TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Tag Archives | Rush Limbaugh

And Republicans Wonder Why Turnout is Down

This cannot end well for him, particularly doing this claiming to be a Christian. And it might not end well for the rest of us either. Barack Obama has gone to war with Christians’ consciences and he is perverting God’s word in the process to get his way on public policy. – The Perversion of the Words of Our Lord Jesus Christ by the Sinner Barack H. Obama, by Erick Erickson

Erick Erickson reveals one of the fundamental problems with Republicanism today. It’s not conservative at all anymore.

In a rambling, self-importantly arrogant post, Erickson pontificates on what he thinks he knows about being a Christian through a literal analysis of the Bible. Then he stands in judgment over Pres. Obama.

The self-righteous never see irony coming.

There is nothing Christian in Erickson’s harangue against Pres. Obama. There is also nothing conservative about it.

Conservatism has a measure of grounding when you listen to analysis of it from people who don’t wrap their religion through their conservative ideology.

A religious conservative can be against abortion. But an ideological conservative, while being against abortion and not wanting to fund it, cannot simultaneously take a person’s liberty away by forcing pregnancy on a woman when natural law protects her right to personal autonomy.

The very notion of conservatism is rooted in personal liberty. Whether religious conservatives like it or not, to be true to conservatism, they must honor that liberty. Today, they do not.

Any conservative with intellectual or political integrity would understand that conservatism of any depth must be rooted in the fundamental idea that interrupting the freedoms of any person through the intrusion of government, whether federal or state, is abridging a person’s autonomy in a manner that is the anti-thesis of conservatism.

Religious conservatism or fundamentalist-based Republicanism is actually a self-righteous marketing attempt to make people like Erickson and his ilk think they are on higher ground and have the ultimate interpretation of right and wrong. You hear it through Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham and the rest of the self-righteous radio crowd.

It’s the blatant hypocrisy to claim to be a conservative, but think religious dogma should hold more sway than an individual who’s privacy and personal freedoms are innate to being a person in the first place.

Conservatism without religion can make sense.

Add religion, however, and conservatism becomes authoritarian in nature, relegating women to non-persons, second class citizens and slaves, because the state or federal government, through religious dictates, is now in charge.

Conservatism’s very nature is about doing less, leaving the individual alone to prosper and live without interference, which certainly should include women.

However, since Ronald Reagan invited the “Moral Majority,” which was neither moral or a majority then or now as it exists in other forms, conservatism was bastardized into something that now includes a campaign to take over the domain of a woman’s very body through means of the state or federal government.

Erick Erickson sees no problem with this, because he’s a religious conservative, not a conservative.

You can be religious and you can be a conservative, but once you put the two together in an ideological philosophy you lose the moorings of anything that has integral grounding in what conservatism actually means.

Not even Ron Paul passes this test as a Libertarian. He’s said before that he’s against abortion, because it’s violent, which is perfectly acceptable, but that he’d allow the states to decide the law governing abortions. This fails the basic autonomy test and the very notion of liberty that’s in Libertarianism, which he proved in an interview with Piers Morgan.

The biggest impediment to curtailing abortions is the refusal of religious conservatives and fundamentalist Republicans to accept the primary component to being a person, which is the body that houses the soul, assuming it exists, is something over which no other, certainly no politician, clergy or the state, has control.

This is about personal autonomy and living freely without any dependencies, the first component of personhood. It’s not abortion, but includes it, because religious fundamentalists are using political means to wage a war against the very notion of women’s individual freedom.

If people believing in true liberty don’t start taking religious conservatives on, whatever party they are in, over their fundamentalism, women’s autonomy won’t be sacrosanct one day.

This includes taking on people like Pres. Obama when he decides that a safe pharmaceutical like Plan B can be used as a stick to the contraceptive carrot that came afterward, because women’s individual freedoms remain a bargaining chip for politicians and their supporters.

The ultimate example of this was seen through the Susan G. Komen fiasco this past week, when Komen decided to make ideology more important than the health of women, especially poor women, who have been a political football since the Hyde Amendment. Yes, Pres. Obama used poor women as a football too, and he did it through the religious conservative playbook that created Hyde in the first place.

This column has been updated.

Read full story · Comments { 34 }

Election Year January Snapshot: Romney Up in Florida, Advantage Pres. Obama

Gingrich is badly trailing Romney by 11 percentage points, garnering just 31 percent of likely Republican voters heading into Tuesday’s presidential primary, according to a Miami Herald/El Nuevo Herald/Tampa Bay Times poll released late Saturday night. – Poll: Romney holds big lead over Gingrich in Florida, via the Miami Herald

On ABC’s “This Week” with Jake Tapper today, Newt Gingrich trumpeted the endorsements of Herman Cain and Rick Perry, while parroting Rush Limbaugh and basking in the words of Sarah Palin. His harangue against Mitt Romney, who’s clearly gotten in his head, sounded desperate.

Jake Tapper even did Mitt Romney the favor of playing Romney’s Tom Brokaw ad on national TV. It’s the kind of free media you just can’t buy.

To Newt Gingrich and the right wing Republicans behind him, Pres. Obama and his reelection team simply want to say, thank you and keep it coming.

Things haven’t looked this good for the Democrats in a long time.

From the latest NBC/WSJ poll released on Friday, as we end the first month of 2012:

And for the first time in six months, more people approve of the job the president is doing (48 percent) than disapprove (46 percent).

“The psychology about the economic conditions has switched,” Hart said. “The old saying is a rising tide lifts all boats then clearly, this economic optimism has clearly lifted Obama’s ratings.”

As I’ve written for a very long time, including in my new book, Pres. Obama is beatable. However, it won’t be easy and can’t be done without a Republican Party unified behind one candidate.

Right now, there’s enough animosity being stoked by the Tea Party hard right that this may not be possible.

As I’ve written before, I’m not supporting any candidate for president. However, there are worse things than Pres. Obama being reelected and at the top of that list is Newt Gingrich.

Read full story · Comments { 17 }

Newt’s Rube

But this whole thing isn’t really about Newt Gingrich vs. Mitt Romney. It is about the GOP establishment vs. the Tea Party grassroots and independent Americans who are sick of the politics of personal destruction used now by both parties’ operatives with a complicit media egging it on. In fact, the establishment has been just as dismissive of Ron Paul and Rick Santorum. – Sarah Palin on Facebook

Let’s hope Republican primary voters actually listen to Sarah Palin. If she could push herself on to center stage it would be a whole new circus act.

Sarah Palin finding common cause with Newt Gingrich, a man who wouldn’t be giving her the time of day if conservative Republicans who actually served with Mr. Gingrich weren’t shunning him because they actually know what he’s like as a leader.

The Republican establishment is trying to get rid of Newt because they don’t want a Goldwater blowout in November, with their main concern the House, as well as Senate possibilities, because there are a lot of them who believe none of the current crop of candidates can beat Pres. Obama, which is understandable. A sitting president is tough to beat by a great candidate and these guys aren’t great.

If Mrs. Palin was making that point in this self-important Facebook rant, that there isn’t a candidate to beat Obama so Republicans need to open the primary back up, that would actually make sense. However, that’s not what she’s doing.

This is mostly about Sarah Palin finding a way to get into the action. Reading her Facebook post, half of it is a complete regurgitation of Rush Limbaugh’s talking points, with Palin providing spin that includes herself. If she becomes irrelevant she loses her Fox News Channel ticket and then what does she do?

What a script.

Mrs. Palin even adopted Newt Gingrich’s grandiose remembrances of history to make her point, which like Newt, revolves around her, written by her ego.

I am sadly too familiar with these tactics because they were used against the GOP ticket in 2008. The left seeks to single someone out and destroy his or her record and reputation and family using the media as a channel to dump handpicked and half-baked campaign opposition research on the public. The difference in 2008 was that I was largely unknown to the American public, so they had no way of differentiating between the lies and the truth. All of it came at them at once as “facts” about me. But Newt Gingrich is known to us – both the good and the bad.

Narcissus was modest compared to these two.

Sarah and Newt, bookends of Ego’s library.


Read full story · Comments { 46 }

Newt Gingrich Lied – John King Vindicated

**Update below – Rush “rocked”**

Newt Gingrich’s campaign admitted Wednesday night the former House speaker was inaccurate when he claimed his team offered several witnesses to ABC News to refute statements made by Gingrich’s second wife in a controversial interview aired last week. [...] On Wednesday, however, the campaign conceded the candidate was wrong, both in his debate answer and in his interview with CNN on Tuesday.TRENDING: Gingrich campaign admits error

I’ve been waiting for Newt Gingrich to step in it and it’s happened.


It’s reminiscent of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s Bosnia disaster, which came at a critical time, even though David Plouffe’s caucus strategy would easily outplay Mark Penn’s political malpractice and lack of preparation, credit and blame given fully and without flinching in my new book.

Will it be enough to blow Gingrich out in Florida? It should, because it’s representative of everything about him. But who knows, it’s a wacky year and Republican primary voters haven’t cared so far about anything but satisfying their emotions. It also depends if Mitt Romney or his Super PAC jumps on this, but I’d bet they will, because if I were running his strategy, I’d cranked up the ad machine and get one out post haste.

The revelation that Gingrich lied and tried to disgrace a good reporter, John King, with many in the media playing along, should be instructive to people. It didn’t seem to matter that King is a veteran reporter who had never been challenged before, though I wasn’t one of them, standing up for King’s clear decision to ask Gingrich about the hottest story of the day. Anyone looking at trends across the web, even places like Memeorandum, would have seen the proof. I believed he should have challenged Gingrich when he attacked him, and you can argue about starting with the question on Marianne Gingrich, but it’s King’s call and there’s nothing in his history that even hints he’s unethical, biased to one party or another, or isn’t good at his job.

Oh, if only there was a thought bubble above Pres. Reagan's head...

This latest embarrassment comes after a reader pointed me to Elliott Abrams’ piece yesterday and though I hold Mr. Abrams in particular contempt (see Iran-contra, for which Ronald Reagan deserved to be impeached), when it comes to the Reagan era he’s a source with deep knowledge.

“Measured against the scale and momentum of the Soviet empire’s challenge, the Reagan administration has failed, is failing, and without a dramatic change in strategy will continue to fail. . . . President Reagan is clearly failing.” – Newt Gingrich

Newt is getting carpet-bombed by the conservative chattering class and no one deserves it more. Who would know better about unethical gasbags than Tom Delay? From Politico:

“He’s not really a conservative. I mean, he’ll tell you what you want to hear. He has an uncanny ability, sort of like Clinton, to feel your pain and know his audience and speak to his audience and fire them up. But when he was speaker, he was erratic, undisciplined.” – Drudge, conservative media criticize Newt Gingrich

But have you seen BuzzFeed’s contribution on Newt, complete with art?

Ann Coulter, a Romney gal, delivers the best anti-Newt case there is: Reelect Obama Vote Newt! Mitt Romney’s got humongous general election challenges against Pres. Obama, but there is little doubt that Newt as the nominee would result in a Goldwater type landslide and for good reasons.

Newt Gingrich in the White House would be more dangerous than Sarah Palin.

UPDATE: Listening to Rush Limbaugh’s first hour, a regular habit during election season, this one has been stunning. “It’s happening…” Rush began today, talking about Newt being taken out in Florida; with Gingrich slamming Reagan something he said he didn’t know, being very defensive about it. “We can’t keep up with them starting in March,” Rush Limbaugh said before last break, talking about if the GOP nominee is picked early. This came after he said he was “stunned” at the revelations about Newt on Ronald Reagan. “World rocked about now…” then went to commercial break. … “Snerdly’s chin is on the floor,” Rush continues, after playing a clip of Newt Gingrich saying he was a Rockefeller Republican.

Read full story · Comments { 24 }

Romney is the Republican Party’s Own Creation

Many conservative activists, while not especially enthusiastic about Romney or his establishment backers, are appalled by the odd turn of campaign rhetoric in the closing days of New Hampshire, with Newt Gingrich and Jon Huntsman taking aim at Romney’s record running the private equity firm Bain Capital. These people, who include radio commentator Rush Limbaugh, are apoplectic that anti-Romney Republicans are making common cause with anti-business Democrats. – Mitt Romney vs. the dead-enders


Watching Sean Hannity last night when Rick Perry stated that venture capitalism was good, but “vulture capitalism” was something else entirely, was a moment I will never forget.

It was followed up Frank Luntz saying they all will remember this moment, this week nine months from now, because this was when it all went wrong.

There are other possibilities.

Perhaps the over $7 million dollars, Karl Rove’s figures, of ads ready to air in South Carolina, will help one of the other candidates wrestle the nomination from Mitt Romney’s grip. Maybe the notion that no Republican has won both Iowa and New Hampshire then gone on to win the nomination will sustain them as an omen that Romney can’t possibly be the first.

Perhaps the faith leaders meeting before South Carolina will come up with a consensus candidate, with the news it’s not Newt inspiring him to get behind Rick Santorum.

Movement conservatives are flailing. Michelle Malkin had this to say about Romney sitting next to John McCain: “When they’re together, they look like they’re holding each other (and the rest of us) hostage.”

Erick Erickson isn’t quite sure what to do, with Dana Loesch sounding similarly confused.

All Sean Hannity could do was sputter when Rick Perry started channeling Democratic talking points against Romney. It doesn’t help that Perry and even Gingrich’s message on Romney where Bain is concerned is running head on into the House Republicans’ dogma.

However, there is another possibility, however outlandish to posit. Perhaps all this gnashing of conservative principles in the open and ugly hashing out between the candidates and conservative activists will end up inoculating Mitt Romney, because his story will be reeled out and talked to death so that by the time Democrats rev it up to full ugliness in the fall everyone will not only be numb to it, but turned off because they’ve heard it all before.

Looking at Mitt Romney last night and hearing his perfectly canned and immaculately intoned speech, I don’t get the sense he is someone who is going to be defeated, certainly not by the current crowd of lackluster conservative performers.

As much as I disagree with their entire philosophy, there is also something that seems very healthy about what we’re watching. No one is holding back, as the most robotic candidate and perfectly cast person for the role of Republican nominee just keeps on winning and attracting begrudging supporters, which has stopped no one from escalating the rhetoric. In fact, the more Romney looks like the nominee the more shrill conservatives get.

We have never witnessed from Republicans such an open airing of discontent, though the Tea Party rise before 2010 foreshadowed something was coming when the GOP establishment was fully engaged in picking a presidential nominee.

There is an element of dynamic creative destruction going on, the political edition, as right wing conservatives start attacking venture capitalism and trumpeting some middle way with workers in mind, a weirdly born notion of conservative populism, while the fat cats take their comeuppance and are forced to digest that the days of how they rose won’t cut it with conservative activists and it’s time to shift, though no one is sure where this is all leading.

Republicans are going through their own Occupy moment and it’s from within.

Ron Paul is a part of all this too, but at the center of the combustion is Willard Mitt Romney, the man who is the epitome of everything representing Republicanism and the embodiment of what Rush Limbaugh has been telling his listeners for over 20 years they could have and be too if only they vote Republican.

Republicans have created this vulture capitalist monster, Mitt Romney, a part of the sickness deep within our economy, and they either make peace with him in order to win or churn this conflict through to a conclusion that just might bring about a transformative moment. A moment that began percolating when Ron Paul and the Tea Party started to gain traction during the Bush-Cheney administration and ended up turning state houses over to the right in record numbers in 2010.

Now that money as speech has been unleashed against Newt through the Citizens United decision, the possibility of a new Republican 21st century reformer against “crony capitalism” and hidden money has the possibility of rising, though it’s unlikely to be today.

Ron Paul certainly sees that, which is why he likely won’t choose to leave the Republican Party and will bequeath what he’s begun to his son, now in the Senate, because not even he is convinced the revolution he wants to lead can succeed now. Or maybe not?

It’s been a crazy circus, with mediocre candidates and acting out on all levels for Republicans for months, a year before it has begun to wind down and resolve. However, the audiences for the debates have been large, while the country watches politics as a modern soap opera, the most addictive form of entertainment to ever come out of Hollywood.

Meanwhile, on the Democratic side there is lethargy, deep discontent and uncertainty about what the party even stands for anymore. There is none of the open, honest and potentially renovating energy we’re seeing on the Republican side.

I’m not sure crazy and mediocre equals vibrant, so there’s a long way to go for Republicans, but it has been an open process, the polar opposite of what we’ve seen from Democrats who are obviously afraid to challenge what’s been put in place, revealing an undeserved reverence for power that seems quaint.

The status quo, which is seen in Barack Obama as Romney’s bookend, is not going to cut it it for much longer. At least conservatives are attacking their establishment, while Democrats continue to be largely satisfied with the corporate and Wall Street status quo machine. This might hold them together long enough to reelect Barack Obama, which could finally bring about what needs to happen on the left. A come to Jesus moment about the fights that need to be made so that the party that F.D.R. and L.B.J. helped build in the hearts and minds of Americans doesn’t go up in a puff of personality.

Unlike on the Democratic side, where the same old canned political rah-rah will rise up, just like the establishment is doing on the Republican side for Romney, there is something strangely alive and even exciting happening inside the conservative movement. Even with the mixture of amateurs, crackpots and committed “dead-enders,” the transparency of the fight for ideas is laudable, even if you disagree with what they’re saying and proposing for this country, which I do, while on the Democratic side it looks dry and dead and resigned.

The best thing that could happen to conservatism is Romney winning the nomination but losing to Obama.

If Pres. Obama does win reelection, still likely, I’m not sure the Democratic Party will survive as it has been conceived, because no one will be able to say what it actually means to be a Democrat because Barack Obama doesn’t seem to know himself. The best thing for progressivism could be for Obama to lose, the bookend to Romney not prevailing. Then perhaps Democratic activists can say he lost because the establishment lost their way on policy by allowing someone to rise up and lead them who didn’t make the case or the fight for Democratic ideas, preferring conservatism and compromise as the guide, which is why so many people are leaving the Democratic Party.

I guess what I’m ultimately saying is that the winner of the November elections could really end up being the long-term loser on principle, because the activists in whatever party that wins will have to start all over again, mounting a challenge to the establishment of their party in order to represent anything worth following in an era where Americans don’t trust Republicans or Democrats anymore.

A political renaissance is at hand and November won’t bring the end of anything or a final win for either lumbering, aging and stifling political party. They’ve both lost the privilege of having our loyalty and nothing can change that fact right now.

Read full story · Comments { 28 }

Romney ‘Acceptable’ to Republican Conservatives, and Remainders from Iowa

**Book winner update below**

“I think there are at least 3 tickets out of New Hampshire.” – Jon Huntsman on CNN

…and Mr. Huntsman got that ticket by coming in third.

Romney Wins New Hampshire

Ron Paul Second

–original post below–

Mitt Romney is the now the only candidate that a majority of conservative and moderate/liberal Republicans nationwide see as an “acceptable” GOP nominee for president. Conservative Republicans are more likely to say Romney would be an acceptable nominee than either Newt Gingrich or Rick Santorum. – Gallup

In honor of the Gallup poll above, I bring you the Democratic response to Mitt Romney’s possible nomination below.

An assist goes to Newt Gingrich, who is likely to be held accountable for lengthening the assault and drilling down to the organic Romney candidacy challenges in the age of Occupy. Rush Limbaugh has already started on him.

Meanwhile, Newt Gingrich is unleashing an offensive “pro-abortion” Mitt Romney ad in South Carolina, where the gutter is high water territory.

There is also more bad news for Mitt Romney and his job creating bragging rights. Glenn Kessler gives him 3 Pinocchios on his claim of creating 100,000 jobs, calling it “untenable.”

What’s interesting is Newt’s Bain Capital attack seems to also be registering with Republicans who are developing a political patter and marketing strategy to preemptively prepare for a Romney nomination.

This from Bill Kristol:

Post 2008, capitalism needs its strong defenders—but its defenders need also to be its constructive critics. The Tea Party was right. What’s needed is a critique of Big Government above all, but also of Big Business and Big Finance and Big Labor (and Big Education and Big Media and all the rest)—and especially a critique of all those occasions when one or more of these institutions conspire against the common good. What’s needed is a willingness to put Main Street (at least slightly) ahead of Wall Street, and a reform agenda for capitalism that strengthens it, alongside an even more dramatic reform agenda for government that limits it.

Now for the fun stuff. Before the Iowa caucuses I ran a Call Iowa contest. It’s time to announce the winner. The person who came closest to calling Iowa is “newdealdem1.” Looks like your niece is going to get the book.

BUT… BUT… BUT… [update] “newdealdem1″ has decided to pass her win to the next closest person, who is… “guyski”! Congratulations! Her niece will still get the book, but she’s going to buy it for her. Here’s what she wrote to me:

I am truly stunned and so happy! First, I haven’t won anything since I was a kid and won a picnic basket in one of those Italian-American feasts in NY. LOL

Thank you, Taylor.

Now on to the win. I would like to “donate” my win to the next person who came closest to calling Iowa. I so love your book that I want more people to read it. I am going to purchase your book for my niece as I feel so strongly that young women like my niece need to be cognizant of the things you say in it.

So, Taylor, let the next closest person be the lucky recipient of your book. The more people read your book (even if that person is a guy – and this is crucial for men to read as well), the better.

I have the greatest readers around. Thanks so much “newdealdem1.”

Read full story · Comments { 37 }

Politifact’s ‘Lie of the Year’ Goes to Democrats

Oh boy, this is going to make heads explode.

As a renegade liberal who never agrees with anyone, I characterized Paul Ryan’s plan like this:

There’s a reason Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity have been pushing the Heritage Foundation mercilessly on their show for months and it was to pave the way for Paul Ryan and his Heritage Foundation hallucinations.

This partisan ideological shop is the driving engine for Rep. Ryan’s math , who in using the Heritage Center for Data Analysis as his cover conjured up the stamp of right-wing approval for his “Path to Prosperity.”

It’s going to solve all of our debt problems and even make parents able to stand their teenagers.

I also said it would “end Medicare in ten years.” Is that a lie? It’s partisan language, for certain, fueled by emotion, because I believe Ryan’s plan would end Medicare as we know it. If I’m being honest, now writig as a recovering partisan (though not quite cured), that is what I would write today.

The push back has started, which you can see at Memeorandum.

Steve Benen begins:

This is simply indefensible. Claims that are factually true shouldn’t be eligible for a Lie of the Year designation.

It’s unnerving that we have to explain this again, but since PolitiFact appears to be struggling with the relevant details, let’s set the record straight.

Medicare is a single-payer health care system offering guaranteed benefits to seniors. The House Republican budget plan intended to privatize the existing system and replace it with something very different — a voucher scheme. It would still be called “Medicare,” but it wouldn’t be Medicare.

It seems foolish to have to parse the meaning of the word “end,” but if there’s a program, and it’s replaced with a different program, proponents brought an end to the original program. That’s what the verb means.

Paul Krugman joins in:

The new scheme would still be called “Medicare”, but it would bear little resemblance to the current system, which guarantees essential care to all seniors.

How is this not an end to Medicare? And given all the actual, indisputable lies out there, how on earth could saying that it is be the “Lie of the year”?

The answer is, of course, obvious: the people at Politifact are terrified of being considered partisan if they acknowledge the clear fact that there’s a lot more lying on one side of the political divide than on the other. So they’ve bent over backwards to appear “balanced” — and in the process made themselves useless and irrelevant.

What do you think? Did Democrats and progressives deserve Politifacts “lie of the year”?

Read full story · Comments { 8 }

BARNES & NOBLE Chooses THE HILLARY EFFECT in ‘NOOK First’ Featured Authors Campaign

It’s incredibly exciting to announce that The Hillary Effect has been selected as one of two non-fiction e-books in the Barnes and Noble “NOOK First” featured authors campaign, just launched.

Being selected as part of this “NOOK First” Barnes and Noble project was an incredible honor and opportunity. Now you know why we waited until this week to publish.

This is a tremendously exciting moment for the entire team that made this happen, beginning with Thomas Ellison and Hutch Morton of Premier Digital Publishing.

What a stunning send off they’ve given my e-book.

So, Barnes and Noble is the only place you can buy The Hillary Effect until December 15th.

Pop the champagne! …just don’t spill it on your NOOK.

NOTE: Aps for your pc, MAC and iPad are available for free at Barnes and Noble.

Read full story · Comments { 38 }

Two Out of Three Top GOP Presidential Candidates are Womanizers

The American people will not elect an alleged serial sexual harasser, Herman Cain, or a man, Newt Gingrich, who asked one of his serial wives for a divorce in the hospital as she was recovering from cancer. They simply will not.

But at least we all have even more perspective on why most Republicans remain against the Lily Ledbetter Act. They simply don’t feel women deserve equanimity of respect. Many also believe sexual harassment is whining, as their gasbag leader Rush Limbaugh would say.

The bad news for these neanderthals is that some Republicans do get it, you know, like many conservative women.

In the Republican race for the presidential nomination, Newt Gingrich’s support continues to slowly grow, and he is now tied with Mitt Romney for second place, while Herman Cain just edges both of them out for the top spot. Both Cain and Romney have lost support since late October.

In a new CBS News Poll, 61 percent of Republican primary voters say the sexual harassment accusations against Cain won’t make any difference in their vote, but 30 percent say the charges make them less likely to back him, and that rises to 38 percent among women. Cain has lost support among women since last month – from 28 percent in October to 15 percent now. He has lost ground with conservatives and Tea Party supporters as well.

What a gift these womanizers are to Pres. Obama. In his entire first term, he’s never looked so good.

For that matter, Mitt Romney does too, who takes the Republican lead in the latest McClatchy-Marist poll.

The Republican presidential race is being shaken up again, with Mitt Romney retaking the lead, Newt Gingrich surging into second place, and Herman Cain dropping to third place, according to a new McClatchy-Marist nationwide poll released Friday.


Read full story · Comments { 28 }

NBC: Perry to Letterman Tonight

via NBC's Carrie Dann

It’s the hail Mary of political moves.

It also could work, as the right is always willing to come to the rescue of a Republican in free fall. Limbaugh was defending Perry against the Republican establishment from the start on his show today.

Meanwhile, Herman Cain launches CainTruth, which is going after the female accusers as job one.

The other womanizer in the field, Newt Gringrich, gets a PAC.

All of this noise is obliterating Mitt Romney’s debate performance, which was a tour de force, A+. The Mittster just can’t get no respect, because the conservative wingnuts are too busy bolstering the second and third tier rabble.

Great news for Pres. Obama.

Read full story · Comments { 2 }

Update on the The Hillary Effect

Today’s not going to be the day we publish, but I promise we’ll have a big send off for the publication next week! It will be worth the wait.

Some book PR to give you a little more on what it’s all about.


Spanning nearly two decades of American politics, The Hillary Effect is the provocative and insightful story of the first viable female presidential candidate in history to win a primary and do so in spite of her campaign team’s mistakes. And the galvanizing impact that her loss represented for both women and men, in and out of Washington. It revolves around media coverage that treated her differently as first lady, senator and then presidential candidate – not only because she was a woman, but because she was Hillary Clinton.

Candidly written by veteran political analyst, Taylor Marsh, it is the view from a recovering partisan, someone who the Washington Post called a “die hard Clintonite” in their profile of her in 2008.

The Hillary Effect began when Hillary, as first lady, dared to challenge China’s treatment of women. A countless number of women have and will benefit from her presidential loss, the most famous being Sarah Palin (the Tea Party queen of 2010 and first female on a national Republican presidential ticket), who weaves throughout this story as the anti-Hillary. The Hillary Effect also sees Michele Bachman as a player, as the first Republican female to win a straw poll, primary or caucus.

The male leads in this stunning tale are Bill Clinton and President Barack Obama (someone who turned out to be very different from candidate Obama), with David Plouffe and Mark Penn making appearances. The story includes a host of media personalities and their outlets, but also new media and progressive voices, and famous names like Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, Sally Quinn, the late Tim Russert, Richard Wolffe, Laura Ingraham, Liz Cheney, Peggy Noonan, Maureen Dowd, Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and even Bill O’Reilly, who offered Hillary the best interview she would do during the 2008 season.

All of this is seen through the economic and political crises of today, health care, women’s individual freedoms being challenged by the right, Afghanistan, women’s rise around the world, the debt ceiling debate, tax cuts for the wealthy, Occupy Wall Street and an American public disenchanted with Republicans and Democrats, just as the race for 2012 revs up.


Read full story · Comments are closed

Why Would Anyone Vote Republican Today?


The above graphic is compliments of Virginia Republicans, though it really could have come from any GOP office today.

When you look at the anti-democratic actions of Ohio’s Gov. John Kasich, or Gov. Scott Walker in Wisconsin, not to mention the war on women being waged by right-wing zealots across our country, it’s amazing that Democrats aren’t flying high.

For president, you’ve got an alleged sexual harasser, Herman Cain, leading the GOP presidential pack, with his bookend, a death penalty crazed, intellectually challenged Rick Perry, trying to claw his way back up the ranks.

It’s too bad today’s Democratic Party has chosen to capitulate and compromise with Republicans, which we’ll see further when the “super committee” comes in with its recommendations, instead of taking their advantage and pushing it to aid the people. Democrats today no longer have the courage of their convictions or the principles on which the Party has stood for decades.

The email pictured at the top came from the Virginia Loudoun County’s Republican committee.

Gov. McDonnell had the good sense to blast these despicable efforts. Unfortunately, he didn’t say what needed to be said, which is that Pres. Obama is our president and any such dangerous images are un-American and should be investigated by the Secret Service. McDonnell should also fire the entire staff in Loudon Cty.

Gov. Robert F. McDonnell (R) called the e-mail “shameful and offensive,’’ his spokesman Tucker Martin said. “He calls on those involved to apologize for their actions, and to immediately ensure that such imagery is never used again. The governor has long stressed the need for more civility and respect in our politics. An e-mail like this one undermines those goals, offends all Virginians and discredits our entire political process. It will not be tolerated.”

The e-mail, first reported on the blog Too Conservative, has “Halloween 2011” in the subject lines and has several other images, including one of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, whose face has been made to look deformed with one eye bulging out of its socket.

The e-mail invites supporters to a Halloween parade. “LCRC members and Republican candidates: We are going to vanquish the zombies with clear thinking conservative principles and a truckload of Republican candy…It’s fun and a great way to represent our candidates to a ton of voters (and their kids) just before the election.”

Rush Limbaugh translation: It was a joke.

This is who the Republican Party is today, because they’re being run by a bunch of ignorant, some would say crazy, cretins who have no impulse control.

In Gov. McDonald’s Virginia, where I live, George “macaca” Allen, is actually running for Senate again. That he’s being challenged by Tim I-blew-the-2010-midterms-because-I-didn’t-have-the-guts-to-make-an-economic-message Kaine seems fitting. Allen and Kaine representing the perfect examples of everything that’s wrong with both parties.

The same actually goes for Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, both men having a weak ideological core, but no problem saying one thing on the campaign trail and another to the Wall Street jackals who fund their campaigns. Two politicians who are the epitome of the type of men who rise to the top in both parties, toting craven allegiances that leave we the people out in the cold, because it’s all about the best politician money can buy.

So, until Republicans get a handle on the people inside their party who trade in such dangerously racist, violently misogynistic, and anti-American rhetoric and campaign tactics, they don’t deserve a single vote.

But considering what Democrats, as well as progressives in Congress, are letting Republicans get away with, their cowardice doesn’t exactly deserve praise or a vote either.

This, in a nutshell, is American politics as it stands today.

Read full story · Comments { 20 }

Herman Cain Ensnares Rush Limbaugh

The bigger the ego the harder they fall and Rush Limbaugh fell all the way today.

This was a very bad day for Herman Cain who made a classic mistake. He thought he could best good reporters given money and time, with a fine editor on their side, something that proves how arrogant Mr. Cain is, without cause. That Herman Cain dragged Rush Limbaugh down with him was clear during the wingnut’s show today. Watching Cain’s story unravel as the day wore on, El Rushbo was the other casualty, revealing him for the ignorant gas bag he is.

RUSH: Let’s do this Herman Cain story. I started out by talking about Clinton, and Bill Clinton must be laughing himself sick over this hit job from The Politico on Cain. And Cain now has denied it, without question. He has categorically denied any of this. But a story like this involving Bill Clinton, why, Clinton would be getting high fives, millions of dollars of campaign contributions from the NAGs. – Rush Limbaugh

Unfortunately for Limbaugh, Mr. Cain has been dialing back his denials all day.

Now NBC News has verified payment to one woman, too.

NBC News has confirmed that one woman received a settlement from the National Restaurant Association after complaining about inappropriate sexual conduct by Herman Cain. – NBC confirms one Cain accuser received cash settlement

John F. Harris, editor in chief of Politico and the man who shepherded this blockbuster, has not just vaulted Politico into a new sphere. Mr. Harris has helped change new media’s prowess. The online newspaper double sourced their story on Herman Cain, with Harris refusing tonight, in an interview with Lawrence O’Donnell, to say a word other than they got a tip, which led to three weeks of good, solid reporting.

When one of Limbaugh’s callers suggested it might have been a Republican who tipped the story to Politico Rush sounded genuinely surprised. He conceded it might be possible, but he was clearly flabbergasted.

The story has been circulating for a while way under the radar in Washington, D.C., according to reports on cable.

I know people are thinking of Mitt Romney’s team, which is entirely possible, because he’s got a deep bench of people who are out to win, but also who specialize in unearthing dirt on opponents.

It’s all guesswork, but whoever it is that tipped off Politico, I’d bet it was a Republican. Karl Rove? Who knows? But it’s not only possible, it’s the smart play for Republicans to get Cain out of the nomination fight, because he couldn’t survive this, not to mention his campaign finance problems also coming to the surface, in a general election fight.

David Axelrod could take these amateurs out without a plan.

Limbaugh’s unhinged, rambling, off the wall rant over Herman Cain gives you an idea of just how out on a limb he was today.

As the day unfolded, Herman Cain sawed it off.

Rush doesn’t think there is anything you can do to a woman that would possibly be called sexual harassment, something he calls whining.

Read full story · Comments { 19 }

About the Book Cover

The party’s over.
The view from a recovering partisan.

My e-book is scheduled to be published two weeks from today, November 8th. It will be available on Amazon, to download on Kindle, or on Barnes and Noble, as well as your iPad. It’s a busy, exciting time in my world.

Since I announced my book two weeks ago, I’ve had a lot of feedback on the cover. Continue Reading →

Read full story · Comments { 28 }

Rush Limbaugh: Romney is ‘Not a Conservative’

“The Republican base doesn’t want Romney. The Republican base doesn’t want Romney.” – Rush Limbaugh’s opening chant on his radio show today

…and so it begins.

The Republican establishment thinks they’ve won. But if Mitt Romney’s the nominee, will the Tea Party stay around?

Conventional wisdom among non-conservatives and anti Tea Party people is that Republicans and the right will fall in line and back Mitt Romney.

Comments on my FB page have been very interesting today.

Reader GA6thDem said the same thing in the comments, with part of what he said below:

To me the Tea Party was really just the personality based mirror image of the “Obama Movement” … I also think that the majority of tea partiers will swallow hard and vote for Romney. The question in the end is will it be enough?

Today, Rush Limbaugh blew that notion out of the water, as several callers, as they did yesterday, continue to plead with Limbaugh to take Romney on. There was a lone voice pleading with Rush to remember Reagan’s 11th commandment, don’t speak ill of another Republican, and give Mitt Romney a chance.

Limbaugh also took out after Rick Perry today, who [update] couldn’t even get the date of the American Revolution correct, saying he was “too passive” and “needed to dominate, but he didn’t. Then he went further, saying Perry made himself disappear like “an a list magician in Las Vegas,” all of which I tweeted at the time.

As I’ve said before, the prospect of Obama vs. Romney is not particularly an exciting contest. Both candidates could entice challenges, with Rush Limbaugh revealing real unease in the Republican base.

What it also portends, if Romney is the nominee, is a tough Tea Party or evangelical type as vice presidential nominee.

However, any thought that the Republican base is going to blindly sign on to a Mitt Romney nomination discounts the power the Tea Party has built and portends a resurgence of a movement that has lately been slowly losing power and its clout.

Read full story · Comments { 11 }

Taylor Marsh Authors The Hillary Effect – Politics, Sexism and the Destiny of Loss

Due out in November. Available on Amazon.com, on your Kindle, Barnes & Noble, Nook, and iPad.

Spanning nearly two decades of American politics, The Hillary Effect is the provocative and insightful story of the first viable female presidential candidate in history to win a primary and do so in spite of her campaign team’s mistakes. And the galvanizing impact that her loss represented for both women and men, in and out of Washington. It revolves around media coverage that treated her differently as first lady, senator and then presidential candidate – not only because she was a woman, but because she was Hillary Clinton.

Candidly written by veteran political analyst, Taylor Marsh, it is the view from a recovering partisan, someone who the Washington Post called a “die hard Clintonite” in their profile of her in 2008.
The Hillary Effect began when Hillary, as first lady, dared to challenge China’s treatment of women. A countless number of women have and will benefit from her presidential loss, the most famous being Sarah Palin (the Tea Party queen of 2010 and first female on a national Republican presidential ticket), who weaves throughout this story as the anti-Hillary. The Hillary Effect also sees Michele Bachman as a player, as the first Republican female to win a straw poll, primary or caucus.

The male leads in this stunning tale are Bill Clinton and President Barack Obama (someone who turned out to be very different from candidate Obama), with David Plouffe and Mark Penn making appearances. The story includes a host of media personalities and their outlets, but also new media and progressive voices, and famous names like Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, Sally Quinn, the late Tim Russert, Richard Wolffe, Laura Ingraham, Liz Cheney, Peggy Noonan, Maureen Dowd, Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and even Bill O’Reilly, who offered Hillary the best interview she would do during the 2008 season.

All of this is seen through the economic and political crises of today, health care, women’s individual freedoms being challenged by the right, Afghanistan, women’s rise around the world, the debt ceiling debate, tax cuts for the wealthy, Occupy Wall Street and an American public disenchanted with Republicans and Democrats, just as the race for 2012 revs up.

Read full story · Comments { 0 }

Paul Ryan’s ‘Class Warfare’ Whine

Bring on “class warfare” and may the Democrats lean into it.

I guess Mr. Ryan missed the latest poverty statistics. No one is surprised that a Republican sees no virtue in a millionaire minimum tax.

Representative Paul D. Ryan, chairman of the House Budget Committee and a leading proponent of cutting spending on benefit programs like Medicare, said the proposal would weigh heavily on a stagnating economy.

On “Fox News Sunday,” Mr. Ryan said it would add “further instability to our system, more uncertainty, and it punishes job creation.”

“Class warfare,” he said, “may make for really good politics, but it makes for rotten economics.”

Well, if anyone knows about “rotten economics” it’s the man who wants to turn Medicare into a voucher program that will eventually make Medicare obsolete.

Pres. Obama deserves no credit for a move on the millionaire minimum tax, but also backing down on entitlement cutting. He was dragged to this point by the “professional Left” and the polls, which show he’s not only cratering among Independents, but after NY9 has seen the stark reality of his Democratic support go soft, which has made national news with grumbling from insiders.

Some analysts, though not moi, now believe 2012 is the Republicans to lose, but Obama can’t win it. That’s just ludicrous. Having watched Barack Obama back when he was trying to win the nomination I’ve seen how he campaigns and the way Team Obama fights, dirty and relentlessly. I’ve also seen the Republican field and with Rick “ponzi” Perry’s seduction, the only thing they’ll inspire is a third-party bid for president.

But these latest economic developments should infuriate every single movement progressive, because Pres. Obama wasted so much time on selling austerity that it became part of the American bloodstream, even as the American people were showing the way. The White House did the same stupid things on health care.

The middle class is teetering on uncertainty. Minority community unemployment has skyrocketed. …and the rich? They’re doing just fine.

“Class warfare” is exactly what many Americans locked out of the income vein in this country are feeling is required today. In the middle of historic economic unfairness Republicans are talking to their own choir, which is very good news for Democrats, provided the President doesn’t blow it with his fetish for austerity Republicanism.

Mr. Obama begins his pitch in the Rose Garden and will take it to Capitol Hill tonight.

In the meantime, the bootstrap Republicans who tell people lies to get them to vote against their own interests will be hissing “class warfare.” Rush Limbuagh will squeal like a stuffed pig today.

What Ryan and his merry band of robber barons don’t get is that this latest economic shift of Pres. Obama is not just a win-win for him politically, because he’s finally gotten something right economically. But more importantly, at a time when Democrats and progressives had written Pres. Obama off, this gives them renewed hope.

Team Obama has figured out they can’t win without the base being revved up. However, nobody should be fooled. The politics of what’s happening is one thing, but the record on Pres. Obama is that he believes in entitlement cuts reforms and he’s the one who put them on the chopping block. The kicker is so do Republicans, but they want to end Medicare, Social Security and Medicare as we know it. Unless something miraculous develops, come 2012 entitlements will change forever.

Pick your political poison.

Read full story · Comments { 20 }

The part where the light dawns.

It’s amateur hour in the White House briefing room, starring Pres. Obama, because he naively bet his whole position on the premise that he could serve up entitlements to seduce Republicans into making him look good with Independents, but instead gets caught in the age old Republican stiff-arm, which hit Obama and his team in the face like a fire hydrant breaking open on a smoldering summer city street. But instead of getting cooled off by the blast it sent Pres. Obama into orbit. Whenever you see him as pissed off as he was on Friday night you can bet he’s worried about his own political hide. Continue Reading →

Read full story · Comments { 74 }

House Republicans Remove Any Doubt They’re Sane

Cut, cap and… baloney passed. Shocker, the Tea Party crazies are running the congressional asylum. Passing anything that has no chance of getting through the Senate, let alone a veto by Pres. Obama, is such a waste of energy. Watching some of Cantor’s bloviating on the House floor makes me wonder what’s wrong with some people in Virginia.

Of note, Reps. Michele Bachmann and Ron Paul voted no, because as presidential candidates to be taken seriously when eying the general election audience they can’t flaunt lunacy.

Of course, some Democrats voted for it too, but mainly to keep a primary challenge away, which anyone can appreciate, with Jim Cooper doing so as well even though he’s in a very blue district.

But it’s quite interesting how the House Democratic Caucus dealt with the event this morning. They sent out the above audio excerpt of Pres. Ronald Reagan’s 1987 radio address.

“Congress consistently brings the Government to the edge of default before facing its responsibility. This brinkmanship threatens the holders of government bonds and those who rely on Social Security and veterans benefits. Interest rates would skyrocket, instability would occur in financial markets, and the Federal deficit would soar. The United States has a special responsibility to itself and the world to meet its obligations. It means we have a well-earned reputation for reliability and credibility – two things that set us apart from much of the world.”

These words are lost on sober politicians. They’d call Reagan a RINO. …or worse. Hell, he’d get a primary challenge.

The same people who invoke Reagan over and over again have no clue of his history of raising taxes 11 times during his presidency. This includes Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and the other wingnut bloviators.

As for what Bruce Bartlett, a former Reagan man, thinks of the amateurism of the Tea Party balanced budget amendment. He calls it a “phony.”

Where have all the serious conservatives gone?

As for serious Democrats, after what the Gang of 7 served up, we’ll see if the Progressive Caucus budges on entitlements. The pressure will be intense, because House members sent a letter to Speaker Boehner saying they want to take a vote on it, including Jim Cooper. From The Hill:

“We applaud this effort and ask that you provide the opportunity to vote on this proposal as part of any request for an increase in the debt ceiling before the Aug. 2 debt ceiling deadline,” Wolf and Cooper wrote.

Cooper has been involved in New Democrat discussions over the debt limit in recent days. Members of the business-friendly coalition, which comprises 43 Democrats, talked about the Gang of Six proposal at a meeting Tuesday, and its leadership, led by chairman Rep. Joe Crowley (N.Y.), released a statement supporting a “grand bargain” on deficit reduction and the debt limit. Cooper is also a member of the more conservative Blue Dog coalition.

Oh, make it stop.

The Gang of 7 proposal punts on details about Social Security and the hurt is in those details:

The plan would be held at the Senate desk until a Social Security fix is found, and if that fix does not get the 60 votes required, the rest of the deficit plan is voided. The reform must ensure 75 years of solvency for Social Security, according to the Gang of Six, but how to achieve that is left up to the Finance Committee. If Finance cannot agree, a group of 10 senators — five from each party — can bring a reform bill to the floor.

… Chained CPI would cause Social Security benefits and tax deductions to be lowered, the use of which has been loudly opposed by seniors’ lobbying groups. To address senior concerns, the plan exempts Supplemental Security Income from the shift for five years and provides a minimum benefit equal to 125 percent of the poverty line for five years.

Social Security is solvent for 25 years now and lowering COLA is insane. What are these Democrats thinking? They need to find a better way to “strengthen” Social Security.

What we need is a straight up, 11th hour debt ceiling increase if need be, nothing more and that’s what I’m hoping for, which as a last resort could still be the devious McConnell plan. Visualize it, people.

Read full story · Comments { 13 }

Testosterone, Weinergate, Women and Leadership

“We inject less libido… We don’t necessarily inject our own egos…” – Christiane Lagrande, French Foreign Minister (possible IMF replacement for Strauss-Kahn)

Foreign policy studies find that when women are included in a nation’s national dialogue that country has not only a better chance of stability, but it’s the only way developing nations can thrive. There are now studies that women make companies more economically successful when they’re in the lead. On ABC’s “This Week” yesterday, Christiane Amanpour teed up the topic with Cecilia Attias (ex-wife to Pres. Sarkozy), Torie Clarke, Claire Shipman.

Rush Limbaugh was even more unhinged than usual today because of this subject. Limbaugh talked about the “chick-i-fi-cation” of the U.S. One female caller said that women today having affairs with politicians are “greedy,” because in the old days they’d keep their mouth shut. Classic example of Rush’s female audience. This same caller opined that men should run the household, while Rush blamed liberal women for the fate of a bullies, Weiner and everything that ails the male populace.

After all these years of tuning in to Rush, however briefly when I can. I’m still amazed that his criteria for a successful woman includes marriage, children, heterosexualism, but especially beauty.

But while countries and corporations need women to thrive and succeed, there are other examples where women haven’t made any difference at all.

Where foreign policy, diplomacy and militarism meet, women still fail as miserably as men, because they’re intent on channeling what any man would do or say. Sometimes, of course, foreign policy answers aren’t gender based, with the obvious answer showing itself no matter the gender. But in tough geopolitical situations, so far women still have not found their own way.

Let’s remember who was at the forefront of Obama’s decision to get involved in Libya, which began with Samantha Power and Dr. Susan Rice, but also Sec. Clinton, who was convinced bombing Libya was the right move. It wasn’t.

There is no evidence whatsoever of women being more restrained, thoughtful or less militaristic. See Liz Cheney, Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, but also women like Anne-Marie Slaughter, who wrote an op-ed entitled “Fiddling While Libya Burns.” You could also add Sec. Madeleine Albright’s comment that Colin Powell recalled in his memoir: “What’s the point of having this superb military you’re always talking about, if we can’t use it?” It blew his mind.

Read full story · Comments { 3 }