TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Tag Archives | movies

Did Clint Eastwood Know He Was Making a Case for Pres. Obama?

**UPDATED**

[update]“I just want to say that the spin stops with you guys, and there is no spin in that ad. On this I am certain. I am certainly not politically affiliated with Mr. Obama. It was meant to be a message about just about job growth and the spirit of America. I think all politicians will agree with it. I thought the spirit was OK. I am not supporting any politician at this time. Chrysler to their credit didn’t even have cars in the ad. Anything they gave me for it went for charity. If any Obama or any other politician wants to run with the spirit of that ad, go for it.” – Clint Eastwood to Bill O’Reilly’s producer

video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

The Super Bowl ad above has caused quite a ruckus. As you’ll see in the update at the top [update]. Rove responded earlier.

“I was, frankly, offended by it,” said Karl Rove on Fox News Monday. “I’m a huge fan of Clint Eastwood, I thought it was an extremely well-done ad, but it is a sign of what happens when you have Chicago-style politics, and the president of the United States and his political minions are, in essence, using our tax dollars to buy corporate advertising.” – Karl Rove quoted in the Washington Post

Mr. Eastwood is in direct conflict with what he said last year.

“We shouldn’t be bailing out the banks and car companies. If a CEO can’t figure out how to make his company profitable, then he shouldn’t be the CEO.” – Clint Eastwood

Bailing out the U.S. car industry is one of the most exceptionally American things Pres. Obama has done.

I’ve read Lawrence Summers 57-page economic memo and any person or politician positing that the Obama administration isn’t partially responsible for the trajectory of our economy, which is headed in positive direction, simply cannot be trusted.

What I find inexcusable is what might have happened if Pres. Obama had opened up Medicare as his first stop in solving health care, especially at a moment in time where he had the people ready to back him. A stimulus of the size Robert Reich suggested is another failing. However, at least Pres. Obama didn’t check the austerity box with Bowles-Simpson.

In the Super Bowl ad above, Clint Eastwood, when faced with a script that hails the saving of a quintessentially American industry and manufacturing base, does what any American with common sense would feel compelled to do. Praise the efforts and say we need more of it.

It used to be something on which we could all agree. Objective facts of success leading to someone to seeing a template for paving the way ahead.

Writers like Charles Kupchin are starting to weigh in that China’s GDP will pass the U.S. in around ten years. The World Bank has predicted that the dollar, the renminbi, China’s currency, and the euro will become part of a new “multi-currency” in less than 3 decades.

So far, Mitt Romney nor Newt Gingrich or any other Republican have come close to explaining their plans for stopping what many see as inevitable, given our current trajectory We’re left with platitudes and fearmongering from Republicans who are asking Americans to vote for them to lead us.

It will be frightening if people actually start believing the current crop of Republicans has one clue what to do, besides inflict austerity on a fragile recovering that is going in the right direction. When you look at Mitt Romney’s answers to our economic woes there is absolutely no sense he understands how austerity will impact the poor, many of whom are women and children.

If Republicans are going to take the government out of the building future of the United States, I would suggest that what Kupchin and others are saying will happen in ten or twenty years will be on our doorstep a lot earlier.

I say this as someone who no longer trusts Pres. Obama or believes he has the ideological compass or passion to do what’s required. However, that doesn’t mean Republicans do. That our politics is dumbed down to this either or choice is partially why writers are giving the U.S. such dire future prospects, because Republicans and Democrats clearly aren’t up to the challenges.

That Clint Eastwood didn’t even get what he was saying or representing in the Super Bowl ad above should give people pause.

Karl Rove clearly got the message and it freaked him out.

Read full story · Comments { 13 }

Cinematherapy in Feminist Perspective: Daisy Bates

Hello news junkies… Wonk the Vote here with a new feature at TM.com that I hope you enjoy!

Tonight, my recommendation for you is the PBS Independent Lens documentary that aired this week  — Daisy Bates: First Lady of Little Rock.

The Louisville Film Society also screened the film at the Dreamland Film Center earlier last month. From what appears to be the press release of that screening:

“As a black woman who was a feminist before the term was invented, Daisy Bates refused to accept her assigned place in society. ‘Daisy Bates: First Lady of Little Rock’ tells the story of her life and public support of nine black students who registered to attend the all-white Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas, which culminated in a constitutional crisis — pitting a president against a governor and a community against itself. Unconventional, revolutionary, and egotistical, Daisy Bates reaped the rewards of instant fame, but paid dearly for it.”

Can I just say that I am so glad PBS chose to kick black history month off by spotlighting a *feminist* leader of the civil rights movement? (The late Dorothy Height would have been an excellent choice too!)

Funny how women always pay “dearly” for ego in anything political, but today’s Newts and Romneys and–yes, Obamas, too–all self-inflate with reckless abandon and don’t seem to suffer for it all that much–or have their names disappeared from the history books.

Contra Costa Times, via Kansas City Star:

If you were to compile a quick, off-the-top-of-your-head list of civil rights-era heroes (no Googling allowed), Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks and a few others might immediately spring to mind.

But Daisy Bates? Probably not – despite the fact that she played a key role in the Little Rock integration crisis of 1957 and that she, like King, spoke at the landmark March on Washington.

Eurweb.com has a great quote from producer-director Sharon La Cruise:

“I just couldn’t understand, because I studied history and I thought I knew it extensively, especially African American history. I didn’t know why I didn’t know anything about her,” said La Cruise. “So I read her autobiography. I wrote her a letter. I said basically what I’ve just said, to her, that I didn’t understand why I didn’t know about her, and I want to know more about her, and I thought her life would make this incredible film.”

More from La Cruise via her op-ed at Womens E-News:

I became fascinated by the thought of that 8-year-old child who in one day learned she was an orphan and realized that being black meant you lived in a world where your life was insignificant. I wrote Bates and told her how much I admired her and thought her life story should be turned into a documentary film. She responded through her attorney that she would love to explore the idea further.

I was beyond thrilled to hear back, but then realized I had no idea how to produce a full-length documentary. I’d studied at New York University’s School of Journalism but didn’t have a lot of filmmaking experience. So I wasted two years dreaming of producing a documentary, not realizing how ill Bates was. On Nov. 4, 1999, I woke up to hear NPR reading Bates’ obituary. I was devastated.

Five years later though, in 2004, I decided to make the documentary after all. I’d gained experience by then and thought I was ready. But it took me seven long years to complete the film, as I worked on other projects and scraped by on funding. I was the director, producer and bottle-washer in one. I managed to hire some researchers, but did most of it myself. Kind friends helped me out on the script.

Dorothy Height’s memoir is on my current reading list and so her story is fresh on my mind–as is Shirley Sherrod’s encounter with the current Administration. I’m struck by the similarities of all these women’s stories–Daisy Bates’, Shirley Sherrod’s, Dorothy Height’s. They were all spurred to action by simply facing the inequality and injustice that they had faced since childhood, head-on in their adulthood. Their refusal to settle for less than their “inalienable” rights is the quintessential story of the ordinary American hero(ine).

They are each of them Rosa Parks on that bus, just having had enough of being treated inferiorly–but each with a unique story of her own to tell, stories that deserve to be heard.

From the Gray Lady’s review of the doc:

Ms. La Cruise injects first-person musings into the film that sit awkwardly, but she also finds side stories that elevate her movie above mere hagiography. Ms. Bates’s aggressiveness on integration was divisive for the state’s black leaders, and that she was a woman meant she was pushing against more than just racial barriers.

I am reminded here of what Dorothy Heights so eloquently termed the

“triple bind of racism, sexism and poverty.”

SF Weekly echoes the Gray Lady’s take on La Cruise and her Daisy Bates doc:

​In the process, Cruise also uncovers a personality as complex as the era — a charismatic, self-taught firebrand whose need of drink led to three early strokes and whose need of attention often led to alienation, even from those she would help. In some ways this is a tragedy that culminates in a state holiday, but we are left with an authentic heroine who has not been whitewashed.

This is where the political girl-junkie in me says, “Squee!”

PBS has a trailer and a few clips up here, and if you’d like to watch the entire documentary, it will be up for free for your viewing, for the next two weeks.

Also, the Zinn Education Project has a great related lesson plan–Warriors Don’t Cry: Connecting History, Literature, and Our Lives–that you might want to check out, especially you educators amongst the TM.com readership.

 

Read full story · Comments { 5 }

Political Junky Friday, Hosted by TCM & The Movies



One of the most important cultural links you’ll need this month: The schedule of Turner Classic Movies leading up to The Oscars.

I’ve been a fan of films since I was a little girl dreaming of getting out of Missouri. They were my escape. I’m passionate about them, all sorts of films from “Gone with the Wind” to John Wayne classics to B-movies and Joan Crawford to science fiction, as well as comedy and murder mysteries, you name it.

Gary Oldman, one of my favorite actors, has been nominated for an Oscar in Tinker, Tailer, Soldier, Spy, based on the 1974 book by John le Carré, which is a stupendously marvelous film. I’m not surprised it wasn’t nominated for best picture, because it’s intensity is quietly patient and methodical, not a characteristic of Academy nominees. The performances are out of sight.

Oscar is overrated. It’s political, tilted to the personal or publicist marketing. Film award season just tends to be odd. Meryl Streep won the Golden Glober playing Margaret Thatcher, in one of the most wretchedly over-hyped films that doesn’t deliver. Rooney Mara, a tour de force original, and Michelle Williams give equally brilliant performances. I’m not going through all of them; Gawker has the full list.

Octavia Spencer, from “The Help”, got an Oscar nod. She will also be honored at the Black Women in Hollywood luncheon on Feb. 23., receiving the Breakthrough Award. Ms. Spencer gives a canny and unpredictable performance in a film that is marginally realistic and one of the most insulting white-washes of a truly despicable era of the south. I guess the producers didn’t think anyone would watch it if they stripped away the cheekiness.

If you’re in to all sorts of movies, as I am, Mark Wahlberg’s “Contraband” was a trashy testosterone-filled roller coaster. I’m not a chick flick gal; I’ve never dragged a man to a single one. But action films of all sorts are a passion; as are what I consider B movies. But next time Wahlberg makes a movie like this he needs to call me to help him craft the female part. I mean, really, knowing you’re in danger and leaving your door ajar, but then not having a gun nearby? Rewrite! No decent action film female character would ever write that into her part. Damsel in distress days are o-v-e-r.

Ignore the awards, enjoy the movies.

…and enjoy your evening. Chat it up in the comments about anything you like, if you feel so inclined.

Read full story · Comments { 14 }

Press Harassment Continues

“I’m within my First Amendment rights, and I’m being taken out,” Fox shouted as he was led away. – Josh Fox arrested at hearing, Politico

Josh Fox is an Oscar-nominated filmmaker. His documentary “Gasland” helped expose the dangers of unregulated natural gas fracking.

Read full story · Comments { 3 }

Writer of Red Tails Not Invited to White House Screening



The film is by George Lucas and debuts this week, January 20. It has been 20 years in the making.

Pres. Obama had a screening of the film recently, but he didn’t invite the writer, John Ridley, which was confirmed today on “Morning Joe.” He “didn’t make the cut.” His wife was not amused.

I hope everyone puts this film on your calendar.

The Tuskegee Airmen are a phenomenal part of history that deserves to be celebrated, commemorated and remembered.

My Uncle Dick would have saluted these men.

We can do so ourselves by seeing this film.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Read full story · Comments { 12 }

Romney Takes Big Lead in South Carolina

**UPDATED**

Mitt Romney’s opened a whopper of a lead in South Carolina. Who says negative attacks can’t work, this time in reverse, especially when they shoot as wildly as When Mitt Romney Came To Town, and go well wide of the mark.

The poll showed 37 percent of South Carolina Republican voters back Romney. Congressman Ron Paul and former Senator Rick Santorum tied for second place with 16 percent support.

Gingrich, a former speaker of the House of Representatives, has fallen far back after holding a strong lead in South Carolina in December. He was in fourth place at 12 percent in the Reuters/Ipsos poll.

[update] However, the consensus is that though Mitt Romney is ahead, it’s not by nearly as much as the Reuters/IPSO’s poll claims.

As you’ll see from the video above, individual stories continue to follow Mitt Romney everywhere. One unemployed woman said God told her to find him, which resulted in Romney giving her cash.

“God didn’t tell me to go to nobody else, he told me to pray for Romney,” said Williams, when asked why she has decided to support Romney. “I listened to the Lord.”

Newt Gingrich is now getting booed for his efforts against Mitt Romney and capitalism.

It’s got to be a sobering moment for some Democratic partisans readying the confetti guns, thinking that Bain Capital will be an easy shoot and score for them. Scalpel approach could prove deadly, but when has any campaign not preferred a machete? I’m still not convinced there won’t be ways around it for Romney, especially since the people most appalled are very likely not going to vote for him anyway.

Rick Santorum got too little way too late from “150 Christian leaders, business leaders and conservative activists” who endorsed him yesterday.

From the in case you missed it on Friday files, Standard & Poor’s went wild, playing slasher Over There.

S&P lowered its long-term rating on Cyprus, Italy, Portugal and Spain by two notches, and cut its rating on Austria, France, Malta, Slovakia and Slovenia by one notch.

The move puts highly indebted Italy on the same BBB+ level as Kazakhstan and pushes Portugal into junk status.

The credit-rating agency affirmed the current long-term ratings for Belgium, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Luxembourg and the Netherlands.

Americans for Prosperity, a Koch backed group, is doing a $5 million ad buy against Pres. Obama on Solyndra, which will hit during the State of the Union on January 24.

On SOPA, the White House tries to straddle the issue (I know, you’re shocked), while lawmakers are getting creamed by constituents (keep those emails and phone calls coming). From EFF:

Looks like proponents of the Internet Blacklist Bills are finally beginning to realize that they won’t be able to ram through massive, job-killing legislation without a fight. First, Sen. Patrick Leahy, sponsor of the PROTECT-IP Act (PIPA), announced on Thursday that he would recommend that the Senate further study the dangerous DNS blocking provisions in that bill before implementation. Then, a group of six influential senators wrote to Sen. Harry Reid, the Senate Majority Leader, urging that the Senate slow down and postpone the upcoming vote on PIPA. Sen. Ben Cardin, a co-sponsor of PIPA, also took a measured stance against the bill, saying he “would not vote for final passage of PIPA, as currently written.” Cardin cited consituent activism as the primary reason for the about-face.

Oh, and if you’re thinking of seeing the film Iron Lady, you should reconsider.

Read full story · Comments { 7 }

Margaret Thatcher Deserves Better

This film is dreadful.

If the trailer above was actually representative of the final product you would have had something worthy of the woman who ruled Great Britain with an iron will. However, the trailer is not the journey you take with Meryl Streep as Margaret Thatcher in Iron Lady.

That the film actually disrespects and marginalizes a woman as large as Margaret Thatcher is movie making malpractice.

Peter Travers is his review long before the film broke, elevates the premise of it to “a kind of female spin on King Lear” and is seduced by this torturous view of Thatcher from the world of dementia.

But why anyone would take the subject of Margaret Thatcher and reduce the drama by putting the lens inside her brain as she declines into this state is beyond me, especially since the way it’s done dwarfs her life, which was of major significance.

Conservatives would be right in encouraging their readers, audiences and talk radio listeners to stay far away from this travesty. People like Bill O’Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Laura Ingraham and others have the power to make an impact if they do.

It’s easy to understand why the filmmakers and producers would think people would jump to see Meryl Streep as Margaret Thatcher and I’m not surprised in the least she won the Golden Globe for her performance. Playing the role of Margaret Thatcher is an actor’s dream, but delivering a performance of someone of Thatcher’s stature in the throes of dementia is the ultimate test of the actor’s actual craft.

If you want to know the seriousness of the filmmakers, in Ms. Streep’s acceptance speech she said, We made this for 25 cents in 5 minutes. This says it all. Weinstein & company obviously had little to no respect for what the subject of Margaret Thatcher required and earned, but obviously didn’t care. Betting on Streep is never money ill spent.

However, it’s unfathomable that anyone could read the initial screenplay and decide to accept the premise, especially given the richness of the woman’s life that could have been mined to great dramatic impact and historic relevance.

Meryl Streep is truly at her best as the aging Thatcher, made possible through the wondrous makeup artistry of Marese Langan. It’s just too bad Streep is stuck in a film that offers no hope of her soaring, regardless of Streep’s herculean talents, which seem boxed in by the dryness of the vision. It’s hard not to pity poor Jim Broadbent, as her husband hallucination Denis Thatcher, who is reduced to a comic distraction and annoyance, though through no fault of his own.

Director Phyllida Lloyd, who also did Mama Mia with Streep, fumbles her way through the film with Abi Morgan’s screenplay not worthy of its subject or that actors’ performances. I’ll wait for any film directed by Lloyd to come to cable from now on.

Margaret Thatcher was a larger than life figure when she was in British politics, a historic leader, but when you consider her gender, not to mention her philosophy and leadership style and choices, her arrival on the world stage was important. What she did and the politics she employed were groundbreaking and horrifying, especially to a liberal like myself, her embrace of austerity and personal coldness to the plights of people worthy of dissection and depiction.

That this film comes in 2012, as economic austerity hits Europe, offers huge opportunities and Ms. Streep’s performance teases what might have been.

A controversial conservative giant, Margaret Thatcher seen through her decline and reminiscences is a legitimate choice, but the fact that the telling through this lens turns sour as you watch and leaves the viewer with only a paltry sense of who Mrs. Thatcher was in history is why this film not only falls flat, but is a cheap imitation to what is required when the subject is so large.

That Iron Lady needed to be sold through a trailer like the one above is simple. No matter how brilliant Streep’s performance, and it’s all that, a representative clip showing the majority of the film with Margaret Thatcher fighting dementia would have turned off audiences in droves and for very good reasons.


This piece has been updated upon Ms. Streep winning the Golden Globe.

Read full story · Comments { 9 }

What Corporations Do

Taking away people’s rights to access the courts is not that new for corporations. It has been going on for more than 25 years. It has been done through legislation, judicial elections, contractually and supported by a massive, corporate-funded public relations campaign. – Signing away constitutional rights, by Susan Saladoff


Ms. Saladoff is the director of the film above, “Hot Coffee,” now available through HBO. Can you imagine getting hurt by a corporation’s negligence and not being able to get redress?

I think of Lily Ledbetter.

I also think of the hypocrisy of people on the right like presidential candidate Rick Santorum, who rails against lawyers and our rights to address wrongs, while his own wife rightly avails herself of these very things. From the Des Moines Register back in November 2011:

Former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum said Thursday he sees no inconsistency between his support for legal reforms and his wife being awarded a $175,000 judgment in a past medical malpractice lawsuit.

Karen Santorum, a former nurse and a nonpracticing attorney, was initially awarded $350,000 by a jury in 1999 after she claimed a Virginia chiropractor’s negligence caused her permanent back pain. A judge subsequently cut the award in half, saying it was excessive. Her suit originally sought $500,000.

As Ms. Saladoff said to Stephen Colbert, a lawsuit is never frivolous if it’s your own.

Oh, and speaking of things corporations do.

I was a writer on the web before ICANN, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, was even conceived, taking me back to 1996 and the wild, wild west web. An article recently got my attention. Here’s a snippet that tells the story:

ICANN’s plan to open up the domain name space to new top level domains is scheduled to begin January 12, 2012. This long overdue implementation is the result of an open process that began in 2006. It would, in fact, be more realistic to say that the decision has been in the works 15 years; i.e., since early 1997. That is when demand for new top-level domain names, and the need for other policy decisions regarding the coordination of the domain name system, made it clear that a new institutional framework had to be created. ICANN was the progressive and innovative U.S. response to that need. It was created to become a nongovernmental, independent, truly global and representative policy development authority.

The result has been far from perfect, but human institutions never are. Over the past 15 years, every stakeholder with a serious interest in the issue of top level domains has had multiple opportunities to make their voice heard and to shape the policy. The resulting new gTLD policy reflects that diversity and complexity. From our point of view, it is too regulatory, too costly, and makes too many concessions to content regulators and trademark holders. But it will only get worse with delay. The existing compromise output that came out of the process paves the way for movement forward after a long period of artificial scarcity, opening up new business opportunities.

Now there is a cynical, illegitimate last-second push by a few corporate interests in the United States to derail that process.

That “cynical, illegitimate last-second push” is being aided by Sen. Jay Rockefeller, with the goals obvious. Freezing the Internet so that it’s forever 1996, with no expansion ability at all. It’s preposterous and as someone who has been deeply involved in the business of the web for 16 years as a new-media writer, it’s obvious how catastrophic a delay would be.

I’ll let a tech expert explain it:

Imagine the centrifugal forces that are unleashed as a result. Imagine the impact in Russia, China, Brazil, India, South Africa, and even the EU, when they are told in no uncertain terms that ICANN’s policy making is hostage to the whims of a few well-placed, narrowly focused U.S. business interests; that they can invest thousands of person-hours and resources to working in that framework only to see the rug pulled out from under them by a campaign by the ANA and an editorial by the New York Times. The entire institutional infrastructure we have spent 15 years trying will be drained of its life.

I’m not saying all corporations are evil.

My late brother in law, Stephen Simon, was the Vice President of Exxon-Mobil, the exceptional oil man I called him. Though we agreed to disagree on some of his company’s actions, Steve labored every day to make a difference in his industry, even if the corporation for whom he worked made it tough. When he learned I joined forces at one point with the causes of Robert Redford, then Al Gore, regarding climate change, I got a delivery of all kinds of information to read. I’ll also never forget the anonymous tips I got from insider oil men when BP blew in the Gulf, so there are many with a conscience.

I learned a long time ago to never paint with a broad brush.

However, as you can see from the examples above, sometimes what corporations do is in the best interests of their own profit motive, which is a businesses primary goal, but comes at the expense of the individual or even the collective progress of people in general.

Sometimes things are complex, then at other times it’s simple.

I bet you wouldn’t be surprised at all to learn that the Association of National Advertisers, a formidable lobbying list, is raging against ICANN.

It’s what corporations do.

Read full story · Comments { 5 }

Gallup and Matt Damon Reveal that 1979 Feeling Yet Again

“You know, a one-term president with some balls who actually got stuff done would have been, in the long run of this country, much better,” argues the We Bought a Zoo star. – Matt Damon

I’ve written about this twice, this year and once in 2010. Gallup shows us the graph proving that 1979 feeling persists.

It’s separate from Pres. Obama’s approval rating right now, because there is no Republican challenger.

The difference in 1979 and now is the issue bothering Americans. In 1979, the main issue for most was American respect and international position, even though economics certainly was part of it. The hostage crisis, however, Desert One and the feeling that Pres. Carter couldn’t impact anything drove the electorate.

Today “it’s the economy, stupid,” once again, with voters liking Pres. Obama, but their belief he can alter our economic trajectory is weak. Obama’s approval has risen nationally, but state to state is a different picture entirely and that’s how presidencies are won.

Pres. Obama remains beatable, but it will not be easy, nor will his reelection, depending on whom Republicans nominate.

I remain of the belief that Mitt Romney will prevail. Sol, let’s say for this argument he does. The question is whether in the current climate of incumbent disapproval and voter dissatisfaction with the big two parties, Pres. Obama can inspire independents to reunite behind his presidency, with their approval now at around 38%? Will young people reignite? African Americans are behind him, but will a big enough Hispanic majority pick Obama?

Why Hispanics would vote Republican is still in question. Romney is no Jeb Bush on the issue of immigration; he’s not even Newt Gingrich. However, in a state like Nevada, with its large Hispanic population, will dissatisfaction with the current economic trajectory and the horrific housing crisis in that state give Republicans the edge?

The foundational feeling inside the country remains reminiscent of 1979. It’s just that Republicans have no one close to Ronald Reagan’s political talents, which very well could make the difference, which will be slight. That is, if Republicans pick Mitt Romney, though he’s got enough baggage of his own to make Obama’s case against him strong.

It’s just not a given that the flip flop line, which is apt for Romney, will matter as it did with John Kerry, especially since Americans liking Obama does’t equate to giving him four more years on the economy.

If non-aligned voters and Democratic and Republican malcontents believe that Mitt Romney can turn the “malfunctioning corporation” known as the United States of America around, to paraphrase Gordon Gecko, the man Obama reelect is going to model their attack on Romney around. There’s a 50-50 chance they’ll give him a shot.

This post has been updated.

Read full story · Comments { 8 }

Daniel Craig and Rooney Mara’s Erotically Visceral Volcano

David Fincher plays Santa Claus to adults this Christmas with a R-rated thriller that is sadistically brilliant, red hot and freezing at the same time. Violence is employed efficiently to answer evil, frighteningly effective as a necessary human tool for fractured reality.

People who have lived any part of their life on an edge will understand.

It’s spellbinding. Emotionally gutting and satiating if you’ve ever hungered for revenge. An investment delivered for adults who too many times come away from today’s films still starved.

Without saying anything about the plot, for those who don’t know the substance of the diabolical ride that pulls everything and everyone apart, as a feminist you sometimes want to scream with Rooney Mara.

Ms. Mara’s performance is the stuff of sensual explosiveness mixed with the curse of genius, naïveté and the haunting reality of her own unbendable soul’s code.

It is always impossible to take your eyes off of Daniel Craig.

“Girl with the Dragon Tattoo” takes you into the heart’s tortured wilderness and makes you want to take the journey again. It doesn’t matter the ending.

The Los Angeles Times has a compilation of reviews.

To answer Salon’s Andrew O’Hehir’s question: Do we really need an entire new series of these films?”

Emphatically, yes. To deprive would be torture, just like parts of this film.

Read full story · Comments { 2 }

House Republicans Decide to Die Like ‘Braveheart’

“Out of 75 responses, there may have been one person that thought it was OK that we would put the fight off until two months from now,” he continued. “Everybody else said, ‘Look, this is a ‘Braveheart’ moment. You, Mr. Speaker, are our William Wallace. Let’s rush to the fight. Get us back to Washington, let’s get to our work and we’re doing that.’” – Rep. Phil Gingrey: It’s our “Braveheart moment”

The DCCC has unleashed the Kracken, aka James Carville.

I can’t bear to analyze this kabuki again.

Segue to Brian Beutler:

But after a stunning rebellion by House Republicans, Boehner has publicly committed to killing the compromise. Assuming he follows through, that’ll reset the debate to some extent. Senate Democrats have told Boehner they’re done for the year. Acting as Boehner’s proxy, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell negotiated an agreement that was designed to pass the House, he gave Majority Leader Harry Reid the greenlight to adjourn until after the holidays, and then Boehner reneged — this is his problem.

But while that’s an argument almost everybody in Washington — or everyone who watched this weekend’s events unfold — agrees with, it won’t necessarily translate into voter pressure on House Republicans. If the Senate bill goes down in the House tonight, and the only people left in Washington are Boehner and his caucus demanding in the national media that Senate Dems return from vacation to resume negotiations, the politics will change. Reid’s threats could easily prove unsustainable, and he may be forced back to Capitol Hill to convene the Senate and appoint members to a conference committee.

NBC’s First Read had a simpler take: here we go again. That about nails it.

Read full story · Comments { 8 }

Rick Perry’s Latest Oops

With Newt Gingrich now capturing the wild imaginings of the rabid right primary voter, it’s no wonder Rick Perry’s been reduced to this latest stunt. The ad is titled “Strong.” It divided the Perry campaign, according to a report by Sam Stein.

But not everyone was comfortable with the script. When the ad was being crafted several weeks ago, Perry’s top pollster, Tony Fabrizio, called it “nuts,” according to an email sent from Fabrizio to the ad’s main creator, longtime GOP operative Nelson Warfield. In a separate email to The Huffington Post, Warfield confirmed that the ad was made over Fabrizio’s objections.

“Tony was against it from the get-go,” Warfield wrote. “It was the source of some extended conversation in the campaign. To be very clear: That spot was mine from writing the poll question to test[ing] it to drafting the script to overseeing production.”

The folks over at Americablog noticed something special about the ad, Perry’s jacket, with the photo below coming from them.

If you haven’t had your complete fill of Rick Perry, check out Vanity Fair‘s January issue. From “the rumors about gay affairs” to the “painkiller use,” it’s brutal.

Some people just aren’t meant for the national stage. But his fashion choice in “Strong” really is quite precious.

Read full story · Comments { 15 }

Did the Right Scare NPR into Not Covering Occupy Wall Street Protests?

In America, it takes a celebrity.

Occupy Wall Street is not getting enough coverage by traditional news and cable organizations, but also news outlets that you’d think would cover it. Michael Moore and Susan Sarandon have joined in hoping to raise the profile of the protests. From Bloomberg:

Wall Street Protesters Joined by Susan Sarandon

“I’m here to understand what’s going on and to lend my support,” Sarandon, who won an Academy Award for best actress for her role in the 1995 film “Dead Man Walking,” said in an interview. “There’s a lot of different kinds of people here who want to shift the paradigm to something that’s addressing the huge gap between the rich and the poor.”

Keith Olbermann smacked NPR last night for ignoring the Occupy Wall Street protests until things got dramatic. I tweeted Olbermann’s quote: “If it bleeds, it leads on NPR.” They’re taking a lot of heat for their lack of coverage:

Newsworthy? Determining the Importance of Protests on Wall Street

But the online posts were not enough for Daniel Clay from Atlanta, GA, who wrote, “Does NPR think this is unimportant? Are you going to wait for someone to die or commit serious violence before you give it the attention it deserves?”

We asked the newsroom to explain their editorial decision. Executive editor for news Dick Meyer came back: “The recent protests on Wall Street did not involve large numbers of people, prominent people, a great disruption or an especially clear objective.”

It makes you wonder if the right-wing targeting and funding scare NPR recently went through sent such a chill down the ranks it’s keeping them from covering the story. After all, donors matter, especially ones connected to Wall Street. The House is also run by Republicans and fueled by the Tea Party. It makes you wonder.

Read full story · Comments { 4 }

Dyncorp, Sex Trafficking, the UN and ‘The Whistleblower’

The movie debuts this weekend, with “Morning Joe” and Jon Stewart among those helping get the word out. The buzz has been huge.

Kathryn Bolkovac is still fighting to get the U.N. to do something about what she proved. The story goes like this, from 2001

A former United Nations police officer is suing a British security firm over claims that it covered up the involvement of her fellow officers in sex crimes and prostitution rackets in the Balkans.

Kathryn Bolkovac, an American policewoman, was hired by DynCorp Aerospace in Aldershot for a UN post aimed at cracking down on sexual abuse and forced prostitution in Bosnia.

She claims she was ‘appalled’ to find that many of her fellow officers were involved. She was fired by the British company after amassing evidence that UN police were taking part in the trafficking of young women from eastern Europe as sex slaves.

She said: ‘When I started collecting evidence from the victims of sex trafficking it was clear that a number of UN officers were involved from several countries, including quite a few from Britain. I was shocked, appalled and disgusted. They were supposed to be over there to help, but they were committing crimes themselves. When I told the supervisors they didn’t want to know.’

Read full story · Comments { 1 }

Matt Damon on Teachers

Pres. Obama has already telegraphed that he’s ready to work with Republicans, as the Administration prepares to privatize education, while changing the public school system under the mantel of “reform.”

Matt Damon played offense recently and he effusively heaped praise on the teachers who don’t get paid enough and take way too much grief for what they are paid.

But this is when Austerity’s grip, the need for more and better schools, and partnerships with businesses wanting to help offer more options tend to make some people simply ask Why not?

It’s not about qualified teachers with experience getting a living wage and some control over the task they’ve been asked to do.

Over to you.. …

Read full story · Comments { 9 }

Tea Party Politics is Crazy, But They Won

“The “hobbits” won.”Mark Thiessen

This is what happens when the man in the White House doesn’t have the leadership character for the job.

As for all those analysts, including a lot of progressives and new media sites, who tried to stuff the Tea Party in the racist bin thinking that would be enough, you have been humiliated by the small government crew that was at the foundation of what became an astroturf movement the media glommed on to, while Democrats actually believed they weren’t for real.

Corporate wingnut titans can funnel money into a movement, but if they don’t have front men and women with principle who’ll go down for the cause it hardly matters. Yes, there are racists in the Tea Party, no doubt about it, but by overplaying the theme while amateurs railed against Washington, Democrats and progressives missed the movement’s power by a mile. The carnage left today is the result.

It all began with Sarah Palin, which progressives and new media sites ignored or vilified. Her power has risen and she’s finally fallen, but through health care and the 2010 election, no person was more powerful or impacted the Tea Party presence more than Sarah, allowing them to take center stage in Washington and accomplish the defeat of progressive economics, because their opponent, Pres. Obama, wasn’t up to the job.

Having a pretty spokes model has worked before and the Democrats were no more prepared for Palin and the Tea Party than they were for Ronald Reagan. Democrats and progressives should just count their lucky stars that Palin is gone and Michele Bachmann’s lack of maleness makes her an untenable choice for the GOP boys’ club who seem to be hoping the televangelist huckster Rick Perry can do it for them, as Mitt Romney faces a whole new set of very real challenges to his candidacy. Pres. Obama may be the Democratic poison political pill, but he’d beat Perry in a walk.

With Fox News Channel behind the Tea Party, just like they did during the Bush era, Republicans and the mighty Right, however wrong their policies, have pummeled the Democratic party and progressives into submission, at least for the moment, through the rise of Obamanomics.

So, it’s time to give credit where it’s due and it’s not to political analysts like Lawrence O’Donnell who not only blew the McConnell call, but also his analysis on Obama, while huffing and puffing for 20 minutes every night in his opener and saying absolutely nothing worth remembering today.

Obamanomics is here and the country is stuck with it; an orphaned idea hollowly culled from Republicanism that ignores jobs and growth for cuts, cuts, cuts, while discounting that it’s the middle class and “working stiffs” who fuel demand that inspires corporations to create jobs in the first place.

The Tea Party played Pres. Obama and the Democratic party for the craven, purposeless, unmotivated political class they are; a group of individuals who stand for nothing but promoting celebrity over philosophical muscle that may not be perfect, but has at its heart the welfare of the people above all.

While the details of the debt ceiling deal remain fuzzy, this much is clear: Barack Obama may be president, but the Tea Party is now running Washington.Peter Beinert

Read full story · Comments { 19 }

Fear of Making the Wrong Kind of History

Mr. Boehner now has the GOP positioned in sight of a political and policy victory. If his plan or something close to it becomes law, Democrats will have conceded more spending cuts than they thought possible, and without getting the GOP to raise taxes and without being able to blame Republicans for a debt-limit crackup or economic damage. If conservatives defeat the Boehner plan, they’ll not only undermine their House majority. They’ll go far to re-electing Mr. Obama and making the entitlement state that much harder to reform. – The GOP’s Reality Test – Republicans who oppose Boehner’s debt deal are playing into Obama’s hands.

The devil is now the possibility of the U.S. being downgraded, with no details on how to stop it at this point. But with the Tea Party caucus showing Ben Affleck’s “The Town” to get psyched up it’s clear Boehner and Obama are dealing with the an alternate reality on the Right.

Avoiding financial downgrade is now Pres. Obama’s biggest problem. To become the first president in history to preside over a financial downgrade of the U.S. AAA rating is not going to help Obama’s 2012 marketing or his already sliding support on his handling of the economy. Frantic to avoid this calamity, it’s all hands working behind the scenes:

In a recent interview with POLITICO, David T. Beers, head of sovereign ratings at S&P, said the July 14th report was not a major shift and simply reflected an increased concern that there is no clear path to significant deficit reduction.

“What we are focused on is not the debt ceiling but the underlying state of public finances,” said Beers, a London-based executive who has conducted multiple meetings with administration officials.

In order to maintain a triple-A rating, Beers said, “what would have to emerge would be something that has a material impact on the underlying fiscal issues.”

“None of us know what this agreement is going to look like,” Beers said. “For us to think it is credible it would first of all have to show some choices about what the fiscal priorities are and be actionable in ways that would give us confidence that it is going to be implemented.”

Pres. Obama and the White House pushing aside a simple debt ceiling increase is now looking like a colossal error. Floating the “grand bargain” without getting support on the Democratic side comes close behind, because the furor behind the debt ceiling talks and the failed attempts at tying it to future deficit reduction has helped trigger wider doubts about the ability of Congress to come to any agreement at all.

This is the type of thing that could inspire S&P and rating agencies to lower the boom.

It’s just one reason why the Wall Street Journal is going to bat for Boehner, joined by the Chamber of Commerce, even if his plan “if enacted, it could well produce the greatest increase in poverty and hardship produced by any law in modern U.S. history,” according to the CPBB.

As the White House does all it can to avert a credit downgrade washing over Obama’s presidency, which would log the wrong kind of history for Democrats.

Establishment Republicans are freaked out over what the Tea Party is accomplishing at their expense, which is rendering everyone powerless to manage what used to be an easy bet.

This will give you an idea of just how out of control the Republican Tea Party caucus has become and the cost of letting amateur ideological zealots have keys to the kingdom (h/t Yglesias).

House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), the party’s vote counter, began his talk by showing a clip from the movie, “The Town”, trying to forge a sense of unity among the independent-minded caucus. [...] After showing the clip, Rep. Allen West (R-Fla.), one of the most outspoken critics of leadership among the 87 freshmen, stood up to speak, according to GOP aides.

“I’m ready to drive the car,” West replied, surprising many Republicans by giving his full -throated support for the plan.

However, a leading conservative lawmaker, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), said enough Republicans appear to oppose Boehner’s plan that it would not be able to pass the House on GOP support alone.

Read full story · Comments { 22 }

’1776′ John Adams: One Useless Man is Called a Disgrace; Two are Called a Law Firm; Three or More Become a Congress


… Lincoln saw an unresolvable tension between the Constitution of a democratic republic and the policies of aggrandizement and intemperate self-interest that lead from the manners of freedom to the slavish love of power. He spoke of the difference between the work of establishing a constitutional republic and the longer task of maintaining it. But maintaining it against what? Lincoln’s answer was always the same: against the internal pressure of greed, and the external pressure of war. The predicament of the country in 1861, he said, “forces us to ask: ‘Is there, in all republics, this inherent, and fatal weakness? Must a government, of necessity, be too strong for the liberties of its own people, or too weak to maintain its own existence?’”

We are now ten years into a policy shared by two successive administrations to plant a new understanding of the spirit of the laws in America. That policy has pretended there is a “trade-off” between liberty and security, and that in a time of crisis, security ought to have the upper hand. The Cheney-Bush and Obama administrations have accustomed us to laws and language concerned above all with the “protection” of citizens — as if there were something higher or more worth protecting than the liberty that is guaranteed by our laws and the framework of laws, the Constitution. [...]

To Maintain a Republic, by David Bromwich

Read full story · Comments { 5 }

C’est Magnifique


If you love Paris, you’ll fall head over heels for this film.

It will eventually take it’s place as one of Woody Allen’s finest. As “Manhattan” was a love letter to New York City, “Midnight in Paris” is to this magical city.

The premise of the film is something that’s blown through my mind innumerable times, as I’ve been having an affair with Paris for quite some time. It started long ago, because of my artistic beginnings, but once I set foot on French soil I was a goner.

How many times have you walked through Paris and ended up lost? It’s a right of passage for anyone perusing the Persian streets.

It’s the 4th of July weekend, see a movie. Start with “Midnight in Paris.”

Read full story · Comments { 2 }

Bachmann Makes Palin Seem Like Old News Now

PELLA, Iowa — Sarah Palin stared a bit uncomfortably at a movie screen Tuesday night watching a montage of Matt Damon, David Letterman, Madonna, Howard Stern, Bill Maher, Louis C.K. and other celebrities malign her, then asked The Hollywood Reporter: “What would make someone be so full of hate?” – The Hollywood Reporter

Nothing will keep the press from following Sarah Palin around like lap dogs.

“I’m very grateful that someone would bother to go to these efforts to make a documentary about the record of my team in Alaska that worked so hard for energy security and ethics reform and privatizing businesses that should never be in government’s hands,” Palin said. “This film really is a great illustration of what it is that you can accomplish as a team, a bipartisan approach, just common-sense solutions to some tough issues. We tackled it, we succeeded, and someone went to the trouble of documenting what it was that we accomplished. I appreciate that, so that brings me to Iowa.” – Real Clear Politics

I’m more amused than anything with the hoopla following the infomercial masquerading as a film that reinvents Sarah Palin through her Alaskan political career, which she chose to quit for greener pastures via her never ending publicity tour. Her political relevancy at this point is at the lowest ebb we’ve seen since she blasted on to the scene as McCain’s vice presidential nominee. The credibility she built up before the 2010 midterms a distant memory.

Sarah Palin faces an uncomfortable reality, even as she teases about 2012 saying, “We’re still thinking about that.” She’s allowed Michele Bachmann to take over where she left off, with Bachmann appearing infinitely more articulate, professional and determined to be a political force inside the Republican Party, which is becoming a reality as she moves up into the cat bird seat in the GOP primary contest, though there’s a long way to go and fading is always a possibility.

Why would Tea Party activists and other conservatives looking for an alternative to Romney and the establishment pols choose Palin over Bachmann at this point? There’s no logical reason, though partisan politics is driven by emotion, which is the only thing that could make the difference.

Still, Bachmann has the same political platform as Palin only she’s stayed in the arena. Bachmann isn’t a media coward, no matter how she trips over her own tongue, something both women have in common, unfortunately. Palin’s scared of unfriendly media, unlike Bachmann, who shows the maturity needed for national politics, with Palin’s policy prowess now reduced to Twitter and Facebook belches. Additionally, with Bachmann at 65% or so approval in Iowa, as a home state girl, why would notoriously conservative Iowans switch to Palin?

Shrouded in the aura of 2008 and the disaster gaffes everyone can recite by heart, Palin looks far less interesting, though her fans continue to flock around her. This is the real dilemma she faces in the charade she’s concocting surrounding whether she’ll run for president. How can she stiff her fans? What will happen to her career if she doesn’t run, which seems the most likely choice, because the obstacles loom large. Fox talking head is all she’s got.

Where would Sarah get the money to run? Bachmann has proven a formidable financing foe, with there no evidence Palin has the backers to pull off a presidential run at this point. She’ll need a political sugar daddy to manage it, which isn’t out of the question, especially with her adoring fans holding their breath for her pending announcement.

Sarah Palin simply looks like old news today, a wannabe political star who decided to choose celebrity, fan cultivation and media gamesmanship to become the most popular Fox News babe who amazingly isn’t blonde.

Read full story · Comments { 4 }