TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Tag Archives | Michelle Obama

Taylor Marsh Authors The Hillary Effect – Politics, Sexism and the Destiny of Loss

Due out in November. Available on Amazon.com, on your Kindle, Barnes & Noble, Nook, and iPad.

Spanning nearly two decades of American politics, The Hillary Effect is the provocative and insightful story of the first viable female presidential candidate in history to win a primary and do so in spite of her campaign team’s mistakes. And the galvanizing impact that her loss represented for both women and men, in and out of Washington. It revolves around media coverage that treated her differently as first lady, senator and then presidential candidate – not only because she was a woman, but because she was Hillary Clinton.

Candidly written by veteran political analyst, Taylor Marsh, it is the view from a recovering partisan, someone who the Washington Post called a “die hard Clintonite” in their profile of her in 2008.
The Hillary Effect began when Hillary, as first lady, dared to challenge China’s treatment of women. A countless number of women have and will benefit from her presidential loss, the most famous being Sarah Palin (the Tea Party queen of 2010 and first female on a national Republican presidential ticket), who weaves throughout this story as the anti-Hillary. The Hillary Effect also sees Michele Bachman as a player, as the first Republican female to win a straw poll, primary or caucus.

The male leads in this stunning tale are Bill Clinton and President Barack Obama (someone who turned out to be very different from candidate Obama), with David Plouffe and Mark Penn making appearances. The story includes a host of media personalities and their outlets, but also new media and progressive voices, and famous names like Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, Sally Quinn, the late Tim Russert, Richard Wolffe, Laura Ingraham, Liz Cheney, Peggy Noonan, Maureen Dowd, Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and even Bill O’Reilly, who offered Hillary the best interview she would do during the 2008 season.

All of this is seen through the economic and political crises of today, health care, women’s individual freedoms being challenged by the right, Afghanistan, women’s rise around the world, the debt ceiling debate, tax cuts for the wealthy, Occupy Wall Street and an American public disenchanted with Republicans and Democrats, just as the race for 2012 revs up.

Read full story · Comments { 0 }

Outgoing NPR S.V.P. of Fundraising Caught on Tape Telling the Truth about Tea Party

They shoot, they score.

Leaving aside that Mr. Schiller is an idiot for talking so transparently to people he didn’t know, let’s get serious, shall we?

Anyone looked around the American Right today?

This part of the transcript reveals the reality:

SCHILLER: The current Republican Party, particularly the Tea Party, is fanatically involved in people’s personal lives and very fundamental Christian — and I wouldn’t even call it Christian. It’s this weird evangelical kind of move… it’s been hijacked by this group that…

“MUSLIM”: The radical, racist, Islamophobic, Tea Party people?

SCHILLER: It’s not just Islamophobic, but really xenophobic. Basically, they believe in white, middle America, gun-toting — it’s pretty scary. They’re seriously racist, racist people.

Many are focusing on NPR’s outrage over Schiller via their statement after the sting was publicized. That Schiller agrees NPR should not take federal funding because of independence simply further sets up the Right. It also likely dooms NPR to losing their funding eventually.

“As we continue to identify ways to cut spending and save valuable resources, this disturbing video makes clear that taxpayer dollars should no longer be appropriated to NPR.” – Rep. Eric Cantor, via The Hill

But really, isn’t the fact that right-wing conservatives were posing as “scary” Muslim Brotherhood fundraisers trying to catch NPR taking $5 million from this organization, which they declined, enough evidence of the Right’s underlying philosophy and motive regarding Muslims?

What do you call what Rep. Peter King is doing in his scheduled 21st century McCarthy hearings on “radical Islam” targeting Muslims? It’s not just Islamophobic, when you look at the Right’s anti-immigrant stance it’s really xenophobic.

Rep. Eric Cantor has decided to back King, so there can be little doubt of just how Islamophobic leading conservatives are today, because King is purposely targeting an entire group, because of a few fanatical terrorists.

Where does legislation like “fetal heartbeat” bills targeting women’s freedom come from, not to mention the mandatory sonogram legislation? A very fundamentalist, weird kind of person fanatically involved in people’s personal lives.

What kind of people concoct “justifiable homicide” legislation, which is meant to prevent harm to a fetus, ignoring the right’s of women won in the Supreme Court? The radical Right evangelical agenda that has hijacked the Republican Party.

It’s clear the Republican radical Right is engaged in a war against women. It’s been proven.

This isn’t news or at least shouldn’t be.

Former Sen. Jack Danforth went so far to say that if Sen. Dick Lugar is challenged by the Tea Party it means Republicans “have gone so far overboard that we are beyond redemption.” That this comes from an Episcopalian priest should weigh deeply. In 2006, Danforth even asked “Why do traditional Republicans put up with this?”, referring to the “religious” right-wing that’s trying to take our entire country off the cliff. That the Right began titling their articles against people like Mr. Danforth, “Time for a RINO hunt?”, drives home the scary gun-toting language that aided the atmosphere leading to the Tucson domestic terrorism tragedy.

As for racist, did you see the disgusting pictures of Pres. Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama from Tea Party-backed Carl Paladino?

The stupidity of Mr. Schiller, who previously announced he’s leaving NPR for the Aspen Institute, getting caught on tape by a sting operation featuring fake wingnut Muslims speaks for itself.

The talk about Israel and Zionism, as well as “Palestinian Public Radio,” simply reveals our country is not mature enough for these discussions, let alone acting as an arbiter of peace, in which we’ve failed time and again.

But if you want to know why Al Jazeera is the most feared media network by the Right this little NPR sting episode, complete with fake, meant to be scary, Muslim Brotherhood played by wingnuts, gives you a clue.

As for the anti-intellectualism of the Tea Party Right, see Sarah Palin’s rise to vice president, with John McCain and his team not even vetting her first, because she looked so fine. Or look at the vilification of former V.P. Al Gore, who was a much smarter man than George W. Bush, the hero of the wingnut evangelical Right. And if you look into “Dr.” Rand Paul’s credentials you’ll find nothing there.

Read full story · Comments { 14 }

Our Stunning First Lady Upstages the Presidents

**updated**


First Lady Michelle Obama is wearing Alexander McQueen.

Nice touch. Kenneth Roth, executive director for Human Rights Watch, was among the guests at the state dinner this evening.

The food sounds sumptuous, lobster my favorite, but the entertainment is right where my music tastes live. Jazz.

The theme for the evening was “quintessentially American,” with a menu that featured farm-fresh vegetables, poached Maine lobster, dry-aged rib-eye with buttermilk crisp onions, topped off by old-fashioned apple pie with ice cream. The entertainment, in the White House East Room, was the most quintessential of American music — a parade of jazz greats, including Herbie Hancock.

Meanwhile… Chinese Nobel Prize winner Liu Xiaobo remains in jail.

Hey, but not to worry, we get to keep the pandas five more years.

UPDATE: In a stunning example of stupidity, promoting the announcement through hyperbole today, a wingnut radio station, then Daily Caller, trumpeted by Rush Limbaugh, wrongly implied the “Governors Highway Safety Association” was attacking the First Lady over her obesity “Let’s Move” campaign. However, TPMMuckraker got a different story. Talking about the wingnut radio station’s characterization, the group responded, “that’s ridiculous.” Of course it is, but right-wing radio doesn’t deal in facts. It’s about emotion, thus their Michelle Obama’s anti-obesity program is killing people!

“That makes it seems like we’re blaming Michelle Obama’s program,” GHSA executive director Barbara Harsha told TPM. “That’s ridiculous.”

Photo via Huffington Post.

Read full story · Comments { 5 }

Mort Zuckerman’s Rag Got All the Facts Wrong on First Lady Michelle Obama’s Trip

“Taylor, I never heard of you before. But you (sic) just one of the thousands of stupid elitist media whores out there, pimping for that fat Nazi bitch Michelle. Spare us already!” – Stan Lippmann (email from a reader)

Mort’s got some classy friends, doesn’t he?

When I posted about the New York Daily News hit piece on First Lady Michelle Obama I got quite a few emails, especially from Huffington Post. The one above is indicative of the hatred out there, but also what’s directed towards me from all sides, no matter what I write.

But as I wrote, what Zuckerman’s rag unload against the First Lady via a Republican operative, Andrea Tantaros, was not only wrong, but stunningly so. The emails from Obama haters prove that these people cannot be reached through details or the truth. Some more facts, beyond what I provided earlier, from Lynn Sweet.

[...] … First, some numbers. Mrs. Obama did not travel with 40 friends, a number used by some news outlets.

She vacationed with two women, one of them a longtime Chicago pal, Anita Blanchard, who is the obstetrician who delivered Sasha and Malia. Blanchard is married to Marty Nesbitt — President Obama’s buddy and the treasurer of Obama’s presidential campaign fund.

There was one other woman. Total: four daughters among the three women. They paid for their hotel rooms and other personal and travel expenses.

The trip involved six White House advance staffers and two East Wing staffers, deputy Chief of Staff Melissa Winter and Mrs. Obama’s personal assistant, Kristen Jarvis, according to Mrs. Obama’s spokeswoman Catherine McCormick Lelyveld.

Mrs. Obama does travel with significant security — and in a trip like this, three shifts of uniformed and plain-clothes agents and military personnel flew with her on a big Air Force 757. No matter where she goes — domestic or international — any first lady gets protection and she does not decide how many agents are needed.

So why did Mrs. Obama go to Spain at this time? She’s not tone-deaf politically. What was behind the “mother-daughter” vacation?

A White House source told me that Blanchard’s father passed away and Mrs. Obama was not able to make the funeral at the beginning of July. Blanchard had promised her daughter she would take her to Spain for her birthday. She asked Mrs. Obama and Sasha to come with. (Malia is at overnight camp.)

“She felt it was important as a dear friend to do this,” I was told. …

Hey Mort, you’re still a punk.

Read full story · Comments { 24 }

Mort Zuckerman’s Rag Targets the First Lady

P042109PS-0870

Sacrifice is something that many Americans are becoming all too familiar with during this economic downturn. It was a key theme in President Obama’s inaugural address to the nation, and he’s referenced it numerous times when lecturing the country on how to get back on its feet. – New York Daily News, Mort Zuckerman’s mouthpiece

Implying that the First Lady Michelle Obama should have her head cut off in a blaring headline?

There was a piece in Mort Zuckerman’s rag, the New York Daily News, yesterday about First Lady Michelle Obama’s trip to Spain. The title was “Material girl Michelle Obama is a modern-day Marie Antoinette on a glitzy Spanish vacation.” I guess they chose the long title because “Who Does This Bitch Think She Is?” didn’t lump those frivolous French into the title. Mort wanted to get the biggest bang for his buck.

That’s likely his editors chose Andrea Tantaros to write the piece. According to what accompanies the article, “She is a corporate communications professional who was formerly a Republican campaign strategist.” Of course she is. That’s why she can so easily throw around things like “modern-day Marie Antoinette” and “toning down the flash” so the Obama’s could “humanize” themselves. Ms. Tantaros steps all over herself in her class warfare cry.

To be clear, what the Obamas do with their money is one thing; what they do with ours is another. [...] I don’t begrudge anyone rest and relaxation when they work hard. We all need downtime – the First Family included. It’s the extravagance of Michelle Obama’s trip and glitzy destination contrasted with President Obama’s demonization of the rich that smacks of hypocrisy and perpetuates a disconnect between the country and its leaders.

Can you just imagine the ginormous squeal that would come out of these people if First Lady Michelle Obama traveled commercial and ended up inconveniencing who knows how many people, because she commandeered a plane? And the notion that Pres. Obama is demonizing the rich is ludicrous, but no doubt Ms. Tantaros and Mr. Zuckerman are simply furious about Obama holding BP’s bottom line to the fire. Besides, the Obamas aren’t exactly poor themselves, though you’d think card carrying Republicans would get it.

As for Republicans telling anyone what “perpetuates a disconnect between the country and its leaders,” I’d say wanting to repeal the 14 Amendment isn’t exactly embracing America or its people, not to mention that it was Republicans who wouldn’t extend unemployment benefits to workers, but want to continue the Bush tax cuts. Now that’s hypocrisy.

I wonder if Ms. Tantaros or her boss Mr. Zuckerman has recently served food at a homeless shelter like Michelle Obama and her family have done on occasion since they started living in the White House? Or if they spend time at a food bank like First Lady Michelle Obama has regularly? Oh, and I don’t care about “cellphone guy.”

Last year Mort’s rag went after First Lady Michelle Obama’s shoes. Yes, they were hellishly priced, but if she pays for them why should we care?

Now, I understand the Spain trip cost money to cart the Secret Service to Spain, as well as Mrs. Obama, and that Air Force Two obviously costs as well. So, if that blows your mind, so be it, but it’s not what Mort’s rag is making it out to be. She’s the First Lady not being paid a dime and it’s a thankless job at that, because whatever the first lady does she cannot win. So maybe I’m alone, but I just don’t care, except Mrs. Obama doesn’t deserve to be vilified by Republicans using the press to target the First Lady. But as to Ms. Tantaros’ suggestion of a domestic trip, the Obamas will be spending their family vacation in the Gulf Coast region. Pres. Obama stayed home to work on his birthday while Michelle went to Spain with Sasha, while the Malia was at camp. Not good enough, I know.

See, Mr. Zuckerman is very displeased with Pres. Obama, because of his mean, old policies against big business. He said so a week or so ago on “Morning Joe,” lashing into Rahm Emanuel and Obama saying “It is the most hostile administration to business and to the role of business that we’ve had in decades and he’s saying it’s not hostile to business? It’s total hostile to business.” I don’t have time to dissect Mr. Zuckerman’s gigantic whine, but it’s really silly, all because Wall Street got a bad name, because a bunch of crooks stole our money. But not only has Mr. Obama reneged on his pledge to renegotiate NAFTA so far, he’s made a NAFTA-esque trade pact with S. Korea, Panana and Columbia, with David Sirota writing about Obama helping to train workers in South Asia. I could add nuclear power, the oil industry, you name it, but your can use The Google yourself.

Mort’s just miffed because of a little regulation coming back into his world. Or maybe it’s because he might lose his Bush tax cut, I have no idea.

So, his New York rag does the cheapest thing imaginable by going after the President’s wife, First Lady Michelle Obama while she’s on a personal holiday, staying in luxury hotels which she is paying for herself, as are all of her friends. What a punk. Besides, Mrs. Obama has worked hard since coming into the White House and she’s entitled to take a vacation if she wants. They’ve got the money, so who cares? It doesn’t impinge on people struggling, simply because she wants to enjoy herself and has earned the money to pay for it.

That’s not the way life is supposed to work. We are to enjoy ourselves every minute we can steal away from the madness, not begrudging someone for some joy they may create for themselves. It’s not like First Lady Michelle Obama hasn’t been doing good deeds. Her work with childhood obesity is monumentally important, as is the $4.5B child nutrition bill just passed because of her. I wish more fat adults would take it to heart.

There was some media criticism of Nancy Reagan when she was spending a fortune on gowns in the ’80s, but it wasn’t much, even as an entire generation of gay men died off because her husband, Pres. Ronald Reagan, wouldn’t even say the word AIDS in public.

I wonder if Mort Zuckerman had this kind of cow when Jackie Kennedy went on her spending spree to outfit the White House, including indulging herself in a few French designers herself?

As you can see from the poll below that appeared with the wingnut hit piece, nobody is fooled by the New York Daily News screaming “Qu’ils mangent de la brioche!”

I’d personally like to see Pres. Obama call Mr. Zuckerman out on this cheap shot. I know, I know, then Mr. Obama would just get tagged as an angry black man, which might scare the Republican Tea Party into panicking. We can’t have that now, can we.

This post has been updated.

Read full story · Comments { 15 }

Culture Break: ‘Brand Obama’

Not since Jacqueline Kennedy redecorated the White House and used it as a showcase for arts and culture, which helped create the Camelot mystique, has a first family so captured popular fascination, first-lady historian Myra Gutin says. – WSJ.Magazine

Besides being drop dead gorgeous, Desirée Glapion Rogers has a job fit for the gods. Social secretary to the Obama administration, Ms. Rogers is profiled in the WSJ Magazine, in an article that is as fascinating as it is revealing. No spoilers her, just read it.

Unlike previous administrations, which have kept the East and West Wings separate, Rogers and her five-person staff are a vital part of its political operation, according to a White House aide. Every morning at 8:15 a.m., Rogers strides from the East to West Wing, where she attends a meeting with Mr. Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, top Obama aide David Axelrod and other senior White House officials. Letitia Baldrige, social secretary to Mrs. Kennedy, says the policy makers in the West Wing “always wanted to take over the social events” during the Kennedy administration. She says she advised Rogers “to fight back tooth and nail.”

It’s here I must insert a bit of reality. Mrs. Kennedy and Letitia Baldrige fought constantly, with the first lady continually going AWOL when Baldrige believed she should be on duty. Like when Jack was navigating the Cuban Missile Crisis, and Jackie was off fox hunting. (A scene which made it into my 2005 one woman show.) Ms. Baldrige didn’t have the access or the respect that Ms. Rogers obviously has accumulated over the many years she has known the Obamas.

On the opposite side of this story we have a tacky attempt to take down Mrs. Obama, which because of Ms. Rogers’ work will not catch wind, except in wingnut quarters, of course.

The case of the expensive shoes.

Any woman who has ever balanced fashion desires knows one thing. Sometimes you have to choose where your money goes. Of course, Mrs. Obama can buy whatever she wants any time she wants. But considering she’s been seen in off the rack threads from the start, this latest story will bring a collective yawn. But it isn’t surprising to me at all to see this purchase by the First Lady. It’s a classic fashion imperative: great shoes, expensive shoes, even.

As any former beauty queen knows, you can be seen in an inexpensive outfit, but the shoes simply cannot be cheap. It was the first advice I got, which happened to come from a man in the pageant syndicate, when I was 13 years-old and trying to find a way to accumulate enough money to put myself through college. It’s also the law of women’s fashion. You can rarely tell the cost of an outfit, especially worn by a woman as pedigreed as Mrs. Obama, but also as slim and fit, which goes a long way to helping you get away with anything. But cheap shoes can be seen a mile away.

Ms. Rogers’ Obama brand magic has been solidified, so attacking the First Lady’s hot French sneakers is just an attack by the mob who can’t seem to land an insult that will stick. Just wait until someone makes a knock off; they’ll sell like inauguration tickets.

Read full story · Comments are closed

David Brooks Fears First Lady’s Biceps

Photobucket

Alert the media! Michelle Obama is showing arm. Because a dress up to her neck isn’t covering enough, at least according to the quivering Mr. Brooks.

Maureen Dowd lifts Washington’s shirt on this one today. There was Clinton cleavage-gate, now we’ve got Michelle Obama’s biceps stirring the fears of Washingtonians. Of course, all of this comes to us compliments of Washington’s gossip columnist Maureen Dowd, who decided to dish about a cab ride she took with her New York Times colleague David Brooks. However, unlike Dowd’s never ending Clinton hatred, she evidently finds Michelle Obama the strongest person in town, by virtue of “Thunder and Lightning,” as Brooks calls the First Lady’s biceps:

In the taxi, when I asked David Brooks about her amazing arms, he indicated it was time for her to cover up. “She’s made her point,” he said. “Now she should put away Thunder and Lightning.”

I’d seen the plaint echoed elsewhere. “Someone should tell Michelle to mix up her wardrobe and cover up from time to time,” Sandra McElwaine wrote last week on The Daily Beast.

Washington is a place where people have always been suspect of style and overt sexuality. Too much preening signals that you’re not up late studying cap-and-trade agreements. [...]

Time for her to cover up, clucks Brooks.

If this doesn’t say it all about the spineless upper echelons of the traditional media. First you’ve got Brooks offended because the First Lady has sculpted biceps where he doesn’t. Secondly, you’ve got Maureen Dowd writing a column on it, though she does give Mrs. Obama her due, while not missing the opportunity to whack Hillary Clinton yet again.

Brooks babbles on, the fear of Mrs. Obama’s biceps dancing across his brain. Something about it must take him back to high school.

He said the policy crowd here would consider the dress ostentatious. “Washington is sensually avoidant. The wonks here like brains. She should not be known for her physical presence, for one body part.” David brought up the Obamas’ obsession with their workouts. “Sometimes I think half the reason Obama ran for president is so Michelle would have a platform to show off her biceps.”

Women’s prowess of mind has been emasculating the pyramids of power in this country for decades. Now it seems Michelle Obama has tipped the scale with her new weapons, Thunder and Lightning, putting the physical fear of retaliation at the right-wing weaklings’ doorstep, while revealing a consummate conservative horror. The trepidation they have with all things sexual when it comes to women. Men are to be macho, testosterone pumping kings, while women should know their place as these perverts to personal privacy tell women what to do with our bodies, as well as what’s appropriate to wear especially when our bodies are stronger than theirs, and even if we’re covered to the neck.

Brooks’ Talibanic protestations are symbolic of all things amiss with Republicans who refuse to come into the 20th century.

Somewhere I think I hear Camille Paglia laughing, as she wrote the book on sexual persona a long time ago.

The male ego is a sexual persona (the Latin word for mask)–one of many personae adopted at different times and for different reasons by different people–that reduplicates itself in phallic monuments and skyscrapers (stairways to the sky, the sun, to Heaven), in religious doctrines that designate women as the servants of men, in plays were “shrews” are to be tamed. By controlling “their women,” men are attempting to control “nature,” the ultimate representation of POWER. But deep down they know that, like their own penises that shrivel into a flaccid strands of flesh once orgasm has been achieved, their own power is fleeting. So they fight and fight the unwinnable war–and Western Culture is the dazzling carnage their havoc has wreaked.

Neither David Brooks or Rush Limbaugh, the Republicans’ current king of conservatism, could take on Michelle Obama in any manner of voice, spirit or physical persona. That first ladies are to be seen, not heard, and certainly never feared, is the never ending message from these men. Hillary Clinton broke the mold on the role and it looks like Michelle Obama is going to take it the rest of the way. That she’s doing it in grand style while leaving cowering, wimpy conservatives in her wake is just a bonus.

Read full story · Comments { 47 }

Michelle Has Arrived

by Scott Hopkins
Reporting from Denver

Right after the highly emotional return for Teddy, if I was told that Michelle Obama’s address would top it…I wouldn’t have believed it. But that’s exactly what happened.

In fact, I would even go so far as to say that she outdid many of the speeches that I’ve seen from her husband. Those heartfelt personal anecdotes worked tonight, and Barack needs more of that in his own speeches. You could hear in her halting voice just how real this was for her. And the cameras panning around the arena recorded what effect it had – watery eyes all around. This speech worked and worked big time. It was the humanization that she desperately needed. Also, she never looked better.

Lord help me, but I also started to get the warm-and-fuzzies when Barack appeared onscreen to banter with his daughters. I mean, how could you not? That is one beautiful family.

Before the night was out, I was already hearing some handwringing going on about the tone of this first night, notably Carville on CNN. They’ve got a point, and even Donna Brazile admitted the evening wasn’t exactly a bastion of excitement. Hopefully the next few nights will be tougher on Bush and McCain, but two important things did occur tonight: The fiery return of Teddy Kennedy, and the arrival of Michelle Obama, potential first lady.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Michelle Obama Tonight

Reporting from Denver



From the Obama camp:


TONIGHT: Michelle Obama’s Prime-Time Speech to Detail the Obama
Family’s Life, Values and Commitment to Service

To kick off the night, Obama Campaign to Unveil Biographical Film
“South Side Girl”

Denver, CO – Michelle Obama will deliver the first headline prime-time
speech of the Democratic National Convention this evening. Michelle Obama
will talk about her husband, Democratic nominee Barack Obama, the values that
have driven him as a father, husband and public servant, and why she believes
he will be an extraordinary president. As the person who knows him best, there’s
no one who can do a better job introducing Barack Obama to the country.

In her speech, Michelle will give the country a personal view of Barack Obama
– her husband, and Sasha and Malia’s Dad. She will talk about
their life together, and building a family grounded in faith and values. The
more America learns about this family, the more they’re going to want
to send them to the White House.

Michelle will also talk about her upbringing on the South Side of Chicago.
Her story is a great American story: modest means but big dreams—and
encouragement from loving parents that she and her brother could accomplish
whatever they put their minds to if they worked hard. Like Barack, Michelle
was also taught to give back to the community and the country that has given
her so much. Now, as a working mother of two young girls, Michelle is continuing
to give back to the community and country she loves.

Like many moms, she’s learned to juggle the responsibilities of work
and family. She knows what it’s like for millions of women who face
the same challenges every day. She’s made a career of bringing people
together and finding solutions to seemingly intractable problems in her community
and that’s exactly what she’ll do as First Lady.

Over the last 19 months, Mrs. Obama has demonstrated a unique ability to
connect with people across the country on the campaign trail and share in
their American experience. People have come away from her campaign events
knowing that they will have a first lady who truly understands their challenges
and is committed to helping women and families.

South Side Girl will preview Michelle Obama’s speech. Narrated by her
mother, Marian Robinson, the film describes Mrs. Obama’s family background,
highlighting her upbringing and the values that have shaped her as a mother,
wife, daughter, sister, mentor and dedicated community service advocate. Craig
Robinson will then introduce Michelle, sharing his personal perspective on
his little sister, their upbringing and their family.

Below is some brief background on those appearing in South Side Girl the
film:

Marian Robinson

Marian Robinson goes by many titles. Malia and Sasha Obama call her Grandma.
Barack and Michelle Obama call her Mom. She’s been called “the
linchpin of Barack Obama’s presidential campaign”—because
when Barack and Michelle are on the campaign trail, she takes care of the
most important people in their lives.

“I’m standing here, breathing in and out with any level of calm,
because my mother is home with my girls,” Michelle frequently says when
she’s on the road. “There’s no one like Grandma.”

Marian Shields was born in Chicago in July 1937. She grew up in Woodlawn
on the South Side, and married her husband, Fraser Robinson, in 1960. Fraser
worked for the Chicago water department, while Marian stayed home and raised
their two children: Craig, who was born in 1962, and Michelle, who came along
two years later.

The family was very close, spending long hours talking around the dinner
table. “We felt like center of our parents’ universe, because
they put us there,” Michelle says.

When Michelle entered high school, Marian went back to work, becoming a secretary
in a bank. She retired last year. She still lives in the home that the Robinson
family shared on the South Side. Barack, Michelle, Malia and Sasha live just
a few miles away, and Mrs. Robinson and her granddaughters see each other
almost every day. She is also the proud grandmother to Craig’s two children:
Avery, 16, and Leslie, 12.

Craig Robinson

Craig Robinson has had two lifelong loves: his family and basketball. Growing
up, Craig was a star player for his high school team. His parents and sister
were his biggest fans. “We spent every Saturday on a basketball court
somewhere, watching my brother play,” Michelle says. He went to Princeton,
where he became one of the best basketball players in the history of the university
and the first two-time Ivy League basketball player of the year. Following
two seasons of professional basketball in England, Craig returned to the states
and earned an MBA from the University of Chicago and spent seven years as
a vice president for Morgan Stanley Dean Witter.

But Craig never gave up his love for the game. In 1999, while he was a managing
director at the Chicago investment banking firm Loop Capital Markets, he got
a call from one of his coaches from Princeton. Craig’s former coach
was now the coach at Northwestern, and he wanted Craig to work for him. After
some serious thought, Craig decided to leave the world of finance and get
back on the basketball court. Craig spent six seasons as an assistant coach
at Northwestern. Then he spent two seasons as the head coach at Brown. This
spring, he was named the head basketball coach at Oregon State. His basketball
career has come full circle. “Every day, I’m doing something I
love,” he says. Craig will be joined this evening by his wife, Kelly,
and kids Avery, 16, and Leslie, 12.

Jobi Peterson Cates

Jobi Peterson Cates met Michelle Obama in 1993 at Public Allies, a youth
leadership training and Americorps national service program, of which Mrs.
Obama started the Chicago chapter. They worked together for two years, and
have remained friends since. Jobi Peterson Cates went on to become the Vice
President of External Relations at the Heartland Alliance, a service bases
human rights organization in Chicago. She also served as the Executive Director
of the Illinois Caucus for Adolescent Health, where she led a restructuring
and organizational development process. Peterson Cates is now the Human Rights
Watch Director for the Chicago & Midwest Region.

Yvonne Davila

Yvonne Davila first met Michelle Obama twenty years ago when they were young
staffers together in the office of Chicago Mayor Richard Daley, and they have
remained incredibly close. Now, they juggle the day to day balance of work
and family together, shuttling their daughters of comparable ages to school,
play dates, pizza parties and soccer games. Since the Mayor’s office,
for over 15 years, Ms. Davila has been worked as a public relations executive,
and is currently a partner at D & T Communications, Inc., a firm specializing
in public relations and marketing strategies that include media and community
relations, governmental affairs, policy and crisis management. She is the
mother of two daughters, Elizabeth and Katherine.

Charles Ogletree

Charles Ogletree, a professor and mentor of Michelle Obama’s at Harvard
Law School, is the Harvard Law School Jesse Climenko Professor of Law and
Vice Dean for the Clinical Programs. Ogletree began his career at Harvard
Law the same year Mrs. Obama arrived as a student.

Travis Rejman

Travis Rejman met Michelle Obama at Public Allies, an Americorps national
service program and youth leadership training program in the Chicago community,
of which Mrs. Obama was the Founding Director in the early 1990s. Mr. Rejman
has since become the founding Executive Director of the Goldin Institute,
a global forum dedicated to supporting grassroots partnerships for global
change in the areas of poverty alleviation, environmental sustainability,
and reconciliation that began in 2002. Prior to creating the Goldin Institute,
Travis served as Director for the Council for a Parliament of the World’s
Religions, leading the development of the program for the 2004 (Barcelona)
and 1999 (Cape Town) Parliaments of the World’s Religions. Prior to working
in the interreligious field, Travis worked in the environmental movement,
focusing on coalition building, grassroots education and civic engagement.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Obama Walks into Hillaryland at the Mayflower


The symbolism was important.

Yesterday, news reports that some Clinton donors were miffed at Obama for not
offering a cash gesture of good will was in the news. Obama obviously got the message, because tonight at the Mayflower Hotel both Barack and Michelle Obama ponied up.


Senator Barack Obama said on Thursday that he had written a personal check
of $2,300 to Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, a goodwill gesture intended to
nudge his top donors to help ease Mrs. Clinton’s campaign debt and help
the two Democrats move beyond their rivalry to focus on the fall contest.

…I wrote my check to the Hillary for President Committee,” said Mr.
Obama, who was greeted with booming applause. His wife, Michelle, also contributed
$2,300.

“I recognize that this room shares the same passion that a roomful
of my supporters would show,” Mr. Obama added. “I do not expect
that passion to be transferred. Senator Clinton is unique, and your relationships
with her are unique. Senator Clinton and I at our core agree deeply that this
country needs to change.”…

Obama
Gives $2,300, Intended as a Spur, for Clinton Debt

According to CNN, not everyone from Clinton’s groups showed up tonight, but
those who did got what’s important. Obama giving Clinton her due. As for unity, we’ll get there, because all that matters
to most is winning in November. But no doubt there’s still a ways to go.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Tale of Two Wives

Associated Press

Cindy McCain is pictured in Vietnam, also quoted criticizing Burma, taking a page from Hillary Clinton’s playbook: “I don’t understand how human life doesn’t matter to somebody. But clearly, it doesn’t matter to them.”

Meanwhile, Michelle Obama was doing “The View.”

Seems to me to paint very stark and competing portraits of two important political wives. Mind you, Michelle Obama has the intellect to equal Cindy McCain’s outreach. But the fact is that this isn’t where the Obama campaign gurus wanted Mrs. Obama to go. It’s a pattern with Democratic message people when it comes to our nominee’s wife.

In Mrs.
McCain’s interview with John King
yesterday, she was dressed in a baseball
cap and a baggy shirt, pictured walking through an Operation Smile facility in Vietnam that has
to do with repairing facial deformities. To add, Cindy and John McCain’s adopted daughter Bridget, whom they met through Mother Theresa’s orphanage, had a cleft pallate that was successfully repaired, and the McCains are on the board of directors for Operation Smile.


Cindy McCain is in Vietnam on a medical mission and also doing interviews
on the U.S. political campaign. Today on CNN she said she doesn’t think wives
and families are fair game in the election, and she does think Michelle Obama
is a “fine woman.”

McCain made spontaneous comments about being proud of her country in February
after Obama said that she was really proud of her country “for the first
time in my adult lifetime.”

McCain said on CNN that her remarks were “an emotional outpouring”
from someone in a family oriented toward military service. “It was nothing
more than me just saying I believe in this country so strongly,” she
said. …

Obviously, the McCain camp is very confident in his wife’s role, what she has
to offer and anything she might say.

By contrast you had the Obama campaign working to do a makeover on Michelle
Obama on “The View.” I know, I know, the campaign said that’s not what they were doing, but everyone knows it was because it was obvious.

Of course, Cindy McCain made an appearance on the show too, to cover over for a recipe
flap. Michelle Obama went on the show to try to cover over what was seen as
an unpatriotic slap. The opening line in the Times
review sets the stage: First, she had to unclench her fist.

Mind you, Mrs. Obama was flawless in the event, even managing to cause a positive
fashion run on the store that supplied her beautiful black and white dress.
However, there was something vapid, “She’s really safe! Honest” about
Mrs. Obama’s appearance. No cause, except her own. No passion, except to say
that she’s okay. No lasting impact. That might have been the point, which is
what is so disconcerting, especially when compared to Cindy McCain and her causes in Vietnam and Burma. No doubt Mrs. Obama could have rivaled the photo op, but inside the Obama camp that’s the last place they were headed with her.

Not that anyone votes on first lady choices, but Democrats seem to be walking down the same path we always
do on these things. Softening the strength out of the spouse because we’re afraid
the feminist within will be exposed. While the Republicans, for lack of a better
way to phrase it, let Cindy McCain be, well, Cindy McCain.


It is a familiar pattern. Democratic candidates’ wives — from
Rosalynn Carter and Kitty Dukakis to Hillary Rodham Clinton and Teresa Heinz
Kerry — are almost invariably characterized by opponents as too feisty
and too outspoken, a little too radical for mainstream America. Betty Ford
was an early exception to the Republican rule of bland, self-effacing homemakers;
as the Equal Rights Amendment faded as a cause and conservatism made a comeback,
Republican spouses became ever more careful to stay three steps behind their
men and the times. And some have become so intent that they are accused of
playacting. …

Michelle
Obama Shows Her Warmer Side on ‘The View’

Michelle Obama has previously earned very critical reviews around here for
her impolitic statements, so I was pleased she did “The View” to round
off edges that appeared early on in moments on the trail that were beyond abrasive.
But at the same time I wondered why this couldn’t have been accomplished in a manner that was less
“Leave It To Beaver,” illustrating Mrs. Obama’s passions
and her purpose instead. I can’t be the only one sensing that the Obama camp is having
a Theresa Heinz Kerry, Hillary Clinton moment, telegraphing they’re uncomfortable
with yet another strong spouse who might scare middle America and doesn’t know
quite what to do about it. But reverting to traditional stereotypes never seems
to work, because it doesn’t fit the woman. It’s also not very original or creative, instead a throw back. That’s what was wrong
with “The View” appearance yesterday. It was Michelle Obama airbrushed.

Juxtapose that against Cindy McCain dressed down in Vietnam, then talking about Burma’s disrespect for human rights, and you have quite
a contrast.

Authenticity meets image concoction. First lady auditions are ugly.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Michelle Obama: Taking Cues from Laura Bush



Ah yes, the demure, muted Laura Bush. Can’t have an outspoken feminist female
as first lady now can we. Stereotypes prevail, especially for first ladies. You could see this one coming a mile away.

Let the makeover begin. “Be good,” said Barack to his wife. Michelle
Obama on “The View”
today began the job, though it should be said
that according to MSNBC, Mrs. Obama has a 9-point approval advantage over Cindy
McCain.

First, it helps a lot that Michelle Obama is gorgeous. But her hair and makeup
were flawless today. The black and white floral dress was a knock out, very
feminine. Stephanie Cutler has come in to help with her image and such, but
it’s clear they’ve been thinking about this for a while. Ever since her statement
that for the first time she’s “really proud” of her country exploded, which sent me around the twist. To say that this
first entry into the American political scene wasn’t helpful is an understatement
of monumental proportions.

Segue to the gentler, softer side of Michelle Obama.


“It’s fun to look pretty.” – Michelle Obama

Any woman would agree. Mrs. Obama accomplished that and more today.

Secondly, she’s a very smart woman, very smart. She obviously understands what’s
at stake and what her previous performances, especially on her “really proud of my country” catastrophe, could cause, not only her husband, but the entire Democratic Party.

“The View” provided exactly what Michelle Obama needed, including a chance to give a nod to Hillary.


“People aren’t used to strong women…. There are times people don’t
even know how to talk about them. … Hillary Clinton has created 18 million
cracks. … But she’s taken them so my girls, when they come along, won’t
have to take it. …” – Michelle Obama on “The View”

As for picking Clinton as vice president, which Walters asked, “I’m
just glad I’ll have nothing to do with it,”
replied Mrs. Obama. She
also stated that the nominee has earned the right to pick the best person for
the position.

Radio open thread. Mrs. Obama will be a main topic today, as will Obama picking former Clinton administration foreign policy experts for his team.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Where Was Obama When Hillary Was Attacked?

via Marc Ambinder


Everyone can certainly understand Senator Obama sticking up for his wife.


In a one-on-one interview with The Brody File, Barack Obama says he is deeply
disappointed that John McCain has not spoken out against the attacks leveled
against his wife.

Michelle Obama has come under criticism from some conservatives because of
comments that they say suggest she’s unpatriotic, not proud to be an American
and outside the mainstream.

Obama vigorously defends his wife.

This is unfortunately become a habit in our politics where anything’s
fair game, and we just make things up about people. If you think about Michelle,
I mean here’s somebody who’s done everything right. She grew up in modest
means. She grew up in a nuclear family. Her parents looked after her. She
went to college on a scholarship. She’s worked hard for everything that she
has.

She is the best mother I know…

EXCLUSIVE: Obama Expresses
‘Deep Disappointment’ in McCain’s Silence on Wife Attacks

Republicans are going to target Michelle Obama for her viewpoints and the
things she’s said.
Senator Obama doesn’t like it.

But where was Obama when Hillary was getting maligned in the press? He was
nowhere to be found.

This situational anti sexism doesn’t impress me much from Senator Obama. All
it does is remind me of his silence throughout the entire primary season, incluinding
when his national co-chair Jesse Jackson Jr. questioned whether Hillary cried
after Katrina.

So excuse me if I’m not too moved about Obama hitting McCain for not sticking
up for his wife, especially since he couldn’t do the same for Hillary. To combat
this type of sexism you can’t just care when it happens to you or your family.
It’s got to matter no matter the woman being slimed. Obama is now learning it
doesn’t feel too good, just like Bill Clinton learned on the campaign trail. No one cared when WJC complained about this stuff; instead they attacked him mercilessly for simply sticking up for his wife. Because after all, we are talking about the Clintons.

Too bad Obama didn’t have the spine to stick up for Hillary, too. Then I’d be all in on this latest from our nominee. But since he couldn’t be bothered neither can I.

However, it is interesting that he went to David Brody to posture about it and get all chivalrous, no doubt in an attempt to traditionalize his marriage and his role as defender. He’s hitting McCain in his weak spot, tapping into the Christian Broadcasting Network’s audience, which isn’t a bad play. They likely know nothing about Obama’s situational sexist outrage. Lions to lambs, etc.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Michelle Obama v. Cindy McCain

Cindy McCain, Michelle Obama in patriotism flap:


As she introduced her husband John McCain, the likely Republican nominee, at a campaign event, Cindy McCain told the crowd I “am proud of my country. I don’t know about you, if you heard those words earlier — I am very proud of my country.”

The comment seemed to be a response to a remark from Michelle Obama the day before. On Monday, the wife of Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama told a Wisconsin audience that “For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country, because it feels like hope is making a comeback… not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change.”

After Tuesday’s event, the McCains were asked if the Arizona senator’s wife had been responding to that comment. Cindy McCain did not directly answer the question, responding: “I just wanted to make the statement that I have and always will be proud of my country.”

On Monday, Obama spokesman Bill Burton released a statement in response to the controversy: “Of course Michelle is proud of her country, which is why she and Barack talk constantly about how their story wouldn’t be possible in any other nation on Earth.

“What she meant is that she’s really proud at this moment because for the first time in a long time, thousands of Americans who’ve never participated in politics before are coming out in record numbers to build a grassroots movement for change.”

To update from the show, yes, words do matter. You say what you mean the first time out. When it comes to talking about your country, especially when representing someone who wants to be president, you shouldn’t have to have an interpreter put out a press release to explain what you actually meant, when what you really said was an insult. Why do Republicans always get this stuff, but Democrats come across like amateurs? Point to McCain.

Hope you can join me.

Until the show starts, this is an open thread.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Michelle Obama Does Not Speak for Me



“For the first time in my adult lifetime I am really proud
of my country. And not just because Barack has done well, but because I think
people are hungry for change.”
Michelle
Obama
(video)

You should never write something when you’re furious, but here goes anyway. Like Democrats need this kind of crap.

The love I have for this country does not depend on a political campaign predicated
on the notion of “change.”

The love I have for this country does not depend on one person, certainly not
some politician
with a slogan that others have used, which he has re-used.

The love I have for this country does not depend on aiding the winning of someone for president, without a clue what he or she is offering in the guise of one word, “change.”

The love I have for this country does not depend on ignorance of what patriotism
requires to serve a personal goal.

My uncle Dick certainly didn’t serve his country and get battle fatigue in
WWII so people could pick and choose pride in this nation based on personal
association to some politician, forgetting the greater glory we all serve through
our country’s ideals.

My husband, a blue collar man, doesn’t support our cause 24/7 because he believes
one politician is the answer, or that this moment a deliverer has presented
himself through the notion of “change.” This blue collar family expects politicians to offer solutions, THAT’S
RIGHT, SOLUTIONS, not words or promises of “change.”

The love I have for my country does not include following yet another political huckster down
a path where he gets the glory he craves, while my blue collar family gets the
shaft… again.

The love I have for this country knows no political party bounds.

The love I have for this country also does not require allegiance to some woman’s
husband, who people have declared the political Messiah in a nation that requires
none, because WE THE PEOPLE will save ourselves, provided some political incompetent doesn’t think unity is more important than the Democratic ideals that have proved important to us all.

The love I have for this country means that I will walk through the fires of
hell to keep someone unqualified for the presidency of the United States from
acquiring that position, successful or not and regardless of what it costs me personally, which doesn’t
matter one whit compared to this nation I hold dear. I will not swear allegiance
to any person who offers platitudes in the disguise of the presidential, on the wings of some amorphous promise of “change.”

The love I have for this country makes me an American first, a Democrat second.
Never before in my life have I been more aware of this fact than I was after
I thought long and hard about Michelle Obama’s comments, not able to brush them
aside, though that was my first instinct and said so, only to hear her words
flash before me again and again, finally causing something to rise up deep inside
me to scream NOT THIS AMERICAN.

Michelle Obama does not speak for me.

Proud to be an American, after forty plus years, because of some “change” that’s promised, but not described?

I’ve been proud to be an American my whole life. It doesn’t depend on some
personal attachment to someone I’m trying to elevate to leader, through some word that he has not yet defined.

The love I have for this country has nothing to do with Michelle Obama’s Me-Me-Me
mantra. The narcissistic, self centered, arrogant insult delivered by Michelle
Obama, representing a man who hopes to talk his way into 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue,
is a slap at the American spirit that runs throughout this country, regardless
of political party, race, gender, creed, religion, you name it, and the word “change” alone can’t alter the course on which we are disastrously careening without a plan.

I am a proud American first. A liberal second. But Michelle Obama will never
speak for me. Not until I know the definition of “change” that’s being offered amidst a record that doesn’t come close to measuring up to all the endless talk.

UPDATE: The New York Times quotes my piece today, as do others. It’s really remarkable that people can’t understand why someone, even –insert shock & dismay here– a liberal, would find Michelle Obama’s comments insulting and unacceptable. That’s how out of touch some people in the Democratic party have become with people like me and my husband. I’ve lived in New York City and Los Angeles, traveled the country too (and beyond), but I’m from Harry Truman’s Missouri. From where I come from, words like Mrs. Obama’s are not only objectionable, but unacceptable. I’m also someone who would know that these words would offend people without having someone to explain it to me and clarify my comment afterward. Where I come from people don’t talk like this about your country. I’m not saying that America is perfect. But I’m proud of what we’ve done in the world for people everywhere, amidst our mistakes. You have to be terribly out of touch not to get it, or so hopelessly elitist is doesn’t register.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Michelle Obama Not Sure She Can Support Clinton

updated



Here’s a rough transcript of Mrs. Obama on GMA (also on Salon.com):


GMA: Could you see yourself working to support Hillary Clinton should she win the nomination?

MICHELLE OBAMA: I’d have to think about that. I’d have to think about that, her policies, her approach, her tone.

GMA: That’s not a given?

MICHELLE OBAMA: You know, everyone in this party is going to work hard for whoever the nominee is. I think that we’re all working for the same thing. And, you know, I think our goal is to make sure that the person in the White House is going to take this country in a different direction. I happen to believe that Barack is the only person who can really do that.

Ah yes, tone. You mean like this?



“I’m confident that I will get her votes votes if I’m the nominee, it’s not clear that she would get the votes I got if she were the nominee.” – Barack Obama

Well, at least the Obama’s are reading off of the same script, as people suck their Hope Soda up with a straw.

This just about tears it for me.

Read full story · Comments are closed