TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Tag Archives | right-wing radio

Hu-Rah

A computerized medical system the streamlines veteran medical records, which will aid vets in getting treated more quickly and efficiently. That’s just the beginning, though it will take great effort to manifest. President Obama announced it yesterday. It’s long overdue.

[...] The announcements are part of a larger effort to improve services for veterans. Mr. Obama’s budget for 2010 increases spending for veterans by $25 billion and funnels more money into programs for those who suffer mental health problems and traumatic brain injury.

Veterans’ advocacy groups called Thursday’s announcement an important step in smoothing the tangle of bureaucracy that frequently overburdens the veterans’ health care system. …

Secretary Shinseki and Robert Gates were there with Obama, as was Tammy Duckworth, after Republican Sen. Richard Burr of North Carolina crawled down from his high horse to finally stop stonewalling her appointment as assistant secretary at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Paul Rieckhoff, executive director for Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, said it right on Rachel’s show last night when he said Burr is going to pay a price for blocking Duckworth. I hope so.

It’s the same type of behavior we see from other Republicans, like Sen. Inhofe, who on foreign soil, standing at a base in Afghanistan, called the President out for “gutting our military.” Such unpatriotic, un-American drivel from a man who has the nerve to call out the commander in chief on foreign soil, but at a U.S. military base no less.

Rush Limbaugh did the same thing recently on the radio. When a veteran, who announced himself as such, railed at Rush for being pro torture. The call begins civilly, but it didn’t take long for Rush to unleash his putrid vile at this veteran, treating him disrespectfully, before coming completely unglued. Via Media Matters:

CALLER: I served in the Marine Corps and the Army.

LIMBAUGH: Charles, Barack Obama is president of the United States today because of stupid, ignorant people who think like you do. You pose — you and your ignorance are the most expensive commodity this country has. You think you know everything. You don’t know diddly-squat.

As is the case with many Republicans who find themselves faced with soldiers with whom they disagree, or when they find themselves at a loss in an argument they cannot win, Rush attacked this soldier with such vehemence that the “support the troops” mantra he poses was revealed as being something reserved only for those vets who fall in line. Remember what the GOP did to Max Cleland, then John Kerry.

It’s not a small thing that after an Administration that talked a lot about veterans and “supporting the troops,” but instead served nothing but stop-loss and unending tours, leaving our armed forces stretched and worn, that Bush-Cheney ignored what continued to build at the V.A. on their watch. At any moment they could have taken action.

But it was President Barack Obama who put forth a new policy instituting Vets e-Records, which will be tough to implement, but gives all veterans hope that they won’t be lost in the system, finally getting the basic tools they have earned from a grateful nation who owes them so much.

comments are closed

Read full story · Comments are closed

Hannity Hate Speech Sure to Grow as Obama Reaches Out to Muslims

Barack Hussein Obama in Turkey today does what no other American president could do by virtue of his background and who he is. But the sheer act alone of reaching out to this Muslim nation is certain to drive the Hannity hate speech crowd to further ends of division and derision.

Even as a new poll shows Americans ready to turn the page from the past, the Hannity haters have driven a wedge between even moderate Muslims and American reality, sewing doubt about a faith using ignorance and fear to get the job done.

Most Americans think President Obama’s pledge to “seek a new way forward” with the Muslim world is an important goal, even as nearly half hold negative views about Islam and a sizable number say that even mainstream adherents to the religion encourage violence against non-Muslims, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.

There is still a broad lack of familiarity with the world’s second-largest religion — 55 percent of those polled said they are without a basic understanding of the teachings and beliefs of Islam, and most said they do not know anyone who is Muslim. While awareness has increased in recent years, underlying views have not improved.

About half, 48 percent, said they have an unfavorable view of Islam, the highest in polls since late 2001. Nearly three in 10, or 29 percent, said they see mainstream Islam as advocating violence against non-Muslims; although more, 58 percent, said it is a peaceful religion.

Muslims make up about 1 percent of all U.S. adults. [...]

President Obama’s full remarks are below, which address torture, but also Turkey’s 1915 stain, going as well into the issue of Middle East peace. Even in the face of our own country not being quite sure about those of Muslim faith around the world, led by the fearmongering Hannity haters, Obama’s words and presidency provide a path. It will take a lot more than this speech to get the bridge done.

Mr. Speaker, Madam Deputy Speaker, distinguished members, I am honored to speak in this chamber, and I am committed to renewing the alliance between our nations and the friendship between our people.

Photobucket

This is my first trip overseas as President of the United States. I have been to the G-20 Summit in London, the NATO Summit in Strasbourg and Kehl, and the European Union Summit in Prague. Some people have asked me if I chose to continue my travels to Ankara and Istanbul to send a message. My answer is simple: Evet. Turkey is a critical ally. Turkey is an important part of Europe. And Turkey and the United States must stand together – and work together – to overcome the challenges of our time.

This morning I had the privilege of visiting the tomb of the great founder of your Republic. I was deeply impressed by this beautiful memorial to a man who did so much to shape the course of history. But it is also clear that the greatest monument to Ataturk’s life is not something that can be cast in stone and marble. His greatest legacy is Turkey’s strong and secular democracy, and that is the work that this assembly carries on today.

This future was not easily assured. At the end of World War I, Turkey could have succumbed to the foreign powers that were trying to claim its territory, or sought to restore an ancient empire. But Turkey chose a different future. You freed yourself from foreign control. And you founded a Republic that commands the respect of the United States and the wider world.

There is a simple truth to this story: Turkey’s democracy is your own achievement. It was not forced upon you by any outside power, nor did it come without struggle and sacrifice. Like any democracy, Turkey draws strength from both the successes of the past, and from the efforts of each generation of Turks that makes new progress for your people.

My country’s democracy has its own story. The general who led America in revolution and governed as our first President was George Washington. Like you, we built a grand monument to honor our founding father – a towering obelisk that stands in the heart of the capital city that bears Washington’s name.

It took decades to build. There were frequent delays. Over time, more and more people contributed to help make this monument the inspiring structure that still stands tall today. Among those who came to our aid were friends from all across the world, who offered their own tributes to Washington and the country he helped to found.

One of those tributes came from Istanbul. Ottoman Sultan Abdulmecid sent a marble plaque that helped to build the Washington Monument. Inscribed in the plaque was a poem that began with a few simple words, and I quote: “So as to strengthen the friendship between the two countries.” Over 150 years have passed since those words were carved into marble. Our nations have changed in many ways. But our friendship is strong, and our alliance endures.

It is a friendship that flourished in the years after World War II, when President Truman committed our nation to the defense of Turkey’s freedom and sovereignty, and Turkey committed itself to the NATO alliance. Turkish troops have served by our side from Korea to Kosovo to Kabul. Together, we withstood the great test of the Cold War. Trade between our nations has steadily advanced. So has cooperation in science and research.

The ties among our people have deepened as well, and more and more Americans of Turkish origin live and work and succeed within our borders. As a basketball fan, I’ve even noticed that Hedo Turkoglu and Mehmet Okur have got some pretty good game.

The United States and Turkey have not always agreed on every issue. That is to be expected – no two nations do. But we have stood together through many challenges over the last sixty years. And because of the strength of our alliance and the endurance of our friendship, both America and Turkey are stronger, and the world is more secure.

Now, our two democracies are confronted by an unprecedented set of challenges. An economic crisis that recognizes no borders. Extremism that leads to the killing of innocent men, women and children. Strains on our energy supply and a changing climate. The proliferation of the world’s deadliest weapons, and the persistence of tragic conflict.

These are the great tests of our young century. And the choices that we make in the coming years will determine whether the future will be shaped by fear or by freedom; by poverty or by prosperity; by strife or by a just, secure and lasting peace.

This much is certain: no one nation can confront these challenges alone, and all nations have a stake in overcoming them. That is why we must listen to one another, and seek common ground. That is why we must build on our mutual interests, and rise above our differences. We are stronger when we act together. That is the message that I have carried with me throughout this trip to Europe. That will be the approach of the United States of America going forward.

Already, America and Turkey are working with the G-20 on an unprecedented response to an unprecedented economic crisis. This past week, we came together to ensure that the world’s largest economies take strong and coordinated action to stimulate growth and restore the flow of credit; to reject the pressure of protectionism, and to extend a hand to developing countries and the people hit hardest by this downturn; and to dramatically reform our regulatory system so that the world never faces a crisis like this again.

As we go forward, the United States and Turkey can pursue many opportunities to serve prosperity for our people, particularly when it comes to energy. To expand markets and create jobs, we can increase trade and investment between our countries. To develop new sources of energy and combat climate change, we should build on our Clean Technology Fund to leverage efficiency and renewable energy investments in Turkey. And to power markets in Turkey and Europe, the United States will continue to support your central role as an East-West corridor for oil and natural gas.

This economic cooperation only reinforces the common security that Europe and the United States share with Turkey as a NATO ally, and the common values that we share as democracies. So in meeting the challenges of the 21st century, we must seek the strength of a Europe that is truly united, peaceful and free.

Let me be clear: the United States strongly supports Turkey’s bid to become a member of the European Union. We speak not as members of the EU, but as close friends of Turkey and Europe. Turkey has been a resolute ally and a responsible partner in transatlantic and European institutions. And Turkey is bound to Europe by more than bridges over the Bosphorous. Centuries of shared history, culture, and commerce bring you together. Europe gains by diversity of ethnicity, tradition and faith – it is not diminished by it. And Turkish membership would broaden and strengthen Europe’s foundation once more.

Turkey has its own responsibilities. You have made important progress toward membership. But I also know that Turkey has pursued difficult political reforms not simply because it’s good for Europe, but because it is right for Turkey.

In the last several years, you have abolished state-security courts and expanded the right to counsel. You have reformed the penal code, and strengthened laws that govern the freedom of the press and assembly. You lifted bans on teaching and broadcasting Kurdish, and the world noted with respect the important signal sent through a new state Kurdish television station.

These achievements have created new laws that must be implemented, and a momentum that should be sustained. For democracies cannot be static – they must move forward. Freedom of religion and expression lead to a strong and vibrant civil society that only strengthens the state, which is why steps like reopening the Halki Seminary will send such an important signal inside Turkey and beyond. An enduring commitment to the rule of law is the only way to achieve the security that comes from justice for all people. Robust minority rights let societies benefit from the full measure of contributions from all citizens.

Photobucket

I say this as the President of a country that not too long ago made it hard for someone who looks like me to vote. But it is precisely that capacity to change that enriches our countries. Every challenge that we face is more easily met if we tend to our own democratic foundation. This work is never over. That is why, in the United States, we recently ordered the prison at Guantanamo Bay closed, and prohibited – without exception or equivocation – any use of torture.

Another issue that confronts all democracies as they move to the future is how we deal with the past. The United States is still working through some of our own darker periods. Facing the Washington monument that I spoke of is a memorial to Abraham Lincoln, the man who freed those who were enslaved even after Washington led our Revolution. And our country still struggles with the legacy of our past treatment of Native Americans.

Human endeavor is by its nature imperfect. History, unresolved, can be a heavy weight. Each country must work through its past. And reckoning with the past can help us seize a better future. I know there are strong views in this chamber about the terrible events of 1915. While there has been a good deal of commentary about my views, this is really about how the Turkish and Armenian people deal with the past. And the best way forward for the Turkish and Armenian people is a process that works through the past in a way that is honest, open and constructive.

We have already seen historic and courageous steps taken by Turkish and Armenian leaders. These contacts hold out the promise of a new day. An open border would return the Turkish and Armenian people to a peaceful and prosperous coexistence that would serve both of your nations. That is why the United States strongly supports the full normalization of relations between Turkey and Armenia.

It speaks to Turkey’s leadership that you are poised to be the only country in the region to have normal and peaceful relations with all the South Caucusus nations. And to advance that peace, you can play a constructive role in helping to resolve the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, which has continued for far too long.

Advancing peace also includes the dispute that persists in the eastern Mediterranean. Here, there is cause for hope. The two Cypriot leaders have an opportunity through their commitment to negotiations under the United Nations Good Offices Mission. The United States is willing to offer all the help sought by the parties as they work toward a just and lasting settlement that reunifies Cyprus into a bizonal and bicommunal federation.

These efforts speak to one part of the critical region that surrounds Turkey. And when we consider the challenges before us, on issue after issue, we share common goals.

In the Middle East, we share the goal of a lasting peace between Israel and its neighbors. Let me be clear: the United States strongly supports the goal of two states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security. That is a goal shared by Palestinians, Israelis, and people of good will around the world. That is a goal that that the parties agreed to in the Roadmap and at Annapolis. And that is a goal that I will actively pursue as President.

We know that the road ahead will be difficult. Both Israelis and Palestinians must take the steps that are necessary to build confidence. Both must live up to the commitments they have made. Both must overcome longstanding passions and the politics of the moment to make progress toward a secure and lasting peace.

The United States and Turkey can help the Palestinians and Israelis make this journey. Like the United States, Turkey has been a friend and partner in Israel’s quest for security. And like the United States, you seek a future of opportunity and statehood for the Palestinians. Now, we must not give into pessimism and mistrust. We must pursue every opportunity for progress, as you have done by supporting negotiations between Syria and Israel. We must extend a hand to those Palestinians who are in need, while helping them strengthen institutions. And we must reject the use of terror, and recognize that Israel’s security concerns are legitimate.

The peace of the region will also be advanced if Iran forgoes any nuclear weapons ambitions. As I made clear yesterday in Prague, no one is served by the spread of nuclear weapons. This part of the world has known enough violence. It has known enough hatred. It does not need a race for ever-more powerful tools of destruction.

I have made it clear to the people and leaders of the Islamic Republic that the United States seeks engagement based upon mutual interests and mutual respect. We want Iran to play its rightful role in the community of nations, with the economic and political integration that brings prosperity and security. Now, Iran’s leaders must choose whether they will try to build a weapon or build a better future for their people.

Both Turkey and the United States support a secure and united Iraq that does not serve as a safe-haven for terrorists. I know there were differences about whether to go to war. There were differences within my own country as well. But now we must come together as we end this war responsibly, because the future of Iraq is inseparable from the future of the broader region. The United States will remove our combat brigades by the end of next August, while working with the Iraqi government as they take responsibility for security. And we will work with Iraq, Turkey, and all of Iraq’s neighbors, to forge a new dialogue that reconciles differences and advances our common security.

Make no mistake, though: Iraq, Turkey, and the United States face a common threat from terrorism. That includes the al Qaeda terrorists who have sought to drive Iraqis apart and to destroy their country. And that includes the PKK. There is no excuse for terror against any nation. As President, and as a NATO ally, I pledge that you will have our support against the terrorist activities of the PKK. These efforts will be strengthened by the continued work to build ties of cooperation between Turkey, the Iraqi government, and Iraq’s Kurdish leaders, and by your continued efforts to promote education and opportunity for Turkey’s Kurds.

Finally, we share the common goal of denying al Qaeda a safe-haven in Pakistan or Afghanistan. The world has come too far to let this region backslide, and to let al Qaeda terrorists plot further attacks. That is why we are committed to a more focused effort to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al Qaeda. That is why we are increasing our efforts to train Afghans to sustain their own security, and to reconcile former adversaries. And that is why we are increasing our support for the people of Afghanistan and Pakistan, so that we stand on the side of their security, their opportunity, and the promise of a better life.

Turkey has been a true partner. Your troops were among the first in the International Security Assistance Force. You have sacrificed much in this endeavor. Now, we must achieve our goals together. I appreciate that you have offered to help us train and support Afghan Security Forces, and expand opportunity across the region. Together, we can rise to meet this challenge like we have so many before.

I know there have been difficulties these last few years. I know that the trust that binds us has been strained, and I know that strain is shared in many places where the Muslim faith is practiced. Let me say this as clearly as I can: the United States is not at war with Islam. In fact, our partnership with the Muslim world is critical in rolling back a fringe ideology that people of all faiths reject.

But I also want to be clear that America’s relationship with the Muslim work cannot and will not be based on opposition to al Qaeda. Far from it. We seek broad engagement based upon mutual interests and mutual respect. We will listen carefully, bridge misunderstanding, and seek common ground. We will be respectful, even when we do not agree. And we will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over so many centuries to shape the world for the better – including my own country. The United States has been enriched by Muslim Americans. Many other Americans have Muslims in their family, or have lived in a Muslim-majority country – I know, because I am one of them.

Above all, we will demonstrate through actions our commitment to a better future. We want to help more children get the education that they need to succeed. We want to promote health care in places where people are vulnerable. We want to expand the trade and investment that can bring prosperity for all people. In the months ahead, I will present specific programs to advance these goals. Our focus will be on what we can do, in partnership with people across the Muslim world, to advance our common hopes, and our common dreams. And when people look back on this time, let it be said of America that we extended the hand of friendship.

There is an old Turkish proverb: “You cannot put out fire with flames.”

America knows this. Turkey knows this. There are some who must be met with force. But force alone cannot solve our problems, and it is no alternative to extremism. The future must belong to those who create, not those who destroy. That is the future we must work for, and we must work for it together.

I know there are those who like to debate Turkey’s future. They see your country at the crossroads of continents, and touched by the currents of history. They know that this has been a place where civilizations meet, and different peoples mingle. And they wonder whether you will be pulled in one direction or another.

Here is what they don’t understand: Turkey’s greatness lies in your ability to be at the center of things. This is not where East and West divide – it is where they come together. In the beauty of your culture. In the richness of your history. In the strength of your democracy. In your hopes for tomorrow.

I am honored to stand here with you – to look forward to the future that we must reach for together – and to reaffirm America’s commitment to our strong and enduring friendship. Thank you.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Shooter Murders Policemen

Photobucket

Distraught over losing his job, 23 year-old man Richard Poplawski told a friend he was “going to die today,” then after police were called to his home checking out some sort of “domestic disturbance,” which still hasn’t been fully explained, he opened fire murdering two cops, then, proceeded to have a gunbattle that had SWAT and other Pittsburgh teams on the scene firing over 100 rounds.

A gunman wearing a bulletproof vest and “lying in wait” opened fire on officers responding to a domestic disturbance call Saturday, killing three of them and turning a quiet Pittsburgh street into a battlefield, police said.

[...] Poplawski had feared “the Obama gun ban that’s on the way” and “didn’t like our rights being infringed upon,” said Edward Perkovic, his best friend.

Perkovic, 22, said he got a call at work from him in which he said, “Eddie, I am going to die today. … Tell your family I love them and I love you.” [...]

This follows a similar pattern in other homicides when the shooter involved often telegraphs violence to come, whether to himself or others.

But the report that, according to his friend, Poplawski was afraid of some fictional Obama gun ban was on its way, reveals a loose grasp on reality by the shooter. The only thing to which Obama is committed with regards to guns is enforcing the laws, which is as it should be.

However, one element in today’s world that also plays a part, particularly since the shooter mentioned an Obama gun ban that is a fear threat of the right used by people like the N.R.A., is that people like Poplawski are the perfect target for the right-wing fearmongering hate speech circling the media airwaves since conservatives lost their hold on everything.

But no one is responsible for the cold blooded murders of the three policeman but Richard Poplawski.

That the shooter warned something was coming, however, even supposedly saying he was “going to die tonight,” is a not a minor part of this story. Everyone needs to take words of this nature seriously when they hear them. In these troubled, fragile times, when the bottom has fallen out of lives, we can’t afford to shrug these dire statements off.

Prayers go out to the families of the slain Pittsburgh officers and the larger police family there, all of whom are grieving.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Budget Reviews: Obama Wins

Photobucket

I know I’ve said it before, but what a week for the American President.

… as well as Democrats, because as you’ll see below, there was nary a Republican to be found.

We’re also learning about Obama’s crisp reminder to bank executives, which came via anonymous sources, but provides a delicious quote of the day. Obama to bank execs:

“My administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks.” – President Obama (via Politico)

Classic.

The Wall Street Journal takes aim at Al Gore on “cap and collapse,” as they see it. I know, you’re shocked.

Washington Post says not so fast, but no one should expect cap and trade to come easily. No doubt Al Gore knows this all too well.

Love or hate the budget, it was a winner for Obama and his administration. But they sure do own it now. What do you think?

New York Times: A lesson that bipartisanship can’t happen with Republicans. Budget “Viewed As A Victory For The New White House, Particularly Because Most Moderate And Conservative Democrats Went Along.”

Wall Street Journal: “President’s Priorities on Health Care, Energy and Education Are Intact.” … “A Significant Victory.”

Christian Science Monitor: “Obama gets budget passed. Fast? Yes. Bipartisan? Nope”

New York Daily News: A “Political Victory” For The President.

Bloomberg: “Got A Pair Of Wins On Capitol Hill As The House And Senate Approved Drafts Of His 2010 Budget Plan That Largely Adhere To The Administrations Priorities.”

New York Times: The House Budget Voted “…actually reflected a strong show of Democratic support for the budget, since it often barely passes. It was the first time in a dozen years that a budget had received more than 230 votes.”

Politico: “House vote surpassed the size of budget victories for either party over the last decade.”

New York Times: “House Democrats easily defeated Republican alternatives and won backing for their budget from all segments of their party, from conservative Blue Dogs to urban liberals.”

Democrats are definitely flexing their muscles. The New York governor even succeeded in kicking Rush out of New York. It’s an excuse to sit on his posterior in Florida, sulking, no doubt, after Ed Schultz got the MSNBC gig.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Hail To The Chief

Photobucket

In one visit, President Obama turned the page from the Bush-Cheney era of cowboy leadership to one that acknowledges that in the 21st century we cannot go it alone.

Merkel of Germany and Sarcozy of France went from promising disgruntlement to giving credit where it’s earned:

Both credited the new U.S. president with helping to break a banking-secrecy logjam over tax havens and the release of a blacklist of non-compliant jurisdictions.

… “President Obama really found the consensus,” Sarkozy told reporters after the meeting. “He didn’t focus exclusively on stimulus … In fact it was he who managed to help me persuade [Chinese] President Hu Jintao to agree to the reference to the … publication of a list of tax havens, and I wish to thank him for that.”

In her news conference, Merkel noted that “the American president also put his hand into this.”

Pres. Sarkozy announced he will also take one detainee from Gitmo.

As for Russia’s Pres. Medvedev, what a difference a real leader makes:

The Russian president contrasted Obama as “totally different” to his predecessor George W. Bush, whom he blamed for the “mistake” of US missile shield plans fiercely opposed by Moscow.

[...] “I liked the talks. It is easy to talk to him. He can listen. The start of this relationship is good,” he said, adding: “Today it’s a totally different situation (compared to Bush)… This suits me quite well.”

It’s a turn in a new direction, though manifesting something concrete, especially on loose nukes, remains to be worked out, as does the missile defense issue, which waits a solution.

Obama went further today, reaching out in an historic townhall that was obviously meant to encourage the people of France and also Germany that their countries need to get further involved in Afghanistan. This as Pres. Obama heads to NATO to press his case for more regional involvement in Afghanistan, while also stressing that Al Qaeda and terrorism remains a world threat.

“France recognises that having al-Qaeda operate safe havens that can be used to launch attacks is a threat not just to the United States but to Europe.

“In fact it is probably more likely that al-Qaeda would be able to launch a serious terrorist attack in Europe than in the United States because of proximity.

“This is not an American mission, this is a Nato mission, this is an international mission.”[..]

It’s enough to make Glenn Beck cry.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Trucker TV

Photobucket

…and I mean that in a positive sense. If you saw my husband’s truck you’d get it (most of you have heard me talk about it).

After Phil Griffin did his best to throw a curve ball, stating MSNBC might do reruns, “The Ed Show” is in. This is the gig Schultz has wanted for a long time.

Good for him… and us. Another lib on the TV machine, as Ms. Maddow calls it.

Rush Limbaugh couldn’t cut it in this most personal of mediums. Ed’s new gig is likely to drive Rush mad, maybe even inspire him to Jenny Craig.

One of the things Mr. Schultz said tonight on “Countdown” was that labor has gotten the shaft and he wants to talk about it. Now that’s must see TV.

Shuster will co-host, which is a better fit, with Tamron Hall. Norah O’Donnell moves to the morning.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Congressional Looney Tune Time

You know what’s really amazing about this video? It’s featured on Rep. Bachman’s YouTube page. Evidently, she didn’t quite get how ridiculous she sounded, though if she’d just taken in the incredulous looks of both Geithner and Bernanke she would have gotten the message. However, Sean Hannity had her up front and center on his radio show today. The wingnuts love her.

Consider this a mid-week free for all. Anything on your mind? If so, let’s hear it.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Tammy Bruce Calls First Lady ‘Trash’

Photobucket

It’s hard to believe that the insulting invectives could go any lower than they did during the Clinton administration. Yes, Kenneth Starr dragged first lady Hillary Clinton into testify, putting her through hell even though it was all just for his grandiose political hunting. But at least Starr had the creativity to concoct a case that ended up in one of the great pornographic fiction compilations in U.S. political history. Not so with the cretins on right-wing talk radio.

But I certainly wasn’t surprised that the latest loaded bile to spew forth from the radio dial came from a guest host on the Laura Ingraham show. That it flew from the self-hating shrillness of Tammy Bruce’s lips was also fitting.

Huffington Post has the tape and the transcript:

“That’s what he’s married to,” Bruce said. “…You know what we’ve got? We’ve got trash in the White House. Trash is a thing that is colorblind, it can cross all eco-socionomic…categories. You can work on Wall Street, or you can work at the Wal-Mart. Trash, are people who use other people to get things, who patronize others, who consider you bitter and clingy…”

Yes, the “trash” talking was despicable. But the point worth noting is actually when Bruce spits “That’s what he’s married to. …”

In the classic attack of a faux feminist, Ms. Bruce does what the traditional coalition always does. She declares that Obama’s choice of wife is less by referring to her as “that,” an object in a relationship lowering her power and her personhood to worse than an appendage to the man, or his property, but to a thing. The first lady of the United States relegated to less than, not only a woman but a full human being in her own right, is a classic reaction put into rant that relegates Ms. Bruce’s entire shrieking monologue to a kin to racism, lowering Mrs. Obama to that, an object, property of… For what if anything is the black female but that, with President Obama married to “that.”

The moment that incensed Ms. Bruce having to do with the way Mrs. Obama talked. Classic stuff, really.

We’ve recently seen Ms. Ingraham attack Meghan McCain through the “plus-sized” label, going at this woman through her weight, something that always hits females at some level, while reducing her simply to a body. Now we’ve got Ms. Bruce going after the First Lady of the United States through her lack of personhood, reducing her to that which the President married.

How many times in American history has a white person relegated a black woman to an object, a thing? When you add in the leader of the Ingraham, Bruce bile set, Rush Limbaugh compiling a song called “Barack the Magic Negro,” it’s not surprising what Ms. Bruce said, but the continuation of a pattern. Republicans must be so proud of their leaders.

Naturally, the left-wing media is now trying to convince us that this James Brown-look-alike has all the allure, glamour and fashion sense of Jackie Kennedy. – Burt Prelutsky (Townhall)

Read full story · Comments { 69 }

Meghan McCain Scares Laura Ingraham

Laura Ingraham is a wimp. If she can’t take the heat of right-wing radio, maybe she should leave it to the boys. Because whenever you punch down from your power category you’re either insecure or insufficiently aware of how embarrassing you appear or maybe it’s both. After her infamous tirade castigating journalists for not going into Iraq’s danger zones, while she was standing in the safety of the Green Zone, she’s decided to hit a new low.

Ms. Ingraham went after John McCain’s daughter, Meghan McCain, using weight to get the job done. She might as well challenged Meghan to a pillow fight. Seriously, Laura, if this is the best you can do please call Rush. I don’t care for the wingnut blowhard, but at least he knows how to wage these messy party wars and what target is below his pedestal.

Ooh! Ooh! Hey Meghan, you’re plus-sized! Ooh! Ooh! Done, of course, in Ms. Ingraham’s best valley girl voice.

Via Think Progress (audio at the link):

MCCAIN (on MSNBC): And I think there’s an extreme on both parties and I hate extreme. I don’t understand. I have friends that are the most radically conservative and radically liberal people possibly ever and we all get along. We can find a middle ground.

INGRAHAM (mocking): Ok, I was really hoping that I was going to get that role in the Real World, but then I realized that, well, they don’t like plus-sized models. They only like the women who look a certain way. And on this 50th anniversary of Barbie, I really have something to say.

When you can’t attack an argument someone is making, attack the person. If it’s a woman, go for the scales. Trouble is, Meghan has made peace with the weight issue — as most women have to at some point — leaving Ms. Ingraham talking to herself. From Glamour:

5. She has a great body image

“I got to a point where I was like, I just don’t care. You think I’m fat? Fine. I don’t care how much you weigh.”

This one cuts across party lines, so all I can say is good for you, Meghan. A remark like Ingraham’s has the spray pattern of buck shot.

But these wacky Republicans and their conservative cannibalism. By 2010 you’ve got to wonder if any of them will be left standing.

Read full story · Comments { 18 }

Tell Rush You’re Sorry

While the Rush wave continues, Rasmussen has a poll out describing where Rush stands in it all. The bottom line is that while Rush leads, with no modern leader around anywhere, Republicans today are looking backwards to Ronald Reagan and 1980′s. Someone needs to tell them it’s the modern era. But also that the current financial implosion has at its foundation in Reagan’s deregulation. Who’s going to break the news on that one?

But the question now is who will be the next to step in it and offend the Republicans’ Dear Leader? It can be you. It’s easy. Join in. Even Rush links it up today.

But the person in real trouble right now is Michael Steele. When “Morning Joe” makes you the brunt of their jokes you know you’re headed for the political hall of shame:

Michael Steele was the target of many a joke on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” after he apparently declined to appear on the show.

After asking where the RNC chairman was and what time he was scheduled to appear on the show this morning, host Joe Scarborough quipped, “Did Rush not give him permission?”…

Scarborough hits it. Republicans like Steele, who wasn’t the first but clearly is the tipping point on this one, look like spineless pansies, not capable of standing up to the P.T. Barnum of the Republicans’ main ring circus, afraid of the blowback. Guess what, he got it anyway.

Read full story · Comments { 15 }

More Proof Rush Is The Voice of the Republican Party

So, having cleared snow off my driveway and car, off I went to the forum on Middle East peace (full report on that at another time). Listening to Rush on the way, I wondered if he’d address the Michael Steele slam, which happened on D.L. Hughley’s show. He didn’t disappoint, via Politico:

“You know who needs a little leadership? Michael Steele and those at the RNC,” Limbaugh said, part of an unusual counter-attack against the elected head of the GOP.

“I hope the RNC chairman will realize he’s not a talking head pundit, that he is supposed to be working on the grassroots and rebuilding it and maybe doing something about our open primary system and fixing it so that Democrats don’t nominate our candidates,” Limbaugh said, his voice rising. “It’s time, Mr. Steele, for you to go behind the scenes and start doing the work that you were elected to do instead of trying to be some talking head media star, which you’re having a tough time pulling off.”

After that, I wondered how long it would take Michael Steele to apologize. Also delighting in the very public civil war that is making matters worse for Republicans. I silently bet myself it would be before the end of the day. As if on cue…

By the time I was driving home from the forum, Steele had paid homage to El Rushbo.

On a certain commentators wingnut show, to use Mark Levine’s own words, the “breaking news” from him was that Michael Steele “had been in touch” with Limbaugh. The gist of it was that Steele evidently went over his words and decided he didn’t really mean what he said; that the words he used weren’t actually what he meant and that no insult was intended. Evidently Mr. Steele realized that without Rush Limbaugh there is no Republican Party and thus he’d be out of a job.

Politico has Michael’s mea culpa.

Read full story · Comments { 36 }

Reaction Rush, with Hannity the Big Loser

–updated below–

edited version cross-posted at Huffington Post

I moved to the D.C. area just in time to cover CPAC. Saturday didn’t disappoint, in that watching the circus go by sort of way. A lot of people had the same impression.

Let’s start off with Rahm Emanuel, who reminded the Sunday audience that Rush is the Republican Party. Just ask the ones in Congress who have to pay respect or lose their power.

But it was Republican Mike Murphy on “Meet the Press” who put the deepest dagger into the dittohead crowd. Suffice it to say Mr. Murphy shouldn’t be looking for his CPAC invite any time soon:

MR. MURPHY: All these guys. It’s the nature of it. And they’re going to, they’re going to go out and–and it’s all right, it’s a constructive discussion. But in the–at the end of the day here’s the one statistic we all got to remember: the country’s changing. Ronald Reagan won in 1980 with 51 percent of the vote. We all worship Ronald Reagan. But if that election had been held with the current demographics of America today, Ronald Reagan would’ve gotten 47 percent of the vote. The math is changing. Anglo vote’s 74 percent now, not 89. And if we don’t modernize conservatism, we’re going to have a party of 25 percent of the vote going to Limbaugh rallies, enjoying every, every applause line, ripping the furniture up. We’re going to be in permanent minority status.

From the looks of CPAC yesterday, conservatives seem happy to head in that direction.

I got to CPAC in time for Ann Coulter (full video here) who delivered a performance of one liners with little in between. That’s not my review, but what I heard around me: “No substance, but she’s comical.” But she delivers it effortlessly. Talking about the names Lincoln was called back in his day, Ann brought it up to date: “If only Al Sharpton was around (Lincoln) would have known he was a victim of racism.” When talking about President Johnson, Coulter stopped in mid-sentence, remembering the youth of the crowd, telling the “whippersnappers” they’d have to look him up, but it was a doozy. Stating that most in the crowd don’t even remember Bill Clinton. Then it was back to Obama: They keep comparing him to Reagan. Evidently they don’t have a Democratic president to compare.

Coulter was followed by David Horowitz and company ranting about Hollywood, including Robert Davi, who was introduced as an actor whose career was in jeopardy because he’s a right-wing conservative. No one told the CPAC crowd that Davi’s career ended a long time ago. But who knows, maybe he can do for himself what turning full wingnut did for Dennis Miller.

The hilarity began early, especially when David Bosse paid insulting tribute to Michael Moore, then credited Moore with giving him a career. That’s when the “recovering European” duo of Ann McElhinny and Phelim McAleer went into a diatribe against Al Gore trying to hawk the film they’d completed, which amounted to showing clips of pure fiction where global warming is concerned. I thought their segment would never end, especially once they started using English school children to sell their celluloid.

But it was when Niger Innes took the stage that the big ring circus lights came on. Not only was he prepared with lots of juicy Dem hating red meat, but he paved the way for the main attraction, Rush Limbaugh.

If anyone was wondering who is the Republican beacon of the Republicans, watching the CPAC crowd react put all doubts to rest.

For the first ten minutes Rush was on fire. He posted the script, but it hardly gives the atmospherics, which tilted towards the bizarre almost immediately. Whatever polish Ann Coulter provided, Rush delivered none of it. Maybe she can give him some pointers if he does this again, which he seemed to hint at at one point in the speech. But it sure helps when the crowd adores you so that whatever faults you have are ignored.

Like almost immediately something manifested that looked horribly wrong. Rush was sweating profusely and fidgeting like he was about to come out of his skin. The room was very cold, with people around me shivering, putting on their coats, while Rush proclaimed how hot it was. It’s doubtful the lights on Rush made the difference. It had to be nerves. Well, why not? He sits in his EIB studio bubble every day. Now he’s in front of everyone, including being televised on cable, as he mentioned continually until not even his audience was laughing at the joke anymore. He was actually face to face with real, live people. But whatever he delivered it wasn’t a speech. More like a steam of conscious babble, just like he does on radio, though there were no commercials to mercifully break the blather. Honestly, I expected much more.

But one moment was utterly stunning. It was when Rush and the entire CPAC audience took the time and effort to malign John Kerry’s service to this country, even laughing at the mention of Vietnam. Rush’s disrespect for the military dripped off the very mention of Kerry’s name. It was disgraceful. For a crew who professes to respect the military, at every turn Republicans reveal their disdain for our troops, especially if they’re Democrats. It’s the same with Republican military policy, which has strung our forces out and depleted our reserves.

But I’m really at a loss of what to make of Rush’s performance on the whole. It was a rambling, sometimes incoherent, self-indulgent mess. There was something pathetically insecure about the lack of structure to the speech, but also Rush’s herky jerky, sweat wiping, water drinking, fist bumping, awkward pauses, note looking, never ending regurgitation of what Rush thought everyone had to hear. Because he was addressing the nation, you know, which he repeated so many times he even got sick of it.

Still, make no mistake about it. Being on the outs fires people up and the CPAC crowd, most of them college students, were definitely fired up.

But who’s going to lead them? Rush, who won the media straw poll? Mitt Romney, who won the candidate poll?

The only loser was Sean Hannity. Glenn Beck beat him out for media favorite, placing just behind Rush, with Sean coming in third. Losing to Glenn Beck? Ouch. O’Reilly was only one point behind Sean. The Fox water cooler chatter is sure to be buzzing tomorrow.

UPDATE: The Constitution Accountability Center has a terrific post up today that’s a must read. It’s particularly fitting since Rush was awarded the “defender of the Constitution award” by CPAC.

Read full story · Comments { 20 }

CPAC Saturday

Well, it’s been a long day. If you follow me on Twitter you know all about it.

Made longer by listening to Rush Limbaugh ramble on for over an hour without a cogent through line, with my friends over at Media Matters capturing a special moment. There’s nothing worse than an egotistical speaker rambling on and on because of self-indulgence thinking the audience is so enamored that it doesn’t matter if it doesn’t have a foundation, a thrust, or a single cogent message. It was hard to judge who was more frenzied, Rush or his audience.

Say what you will about Ann Coulter, whose way of expressing herself is usually as vile as it comes, but she’s far more in command of herself and her subject matter in front of an audience, even if she’s all entertainment and little substance. She could give Rush some pointers.

I’ll have a post up later on it, but right now I need to decompress. Thankful my trip home was quicker than the one there, that’s for sure. Still getting the hang of the area.

Read full story · Comments { 14 }

GOP: The Party of Rush

It’s true and it has been for many years.

Republicans won’t do anything not sanctioned by Rush Limbaugh. When they offend him they apologize on bended knee.

But just look where it’s gotten them.

They’ve lost the House.

They’ve lost the Senate.

President Obama was put into office with historic numbers. Democrats won Virginia, Indiana, the list goes on and on.

So it’s not a bit surprising to me that Democrats are planning to drive this point home again and again. Via Greg Sargent:

… “I’m encouraging every Democrat, every progressive, to be pointing out this powerful but painful truth: The party of Lincoln is now the Party of Limbaugh,” Begala continued. “We should make every Republican answer this: Why do they want our president to fail?”

Begala’s partner on CNN, James Carville, who first articulated the Rush message in early February, is also pushing Dems to blare this message, he confirms. “He is the embodiment of the Republican party, circa 2009,” Carville said. …

Right-wing radio was successful in taking down Bill Clinton a notch, to include impeachment for consensual sex, and they put and kept Dubya in office. But we may finally, at long last have reached the tipping point. If Democrats play this right we could marginalize Rush, because it’s clear the Republicans just don’t get it. Or maybe they don’t have the courage to admit it and take Rush on. Okay by me.

But just maybe Romney gets it. From CPAC:

“In the last eight years, we saw how a president’s political adversaries could be consumed by anger, and even hatred. That is not the spirit that brings us together. We want our country to succeed, no matter who’s in power. [...]

Read full story · Comments { 18 }

Republicans At War Within

Photobucket

Rush discovered, to his shock evidently, that he’s got a listener gender gap. The man who coined “feminazi” and “info-babe” didn’t have a clue. His rationalization was that if he came out and changed his pro life stance all would be fixed. To help he had a “women’s summit.” I listened to it. Think Progress has a partial transcript and audio:

But I want some of these women to start telling me what it is I must do to close the gender gap — or, if not what it is I must do to close the gender gap, what it is I’ve done that has caused the gender gap; assuming the gender gap is true and that the poll is true. […]

I own the men, and what must I do now to own women?

When he wasn’t desperately trying to suck up to women, Rush was squealing that Republicans shouldn’t go after Gov. Jindal, and those who do should never call him again.

Then you have Sean Hannity who became unhinged talking to Rep. Joe Sestak, a retired admiral, yesterday on his show, using the imaginary marsh mouse and high-speed rail from Vegas to Disneyland to do it. Sestak did all he could to keep from laughing in his face (over satellite feed). Today Sean tried to rescue Bobby Jindal with an interview that was one for the books. When not comparing Jindal’s treatment by the media to what Sarah Palin experienced, Hannity was begging and pleading his audience to not throw Jindal overboard.

Gov. Sanford went around the bend, but ended up implying that Rush is an idiot, when asked about Rush’s comments that he wants Obama to fail. Via Real Clear Politics:

I don’t want him to fail. Anybody who wants him to fail is an idiot, because it means we’re all in trouble.

The new RNC chair, Michael Steele, when asked by Neil Cavuto if he’d withhold funds from Senators Specter, Snowe or Collins because of their support for the stimulus, basically said everything is on the table, “baby.”

Jim Bunning is threatening to sue the RNC.

The pressure is just too much these days.

President Obama’s cool has caused the wingnuts to blow their collective gasket. They don’t know where to turn or what to do.

But please, oh, please; oh, please; oh, please. Let the Republicans follow Bill Kristol, who’s got ideas about how Republicans can become relevant again. Evidently, channeling Jindal’s pessimism that government can’t solve any problems at all is catching. Emphasis added:

Perhaps — if they can find reasons to obstruct and delay. They should do their best not to permit Obama to rush his agenda through this year. They can’t allow Obama to make of 2009 what Franklin Roosevelt made of 1933 or Johnson of 1965. Slow down the policy train. Insist on a real and lengthy debate. Conservatives can’t win politically right now. But they can raise doubts, they can point out other issues that we can’t ignore (especially in national security and foreign policy), they can pick other fights — and they can try in any way possible to break Obama’s momentum. Only if this happens will conservatives be able to get a hearing for their (compelling, in my view) arguments against big-government, liberal-nanny-state social engineering — and for their preferred alternatives.

Kristol wants to change the subject from the economy to foreign policy. From the economy to “the war on terror.” From the economy to, well, anything having to do with blowing crap up in other countries, which neocons like Kristol label “foreign policy.”

The Republicans are desperate, but they don’t know what to do. They sure don’t want the subject to stay on domestic, and their business clients want health care, but they can’t afford to give Obama that win, but they don’t dare stop it. They don’t do domestic. Hell, they don’t do foreign policy well either. Because they don’t solve problems. They create them. And they’ve created a big problem for themselves now, which with every effort they’re making worse. That’s what they do.

Read full story · Comments { 20 }

Glenn Beck Says ‘Relax’ While Pushing Panic Button

Fox News channel bringing Glenn Beck on board is just one instance of the diminishing returns on that network. Relying on apocalyptic predictions of doom, Beck enlists Robert Baer who is glad to play along. Using Netanyahu’s ascension in Israel, world wide war on every level threatens us, especially since, as Beck sees it, America is evidently a wounded nation. Baer says that after talking to officers, his unnamed sources predict a 55% chance of a Middle East war. What a revelation! War in the Middle East is 50-50; like that is news?

The insinuation from Beck is obvious: Chaos and doom will be brought to you by President Obama, and Beck’s going to make sure everyone is sufficiently freaked out about it.

As for peace, no one could possibly think Israel’s current chaos is good for those prospects:

Prime Minister-designate Benjamin Netanyahu met with Defense Minister Ehud Barak Monday morning in Jerusalem in efforts to recruit his dovish Labor Party to his future coalition, but to no avail.

Barak rejected Netanyahu’s invitation, saying that “the voters’ verdict has sent the Labor Party into the opposition, and I told Netanyahu that we will serve as a responsible, serious, and constructive opposition.”

[...] On Sunday, Netanyahu and Livni agreed to meet again for talks in the next few days, but stressed that no coalition negotiations are underway.

“I will be taking Kadima into the opposition,” Livni told reporters Sunday night, after their first meeting since the February 10 election. “Netanyahu has asked for another meeting – and I agreed. As far as I am concerned, this meeting has changed nothing.”

Livni said there are still “profound differences” between the two parties’ positions on the peace process and talks with the Palestinians. …

Greenwald has another video to drill the point home.

Neocon Netanyahu, the American financial crisis, and a Democratic president. It’s a trifecta of terror opportunity for people like Beck, hey, but “relax.”

Cable needs another nervous Nelly like Beck like we need Sean Hannity’s cheesy new show complete with high school graphics to match the analysis. Fox is simply filling the void after Bush, making sure fear stays in the political bloodstream. Somebody’s got to do it.

Read full story · Comments { 5 }

Cheap Tricks

Photobucket

Today I’m doing the last of my packing for our cross-country road trip, which begins at dawn tomorrow. Pamela will be back to take care of you.

I don’t know if you saw SNL’s opener last night arguing who’s smarter Sean or Rush but it was hilarious. When it comes to Republicans there is no doubt they are the center of the Republican universe. The reason why is easy: conservative terrestrial radio reaches across this country into every town, county and state. No other medium can compete with giving one single message to the masses. That’s it’s the cheapest way to deliver it and is completely portable helps immensely in tough economic times.

So with all the talk about the Fairness Doctrine, people are really digging in to the subject, which can only benefit us all. After all, whether you are for it or against it, there is nothing to lose from Democrats exposing the conservative ownership on radio stations that program the whole day of non stop right-wing talk. Just imagine listening to station managers explain why their entire radio line up goes from Rush to Sean to Mark Levin or Fred Thompson, including Christian broadcasting, while progressive hosts explain they can’t get their phone calls returned. Not even from producers who tilt left because it’s just too hard to get a new host launched and sustain them monetarily on terrestrial radio. So progressives are stuck on the Internet or on satellite, which doesn’t come close to the financial or audience opportunities.

There are many also arguing the legal side, saying there are ways to break through so the Fairness Doctrine will never fly legally. That Obama isn’t interested makes it even harder, some say. Frankly, President Obama is a smart man, but he likely doesn’t have a clue about what goes on in terrestrial radio, and there’s no reason he should. Most people don’t have the facts on how it’s set up and operated. The myth that liberals can’t monetize is nonsense as well.

Even if you aren’t convinced that the FD is the way to go, which I’m not, a debate on terrestrial radio’s make up on ownership is long overdue.

Knowing the minutia of radio, I’ve written and spoken a lot about it, while also reading a lot of bloviating about the FD, most of it rubbish. So I was thrilled to see a cogent argument on the subject, which is an important read for anyone not quite versed on the subject. David Neiwert:

The core problem is ownership: Radio station ownership in the past twenty years has been decidedly conservative. And anyone who’s worked in media can tell you that ownership sets the tone and direction of what you do. After the Fairness Doctrine was removed, these wealthy right-wing owners effectively proved right one of the fears that drove the creation of the Fairness Doctrine in the first place: That the wealthy can and will dominate the political conversation on the public airwaves by simply buying up all the available space. Since the wealthy in this country are overwhelmingly conservative, the end result was not only predictable, it was in fact predicted.

Liberal radio has withered on the vine not for the lack of demand, but for the lack of ownership dedicated to nurturing talent, promoting the product, and creating local outlets as well as national markets.

Besides, anything that makes Sean Hannity red in the face is good for Democrats.

There are so many reasons why the debate about the FD and radio ownership could benefit Democrats. Reading progressive arguments against the FD is infuriating, because these folks are basically caving to pressure from the wingnuts who don’t want any sunshine on this issue due to the fact that if people knew how stacked the radio deck was in favor of conservatives they’d finally be exposed and someone would have to do something about it.

In these tough economic times, with ad dollars drying up, conservative hosts are the ones raking in most of the money, while spreading one side of the story across this country. No other platform can compete. That’s the way conservatives like it and some Dems seem happy to oblige.

As an aside, since I’ve gotten quite a few emails about it, my show remains on hiatus and I’m not sure where I go from where I’ve been. I haven’t been on the air since 2002, only able to do web radio, which isn’t the primary place where I want to be broadcasting. The passion I have for the medium remains, but I never got into it to do it for free.

Now it’s your turn. Consider this a Sunday free for all, any topic.

Keep good thoughts for us on our long drive back east. I’m just hoping the weather doesn’t get too gnarly. Pamela will take good care of you.

Read full story · Comments { 18 }

Bill Clinton: More Balance Needed on Radio

Oh, this is going to ignite the wingnuts.

Via Mario Solis-Marich, with the audio available at Huffington Post:

“We either ought to have the Fairness Doctrine or more balance on the other side. Because, essentially, there’s always been a lot of big money to support the right-wing talk shows. … [...] and if you only hear one side on the radio, that’s pretty tough. ” – Former President Bill Clinton

Amidst the economic downturn, terrestrial radio remains the strongest weapon Republicans have against the Democrats, including on the stimulus. It’s simply reality.

Whether the Fairness Doctrine is the ultimate answer, I don’t know, but clearly media consolidation is an issue, especially with the imbalance of conservatives v. progressives on the radio.

Which brings me to Sean Hannity’s show, which compared to El Rush is a perfect example of pitiful programming. Hannity has turned his show into a non-stop commercial for himself, Fox, and his advertisers, in between calls where the same thing is said every day. As Bill Clinton says in the audio, even when you disagree with Limbaugh he can sometimes be entertaining, oftentimes inadvertently. Most of conservative talk has lost that vein, with Hannity leading the pack in the yawn factor. Hey, but he has a lib on every once in a while, which is more than you can say for Rush, who is the king of reclusive radio, where he just sits in his studio and talks to himself all day.

Nobody knows what conservative radio can do to a presidency more than William Jefferson Clinton. They led the charge against him in the 1990′s. With Democrats in power the least they should do is look at media ownership.

Read full story · Comments { 54 }

Dick Morris Still Hunting Hillary

Clinton talking about Iran in the video. Clinton on Afghanistan, with someone finally mentioning the Quetta shura in southern Afghanistan, looking beyond FATA as we delve into solving the security issues in the Afpak region.

“We’ve made progress going into the tribal areas and North-West Frontier Province against Al Qaeda, but we have not had a counterpart war against the Quetta shura,” said a senior Obama administration official, using the term for the Taliban’s ruling council. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has said the Obama administration will adopt a tough love approach to Pakistan: threatening to cut off military aid to Islamabad unless it carries out a crackdown on militants operating throughout the country.

“Pakistan will act against any individuals involved with Al Qaeda or the Taliban about whom we have actionable intelligence,” Husain Haqqani, Pakistan’s ambassador to the United States, said in an interview. “The problem is we do not always get actionable intelligence in Quetta in particular. It’s a very messy area.”

Only in this small man’s little mind would Secretary Clinton’s role in the Obama administration be seen as “incredible, shrinking,” and “dissolving under her feet.” The famous toe sucker of D.C. runs down a list of prominent Obama aides somehow coming to the conclusion that because Clinton isn’t in charge of everything she’s less. It’s a feat of rationalizing to make this head Hillary hater feel better about losing his own power base, which now consists of Sean Hannity’s world. After laying out all of Obama’s advisers and their roles, including Biden’s role in Obama’s foreign policy team, Morris makes an astounding assessment:

So where does all this leave Secretary of State Clinton?

While sympathy for Mrs. Clinton is outside the normal fare of these columns, one cannot help but feel that she is surrounded by people who are, at best, strangers and, at worst, enemies. The competition that has historically occupied secretaries of State and national security advisers seems poised to ratchet up to a new level in the current administration.

Therein lies Morris’ real motive. To begin the competition and in-fighting storyline so as to undermine any connection Hillary has with Obama, as well as their relationship, so that the usual suspects can get busy on the gossip angle.

I guess Morris is oblivious to the fact that Holbrooke, Obama’s representative to the Afpak region, which is a bit larger role than simply an “envoy,” was a confirmed Clintonista until Hillary and Barack made full peace, someone who also will report to President Obama through Clinton. This appointment is no small thing, which Clinton explains in this interview.

Morris also forgets that Hillary intends to give State a lot more teeth, taking back what Rummy felt was military work. His ignorance at Clinton’s job mandate comes from his inner little boy who cannot fathom the adult work of diplomacy.

The fact is that Clinton’s knowledge base is beyond the likes of Morris and others of his ilk. She’s in a league of her own talking substance and issues, while the Morrises of the world talk trash.

Read full story · Comments { 31 }

Why Obama Will Win the Spin War Against Republicans

When I think of where Barack Obama started, then I watch this clip, I see the expansion, not only of a politician, but of a man who can now feel the pain and problems of every day Americans. Candidate Obama didn’t start out here, but in the video above he shows the empathy he didn’t during the campaign. He’s come a long way. It’s the same classic reaction that William Jefferson Clinton revealed that made him so beloved when he was president. The humanity of politics and what is at the heart of everything in action. The chance to change people’s lives.

Republicans don’t have a chance to make headway if President Obama continues to go straight to the people and over their heads. This should have been done at the start of the stimulus talk, but Obama believed honest reaching out and across the aisle in a bipartisan gesture would dent the cynicism and desperation of his political adversary to remain relevant. Not a chance, never does. But he got it together and did what had to be done in the end.

Rush can’t touch what Obama does in person, neither can Sean Hannity or any other wingnut squealer. Laura Ingraham can insult Sen. Specter for listening to Obama, saying he was seduced by dinner, which is ludicrous considering his demands on the stimulus going forward. Maybe Ms. L should take a look around Specter’s district to understand the complexities of Pennsylvania in these economic times. When politicians make decisions like Specter’s chances are they’ve taken a look at what’s in their best interests as well.

Obama wins big on this one, everyone does, except Republicans. The bully pulpit used to its best results, compliments of a woman who believed that telling her president of her dire circumstances would manifest results. We’ll see where this story leads.

Read full story · Comments { 24 }