TM Connect


Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Taylor Marsh has been writing on line since 1996, with the archives provided here a representation of that work.

Tag Archives | unions

Amidst Jobs Report, Obama Slips

Bad numbers for Obama today, via the latest CBS poll, which shows Pres. Obama at his lowest approval since taking office, with health care part of the picture. So there’s a reason Pres. Obama is making jokes about the polls, while simultaneously hitting the right, but inside the White House no one should be laughing.

When it comes to health care, the President’s approval rating is even lower — and is also a new all-time low. Only 34 percent approved, while 55 percent said they disapproved.

Americans are still worried about the economy, with 84 percent telling CBS they thought it was still in bad condition. However, even that high number represents an improvement: nine in ten thought the economy was bad during the last half of 2008 and at the beginning of 2009, when Mr. Obama assumed the Presidency.

Remains to be seen if the new job numbers will get people’s attention, or if Obama and the Democrats have spent way too much time away from people’s main concern: jobs and the economy. Obama’s most ardently biased fans are trumpeting the news as the best in three years, which it is and is no doubt terrific. However, Via Lynn Sweet, we get a hint as to where the new jobs came from, even as unemployment remains at 9.7%:

Temporary help services and health care continued to add jobs over the month. Employment in federal government also rose, reflecting the hiring of temporary workers for Census 2010. Employment continued to decline in financial activities and in information.

You get a much starker and more honest view from Tula Connell at AFL-CIO:

Although the March report is a big improvement from the hundreds of thousands of jobs lost each month during 2009, job growth is effectively stalled and long-term unemployment is eating away at people’s pocketbooks and the nation’s economy. More than two in every five unemployed workers in this country have been unemployed for more than six months. And the situation is getting worse. The number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks and over) increased by 414,000 over the month to 6.5 million. In March, 44.1 percent of unemployed persons were jobless for 27 weeks or more.

When both unemployed and underemployed workers are counted, there are still some 26 million people without full-time work—a 16.9 percent underemployment rate.

Yesterday, both Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity were quick to preemptively attack the new job numbers, with Michael Steel of the RNC releasing a statement that doesn’t acknowledge anything happened.

“No matter what spin the White House puts on these job numbers, it is unacceptable for President Obama to declare economic success when unemployment remains at 9.7 percent and a large portion of the job growth came from temporary boost in government employment. As Democrats grow Big Government, Americans grow weary of the strain on family budgets, job security and peace of mind. As America’s employers announce the frightening and immediate impact of the Democrat government-run healthcare experiment on their balance sheets, American workers wonder why the only place exempt from increasingly painful belt-tightening seems to be Washington, D.C. In November, the American voters will deliver a few more pink slips – to Congressional Democrats.” – Michael Steele

The only reason Mr. Steele all of people, with yet another story about RNC expense account abuse, and others can get away with this is that the people are fed up with Democrats, who run Washington. That Obama and Democrats passed a health care bill that people didn’t want is another problem.

Republicans are also touting a new CNN poll that reportedly shows an increase in support for Republicans on the economy, with Democrats slipping.

Happy talk about today’s jobs reports is understandable, but the underlying reality is what people are feeling, which is why Democrats are slipping on the economy, while Obama’s numbers start to sag. It’s what you expect in an off-year election season, but watch the trajectory, as it will foreshadow the damage likely to come the Dems way in November.

Read full story · Comments { 16 }

Why the Current Conversation on Health Care is a Walk on the Hamster Wheel

hamster_wheel

Everyone is writing posts with blaring headlines about “breaking news,” new developments, sign on, get busy, the public option is back, seeing a “revival” or some other lingo that offers hope for health care legislation that means something. I’m not buying it. It’s all political kabuki.

Yes, there has been “breaking news,” just nothing that will amount to anything. The public option is as unlikely to happen now as it was in the Senate before. There is nothing I’ve gleaned from anyone that tells me otherwise. Plus it’s an election year, which means everyone is running around saying and signing on to things that look good but they’ll never have to publicly defend, while privately worrying they’ll get caught in Barack Obama’s bipartisanship guillotine next week if they step too far out. Of course, some are real believers, but they’re like the Dirty Dozen at this point, which won’t cut it.

Obama expected to publish his plan this weekend or Monday. After over a year Mr. Obama is now crafting a White House bill. How ironic.

More from the New York Times, with the lines in bold a real problem, as I’ve written before. Offering mandates without competition, well, the Democrats should choke on it. As for the excise tax, it’s worse, but a favorite of the Dem establishment and their media enablers.

“There will be one proposal,” Ms. Sebelius said.

The president’s plan would require most Americans to obtain health insurance or face financial penalties; it would bar insurers from denying coverage based on pre-existing medical conditions, and it would give tax subsidies to help moderate-income people buy private insurance.

Officials said the president’s bill was expected to include a version of the Senate’s proposed tax on high-cost, employer-sponsored insurance policies. It would reflect a deal reached with labor union leaders to limit the impact of the tax on workers.

More recently, some labor officials have expressed dissatisfaction with that deal, and many House Democrats remain opposed to the excise tax.

Democrats said it was still unclear how the president would deal with other disagreements, including the issue of insurance coverage for abortions.

Abortion remains “a wild card,” said a Democrat on Capitol Hill. …

Ah yes, women’s self-determination is now a “wild card” to Democrats where health care legislation is concerned. Looks like we were better off when Obama was voting “present.” Sorry, but this is now beyond all tolerance.

Anyway, I’m getting emails from readers that they’re excited, ready to work and push for the public option. I get it, believe me, and it’s unconscionable that Obama and the Dems have proved so utterly feckless, but it’s all a 2010 political game at this point.

Like Lawrence O’Donnell said on “Countdown,” Clinton health care had 35 sponsors and it died a bloody death on the Senate floor.

Pres. Obama has never led on the issue and at this point is just trying to pass anything to prove he’s done something. Democrats are rightly freaked they’ll go into the 2010 elections with nothing, but they should be more worried that Republicans will beat them over the heads with forcing people into a rigged system that also taxes their benefits. It’s the worst of all worlds, but that seems to be the White House’s idea of “leadership.”

Never has a president and his political party been given so much and done so little with what they’ve been handed, which includes public support for a Medicare buy-in public option that would make the Democratic Party heroes for another generation and beyond, if they only had the guts to follow the public’s lead, leaving the Republicans and the fairy tale of bipartisanship behind.

Read full story · Comments { 71 }

The House is Doing What???

–bumped–

With no clear path forward on major health care legislation, Democratic leaders in Congress effectively slammed the brakes on President Obama’s top domestic priority on Tuesday, saying that they no longer felt pressure to move quickly on a health bill after eight months of setting deadlines and missing them. – Democrats Slam Brakes on Health Care Overhaul

The headline has now been changed to Democrats Put Lower Priority on Health Bill. “Slam breaks,” lower priority, it all amounts to a retreat.

Can you just read the refrain from the right on this one. Democrats send up white flag on health care.Democrats surrender.

(–update–) But never fear, the House is here? Ryan Grimm is reporting that House progressives are pushing Reid on the public option. Are they nuts, stupid or just a fan of wasting more time?

House progressives organizing to rescue health care reform are pressuring their Senate counterparts to go back to the provision that has most energized the party and a majority of Americans throughout the debate: The public option. …

This is as close as you can get to political malpractice. I’m all for pushing health care, but some in the House seem to want to play the fly to the Senate’s screen door, trying to find another way through a point that is blocked by millions of voters, because Democrats blew the message. Besides, the goal should be for Dems to move on from health care, while finding a way to salvage some portion of progress, i.e. offering a package of goodies for people that is easily explainable, which will put pressure on Senate members if they don’t pass them; things like portability, pre-existing exemptions, etc., things we’ve talking about before. But using precious time on the public option? It’s just nuts. (–/update–)

As this drama keeps spinning, already well out of progressive control, Steny Hoyer offers his two cents on what won’t be in Obama’s State of the Union speech tonight.

“I would be surprised if he says specifically exactly how he hopes to get health care done”…

Pres. Obama hasn’t a clue what to do on health care and never has, which is just one reason why we are where we are today, though the entire Democratic majority shares the blame. No one could have imagined they’d be in the fall back position one year into Mr. Obama’s presidency.

Meanwhile, Blanche L. Lincoln of Arkansas and Evan Bayh have said they won’t buy reconciliation. Diane Feinstein say it’s a “time out” for everyone.

So, the political party in charge of everything, which people worked so hard to make happen, are having a time out on health care. The single most draining issue on the economic futures of corporations, small business, job creation, but also the American family’s health. A time out, like children get when they’ve acted up. It’s all just too precious.

This is the setting on the day of Pres. Obama’s first State of the Union speech. A year after coming into office health care is in limbo, with Americans mad, but not at Pres. Obama, with Afghanistan raging, Baghdad exploding, and Netanyahu feeling cozy again.

According to the new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, Obama’s at 50% approval, with the public fed up with “Washington,” but not blaming him, which is what the White House has to bet on right now.

Only 27 percent say they blame him for not being able to find solutions to the country’s problems. By contrast, 48 percent blame Republicans in Congress and 41 percent blame congressional Democrats.

As for the report about Senate Democrats slamming the breaks on health care, I guess Trumka got his answer. Via Sam Stein:

“I don’t think there are the votes in the House to pass the Senate bill,” Trumka said. “I don’t think they exist. I think the ball is in the Senate’s court. The Senate has to come up with 51 votes for a bill that the American public can accept and that the House can get the votes to pass. So I think it is up to the Senate right now.”

In Republican speak, if the Democrats don’t get health care done or put it on the back burner, however you want to frame it, it’s what they will call a win.

The title to this post has been changed; updates added where marked.

Read full story · Comments { 54 }

R&B Soulman Salute

So long, Teddy. Thanks for the sounds of soul. Teddy Pendergrass was one of the best, until a car crash landed him in a wheelchair. It takes a whole body for a chirp to be able to make full sounds. Here’s to Teddy.

Consider this a topic free for all.

Of course, the big news is that Democrats have forced unions to buckle, as a deal on a health care bill nears, ratcheting down yet another level their effectiveness to the average worker. Some would call it bowing to reality of 21st global economics. I’d say the Democrats are about to levy a whopping middle class tax. You decide.

I’ll offer Dylan Ratigan’s piece over at Huffington Post as a jumping off point for discussion. For me, Ratigan is the newest cable talking head worth watching. He’s actually a grown up, with the bonus that he talks about our financial crisis with guts and honesty, afflicting the comfortable every opportunity he gets.

Recently, Ratigan turned his rhetorical guns on Lloyd Blankfein, CEO of Goldman Sachs. It’s a dirty job, but someone’s got to do it:

Look at just the past few years of compensation for some of the CEO’s testifying today. Numbers that don’t even include the expected record-breaking 2009 bonuses.

* $410 million for Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein over 3 years

* $195 million in that timespan for JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon

* $132 million for just two years work at Morgan Stanley for John Mack

Brian Moynihan has just stepped into his role as CEO of bank of America. But he stands to do just fine… His predecessor Ken Lewis made 150 million for 5 years before stepping down.

Unfortunately for the rest of us, their man-made money-making hurricane has devastated this country.

Oh, and get a load of this new attack ad by Brave New Films. Harold Ford’s going to need his friend Joe Scarborough to stay afloat in New York.

Read full story · Comments { 25 }

Health Care Test for Unions

“It could well be” a recipe for disaster in 2010, Trumka told a group of reporters. “I just came back from southern California. I was in five or six places out there… it is amazing the number of people that come up to you unsolicited and say, ‘I’m really worried about this health care bill.’”Sam Stein, Huffington Post

tax

At issue: the Democratic excise tax on the premiums of some health plans, which would hit unions hard, which Pres. Obama, the Senate caucus and the House all support. So, it’s clear that unions won’t get them to give in, but can they get the people they helped put in office to compromise?

This is a defining moment for unions. The question, whether Obama and the Democratic majority will support the millions of middle class workers and their leaders, the foundation of liberal political success going back decades. Or whether the unions will either move Democrats to compromise on the excise tax which hits their members, or hold them accountable by making them pay for the betrayal.

If Obama and the Democrats sell unions out through the “Cadillac” excise tax, and unions decide to go along to continue supporting Dems simply because the other guys are far worse, their power will go pfft! There won’t be a good enough excuse to keep backing Dems, because unions will have seen Dems won’t back their play, proving they’ve lost their leverage with everyone watching.

The other side of it is Republicans don’t care about unionization at all.

Economics is squeezing unions, with long-time allies now all in it for themselves. Globalization hitting was a tough enough challenge for unions, but to now be pitted against the political party you helped make and is now deserting you is a catastrophic development.

From Jake Tapper and ABC, Schaitberger unloads:

A source familiar with the meetings tells ABC News that “the president reiterated his support for the excise tax but also reiterated his commitment to protect working men and women,” perhaps an indication the president is willing to raise the threshold.

While the meeting was going on, International Association of Fire Fighters President Harold Schaitberger — who was not present — issued a statement saying that “The core political principle of this union is we support those who support us. If you make promises to us, we will hold you accountable. … In 2008, then-candidate Obama promised three things. First, he would not raise taxes on folks making less than $250,000 a year. Second, he vowed not to tax your health insurance benefits. Third, he promised that under his health reform plan that people would be able to keep their existing coverage.

“Now the administration is supporting a misguided excise tax on the premiums of some health plans that is in the bill passed by the Senate. This excise tax will affect many of the health plans covering our members. The Senate bill will either impose a tax on health care premiums provided to thousands of America’s fire fighters, or to avoid the tax those benefits will be slashed.”

Schaitberger said that “under this bill every special interest seemed to get something good – the insurance companies, the doctors, the drug companies all get something. But, in the Senate bill, many of our members who have sacrificed for years to build solid health plans to protect their families will get screwed.” …

That’s exactly correct. Now, what are unions prepared to do about it if it happens, which is where it’s heading right now?

Everyone needs to answer this question for him- or herself, because rewarding politicians who betray you with continuing support, thinking that you’ll eventually get a bone thrown your way, is for suckers. It’s also what politicians, regardless of party, count on.

Read full story · Comments { 37 }

Obama’s Numbers, Afghanistan and Other End-of-Year Realities

If you want to understand Obama’s problems, the latest polling is representative. So is this:

“Labor is looking to make the bill better,” American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten said after the meeting. … …Another labor official warned that while labor leaders will very likely grudgingly support the legislation, some may be bitter enough to sit out the midterm elections, dealing a blow to Democrats.

That Mr. Axelrod is joining Gibbs in spewing “insane” nonsense illustrates the White House’s desperation as the year ends. Not exactly where they began, now is it. That’s how badly they’ve screwed up this year.

Segue to Afghanistan…

obama_nobel

On Afghanistan, where most Democrats disagree, especially Obama’s base, the public is behind the President, according to the latest polling. Of course, I support Obama’s plans for nation building, though no one in the Administration dares be that honest about what we’re doing. That said, I’m against the troop increase, which no expert I’ve talked to thinks will matter. I’m also truly puzzled why Pres. Obama and Sect. Clinton continue to emphasize, if secondarily, democracy in places like Afghanistan. It’s a fool’s errand. In fact, Clinton got some flak last week on her human rights Georgetown speech, as she trumpeted Pres. Obama’s strong commitment to human rights, particularly in Afghanistan, one of the main reasons why we fight. Some saying she didn’t stress democracy enough. Using the word democracy and Afghanistan in any context is ludicrous.

Dr. Zbig on “Morning Joe” this week explained perfectly a possible way through and it isn’t Sen. Levin’s idea of a national militia. After hearing Levin at the Rand event in the famous and beautiful Caucus Room, I agreed with him up to a point, but hit a wall every time I envisioned anything in Afghanistan on a national level. It’s nonsense, as they have never operated that way, so our efforts won’t change that embedded history. Zbig explained that we must not only pay the local Afghans more than the Taliban, to keep them from uniting, but also to protect their own territory, but encourage Afghan militias to stand up for their local jurisdictions. It was the Soviet Union who began the dismantling of organic Afghan society, with the vacuum left after they withdrew, helped along by Ronald Wilson Reagan (and Bill Casey’s war), causing mass chaos and an opportunity for Al Qaeda to grow. But Bush-Cheney’s warlord strategy made matters worse, destroying the tribe fabric further. By empowering local Afghans to police their own territory, while giving them the means to do so, aka money, with our troops as backup, we might find a way through this. Though as Obama said on “60 Minutes,” we are there for the long haul, something I’ve known for a very long time (see podcast for full story). It gets down to what we’re doing and trying to accomplish. But democratizing Afghanistan? It’s laughable. Where democracies already exist, we can support, but our military engagement must be left for clear and present danger situations in strategic regions that impact us directly, though extraordinary humanitarian crises should also draw our attention and action, but not knee jerk “send in the troops” mentality, only if international involvement is also present. Deluding ourselves about democratizing Afghanistan is 20th century thinking that leads to a dark abyss. See George W. Bush and Iraq.

Back to Obama’s poll numbers as the year ends. From the Wall Street Journal:

The biggest worry for Democrats is that the findings could set the stage for gains by Republican candidates in next year’s elections. Support from independents for the president and his party continues to dwindle. In addition, voters intending to back Republicans expressed far more interest in the 2010 races than those planning to vote for Democrats, illustrating how disappointment on the left over attempts by party leaders to compromise on health care and other issues is damping enthusiasm among core party voters.

But public displeasure with Democrats wasn’t translating directly into warmth for Republicans. [...]

…And in one arena, Afghanistan, Mr. Obama appeared to have some success in winning support for his planned troop surge. Liberals remain largely opposed to the strategy, but in fewer numbers compared with before Mr. Obama made his case in a speech at West Point. Overall, by 44% to 41%, a plurality believe his strategy is the right approach.

Still, the survey paints a decidedly gloomy picture for Democrats, who appear to be bearing the brunt of public unease as unemployment has risen from 7.6% to 10% since Mr. Obama took office. Just 35% of voters said they felt positively about the Democratic Party, a 14-point slide since February. Ten percent felt “very positive.”

I’m just wondering how you stand on Obama and the Democrats, thinking beyond the health care debacle. Or can you even separate that right now?

The American people are well beyond the health care debate, pushing it off of their table entirely, as Democrats have taken way too long, revealed way too much of the sausage making, if you will, while voters are struggling to make Christmas merry with less.

With Bernanke now getting a nod, including as Time magazine’s man of the year, it once again illuminates the one thing Democrats have been missing all year in the combustible dynamic. How people feel about the economy and j-o-b-s. It’s a major reason Obama’s in a rush over health care all of a sudden. But after a year of neglecting the subject, the election year push may be too late, as is this. It also happens to be the one opening for Republicans, with Mitt Romney gnashing his teeth to jump in.

Read full story · Comments { 22 }

From U.S. to Afghanistan, Women Make The Difference

In the preface of “The Shriver Report,” Maria Shriver’s report on women, John D. Podesta, President and CEO of Center for American Progress, makes important points, starting with basics:

Women becoming primary breadwinners or co-breadwinners changed everything.But, even though we were all witness to this phenomenon’s slow emergence over many years, these changes seem somehow to have snuck up on us. As a result, our policy landscape remains stuck in an idealized past, where the typical family was composed of a married-for-life couple with a full-time breadwinner and full-time homemaker who raised the children herself.

Government policies and laws continue to rely on an outdated model of the American family. And, despite the existence of innovative practices in corporate America, most employers fail to acknowledge or accommodate the daily juggling act their workers perform, they are oblivious to the fact that their employees are now more likely to be women, and they ignore the fact that men now share in domestic duties.

Then Maria Shriver delves deeper.

ScreenHunter_43 Oct. 19 12.02

The statistics don’t lie, as they are modern women’s reality, which Shriver proves in her report:

Quite simply, as women go to work, everything changes. Yet, we, as a nation, have not yet digested what this all means and what changes are still to be made. But change we must, especially as the current recession amplifies and accelerates these trends throughout our economy and society. The Great Recession led to massive job losses, especially within male-dominated industries. Since the recession began in December 2007, men have accounted for three out of every four jobs lost (73.6 percent)4 and now 2 million wives are supporting their families while their unemployed husbands seek work.5 Women now, for the first time, make up half (49.9 percent as of July 2009) of all workers on U.S. payrolls. This is a dramatic change from just over a generation ago: In 1969, women made up only a third of the workforce (35.3 percent).6

With the backing of the Shriver name, American Progress took on Mrs. Shriver’s charge, with the subject matter vitally important.

I’ve been writing, talking and speaking out on the cataclysmic shifts in the lives of women most of my adult life. A revolution that started with Betty Friedan, but exploded when the Pill was made available and women got control over our lives. Long before Roe v. Wade came Griswold, the seminal legal decision for women in Supreme Court history.

Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965),[1] was a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Constitution protected a right to privacy. The case involved a Connecticut law that prohibited the use of contraceptives. By a vote of 7-2, the Supreme Court invalidated the law on the grounds that it violated the “right to marital privacy”. – Wikipedia

Growing up within the modern feminist movement, my views on privacy and women’s rights are embedded in my politics and are revealed in everything I do, particularly foreign policy.

Nicholas Kristof’s “Half the Sky movement” is about this very thing, which he founded along with his wife, Sheryl WuDunn.

It has been proven over and over again that without women being empowered in developing nations the country they’re in cannot achieve stability. Kristof has compiled a list of groups that help women in developing countries, two of which TM.com sponsors by offering a free banner on the homepage of this site. It’s a way you can easily get involved and make a difference for women in developing nations.

One of my favorite groups is Afghan Institute of Learning, but there are many more.

As we debate our policy in Afghanistan, it’s critical to look beyond simply keeping women from being brutalized. Our imperative now is to promote their health and educational vitality so Afghan women and girls can become a force in Afghanistan. The only chance this country (or any other) has for moving beyond the war cycle, with our own policy deeply in need of a more progressive and enlightened approach than simply reverting to the “withdrawal of troops” syndrome, which is hopelessly mired in Vietnam thinking. We must realize that security can come without escalation if a broader eye is cast upon how funding is allotted and delivered to the people of nations we must support in order for the national security of our own country to remain secure and the American people safe.

Maria Shriver’s report is as timely as it is important. It’s thrilling to have a well known and recognizable woman, a superstar in many circles, out front and speaking out through a serious study on women in America, because it raises the attention on the debate people like me have been trying to spur on in the shadows for a very long time.

Nothing is as important to America than understanding the expanded role of women. It is this very realization of women’s expanding role that is rippling through the world and why our continued effort in Afghanistan is critically important. Not only to Afghan girls and women, but to American national security, as well as the security of the region and the world community.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Unemployment Hits 9.8%

Stocks are up. Ben Bernanke says that the recession is over. And I sense a growing willingness among movers and shakers to declare “Mission Accomplished” when it comes to fighting the slump. It’s time, I keep hearing, to shift our focus from economic stimulus to the budget deficit. No, it isn’t. And the complacency now setting in over the state of the economy is both foolish and dangerous. … – Paul Krugman

Worse than expected. Much worse.

Watching this from the outside, as someone who doesn’t write much about the economy, leaving that to experts, I’ve been waiting for quite some time for this column from Krugman. That all this hits on the weekend where Michael Moore’s movie goes wide is no coincidence. Neither is the fact that Mr. Moore is advertising big on Drudge (but not on progressive new media sites). Talk about capitalism, a love story, something to which not even Mr. Moore is immune.

Krugman today:

… Yes, the Federal Reserve and the Obama administration have pulled us “back from the brink” — the title of a new paper by Christina Romer, who leads the Council of Economic Advisers. She argues convincingly that expansionary policy saved us from a possible replay of the Great Depression.

But while not having another depression is a good thing, all indications are that unless the government does much more than is currently planned to help the economy recover, the job market — a market in which there are currently six times as many people seeking work as there are jobs on offer — will remain terrible for years to come. …

When people see Moore’s movie it’s likely to hit them like a steel mallet in the kisser. Everything is in it to make people madder at a moment when health care is cresting. The public option being talked about a lot more seriously, even if Harry Reid thinks by public option we mean simply competition. Ah, it’s all in the definition, isn’t it?

Appreciating that Barack Obama came into office inheriting cascading catastrophes, as Moore has said ad nauseam in interviews, I still wonder if a year from now if circumstances are the same, whether Democrats are going to be given slack if 9.8% turns into 10, or for that matter stays flat. That’s not how mid-term elections historically work, especially when Obama promised otherwise from the start.

Didn’t Pres. Obama pitch that the stimulus must be passed immediately for things to recover? His advisers saying even more: Obama advisers had predicted that his stimulus package would hold unemployment at or below 8 percent.

I doubt anyone will buy the next pitch, that if the stimulus hadn’t passed things would be much worse.

One word: JOBS. It’s a topic that’s been mostly missing since Obama took office.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Laboring Every Day For What?


compliments of WB

… [...] So to all you liberal organizations in the “veal pen” — this is your moment of truth. I get all your emails. And the next Common Purpose meeting is probably on Tuesday. If you can’t get it together to at least put out a statement of support for Van Jones and condemn the White House for using him as a sacrificial lamb to right wing extremists that will devour us all if left unchecked, it’s time to add “proudly liberal only when it doesn’t matter” to your logo and be done with it. – Jane Hamsher

Will labor blink when further compromise comes down from White House mountain on health care?

On Labor Day, I’m thinking about all the work put in to elect a Democratic Congress and president, looking at what we have to show for it. So far I’m not impressed at all.

As for Glenn Beck, send Keith Olbermann every thing you’ve got on him, though he’s not the issue at all. However, for what Olbermann does he’s the perfect target.

The American people stood up and demanded answers. Instead of providing them, the Administration had Jones resign under cover of darkness. I continue to be amazed by the power of everyday Americans to initiate change in our government through honest questioning, and judging by the other radicals in the administration, I expect that questioning to continue for the foreseeable future. – Glenn Beck

As for the rest of us, this is about President Obama and his White House team proving that people are expendable, as are our issues.

Van Jones is just the latest. On Labor Day, this message makes me choke. Another progressive just lost his job and we lost a voice.

As for what’s the latest on health care, someone needs to get Politico’s Mike Allen a copy of the New York Times.

Just for the record, as I’ve been saying for months, Barack Obama isn’t doing anything now he didn’t telegraph he was going to do all along. Passion for purpose on health care just isn’t his thing, never was.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Heading In to Labor Day

On health care, Obama’s willingness to forgo the public option is sure to anger his party’s liberal base. But some administration officials welcome a showdown with liberal lawmakers if they argue they would rather have no health care law than an incremental one. The confrontation would allow Obama to show he is willing to stare down his own party to get things done. – Politico

obama_approval_index_september_2_2009

According to a new CNN poll, “a majority of independent voters disapprove of how Barack Obama’s handling his job as president.” Now, I leave polling analysis to the few experts who are any good at it. However, the current numbers heading into next week’s resumption of political business after the recess are enough to give anyone pause. Especially since one of the Democrats’ core issues will lie in the balance of what they think they can push. Bad numbers invariably means cautious politicians, which isn’t good for anyone who wants bold, sweeping and courageous legislation out of Congress.

Interesting that the CNN poll also says that 9 out of 10 Democrats “approve of the job Obama’s doing, up three points from a month ago.” Well, that certainly isn’t representative of Obama’s biggest supporters, people around here, as well as die hard progressive activists who feel the wind going out of the sails, and not just because we lost one of the biggest champions on health care reform we’ve ever had. All of this taken together, including the 8-point drop from Republicans, doesn’t bode well for any public option, co-op or otherwise, going forward. Because Obama’s got Dems, with Independents the group he’s lost, who also happen to be the most concerned about costs, the deficit, as well as bad PR health care reform picked up from too little messaging and framing out of the White House, also known as lack of leadership from the top.

Rasmussen numbers for Obama, but also the generic congressional ballot, are even worse.

I’m not trying to be negative or rain on anyone’s hope parade regarding the public option, or saying you shouldn’t still work your hearts out. It’s just that the political analysis of the situation is what it is and has been for quite some time; ever since Obama and the Democrats allowed the deadline for a deal to slip into oblivion during the August recess. It’s not about Obama making the base happy. It’s about gaining back some of what he’s lost among Independents. The rationale being that Democrats aren’t going anywhere. There’s nowhere else to go.

Asked if the union would work against any bill that did not hit those targets, Trumka told reporters during a briefing: “That means we won’t support the bill if it doesn’t have the public option.” – AFL-CIO: Gov’t option an absolute must

Read full story · Comments are closed

My Blue Collar Husband and Terry McAuliffe

cross-posted on Alternet and Huffington Post

We’re new to the D.C. area. So when we started paying attention to the Virginia governors race it was late in the game. But because I don’t write about these issues, I wouldn’t have even commented on the race if it hadn’t been for McAuliffe being attacked for backing Hillary Clinton in ’08. That’s how petty it’s gotten.

It didn’t take long, however, for my blue collar husband to take sides. I haven’t, except that Brian Moran isn’t an option for me, because he’s still fighting ’08 primary fights against Terry McAuliffe through Clinton. That turned us off from the start. So it’s between Creigh Deeds and Terry McAuliffe, though not for my husband. There’s only one choice for him. That’s McAuliffe. I’ll explain in a minute. For those of you not familiar with the race, here’s where it stands today, according to FiveThirtyEight:

[...] Most public polling is showing Deeds and Moran gaining and McAuliffe dropping, but the numbers are close enough that a good GOTV operation could make the difference for any one of the three candidates. I see the most likely outcome as a Deeds win, but McAuliffe could still win if Deeds and Moran continue to split the “non-McAuliffe” vote. If Moran’s supporters begin to defect to Deeds then there is probably no way for McAuliffe to win what would then be functionally a 2-person race against Deeds.

As with all close races, it’s about GOTV.

People must be a little worried, because a couple of posts have lately picked on Terry McAuliffe. One post a bit earlier took issue with something I’d written and even goes so far as to completely misrepresent a post I wrote in order to target McAuliffe. The post I wrote was about Moran targeting McAuliffe through Hillary. Believe it or not, this post takes out after McAuliffe for backing Clinton too.

What does that have to do with Virginia? As my husband looked for work, he wanted to know that too.

After having the same job since he was in his twenties, when we moved he took early retirement, which meant my husband was looking for work once we landed. Even as talented as he is it was daunting. He can build anything; give him two beams and you’ll get yourself a shopping mall; he can also fix anything. He was offered a couple of jobs, then landed a really good one, but the hunt had an impact. That’s when McAuliffe’s ads started showing up. He also heard Creigh Deeds, coming to the judgment that he “sounds like a solid guy.” But McAuliffe’s ads had a bigger impact on him. What my husband heard from McAuliffe was a man who can widen his job options if he goes hunting again. He also heard enthusiasm and someone who he believes has the dynamic optimism to convince businesses to choose Virginia.

When I told him I hadn’t decided whom to vote for, though neither of us will vote for Moran because of his negativity, he looked at me like I’d just insulted him. “How can you not vote for the guy?, meaning McAuliffe. “He’s so optimistic. You just know he’ll tell businesses they have to come to Virginia and they’ll come.” Of course, my husband doesn’t know a thing about the progressive push against Terry McAuliffe, so when I told him he just laughed. After looking for work and seeing the job market after so long, he’s looking for someone who can pitch big companies, get them to Virginia and help people like him have more choices. As far as he’s concerned it’s McAuliffe. “You’ve gotta vote for him,” he now simply says.

I just don’t know. With Moran hitting me wrong from the start, looking at Creigh Deeds, he seems solid, his record a good one. The Washington Post endorsement was impressive. But…

I’m just not convinced he can beat Bob McDonnell, who is slick. He’s also got serious right-wing tendencies, and the guy he picked to run his campaign proves McDonnell’s judgment stinks.

“One of the underlying concerns that many thoughtful Virginians have about McDonnell are his ties to the Christian right,” Sabato said. “I can’t tell you how many times senior people have asked, ‘Who will Bob McDonnell appoint to the 4,000 appointments he gets?’ ‘Who will run the college boards of visitors and the state agencies?’

“The reasons these questions matter to the people asking them is they fear it will be the far right and the Christian conservatives,” he said.

So, it gets down to who can beat McDonnell for me. Nothing else matters. I’m just not sure it’s Creigh Deeds.

“The other big issue is electability, and Bob McDonnell has already beaten Creigh Deeds.”Terry McAuliffe

Read full story · Comments are closed

Unions Even Help My Non-Union Husband

The “Morning Joe” crew has really been on a race to the bottom this week.

First they refused to even discuss the murder of Dr. Tiller. Relegating this horrific assassination to quiet “horrifying” murmurs from Mika, as Scarborough ran for cover.

Then the crew mixed up the generals in back to back segments that had anyone watching in full tilt whiplash. First showing a picture of fired Gen. McKiernan, Mika saying he was to have his confirmation hearing that day; then in the very next segment finally getting Lt. Col. McChrystal’s photo up, with Mika saying it was his confirmation that was on deck. No correction offered, just two different segments, one wrong, the next right, without ever acknowledging what had happened.

Now we’ve got “Morning Joe” and guests Andrew Ross Sorkin and Jim Cramer proclaiming that unions cause companies to fail. Never mind what they offer middle class families.

“Name a successful unionized company. Think. You’re going to go to break before you come up with one. And that’s the problem.” Andrew Ross Sorkin

Mind you, this ignorant pronouncement was said in a room full of union NBC employees, as Brian Beutler also noted.

They even impact people who are not union.

Take my husband. He’s a blue collar genius who can fix and build anything. Mark has always proclaimed loudly that without the unions trying to push where he worked for 25 years, his wages wouldn’t have been competitive with what they offer, including benefits and pension. I cannot count how many times Mark has hailed the unions in being responsible for keeping the company he worked for honest. Now that we’ve moved to D.C., Mark has looked for work across the region, with some companies telling him joining a union would be mandatory at some point. He just smiles and says, gladly. He’s working non-union again, having no trouble getting job offers, proving once again that a little college is terrific, but having a trade and being creative in a bad economy is even better.

Brian Beutler nailed them.

Off the top of my head I can give you several Teamster-represented companies who continue to thrive, despite the economic downturn, but there are thousands more: UPS, Eight O’Clock Coffee, Coca-Cola Enterprises, PepsiCo, Anheuser-Busch and MillerCoors. The Morning Joe team really should be embarrassed for showing their lack of knowledge on the subject. – James Hoffa, General President of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, in a statement to TPMDC

Joe Scarborough, Mika and their entire crew have no idea how valuable unions are to people and families, including ours. Even when a company isn’t union, the fact that unions are out there working for the average family makes all the difference in the world.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Health Care Hit Job to Air on NBC

This ad is filled with distortions. It’s set to air immediately following “Meet the Press” this Sunday.

One item in it is easily debunked from HHS:

The council will not recommend clinical guidelines for payment, coverage or treatment. The council will consider the needs of populations served by federal programs and opportunities to build and expand on current investments and priorities. It will also provide input on priorities for the $400 million fund in the Recovery Act that the Secretary will allocate to advance this type of research.

SEIU has written a letter to NBC over their decision to air a 30-minute infomercial filled with fearmongering through falsehoods about universal health care. They remind NBC that as a licensee, they have a responsibility to the public beyond just making money.

There are many of you very involved and interested in the health care debate. Seems like a call to action to me.

TM NOTE: SEIU is currently running an ad here on this issue, which is completely independent of this editorial. However, it’s no secret that I’m not only a former union member, but have in the past been hired as a reporter for them and support their work. I hope you click on the ad in the right hand margin when it appears to learn how you can help.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Unions and the Middle Class Crisis

Paul Krugman’s column today is a clarion call.

Some of the wage cuts, like the givebacks by Chrysler workers, are the price of federal aid. Others, like the tentative agreement on a salary cut here at The Times, are the result of discussions between employers and their union employees. Still others reflect the brute fact of a weak labor market: workers don’t dare protest when their wages are cut, because they don’t think they can find other jobs.

Whatever the specifics, however, falling wages are a symptom of a sick economy. And they’re a symptom that can make the economy even sicker.

…But the unemployment rate is almost certainly still rising. And all signs point to a terrible job market for many months if not years to come — which is a recipe for continuing wage cuts, which will in turn keep the economy weak.

Meanwhile, unions are manning the lifeboats, especially on EFCA, something that Specter opposes, which should give everyone pause. As unions like UAW prove they’re willing to take deep cuts where they’re required, while remaining the last vestige of the further falling paycheck.

Look at what’s happening at the Boston Globe. Read the comments on this latest development, as conservatives believe this is their window, tantamount to Dems complaints about deregulation. As conservatives believe, unions are the problem and why businesses are failing. Keep it up, because it only proves why the blue collar trust in Republicans is unwarranted.

American dreaming you’ll one day be rich doesn’t make it happen when no one’s around to keep your wages from falling to a minimum.

Krugman gives Obama some credit in the last paragraph, while stating more needs to be done.

I’ll second that, with one avenue nobody is talking about. College is one thing, but the importance of having a real skill is another. Pres. Obama never talks about trades. You know, like repairing stuff. As my husband said to me recently upon his first venture into the job wars in over 25 years, air conditioning and heating repairmen are in demand all over Craig’s List. By the grace of the gods, my husband has talent; hand him two toothpicks and he can build you a shopping mall. But there isn’t enough understanding of how much tradesmen and women can mean to this economy.

We’re in deep trouble, as unions continue to step in and step up. With wages falling there is no bottom, except what can be applied by the unions. So goes unions. So go the middle class. Democrats need to continue championing unions, even as they remake themselves completely. They’re the only hope we’ve got, even when your company isn’t union. I’ve seen this myself in my own union life, then through my husband, who knows this first hand.

This nightmare is a long way from over.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Dem Conference Cold on Reid’s Deal

Photobucket

Well, there is blood in their veins, and according to The Hill, it’s boiling.

After a stupendously stupid promise to Sen. Specter, which has him moving ahead of die hard Democrats on committee seating, some are not being quiet about Reid’s sell out.

One senior Democratic lawmaker told The Hill that the Democratic Conference will vote against giving the longtime Pennsylvania Republican seniority over lawmakers like Harkin, Mikulski and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) when they hold their organizational meeting after the 2010 election.

Under his deal with Reid, Specter would jump ahead of all but a few Democrats when it comes time to dole out committee chairmanships and assignments.

“That’s his deal and not the caucus’s,” the senior lawmaker said of Reid’s agreement with Specter.

The rumor mill is rumbling with all sorts of scenarios, with this the obvious: Specter could bump Harkin after the election from his chairmanship of the powerful Appropriations Labor, Health and Human Services subcommittee or return to be chairman of Judiciary if the current chairman, Leahy, takes over the gavel at Appropriations.

Harry Reid doesn’t care about whether Specter is a Democrat in name only, that he voted against the budget just yesterday, any more than he cares that Joe Lieberman backed John McCain in the election. Reid’s job is different. What Reid cares about is “Democratic” bodies in the caucus that can be sold whatever it takes to get them in. To him, a “Democratic” is a Democrat. Principle and political purpose has nothing to do with it.

Oh, and just so we’re clear. I could care less about political purity. But if a Democrat isn’t going to support signature issues of our party that’s a completely different story, especially someone coming from blue Pennsylvania. You expect a little winger juice running through the veins of a Dem coming from the deep south, but even Casey, who is against choice, understands what EFCA means to Pennsylvania workers.

Besides, one of the real reasons Specter jumped ship, besides that he couldn’t beat the tea bag candidate Pat Toomey in the primary, is to stick it to the Club for Growth and the GOP for not standing by their man. This is a revenge move on Specter’s part. That Reid’s allowing him his vengeance and his cake too shouldn’t sit well with the caucus. It’s good to see some reaction, though I’d like to see full scale rebellion against Reid.

Read full story · Comments are closed

UAW to Chrysler’s Rescue

Photobucket

If this ends up working it could revolutionize unions and (save?) the U.S. auto industry. What compromise and solution look like when desperation is seen as opportunity:

The United Auto Workers union will own 55% of a restructured Chrysler LLC and its retiree health care trust will get a seat on the board if union members vote to approve contract concessions this week.

Chrysler stock could even be traded publicly again, as there are mechanisms for the UAW to sell shares to fund the health care trust.

Factory-level union leaders voted unanimously Monday night to recommend approval of concessions that union President Ron Gettelfinger said would help keep the automaker out of bankruptcy. ..

The union made serious concessions, according to this report, which has laid off workers getting only 50% of their gross pay, among other deal sweeteners instead of bankruptcy:

The union also agreed to consolidate nonskilled labor job classifications into a team concept at all factories. Performance and Christmas bonuses will be suspended this year and next to help pay health care costs.

Ed Schultz has been all over Gettelfinger, so we’ll see if swine flu coverage takes a back seat to this blockbuster story, which has the UAW saving Chrysler, but also a lot of middle class jobs through compromises that are anything but easy.

I’ve said for a long time that globalization will not only force unions to get creative for survival, but that it could open opportunities to remake unions if leadership understands that the 20th century rules are gone and compromises that hurt at first will be the moves that make unions once again indispensable, not only here, but globally. Their viability depends on it, but so do workers across the globe hoping to raise their standards of living in a world more passionate about profit.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Anti Middle Class Market Games By Citigroup

–updated–

The Employee Free Choice Act war began today. Citigroup didn’t waste one moment getting involved, in the hopes that the Employee Free Choice Act will be the victim, right after the American middle class, as they downgraded Wal-Mart from buy to hold today. All of this based on “unionization” fears. Shorter Citigroup: manipulate the market using unions as the scapegoat. Even shorter Citigroup: screw the middle class.

Citigroup Inc. lowered its rating on Wal-Mart Stores Inc. to hold from buy on Tuesday, citing concern that legislation intended to make it easier for employees to unionize would raise the retail giant’s labor costs and hurt its competitiveness. [...]

The proposed Employee Free Choice Act, a top priority for unions this year, could be introduced to the House as early as Tuesday by Rep. George Miller, D.- Calif., the analyst said. Wal-Mart would be the “primary target” if any such bill were to be passed, especially because the U.S. food retail industry has historically been unionized with the exception of Wal-Mart, the largest food retailer, she said. …

First, EFCA makes it easier for employees to form unions.

Republicans don’t want unions and neither do corporations.

“Secret ballots” make it easier for employers to manipulate the process by revealing these “secret ballots” as they decide, without sunrise and transparency.

Finally and most importantly, EFCA DOES NOT ELIMINATE THE “SECRET BALLOT,” but it would be up to the workers to decide. EFCA offers more choices while “secret ballots” (without EFCA) offer only one. (Sorry to scream, but too many Republicans are lying about this issue.)

So why are some Democrats caving? Sen. Blanche Lincoln’s reasoning:

At least six Senators who have voted to move forward with the so-called card-check proposal, including one Republican, now say they are opposed or not sure — an indication that Senate Democratic leaders are short of the 60 votes they need for approval.

The legislation is divisive and distracting, said Arkansas Sen. Blanche Lincoln in an interview Monday. The Democratic lawmaker, who was previously seen as a supporter, said the Senate should focus on creating jobs and improving the U.S. economy. “I have 90,000 Arkansans who need a job, that’s my No. 1 priority,” she said. The legislation, she said, would be “divisive and we don’t need that right now. We need to focus on the things that are more important.” [...]

Aw, heck, Blanche, we wouldn’t want to be “divisive.” It’s just middle class wages and benefits we’re fighting to bolster. After all, not everyone can afford to work and feed their family on minimum wage. I wonder if she’s tried that one lately. Let’s take away Sen. Lincoln’s health care, plus lower her wages to see how she likes it.

UPDATE: George Stephanopoulos is reporting that a “leadership source” has said that Sen. Reid has decided not to schedule a floor vote on EFCA until summer.

Read full story · Comments { 12 }

A Personal Note on Labor and the Middle Class

“I do not view the labor movement as part of the problem, to me it’s part of the solution.” – President Barack Obama

I married a blue collar craftsman not all that long ago. Today, after many, many years as a Southwest Gas technician, he took early retirement. One of the things he’s said over the years I’ve known him is that without unions his job likely wouldn’t have been as good, with solid middle class pay, overtime, full ranging benefits, vacation days (something we often joked about as I continued to work 24/7 without vacation or health benefits, except for sharing in his largess) and everything else that went along with his job, including retirement benefits. My husband with his many skills (give him two toothpicks, and he can build you a shopping mall) is the epitome of what we’re now fighting for today. Good middle class jobs where a man or woman can feed his or her family. But today, at our house, it’s his day. A day to honor his incredible work ethic, his tremendous talents and skills, and the fact that his company honored him, with people from the entire company descending to do the same this morning at a breakfast. They asked him why he showed up in his gas uniform. Mark simply said, “Because I’m proud of this job.” Tonight is a big party for him. No one has earned it more. A man who represents the American work ethic to his core. He is quite simply my hero.

Listening to President Obama and Vice President Biden this morning talking about workers and the middles class at the very moment my husband was being honored was an emotional moment for me. It’s just one of those amazing days in our lives.

For the backbone of the USA, it’s insult on top of injury. Over the course of America’s last economic expansion, the middle class participated in very few of the benefits. But now in the midst of this historic economic downturn, the middle class sure is participating in all of the pain. Something is seriously wrong when the economic engine of this nation — the great middle class — is treated this way. President Obama and I are determined to change this. Quite simply, a strong middle class equals a strong America. We can’t have one without the other. – Vice President Joe Biden

With a good job, in this country anything is possible. Labor is always there, ever vigilant, benefiting all workers, whether you’re in a union shop or not.

Read full story · Comments { 25 }

CTV Stands by NAFTA Story



“The facts of our story are accurate.” – Greg
McIsaac, Communications Manager, News Information and Current Affairs, CTV

The NAFTA –
Obama story
gets more interesting.

I called CTV to verify the story, especially given the Obama campaign’s cries that it’s “inaccurate.” After asking Greg McIsaac of CTV if they were sticking by their story, he quickly called me back with verification. The facts of our story are accurate.

Then why are the traditional media and Obama blogs pushing Obama’s side of the story that the
CTV story is “innacurate?”
That an embassy
spokesperson
alone proves the reporting is wrong? Back channels exist, which
means skepticism should apply, especially with CTV standing by the facts of
their story:


Within the last month, a top staff member for Obama’s campaign telephoned
Michael Wilson, Canada’s ambassador to the United States, and warned him that
Obama would speak out against NAFTA, according to Canadian sources.

The staff member reassured Wilson that the criticisms would only be campaign
rhetoric, and should not be taken at face value. … ..

Obama
staffer gave warning of NAFTA rhetoric

Will the journalistic stenography on behalf of Mr. Obama ever end?

To add a point here, since when do we automatically believe “spokes people?” Scott McClellan during the Scooter Libby trial comes to mind. Dana Perino on, well, just about any subject does too. There are all sorts of things that go on back channel, with a spokesperson the last one to know. As for McIsaac at CTV, the network stands by the “facts” in the story they reported. You’ll have to decide if that is any different on the merits.

Read full story · Comments are closed

Free Elections

reported from Las Vegas, Nevada

Can the Culinary hold its membership to its Obama endorsement (and turn it out) by acknowledging members might support Clinton but urging them to put union loyalty above their candidate affinity? The “It’s the union above all else” pitch began Wednesday when Secretary-Treasurer D. Taylor announced the Obama endorsement. He praised all the candidates but made it clear that his members value union solidarity above all. Or do they? – Power of Culinary Union hangs in balance as its protege Kihuen tries to break Obama hold, by Jon Ralston

The Las Vegas Sun has called into question a post I wrote regarding union intimidation. Being a strong believer in freedom of the press I would normally not respond to such an article. However, they have called into question my credibility and I feel compelled to respond. Under no circumstances did I receive any money from AFSCME prior to posting the blog about union intimidation, nor did money have anything to do with it. It was about free elections, fundamental to our American way of life. I was told a union had intimidated one of its members and I posted on it. People are free to express their opinions and support whomever they choose. However, if their support is gained by intimidation, that crosses the line, in my opinion. We each should have the right to make our voting decisions without intimidation by anyone and cast that vote based on our personal belief about the individual candidates. Hopefully, no one disagrees with that. That the Las Vegas Sun chose to couch their attack on my credibility by accusing me of taking money in the form of a question shows how far they were willing to go to target me without any evidence whatsoever. It’s through that prism you should view their entire piece.

Second, the story on the worker intimidation at Paris was an important story. The woman to whom I spoke would not allow me to use her name and would not give anyone else’s name to me either. My post came out before the Sun’s piece, and since the woman would not give names when asked, I covered the story as given. Union intimidation is a serious charge. Whether someone is supporting Clinton or Obama does not change the facts. I believed the woman’s story after talking to her and decided to post on it. Period. I followed it up with an update of someone who saw the event, which was put in the comment section of the Sun’s article.

I did not call the Culinary union, because as is shown in the Sun piece, they’re not going to admit intimidation. Anyone who has ever covered issues like this or has any experience knows that unions answering questions on the record will never admit such coercion or intimidation.

I didn’t respond to the Sun’s request to talk because I simply didn’t get the email, which ended up in my junk mail folder. Simple as that, though I realize people want another explanation more involved, but hey, it’s the truth.

Obviously, Obama’s fans across the web are attacking the messenger, me. It’s been going on for a very long time. They need to attack my credibility because I’ve obviously hit a nerve. It’s also not the first time the Obama camp decided to target a progressive voice. They attacked Paul Krugman on a “fact check” page when Krugman dared to criticize Obama’s policies, never mind that Krugman is one of the only leading progressive voices in traditional journalism today. There were also rumblings that the Obama camp was readying an attack against one powerfully effective blogger during the Donnie McClurkin dust up. Chris Bowers wrote:


It is certainly disturbing that Obama is attacking a leading progressive voice in a media system where progressive opinion journalists are few are far between. What is even more disturbing is that this is not the first time the Obama campaign has considered doing this. Back during the Donnie McClurkin fiasco, it has been confirmed to me from multiple sources that the Obama campaign was preparing opposition research papers of this sort against some one of the progressive bloggers who were speaking ill of him at the time (Update: I have edited the previous sentence for the sake of clarity and accuracy. I know two separate things, and conflating them is a bit of speculation on my part. First, I know that about a year ago, someone was conducting oppo research on most major progressive bloggers, but I don’t know who. After I heard about oppo being prepared against one blogger a couple months ago, I speculated that meant the earlier oppo was conducted by the Obama campaign as well. That is purely speculation on my part. Take it for what it is worth).

The “speculation” Bowers is talking about is just that, but when you combine it with the continual attacks on me and others, it’s clear the truth isn’t the target, dissent is.

Today, the Las Vegas Sun took it a step further by impugning my credibility through question marks and by insinuating I not only might have taken money from a union that supports Clinton, but that if I did so I wouldn’t disclose it. And they did it without one single shred of evidence.

The message is simple from the Obama camp. They want to intimidate and silence me, because I’m effective. They are now willing, using Markos’s site and the diaries at DailyKos, to call me a liar. This is what Obama’s supporters do whenever anyone dares to print critical pieces on Obama’s record or stories they don’t like. Today, the Las Vegas Sun played along.

UPDATE: Rolling Stone found another incident the Las Vegas Sun ignored, as did Obama supporters who want to make this story about me, because the campaign has been caught doing just what’s been charged.

The first instance involves a food server at the Luxor who is also a shop steward for the Culinary Union and disagreed with the union’s Obama endorsement; she asked that her name not be used for fear of reprisal. The worker says she was told by the union that she would not be given time off to caucus if she did not pledge to vote for Obama. Ultimately, she complained to Luxor management and was assured she would be allowed to attend.

UPDATE 2: The double standard at progressive blogs backing Obama is clear, with DailyKos allowing defamatory diaries against pro-Clinton supporters to stand, while “editors” send warning notices when pro-Clinton bloggers post diaries challenging Obama.

UPDATE 3: An epilogue to this story is also available.

This post has been updated.

Read full story · Comments are closed