field, but he is more of a populist,” Grob says. “We need careful and controlled scientific studies showing the efficacy of these drugs so funding can continue.” Broader awareness of these sorts of end-of-life psychedelic studies could be good for everyone, the researchers say. “If insurance companies knew about our outcomes, they might get a lot more interested in what we’re doing here.” Griffiths continued: “When you make people less afraid to die, then they’re less likely to cling to life at a huge cost to society. After having such a transcendent experience, individuals with terminal illness often show a markedly reduced fear of dying and no longer feel the need to aggressively pursue every last medical intervention available. Instead they become more interested in the quality of their remaining life as well as the quality of their death.” – How Psychedelic Drugs Can Help Patients Face Death, by Lauren Slater

It’s the 21st century, but enlightenment is a long way away.

We were better off and on the launching pad to a higher plain back in the 1960s. Even Richard Nixon believed in national health care and that was over 4 decades ago.

You’ve got to wonder when America will ever grow up. Watching the current bottom-feeder generation of politicians, it doesn’t look like it will be anytime soon.

Candidate Obama promised to keep a hands off policy on medical marijuana outlets. His alter ego, Pres. Obama, has done the opposite.

From Rolling Stone in February 2012, Obama’s War on Pot:

…Back when he was running for president in 2008, Barack Obama insisted that medical marijuana was an issue best left to state and local governments. “I’m not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws on this issue,” he vowed, promising an end to the Bush administration’s high-profile raids on providers of medical pot, which is legal in 16 states and the District of Columbia.

But over the past year, the Obama administration has quietly unleashed a multi­agency crackdown on medical cannabis that goes far beyond anything undertaken by George W. Bush. The feds are busting growers who operate in full compliance with state laws, vowing to seize the property of anyone who dares to even rent to legal pot dispensaries, and threatening to imprison state employees responsible for regulating medical marijuana. With more than 100 raids on pot dispensaries during his first three years, Obama is now on pace to exceed Bush’s record for medical-marijuana busts. “There’s no question that Obama’s the worst president on medical marijuana,” says Rob Kampia, executive director of the Marijuana Policy Project. “He’s gone from first to worst.”

It’s not all that surprising, but is just another example of the untrustworthy nature of politicians, Barack Obama just being the latest among them.

There is no medical reason to keep marijuana out of the hands of the sick or dying.

What this is about is money.

There isn’t a national politician today who will man the line against moneyed interests on behalf of we the people. Neither Barack Obama or Mitt Romney would dare, both of whom are fueled by the same elite few who control the levers of financial power.

The same reason Pres. Obama did a back room deal with big Pharma, as well as private insurance companies, on health care. It comes down to the issue of no vision, no courage, no larger concept of health care beyond 20th century medicine that is stuck in antiquated means of treating symptoms, while never going beyond, which should include offering a better quality of living for the sick.

I talked about my own journey through an athletic injury recently for Zocalo Public Square, when I utilized a trio of alternative therapies to navigate stratospheric pain, with acupuncture finally showing me the way up and out. None of the alternative avenues were covered by health insurance.

“Sugar Blues” was written decades ago, yet it was some sort of scandal that “60 Minutes” recently did a report that sugar kills. This is not news. We’re stuck on stupid where our own health is concerned, because people won’t even accept that much of it depends on our own lifestyle, behavior and actions.

Doctors aren’t trained on nutrition and prevention, because there’s no money in it. Women face the same challenges with doctors at mid-life, with bio-identical hormones a mystery to most doctors, while being out of reach for many and not covered by insurance. But they offer a sparkling way through the toughest life gateway a girl faces, which threatens her very sexual nature. It’s not a coincidence that marriages falter when women are going through the thunder road hormone journey, while men are desperately clinging to their flagging machismo. Men face similar struggles, but as easy as it is for them to get Viagra, testosterone cremes are equally available.

However, these life chapters are separate from life threatening illnesses or terminal diagnoses.

The first step out of this hamster wheel is medical marijuana. But people actually still believe marijuana is a gateway drug, with infotainment cable shows parroting popular anecdotes made for people who are scared of their own shadows. Gateway drug hocus-pocus is the most preposterously ignorant assumption the uninformed weed trackers have today.

Remember when Rep. Ron Paul was made a laughing stock for his comment on heroin? He was on to something about personal liberties and drugs, with legalization and regulation the answer, even if heroin isn’t the most effective example, unless you’re recovering from invasive surgery and you’re in the hospital and need to mask the post-op pain. We need someone with the courage of Ron Paul, but who also has the integrity of a liberal to acknowledge libertarianism in the modern age also requires a government safety net, because of the corrupt nature of the global economy and concentrated wealth. Someone who is equally respectful that women’s individual liberties cannot be abridged by either ideology, religiosity or out of convenience.

Now comes a fascinating and enlightened article in the New York Times

Grob and his colleagues are part of a resurgence of scientific interest in the healing power of psychedelics. Michael Mithoefer, for instance, has shown that MDMA is an effective treatment for severe P.T.S.D. Halpern has examined case studies of people with cluster headaches who took LSD and reported their symptoms greatly diminished. And psychedelics have been recently examined as treatment for alcoholism and other addictions.

Despite the promise of these investigations, Grob and other end-of-life researchers are careful about the image they cultivate, distancing themselves as much as possible from the 1960s, when psychedelics were embraced by many and used in a host of controversial studies, most famously the psilocybin project run by Timothy Leary. Grob described the rampant drug use that characterized the ’60s as “out of control” and said of his and others’ current research, “We are trying to stay under the radar. We want to be anti-Leary.” Halpern agreed. “We are serious sober scientists,” he told me.

Being “anti-Leary” is always the first step, because if you aren’t take seriously the game is over. As an anti-Leary libertarian, though his philosophy is misogynistic, that’s one thing Ron Paul offered that scared so many zombie Republicans and Democrats, though he remains naive that a safety net in the modern era isn’t foundational to a humane society.

Time Magazine did a story on ecstasy back in 2000, with a section tucked into it that pointed to the same types of properties the Times article is pointing to today.

Sue Stevens, the woman who took it in 1997 with her husband Shane–he has since died of kidney cancer–learned about the drug from a mutual friend of hers and Doblin’s. She believes e helped Shane find the right attitude to fight his illness, and she helps Doblin advocate for limited legal use. Soon his association will help fund the first approved study of MDMA in psychotherapy, involving 30 victims of rape in Spain diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder. In this country, the FDA has approved only one study. In 1995 Dr. Charles Grob, a ucla psychiatrist, used it as a pain reliever for end-stage cancer patients. In the first phase of the study, he concluded the drug is safe if used in controlled situations under careful monitoring.

Raves, dance clubs and the drinking crowd have taken the healing properties of drugs like ecstasy and MDMA, even marijuana, out of the health equation and put the marketing in the hands of establishment fogies, big Pharma, the government and politicians who don’t care about quality of life for people in the throes of dealing with their own mental crises, and even their very mortality. These same people hounded Dr. Kervorkian through the end of his life, even if all he was doing is helping adults manage their own passing, the most personal of decisions.

The story in the Times is important. It talks about alternative medicine and healing when dealing with the most humbling moments of our life.

When you look at our politics, however, whether it’s Barack Obama or Mitt Romney, as well as the people elected to Congress, there’s absolutely no evidence that an enlightenment epiphany is on the horizon. There is no one with the ethical fortitude to speak for people facing life-shattering illnesses or their own mortality, helping them get options beyond the conventional, which offer no relief in the process of healing or death, let alone a quality of life that allows a person to go out with dignity and grace, with a little laughter on the side.

Read full story · Comments { 9 }

ABC’s GMA Releases Photo Believed to Be Bloodied Head of George Zimmerman

“I am sorry for the loss of your son. I did not know how old he was. I thought he was a little bit older than I was,” Zimmerman said addressing Martin’s family directly. – ABC News

video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

When George Zimmerman chose to pursue Trayvon Martin, a series of events were set into motion that included a scuffle between the two men that ended in the teen’s death and Zimmerman being hit hard enough that his head became bloodied. The result is why the 911 dispatch operator specifically told George Zimmerman not to track Trayvon Martin in the first place.

In a hearing today, the judge ruled that George Zimmerman could be freed on $150,000 bond, but would be required to wear an electronic tracking device. However, Zimmerman will not be freed today, with meetings set on parameters of his bail release, including whether he can leave the state.

“Good Morning America” host Robin Roberts admitted that ABC can’t conclusively prove this photo is legitimate, but the network is sure enough to blast the photo out to their audience and stand by it.

Dan Abrams, who founded Mediaite, gave a thorough legal analysis on ABC, where he now works. Partial transcript via Mediaite:

“Even if George Zimmerman was injured in his fight,” said Abrams, “it doesn’t change the fact that the prosecutors clearly believe that Zimmerman was the aggressor. And if Zimmerman was the aggressor and they got into a fight, that doesn’t allow him to use deadly force. It simply — you can’t be losing a fight and then decide to use your gun to protect yourself.”

If Zimmerman doesn’t pursue, regardless that he was carrying a legally concealed carry weapon in a state where Stand Your Ground is the law, there is no altercation and Trayvon Martin isn’t killed.

Bill Cosby made a statement this week that this isn’t about race it’s about guns. It sounds to me like a statement from someone who doesn’t own a firearm. I say this because we do and I’ve had this debate with people who don’t.

Cosby’s statement begs the question, if Trayvon Martin was white, would George Zimmerman have followed him, suspecting something suspicious? Or are people going to once again contend it’s all about the hoodie?

This post has been updated.

Read full story · Comments { 144 }

Ousted Secret Service Agent ‘Really Checking Out’ Sarah Palin

This puts a whole new meaning to the not so secret Secret Service motto, “wings up, rings off.”

The Washington Post identified David Randall Chaney, the Secret Service supervisor who was ousted in the Columbian prostitute scandal.

The UK Daily Mail has a blizzard of photos of him enjoying the ladies, one of which was Sarah Palin, when he was guarding her in 2008.

Sarah responds with a Trumpism, “Well, check this out, bodyguard, you’re fired.”

Read full story · Comments { 2 }

LA Times Right to Publish Damning Afghan Photos

There is no question that publishing the photos of the Army 82nd Airborne posing with body parts of dead Afghanistan militants was the right thing to do.

It’s predictable that SecDef Leon Panetta would cite blowback as a reason to refrain, but there is too much secrecy in what the U.S. does through our military as it is. The contagion of events inside Afghanistan, from the Quran burning to the murderous rampage of a U.S. soldier recently, to the photos, proves we are not only in over our head, but we’ve lost control of the U.S. mission to the point of unraveling our own integrity and ethical purpose.

From the LA Times, who felt compelled to explain their job:

“We considered this very carefully,” Maharaj said. “At the end of the day, our job is to publish information that our readers need to make informed decisions. We have a particular duty to report vigorously and impartially on all aspects of the American mission in Afghanistan. On balance, in this case, we felt that the public interest here was served by publishing a limited, but representative sample of these photos, along with a story explaining the circumstances under which they were taken.”

… “The two photos published were chosen because they clearly and unambiguously depict conduct that the Army described as inappropriate. In examining the full set of images, we set aside others on grounds of taste, relevance or repetitiousness. Some were too gruesome. Others were very similar to the two images already chosen or were difficult to interpret,” he said.

It seems the American public has a huge appetite for the trivial, but when it comes to the serious, like the wars we are waging, we’d rather just close our eyes, because it’s all too horrible.

Our society hasn’t even begun to process the cost of rehabilitation and long-term care of the veterans coming back from Afghanistan. In America, war is something that happens in an alternate universe that is driven by partisanship.

It makes it easier for the fearmongers to squeal about the ludicrous charges that Pres. Obama is “weak” on North Korea, Iran or whatever national security fantasy they can concoct for the ideologically besotted and proudly ignorant.

Read full story · Comments { 6 }

‘Kennedys of China’ Engulfed in Money Murder Mystery and Political Scandal

We can marvel over Bo’s downfall. We can go on about how China’s leadership refuses to countenance rising political stars who challenge its clubby world. We can engage in whodunit fantasies about the wife and the dead businessman. But more than anything, this tale shows how an antiquated political system imperils a nation’s future.Bloomberg News

Bo Xilai, the former Communist Party chief in Chongqing, was once seen as a high-flyer tipped for top office. But he has been sacked and his wife is being investigated in connection with the death of a British businessman. – Bo Xilai scandal: Timeline (from the BBC)

The police chief Wang Lijun is afraid of Communist Party boss Bo Xilai, who he’s investigating, so he flees to the American consulate in Chengdu, near Chongqing, then is talked to into leaving consulate, only to be whisked away, with China officials telling the tale that Wang is getting “holiday-style medical treatment,” but he’s actually being held against his will, though no one seems to know where.

In mid-March Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao throws Bo Xilai under the bus in public signaling Beijing is coming for him.

Now a second Politburo member, the security boss Zhou Yongkang who was seen as Bo’s ally, is under scrutiny, with the AP reporting this development is only widening the scandal and confirming chaos inside China’s Communist party ruling elite.

Oh, and did I forget to mention it’s because of allegations that a British businessman was poisoned by the wife of Mr. Bo who is, now was, the leading Communist Party rising star, because he was going to expose her efforts to move her cash around, something that is considered an almost treasonous no-no in China? Meanwhile, the family of the deceased Brit denies there was anything amiss before his death.

That’s just for starters.

If you haven’t been following this tawdry China thriller threatening to expose the Communist Party there drip by dishy drip you need to catch up before the film gets made.

Start with the New York Times reporting from around a week ago. Nicholas Kristof was on CBS “This Morning”, with Charlie Rose, as well as Erica Hill, yesterday reporting on the scandal.

Leading characters being the now deceased Neil Heywood, along with Bo Xilai and his wife, Gu Kailai, and an orderly, as well as their spoiled son Bo Guagua, who’s had fancy upper crust schooling, even if his father’s salary couldn’t cover the bills.

All hell broke loose when Bo Xilai’s wife Gu Kailai was arrested for Neil Heywood’s murder recently. Bo’s power was growing politically, as has been his wealth over years, which threatened Beijing, so there’s all sorts of rumors about a frame up, as well as the goal being to neuter Bo’s rise.

That they’ve done.

The Politburo simultaneously suspended Bo Xilai, whose father was a founder of the Chinese Communist party, from the Central Committee for “serious discipline violations.” According to reports, the power couple known as the “Kennedy’s of China” haven’t been seen since mid-March.

From the UK Telegraph, from April 10:

The statement also said that the crime had been brought to light by Wang Lijun, the former police chief in the city.

Mr Wang fled from Chongqing to the US Consulate in neighbouring Chengdu earlier this year, apparently in fear for his safety.

While inside the US consulate, he accused Mrs Gu of poisoning Heywood, prompting the Foreign Office to urge the Chinese authorities to reopen the case.
According to the New York Times, Mr Wang provided American diplomats with “a technical police file” on Heywood’s death, as well as divulging a “trove of knowledge on the contest for power among the Chinese leadership”.

China’s political dirty laundry being aired in public is humiliating, but that it’s tied to a murder is explosive. It also makes for tremendous international dirt, made richer by gossip, innuendo and accusations of the Chinese political 1% wanting to get rid of someone who threatened them.

From the BBC yesterday:

But the scandal – China’s biggest in years – comes ahead of a leadership change in Beijing due to get under way in October. Some suspect that the party are using legal procedures as a pretext for a purge, our correspondent says. In political cases – such as this one – it is the Communist Party and not the courts that makes the decisions, our correspondent adds.

Britain, meanwhile, has called on China to carry out a full investigation free of interference.

Prime Minister David Cameron raised the case with Chinese politburo member Li Changchun on Tuesday when they met at Downing Street, offering “any necessary assistance” to help China investigate the death.

Read full story · Comments { 2 }

2012 has Officially Gone to the Dogs

I’ve not jumped aboard the inane conversation about Seamus on a car roof, except to long ago write that it had shamefully occurred. But the barking has reached epic levels.

Dogs would call their lawyers if they could, defamation the charge.

The 2012 presidential election season is shaping up to be the un-serious, distracted and preoccupied spectacle America deserves. No wonder people don’t vote, don’t tune in and can be easily manipulated by lies.

I love Jon Stewart, but now everyone is competing to be him.

The Daily Caller has now answered the Seamus dog charges from Democrats, which they think are so clever. It’s much to the relief of all hang dog Republicans, numbering in the thousands now that Romney is the nominee.

“With Lolo, I learned how to eat small green chill peppers raw with dinner (plenty of rice), and, away from the dinner table, I was introduced to dog meat (tough), snake meat (tougher), and roasted grasshopper (crunchy). Like many Indonesians, Lolo followed a brand of Islam that could make room for the remnants of more ancient animist and Hindu faiths. He explained that a man took on the powers of whatever he ate: One day soon, he promised, he would bring home a piece of tiger meat for us to share.”

Yep, that’s Barack Obama, writing about his childhood with his stepfather Lolo Soetoro in Indonesia, from Chapter Two of his bestseller Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance.

Who could have predicted needing to eat dog meat would be a punchline?

Jake Tapper took the bait in Romney Campaign Notes that Obama as a Boy Ate Dog Meat.

Democrats have signaled they have every intention of making sure the American people — especially dog-lovers — know the tale. In January, senior Obama campaign strategist David Axelrod tweeted a photo of the president and Bo in a car, with the snide observation: “@davidaxelrod: How loving owners transport their dogs.”

The Romney campaign signaled Tuesday night that they are not about to cede any ground when it comes to a candidate’s odd past with man’s best friend.

Dogs Against Romney has been around since the Seamus on the car roof story broke.

Today, James Taranto couldn’t help himself any longer.

Obama vs. Romney is shaping up to be exactly what I said it would be: a theatrical farce. A mirror on the American political establishment, which is as bankrupt and incapable of focusing on what matters to We the People, but also exactly what voters have earned, because they’re too busy texting their choice for winner on “American Idol” to give a flying fig who’s running our country into the ground.

It’s not big government, because nobody’s doing anything on either side, but crafting their next tweet or political parody.

Democrats and Republicans, making more Independents every day, but we still don’t have anyone worth voting for, only someone to vote against.

Read full story · Comments { 18 }

Super PACS and Sesame Street: Court OKs Political Ads on Public Broadcasting

Joyce L. Arnold, Liberally Independent, Queer Talk, equality activist, writer.

Isn’t that exciting news? While watching Sesame Street or The News Hour, or listening to Morning Edition or The Thistle and Shamrock, you may be treated to the same political ads that commercial broadcasters air. Actually, maybe PACS and campaigns would tweak the ads. That could be interesting, to see what marketers come up with for public station audiences as compared to what they design for commercial station audiences.

This court decision (a panel vote, of 2-1) was announced last week. From Free Press:

Free Press Urges Public Broadcasters to Reject Attack Ads

On Thursday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down a ban on political advertising on public television and radio stations. The court said that permitting this type of advertising would not threaten or undermine the educational nature of public broadcast stations. It upheld the ban on advertising by commercial and for-profit companies.

Wait. Bans on advertising by “for-profits” are still banned? Then how on earth could political candidates of the Duopoly be free to run ads? Same for Super PACS, and Democratic and Republican party ads. All are, in fact, as much for-profits as say, BP or Bank of America. But then, since corporations are people, and so can donate as much money as they want to political campaigns, wouldn’t they already have the right to run political ads anyway? Deciding when a corporation is a “person” and when it’s a “for-profit” seems to require a good bit of legislative and court definitions and rulings.

Free Press President and CEO Craig Aaron made the following statement:

‘Polluting public broadcasting with misleading and negative political ads is not in keeping with the original vision of noncommercial broadcasting. And it’s certainly not the solution to funding public media.

‘At a time when people are turning to public broadcasting to get away from the flood of nasty attack ads, viewers don’t want to see Sesame Street being brought to them by shadowy Super PACs.’

Or maybe not even that “shadowy.” They have no worries, these Super PACS. They know when they’re a business and when they’re a person, because they tell the legislators, and increasingly, apparently the courts as well, how to define each.

So the kids watching Zoom or Postcards from Buster or the Electric Company might be treated to a smiling Mitt and/or Barack, surrounded by a group of carefully diverse and photogenic kids. I wonder, would it trickier, or easier, to run ads during Democracy Project? And Sid the Science Kid – that could be really interesting, to see what a Republican Super PAC, in particular, would do with the subject of science.

From another Free Press piece:

NPR and PBS: Just Say No

While the Justice Department reviews the court’s decision, Free Press is urging NPR and PBS to reject these ads outright. And some stations have already taken a stand.

KPBS in San Diego has stated that it will not accept political advertising on its station. ‘It’s not our intention to make money off elections via political advertising — rather, KPBS will remain committed to educating the voters.’

That’s another point, isn’t it? Given cuts in funding and struggles in general, this will surely look very tempting to some, maybe many, public broadcasters.

A Reuters’ report included a quote from Norman Ornstein, “resident scholar” at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. Interestingly, Ornstein doesn’t like the ruling, saying

… the decision could ‘fundamentally change the character of public television and radio’ … .

‘This is just going to move us further away from what remains of a public square. … To be truthful, it scares me to death.’

“Public squares,” figuratively and literally, are moving in the privatized direction. Commercialization follows. Well, it actually leads, of course, but we aren’t supposed to talk about that.

Of course, it isn’t as if public broadcasting hasn’t already undergone some “fundamentally change of character” kind of transitions. This court ruling is just a more blatant step in that same general direction of 1% control. Like Citizens United. “(For profit) Corporations are people” really means the handful of people at the top get to spend money to help insure their preferences become the law of the land. With this recent ruling – and if it’s upheld – we now know that “Corporations are the public,” too.

Read full story · Comments { 6 }

Army 82nd Airborne Pose with Afghan Bomber Body Parts

U.S. troops posed with body parts of Afghan bombers

An American soldier says he released the photos to the Los Angeles Times to draw attention to the safety risk of a breakdown in leadership and discipline. The Army has started a criminal investigation.

via the Los Angeles Times

We have a breakdown and it started some time ago.

George W. Bush was in charge when the worst military scandal since the Vietnam My Lai Massacre happened at Abu Ghraib. That his Administration was responsible for war crimes under the Geneva Conventions will never be proven, but that they occurred few of us doubt. It was under Bush that our military standards for recruitment had to be lowered, because the multiple tours were destroying our military.

Gen. Stanley McChyrstal and his elite staff were humiliated through hubris in a Rolling Stone interview that got one of the most talented military men in modern history deservedly sacked.

The Secret Service gets caught with prostitutes because they wanted a 2-for-1 deal and were too cheap to pay the girls their rate.

Something’s gone terribly wrong in our military industrial complex, which is not news, but it has become so wide, deep and secretive that control is no longer an option.

Read full story · Comments { 13 }

Juan Cole on Iran and U.S. Embargo

**updated**

“These are the most crippling sanctions that have been placed on any country since the case of Iraq in the 1990s. …the U.S. is now engaged in a blockade of Iranian petroleum…. – Juan Cole on “The Alonya Show”

Speaking of Iran, the ultimate insider on Iran David Ignatius writes about the Iranian nuclear talks today:

The nuclear talks with Iran have just begun, but already the smart money in Tehran is betting on a deal. That piece of intelligence comes from the Tehran stock index; the day after the talks opened, it posted its largest daily rise in months and closed at a record high.

Tehran investors may be guilty of wishful thinking in their eagerness for an agreement that would ease the economic sanctions squeezing their country. My guess is that they probably have it right. So far, Iran is following the script for a gradual, face-saving exit from a nuclear program that even Russia and China have signaled is too dangerous. …

The Iranians seem to be preparing their public for a deal that limits enrichment while preserving the right to enrich. In an interview Monday with the Iranian student news agency, Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi explained that “making 20 percent fuel is our right,” but that “if they guarantee that they will provide us with the different levels of enriched fuel that we need, then that would be another issue.” Salehi seemed to be reviving a 2009 Turkish plan to export Iran’s low-enriched uranium abroad, and receive back 20 percent fuel for its Tehran research reactor, supposedly to make the isotopes. That earlier deal collapsed because of opposition from Khamenei, who apparently is now ready to bargain.

… Translation: The Iranians expect to be paid, in “step-by-step” increments, as they move toward a deal. At a minimum, they will want a delay of the U.S. and European sanctions that take full effect June 28 and July 1, respectively. That timetable gives the West leverage, too — to keep the threatened sanctions in place until the Iranians have made the required concessions. It’s a well-prepared negotiation, in other words, and it seems likely to succeed if each side keeps to the script and doesn’t muff its lines.

Read full story · Comments { 1 }

Sara Ganim Beats Out the Boys for Pulitzer on Sandusky Story

She loves the crime beat. Now she’s got a 2012 Pulitzer Prize for Local Reporting to show for it.

Working harder than everyone else is what it takes, especially when you’re a 24 year-old reporter.

From the Daily Beast:

Sara Ganim was standing in her pink socks in the office of the Harrisburg, Pa., Patriot-News when she heard the news Monday. The 24-year-old crime reporter, who beat the nation’s sports journalists to the scoop of the year, the Jerry Sandusky sex scandal, had become one of the youngest-ever recipients of a Pulitzer Prize. It was the first ever for the 157-year-old Patriot-News.

[...] While speaking with a source in 2009 for a Centre Daily Times story she says can’t remember now, Ganim wound up the interview by asking if there was anything else she should know about. “Well, actually a boy just came forward to the police and alleged sex crimes against Jerry Sandusky,” the source replied.

Vaguely familiar with the name, Ganim scrawled it on a sticky note on her computer monitor, thinking to herself that she’d Google it the next day. She wound up combing through online message boards where Penn State fans and alumni shared rumors no one wanted to believe about the retired assistant coach’s relationship with young boys. She went door to door, asking people if they’d heard anything about Sandusky, seeking interviews, looking to nail down the hard facts.

By March 2011 she’d gathered enough information to piece together a front-page story reporting that Sandusky was the subject of a grand-jury investigation. Such proceedings are secret in Pennsylvania, and Ganim relied on anonymous quotations from five people close to the case who told her that the investigation had been proceeding for about a year and a half.

Way to go, Ms. Ganim.

Read full story · Comments { 0 }

Michelle Obama’s Quote

“Because I am so in. I am so in. I am going to be working so hard. We have an amazing story to tell. This President has brought us out of the dark and into the light.” – Mrs. Obama, Campaign Event – Nashville, Tennessee

First Lady Michelle Obama views The Slave Pen exhibit while touring the National Underground Railroad Freedom Center in Cincinnati, Ohio, Feb. 23, 2012. Pictured, from left, are: Dina Bailey, Associate Curator of the National Underground Railroad Freedom Center; Cincinnati Mayor Mark Mallory; Verna Williams; and Allison Singleton. (White House Photo by Sonya N. Hebert)

Resurrecting the feeling of 2008 will be near to impossible, but First Lady Michelle Obama proved good to her word, campaigning for her husband in a way she once rejected. But the job of first lady is now something she wears effortlessly, which can be seen most fully in her campaign for military families, which she talked about on Monday on NPR.

Today in Tennessee, however, it was a spiritual story she was telling.

“And we are blessed to have him. (Applause.)

“We are so blessed. (Applause.)…”

This isn’t a mere trifle for Mrs. Obama, with everything I’ve read pointing to the sincere belief she has that Barack Obama is an extraordinary man meant to do things that matter. That’s a foundational belief of Michelle Obama, according to reporting about her and her husband’s job as president. There is also a meaningful connection to being the first African American inside the White House, which was built by slaves and whose domestic staff used to be slaves as well. Rep. Gary Ackerman has written Pres. Obama, calling on him to acknowledge and honor the slave history of the White House, which was reported by The Grio.

Mrs. Obama’s quote immediately rattled Republican cages.

From Paul Bedard of the Washington Examiner:

First lady Michelle Obama hit the campaign trail again Tuesday, preaching the Gospel of Barack and telling a Nashville fundraiser that the nation is lucky to have him at the helm.

Daniel Harper of the Weekly Standard cites the religiosity he sees in the message of the First Lady.

The crowd of nearly 450 folks applauded as the first lady likened her husband to a Jesus-like figure.

There will be a lot more on this from the Fox News faithful, bet on it.

Read full story · Comments { 64 }

Hillary Having Fun: Embarrassment or Political Plot?

Is Hillary Clinton becoming an embarrassment as Secretary of State?

At least her arms were covered and she wasn’t showing cleavage!

The headline above is from the UK Telegraph, accompanied by this from Nile Gardiner after the Getty photo of Hillary having fun made a splash.

The overwhelmingly liberal US media is treating the story as a bit of fun, with the usually austere Mrs Clinton seen as letting her hair down. But I suspect that a lot of US taxpayers will see it differently – as a senior government official having a jolly time on an official overseas junket at taxpayers’ expense. And this was hardly a display of good judgment at a time when nearly 13 million Americans are unemployed, and US soldiers are laying their lives on the line every day in Afghanistan. In an effortless display of leading from behind, Hillary was partying in Colombia while the Taliban were about to launch a wave of terror attacks in Kabul.

If Gardiner had his way, Secy. Clinton would be in a constant state of mourning wearing widow black, because I seriously doubt there isn’t some catastrophe somewhere in the world weighing on her mind by the minute.

The bookend idiocy to Gardiner is Politico’s Burns and Haberman opining that the photo showing Hillary cutting loose would “play well” for 2016.

Clinton letting her hair down is the kind of thing that would play well in that presidential run in 2016 that some of her supporters have suddenly started talking about in the last few weeks.

At this stage Secy. doesn’t need to play anything well, because she actually does her job well.

No wonder Hillary keeps saying she won’t ever run again.

Read full story · Comments { 6 }

Team Obama Mines Mitt ‘Secrecy,’ Gets Clinton Treatment on Mormon ‘Dog Whistle’

David Axelrod starts mining Mitt Romney’s penchant for “secrecy. From Mike Allen’s Playbook today:

David Axelrod tells us the Obama campaign will make a major umbrella issue of what he calls “Romney’s penchant for secrecy”… “Harkening back to my youth, which extends far beyond yours, there was a show called, ‘I’ve Got A Secret.’ Increasingly, I think that would be the appropriate title for the Romney campaign. There are central issues, but this is a disturbing one and it goes to that question of, like, ‘Who is this guy? What does he stand for? What does he believe? What do we know about him?’”

This has got to be infuriating for Axe.

Never mind that candidate Barack Obama couldn’t answer these very same questions in 2007-08. It’s ironic that David Axelrod is having trouble getting his hands around the Romney strategy, which has used the Obama template from the start to secure the nomination.

A big part that answers the question has to do with Mitt Romney’s Mormonism. The GOP tells him what I did: embrace his Mormonism.

Fat chance with the media waiting in the wings for Obama reelect to play the Mormon card, which Politico has gone out of their way to mention.

Today, Mike Allen and Jon Meacham went further on “Morning Joe.” Is Axelrod’s “secrecy” a dog whistle for Mormonism?

Panelist Jon Meacham asked whether any of the focus on Romney’s “secrecy” may have something to do with his faith, Mormonism, a religion shrouded in mystery for many non-Mormons. “Is this code for the secrecy of the Mormon Church?” he asked Allen. …

“As the Obama campaign makes the case that Romney is somehow weird, different,” Allen replied, “some supporters of Romney will say that that is a dog whistle, that is a way to come near the religion issue. The Obama campaign will tell you they’re not going to touch it, they don’t poll on it, they don’t talk about it in focus groups because they know that it would blow up if they did and that got public.”

Wonder how team Obama feels about getting the Clinton treatment? It can’t be too comfortable with the media hitting you on innuendo and gossip from insiders, whether you’re actually doing what’s being openly speculated about or not.

Perhaps it’s about depressing the vote among conservative evangelicals.

“You can’t go into the temple, right? [...] Not even on the West Side? You go to Salt Lake, and I’m like, ‘Oh, that’s pretty, I want to go in.’ And they are like, ‘No, you’re Southern Baptist.’” – Joe Scarborough

Question is, when Axelrod says “secrecy,” do religious conservatives think Mormonism and if they do will they stay home?

Read full story · Comments { 10 }

Mitt Romney Fundraiser Whispers, Floats ‘Republican DREAM Act’

“It was my early birthday present for someone to be critical of me as a mother, and that was really a defining moment, and I loved it.” – Ann Romney

Today is Ann Romney’s birthday and she’s been celebrating since the mama gaffe heard ’round the world.

The quote above came at Mitt Romney’s closed-door fundraiser, which offered an opportunity to tease what his plans are if he can beat Obama in November.

Romney also went into greater detail than he has on the campaign trail in describing how he would maintain the progressive structure in the tax code after implementing his 20 percent across-the-board tax cut.

Democrats have argued that Romney’s tax proposals would disproportionately help the wealthy, but on Sunday, Romney identified specific loopholes and deductions for the wealthy that he would eliminate in order to both finance his tax cut, and ensure that the nation’s top earners face the same tax burden they do today.

“I’m going to probably eliminate for high income people the second home mortgage deduction,” Romney said, adding that he would also likely eliminate deductions for state income and property taxes as well.

“By virtue of doing that, we’ll get the same tax revenue, but we’ll have lower rates,” Romney explained. …

Democrats are complaining specifics were in short supply. It’s silly, because as people found out with Barack Obama, what people say in the campaign season often recedes when the politician is faced with real job realities.

Romney has managed to get his campaign down to two priorities, “jobs and kids.”

“I’m asked — how do you boil it down, how do you encapsulate this into a campaign message: Two things, jobs and kids,” Romney said, explaining that restarting job growth and preserving a better future for the next generation were the campaign’s guiding principles.

Can Pres. Obama boil his campaign down to two specifics?

Romney also praised Fox News Channel, calling them the network of “true believers,” while anchors in the wider TV universe “tend to be liberal.” But the campaign clearly understands that online he has an even playing field: “Where we are ahead or even is on twitter and on the Internet.”

The big news, as I read what occurred, came on immigration. Considering Romney’s primary message, his statements offer his first stab at rebranding on a critical issue for Republicans.

Romney said the GOP must offer its own policies to woo Hispanics, including a “Republican DREAM Act,” referring to the legislative proposal favored by Democrats that would offer illegal immigrants a limited path to citizenship, to give Hispanic voters a real choice between parties.

Etch a Sketch moment or not, it’s a pivot Republicans have to make, so it’s no surprise. It’s not like conservatives are going to vote for Barack Obama, but the fever swamp base of the GOP won’t like it.

But right now, both campaigns are very busy in the battle of the broads, each side making his case who is better for women. On civil liberties issues, Democrats win easily, but that’s not Romney specific. Republicans simply don’t respect women’s individual freedoms, though as we saw with Michele Bachmann they have no problem pandering on them. Romney’s campaign said he wouldn’t touch the Ledbetter Act, but would he have signed it if he was president? We’ll never know. Democrats want to paint Mitt Romney as anti-women on economics, but they’ll need some actual evidence before anyone will believe that one.

Chris Hayes tried to begin that work, finding a comment from Romney about welfare and working.

“I wanted to increase the work requirement,” Romney said. “I said, for instance, that even if you have a child two years of age, you need to go to work. And people said, ‘Well that’s heartless,’ and I said ‘No, no, I’m willing to spend more giving daycare to allow those parents to go back to work. It’ll cost the state more providing that daycare, but I want the individuals to have the dignity of work.’”

Bill Clinton can feel candidate Romney’s pain.

Read full story · Comments { 9 }