TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Tag Archives | podcasts

TM-DC Podcast: Obama at the Brink

The latest podcast is up.

TM-DC Podcast

Listen now!

Afghanistan meets health care, the little lies edition, with culture on the side. Your humble hostess quite pissed off at the moment. Long ago realizing that whatever happens in Congress is likely a foregone conclusion, with Pelosi’s behavior regarding Stupak-Pitts foreshadowing of worse to come, which certainly has at this point. Sen. Nelson still waiting for his Lieberman prize, which, if done, will come on the backs of women. Ezra Klein and Joe Klein could care less, their access still intact. Women’s issues so petty, really. Dr. Howard Dean someone, who knows health care inside and out, the latest target of the Pass Anything coalition.

Some of you may remember Betsy, who came to this site after the primary season. She commented on my Facebook page yesterday:

Lieberman is disgusting. I’m furious with the entire Democratic party. To think I switched party for change, what a damn laugh. I agree with Howard Dean. vote down the bill in the Senate. Harry Reid is a creep and a sleaze. THese guys all are just concerned with themselves, not the American people.

Congressional Democrats, meanwhile, feel they have to save Pres. Obama, otherwise the next few years are going to be brutal. Besides, that’s their job.

But writing that Democrats have to save Pres. Obama, otherwise the next few years are going to be brutal is quite a turn around from where this all began. Remember? The wind was at Obama’s back, the world at his feet, with articles being written that conservatism was done. That’s how badly Barack Obama has mismanaged his first year in office.

The ABC/Washington Post poll came out after I taped the podcast. It’s bad news for Obama, except for his moves on Afghanistan, which he solidified from Oslo, something that is a relief in my view. An excerpt:

On the economy, 52 percent disapprove, a majority for the first time. On the deficit, his worst score, 56 percent disapprove. Such numbers aren’t unexpected; Ronald Reagan, in similar economic straits, dropped to 52 percent overall approval at this point in his presidency. But it’s not just the economy: Fifty-three percent also disapprove of Obama’s work on health care, and the public by 51-44 percent now opposes the reform package in Congress – both more than half for the first time in ABC/Post polls.

Also this:

The erosion in Obama’s standing has been driven by continued slippage among political independents, particularly among independent men. For the first time, a majority of independents disapprove of his overall job performance, and independents’ disapproval of his handling of health care and the economy now tops six in 10.

See Jon Walker.

Believe it or not, the American people are not as stupid as politicians think. Even if they don’t get the health care legislation in it’s entirety, since no one yet knows what the bill will look like, they can sure as hell sense that politicians leading this parade toward a cliff don’t either. Looking at their own lives they also know one thing. People can’t afford for things to get worse for their families. So the convoluted conversation coming at them on big ticket items like health care and the economy is just not selling. It sounds like too big a gamble.

It’s been a long time since I’ve been this pissed off, which is evident in the podcast. Hard to swallow how thoroughly the Democrats have botched the health care debate, with Pres. Obama now asking all of us to suck it up for him. Because if he doesn’t get this bill passed the humiliation will be epic, as will the thunderous applause from the right.

There is no way, however, Pres. Obama or the Democrats have earned the benefit of the doubt on faith that they will improve this current nightmare of legislation, so I’m convinced that giving them a pass would just enable them. Sending a message that no matter how badly they suck we have to support them, because they’re better than the wingnuts.

However, if we’re not getting anything progressive, while being asked to save these idiots after one incompetent move after another, I’m just not feeling how that gets us anywhere but another trip round the hamster wheel.

Obviously, I’ve got some cooling off to do.

 
Read full story · Comments { 33 }

12.16.09: Afghanistan, Obama Screws Up Health Care, Tiger Doping?


Photobucket 

Read full story · Comments are closed

TM-DC PODCAST: An Interview with Martha Coakley

extensive update below

TM-DC podcast

Listen now!

“To pretend that now the House has passed this bill is real progress – it’s at the expense of women’s access to reproductive rights,” Ms. Coakley said in an interview on WTKK-FM, a Boston radio station. She is currently the frontrunner in the race. – Candidates in Mass. Senate Race Spar Over Stupak Measure

The above quote is similar to what Martha Coakley said in the interview we did last night. She made it clear that if she’d been in the House she simply could not have voted for the bill, because of the Stupak amendment. Coakley also said that she wasn’t going to criticize anyone else for their vote, but that’s just how she saw it.

Martha Coakley stands in direct contrast to Nancy Pelosi and many others, who thought forwarding a bad health care bill was better than getting it right in the first place. You simply cannot eviscerate women’s civil rights, hoping you can change it later. You might get the chance, but what if you simply embolden those on the right? As a Democrat, you’ve changed everything and for what?

That evidently doesn’t phase Alan Khazei, the founder of the non-profit City Year, and Steven Pagiluca, Boston Celtics co-owner, Coakley’s challengers, both of whom would have supported the House bill.

Mr. Capuano, her opponent, in the Times article says he thinks that Coakley’s stance on Stupak is “manna from heaven” for his campaign. Capuano thinks that it’s “realism” to cave to the idea of Stupak, which is devastating to women’s health care. But wait! Now that he’s seen the shock waves from Stupak passing as part of the House bill, he’s flip flopped.

This is what I’m talking about when it comes to Martha Coakley. It doesn’t take a finger in the wind for her to decide what is right.

The late Sen. Ted Kennedy would be proud to have Martha Coakley, the current attorney general of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, take up where he left off, especially on health care. Ms. Coakley is sharp, frank and well qualified, reminding me of another female, whom I don’t dare mention for fear of what might ensue. The election is Dec. 8th. So if you know someone in Massachusetts, send out the word.

I wrote about many of the terrific women who have recently stood up against Stupak over at Huffington Post today. …and I’m not talking about Sen. Claire McCaskill, who had to see which way the wind was blowing before she came out strongly against Stupak.

Martha and I had a great conversation. An important one, because it’s clear after what we are experiencing, first with the House, but now the Senate with people like Ben Nelson, we all need to make sure that when strong, pro civil rights women run for office that we’re behind them. That goes for feminist men as well. Ones that also won’t invite the religious hierarchy into the process and let them write, or at the very least, okay legislation, especially when women’s civil rights are at stake.

There was also another conversation going on today on a similar subject. This one over at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., where women’s groups let Administration officials know that they weren’t happy about where things stood after Speaker Pelosi invited the Catholic Bishops in to make sure the Stupak amendment got an up or down vote. Via Jake Tapper:

White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, senior advisor Valerie Jarrett and Domestic Policy Council director Melody Barnes, health care reform czar Nancy-ann DeParle and other White House officials met with a dozen officials from liberal women’s and abortion right’s groups this afternoon where they had a “frank exchange,” in the words of one attendee. …

“Frank exchange.” I bet.

 
Read full story · Comments are closed

11.11.09 – An Interview with Martha Coakley, (running for Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat)


Photobucket 

Read full story · Comments are closed

TM-DC PODCAST: From Stupak to Ben Nelson and Bust

TM-DC podcast
Interview with “Jane Roe” and All You Need to Know About Stupak

Listen now!

Like this wasn’t predictable?

As soon as Stupak got wings, Ben Nelson took flight. He no doubt grabbed Sen. Casey on his way.

A key Senate centrist is “highly unlikely” to support any heath bill without an abortion provision similar to the House’s Stupak amendment.

“Senator Nelson is strongly pro-life and was pleased the Stupak amendment passed with such strong support,” said Nelson spokesman Jake Thompson. “He believes that no federal money—including subsidies or tax credits–should be used to buy insurance coverage for abortion.”

“This is a very important issue to Senator Nelson and it is highly unlikely he would support a bill that doesn’t clearly prohibit federal dollars from going to abortion,” Thompson said. …

Calling Mr. Nelson a “centrist” is equal to calling Joe Lieberman liberal.

While Massachusetts A.G. Martha Coakley, running for Ted Kennedy’s seat, so gets it. She’s also the only Democrat courageous enough to say that the Hyde amendment should be changed to represent current law.

Attorney General Martha Coakley said this morning that she would have voted against the landmark health care bill approved by the House over the weekend because it includes a provision restricting federal funding for providers of abortion services. [...]

… “The inclusion of the Stupak/Pitts amendment violates the very intent of health care reform, which is meant to guarantee quality, affordable health care coverage for everyone,” she said. “I believe that the Senate has a responsibility to fix this by eliminating the provision in whatever reform legislation moves forward.” …

DebCoop has a must read at Open Left, taking McCaskill to task and proving her wrong.

Listen to the podcast.

and remember, according to various conversations and emails received, the Senate will need 60 votes to get Stupak-esque language into the Senate bill, with the senators on the committee being pro-women (aka pro-choice). If the House letter sent to Pelosi is any indication, it’s a good bet that those involved in the conference on the House side will gladly accept the Senate bill, which will come sans Stupak. That is unless Democrats really want to scuttle health care legislation, something none of us can afford.

 
Read full story · Comments are closed

11.09.09 Stupak Storm and All You Need to Know About It


Photobucket 

Read full story · Comments are closed

Meanwhile, About Afghanistan…

The latest TM-DC podcast is up.

Listen now!

Last Friday I listened to Sect. Hillary Clinton give a speech at the first “No Limits” conference. This is Ann Lewis’ group made up of, well, the political arm of what’s left of Clinton’s 2008 campaign, though that’s my interpretation, not the official line. Clinton was subdued and substantively serious. At one point she addressed our involvement around the world: Why do we involve ourselves in conflicts that “are insoluable?” Her answer was simple: “It’s imperative for us to keep our eyes on where we want to lead the world,” as we “create space for good things to happen” around the world. If that doesn’t describe Afghanistan, nothing does, though to say most progressives haven’t embraced that one is an understatement.

It covers last week’s election, as well as my analysis of Clinton’s speech. Let’s just say she might have been subdued, but something happened at the end… Well, you’ll have to listen to find out. (…issues beyond health care, if you need a break from that one.)

szep_obama-karzai

President Obama deliberating on his Afghanistan strategy now has Fort Hood as a backdrop.

Jeffrey Goldberg doesn’t waste a moment digging down, deep and dumb on what it all means in “When Muslims Commit Violence,” which should read When Analysis Gets Stuck On Stupid.

It seems, though, that when an American military officer who is a practicing Muslim allegedly shoots forty of his fellow soldiers who are about to deploy to the two wars the United States is currently fighting in Muslim countries, some broader meaning might, over time, be discerned, especially if the officer did, in fact, yell “Allahu Akbar” while murdering his fellow soldiers, as some soldiers say he did. This is the second time this year American soldiers on American soil have been gunned down by a Muslim who was reportedly unhappy with America’s wars in the Middle East (the first took place in Arkansas, to modest levels of notice). And, of course, this would not be the first instance of an American Muslim soldier killing fellow soldiers over his disagreements with American foreign policy; in 2003, Army Sgt. Hasan Akbar killed two officers and wounded fourteen others when he rolled a grenade into a tent in a homicidal protest against American policy.

Shorter Jeffrey: It’s not at all about Muslims, except when it is.

It’s much simpler and certainly less incendiary. Some people are not equipped to hear soldiers’ horrific war stories without being severely affected themselves. Major Hasan was obviously one of them, as I talk about on the podcast.

All this as the dateline for more troops comes into focus. Next March, according to McClatchy, 34,000 could be the number:

President Barack Obama is nearing a decision to send more than 30,000 additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan next year, but he may not announce it until after he consults with key allies and completes a trip to Asia later this month, administration and military officials have told McClatchy.

As it now stands, the administration’s plan calls for sending three Army brigades from the 101st Airborne Division at Fort Campbell, Ky. and the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum, N.Y. and a Marine brigade, for a total of as many as 23,000 additional combat and support troops. …

Go back to Clinton’s words last Friday at the top of this post. Repeat them to yourself, add humanitarian obligation and the importance of women around the world to stabilizing nations, and it’s all you need to know.

 
Read full story · Comments are closed

11.6.09: Fort Hood; Election Fallout; Clinton Speech Today and Some POTUS Thoughts


Photobucket 

Read full story · Comments are closed

TM-DC Podcast: Dick Cheney Fun, Fox Battle, Foreign Policy

–bumped–

podcast

The new podcast is up

I just couldn’t resist having some fun on the podcast with Mr. Cheney’s latest screed. He’s so over the top he’s outdone himself on this one.

The White House response was pitch perfect. From Politico:

A day after former Vice President Cheney charged the Obama administration with “dithering” over its strategy for the war in Afghanistan, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs returned fire with guns blazing.

“What Vice President Cheney calls dithering, President Obama calls his solemn responsibility to the men and women in uniform,” Gibbs said Thursday. “I think we’ve all seen what happens when somebody doesn’t take that responsibility seriously.”

Also on the broadcast is health care, my conversation with Richard Holbrooke, the J Street conference next week, and much more, with a little about my appearance on Washington Journal, focusing on the reality that the public option really is popular, but also that the right has come out blasting by saying the latest polling model is bad. From Media Matters:

…with Fox News contributor Newt Gingrich reportedly claiming that “this poll was deliberately rigged and produced a result that’s fundamentally false” and that “It’s a typical Washington Post effort to slant the world in favor of liberal Democrats” and Rush Limbaugh calling the poll “totally fraudulent.”

Chris Cilizza has a column up on it as well describing the Republicans biggest problem: When only 20% of the American electorate identify themselves as Republicans it’s hard for a sample to have more than that in it. Someone tell the Fox crew, who totally embarrassed themselves through analysis that is pre-kindergarten level.

It just gives more steam to the ongoing Fox battle raging, which the video above from Media Matters proves is a worthy fight.

All this and more, including horrible job numbers, is covered on the podcast. Enjoy!

 
Read full story · Comments are closed

10.22.09 – Dick Cheney Fun, Reid-Health Care, Conversation w Holbrooke, Fox Battle

Photobucket 

Read full story · Comments are closed

TM-DC Podcast: From Bibi to Health Care & Terrorism

Enjoy the podcast. Also available via RSS feed, as well as ITunes.

Some links to go along with it are below, beyond topics I’ve covered this week.

On hot topics, Qadhafi’s translator collapses, plus much more in the much lighter side of the news; after all, this is a podcast, so entertainment is part of it. All before I get down to a lot of foreign policy talk. It’s been that kind of week.

The following broke after I recorded the broadcast, but it’s too good not to include. George Stephanopoulos, with Gates giving a classic response:

STEPHANOPOULOS: President Ahmadinejad says that President Obama is mistaken and the US owes Iran an apology. Is Iran going to get one?

GATES: Not a chance.

hillary_laurarozen
photo via Laura Rozen

Emily’s List is hitting Sen. Jon Kyl with a petition after yesterday.

What is being reported as a serious terrorist plot has been thwarted. Everyone is adding caveats to this story, however, because we’re all a little gun shy after the Bush-Cheney era of crying wolf. Something to keep your eyes on.

An explanation of what Netanyahu was railing against, the Goldstone report. However, not all Israelis appreciated Netanyahu’s rant.

CBO numbers being used to wrangle Blue Dogs.

…and something to ponder, as people from all over the political spectrum start weighing in negatively on Pres. Obama. Including one expert over at the New America Foundation, where I’ve got some friends, in a devastating post entitled “Obama the Impotent.”

On the other side, is Barack Obama and his administration “Folding Too Quickly to GOP Pressure”? One conservative thinks so and says why.

Okay, full disclosure. The writer of this article is from the conservative part of the political firmament. However, he’s struck by what seems like a relative lack of backbone in the Obama administration. As far as my side of the ideological divide goes, hey, great. We’ll push as much as we can to either get what we want or make sure that the left doesn’t get what it wants.

However, were this writer a Democrat, he might start getting a bit distraught over how quickly the Obama team caves on both principle and defense of its own supporters and colleagues. …

Obviously, the writer has been reading the smart comments In the News. Everyone encouraged to post (or comment) there. It’s easy.

Anyway, enjoy the podcast.

…oh, and about that picture above. It’s Secretary of State Hillary Clinton heading to cocktails after a hard day’s work during UNGA. No wonder I relate to her so well.

Read full story · Comments are closed

9.25.09 – From ‘You Lie’ to Iran, Bibi, Barack, Health Care, & Terrorism


Photobucket 

Read full story · Comments are closed

TM-DC Podcast: Teddy, the Kennedys, Carter, Hillary… and Right-Wing Haters

The podcast is up, which is available through ITunes (and RSS feed).

A lot of history remembering Teddy, but also the ending of an era. …and of course, if you’re covering an iconic Democrat, especially the last great Kennedy patriarch, the right-wing screed machine isn’t very far behind. Rush Limbaugh couldn’t wait to start, with Glenn Beck’s invoking of Paul Wellstone, with other wingnuts joining in, a case in sheer, unadulterated PANIC!

Emitting flop sweat, as Hannity does whenever he thinks of “The Kennedy Bill,” the right just doesn’t know what to do, especially considering they’ve got no leaders of any class, depth or star power, who know anything about anything, on their side. From Media Matters:

Hannity on Kennedy’s death: “a lot of this was the politicizing of — remember Paul Wellstone’s death?” Discussing Kennedy’s death during his radio program, Sean Hannity asserted, “We’ve got The Wall Street Journal reporting — and by the way, a lot of this was the politicizing of — remember Paul Wellstone’s death? You know, ‘Let’s do everything for Paul.’ And we’re now being implored to get behind Obamacare because it’s what Ted Kennedy would have wanted.” [The Sean Hannity Show, 8/26/09]

Christopher Hayes brings up a point on which there can be little disagreement:

It occurred to me that if Hillary Clinton had delivered word for word the same speech that Teddy Kennedy did in 1980, his famous, justly praised “The Dream Will Never Die” speech, Clinton would have been excoriated. Kennedy only mentioned Carter one time in that speech. Just sayin’.

That and Teddy’s passing got me to thinking. There has been much talk over the months and years, as people get to know the history of my politics, with people loving to remind me that I was a “Reagan Democrat,” as if it was some crime, especially given the time and temperature of Democratic politics, especially where foreign policy was concerned. See Iran hostage crisis, gas lines (designated days to fill my tank in New York City), Desert One…. Reminding me of when Teddy took on Carter in a primary challenge of all challenges, going all the way to the convention in 1980. When Teddy finally and officially lost the nomination, he could barely tolerate shaking Carter’s hand at the time, with this picture saying it all, Tip O’Neill negotiating the surrender, which was supposed to be an over the head joining of hands of the two rivals. A lot of Democrats felt as Teddy did back then. Not all became “Reagan Democrats,” but standing against Carter, even as Teddy couldn’t make it all the way (stopped in part by history’s ghost of Chappaquiddick), I’m reminded that I never regretted that one vote in ’80. I doubt if Teddy regretted taking on Pres. Carter at the convention either, even though Carter beat him handily. That fight helped inspire him to become the Lion of the Senate.

And just maybe, Sen. Kennedy’s passing and the reminder of all this Liberal Lion of the Senate achieved will make the word liberal something more people will embrace. A word the right learned they had to demonize in order not to be engulfed by its power, and which the passing of Teddy should remind us all is an important word, especially when it comes to enacting policies that actually change peoples lives for the better.

Enjoy the podcast!

…and for posterity, the front page of today’s Washington Post:

teddy_fp_front
Read full story · Comments are closed

8.27.09 – Teddy, the Kennedy Legacy… and right-wing hate.


Photobucket
 

Read full story · Comments are closed

TM-DC Podcast, Democratic Chaos Edition

–updated–

[..] But the notion that our president not only does not have any use anymore for a public option, but in fact “will be satisfied” if there is merely “choice and competition” in the market is, well, disgusting.

I’ll say this for George Bush: you’d never have caught him frantically negotiating against himself to take the meat out of a signature legislative initiative just because his approval ratings had a bad summer. Can you imagine Bush and Karl Rove allowing themselves to be paraded through Washington on a leash by some dimwit Republican Senator of a state with six people in it the way the Obama White House this summer is allowing Max Baucus (favorite son of the mighty state of Montana) to frog-march them to a one-term presidency? … (From Matt Tiabbi)

TM-DC podcast is up, with lots of great audio clips and the tough analysis that’s needed right now. Of course, that includes Sarah Palin’s role in it all too, something I know that infuriates the Palin haters out there. What I do is political analysis, not simply partisan propaganda.

Just maybe if we tell it like it is out here and how we’re feeling someone in the Administration will pay attention and actually do something about it. That’s right, I’m not in the least bit cynical; always hoping for change. Pun intended.

Oh, and according to Mike Allen, the White House yells “uncle!” on e-tip fiasco. Point to the right (another one).

Matt Taibbi slams Pres. Obama joining in the swirling mass of criticism coming out since this weekend, inspired by dueling statements from Obama and his Administration, that could eventually become a political hurricane. It’s the season, after all.

Hot topics in the podcast included: a short audio clip from Obama’s VFW speech (update from text):

… As I said when I announced this strategy, there will be more difficult days ahead. The insurgency in Afghanistan didn’t just happen overnight and we won’t defeat it overnight. This will not be quick, nor easy. But we must never forget: This is not a war of choice. This is a war of necessity. Those who attacked America on 9/11 are plotting to do so again. If left unchecked, the Taliban insurgency will mean an even larger safe haven from which al Qaeda would plot to kill more Americans. So this is not only a war worth fighting. This is a — this is fundamental to the defense of our people.

And going forward, we will constantly adapt to new tactics to stay ahead of the enemy and give our troops the tools and equipment they need to succeed. And at every step of the way, we will assess our efforts to defeat al Qaeda and its extremist allies, and to help the Afghan and Pakistani people build the future that they seek. …

…Tom Delay dancing; Rahm Emanuel and Israelis; but most importantly in other news, Obama doing what his Administration should have done all along on DOMA: ask for a dismissal. What they filed in June was unconscionable. Politico has the full brief.

Enjoy the podcast, available through ITunes and RSS feed.

Read full story · Comments are closed

8.17.09 – Hot Topics (Dancing Delay); Healthcare, Sarah Palin, Wingnuts, Obama, Dean


Photobucket
 

Read full story · Comments are closed

TM-DC Podcast, North Korea Rescue Edition

Photobucket

This week’s podcast is up, also available through RSS and ITunes (and also the direct link).

Great audio clips this week, helping to tell a wonderful tale of rescue and happy endings. Including Chris Matthews, who actually gave Bill Clinton his due (thus the flying pig). Went through the hot news, starting with Sotomayor, then Edwards’ ex-mistress seen in court, Eric Cantor being un-American in Israel, as well as closing with a wild clip of Lou Dobbs imploding over Olbermann, and of course, this story, which proves new media is making traditional media errors. The podcast is lots of fun.

Speaking of North Korea, journalists and the Clintons, back at work today, Bill Clinton didn’t ducked the questions, while doing his day job, announcing the foundation’s new agreements for low-cost AIDS and tuberculosis drugs for the developing world, reported by the Washington Post.

Clinton, appearing at a news conference about his foundation’s efforts to combat AIDS, deflected questions about his impressions of Kim and about whether he had made concessions to the North Koreans to free the journalists.

“My job was to do one thing, which I was honored to do, as an American and as a father,” he said. “I wanted those young women to be able to come home.”

“Anything I say beyond that could inadvertently affect the decisions and moves either here or in North Korea, and the attitudes of our allies,” Clinton continued.

… Clinton described a “deeply emotional” first encounter with Lee and Ling. He said they were “delightful” on the trip home to Los Angeles by private plane, so happy and excited they couldn’t sleep. Lee talked frequently about being reunited with her young daughter, he said.

Enjoy the podcast.

Read full story · Comments are closed

8.6.09 – News Today; Bill Clinton NKorea Rescue of Reporters Ling, Lee, and more…


Photobucket 

Read full story · Comments are closed

TM-DC Podcast: Health Care, Dean on Dems (and more)

The latest podcast is up. You can get it through RSS, as well as ITunes. Enjoy.

The topics are Gates – Crowley – Obama, health care, as well as Sarah Palin. Couldn’t forget her after she officially quit on Sunday.

As for some background for the podcast, it’s Howard Dean who nails it.

You know, this is going to be a hell of an issue in 2010 cause honestly, what’s the point of having a 60 vote majority in the United States Senate, if you can’t produce…health care reform. You can get health insurance reform. This bill is going to cost us a lot of money and it isn’t going to do anything, if this so-called compromise is true. This compromise does nothing, except it will reform insurance. That’s a good thing to do, but they ought to strip the money out of it cause we reformed insurance like this in Vermont 15 years ago. It’s a fine thing to do, but it doesn’t insure more people.

I’d remind everyone that in last week’s press conference Obama led off with “health insurance reform” as the goal, which few caught at the time. But it sure got my attention straight off.

Good evening. Before I take your questions, I want to talk for a few minutes about the progress we’re making on health insurance reform and where it fits into our broader economic strategy. – Pres. Obama

Now take a look at this picture.

Where are the health care heroes? See Ezra:

This is not the Finance Committee’s bill. This is the Max Baucus Committee’s Bill. And there’s not a liberal — or even a Democrat traditionally associated with health-care policy — working on it.

Now read this article, if you haven’t already.

Health care and more in the podcast.

Read full story · Comments are closed

7.28.09 – ‘Stupidly’ Leads to Beer; Health Care Insanity; Sarah Palin Quits


Photobucket 

Read full story · Comments are closed