TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Tag Archives | unions

V.P. Joe Biden Gives a Stemwinder After Blasting ‘Zero Credibility’ Republicans

Remember who we are…

From a whisper to a rallying cry, V.P. Joe Biden reveals how it’s done. Not because of just the words, but because you believe the man who’s saying it. He’s the exact vice president Barack Obama needs, providing the perfect emotional connection to issues, not just professorial meanderings on a theme.

GOP getting in way of change, Biden tells Democrats, teachers union

Paraphrasing President Franklin Roosevelt’s attacks on his Republican critics in the 1930s, Biden belittled House Speaker John Boehner, House Minority Leader Eric Cantor and Senate President Mitch McConnell as “a beautiful rhythm of obstructionists, Boehner, Cantor and Mitch.”

Biden accused Republicans of creating the very budget deficits that they campaign against, and of not understanding that their tax-cuts proposals and vow to kill health-care reform would make the budget situation worse.

“That’s what I find absolutely bizarre: Republicans moralizing about deficits. That’s like an arsonist moralizing about fire safety,” he said. “These guys have zero credibility.”

[...] Biden said Republicans had sold the public the message that teachers and their union are responsible for bad schools.

“Folks, this is one of the biggest scams in modern American history,” he said. “They’re using you to launch the most direct assault on labor, not just in my lifetime, but since the ’20s.”

Go get ‘em, Joe.

Video via Mark Halperin’s “Biden Indicts Every Republican Leader in America.”

Read full story · Comments { 12 }

OWS: The Connections are Wide and Deep

The video above is of Sgt. Shamar Thomas. It went viral and now has over 2 million hits. After Scott Olsen’s assault, it seems even more relevant.

Interestingly, Olsen is reportedly from Wisconsin, the state that Gov. Scott Walker ignited with his anti-democratic view of economic equality.

As a reminder, Pres. Obama and the Democrats did not mount any economic message for the 2010 midterms. Then after getting their… um.. hats handed to them in December, Pres. Obama made a deal with Republicans to extend the Bush tax cuts. Now that candidate Obama is on the campaign stump, however, he says he won’t extend them again.

Of course, now that Pres. Obama’s own political future is on the line he’s sounding like a class warrior who has religion.  One by one on cable, the talking heads proclaim he’s “back,” his message is winning, etc.  

It’s not hard to believe Pres. Obama’s populist message, conveniently timed and politically motivated, is winning. The message to back up the middle class and working stiffs, one that I’ve been drilling home for years, is always a winner.  It’s just unfortunate that Mr. Obama only finds it when his own fortunes need a lift.

It’s also why I laugh out loud when David Axelrod or team Obama go after Mitt Romney, making the argument that slick Mitt will say anything to get elected.  If that charge sounds familiar it should.  Yes, Mitt Romney is a Wall Street jackal.  Obama’s not in that league, but he doesn’t have any problem taking campaign contributions from those who are.  You decipher the difference.

Ronald Reagan started sapping the American dream in the 1980s, which lasted for 12 years. 

The Bush tax cuts and two wars off the books in the 2000s did the rest.  

When Pres. Obama came into office, the economic die was already cast.  

Unfortunately, Obama chose to hire Tim Geithner and Larry Summers, the latter the man who convinced Pres. Bill Clinton to dismantle Glass-Steagall, though when Clinton finally signed the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act, Congress had passed it with a veto proof majority.  An apology from Clinton is hardly enough, but you would have thought Barack Obama would have learned before entering office what these actions had wrought.  Instead, he doubled down on known economic quantities and friends of the establishment, moneyed class.  People who helped the economic crisis occur.

Elizabeth Warren offered Pres. Obama a glimmer of hope and a way out of the mess Geithner and Summers had made of his economic message.  Unfortunately, Tim Geithner had no intention of letting her gain power and Obama had no intention of using his presidential clout to make sure the woman who understood the financial plight of we the people had any.

From Confidence Men, the book that sent the White House into swift damage control, by Ron Suskind:

“… Only those in his inner circle at Treasury, though, can read what’s behind that expression: a string of private efforts across the past year to neutralize Warren. The previous fall, Geithner huddled with top aides to develop what one called an “Elizabeth Warren strategy,” a plan to engage with the firebrand reformer that would render her politically inert. He never worked out a viable strategy–a way to meet with Warren without drawing undesirable comparisons–and so, like the president, he didn’t.

What the Treasury Department did do, unbeknownst to Warren, was embrace demands from the banking industry to create a bureau under the condition that Warren would not be allowed to lead it.  [...] The industry managed to get the proposed agency shrunk into a bureau that would live under the auspices of the Federal Reserve…

It may seem like all of the events currently swirling are unrelated and happening separately, but as days and weeks pass there is a common thread running through them all and it’s not going away.

AFTER-TAX INCOME GREW MORE FOR HIGHEST-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS

After-tax income for the highest-income households grew more than it did for any other group. (After-tax income is income after federal taxes have been deducted and government transfers—which are payments to people through such programs as Social Security and Unemployment Insurance—have been added.)

CBO finds that, between 1979 and 2007, income grew by:

  • 275 percent for the top 1 percent of households,
  • 65 percent for the next 19 percent,
  • Just under 40 percent for the next 60 percent, and
  • 18 percent for the bottom 20 percent.

The title to this piece has been changed.

Read full story · Comments { 9 }

Romney Does Damage Control Over Kasich Flap

When right wing talker Bill Cunningham opposes something from John Kasich, it’s a moment to sit up and take notice. Cunningham is not only a good friend of Kasich, but a die hard supporter. Last night on Schultz’s show, Cunningham and the working class hero, Schultz, found common cause. It was a beautiful thing. But then, even Cunningham knows when you strip collective bargaining out you’re hurting cops and firefighters. As the right wing talker said last night, in Ohio, these heroes won’t be voting Republican anytime soon.

Now to Romney, from The Hill:

Romney, during a visit to a GOP phone bank in Ohio Tuesday, earned the ire of conservatives when he indicated he would not take a stand on Ohio ballot Issue 2, which seeks to overturn Kasich’s legislation limiting the collective bargaining power of government union workers.

“I fully support Gov. Kasich’s Question 2 in Ohio,” Romney said at a campaign stop in Virginia Wednesday. “I’m sorry if I created any confusion there.”

I’ll give Mr. Romney credit for one thing. He went the full distance to day he was sorry for whiffing the moment. Mitt’s wrong, of course, but he’s sorry.

However, it was stupid. But Mitt making the case for collective bargaining rights for cops and firefighters, to name just two groups, is just not in Mr. Wall Street’s soul.

Read full story · Comments { 0 }

About the Book Cover

The party’s over.
The view from a recovering partisan.

My e-book is scheduled to be published two weeks from today, November 8th. It will be available on Amazon, to download on Kindle, or on Barnes and Noble, as well as your iPad. It’s a busy, exciting time in my world.

Since I announced my book two weeks ago, I’ve had a lot of feedback on the cover. Continue Reading →

Read full story · Comments { 28 }

Obama Fans Go ‘Puma’

The insipid fan politics that has blown up over Pres. Obama’s announcement on U.S. military troop withdrawal from Iraq is unworthy of the subject. Whether it’s in the comments or emails, Obama fans have now morphed into the 2012 version of “puma,” expecting allegiance or bellyaching ensues. For those of you who have forgotten, “puma” wasn’t welcome around here.

When Pres. Obama made the announcement on U.S. troop withdrawal, initially I simply put up the video, that was it, nothing else. These are the very first two comments that appeared:

Solo 21 October 2011 at 2:31 pm
Taylor I am breathlessly waiting to see how you and your followers are going to turn this into a negative!

Solo 21 October 2011 at 2:33 pm
I predict that you and your people are going to say one of two things. It’s no big deal or he should have done this sooner. LOL! Obama2012!

Not one word about Iraq or foreign policy, just this drivel. The conversation took off from there, Iraq and the seriousness the U.S. faces in that country taking second place, hijacked by fan politics. This type of comment continued throughout the thread.

For those of you who don’t know the history of this site, I urge you to read the facts rather than follow the Obamabot trail.

I thought it was pretty clear where I was taking TM.com over the last months, even years. But not even Joyce Arnold’s “Two Parties – Too Few Choices” series gave Obama fans a clue. I have encouraged and talked with Joyce about this series since its inception for a very good reason.

The Democratic and Republican parties have failed this country. It’s not “Washington” that is the problem. It’s our two-party system and the weak politicians who inhabit it who have been bought off, locking the American people out of it, unless of course you’re part of the 1%.

Pres. Obama has driven the political and policy conversations to the right, emboldening Republicans.

As for the GOP, I’m aghast and disgusted with the candidates who are auditioning for commander in chief. Jon Huntsman is at least qualified for that part of the presidency, though woefully lacking on others, but he’s not going to get a chance, so Mitt Romney is their most sane candidate, though who knows if he’ll survive. My bet has been he will and I hope so, because we at least need someone serious to challenge him and 9-9-9 man won’t get it done. However, on foreign policy Mr. Romney is only as good as his closest adviser, which looking at Cofer “the gloves come off” Black doesn’t hold out much optimism.

A race between Obama and Romney is perfect for where the two-party system is today: bankrupt on principle, bankrolled and beholden to Wall Street and corporations, and offering no real choice to voters at all. Maybe seeing Obama vs. Romney will wake people up to this pathetic reality in American politics, perhaps move our country one small step away from having only two choices for president.

Contrary to the squeals of “hate,” etc. lobbed against people commenting on this site, the readers around here are very smart and are motivated beyond emotion. Their opinions are linked to actual policy decisions being carried out or those that are not, not their besotted allegiance to a single politician.

The rightward lurch of Pres. Obama, which has led the country, the Democratic Party and our politics further away from progressive economics is simultaneously threatening the American safety net. This is unacceptable, but both Republicans and Democrats would rather carve the New Deal up than adjust our involvement around the world. Both parties refuse to focus on priorities that will help the middle class and put our economic and domestic house in order, allowing the Pentagon to continue their stranglehold on the money pipeline.

Unless more independent voices make it into the system nothing will ever change.

As for around here, we need more voices in the comment section; some of you who are emailing me need to step up and join in. But not to add more fan politics to the pile, but to talk about policies and how our politicians in both parties are failing we the people.

There are many reasons people, independents, progressives and Democrats, are un-enthused about 2012 and Pres. Obama’s reelection. Most of the criticism coming at Pres. Obama and the Democratic Party is justified. So certainly you Obama die-hards who comment can find a way to keep it to the issues, instead of turning this into a politician pimping brawl by going “puma.”

Read full story · Comments { 44 }

Taylor Marsh Authors The Hillary Effect – Politics, Sexism and the Destiny of Loss

Due out in November. Available on Amazon.com, on your Kindle, Barnes & Noble, Nook, and iPad.

Spanning nearly two decades of American politics, The Hillary Effect is the provocative and insightful story of the first viable female presidential candidate in history to win a primary and do so in spite of her campaign team’s mistakes. And the galvanizing impact that her loss represented for both women and men, in and out of Washington. It revolves around media coverage that treated her differently as first lady, senator and then presidential candidate – not only because she was a woman, but because she was Hillary Clinton.

Candidly written by veteran political analyst, Taylor Marsh, it is the view from a recovering partisan, someone who the Washington Post called a “die hard Clintonite” in their profile of her in 2008.
The Hillary Effect began when Hillary, as first lady, dared to challenge China’s treatment of women. A countless number of women have and will benefit from her presidential loss, the most famous being Sarah Palin (the Tea Party queen of 2010 and first female on a national Republican presidential ticket), who weaves throughout this story as the anti-Hillary. The Hillary Effect also sees Michele Bachman as a player, as the first Republican female to win a straw poll, primary or caucus.

The male leads in this stunning tale are Bill Clinton and President Barack Obama (someone who turned out to be very different from candidate Obama), with David Plouffe and Mark Penn making appearances. The story includes a host of media personalities and their outlets, but also new media and progressive voices, and famous names like Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, Sally Quinn, the late Tim Russert, Richard Wolffe, Laura Ingraham, Liz Cheney, Peggy Noonan, Maureen Dowd, Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and even Bill O’Reilly, who offered Hillary the best interview she would do during the 2008 season.

All of this is seen through the economic and political crises of today, health care, women’s individual freedoms being challenged by the right, Afghanistan, women’s rise around the world, the debt ceiling debate, tax cuts for the wealthy, Occupy Wall Street and an American public disenchanted with Republicans and Democrats, just as the race for 2012 revs up.

Read full story · Comments { 0 }

Pres. Obama, Where’s the Leverage?

“Pass this jobs bill… Pass this jobs bill… Pass this jobs bill…” times 17. The patter was hot and strong from the top, while Pres. Obama rocked the house. But it eventually broke down to blousy rhetoric meant to reach out to Independent and swing voters, but also Republicans.

Oh, and next week we’re going to do deficit reduction, and Medicare “reform,” meaning benefit changes and raising the retirement age.

Part of what I said to the Dow Jones/WSJ digital unit:

7:19 P.M: Obama said early in the speech that it’s not about politics. Is that true?

“Of course not,” said Taylor Marsh, political blogger and analyst. “The reason he did this speech in the first place is all political. And anyone who says this isn’t part of a re-election speech isn’t facing reality.”

He could be more aggressive, said Marsh.

“He needs to pressure his opponents so they feel uncomfortable saying no. He needs to target his opponents and focus on the need for infrastructure in their districts,” she said. “Pick a bridge in Boehner’s district and cite that as a need for spending. He needs to get in their face.”

It looks like Obama is going to Cantor’s home turf tomorrow, then Boehner’s, but what project is he going to be talking about? That’s the bottom line.

At one point, Marc Ambinder tweeted exactly what I was thinking: Conservatives don’t like to hear it, but when Obama’s in this mode, most Americans like him. And they want him to succeed.

Pres. Obama needs to start reading more about Lyndon Baines Johnson. If there’s no tactic to shame Republicans into passing the bill, why will they?

Full text below…

Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, and fellow Americans:

Tonight we meet at an urgent time for our country. We continue to face an economic crisis that has left millions of our neighbors jobless, and a political crisis that has made things worse.

This past week, reporters have been asking “What will this speech mean for the President? What will it mean for Congress? How will it affect their polls, and the next election?”

But the millions of Americans who are watching right now: they don’t care about politics. They have real life concerns. Many have spent months looking for work. Others are doing their best just to scrape by – giving up nights out with the family to save on gas or make the mortgage; postponing retirement to send a kid to college.

These men and women grew up with faith in an America where hard work and responsibility paid off. They believed in a country where everyone gets a fair shake and does their fair share – where if you stepped up, did your job, and were loyal to your company, that loyalty would be rewarded with a decent salary and good benefits; maybe a raise once in awhile. If you did the right thing, you could make it in America.

But for decades now, Americans have watched that compact erode. They have seen the deck too often stacked against them. And they know that Washington hasn’t always put their interests first.

The people of this country work hard to meet their responsibilities. The question tonight is whether we’ll meet ours. The question is whether, in the face of an ongoing national crisis, we can stop the political circus and actually do something to help the economy; whether we can restore some of the fairness and security that has defined this nation since our beginning.

Those of us here tonight can’t solve all of our nation’s woes. Ultimately, our recovery will be driven not by Washington, but by our businesses and our workers. But we can help. We can make a difference. There are steps we can take right now to improve people’s lives.

I am sending this Congress a plan that you should pass right away. It’s called the American Jobs Act. There should be nothing controversial about this piece of legislation. Everything in here is the kind of proposal that’s been supported by both Democrats and Republicans – including many who sit here tonight. And everything in this bill will be paid for. Everything.

The purpose of the American Jobs Act is simple: to put more people back to work and more money in the pockets of those who are working. It will create more jobs for construction workers, more jobs for teachers, more jobs for veterans, and more jobs for the long-term unemployed. It will provide a tax break for companies who hire new workers, and it will cut payroll taxes in half for every working American and every small business. It will provide a jolt to an economy that has stalled, and give companies confidence that if they invest and hire, there will be customers for their products and services. You should pass this jobs plan right away.

Everyone here knows that small businesses are where most new jobs begin. And you know that while corporate profits have come roaring back, smaller companies haven’t. So for everyone who speaks so passionately about making life easier for “job creators,” this plan is for you.

Pass this jobs bill, and starting tomorrow, small businesses will get a tax cut if they hire new workers or raise workers’ wages. Pass this jobs bill, and all small business owners will also see their payroll taxes cut in half next year. If you have 50 employees making an average salary, that’s an $80,000 tax cut. And all businesses will be able to continue writing off the investments they make in 2012.

It’s not just Democrats who have supported this kind of proposal. Fifty House Republicans have proposed the same payroll tax cut that’s in this plan. You should pass it right away.

Pass this jobs bill, and we can put people to work rebuilding America. Everyone here knows that we have badly decaying roads and bridges all over this country. Our highways are clogged with traffic. Our skies are the most congested in the world.

This is inexcusable. Building a world-class transportation system is part of what made us an economic superpower. And now we’re going to sit back and watch China build newer airports and faster railroads? At a time when millions of unemployed construction workers could build them right here in America?

There are private construction companies all across America just waiting to get to work. There’s a bridge that needs repair between Ohio and Kentucky that’s on one of the busiest trucking routes in North America. A public transit project in Houston that will help clear up one of the worst areas of traffic in the country. And there are schools throughout this country that desperately need renovating. How can we expect our kids to do their best in places that are literally falling apart? This is America. Every child deserves a great school – and we can give it to them, if we act now.

The American Jobs Act will repair and modernize at least 35,000 schools. It will put people to work right now fixing roofs and windows; installing science labs and high-speed internet in classrooms all across this country. It will rehabilitate homes and businesses in communities hit hardest by foreclosures. It will jumpstart thousands of transportation projects across the country. And to make sure the money is properly spent and for good purposes, we’re building on reforms we’ve already put in place. No more earmarks. No more boondoggles. No more bridges to nowhere. We’re cutting the red tape that prevents some of these projects from getting started as quickly as possible. And we’ll set up an independent fund to attract private dollars and issue loans based on two criteria: how badly a construction project is needed and how much good it would do for the economy.

This idea came from a bill written by a Texas Republican and a Massachusetts Democrat. The idea for a big boost in construction is supported by America’s largest business organization and America’s largest labor organization. It’s the kind of proposal that’s been supported in the past by Democrats and Republicans alike. You should pass it right away.

Pass this jobs bill, and thousands of teachers in every state will go back to work. These are the men and women charged with preparing our children for a world where the competition has never been tougher. But while they’re adding teachers in places like South Korea, we’re laying them off in droves. It’s unfair to our kids. It undermines their future and ours. And it has to stop. Pass this jobs bill, and put our teachers back in the classroom where they belong.

Pass this jobs bill, and companies will get extra tax credits if they hire America’s veterans. We ask these men and women to leave their careers, leave their families, and risk their lives to fight for our country. The last thing they should have to do is fight for a job when they come home.

Pass this bill, and hundreds of thousands of disadvantaged young people will have the hope and dignity of a summer job next year. And their parents, low-income Americans who desperately want to work, will have more ladders out of poverty.

Pass this jobs bill, and companies will get a $4,000 tax credit if they hire anyone who has spent more than six months looking for a job. We have to do more to help the long-term unemployed in their search for work. This jobs plan builds on a program in Georgia that several Republican leaders have highlighted, where people who collect unemployment insurance participate in temporary work as a way to build their skills while they look for a permanent job. The plan also extends unemployment insurance for another year. If the millions of unemployed Americans stopped getting this insurance, and stopped using that money for basic necessities, it would be a devastating blow to this economy. Democrats and Republicans in this Chamber have supported unemployment insurance plenty of times in the past. At this time of prolonged hardship, you should pass it again – right away.

Pass this jobs bill, and the typical working family will get a fifteen hundred dollar tax cut next year. Fifteen hundred dollars that would have been taken out of your paycheck will go right into your pocket. This expands on the tax cut that Democrats and Republicans already passed for this year. If we allow that tax cut to expire – if we refuse to act – middle-class families will get hit with a tax increase at the worst possible time. We cannot let that happen. I know some of you have sworn oaths to never raise any taxes on anyone for as long as you live. Now is not the time to carve out an exception and raise middle-class taxes, which is why you should pass this bill right away.

This is the American Jobs Act. It will lead to new jobs for construction workers, teachers, veterans, first responders, young people and the long-term unemployed. It will provide tax credits to companies that hire new workers, tax relief for small business owners, and tax cuts for the middle-class. And here’s the other thing I want the American people to know: the American Jobs Act will not add to the deficit. It will be paid for. And here’s how:

The agreement we passed in July will cut government spending by about $1 trillion over the next ten years. It also charges this Congress to come up with an additional $1.5 trillion in savings by Christmas. Tonight, I’m asking you to increase that amount so that it covers the full cost of the American Jobs Act. And a week from Monday, I’ll be releasing a more ambitious deficit plan – a plan that will not only cover the cost of this jobs bill, but stabilize our debt in the long run.

This approach is basically the one I’ve been advocating for months. In addition to the trillion dollars of spending cuts I’ve already signed into law, it’s a balanced plan that would reduce the deficit by making additional spending cuts; by making modest adjustments to health care programs like Medicare and Medicaid; and by reforming our tax code in a way that asks the wealthiest Americans and biggest corporations to pay their fair share. What’s more, the spending cuts wouldn’t happen so abruptly that they’d be a drag on our economy, or prevent us from helping small business and middle-class families get back on their feet right away.

Now, I realize there are some in my party who don’t think we should make any changes at all to Medicare and Medicaid, and I understand their concerns. But here’s the truth. Millions of Americans rely on Medicare in their retirement. And millions more will do so in the future. They pay for this benefit during their working years. They earn it. But with an aging population and rising health care costs, we are spending too fast to sustain the program. And if we don’t gradually reform the system while protecting current beneficiaries, it won’t be there when future retirees need it. We have to reform Medicare to strengthen it.

I’m also well aware that there are many Republicans who don’t believe we should raise taxes on those who are most fortunate and can best afford it. But here is what every American knows. While most people in this country struggle to make ends meet, a few of the most affluent citizens and corporations enjoy tax breaks and loopholes that nobody else gets. Right now, Warren Buffet pays a lower tax rate than his secretary – an outrage he has asked us to fix. We need a tax code where everyone gets a fair shake, and everybody pays their fair share. And I believe the vast majority of wealthy Americans and CEOs are willing to do just that, if it helps the economy grow and gets our fiscal house in order.

I’ll also offer ideas to reform a corporate tax code that stands as a monument to special interest influence in Washington. By eliminating pages of loopholes and deductions, we can lower one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world. Our tax code shouldn’t give an advantage to companies that can afford the best-connected lobbyists. It should give an advantage to companies that invest and create jobs here in America.

So we can reduce this deficit, pay down our debt, and pay for this jobs plan in the process. But in order to do this, we have to decide what our priorities are. We have to ask ourselves, “What’s the best way to grow the economy and create jobs?”

Should we keep tax loopholes for oil companies? Or should we use that money to give small business owners a tax credit when they hire new workers? Because we can’t afford to do both. Should we keep tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires? Or should we put teachers back to work so our kids can graduate ready for college and good jobs? Right now, we can’t afford to do both.

This isn’t political grandstanding. This isn’t class warfare. This is simple math. These are real choices that we have to make. And I’m pretty sure I know what most Americans would choose. It’s not even close. And it’s time for us to do what’s right for our future.

The American Jobs Act answers the urgent need to create jobs right away. But we can’t stop there. As I’ve argued since I ran for this office, we have to look beyond the immediate crisis and start building an economy that lasts into the future – an economy that creates good, middle-class jobs that pay well and offer security. We now live in a world where technology has made it possible for companies to take their business anywhere. If we want them to start here and stay here and hire here, we have to be able to out-build, out-educate, and out-innovate every other country on Earth.

This task, of making America more competitive for the long haul, is a job for all of us. For government and for private companies. For states and for local communities – and for every American citizen. All of us will have to up our game. All of us will have to change the way we do business.

My administration can and will take some steps to improve our competitiveness on our own. For example, if you’re a small business owner who has a contract with the federal government, we’re going to make sure you get paid a lot faster than you do now. We’re also planning to cut away the red tape that prevents too many rapidly-growing start-up companies from raising capital and going public. And to help responsible homeowners, we’re going to work with Federal housing agencies to help more people refinance their mortgages at interest rates that are now near 4% — a step that can put more than $2,000 a year in a family’s pocket, and give a lift to an economy still burdened by the drop in housing prices.

Other steps will require Congressional action. Today you passed reform that will speed up the outdated patent process, so that entrepreneurs can turn a new idea into a new business as quickly as possible. That’s the kind of action we need. Now it’s time to clear the way for a series of trade agreements that would make it easier for American companies to sell their products in Panama, Colombia, and South Korea – while also helping the workers whose jobs have been affected by global competition. If Americans can buy Kias and Hyundais, I want to see folks in South Korea driving Fords and Chevys and Chryslers. I want to see more products sold around the world stamped with three proud words: “Made in America.”

And on all of our efforts to strengthen competitiveness, we need to look for ways to work side-by-side with America’s businesses. That’s why I’ve brought together a Jobs Council of leaders from different industries who are developing a wide range of new ideas to help companies grow and create jobs.

Already, we’ve mobilized business leaders to train 10,000 American engineers a year, by providing company internships and training. Other businesses are covering tuition for workers who learn new skills at community colleges. And we’re going to make sure the next generation of manufacturing takes root not in China or Europe, but right here, in the United States of America. If we provide the right incentives and support – and if we make sure our trading partners play by the rules – we can be the ones to build everything from fuel-efficient cars to advanced biofuels to semiconductors that are sold all over the world. That’s how America can be number one again. That’s how America will be number one again.

Now, I realize that some of you have a different theory on how to grow the economy. Some of you sincerely believe that the only solution to our economic challenges is to simply cut most government spending and eliminate most government regulations.

Well, I agree that we can’t afford wasteful spending, and I will continue to work with Congress to get rid of it. And I agree that there are some rules and regulations that put an unnecessary burden on businesses at a time when they can least afford it. That’s why I ordered a review of all government regulations. So far, we’ve identified over 500 reforms, which will save billions of dollars over the next few years. We should have no more regulation than the health, safety, and security of the American people require. Every rule should meet that common sense test.

But what we can’t do – what I won’t do – is let this economic crisis be used as an excuse to wipe out the basic protections that Americans have counted on for decades. I reject the idea that we need to ask people to choose between their jobs and their safety. I reject the argument that says for the economy to grow, we have to roll back protections that ban hidden fees by credit card companies, or rules that keep our kids from being exposed to mercury, or laws that prevent the health insurance industry from shortchanging patients. I reject the idea that we have to strip away collective bargaining rights to compete in a global economy. We shouldn’t be in a race to the bottom, where we try to offer the cheapest labor and the worst pollution standards. America should be in a race to the top. And I believe that’s a race we can win.

In fact, this larger notion that the only thing we can do to restore prosperity is just dismantle government, refund everyone’s money, let everyone write their own rules, and tell everyone they’re on their own – that’s not who we are. That’s not the story of America.

Yes, we are rugged individualists. Yes, we are strong and self-reliant. And it has been the drive and initiative of our workers and entrepreneurs that has made this economy the engine and envy of the world.

But there has always been another thread running throughout our history – a belief that we are all connected; and that there are some things we can only do together, as a nation.

We all remember Abraham Lincoln as the leader who saved our Union. But in the middle of a Civil War, he was also a leader who looked to the future – a Republican president who mobilized government to build the transcontinental railroad; launch the National Academy of Sciences; and set up the first land grant colleges. And leaders of both parties have followed the example he set.

Ask yourselves – where would we be right now if the people who sat here before us decided not to build our highways and our bridges; our dams and our airports? What would this country be like if we had chosen not to spend money on public high schools, or research universities, or community colleges? Millions of returning heroes, including my grandfather, had the opportunity to go to school because of the GI Bill. Where would we be if they hadn’t had that chance?

How many jobs would it have cost us if past Congresses decided not to support the basic research that led to the Internet and the computer chip? What kind of country would this be if this Chamber had voted down Social Security or Medicare just because it violated some rigid idea about what government could or could not do? How many Americans would have suffered as a result?

No single individual built America on their own. We built it together. We have been, and always will be, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all; a nation with responsibilities to ourselves and with responsibilities to one another. Members of Congress, it is time for us to meet our responsibilities.

Every proposal I’ve laid out tonight is the kind that’s been supported by Democrats and Republicans in the past. Every proposal I’ve laid out tonight will be paid for. And every proposal is designed to meet the urgent needs of our people and our communities.

I know there’s been a lot of skepticism about whether the politics of the moment will allow us to pass this jobs plan – or any jobs plan. Already, we’re seeing the same old press releases and tweets flying back and forth. Already, the media has proclaimed that it’s impossible to bridge our differences. And maybe some of you have decided that those differences are so great that we can only resolve them at the ballot box.

But know this: the next election is fourteen months away. And the people who sent us here – the people who hired us to work for them – they don’t have the luxury of waiting fourteen months. Some of them are living week to week; paycheck to paycheck; even day to day. They need help, and they need it now.

I don’t pretend that this plan will solve all our problems. It shouldn’t be, nor will it be, the last plan of action we propose. What’s guided us from the start of this crisis hasn’t been the search for a silver bullet. It’s been a commitment to stay at it – to be persistent – to keep trying every new idea that works, and listen to every good proposal, no matter which party comes up with it.

Regardless of the arguments we’ve had in the past, regardless of the arguments we’ll have in the future, this plan is the right thing to do right now. You should pass it. And I intend to take that message to every corner of this country. I also ask every American who agrees to lift your voice and tell the people who are gathered here tonight that you want action now. Tell Washington that doing nothing is not an option. Remind us that if we act as one nation, and one people, we have it within our power to meet this challenge.

President Kennedy once said, “Our problems are man-made – therefore they can be solved by man. And man can be as big as he wants.”

These are difficult years for our country. But we are Americans. We are tougher than the times that we live in, and we are bigger than our politics have been. So let’s meet the moment. Let’s get to work, and show the world once again why the United States of America remains the greatest nation on Earth. Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.

Read full story · Comments { 7 }

Obama’s ‘American Jobs Act’: It’s Bipartisan!

Pres. Obama’s speech streaming live at 7 pm EST.

[...] Steve Bell, senior director of the bipartisan Economic Policy Project, said Wednesday that the scope of the plan is too small. “It doesn’t even sound good,” he said, arguing instead for a $640 billion, 12-month payroll tax holiday for employers and employees. … – White House: Obama’s ‘American Jobs Act’ will include new ideas

Yesterday when Sen. Harry Reid’s office tweeted that Pres. Obama’s jobs pitch was bipartisan, challenging Republicans to get on board, it seemed obvious what would be next.

From the Atlantic’s Chris Frates, the White House talking points, which you’ll hear regurgitated by Democratic surrogates on cable all day.

The American Jobs Act is:

– based on bi-partisan ideas;

– it is fully paid for by closing corporate tax loopholes and asking the wealthiest Americans to pay their fair share; and

– it will have an impact on job and economic growth NOW — just as soon as Congress acts.

– Every day, people in this country are working hard to meet their responsibilities. The question now is whether Washington will meet theirs.

– The time for obstruction and gridlock is over. Congress needs to put country ahead of politics.

– The American people know that the economic crisis and the deep recession weren’t created overnight and won’t be solved overnight. The economic security of the American middle class has been under attack for decades.

– That’s why President Obama believes we need to do more than just recover from this economic crisis.

– The President is rebuilding the economy the American way — based on balance, fairness and the same set of rules for everyone from Wall Street to Main Street where hard work and responsibility pay and gaming the system is penalized.

– It’s an American economy that’s built to last and creates the jobs of the future, by forcing Washington to live within its means so we can invest in small business entrepreneurs, education, and making things the world buys, not outsourcing, loopholes and reckless financial deals that put middle class security at risk.

Convinced?

Me neither.

TM Note: I’ll be online tonight, while doing political analysis of the speech and its practical impact for the Dow Jones/Wall Street Journal Digital Network team.

Read full story · Comments { 16 }

Team Obama Yearns to Recapture 2008 ‘Spirit’

He is frustrated — particularly at Republicans on Capitol Hill, but also at some of his own aides, according to people who have spoken to him recently — that he has been unable to rise above the morass of Washington and recapture the spirit that helped him win election. – Jeff Zeleny

Pres. Obama’s “job speech” isn’t going to be a “jobs speech” at all. It’s a competing rhetorical gambit in a week where Republicans are debating who should take him on in 2012. Zeleny proves it by one line he wrote today. Team Obama wants to “recapture the spirit that helped him win election.”

Could anything be more gauzy, less tangible, void of purpose, while also revealing the central lack of vision element of Obama’s presidency?

Segue to one line in Bloomberg’s report on Obama’s so called “jobs speech”: Almost half the stimulus would come from tax cuts…

Team Obama will never capture the 2008 “spirit” that elected Barack Obama, because people now know it was predicated on a marketing myth. People now know there was nothing behind the “spirit” but emotions tied to fan politics, which Obama can only hope will turn to practical “lesser of two evils” voting once the Republicans have a nominee.

Sure people still like the guy, but the question, Is this all there is?, has now been answered unequivocally.

Oh, and promises won’t work anymore, because Pres. Obama’s gone one to many times to the tool-less word workshop.

Zeleny gets the coveted White House access, but the quote he gets from David Axelrod is one for the books:

“If this is just a referendum on economic conditions, then any incumbent is going to struggle with that, but it’s not just that. It’s a contest about what to do about it,” said David Axelrod, the chief strategist to the president’s re-election campaign. “I’d be more worried if I saw some compelling new argument for how to lead the country, but these guys are carrying the same old water.”

Speaking of “same old water,” let’s consider what Politico calls the “two central measures” to be included in Obama’s “jobs package.”

The two central measures in the Obama jobs package are expected to be a one-year extension of the payroll tax cut and an extension of expiring jobless benefits, according to the AP. Those two initiatives would total around $170 billion.

These two initiatives are the very definition of “same old water,” even though they’re both needed and important. David Dayen has more.

What’s new in Obama’s “jobs package”? A “public works projects will be included, but the AP reports that this will be less than $50 billion of the package.” I guess that’s something, but get out the crayon labeled “puny” to color me unimpressed.

Woven into this discussion is the little mentioned “deficit reduction” side of the package. Shorter: tinkering with some part of entitlements. See Ezra Klein:

Getting less attention in the media is the follow-up speech the White House is planning, which will lay out a specific deficit-reduction agenda that not only meets the $1.5 trillion goal of the “supercommittee,” but exceeds it and pays for the new jobs spending. These proposals will look quite similar to the grand bargain the White House offered Speaker John Boehner, and liberal groups are grimly preparing for the administration to call for raising the Medicare eligibility age.

Whatever “spirit” Team Obama is trying to recapture isn’t going to be done by doing paltry things being floated in the media, while Bill Daley negotiates with Obama’s corporate friends to gut the EPA, as candidate Obama panders to labor and his Democratic base as he moves to change entitlements, all of which is about appeasing Independents int he hopes of being reelected while standing for absolutely nothing.

Read full story · Comments { 22 }

Pres. Obama at Lowest Point in Polls, But Candidate Obama is Just Getting Started

It’s grim.

Just 43 percent now approve of the job he is doing overall, a new career low; 53 percent disapprove, a new high.

Really, really grim.

“Obama is no longer the favorite to win re-election,” Hart said, explaining that a head-to-head score will usually conform to the generic one, especially when so many believe the country is headed in the wrong direction.

But memories seem awfully short. Regardless of Obama’s numbers today he remains one of the most formidable politicians in modern times. So, without a challenge from the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party no one should count him out. It doesn’t seem the presidential election of 2012 has Democrats worried about Obama’s Republicanism or the fact that they no longer stand for anything, while morphing two parties into one gigantic non-choice.

When you imagine Rick Perry, the negative ads on “Sonogram Perry” targeting women write themselves, though that’s hardly his only political albatross.

No one can win the presidency without women and no matter the ideology, Independent and even moderate Republican women will not vote for Rick Perry, at least not in any numbers. He’s a Republican turn-off and a Democratic turn on.

Mitt Romney needs a Tea Party veep, it seems to me, or someone like Marco Rubio or Nikki Haley (who could aid a Perry nomination, too). But the wingnuttery of Republican primary voters may prevent the possibility.

Pres. Obama really doesn’t deserve to be reelected. But he could be in spite of himself and thanks to a Republican Party that can’t get a grip on reality, but also because Democrats and progressives don’t seem that incensed that Barack Obama has destroyed the Democratic brand.

Read full story · Comments { 30 }

Fox News Channel Strikes Again, Edits Hoffa’s Speech

This is one of the sleaziest, most dishonest things I’ve ever seen Fox News do. People need to start seriously asking what’s going on with a news organization that would try to pull something like this. – Charles Johnson

HOFFA: Everybody here’s got to vote. If we go back and keep the eye on the prize, let’s take these son of a bitches out and give America back to America where we belong! Thank you very much!

There was no “don’t retreat, reload” gun metaphor standing by itself. No crosshairs gun poster targeting specific politicians.

Instead, after talking about getting out the vote, Teamster’s Hoffa said Democrats have to take these SOBs out. No regrets, said Hoffa.

The “Morning Joe” crowd needed smelling salts and expected Pres. Obama to denounce Mr. Hoffa. They played a silly Obama kumbaya speech from 2010 about civility, while Joe Scarborough, Pat Buchanan and Willie Geist weren’t interested at all in Hoffa’s full quote.

This is the way it’s done when a powerful get out the vote organization starts revving up its base.

Pres. Obama would be nuts to say anything, given how badly he needs labor, though I wouldn’t be surprised if Jay Carney made some sort of statement to pacify politicos today some time.

But this latest stunt by Fox News is fitting considering the continued behavior of Chris Wallace and his cohorts, because they’re double standard of “fair and balanced” is only going to get worse as 2012 gets closer.

Civility is overrated. Ask our founders.

Read full story · Comments { 16 }

Gloria Steinem to Headline Obama Park Avenue Fundraiser

“… Without the women’s vote — because women comprise the majority of the electorate — it’s virtually impossible for a candidate to win the election.” – Jennifer Lawless, director of the Women and Politics Institute at American University

This is the alternate, political version of why buy the milk if the cow is free?, with the biggest feminist names in Democratic politics giving away their power for a President who not only served up women’s freedoms and codified the Hyde Amendment, but also put entitlements on the table, which keep women out of poverty in old age. …and I guess everyone forgot the debt ceiling debate began without one single woman in the room.

So, to review where women have been in the Democratic debt ceiling debacle. Pres. Obama’s debt ceiling meeting started with not one single woman in the room.

At Blair House, the old boys club meeting has consisted of Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA), U.S. Senators John Kyl (R-AZ), Daniel Inouye (D-HI), Max Baucus (D-MT), Reps. Jim Clyburn (D-SC), and Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), who have convened for the budget negotiations with Vice President Biden, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, Budget Director Jack Lew, and economic adviser Gene Sperling. Where are the women? – National Council of Women’s Organization

Amanda Terkel’s report on Gloria Steinem headlining a huge fundraiser for Pres. Obama’s reelection is conclusive proof that today’s establishment women do not take their power or purpose in politics seriously anymore. Instead of taking a page from Richard Trumka, the Democratic girls are all in, succumbing to practical politics, because if they take on Democrats and Republicans win things will only get worse, or so the lunacy goes.

Women elect presidents, but this is the best progressive and Democratic women in positions of power can do?

These ladies have gotten comfortable with their titles, power and access, so they’ve gotten lazy and we’re all going to pay.

Ms. Steinem made her name by standing up against the odds women faced. With no one close to her power in place to take on what’s been happening in the Democratic Party, Steinem is left as a historic figurehead at the top of a fundraiser that means very little to most women today.

But it does represent the lowered value of Democratic ideals, with all that’s left is a show, with very little substance being represented. Now even the most powerful women on the Left have been suckered by the lure of money, while becoming part of the embarrassment of the elite machine without utilizing the power they’ve earned to get something better for women from the establishment they support.

First Lady Michelle Obama, longtime feminist activist Gloria Steinem and several other prominent Democratic women will be the featured guests at a fundraiser in New York City next month for President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign, in an effort to mobilize and energize Democratic women for 2012. The Park Avenue fundraiser on Sept. 20 will also feature EMILY’s List President Stephanie Schriock, Planned Parenthood Federation of America President Cecile Richards and Democratic National Committee Chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.). – Gloria Steinem To Headline Obama Fundraiser In New York City

A Park Avenue fundraiser, oh, it’s just so perfect for the current Democratic Party image, but especially for the women who wield power in it.

Never have Democrats been so far removed from the working man and woman.

Attending Democratic women may not all be part of the fan politics brigade of Pres. Obama’s He Can Do No Wrong Crowd, instead driven by practicalities in politics when looking at the Tea Party crowd, but hitching a ride on the Obama reelect bandwagon that has little luster and no connection to the average woman or her plight makes this crowd look Republican, the old school version.

Gloria Steinem, First Lady Michele Obama, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Stephanie Schriock, Cecile Richards and other Democratic women participating in this fundraising event don’t remotely represent the majority of women who’ll vote in 2012.

We’re mad as hell and don’t see any benefits to supporting a system that has locked our issues out and put our lives in economic jeopardy.

From a recent AP-GFK poll:

Women no longer are a bright spot for Obama.

At the 100-day mark of his presidency, they gave him significantly higher approval ratings than did men, 68 percent to 60 percent. That’s since fallen dramatically.

In the latest AP-GfK survey, less than half of all women and less than half of all men approve of the job Obama is doing. Just 50 percent of women said Obama deserves re-election.

Predictably, Clinton’s bundlers are all in too. The establishment is nothing if not a cozy click.

Perhaps the thought of Rick Perry taking Obama’s place is already doing the job, starting with revving up the insiders femmes, because a Tea Party takeover is a harrowing thought.

But since women have the power to elect the next president it’s interesting high profile Democratic women are using theirs to reelect Barack Obama, instead of leveraging the power we do have to make all the presidential wannabes court us.

What are women going to get for all this Park Avenue partying?

What are poor women going to get?

I wish I could say this whole spectacle surprises me, but practical politics is easier than waging a fight against elite Democrats you need to keep your organization afloat, especially since you have no intention of organizing women to do something monumental, like demand these corporate jackals tell us what they’re going to do to make our lives freer, our economic lives more secure, and our retirement security intact.

You don’t give away your vote or your money on the promise of something not quantified in policy specifics or a record that guarantees your getting your money’s worth.

Read full story · Comments { 17 }

Two Parties = Too Few Choices, Part V

Joyce L. Arnold: Liberal, lesbian, Independent, equality activist, writer.

“Ask not how evil we are. Ask how evil the other party is!” Vastleft

That “Kennedyeseque” (as Vastleft terms it) phrase sums things up, in terms of what the Two Party Front for the Oligarchy likes to see happening. It’s, “Look! Over there! Scary Barack Obama!” Or, “Look! Over there! Scary Rick Perry!” Or Bachmann, or whoever. Fear is a key tactic in maintaining the Duopoly. As I’m working to point out through this “Two Parties” series, there are multiple efforts challenging the two party system, from within and without, from the philosophical to protests.

BlueLyon asked in a recent blog post, “How Do You Know? Or, Critical Thinking is Hard.

The problem isn’t that we aren’t in the street, or that the Tea Party is. The problem isn’t merely with the people we’ve put into office. The problem is that too few of us engage in critical thinking … . We don’t examine the candidates who stand before us … .

Being “in the streets” is an important piece of holding Electeds accountable. So is asking “How do I know?”, how do I arrive at my conclusions. Reading through material at the links I’ve provided (at the end), it’s clear a great deal of thought and action are going into how our monetarily entrenched system can be challenged.

A single issue focus probably won’t “grow” a party, but it can be a part of the process toward political change. Right now, in DC, a small group of people is using a vintage protest action, the sit-in. I think the discussions and analyses regarding our election and political system are crucial. So are actions. And sometimes I think the “action” part gets lost in all the words.

At Huffington Post, “TransCanada Pipeline Protesters: Who They Are, Why They Came”:

The debate over the Keystone XL oil pipeline reached a fever pitch this week as activists led by author and environmentalist Bill McKibben called on Barack Obama to deny presidential approval to the TransCanada project, which would stretch from tar sands in Canada to oil refineries in south Texas. Tuesday marked the fifth day of protests as well as the arrival of dozens of Gulf Coast residents to sit-ins before the White House.

The protests, slated to run through Sept. 3, have drawn a geographically diverse group of activists from as far away as California and Montana. As of Wednesday morning, 275 had been arrested by the U.S. Park Police. Hundreds more are on their way to Washington.

Now, “hundreds” isn’t the kind of thing that usually gets much media, or political, attention. A part of the political reform and create process is making ways for people like those protesting to be heard, in spite of ties between the MSM, the DC Elite, and the corporations who pay most of them.

‘Our Gulf Coast is very fragile … . We can’t go back and repair it … once they destroy it,’ said Paul Nelson, a commercial fisherman from Alabama. …

Other activists came to Washington to protest what they describe as the devastating health effects of oil refining and processing in Gulf Coast communities. … Bryan Parras, co-founder of Texas Environmental Justice Advocacy Services (said) … ‘there was a study done that said if you live within two miles of the Houston ship channel, … you have a 50 percent higher chance of contracting childhood leukemia.’ …

According to event organizers, over 2000 people signed up to be a part of the protest, and while media attention is obviously helpful,

Protesters … are more concerned about getting the attention of the White House.

‘TransCanada … need(s) a presidential permit to build that pipeline across our border,’ Mike Tidwell, founder of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, told a crowd of protesters gathered at the White House on Monday, ‘and President Obama has the ability to say yes or no.’ …

Along with Bill McKibben, one of those arrested was Jane Hamsher. Check out the series of posts Hamsher has written. This is from August 22, ”Did Obama Order Tar Sands Protesters Jailed?”:

In negotiations with the police prior to the action that began on Saturday, the police were very clear that what would happen after people were arrested was the vast majority would get what’s called ‘post and forfeit,’ where you put up $100, get released from jail after several hours, and you don’t have to come back again. …

… Instead, after arresting the first day’s 70 people, they (police) decided to hold most of them, all those not from within a 25-mile radius of Washington, D.C., in jail until a Monday afternoon arraignment. …

Why did they do this? … Four separate police officers told organizers that it was explicitly to discourage other people from taking part in actions going forward.

One other example of how people are acting on their words. Via Alternet ”Nurses Union Calls for Nationwide Action September 1 to Rebuild Main Street”: (emphasis mine)

Main Street is where the damage has been done and is being felt most deeply; DC is where deals are cut to protect Wall Street with breath-taking regularity. …

So, on Thursday, September 1, the nurses of National Nurses United will gather in more than 60 communities from Maine to Texas, and Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Michigan, Florida, Illinois, California and beyond to call on the nation’s elected officials to chose to protect and repair Main Street and stop cow-towing to Wall Street. …

The Wall Street Transaction Tax is a sales tax on the stocks, bonds, debt and other trades carried out by the financial industry. That’s the place to start. …

Find an event near you, ask your elected officials to attend and insist that they pledge to be a part of healing Main Street, and then stay tuned as the nurses keep up the kind of pressure needed to hold those who pledge to keep their promises and those who do not to stand to account.

Just two examples of the kind of actions being taken, and of the people who take them, people who defy the “nobody is doing anything” and “you have no choice” judgments. Like critical thinking, actions are hard work. And take time.

Below are links to earlier posts in this series. The last one includes a complete list, to date, of the political and party reform efforts I’ve found. More to come. And I want to keep hearing from you. Among other things, what’s going on in your state, and, are you seeing coalitions developing?

Posts in this series:
Grading the Electoral College
Two Parties = Too Few Choices
Two Parties = Too Few Choices, Part II
Two Parties = Too Few Choices, Part III
Two Parties = Too Few Choices, Part IV

(Photo via WatchingFrogsBoil)

Read full story · Comments { 14 }

Trumka to Dems: You’re on Your Own

Labor “ditching” Democrats to concentrate on building a stronger labor movement as 2012 begins to heat up plays into why the above ad from Democracy for America, that’s supposed to air across the country, looks and sounds so tone deaf to me. Blaming only Republicans for what’s going on misses the problem by a mile. One of the biggest challenges for labor and movement progressives has been the Democratic establishment, starting with Pres. Obama and his Administration.

Where was Pres. Obama during the Wisconsin fight? He was silent. Right now labor and the middle class need a champion and they don’t have one.

A Bloomberg article about the “workingman’s” plight gives an important backdrop to Trumka’s Democratic discontent.

That labor has finally gotten tired of the word salad promises from Pres. Obama that isn’t backed by action doesn’t surprise me. Yes, Republicans are worse, but when a Democratic Administration has proven itself to be weak on building up the middle and working classes, the lesser of two evils argument just isn’t good enough.

From Politico:

Going forward, Trumka said, the labor movement will build up its own political structures and organizations rather than contribute to and depend on the Democratic Party’s political operation.

“We’re going to use a lot of our money to build structures that work for working people” Trumka said. “You’re going to see us give less money to build structures for others, and more of our money will be used to build our own structure.”

Trumka’s remarks follow the news that the AFL-CIO will set up a so-called super PAC, allowing the nation’s largest labor federation to spend unlimited amounts of money on political activity for next year’s elections and beyond. Trumka confirmed Thursday that the union is moving forward with plans to create the PAC.

It’s long past time that Democratic supporters wake up and send a message to the current crop of political pansies. If they aren’t going to support what’s important to build a stronger middle class then they’re not part of the solution anymore, they’re the problem.

Evidently, Trumka has finally found his inner tea party gene. More Democrats and progressives need to find theirs, too.

Read full story · Comments { 13 }

Obama, Jobs and Economic Uncertainty

President Barack Obama receives an economic briefing from Brian Deese, Deputy Director of the National Economic Council, in Chilmark, Mass., August 24, 2011. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

From Reuters:

The president is widely expected to repeat his calls for an extension of a payroll tax cut, push for patent reform and bilateral free trade deals, and suggest an infrastructure bank to upgrade the country’s roads, airports and other facilities.

Retrofitting schools with energy efficient technology would allow the government to directly hire for labor-intensive work and also give a boost to the clean energy sector that Obama has said could be an important U.S. economic motor.

Other measures being considered, according to economists who have advised the White House, include tax credits for firms hiring more workers, funds for local governments to hire teachers, and retraining help for the long-term unemployed. Steps to boost the ailing housing market are also under review.

Complicating the fall outlook, however, is an article circulating from the UK Telegraph with a heart-stopping headline that could change everything:

Read full story · Comments { 10 }

Obama to Middle Class: More ‘Burden Sharing’ Required

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

…and the hits just keep on comin’.

Pres. Obama, campaigning in Iowa, got this response:

After waving her hat to get President Obama’s attention, Bev explained her history and posed the question. In response, The President remarked on how non-union workers, public and private reap the benefits established through collective bargaining. But he also called on unions to cut back just like everyone else.

…Bev said she’s satisfied with his answer but not as satisfied with the timing. “I wish he would have said something when the issues were happening in Wisconsin,” said Bev. …

But Bev also said she understands that Obama is a politician. She’s a lot smarter than Obama loyalists.

Mr. Obama talking about unions “burden sharing” is simply insulting. They’ve made concession after concession, which is more than you can say for the super-rich. A group of people Obama jaw-bones to death, but when he could have done something about it simply extended Bush era largess.

But Ed Schultz still doesn’t get Pres. Obama. He actually still believes the President would walk a picket line with union members. I appreciate Mr. Schultz’s loyalty to the Democratic president, given the alternatives facing workers in 2012. However, Obama would never walk a picket line for anyone.

There’s a reason Obama’s weekly approval is at the lowest since he took office, 40%. He’s earned it.

Read full story · Comments { 21 }

What Happens if Ron Paul Wins the Ames Straw Poll?

Mitt Romney will breathe a sigh of relief, though Politico thinks he’s got to reach the McCain bar.

Michele Bachmann better come in second.

Tim Pawlenty is toast unless he comes in second, and Newt keeps trying to pay off his debt.

As for Rick Perry, he continues to act like Iowa doesn’t matter, while Mike Huckabee takes pot shots at him.

If Mitt was daring, the second Rick Perry announces he should hit him from the left on being against Social Security and Medicare. No general election candidate could survive such a ridiculous proposition as Perry is suggesting, challenging the social safety net on constitutional grounds.

Speaking to Chuck Todd today, vaunted Iowa reporter David Yepsen said that if Paul wins the Ames straw poll it hurts the credibility of Iowa and diminishes it’s political power.

As far as I’m concerned that’s something that should have happened a long time ago. They’ve already got a reputation of people winning the straw poll who can’t go the distance; see Pat Robertson. But there’s still a lot of talk about Paul’s organization this time around, so don’t be surprised if it happens.

Yepsen also had a warning for Obama: liberals are demoralized, not just in New York, but in Iowa, so he better get busy. Trouble is there really is no way for Obama to energize liberals at this point, unless he pulls a juicy jobs initiative out of Sherrod Brown’s hat.

Read full story · Comments { 3 }

Wisconsin News: Democrats Win 2 out of 6

**UPDATED**

To update, The Fix has the whole story today. It wasn’t enough to take back the Senate, but it’s a beginning that could mean something very big by the time 2012 rolls around. I’ve got one thing to say about that: Run, Russ, Run.

Consider this an open thread. Good coverage from Ed Schultz, with Keith Olbermann and John Nichols good too.

Turnout sounds epic.

Results from the A.P.; also from Journal Sentinel (h/t David Nir).

Read full story · Comments { 11 }

Matt Damon on Teachers

Pres. Obama has already telegraphed that he’s ready to work with Republicans, as the Administration prepares to privatize education, while changing the public school system under the mantel of “reform.”

Matt Damon played offense recently and he effusively heaped praise on the teachers who don’t get paid enough and take way too much grief for what they are paid.

But this is when Austerity’s grip, the need for more and better schools, and partnerships with businesses wanting to help offer more options tend to make some people simply ask Why not?

It’s not about qualified teachers with experience getting a living wage and some control over the task they’ve been asked to do.

Over to you.. …

Read full story · Comments { 9 }

Barack Obama on a Bus Pitching Jobs

“Pivot [to jobs] is not an appropriate word. It is continuing the focus we have had…” (Via Sam Stein on Twitter)

That is the funniest thing I’ve read today, until I read this… From The Hill:

President Obama will travel the Midwest by bus this summer to talk up the White House’s job-creation efforts and to try to shore up political support in battleground states.

Obama will embark on a three-day tour, from Aug. 15 to 17. The administration said Wednesday that the trip had long been planned but wouldn’t outline an itinerary beyond saying the stops would be in the Midwest.

[...] “He looks forward to talking to the folks about growing the economy, creating jobs,” said White House press secretary Jay Carney at Wednesday’s press briefing.

Pres. Obama could step off of a bus in Missouri in blue jeans, a work shirt and steel toes, but nobody and I mean nobody is going to buy this stunt. The biggest mistake any politician can make is trying to be someone he isn’t and Barack Obama is not a bus guy. It’s an optics effort, but now his advisers better pray this pr move doesn’t turn into a Dukakis in a tank moment.

As for the jobs pitch, Matt Stoller and Digby team up for the tweet of the day, which really is the biggest failure of Obama’s presidency, though there are plenty of items from which to choose:

Screen capture at top from Huffington Post.

Read full story · Comments { 18 }