TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Tag Archives | Rush Limbaugh

Romney’s Critics Stirring Up Climategate

“Bye-bye, nomination,” Rush Limbaugh said Tuesday on his radio talk show after playing a clip of Romney’s climate remark. “Another one down. We’re in the midst here of discovering that this is all a hoax. The last year has established that the whole premise of man-made global warming is a hoax, and we still have presidential candidates that want to buy into it.” – Romney draws early fire from conservatives over views on climate change

Rush isn’t the only critic.

“Remind me again: Why is this guy considered the front-runner for the Republican nomination?” blogger Doug Brady wrote Friday on the site Conservatives4Palin after Romney’s remarks in New Hampshire. “I may be going out on a limb here, but shouldn’t the Republican candidate oppose Democrat positions? Or am I living in the past and hopelessly naïve?” – Mitt Romney: No apologies on climate change stance

First it was Donald Trump who made Tea Partiers pissed by stealing their thunder, which brought Sarah Palin out after a long absence after the Loughner shooting and her video statement debacle.

So, if Romney looks like he’s headed for the nomination, is that the tipping point for Sarah Palin to ride to the rescue? She’s said all along that if she’s needed she’ll run. Well, wouldn’t a Romney candidacy now be the worst for the flat earth climate deniers?

All Sarah will need is a horse and some bells (leave the musket guns at home), because her fans are ready.

Read full story · Comments { 2 }

Romney: ‘The world is getting warmer’

The old Mitt Romney would have come to Friday’s gathering of religious conservatives and waxed on about his opposition to abortion, his belief in God and the importance of family values. The new Mitt Romney only briefly mentioned “the sanctity of human life’’ and cast unemployment as the moral crisis of our time. His economy-focused pitch at the Faith and Freedom Conference was a sign that the former Massachusetts governor, who officially launched his second bid for the White House on Thursday, has learned from the mistakes of his last campaign. – Romney Sticks with Economic Message at Faith and Freedom Conference

Mitt Romney has decided that joining the real world is the only way he’s going to win the general election.

“I believe the world is getting warmer, and I believe that humans have contributed to that,” he told a crowd of about 200 at a town hall meeting in Manchester, New Hampshire. “It’s important for us to reduce our emissions of pollutants and greenhouse gases that may be significant contributors.” – Reuters

Conventional wisdom is that any Republican trying to win the nomination will have to fall off the right-wing cliff to get it, which will make him or her unelectable against Pres. Obama.

Romney is betting, smartly, that there are a lot of Republicans who would vote for a sane Republican if given the chance.

Now, Mr. Romney has a ways to go from flip-flopping opportunist to rational man of reality, but embracing environmental science is not a bad beginning, as long as it’s led by an economic message, which Romney just might have learned is the only issue that will win him the GOP prize.

Perhaps he’s also decided that the flat earth wackos like Sarah Palin will never be on his side no matter what crazy talk he offers up, so he might as well go out with some dignity, which just might also get him the nomination.

Read full story · Comments { 5 }

Ed Schultz Apologizes

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Schultz is on voluntary unpaid absence for the coming week, with MSNBC issuing a statement late yesterday about Ed Schultz’s embarrassing public belch.

The comments over at Ed’s MSNBC page are wholly supportive of the blue collar talk radio hero, whose passions drive his programs, with quite a few of the monitored comments culled out.

Schultz was wrong and what he said was incredibly insulting.

Rush Limbaugh accused Pres. Bill Clinton of being a drug trafficker, while “Reverend” Jerry Falwell suggested Clinton might be a murderer, even as Sean Hannity postulated that Vince Foster might have been murdered and questioned Hillary Rodham Clinton’s possible involvement of a cover-up. Hannity dragged this lie back out during the ’08 primary season.

But if you want to know why Mitch Daniels listened to the women in his family and chose not to run for president, this whole sorry spectacle reveals a primary reason.

It makes you wonder if Sarah Palin, whose run-ins with the media have comprised her entire national rise, can toughen up enough to take what would come if she says yes to running in 2012.

Read full story · Comments { 15 }

Ed Schultz Calls Laura Ingraham a ‘Right Wing Slut’

**UPDATED**

“And what do the Republicans thinking about?” Schultz said. “They’re not thinking about their next-door neighbor. They’re just thinking about how much this is going to cost. President Obama is going to be visiting Joplin, Mo., on Sunday but you know what they’re talking about, like this right-wing slut, what’s her name?, Laura Ingraham? Yeah, she’s a talk slut. You see, she was, back in the day, praising President Reagan when he was drinking a beer overseas. But now that Obama’s doing it, they’re working him over.” – Daily Caller

Appalling.

Ed Schultz gives blue collar and union a bad name. My husband had two words for Schultz: “low class.”

It didn’t happen on MSNBC, but Schultz should not only apologize on his radio show, but on his TV show as well.

I have no idea what it is about MSNBC that pushes it toward hiring misogynistic cretins or at the very least, disrespectful Neanderthals, see David Shuster, even Chris Matthews (Keith Olbermann too). What makes MSNBC believe that demeaning women in politics isn’t an ethics issue?

It’s the 21st century, so this type of crap shouldn’t be condoned anywhere, no matter the party. It no longer passes as boys will be boys, not even on a radio show that tilts to truckers or low info listeners.

Rush Limbaugh has been getting away with his misogyny for years because Republicans don’t care what their people call women or how they treat them verbally. The low class mini me versions of Rush, people like Sean Hannity and Mark Levin, are even worse. I’ve been writing about Limbaugh for years, whether it’s “feminizas, “nags” or “reporterettes,” all the GOP does is shrug and turn the other way.

Political talk radio like what Limbaugh and Shultz, even Ms. Ingraham, do is on the decline. This is just part of the reason why.

UPDATE: MSNBC has suspended Schultz without pay.

STATEMENT FROM MSNBC REGARDING ED SCHULTZ:

MSNBC management met with Ed Schultz this afternoon and accepted his offer to take one week of unpaid leave for the remarks he made yesterday on his radio program. Ed will address these remarks on his show tonight, and immediately following begin his leave. Remarks of this nature are unacceptable and will not be tolerated.

Read full story · Comments { 10 }

The Ugly, The Bad, & The Good Can Oust the Worst

Donald Trump is upping the ante against President Barack Obama’s legitimacy, raising questions on Monday night about how the president was admitted to two Ivy League schools. Trump openly questioned how Obama, who he said had been a “terrible student,” got accepted into Columbia University for undergraduate studies and then Harvard Law School. – Donald Trump: How did Barack Obama get into Ivies?

The un-Obama in the opening act of circus 2012 is popular for a reason. Listen to any politician today and you’ll get it. Crazy, wrong, right or insulting, however you judge Donald Trump, he is fearless and speaking his mind bluntly, openly and without reservation. He’s not a “lamestream media” wimp, as Sarah Palin is, nor is he inside government; there is also a chance he’ll never get past the opening act stage, though that hardly matters, because he’s blown out the stench of calculation and caution, even polite political patter. No matter where he ends up it’s a lesson in how starved people are for anyone speaking in terms that they can understand, no matter what’s being said. It’s not the messenger or even the message as much as the audacious Americanism of Donald Trump elbowing the establishment off the scene, with there something low brow about Trump’s trash talk.

It’s the lesson Democrats never learned from the health care debate. People won’t accept something they can’t understand and if there was anything that was incomprehensible it was Pres. Obama and the Democratic message on health care and the Affordability Care Act.

This is one hurdle that’s very tough for Pres. Obama to get over, because he is always engaged in a circular conversation, rarely coming down anywhere on the declarative side of things.

This segues perfectly into the latest pitch for Pres. Obama, given by Ezra Klein, who posits Obama is a Republican and that’s not bad, especially since he’s the only one standing in front of the crazies taking over. It’s an insider opinion from someone 4 years too late, but is no doubt going to be hailed as a way to make the case for Pres. Obama in 2012. People who’ve been reading here since 2007 will recognize the template, the tardiness proving that “political analysts” are not all equal.

Segue to Lawrence O’Donnell, who eviscerates the notion that Rush Limbaugh or any other of his bootstrap political hack club are remotely interested in aiding the poor or the middle class, but instead are only concerned with championing wealth for its own sake, even if it ends the middle class as we know it, which Limbaugh did today on his show making the case for corporations.

Lastly, Rachel Maddow, well, you really should watch this one for yourself. It reveals why movement progressives have to keep on keeping on, because they are the heart of what people want, even if the ignoramuses in Congress and the White House believe austerity is king.

Now Democrats just have to digest that to save the party they have to weed out the conservatives who think being closer to Republicans is a virtue instead of a curse. Then digest that Pres. Obama is not your friend, no politician is, especially once he or she thinks they can sell out principles and make the lives of the working class harder.

The more independent you are from the political powers and the more courage you have to walk away from the established elite the more power you have as a voter and the quicker you’ll change what’s not been working in this country for a very long time.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Read full story · Comments { 18 }

GALLUP: Trump Boosted by Mod-Liberals, Sarah Palin’s Only Hope is If Huckabee Doesn’t Run

Donald Trump debuts in a first-place tie in Gallup’s latest update of Republicans’ preferences for the party’s 2012 presidential nomination among potential contenders. Trump ties Mike Huckabee at 16%, with Mitt Romney close behind at 13%. Sarah Palin is the only other potential Republican candidate to earn double-digit support. – Huckabee, Trump, Romney Set Pace for 2012 GOP Field

Congress is on recess, so if you hadn’t already noticed it’s not just Easter break, but also poll season. So if you’re still confused about why Donald Trump grabbed on to birtherism see this poll.



Gallup surveyed Republicans and Republican-leaning independents and found Trump and Huckabee tied, with Donald Trump at 21% among moderate-liberals, 13% among conservatives; Huckabee has 13% among moderate-liberals, 18% among conservatives. Trump’s trouble with conservative Republicans or leaning Republican types is that many conservatives listen to talk radio where there’s been a blitz against him. Rush Limbaugh launched Trump before he dove into birtherism, having him on where Trump first spoke about his 25% tariff on Chinese goods and trade most of the interview (which I tweeted about at the time).

However, as you can see above, 19% of moderate to liberal Republicans or Republican-leading Independents have “no opinion” of any of the GOP possible primary candidates, which is the equivalent to none of the above; 10% of conservatives feeling the same way. It’s quite revealing and shows there is room for an alternative candidate campaigning on sane, say a Jon Huntsman, who could counter Trump on China through his experience, but he might rather wait until 2016, too.

The hottest choices on the Republican side will remain un-candidates, because 2012 isn’t the year the hot pols want to run, because though Pres. Obama is definitely beatable, having an open field in 2016 is preferred for Chris Christie, Marco Rubio and even Jeb Bush.

Any smart Republican knows that Obama will be a formidable opponent, with the odds still good he’ll win reelection, because too many people are Democratic Party voter drones who’ll never alter their voting habits no matter what Pres. Obama does.

The birthers’ front man, Donald Trump, caught fire with crazy, but he’s not so stupid as to have embraced Rep. Paul Ryan’s ludicrous economic hallucinations, so even if die hard conservatives find him wanting, his politics of convenience has a ring of possibility amidst a Republican crowd comprised of a bunch of misfit wannabes.

This may have started out as a lark for Donald Trump, and he still may not run, but his continuing presence at the top tier of the unannounced candidate list should be enough for anyone to say what the hell, I’m in. This has become the consensus, the “conventional wisdom.” Against Pres. Obama Trump would become the billionaire underdog.

As for the darling of the 2010 midterms, Sarah Palin, her only hope for 2012 at this point is if Mike Huckabee doesn’t run.

Oh, and if you’re still a Trig Trutherism wacko, the bookend to birtherism, Justin Eliott debunks the silliness one more time.

Read full story · Comments { 11 }

Will Trump Tornado Pull Palin In?

**UPDATED – BUMPED**

Real estate mogul Donald Trump touted his net worth as a selling point over likely presidential contender and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. “I’m a much bigger business man and have (a) much, much bigger net worth. I mean, my net worth is many, many, many times Mitt Romney,” Trump said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “I built a very big net worth and I’d like to put that ability … to work for this country.”Trump: I’m ‘much bigger’ than Romney

Watching the Right come unglued as their circus primaries unwind is the most fun I’ve had watching politics in a very long time. Seeing Sean Hannity’s face fall when Mr. Trump criticized Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget on Thursday was a priceless moment on Fox TV. Now that Donald Trump is “leading” in a meaningless poll of mostly unannounced candidates, the Tea Party peanut gallery is chiming in with something developing that could, though there is still no movement yet, but could help nudge Sarah Palin into the 2012 presidential race. If Trump would run as an Independent then, well, no matter who wins the Republican primary, we might actually have an interesting election, especially now that Sarah Palin’s sounding like a candidate again.

First the establishment came for Sarah, now they’re after Donald Trump. Over a week ago I wrote he’s the the un-Obama. Rich Lowry picks up that thread, as the Republican Right begin they’re onslaught to take Trump down a notch, because the entire Republican field is making the GOP look like a collection of seriously wacky nitwits.

Trump wants to be the anti-Obama. Obama is too soft; Trump is tough. Obama knows nothing about business; Trump is God’s gift to American capitalism. Obama is painfully thoughtful in his affect; Trump is brash. They share much more important qualities in common, though. Like the Obama of 2008, Trump is an arrogant celebrity with a talent for branding who knows much less than he thinks and vastly overestimates his ability to fix the country’s problems. We’ve been here before. Give me humble. Give me boring. Give me wonky. Give me anything but another celebrity apprentice.

Yesterday Andrew Breitbart tweeted a couple of missives in support of Palin:

My goal is to intro David Mamet & other prominent @SarahPalinUSA supporters to Palins. In Hollywood there are tons.

I’m still waiting for the wrong position @SarahPalinUSA has taken. Or idea she misstated. They hate her because she is right.

Sean Hannity’s mini-me, Mark Levin, squealed like a man worried about things getting away from his fellow wingnut warrior, going on about Trump’s “record” as a private citizen. It seems the Tea Party crowd is all for citizen activists unless it’s an independent person finding fault with someone who deserves it. For one that would be George W. Bush, which Donald Trump is on record as saying was the worst president ever. Like many Americans, in fact the majority as it eventually turned out, Trump also was furious about being lied to over Iraq.

Mr. Trump told Rush Limbaugh yesterday (audio) that he might be surprised about what he decides. The tone in Mr. Trump’s voice was mischievous enough to tease he’s closer to running than not. Again, I’m still not convinced, though his interviews this week sound far more aggressive than he has earlier, no doubt bolstered by the polls.

But the Tea Party freaking out over Donald Trump catching fire means something is shifting. The establishment elite had to eventually speak up, so that was a given.

What the wingnut crew doesn’t seem to understand is that Breitbart and the mini-me Levin tape, as well as the CNN tape with Blitzer, only makes Donald Trump more attractive to conservative Independents who will no way vote for Obama or Mitt Romney.

Donald Trump’s best bet has always been as an Independent, with a trial Republican balloon the way to get there. However, therein lies the conundrum. There’s really no path to winning as an Independent, which means his pledge of only running if he can win is put to the test by the backlash going on right now by the Tea Party who are balking that Trump could take the Republican nomination, which is up for grabs.

On the sidelines sits Sarah Palin. I’m guessing with Trump’s rise, but also Michele Bachmann taking some energy out of Iowa, Palin’s receiving a lot of fan mail and encouragement from Tea Party people to please consider running in 2012. It’s also her only real shot, as politics doesn’t wait for anyone. Her fans yelping… The Tea Party needs you, Sarah! Michele Bachmann can’t win and we can’t let Trump use our movement! Run, Sarah, run! This is the chant she’s been waiting for, the push she’ll need to move, because she can’t disappoint the people.

Or maybe this whole thing will end with Mitt Romney winning the nomination, but I just don’t see how he makes it through the primaries. Does the Republican establishment still have that kind of power? We’ll soon see.

This post has been updated, bumped from 4.16.

Read full story · Comments { 47 }

Take a Load Off and Talk About…



I love Coco. My husband gets up at 5:00 a.m., so he can’t stay up to watch him, but I’m awake until the wee hours doing research, reading and writing, so I rarely miss him. I thought this bit was particularly hilarious.

Speaking of laughable, it’s 2000 all over again in Wisconsin.

The latest vote count in the state Supreme Court race in Winnebago County indicates incumbent David Prosser is leading Assistant Attorney General JoAnne Kloppenburg in votes.

A tally compiled by The Associated Press Wednesday and used by news organizations statewide, including the Journal Sentinel, indicated Kloppenburg was leading the race by 204 votes. Figures on Winnebago County’s website are now different from those collected by the AP.

Rush Limbaugh was talking about voter fraud today on his show, blaming Democrats. I’m reminded of the Brooks Brothers riot in 2000. If you don’t remember it use The Google.

Read full story · Comments { 10 }

Stiglitz: ‘Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%’

However, talking with Republican pollsters, strategists and veteran campaign professionals recently, I now hear sounds of concern that haven’t been heard in almost two years. Among the worries the party now has is that a government shutdown could get blamed on the GOP. Additionally, these party insiders believe that taking on entitlements, specifically Medicare, could jeopardize the party’s hold on the House, its strong chances of taking the Senate and the stronghold that the party has been established with older white voters—not coincidentally, Medicare recipients.Charlie Cook

Stiglitz may be writing the message, but it’s being delivered by the Republican Party and the Right, which is evident in what Rep. Paul Ryan delivered today.

Democrats and progressives, especially the movement side of the equation, should get out in front and start pointing the finger at the culprits of this massive maneuver to remake America. It’s a cinch Barack Obama won’t, because he’s too afraid of his own political shadow and courting those fickle independents who actually want leadership rather than a President who tilts with windmills.

Read Stiglitz in Vanity Fair:

It’s no use pretending that what has obviously happened has not in fact happened. The upper 1 percent of Americans are now taking in nearly a quarter of the nation’s income every year. In terms of wealth rather than income, the top 1 percent control 40 percent. Their lot in life has improved considerably. Twenty-five years ago, the corresponding figures were 12 percent and 33 percent. One response might be to celebrate the ingenuity and drive that brought good fortune to these people, and to contend that a rising tide lifts all boats. That response would be misguided. While the top 1 percent have seen their incomes rise 18 percent over the past decade, those in the middle have actually seen their incomes fall. For men with only high-school degrees, the decline has been precipitous—12 percent in the last quarter-century alone. All the growth in recent decades—and more—has gone to those at the top. In terms of income equality, America lags behind any country in the old, ossified Europe that President George W. Bush used to deride. Among our closest counterparts are Russia with its oligarchs and Iran. While many of the old centers of inequality in Latin America, such as Brazil, have been striving in recent years, rather successfully, to improve the plight of the poor and reduce gaps in income, America has allowed inequality to grow. [...]

People in this country always side with a champion who’s for the middle class.

The problem with the Tea Party crowd is as old a right-wing radio, though its roots go deeper. The Tea Party people want voters to double down on voting against their own interest. Rush has made his fortune on this mantra.

Reagan made a revolution on it.

Democrats and progressives need to stop it from happening again.

So if it takes a government shutdown, so be it. There is absolutely nothing to be gained by Democrats caving further on sucking up the Republican economic message. Obama and the Democrats caving on extending the Bush tax cuts turned us down this road and at some times you need to say enough is enough.

Any Democrat who votes for a budget package that broadens Pentagon spending should be primaried and voted out, no exceptions.

The latest report from Sam Stein is that Pres. Obama has rejected the Republican ploy of funding the Pentagon, while stiffing the American people, to keep the government shutdown from happening.

Democrats are on the side of the angels on this and need to stop Paul Ryan’s wholesale sell off of the American safety net. Taking on the ‘Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%’ reality should be next, which is predicated on the absurd refusal to raise taxes on the mil-billionaire class, ending the Bush tax cut extensions, while also keying in on farm subsidies and corporate welfare, while also changing the tax code so GE actually pays their taxes.

A little wealthy patriotism is long overdue, but Democrats and progressives, not Obama, will have to be the enforcers.


TM NOTE: Also see Yves Smith on Stiglitz.

Read full story · Comments { 10 }

The Ideological Roadmap of Paul Ryan’s Budget Scheme

There’s a reason Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity have been pushing the Heritage Foundation mercilessly on their show for months and it was to pave the way for Paul Ryan and his Heritage Foundation hallucinations.

This partisan ideological shop is the driving engine for Rep. Ryan’s math, who in using the Heritage Center for Data Analysis as his cover conjured up the stamp of right-wing approval for his “Path to Prosperity.”

It’s going to solve all of our debt problems and even make parents able to stand their teenagers.

From Rep. Paul Ryan:

Our budget, which we call The Path to Prosperity, is very different. For starters, it cuts $6.2 trillion in spending from the president’s budget over the next 10 years, reduces the debt as a percentage of the economy, and puts the nation on a path to actually pay off our national debt. Our proposal brings federal spending to below 20% of gross domestic product (GDP), consistent with the postwar average, and reduces deficits by $4.4 trillion.

A study just released by the Heritage Center for Data Analysis projects that The Path to Prosperity will help create nearly one million new private-sector jobs next year, bring the unemployment rate down to 4% by 2015, and result in 2.5 million additional private-sector jobs in the last year of the decade. It spurs economic growth, with $1.5 trillion in additional real GDP over the decade. According to Heritage’s analysis, it would result in $1.1 trillion in higher wages and an average of $1,000 in additional family income each year. – The GOP Path to Prosperity, by Rep. Paul Ryan

With the Heritage Foundation helping to package Ryan’s “GOP Path to Prosperity” what could possibly go wrong?

But Mr. Ryan and his backers are a great example of not thinking about tomorrow and instead pressing your ideology today, because you know you’ve got opponents who won’t call you out publicly, but whose default reaction is to always cave.

It helps that many Americans simply can’t do the math.

Here’s a snippet of an article from over at Politico that I think paints a perfect tableau of what Obama, Reid, Boehner and the Republicans face tomorrow when they meet and continue to hash out the budget before Friday.

[...] There were hints over the weekend that Obama could call Boehner’s bluff and refuse to sign another stopgap spending bill absent a deal this week. But having stayed on the sidelines so long, it could be too late for the president to intervene so forcefully and achieve a settlement before Friday.

Reid’s own hand is weaker because of the divisions in his caucus that have led him to avoid Senate floor votes — therefore robbing him of a record to point to against the House. Boehner again hammered home this point Monday, but he is also vulnerable, walking a narrow line between placating the right wing and achieving the legislative goals he wants as speaker. [...]

Pres. Obama, Democrats and progressives don’t know how to do what Ryan and the Tea Party are pushing Boehner to do. Instead, Democrats game out the politics, ignore their own principles in order to get a deal at any cost, which always includes Obama caving in to what the Republicans and the right-wing want, because Pres. Obama would rather do anything than stand on a line and make the Democratic case for the budget the Democrats want and know is better for the American people. Then there’s that other problem: that progressives on Obama’s long lackey list think he knows best even when he’s silent.

What’s continually frustrating is that Democrats aren’t making their side of the argument, which includes revenue streams to raise taxes on mil-billionaires, while also rolling back the Bush tax cuts, then going into the Pentagon budget, including accelerating our exit from Afghanistan and Iraq, adding a tariff on imported Chinese goods, ending farm subsidies and corporate welfare, too.

I’ve never seen anything like what’s going on with this budget, never mind that Rep. Paul Ryan hasn’t earned and doesn’t deserve such limelight. That he’s getting away with it is monumentally embarrassing. Seriously, ending Medicare in ten years, then gutting Social Security? The man thinks math doesn’t impact living, breathing people. Not only is what he’s suggesting horrific public policy, but it will devastate the lives of scores of people if it’s enacted and cause retirement plan managers to jump off roofs. But at least Ryan is embracing SecDef Gates Pentagon recommendations, even if he’s calling them “inefficiencies” instead of long overdue defense cuts. After all, he doesn’t want the heads of his own caucus to explode en masse.

Meanwhile, as Rep. Paul Ryan unloads his hocus pocus Democrats in the House are talking about offering up a alternative budget to counter him. First they have to finish their tea.

Read full story · Comments { 9 }

Republican Plan for 2012: Birtherism

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) has previously said that if she ran for president, the “first thing” she’d do at the first debate would be to present her birth certificate. Not that she would have much of a choice, if the state lawmaker she’s expected to hire to manage her operations in Iowa has his way. Bachmann, who has all-but announced she’s running, is reportedly planning to bring on Iowa state Sen. Kent Sorenson—the author of a recent birther bill—as her political director in the presidential bellwether state.Mother Jones

It’s coming.

Sean Hannity teased the trailer today on his radio show.

One starting point is Donald Trump, who’s charge is to legitimize birtherism.

It’s not so much that Mr. Trump wants to run for president. It’s that Republicans need a front man willing to simply ask questions who hasn’t anything to risk. That’s Trump.

Today Sean Hannity started off by simply saying Trump was only asking questions and everyone is in an uproar. What’s wrong with asking questions? The next thing out of his mouth was how birtherism is a legitimate issue, because even the notorious Roger Stone says there is a “huge niche,” out there interested in the topic. (Roger Stone helped bring down Eliot Spitzer, the most effective sheriff of Wall Street we’ve ever had.) Trump’s case begins with mentioning the fact he has people from his past who remember him, but Barack Obama does not. What’s up with that?

Taking it to “The View,” Donald Trump mainstreamed it.

Yesterday Rush applauded Trump, saying he’s only giving Obama a chance to explain:

On Limbaugh’s show Thursday, the radio talker Limbaugh sided with Trump’s beating of the birth certificate drum. “You and I have known all along that we’re dealing with a man-child here who has, literally, no qualifications, no experience, and according to Donald Trump now, no birth certificate,” Limbaugh declared.

Trump is performing a valuable service here. He is attempting to help Obama out of a jam. You can’t say Trump is a kook right-wing birther. Trump realized the problem that Obama faces here with credibility. He’s giving him a chance here to establish some credibility by producing the birth certificate,” Limbaugh added.

Performing a valuable service is exactly what Trump is doing for Republicans, for business, too, and being applauded by Rush isn’t by accident. Trump can afford to talk it up. He’s got nothing to lose.

Right-wing radio is where Republican campaigns start. I go way back with the medium, having studied it for 20 years. It’s where they get out the vote, create the narrative, start it rolling. It’s the connection to communities a.m. stations provide that Democrats have never understood.

There have been hints before, the many birther bills, including Rep. Bachmann’s first likely presidential hire, Iowa state Sen. Kent Sorenson, who offered one up in Bachmann’s home state of Iowa.

That’s nothing compared to what’s coming.

Today Sean Hannity mentioned Jerome Corsi, the Swiftboat Veterans for Truth troll who helped take down war hero John Kerry. Sean reported there will be a book out in May by Corsi on the subject of Pres. Obama and his birth certificate. I couldn’t verify Hannity’s claim, but he said he’s going to give Corsi a lot of leeway to air his case, because he’s only asking questions.

Being Friday on wingnut radio you never know about these things, but I’ve felt for quite some time that this birther issue was no mere flight of fanatical haters and racists, though there are plenty of both where Obama is concerned.

Republicans believe they can create enough doubt about Barack Obama to push an election towards their guy, Mitt Romney, who is not going to take no for an answer this time. He is going to be the nominee and he’s prepared for the long slog to make it happen, while others do the dirty work, as always happens in these things. Having warned about Romney since 2006, even as Obama looks unbeatable, there is no doubt there won’t be near the enthusiasm for his reelection, because people have soured on his betrayals of progressivism.

As I already wrote about, a Democratic insider said to me recently, if Romney makes it through the primaries he’s dangerous, because Barack Obama has never run against a competent Republican.

Rush Limbaugh said on his radio show today that whoever is willing to take it to Obama will win this thing and Republicans can’t be worried about charges of racism or anything else.

There is no one more dangerous than Jerome Corsi with a book of ferocious political fiction, with the entire right-wing audience hanging on every word, while someone like Donald Trump, though there will be many others, including Bachmann who will produce her birth certificate when she announces, who aren’t as interested in the presidency as much as their own power and the perks they’ll get for targeting the President. Taking one for the team to legitimize the question in the light of day like Trump did on ABC, the biggest barker could get a cabinet position, access or maybe the vice presidency.

All of these different birtherism mentions are not happening by accident. The playing field is wide and deep, with Republicans never shy about scorched earth. It’s what they do.

This also isn’t 2008 when people couldn’t wait to rush George W. Bush out of the White House, eager to usher in an era of a new kind of politics. Instead, Obama’s neutered the Democratic Party and rendered the progressive movement mute and irrelevant, because if anyone ever deserved a primary challenge on the issues alone, starting with civil liberties, it’s Barack Obama. Maybe instead of talking nonsense of impeachment Dennis Kucinich should stand up and challenge Obama on the grounds he’s sold Democrats out, because nothing could be truer.

Republicans are preparing for battle, not an election, a battle. It’s already begun against the unions, in McCarthyite actions, against Planned Parenthood, and it won’t stop there. Since Barack Obama won’t fight for the tenets of the Democratic Party the Republicans have decided to take them all down.

It’s also coming through the innocent questions of birtherism made by sly surrogates, helped along through the lies and treachery of people like Jerome Corsi, and I don’t think Barack Obama or his team are remotely prepared for it.


UPDATE: Jerome Corsi’s book now confirmed.

UPDATE 2: Compilation article cross-posted over at TheModerateVoice.

Read full story · Comments { 65 }

Rush Limbaugh and the Republican Field for 2012

It’s true that Palin relies on shallow talking points, but where do these come from? They come from the institutions and leaders of the movement that is supposedly so concerned with ideas. Palin is disinterested in ideas, and she has flourished in the conservative media for years. She does rely on shallow talking points, and legions of conservative pundits have repeatedly defended her against charges that she is ignorant and incurious. Everything about her public persona since she received the VP nomination has been built up around tapping into resentment, grievance, and identity politics, all of which are in one way or another antithetical to critical thinking and substantive discussion of policy, and for a while most of her new detractors said nothing or gushed about how wonderful she was. – Palin and the “Party of Ideas”

Mike, Michele, Newt and Sarah lead the 2012 pack. “Frontrunner” Mitt Romney is well back of the populist wannabes.



Mr. Huckabee is the only one out of the four who could possibly wage a decent fight against Obama. However, in the end will suburban Republican women vote for him? There are real doubts.

Sarah Palin finds herself slipping, which reveals a couple of things. The Republican establishment’s war on her is working, even if her own self-inflicted “blood-libel” wound was far worse. But also that her unwillingness to jump into the race early is allowing for others of her brand type to gain traction, specifically Michele Bachmann.

Republicans were hands off when Sarah Palin was leading them to victory in 2010. But looking to 2012 she presents real problems. The Republican boys’ club therefore has decided she’s finally outlived her usefulness.

All of this had Rush Limbaugh genuinely perplexed yesterday, while freaking out over Palin being compared to Al Sharpton. The transcript isn’t as stunning as listening to it live, but here it is: What’s the Problem with Palin?

[...] But this rising vitriol from the “conservative intellectual” bench is mystifying to me. (sigh) I don’t get this comparison to Al Sharpton. I don’t know where that comes from. That’s Matt Labash at the Weekly Standard. I don’t know where that comes from. What does Sharpton do? Would somebody point out one similarity between Al Sharpton and Sarah Palin? Where is the Tawana Brawley in Sarah Palin’s life? Where is that incident? Where are all the megaphone-lead rallies and protests? Where are those things? Where is the complement to the National Action Network and its annual convention in whatever else?

Where is this? Where are the lawsuits that Sharpton files against people? Well, they claim that she’s playing her cards. Where is her tax cheating, for example? Who is Sarah Palin shaking down? I mean, if we’re gonna start making these comparisons… (interruption) What was it you just shouted at me, H.R.? Well, that’s why they say she’s portraying herself as a victim because she’s firing back. They are saying that she should just shut up. In the aftermath of being blamed for this Arizona thing, she should have just shut up. The fact that she responded and reacted to it means that she’s feeling sorry for herself and is portraying herself as a victim — and that’s something that the left does: Portray themselves as victims.

She shoulda just been quiet and let the story ride itself out and let it go away and so forth as it would have. I used to think that a lot of this was just fear-based. (sigh) I’ve really had a tough time understanding this. To be honest, folks, I’ve had a tough time. I’m still not sure. I’m wondering if some of this is not rooted in the fear that our “conservative intellectuals” have that our current crop of Republican presidential hopefuls is kind of weak; and that, therefore, she may be the most popular among ‘em. But it’s like I told you: I love telling this story. A couple friends of mine who had recently met Palin — I’ve never met her. I’ve spoken to her on the phone once when we interviewed her for Limbaugh Letter, the newsletter when she had her book out.

Other than that I’d never talked to her. I’ve never met her. She did tell a funny story when I did interview her. She said that I met her father out in Palm Springs at one of the first two Bob Hope Chrysler Classic golf tournaments I played in as an amateur that some guy came up and asked me to sign a copy of my book for his daughter. Well, it turned out to be her dad getting the book signed for her and that she has that book in her office or her library in her home in Alaska. That’s the extent. I don’t know her. I’ve never spent any time with her.

But these people that I know here had spent an evening with her, and couple days later I met them for dinner — and, folks, these are rock-ribbed conservatives, huge donors and fundraisers, Reaganites. Their pedigree is unquestionable, and they said to me, “You know, dear, we met Sarah Palin. I think you would agree, dear, she just doesn’t have the heft. She’s much prettier in person than even on TV — you can’t escape noticing that — but, I don’t know. I think she’s just not presidential. Do you think, dear?” And, you know, I recalled what the circumstance was here. This is not a place to start an argument. I didn’t care to, didn’t want to spend that kind of time there.

I said, “Yeah, you know what? Give me four more years of Obama, instead of Palin.”

“W-w-what? What do you mean by that, dear?”

“Well, Sarah Palin is so damn embarrassing, I don’t know how I could vote for her. I might not even be able to say I’m a Republican if she gets the nomination!”

“Um, I’m not quite following you, dear.”

“Well, she’s so embarrassing, I guess if it’s Sarah Palin or Obama? Hell, give me Obama!” I finally said, “Look, I don’t understand all this. THE PROBLEM IS OBAMA! The Democrat Party is destroying the freaking country — sorry to yell here — and we’re sitting here sniping over Sarah Palin? I’d vote for Elmer Fudd if the Republicans nominated him, if Obama’s the Democrat.” So obviously there are elements of this that are personal that I don’t understand. Look, I could understand not wanting her to be the nominee, I can understand thinking there’s somebody better, but this? There’s an all-out assault on her by our guys that puzzles me — and now this latest to say that she’s Al Sharpton? Our version of Al Sharpton in Alaska?

So you guys gotta help me out out there. Somebody’s gonna have to explain this to me because it makes no sense. You know, I’m totally immersed in logic and common sense, and some of this doesn’t register that way for me. I don’t get it. I can think of — I’m not going to mention any names here — the Republican field, what is it, nine or ten people that are said to be interested in it. There are four or five of them that can’t hold a candle to her, as far as I’m concerned. But these guys don’t think there’s one. So I’m thinking: What did she do to them? Does she embarrass them? (interruption) Okay. (interruption) If she does embarrass them, what? (interruption) Okay, well, of course the liberals are gonna say she’s stupid. That’s enough for us to say, “Okay, we don’t want her,” ’cause the liberals are rejecting her so we’ve gotta dump her? Okay.

All right. Fine. Fine. Well, anybody else got any ideas, I’m open to ‘em. [...]

What Rush doesn’t get is that Republicans used Palin to get a win in 2010, but now that it’s time to think about nominating a presidential contender she’s outlived her usefulness, because the firmly believe she simply cannot win. But Rush’s blindness about Sarah Palin and her inability to beat Pres. Obama does point to something else. It could be that the Missouri-born blowhard simply doesn’t understand how anyone could vote for a black man.

The problem isn’t Sarah Palin. It’s today’s Republican Party.

[...] As long as she was useful prior to the midterms, the institutions, magazines, and leaders of the movement not only tolerated her, but actively promoted her and gave her typically glowing coverage. Those that couldn’t bring themselves to praise her went out of their way not to criticize her. Now that Palin may represent a political threat to Republican chances of regaining the White House, they are suddenly very concerned about her impact on the quality of conservative argument. Their concern would be interesting if it weren’t so belated and narrowly focused on Palin. When Moynihan made that statement about Republicans 30 years ago, it was true. Thirty years later, the label “party of ideas” has simply become another slogan that Republicans trot out in lieu of any policy ideas. – Palin and the “Party of Ideas”

The reason Rush Limbaugh doesn’t understand it all is because Palin’s ideology fits his and that means she’s a viable candidate for Republicans, which is Mr. Limbaugh’s world means she can automatically beat Obama.

Read full story · Comments { 5 }

Trumka Thanks Walker, Republicans Reeling

“We probably should have invited him here today to receive the Mobilizer of the Year Award.”Richard Trumka

Today on Rush Limbaugh’s radio show he admitted Republicans lost the “headline war” in Wisconsin. That’s an understatement.

Greg Sargent writes that a recent poll reveals majorities support two Republican senators, Dan Kapanke and Randy Hopper, being recalled.

Republican overreach and bad faith has also resulted in huge fundraising for the Left, including MoveOn.org, which raised $350,000, which makes the total for recall $850,000. From Politico:

Combined with last night’s take, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee and Democracy for America have raised $750,000 since the standoff in Wisconsin began for a television campaign against GOP state senators facing recall elections.

“After what they pulled last night, these Republican senators are toast. The energy on the ground is higher than it’s ever been — and our ads are providing the air cover, making clear to local Wisconsinites that the Republican class warfare on behalf of big corporations against working families has got to end,” said PCCC’s Adam Green. DFA’s Charles Chamberlain said “Republicans have awoken a sleeping giant.”

Last night on Sean Hannity’s fact free Fox show, Ann Coulter had him sputtering to get a word in edge wise as she eviscerated Republicans in Wisconsin, particularly Scott Walker. Coulter said that before Walker got punk’d in the Koch call she’s pegged him for vice presidential material, but not anymore.

Then Coulter practically screamed, If this was Chris Christie he’d be on the air every night! There’s no doubt about it.

I’d like to see a debate between Christie and Trumka. Perhaps we could even get Michael “Let’s get ready to rumble” Buffer to call it to order.

RICHARD TRUMKA: Of course, but you have to have quality employees.

Take John Kasich. He says everybody has to share. When he came in, he gave his senior staff a 30 percent increase in wages, and then he turns around to public employees and says, now, I want to strip you, not only of the pensions you have been promised and the health care that you have been promised, but I want to take away your ability to negotiate for those.

Look, in a modern society, in a global economy, the companies that succeed are the companies that sit down with their employees, and they say, we have a problem. Let’s solve it. The old way of doing things, the Kasich way, the Walker way, is saying, employees, you have nothing to offer. Shut up and sit down and accept what we give you.

And the last point I would make about that, Judy, is that, remember something. Public employees are taxpayers as well.

(via PBS)

Read full story · Comments { 15 }

Fox News Suspends Newt & Some Guy Named Rick

Fox News suspends the contracts of political contributors Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum because both have demonstrated that they are seriously considering running for president. A Fox News official says the channel will take the same action against Mike Huckabee and Sarah Palin if they get closer to jumping into the race.Fox News pulls Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum off the air because of their interest in running for president

In a scramble to look legitimate, Fox News sends a shot over Sarah Palin’s bow, hoping to land a little spray in Huckland as well, by targeting the wannabe boys.

Mr. Santorum is the dumbest Republican on the planet. He hasn’t a chance in hell at the Republican nomination, so his decision to forego financial pluses of being a Fox contributor makes no sense, though it does prove the oversize ego and delusions of grandeur of this particular right-winger.

Former Speaker Newt Gingrich doesn’t need the cash and has been gnashing at the bit to run for president for a long time. He’s the first to announce an exploratory committee that he’s exploring his wannabe-ness.

Santorum and Gingrich have until May 1st to make a definitive decision.

Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee seem to be waiting each other out, though it just may end up that neither runs, with Huckabee clearly is testing things out with his book tour. Sarah’s trip to India is supposed to make her look smarter on foreign policy, which is impossible to do, because everything she thinks, says or reacts to on the national security scene is driven by ideology not facts or listening to experts.

More from the LA Times:

Fox News still has two other potential White House contenders on the payroll: former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee.

“As soon as each of them shows some serious intention to form an exploratory committee, we would take the same action,” Brandi said. “Huckabee is on a book tour, so I think his present intention is to sell books.”

As for Palin, “She hasn’t yet shown a serious intention to form an exploratory committee.”

As people who follow me on Twitter know, yesterday Donald Trump was on with Rush Limbaugh making his economic case. He railed against U.S. – China trade policy and said if the Chinese don’t change he’d slap a 25% tax on their imports. One thing I didn’t tweet that Trump said is that he contacted the White House, a very high up person in the Administration he says, and offered to donate $50-100 million to build a ballroom to host visiting dignitaries, including constructing the building through committee approved by the White House. Mr. Trump is incensed by the big tent events, which he believes aren’t fitting “our great country” or the visiting heads of state American presidents host. The White House listened, but never responded to him again.

Trump’s economic vision is backed by a lot more than anything Mitt Romney has, with the added benefit that Mr. Trump doesn’t have the RomneyCare albatross around his neck. How Mr. Romney is going to wiggle his ways through the primaries with his Massachusetts health care concoction not costing him will be the most fun to watch.

In another Fox News story that I cannot resist mentioning, this video went viral on Facebook and reveals Bill O’Reilly’s “The Factor” using footage outside of Wisconsin to smear protesters inside that state. Palm trees in Wisconsin?

So, as much as Fox News is attempting to look legit by suspending contributors who might be presidential candidates, showing palm trees in Wisconsin blows their propaganda cover wide open.

Read full story · Comments { 6 }

When Obama Loyalists Blow

A former community organizer in Chicago, Obama proposed a 50-percent cut to a $700-million community-service block grant program. A former lawyer who touted his work to improve living conditions for the poor, Obama proposed a sharp cut in energy assistance for low-income families. A graduate-school alumnus who only recently, and quite publicly, was able to pay off his debts, Obama proposed refiguring loan programs so that students would accrue interest even while they’re enrolled. – Sam Stein

Barack Obama still hasn’t learned you get no credit for cutting off your own. As a nod to the Republicans, he’s making a statement. Trust me, they could not care less.

Andrew Sullivan is not pleased with Pres. Obama’s budget, his caterwauling proving my point. After weeks away due to ill health, he’s back and begins by unloading on Obama:

They have to lead, because this president is too weak, too cautious, too beholden to politics over policy to lead. In this budget, in his refusal to do anything concrete to tackle the looming entitlement debt, in his failure to address the generational injustice, in his blithe indifference to the increasing danger of default, he has betrayed those of us who took him to be a serious president prepared to put the good of the country before his short term political interests. Like his State of the Union, this budget is good short term politics but such a massive pile of fiscal bullshit it makes it perfectly clear that Obama is kicking this vital issue down the road.

To all those under 30 who worked so hard to get this man elected, know this: he just screwed you over. He thinks you’re fools. Either the US will go into default because of Obama’s cowardice, or you will be paying far far more for far far less because this president has no courage when it counts. He let you down. On the critical issue of America’s fiscal crisis, he represents no hope and no change. Just the same old Washington politics he once promised to end.

The light has finally dawned. “Hope” and “change” were marketing messaging. Ah, got it. Mr. Sullivan is actually channeling his own grief even if he’s well beyond the under 30 crowd. It has him looking to Mitch Daniels for fiscal salvation, who just had a rhetorical collision with Rush Limbaugh.

Pres. Obama is just another elite corporate politician doing what every other president would do in order to live to fight another day. He’s going to let the opposition propose the devastating cuts to people’s favorite programs, while preemptively cutting some of his own to have as a talking point.

POLITICO proves why Obama did what he did. The first ones up on their “loser” list is “the liberal base.”

Pres. Obama cannot be taken seriously on anything having to do with fiscal reality, because his craven political cowardice pushed him to sign on to extending tax cuts for the top 2% in December, which any sane person would know is going to make the deficit worse not better, while not solving anything. The Wall Street Journal laid the budget out on Monday. Both parties are laser focused on discretionary programs, while placing their fingers in their ears and singing La La La La La on entitlement challenges.

It’s all so predictably absurd; politics as usual on steroids.

Everyone is running around saying how hard this is, but only because these knuckleheads are making it more difficult than it is.

Yes, I know, it’s argued that Obama couldn’t have gotten anything more. I don’t really want to revisit all of that; my point here is simply that everyone is drawing the wrong lesson. Fiscal policy didn’t fail; it wasn’t tried. – Paul Krugman

Raise the fricking cap on Social Security taxed income; $106,000 in today’s world of super wealthy makes no sense. That would be enough. But taxes should also be realigned so that multi-millionaires have a higher bracket, with the super wealthy another one above it. Then get out of Iraq, and immediately bring troops home from areas where we no longer need to be, which includes Afghanistan, because a 2014 date is patently absurd.

Pres. Obama was never going to stand up against his base on entitlements in this budget, particularly on Social Security. He wouldn’t get reelected if he did.

It does no good for Obama to keep Mr. Sullivan if he loses his base. The changes to Social Security are much more likely to come in Obama’s second term, which has always been the play, even if raising the cap would solve a lot more problems than tinkering with the model would make. Once you open that door it stays open.

Read full story · Comments { 33 }

Egyptian Revolution Inspired by Liberalism

“He gave me a lesson in democracy and said: ‘We see the democracy the United States spearheaded in Iran and with Hamas, in Gaza, and that’s the fate of the Middle East,’” Ben-Eliezer said. “‘They may be talking about democracy but they don’t know what they’re talking about and the result will be extremism and radical Islam,’” he quoted Mubarak as saying. — Mubarak slammed U.S. in phone call with Israeli MK before resignation

Conservatism didn’t inspire the Egyptian people, it was liberalism.

Control is the central tenet of conservatism. That’s what the Egyptian people were fighting against, the control of the regime in all facets of their lives.

Control is also what 20th century leaders and thinkers desperately try to hold on to in the wake of a multi-platform media explosion, which obliterates the notion you can control anything anymore.

What Mubarak warns against may happen, but eventually liberalism will win there too, even if in the confines of a religious society, a conservative construct forwarded from ancient times.

Algeria is shutting down the internet and Facebook as protests mount.

Freedom cannot be stopped. It can only be delayed.

Liberalism is what broke out in Iran during the Green uprising.

Liberalism is what kept France from accepting the burqa.

Liberalism is what sparked the uprising in Tunisia. The basic human desire to live life freely is something worth dying for, because without freedom there is no essential life.

Liberalism is what inspired Egyptians to rise up to demand freedom.

In fact, freedom itself is a liberal notion.

Women in the Mideast demanding respect are invoking liberalism, while the conservatives who prop up old rules want to inhibit their freedoms.

Gays fighting to stay alive in Muslim countries are fighting conservatism. In America, they’re fighting for the basic equality of life, which conservatives believe should be denied.

Women in America are fighting to be as free as men.

Conservatives and leading Republicans like Sarah Palin are fighting to stop that basic human right from manifesting against the basic principles of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Conservatives in both political parties have made religion more important than the individual life being lived. Religion itself a conservative notion, which aims to control, unless you get beyond the organized into the self-spiritualized experience, which conservative society mocks.

Wherever liberalism is missing there is angst, anger and unrest.

Liberalism reaches out in support of our fellow man and woman, while conservatism demands up from your own boot straps mentality in a system rigged against the poor.

The Taliban and the Islamic extremists we’re fighting are all conservatives. Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria and many other countries are all conservative nations fighting against the freedom of people.

Conservatives, in whatever party they serve, wanted to gain control of Iraq, so they voted for preemptive war.

Conservatives wanted to control Palestinians, so they forced an election that delivered Hamas.

Conservatism is dry, infertile, cruel and deadly. It is about control and order versus freedom.

Liberalism is ripe, generous, infinite and hopeful. It is fundamentally uncontrollable, which is why people fear it. Like freedom itself, it is inexhaustible.

Everywhere in the world where people are rising up on the cry of freedom it’s because of liberalism.

Conservatism is bondage to rules, which in our country is well represented in Strom Thurmond, as well as Trent Lott, who bolted the Democratic Party to eventually form the Republican Party’s Southern wing, because they couldn’t stomach integration that was being heralded by the new liberalism of the ’60s.

Conservatism shuts off, where liberalism opens up.

Imagine if Iran’s mullahs were liberal.

Imagine if PM Netanyahu was a liberal.

Imagine if Democrats who voted for the Iraq war were guided by liberalism instead of 20th century conservative militarism.

When a small group of freshman Republicans voted against several tenets of the Patriot Act recently, they were joining liberals at a point of common ground, bipartisanship meeting organically. Liberals believing that government has no right to infringe on personal privacy without reason, with a few new conservatives agreeing because they think government’s role should be restricted so that it doesn’t impede on the individual.

Could this finally be a place to reboot, a new political beginning?

Then the Republican establishment rose up, including Rush Limbaugh, to say these conservative freshman were misinformed. The Right’s elite stepping in to curtail the freshman’s freedom to vote in favor of the people over government intervention. Their basic reasoning being that there is much to fear in the world, which makes impeding the American citizen’s freedoms worthwhile. Republican conservatism once again robbing people out of fear, which they also utilize on immigration.

“Compassionate conservatism” is finally understood to be the oxymoron it always was.

Pres. Obama is the latest elite politician to err on the side of conservatism over liberalism under his fear and ignorance moored to marketing more than truth. Because without liberalism Barack Obama would not be president. His conservatism evident amidst the Egyptian revolution, because he didn’t trust the Egyptian people’s freedom cry and know instinctively that they were in the right, no matter the outcome.

The Iranian Green uprising teaching a lesson Pres. Obama and his administration didn’t learn. The thirst for freedom will eventually win out.

If Barack Obama trusted liberalism, which he never has, he would have known what to do on Egypt from the start. If Sect. Clinton had trusted liberalism she would never have uttered that Mubarak’s government was “stable.” And V.P. Joe Biden would never have embarrassed himself by stating Mubarak shouldn’t step down or that he wasn’t a dictator. In the Administration’s struggles to get Egypt right the answer was always right in front of them, but they simply couldn’t see it and definitely didn’t trust it. It’s not just their failure, however, it’s the failure of a world coming out of the 20th century where control was policy.

Freedom cannot flourish in the confines of conservatism.

When Ronald Reagan shouted to Mikhail Gorbachev to “tear down this wall,” it was a liberal demand.

When a conservative is crying out for freedom’s justice he’s simply pleading for a release from bondage that conservatism itself has imposed.

There’s no denying it.

Wherever freedom is breaking out, demanded or being defended, liberalism is at its heart.

Read full story · Comments { 27 }

Egypt Sends Glenn Beck Squealing about a Caliphate

Who’s organizing these riots?

What role are Marxists playing?

What are the causes?

Glenn Beck proves fear really is a product of ignorance.

Beck is very afraid of The Arab, whom he equates to The Terrorist. Beck is also just another fundamentalist believing his religion is perfect, while Islam is unholy. It doesn’t appear he’s ever seen Al Jazeera English and evidently can’t be bothered with following their excellent live blogging on the story either.

Not a theory of a caliphate, a fact!, Glenn Beck rails. Here’s some actual information on the Muslim Brotherhood from the Council on Foreign Relations. The Muslim Brotherhood doesn’t even have a majority in Egypt, but Beck can’t be bothered with facts.

Rush Limbaugh and his “Imam Obama” rants add another angle to the continual demonizing of Pres. Obama. The Egypt situation is filled with opportunities for the Right to channel crazy and they’re doing it with glee.

The collective cacophony of the Right on the subject of Egypt has been deafening and dumb.

The Jewish revolution produced by the Egyptian revolt isn’t on their radar.

After the anti-regime protests in Egypt, whenever Mubarak steps down, the world will change and our relationships in the Middle East will, too. The 20th century paradigms have been smashed to smithereens. Whether Americans are ready to gear up and accept reality and our new challenges or if Frank Gaffney talking points and scare tactics will infect the 2012 presidential election season is a real choice.

You can bet foreign policy will be a central focus, even as the economy remains the biggest issue. It bodes ill for people short on national security credentials, which I believe will be important in the general election and may even be the biggest reason Sarah Palin won’t cut it, though will that matter to primary voters? Pres. Obama is in a much better position, but a lot depends on how Egypt shakes out. Whether conservative primary voters accept and appreciate the political pitfalls of putting up someone inexperienced on foreign policy matters will begin to play out soon.

Is Glenn Beck talking to Republican primary voters and are they listening? We know they’re listening to Rush & Co. Does the Right really believe the U.S. is in danger if we respect what the Egyptian people want for themselves?

If you want to know the road the Right is taking on Egypt and how they plan to capitalize on it by further demonizing Pres. Obama, see their current “Obama is Losing Egypt” campaign.

Read full story · Comments { 26 }

This Week in Crazy: Beck’s New Jew Woes, Graham Uses Our Troops’ Name to Cut SS, & More

TM NOTE: Texan4Hillary offers his perspective as a movement progressive activist.

This week in crazy is full of stuff.

As folks in the media look at Glenn Beck and his comments post Rep. Giffords, one popped up that is really nuts. Ok, say it with me: The Jews did NOT kill Jesus. Got it Beck? Here is what he said on air back in July that is now making the rounds:

This is kind of complex, because Jesus did identify with the victims. But Jesus wasn’t a victim, he was a conqueror. Jesus conquered death. He chose to give his life. Jesus didn’t come back from the dead and make the Jews pay for what they did. That would have been an abomination.

Oy vay.

Four-hundred rabbis, infuriated with Beck’s frequent use of the term “Nazi” and constant twisting of Holocaust survivor Soros’ experiences during the war, went right for the Right’s throat. They took out a ad in the Wall Street Journal blasting Fox News, Beck and Ailes for allowing such offensive crap to go on the air. See their awesome ad here.

Rush is blowing heavy as usual and his words sent one of his listeners to allegedly do something potentially criminal.

Last week, California State Sen. Leland Yee (D) called on right-wing hate radio host Rush Limbaugh to apologize for mocking Chinese President Hu Jintao and the Chinese language by speaking gibberish “ching chong chang” Chinese on his radio program. Yee, who is Chinese-American and chairs the state Senate Select Committee on Asian and Pacific Islander Affairs, said Limbaugh owes the Chinese-American community an apology for his “pointless and ugly offense.” Naturally, Limbaugh did not apologize, and instead railed against Yee the following day on his radio, calling him out repeatedly by name.

Yee’s call for civility did not sit well with one Limbaugh fan, who responded by sending several racist death threats to Yee’s office this week. “Rush Limbaugh will kick your chink ass and expose you for the fool you are,” the faxes read, threatening him with “death”...

Blood libel I say.

We get news that the GOP in the Senate has slotted newly elected Tea Party nut Senator Lee of Utah to sit on the Judiciary Committee. One problem: Senator Lee thinks that child labor laws, the FDA, FEMA, food stamps, Medicare and Medicaid are unconstitutional. He will be a real help in the days ahead.

In Colorado the newly elected Right wing state house is trying to kill free school breakfasts and lunches for kids. In committee they succeeded in killing the funding, but the Dem guv plans to fight against the move. Here is what one of the key GOP state senators had to say. The move would make poor kids pay 30 cents per meal and save 100,000 bucks since the federal government subsidizes most of it anyway. But no. Starve these kids we must! After all those poverty ridden shlubs do not work hard to feed their kids right?

Denver Post:

“As a family guy myself with children and grandchildren, I take a very strong responsibility to earn money to feed my own family,” said Sen. Kent Lambert, R-Colorado Springs, who voted against the request. He said charities could step up if some families have difficulty paying the fees.

“I think if that need is out there, there are charitable groups that are out there that go way, way beyond that to take care of families in need,” Lambert said. “Out here in El Paso County, for example, we have churches all over the place.”

Um, yeah buddy. One last one. Senator Graham of South Carolina has been inspired by the bravery of our troops dying every day overseas. So inspired is he that he is using their name to destroy Social Security.

Link here.

GRAHAM: I would give anything if the United States Congress for one month could act in accordance with the way our men and women are serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. We know what to do on Social Security. I’ve put on the table adjusting the age from 67 to 69. …

…by introducing legislation soon that would adjust the age the way Reagan and O’Neill did — 67 to 69 — over decades and a reasonable means test on benefits as a down payment to getting our entitlement house in order. And they can run all the commercials they want. It does not matter…I know what I need to do to help my country. And these young men and women know what they need to do in Iraq to make us safe.

Why is Graham using the troops name to defend his proposal? Because progressives are running ads like this against him:

That’s your week in crazy.

Read full story · Comments { 6 }

EGYPT: Al Jazeera and White House Mixed Messaging in the Age of Wikileak Cables, Twitter and Facebook

**UPDATES BELOW**

This has been an extraordinary week. What follows is a remarkable story I’ve done my best to unpack and requires a lot of investment on your part. I don’t claim this is perfectly packaged, but I’ve done the very best I can on a story I think is historic, including news late last night that Egypt had left the Internet, as well as flummoxing for U.S. leaders.

The cables, which cover the first year of the Obama presidency, leave little doubt about how valuable an ally Mr. Mubarak has been, detailing how he backed the United States in its confrontation with Iran, played mediator between Israel and the Palestinians and supported Iraq’s fledgling government, despite his opposition to the American-led war. Privately, Ambassador Scobey pressed Egypt’s interior minister to free three bloggers, as well as a Coptic priest who performed a wedding for a Christian convert, according to one of her cables to Washington. She also asked that three American pro-democracy groups be granted formal permission to operate in the country, a request the Egyptians rejected. – Cables Show Delicate U.S. Dealings With Egypt’s Leaders

The Obama administration needs to up its game. Al Jazeera is watching and broadcasting to a region that is convulsing with freedom pangs in the era of transformative media access through Wikileaks, Twitter and Facebook that empowers people held in bondage by brutal regimes, which we often bankroll, including $1.3 billion in military aid to Egypt yearly.

When Al Jazeera English became available in parts of the U.S., like the Beltway, it was a seminal event as far as I am concerned. It’s the most important channel not enough people are watching, a tiny part of that because it’s not available everywhere. It’s the first successful channel to connect the Arab world while blasting what is happening into America, which the U.S. media ignores at our peril and they do so because it doesn’t pay and we’re such a navel gazing country most don’t understand the repercussions of our own ignorance. It’s also why too many Americans accept Beck-Palin-Rush stereotypes of the people whose countries we are occupying and the regimes we continue to bolster, even against what the people want.

The first post I did on the beginnings of the Arab eruptions this week, on Monday, was centered around Al Jazeera’s prominent role in the Palestine Papers. This story revealed Sect. Clinton allegedly saying the Palestinians are “always in a chapter of a Greek tragedy,” with Al Jazeera reporting the U.S. as anything but an honest broker. Watching the Palestine Papers unfold on Al Jazeera English, as well as on Twitter, was stunning, all of which came on the wave of what happened in Tunisia.

Today, Friday, the New York Times writes in more detail what I began covering on Monday, which is that Al Jazeera is at the center this story as much as anything else. (My tweet below mirrors what others tweeting that day were also witnessing on Al Jazeera English, which the New York Times confirms today, the “finally” meaning they finally woke up.)

On Tuesday afternoon, as the street protests in Egypt were heating up, Al Jazeera was uncharacteristically slow to report them, airing a culture documentary, a sports show and more of its “Palestine Papers” coverage of the leaked documents.

Many Egyptians felt betrayed, and Facebook and Twitter were full of rumors about a deal between Qatar — the Persian Gulf emirate whose emir, Sheik Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani, founded Al Jazeera in 1996 — and President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, who visited the emir in Doha last month. Within a day, Al Jazeera was reporting from the streets in Cairo in its usual manic style.

Al Jazeera’s freewheeling broadcasts have long made it the bête noire of Arab governments, and in some earlier instances they have succeeded in reining it in.

In 2007, the channel received orders to soften its blunt coverage of Saudi Arabia after Qatar and the Saudis mended a smoldering political feud. That remains a weak point for Al Jazeera — as for most of the pan-Arab press, which is largely owned by Saudi Arabia.

Yet for all its flaws, Al Jazeera still operates with less constraint than almost any other Arab outlet, and remains the most popular channel in the region. To many Arabs, Al Jazeera’s recent exposé on the Palestinian Authority documents — sometimes called “Pali-leaks” — is of a piece with its reporting on protests against autocratic Arab regimes.

The story continues to widen with Vice Pres. Joe Biden’s unhelpful statements to PBS last night, the latest foreign policy fodder to be subject to Twitter and Facebook responses and relays that ricochet.

V.P. Biden with Jim Lehrer last night on PBS (video below loads slowly):


JIM LEHRER: Has the time come for President Mubarak of Egypt to go, to stand aside?

JOE BIDEN: No, I think the time has come for President Mubarak to begin to move in the direction that — to be more responsive to some of the needs of the people out there. These are — a lot of the people out there protesting are middle-class folks who are looking for a little more access and a little more opportunity.

And the two things we have been saying here, Jim, is that violence isn’t appropriate and people have a right to protest. And so — and we think that — I hope Mubarak, President Mubarak, will — is going to respond to some of the legitimate concerns that are being raised.

JIM LEHRER: You know President Mubarak.

JOE BIDEN: I know him fairly well.

JIM LEHRER: Have you talked to him about this?

JOE BIDEN: I haven’t talked to him in the last three days.

I — last time I — actually, I haven’t talked to him in about a month. But I speak to him fairly regularly. And I think that, you know, there’s a lot going on across that part of the continent, from Tunisia into — all the way to Pakistan, actually. And there’s — a lot of these countries are beginning to sort of take stock of where they are and what they have to do. [...] [...]

JIM LEHRER: The word — the word to describe the leadership of Mubarak and Egypt and also in Tunisia before was dictator. Should Mubarak be seen as a dictator?

JOE BIDEN: Look, Mubarak has been an ally of ours in a number of things and he’s been very responsible on, relative to geopolitical interests in the region: Middle East peace efforts, the actions Egypt has taken relative to normalizing the relationship with Israel.

And I think that it would be — I would not refer to him as a dictator.

When asked about Pres. Mubarak being a “dictator,” Biden’s first response even in the face of what has been covered on Al Jazeera just this week, was to talk in terms of our “geopolitical” relationship that in the 20th century was the way people talked about foreign policy, before it became as multidimensional as it is today.

I also cannot figure out why, considering Biden knows Mubarak “fairly well” and speaks to him “fairly regularly,” he hasn’t spoken to him “the last three days.”

The State Dept.’s spokesman P.J. Crowley went down a similar road on Al Jazeera, as I wrote about yesterday and it was ugly.

Blake Hounshell posted the Administration’s statements on Egypt late last night, thinking on similar lines as myself, without the narrative I’m constructing.

Others may disagree with me, but all of this combined with the Wikileaks cables on Egypt that has us saying one thing privately about human rights, then in public making statements that might aid Mubarak while Al Jazeera is broadcasting reality, add in the Palestine Papers revelations, makes for potentially vulnerable geopolitical ramifications Biden seems not to have considered.

There is no way we can survive humiliation through our current 20th century thinking in a world now connected via Twitter and Facebook and with Al Jazeera beaming into homes across the Arab world, especially now that we can also see what the Arab world is seeing.

The contagion since Tunisia is proof, regardless of whether “governments topple,” something Biden at least had the humility to admit he could be misjudging.

I have no opinion on this, because I don’t think anyone knows what the new media platforms working in synchronicity with the people driving them at once can achieve today.

But it’s simply none of the U.S.’s business to declare whether Mubarak is a “dictator,” a nice word for what he’s leveled on his own people, or say he should or should not step down. Not even our financial investment or geopolitical alliance gives us this right and that we still think it does is one of the problems of our foreign policy in this converging new media century.

After Sect. Clinton’s very first meeting with Pres. Mubarak at the Red Sea resort of Sharm el Sheik, March 2009, which the cables at the top of this post reference, Clinton was reported to have said something much more tuned in than what she initially said this week. Back in 2009, on a question on Egypt’s human rights, Hillary responded as follows, emphasis added.

“We hope that it will be taken in the spirit in which it is offered, that we all have room for improvement,” Mrs. Clinton said, adding that Mr. Mubarak and his wife, Suzanne, were friends of her family, and that it was up to the Egyptian people to decide the president’s future.

Yet her first response on Tuesday, like Biden ridiculously stating Mubarak wasn’t a “dictator,” however his splitting hairs definition defines it, was to bolster the Egyptian government and describe it as “stable.”

Clinton’s first statement looked even worse when ElBaradei landed in Cairo yesterday, with CNN’s Ben Wedeman tweeting his message from Cairo: ElBaradei at airport says the point of no return has been reached must be peaceful change govt must stop using violence.

Much earlier Thursday, so it was leaked on Wednesday at some point, it was reported that an anonymous administration official was saying Pres. Obama was “poised to intensity U.S. criticism of Egypt’s Mubarak.”

So what to make of V.P. Joe Biden’s interview on PBS Thursday night? From where I sit it was a serious and embarrassing misstep from a foreign policy veteran, but also the Administration, who hasn’t caught up with how world events are zipping around the globe on multiple and converging media platforms that everyone can see.

Pres. Obama didn’t address what’s been happening in Egypt publicly until yesterday. That may have been good for his time table, but it was woefully late considering Tunisia and what happened this week.

Once upon a time not so long ago, in a century that now seems so far away where communication, media and social platforms are concerned, the Obama administration might have caught a break.

It’s been the week that Al Jazeera has been waiting for, coming on the heels of Wikileaks, as Twitter and Facebook continue to rock the globe, with Pres. Obama and his administration still not quite getting what they’re up against, the most challenging of which may yet be to come.

___________________________________________________________



Pres. Obama talked about the people first, stressing the importance that there be no violence. He stressed the important relationship with Egypt, stating reforms must be made, which he relayed to Mubarak. Backs Mubarak, but strongly leans towards the people and once again reiterated that it’s up to the people of Egypt. Importantly, Pres. Obama finished by saying we’ll know more in the morning. It clearly stated to me that after the Egyptian people digest what Mubarak said we’ll see if the protests continue and what the govt. does about opening up the communication gateway. Pres. Obama transmitting the real dangers in the situation and walking very, very carefully, as he should. This is a long play not a one act. It will be developing for a while.

UPDATE 6:30 pm: Waiting for Pres. Obama to speak. Via Chuck Todd he finally spoke to Pres. Mubarak and the conversation reportedly lasted 30 minutes.



UPDATE 5:19 pm: Mubarak saying demonstrations representative of “freedoms” offered by Egypt through his presidency. Will “always adhere to the right of freedom…” Mubarak then sacks his whole government, but he continues on. Outside the protesters continued to yell “Down, down with Mubarak.” Via CNN’s Nic Robertson, chants “We don’t want him” rising. Mubarak obviously has gotten assurances from Egyptian military. We’ll see what develops when the Internet and communications are switched on again. Nothing in Egypt will ever be the same.

UPDATE 3:15 pm: Gibbs after being challenged about his words (3:54 pm): “I’m not tempering one word or one syllable of one word. .. we’ve reached a point where grievances have to be addressed.” Robert Gibbs: “We will be reviewing our assistance posture based on events now and in the coming days.” Chip Reid: Has he tried to reach Mubarak? Gibbs: “Not that I’m aware of.” MESSAGE SENT TO EGYPT. Why isn’t the President standing where you’re standing? Not much to say on that one, so Gibbs vamps. At top, Gibbs invoked “legitimate grievances” people have must be addressed by Egyptian gov. “immediately,” emphasizes it, including communication. Gibbs rightly points story back to the Egyptian people, “this will be solved by the Egyptian people.” Again stresses “grievances” re Mubarak. Never been a fan of Gibbs, but this is one of his best moments and it comes at a critical time for Pres. Obama & the US govt. Chuck Todd: Has anyone condemned house arrest of ElBaradei? Gibbs: “a Nobel Laureate… type of activities gov has responsibility to change.”


UPDATE 2:55 pm: picture via Mike Memoli.

UPDATE 12:56 pm: STILL WAITING FOR MUBARACK TO SPEAK. Marc Lynch on Twitter: Mubarak’s silence is increasingly becoming the story. Egyptians continue to defy curfew.

UPDATE 12:14 pm: Sect. Hillary Clinton just spoke condemning internet shutdown and urging govt to address “grievances” of people. She made a shift towards people (finally), putting them before government. The trouble is that though the US is powerless here, our govt. props up Mubarak against the people’s will. A very sobering moment for the US.


Picture above is the NDP in flames. Egyptian’s National Museum is near.

UPDATE 11:26 pm: Pictures from AJE… Iconic imagery now. Huge plumes of deep black smoke rising from NDP (National Democratic Party) headquarters & complex of buildings, which is the ruling establishment of Mubarak, going back to ’80s.

BREAKING… MUBARAK TO SPEAK SOON. CURFEW NOW IN EFFECT… loud cries still being heard. People are not leaving the streets. Egyptian state media says Pres. Mubarak has ordered the Egyptian State Army on to the streets.

UPDATE 10:27 a.m.: Curfew now imposed in Egypt, which is 30 min. away.

UPDATE III: A very important point by media expert on Al Jazeera, Kevin Anderson, correctly reporting that in Egypt the “overlap betweeen internet activists and activists is almost complete. The activists in Egypt have long been using the internet.” Primarily from blogging, with Egyptian political bloggers well known.

“Egypt has enjoyed a long history of internet activism,” Kevin Anderson continues. “Now they have a very sophisticated way of not just using FB & Twitter… but also SMS and mobile networks, which have also been effective in this clampdown.”

UPDATE II: ElBaradei now under house arrest.

UPDATE: ElBaradei: “Egyptian government on last legs…”

ElBaradei has already criticised the US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, for describing the Egyptian government as stable and he stepped up his calls for the rest of the world to explicitly condemn Mubarak, who is a close ally of the US.

“The international community must understand we are being denied every human right day by day,” he said. “Egypt today is one big prison. If the international community does not speak out it will have a lot of implications. We are fighting for universal values here. If the west is not going to speak out now, then when?”

Read full story · Comments { 43 }

Eric Cantor Wants to Start Over On Health Care

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Rep. Cantor wouldn’t call the birthers and others questioning Obama’s citizenship as engaging in “crazy talk,” as David Gregory urged, but he did manage to laugh nervously like a little girl before replying. It’s really unseemly when a supposed “leader” won’t take to task his own lunatic fringe, because it makes him look weak and scared of them. But I guess since Rush Limbaugh is now leading the birther “crazy talk” Cantor can’t afford to take on the big man, because he can’t win.

The more Eric Cantor talks about health care the less sense he makes.

David Gregory easily took him down.

MR. GREGORY: All right, let, let’s, let’s move on to health care because House Republicans did repeal the president’s healthcare reform plan, but the real question is what Republicans are prepared to replace it with and whether you have a serious plan. Major Garrett in the National Journal reports this week the following about the speaker’s plan, Speaker Boehner: “The Boehner plan, according to the Congressional Budget Office, would add just three million Americans to the insurance rolls, leaving about 50 million still without coverage through 2019. CBO said that the proposal would reduce costs in the group-insurance market, which constitutes nearly 80 percent of private-sector premiums, by less than 3 percent. `If it’s all they do, it is not a serious effort,’ Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former CBO director and chief policy adviser for John McCain’s 2008 presidential campaign, said of the Boehner alternative. `You can’t just do that.’”

The truth is, Republicans do not have a serious alternative to covering more Americans, do they?

REP. CANTOR: I disagree with that, obviously, David. First of all, you know, we believe you can do better in health care. I mean, we want to try and address the situation so more folks can have coverage, can, can have the kind of care that they want.

MR. GREGORY: But that’s not what the Boehner plan does.

REP. CANTOR: Well, the…

MR. GREGORY: It’s not more folks being covered.

REP. CANTOR: Well, the–if you recall last session, we Republicans were given one shot; we didn’t have any open debate for both sides at all on the healthcare bill the way it was jammed through. The Boehner plan is just a starting point. You know, what we said when we went and voted to repeal Obamacare last week in Congress, what we said is we want our committees to begin a process of deliberations from both sides, open, honest debates, so the people can understand everything that’s being discussed. And we’re going to focus on patient-controlled health care. We’re going to focus on, first and foremost, bringing down costs and adding to people’s choices and flexibility.

MR. GREGORY: But, Leader, you’re talking about bringing down costs. If you were serious about this, why not negotiate with Democrats in areas where you could deliver Republican votes? There are currently efficiencies in the Obama healthcare bill that deal with penalties for hospitals if there are recurrent infections. There are efficiencies that do address cost, and they certainly address getting more people covered than any Republican plan you’re suggesting.

REP. CANTOR: David, the problem is if we’re all really desirous of trying to deal with people who are in need and want to improve the healthcare future for this country, you, you can’t start with a Washington-controlled system. That’s the structure of Obamacare. It’s broad, sweeping federal mandates imposing the kind of health care that people should have instead of allowing people to choose for themselves and allow for the flexibility and choice. That’s why we’re going to have an open process, invite the other side in to have debates. We have committed, in the Pledge to America, that we are going to finally see the institution work. Speaker Boehner’s always said that, that we’re going to actually have committees do their work, we’re going to have work on the floor. We’re not going to see an instance where you’re going to jam through a healthcare bill the way that Speaker Pelosi did.

MR. GREGORY: Right. Although isn’t that what you just did on the repeal?

REP. CANTOR: We, we–no. We pledged…

MR. GREGORY: How is that different than what you say the Democrats did?

REP. CANTOR: Because it was, it was a page and a half bill, David. It was a page…

MR. GREGORY: Yeah. Seven hours of debates. So there wasn’t, wasn’t a lot of room for a lot of negotiation.

…and if you think this is bad you ought to hear Mr. Cantor on Social Security.

Read full story · Comments { 8 }